CS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 1,901 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258698
    CS
    Participant

    DaMoshe

    “ CS, again, as I said earlier, it’s not “well known” that R’ Chaim met Mashiach. It’s one person who claimed R’ Chaim said it to him.”

    Interesting. So the response of the Litvishe world to what I thought was well known is to doubt it? Was the person who said it reputable?

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258701
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty, apparently some of my posts last night were posted after your new queries, so hopefully the answers will have come through above. I hope all your questions were answered, please lmk if not

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258700
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    I don’t know you personally, what I do know is that you have a bitter bias against Chabad, so unfortunately I cannot take your word that you heard (and you’ve never said you were in 770, somehow I don’t picture you at a farbrengen). I hope you understand

    About your second point about Eretz Yisrael being the safest place, the way I appreciate it is that because there is no sar appointed to Eretz Yisrael, everything there is not just hashgocha protis, but very very pinpointed. Like on simchas Torah, got many stories were there of people who davened or took on one Mitzvah, and were inexplicably saved? When I was there, I felt it. I hadn’t experienced an atmosphere of a place beforehand, but I felt it there.

    And yes, there may have been an extremely limited number of people who died from side effects, but the natural death occurrences elsewhere (traffic accidents) were probably higher than the supernaturally minuscule number of tragedies.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258699
    CS
    Participant

    Ca
    “ You along with the notzrim

    A second coming……”

    I hope you agree with the notzrim that we should await Moshiachs coming every day. Oh and believe in Moshiach to begin with. Otherwise…

    What the notzrim believe or not doesn’t make something treif. It’s whether it’s Torah or not. The notzrim are wrong first and foremost because yoshke was a rasha and was never fit to be Moshiach to begin with.

    Now I don’t think there’s any Torah sources for someone who started the job, and didn’t finish/ was killed or otherwise thwarted, to continue to consider them Moshiach.

    The debate is if someone started and, at least to our eyes, passed away, but their work and personal influence continue, what then? There’s room to say (and the Rebbe actually wrote this about the Frierdiker Rebbe) that he could then have techias hameisim with the first round of Tzaddikim (40 years earlier than
    the rest) and finish the job.

    I listed earlier in the thread, there are classical sources (rashi, Medrash, Rabbeinu Bachya, The Chasam Sofer) that say that Moshiach will start the job and then disappear for a period of time, and that this disappearance is a test of Emuna.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258697
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty
    “ You accused me of writing Loshon hora. Please present tangible example(s) of Halachic Loshon hora that I wrote.”

    Actually I said you accepted lashon hara, but you repeated it too so I guess that qualifies 😀.

    How about saying that The Rebbe said he’s god? Although the words may seem similar they are poolat and extreme opposites. If you don’t take the time to understand something serious properly, and then you parrot it, it’s actually not lashon hara, it’s motzei shem ra.

    Now you don’t understand it- that’s ok. I tried to put it very simply (did you see that post)? And it’s always best for complex matters to discuss it properly. You can call Rabbi Zajac for example.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258696
    CS
    Participant

    YK which two you turns are you talking about? I do my best to be honest

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258695
    CS
    Participant

    “ Apples and oranges ”

    Mr mod, while I admire your admirable approving/ editing, I disagree with you here. It’s not just about the Rebbe being Moshiach (and he claimed his father in law as such…) it’s also about Nevuah (he showed how nevuah was present by all Rebbeim.) in other words, anything atypical. I should add the reverence the Chassidim have naturally, seeing who the Rebbe was and is, is called avoda zara even though all the original sources on the topic describe the way one should view his Rebbe exactly as we do. (Think Rambam, Pirkei Avos etc)

    Hence the natural conclusion is that this particular crowd of Jews is not used to being exposed to things beyond the realm of nature (whereas that was the expected with the Rebbe.) Which leads to the attitude in this demographic of, if it’s not what I’m used to/ what’s typical, it must be wrong/ person must be arrogant / misleading etc etc etc

    You a sorely misunderstanding the conversation 

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258456
    CS
    Participant

    Btw all of this has taken on practical importance to me in the past few days. Seeing the hostage release proposal, which is below stupid seeing that we have experience from the shalit deal (sinwar was released then), October 7, etc etc, and then looking around the government/ parties to see who would be best to pin hopes on leading Eretz Yisraels security so as to be a keili for Hashems miracles… And there’s literally no one.

    The not frum crumble under the vast internal and international pressure (just look at this hostage plan from the best smooth talking diplomat).

    The frum don’t really mix into Israel’s security, and mainly focus on frum matters such as the draft etc. Many of them were also told by their Rabbonim to support the withdrawal from gush katif, oslo etc. which we all see what it has led to.

    We had a religious Zionist who also made incredible compromises of values.

    There’s really no one. The only one who pushed the formulas which have been successful in EY, advised countless security members including Prime Ministers, effectively, and was proven right every time was The Rebbe. The Rebbe pushed for shleimus Haaretz (no giving away our land both because it’s ours and for security), shleimus haam (fought for Mihu Yehudi) and shleimus HaTorah (without the hundreds of shluchim in EY, the so called chilonim would not be as Mitzvah observant as they are- shabbos candles, kashrus, Yomim Tovim, not to mention baalei teshuvah etc etc etc)

    He also advised on how to counter international pressure.

    The Rebbe could also unite the people around him as he is well loved by many disparate populations there.

    Really, all there is to do is to daven that the first stage of techias hameisim happen ASAP (Tzaddikim rise earlier), with Moshiach with them, and finish off the job he started.

    Agav, Chabad cannot otherwise be part of the government, because the policy is to stay apolitical to be able to unite all yidden around Torah and Mitzvos. There have been one or two exceptions but this is the policy.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258446
    CS
    Participant

    Forgot to say a gutte voch from my locality

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258444
    CS
    Participant

    Just for everyone’s info: taking a public stance
    comes with liability. My father was a Bochur during the gulf war, and the lubavitch bochurim would go to the rooftops during sirens and watch the scuds explode. The Rebbe promised…

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258443
    CS
    Participant

    Arso I looked up צפונות שנה on Hebrew books as you suggested. No such sefer there.

    Mod: “Rav Chaim saying he met moshiach is not ‘same here’ to claiming he is moshiach.”

    Of course not, but it seems the problem here is that people don’t believe anyone saying anything out of the ordinary, and think that if they do, they must be delusional, arrogant and fooled their followers. Hence my bringing in Rav Chaim Kanievsky, the Sar HaTorah (better DaMoshe?) of the Litvish world. As far as I know, it isn’t common to claim to have met Moshiach, and he has passed away since. So I’m curious how people take that- the same ones who are so incredulous about Chabad.

    Apples and oranges 

    in reply to: What 50 Shadchanim Told Me #2258434
    CS
    Participant

    Gutte voch from my locality. Gezh last names are usually known. If your last name is Johnson etc, you’re not. The whole lubavitch is connected so easy to find out who’s who.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258208
    CS
    Participant

    Btw regarding Rav Kanievsky, it’s well known he claimed to have met Moshiach. Having heard that he was a serious Talmid Chacham, Gaon etc I take that at face value. I’m curious if all the scoffers here scoff at their own Rabbi too? And say he must be arrogant and delusional cvs to say such a thing? Or they only scoff when it comes to lubavitch? I don’t think anyone demanded proof or outside sources to prove he want some sort of delusional rasha etc as a few here insinuate.

    He said what he said and is up to you to believe him. You believe him if you know him to be a legit person. Same here

    Rav Chaim saying  he met moshiach is not ‘same here’ to claiming he is moshiach.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258206
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty,

    “I should have made my point more clearly. Hashem gave Moshe signs that had been passed down from Yaakov and Yosef. He brought those signs to the Gedolei Hador and they recognized him as the Goel Tzedek. The Rebbe made up signs that he gave to his followers. If the Rebbe actually had communication with Hashem then he should have gone yo the Gedolim to get Haskamah. It’s quite obvious why he didm’t choose that tack”

    Qwerty, The Rebbe wasn’t trying to prove anything to anyone. As I said there’s a three stage process, and at this point, The Rebbe was only interested on letting those strongly connected to him, know. The stage of Moshiach Vadai hasn’t happened yet. The preliminary stage is about the people deciding who is a candidate, for Moshiach with their Rabbanim etc.

    BH we are blessed with many towering Rabbanim- I have a personal connection with 6 myself. Rav Schochet who just passed away is irreplaceable: he had some level of ruach hakodesh himself- he was instructed by The Rebbe to give brochos on Shmini Atzeres every year- and in his brochos- would actually tell them how their year would go, and he would deal with things that others didn’t feel they had a handle on- say- people who were possessed but otherwise mentally well, and interpreting dreams. Obviously in addition to all the regular stuff.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258205
    CS
    Participant

    Arso, interesting admit Rav Chaim Kanievsky. I saw a newspaper clipping from the period- it ran a headline on the Rebbes claim- it didn’t say several Torah leaders including the Lubavitcher Rebbe claim…

    Was he public about it?

    Secondly, you have homework now: (I’ve saved mine from the other day): 1. Proof that The Rebbe said not one Jew will die

    2. Proof for your claim that indeed two Jews died directly from the rockets

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258203
    CS
    Participant

    Btw I can agree with qwerty on yedios in rashi:
    The Rashi Sichos are quite spectacular:
    The Rebbe lists up to 20 questions on a Rashi.

    He gives the answers given by various mefarshei Rashi.

    He shows how the answers given are inadequate.

    Then he gives one answer which shows the Rashi in a completely different light. It also automatically answers all the up to 20 questions listed in the beginning.

    Sometimes it stops there, but my favorite is when he adds יינה של תורה- the lesson for life that The Rebbe found within the same Rashi.

    My favorite (I haven’t learned all of them) is the 6-8 page sicha on the seemingly very simple Rashi: ועשו לי: לי לשמי בית קדושה and the incredible horaah bachayim at the end.

    Qwerty, the Rebbe did maintain geula will be for every Jew. Firstly, I don’t know if you’re aware, but even a nevuah that is negative can be nullified if people do teshuva etc. Secondly, the Rebbe certainly had sources of his own to prove the opposite. If you’re really interested, you can find the topic listed in the sefer שערי גאולה- ימות המשיח. It should just the relevant sources as well.

    The Rebbe never said, the Gemara says this but I know better cvs.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258202
    CS
    Participant

    To YB: You say you’ve learned the shoftim 51 sicha. Did you look up the sources quoted and see the context etc? Ie Did you learn it properly? Secondly, are there things there that are wrong/ misquoted etc? Yes Chabad are unique: we focus our Avodas Hashem on building Him a home He’ll be comfortable with, in this world, which will be revealed to all when Moshiach comes. This is a Medrash Tanchuma, brought as a central theme in Tanya and elaborated on by all the Rebbeim after. This isn’t wrong, it’s just different.

    You reference the Rebbes statement that Avodas habirurim has been finished. Have you asked any Lubavitcher what that means? Or at least looked up the footnotes? The Rebbe elaborates on many themes throughout the Sichos, and refers to them in shorthand in others. That’s why me and my husband each have a weekly kevius of a year of Sichos we’re learning week after week so we can properly understand the depth, and see the build up of concepts. It sounds like you just opened the sicha to confirm to yourself that Chabad is crazy, read a few lines or maybe the whole sicha with a cursory reading, and slammed it shut- mission accomplished.

    There’sa saying of the Rebbe Maharash: the only one fooled by a fool is a fool, and what’s the accomplishment of fooling a fool?

    Feel free to correct if the above is not as stated.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258144
    CS
    Participant

    Btw regarding a sign, during the period of the gulf war the Rebbe referenced the yalkut shimoni talking about how in the year Melech HaMoshiach will reveal himself, the Persian king will start up with the Aram king (the Rebbe saw this as the American king) and the Jews will be scurrying in fear (as they were in light of the threats of Saddam Hussein- which only recently did we see just how big they were), and Moshiach will tell them, humble ones, the time of your redemption has arrived!

    The Rebbe told everyone who asked there’s nothing to fear and you should not leave EY, and indeed the war turned out the way the Rebbe said. And he was the only one saying so, publicly assuring everyone. Yeah that was one of the things I was talking about in 5751

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258143
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty, I’m sorry, I didn’t realize you haven’t seen a sicha before. A sicha has many many footnotes frum many other sources in the Torah, think of it as a compilation of Torah sources on the given subject with the Rebbe tying it all together and bringing out a few chiddushim, as any Gaon would do. I referenced the sicha because you’ll see the many sources on
    the topic you mentioned, and you can look it all up yourself. Opening a sicha does not mean that you’re just reading and believing something that’s all the Rebbes imagination. Sorry I had thought you were familiar.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258145
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty which Gemaras did he reflect in favor of his ideas? You mean in an area where Kabbala differs? Or a different Gemara shows it differently? Curious what you’re talking about

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258115
    CS
    Participant

    It wasn’t meant as a personal dig- qwerty has posted many times that he cannot understand Hebrew sources. I think it’s not nice you’re taking a fact of life and pinning it as a personal dig on my end. Assuming that’s what you were referring to

    in reply to: What 50 Shadchanim Told Me #2258072
    CS
    Participant

    And like I said, that’s inaccurate. The person’s values are always first to those who care about gezh.
    Then, some see it as a priority to marry those from similar backgrounds. Many don’t. Those who are more modern don’t really care at all. There are even marriages in Chabad where the shliach became mechutanim with the mekurav (I think the first was in Italy.) sholom Mordechai rubashkin is gezh- his aishes chayil is a bt. Choni milecki is a son of bts- he married gezh. These are well known names you may have heard but there are plenty plenty more. People would have a hard time marrying ffb if they are bt, which is completely understandable. But children of bts can go either way. Some families would prefer to marry gezh and some don’t care. As a child of bts I highly respect some gezh families, some who would consider children of bts and some who wouldn’t. These families are inclusive of bts in every way, and there is absolutely no difference or hierarchy in school, teaching positions etc, but they would prefer their kids marry similar background which I totally understand. A bt home cannot compare to a sincere gezh home that has been Chassidim for generations. Bts have their own maalos which gezh don’t, and some families are open to it and some not. In either case, preferring your child marry a similar family background is not shallow, considering there are authentic reasons behind it. And definitely not comparable to a guy putting physical attributes at the top of his list.

    But other

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258070
    CS
    Participant
    1. Sorry qwerty for the delay. If you wish to understand the whole topic of Nevuah returning before Moshiach, I can refer you to the sicha of parshas shoftim 5751. Of course don’t just learn the sicha, but look up the copious footnotes on every page of sources. You can ask any of your Chabad rabbi friends to learn it with you, but really, you can learn it with anyone who can learn sources inside. Of course I’d love to hear your reaction when you’re finished. Do keep us posted!  personal dig edited
    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258046
    CS
    Participant

    Ctlawyer- you don’t have to worry about qwerty and Chabad too much. He davens in a Chabad shul and is an avid admirer of rabbi Zajac, a Chabad rabbi in California. He loves the Rebbes Torah too as well. Unfortunately, because he takes lashon hara about Chabad at face value, he’s chosen to believe some misinterpretations by outsiders of Chabad teachings.
    Therefore he enjoys spending free time as a holy warrior against Chabad.

    Of course if he really believed the drivel he writes against us, he wouldn’t have so many close personal associations with Chabad. I think he’s in it for the fun.

    Qwerty feel free to correct on any of the above

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258043
    CS
    Participant

    Arso- I’m sorry for confusion- my two posts were posted out of order.

    If you reread, you will see that the Yerushalmi interprets the posuk as referring to every Jew, while others interpret it as referring to Moshiach. There is another outside source The Rebbe often brings which says that any Torah interpretations on the same words are related. I don’t remember it offhand but can post the next time I see it. Hence from the above, the Rebbe concludes that the connection is that every Jew possesses a spark of Moshiach which is why the same words refer to both.

    Thanks for posting your source. I’ll look into it iyH. I saw something interested last night regarding how matrilineal lives are ok- because apparently Rebbi was descended from Dovid HaMelech through his mother. I’m still waiting to see the source inside myself. Will keep you posted if of interest iyH

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257810
    CS
    Participant

    I vote ctlawyers comment as the most sensible in this page, and Damoshes as the funniest. Further questions will be addressed at my next opportunity. Arso, you sure you can’t find a source for what you’re saying about the Maharal like the many you ask I bring? I saw online on a frum site, a contemporary book written ostensibly proving that the Zohar is no good. You can find many ridiculous things online.
    There was a nigle source for the spark of Moshiach- I don’t remember offhand, but will be happy to try and locate it again. It was a mefaresh on parshas bilam

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257828
    CS
    Participant

    Had a minute- Arso:

    In one of the prophecies of Bilaam it is written,6 דרך כוכב מיעקב — “A star shall go forth from Jacob.” In one of its tractates, the Talmud Yerushalmi7 explains that this phrase is an allusion to the King Mashiach. Elsewhere,8 the Talmud Yerushalmi explains it as an allusion to every individual Jew. (The Talmud there relates that a certain gentile once dreamed that he had swallowed a star; it transpired that he had killed a Jew, for the Jews are likened to stars.)

    These two interpretations are related, for within every single Jew there is a spark of Mashiach.

    Footnote 8: Maaser sheni 4:6 (in Talmud bavli)

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257669
    CS
    Participant

    Arso, I wrote in my post that every Jews identity is really one with atzmus (realizing this and internalizing this is different for different people.)

    In perek 42 of Tanya the Alter Rebbe explains about every Jew containing a spark of Moshe. I believe we’ve been through this. This doesn’t contradict- someone like a Rebbe- embodies Moshe more and regular people can t tap into it on their level. Same with Moshiach- there’s the one big Moshiach, and the spark of Moshiach in every yid

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257668
    CS
    Participant

    Arso, I’ve listed the Rebbes yichus up to the Maharal. Do you have a source you can list/ refer to on sefaria etc, that backs up what you’re saying about the Maharal?

    I don’t have any knowledge other than the Maharal was miyuchas to Beis Dovid, feel free to provide.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257666
    CS
    Participant

    Arso, I’m glad that other groups are also aiming for the same levels. Beinoni is a description of a level and so is low level tzadik. No one in lubavitch aims to Crown themselves with these titles. That’s ridiculous- opposite of bitul etc.

    I wish I could hear more of these aspirations in other groups. Personally I have met some really sincere ovdei Hashem in other groups. One I know of- but I can’t really read her so to speak. The other person I encountered seemed very ehrlich but I wouldn’t get into unnecessary discussion with the opposite gender in person.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257667
    CS
    Participant

    I do think that there are sincere ovdim in every group, however I find Chassidus Chabad lifts someone to a different level, so their sincerity is likewise elevated to a level they may not have aimed for beforehand. Feel free to show me otherwise.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257665
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty your latest posts are what you have decided did or did not happen in lubavitch over Lubavitcher Chassidim.
    So there’s nothing to say…

    in reply to: What 50 Shadchanim Told Me #2257575
    CS
    Participant

    Avira, there are many such marriages in Chabad. There are some families that put a similar family background as one priority, and that’s better than putting physical characteristics. Maybe look into your facts before you present them:). I also know of many more modern Chabad who would put looks as a top thing. There are plenty of shallow people everywhere, but the ones who strive to be chassidim, will put their priorities in the proper order. Because they’re a different type of people than the shallow minded ones, not because they think they’re settling for second class.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257574
    CS
    Participant

    Just for the sake of qwerty I’ll try to explain the Atzmus thing in simple terms. If you learn Tanya perek 6, it says that only something which is nullified/ batul, to Hashem can become included the category of kedusha. Chassidus teaches that Hashem Echad means that everything should realize that its true self and existence is from Hashem/ one with Hashem. The more batul and humble a person lives, the more kedusha they can channel. The Gemara also says that Hashem can’t a dwell with an arrogant person. Chassidus takes it further that there is no other existence other than Hashem (all of creation is Hashem’s speech which is one with Him from His perspective, so we just need to realize this and love this way.)

    So, someone like a true Rebbe can even channel Atzmus- a person can sense this kedusha when they interact with the tzadik who has converted his yetzer hara to be another positive force (Dovid hamelech did this, and anyone who is a tzadik gamur of Tanya can too.) Really, the true existence of every yid is actually one with Hashem’s Essence, which is why we won’t have an identity crisis when Hashem is revealed by geula, whereas goyim will.

    Obviously, a”z can’t come in the picture here, because if someone speaks from their own ego etc, they’re not channeling any kedusha in that moment. What’s more, they’re clearly not what Chabad would consider a Rebbe, Rosh Bnei Yisrael, because they still have unpolished yeshus/ yetzer hara to deal with.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257573
    CS
    Participant

    Btw if you want to see current stories and experiences of people with The Rebbe, you can visit rebbestory dot org. There’s Lubavitchers and non Lubavitchers on there alike. I just saw a new story today with someone from an anti Chabad background.

    And all the great awe, respect and trust we give The Rebbe- The Rebbe, at the end of the day is only Hashem’s servant and messenger. So you can imagine the depth of understanding about Hashem that Chassidus provides. וי׳הי מורא רבך כמורא שמים

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257566
    CS
    Participant

    Regarding bchezkas moshiach- some Lubavitcher Rabbanim hold that the chazaka was broken by Gimmel Tammuz. Others maintain that it so holds. Both have their sources. Additionally, before Gimmel Tammuz there was a psak din signed by also non lubavitch Rabbanim on the Rebbe being Moshiach. Here’s the kicker: it’s still active and there are activists visiting many different Rabbanim etc, going through the sources, and gathering signatures. I don’t think it’s available for the public, but I know it’s rabbi lipsh in EY who’s one of these activists, and I reached out myself about it at some point.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257565
    CS
    Participant

    Since it’s of interest, here’s some sources to enjoy:

    ot rooted in reality?
    משיח נגלה ונכסה וחוזר ונגלה
    אשרי המחכה וגו’. ארבעים וחמש שנים נוספים על חשבון העליון שעתיד משיחנו להתכסות אחר שנגלה וישוב ויתגלה. וכן מצינו במדרש רות, וכן יסד רבי אליעזר הקליר )בסילוקיוצרפרשתהחדש(ויתכסהמהם ְשבּוִעיםששה.
    (רש”י דניאל יב, יב)

    משיח יתכסה כגואל הראשון
    ויהיה הגואל נגלה וחוזר ונכסה כדי להתעות את העכו”ם ולהקשות את לבם, שכן מצינו בגאולת מצרים שנגלה להם משה וחזר ונכסה מהם, וזהו שדרשו רבותינו ז”ל: ויפגעו את משה ואת אהרן, אחר ששה חדשים נגלה הקב”ה במדין וא”ל: לך שוב מצרימה, בא משה ממדין ואהרן ממצרים ופגעו בהם שוטרי ישראל כשהם יוצאים מלפני פרעה. וכן דרשו במדרש חזית: דומה דודי לצבי, מה צבי זה הוא נראה ונכסה וחוזר ונראה, כן גואל הראשון נראה להם וחזר ונכסה מהם וחזר ונראה להם. וכמה נכסה מהם, רבי תנחומא אומר שלשה חדשים, הדא הוא דכתיב ויפגעו את משה ואת אהרן. רבי יהודה ב”ר אומר ללריסין, כלומר לשון פגיעה לפרקין היא. וכן הגואל העתיד יהיה נגלה וחוזר ונכסה, שהרי גאולה זו עתידה
    (רבינו בחיי פר’ ויחי עמ’ מד)

    להיות כדמיון גאולת מצרים בהרבה ענינים.
    נסיון גדול
    וזה נסיון גדול שנעלם הגואל ששה חדשים, וכן יהי’ בימי משיח צדקינו, יהי’ נעלם אחר התגלות כדאיתא במדרש וה’ יעמוד לימין הצדיקים בבי”א.
    (תורת משה פר’ שמות)

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257564
    CS
    Participant

    Litvishe fellow: by nisyonos, numbers weren’t a factor. Chet haegel only one Shevet came through completely from all of the men. The women all passed. We don’t decide what’s right based on numbers. We trust our Rebbe, a tremendous tzadik and Gaon etc, who was the final one in a glorious line of Chabad Rebbeim. W are not the only ones who hold of the Rebbe so- and this is well documented. If people don’t see the Rebbe that way, there’s nothing to discuss as we have no common ground here.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257561
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty
    “Being humble doezn’t mean refusing to do what Hashem wants because you feel unworthy. Being humble means that a person accomplishes a tremendous amount but he recognizes that it’s all thanks to Hashem”

    Exactly. So if Hashem informed the Rebbe that he has been appointed as Moshiach, and should start on his mission, and let those close to him in on it, why does that bother you that he did exactly that?

    “In 1951 the Rebbe announced he’s Moshiach. In 1962 he announced he’s god.”

    The first was not an announcement but hints given for a reason. The second is pure slander and falsehood. Sechel and Menachem Shmei did their best to explain the concept in their own ways, I think I may have explained as well- if you don’t understand it, doesn’t mean you publicly slander

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257558
    CS
    Participant

    Litvishe fellow- the whole Torah world is not missing the boat. When the geula comes along with Moshiach’s full revelation, no Jew will be left behind. For now this is still an internal lubavitch thing, probably meant to show us that Moshiach is really coming in our time and motivate us further to reshape the world in the Rebbes vision. I’ve actually never brought this up to non Lubavitchers and very rarely Lubavitchers, but seeing that this if the favorite line of discussion in this forum I would advise all Lubavitchers to simply answer, “Yes. Any other questions?” In the future

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257480
    CS
    Participant

    To the group

    “The Gemara says that there were three great people Dovid, Avraham and Moshe. Dovid called himself a worm. Avraham said he’s dirt and ashes. Moshe was the greatest, he said he’s nothing. What did the Rebbe say about himself? I’m the Gadol Hador. Compare the Rebbe to Moshe Rabbeinu? I don’t think so.“

    All these ones who says they’re nothing didn’t refuse their mission. Moshe didn’t refuse to get the Torah, Dovid didn’t refuse to become the king and’s ancestor of moshiach, Avraham didn’t refuse to start Hashem’s nation. Maybe toe confused on humility? Just as an aside, in Gemara the Amoraim we’re discussing that no one is truly humble anymore and one of them stood up and said it’s not true because he’s humble. No one scoffed. Do you know what humility is?

    In any case the Rebbe never said “I am the (full in the blank)

    in reply to: What 50 Shadchanim Told Me #2257489
    CS
    Participant

    And another friend married someone who is only half an inch taller. When asked if she was bothered, she said, she was surprised as she didn’t think it was something significant.

    At the end of the day, the person we marry is a package deal, and will not be perfect. No one ideally skills feel they aren’t excited to marry the person they marry. It’s a matter of what’s priority

    The formula we follow in Chabad is:

    1) compatible Yiras shomayim/ values
    2) hamshachas halev- attraction, which can be to personality, chemistry or looks. Basically more than feelings of basic ahavas Yisrael to the person
    Which is why in many cases, it is silly to reject someone for attraction reasons based on a description or photo which doesn’t take into account charm and personality

    in reply to: What 50 Shadchanim Told Me #2257488
    CS
    Participant

    I actually know of a friend who agreed to meet donating whose foot was amputated for machla, because she had learned that some people have obvious blemishes and some concealed. She was willing to meet him and they’rea special wonderful couple on shlichus. Those kind of messages are helpful

    in reply to: What 50 Shadchanim Told Me #2257487
    CS
    Participant

    Agreed. GDH, ideally, no one should feel they’ve settled for something less then. However, putting physical attributes at the top of the list is shallow. I know of marriages where one side either didn’t ask for a picture, and ended up finding his bigger sized wife attractive because of her chein or personality. I know of a woman who met a young man and found him unattractive but went out with him a few more times until values/ personality etc overrode her initial reaction and it didn’t bother her anymore. Both couples are bH married. If someone makes a shopping list of all preferences for physical attributes as the top thing on their list, that’s shallow. Hopefully they’ll meet someone likeminded and shallow that works for them, or they’ll miss many potential good matches

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257482
    CS
    Participant

    Just curious: if I was aiming for gan Eden there’s at least one gemara that says that as long as I’m over 50% of doing the right thing, I’m good to go.

    That’s a pretty low bar. I’m hoping everybody here reached that at least soon after bar or Bas Mitzvah.

    One of the many things I love about Chabad is that it shows you how low you are, how much work you need to do, but yet how high you can reach, in an empowering way.

    So, the starting point of real Avodas Hashem is to become a beinoni (someone who controls their every thought speech and action to be within the boundaries of Mutar etc) (otherwise you can’t truly rule your heart as a result of being a rasha.) But don’t worry. Even if you’re -30 steps, as long as you’re growing that’s great and you’ll be provided with international motivation and encouragement, credits due to Chassidus, to keep working your way up. Once you get there, it’s a whole new life, you don’t need to live with guilt etc. And it just gets better. Oh I forgot, the bar was upped to becoming at least a low level tzadik (someone who actually experiences love of Hashem palpably and disgust of evil) because our Nefesh habehamis is more refined today.

    Honestly is there any other derech in Yiddishkeit today which expects so much (so you never feel done) and yet is so empowering and positive? I’d love to hear. See sources. People’s experiences etc

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257481
    CS
    Participant

    yb
    You’d do well to read the rashi towards the end of last weeks parsha which spells out how one should relate to their Torah leaders…

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257478
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty
    “I appreciate the fact that you respond to my comments in a non-confrontational manner.”

    Thank you

    “ I also appreciate that you understand that none of your beliefs resonate at all with non-Lubavichers. You think that we’ve failed the test by not accepting your false Messiah, but you will have a much greater test which is to accept the real one. As for the comparison of the Rebbe and Moshe Rabbeinu. No human being who has ever lived can be compared to the greatest man the world has ever known.”

    Firstly, I don’t think this test applies to you. This is for Lubavitchers whom The Rebbe was addressing. If you’d like a test, daven like you mean it when the nusach hatefilla asks for Moshiach’s coming, on a daily basis. Is that a good challenge? Maybe you’re past that already- if so don’t just daven for geula but for moshiach.

    Rashi (Hosheia 3:4-5)
    R’ Shimon bar Yochai said: “The Jewish nation despised three things in the days of Rechovam, 1) the Kingdom of Heaven, 2) the Kingdom of Dovid, and 3) The Bais Hamikdosh.” Said R’ Shimon ben Menasya: “The signs of Redemption will not be shown to Israel until they ​return and seek all three of them​.”

    Good?

    Also the Zohar says there’s an extension of Moshe in every generation. Obviously we hold off the Rebbe as such. You’re welcome to follow whatever Torah leader you like

    in reply to: What 50 Shadchanim Told Me #2257456
    CS
    Participant

    Taanis 3a is discussing Eliezer where the primary importance was middos. The criticism was that he didn’t mention anything about her physical state (she could have been lame or blind.) If middos were put first and primary, and then looks included afterwards (ideas weight isn’t mentioned, let alone more superficial preferences), then this discussion wouldn’t be happening

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257449
    CS
    Participant

    Regarding the question conversation: I don’t think I’ve done it justice. See igeres hakodesh siman chof vov (post of Tanya. You’ll need explanation- you can find lessons of Tanya on it)

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2257417
    CS
    Participant

    Sorry if I could just come in. No Lubavitcher school starts a niggun when someone has a question. A niggun of a tzadik led by a tzadik can do that in exceptional situations. On the contrary Chabad means we engage with the mind.

    Questions do come from a lack of clarity. That is why in nigle sources, which deal with clarifying good/ evil etc. there’s many more questions than in Nistar, which is only about achdus Hashem (no matters involving tumah etc).

    In golus, we ask many questions. In geula, we will learn in a way of seeing- things will be much clearer.

    However, if one does have a question, obviously ask, or, ain habayshon lameid. Asking is great!

Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 1,901 total)