CS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 251 through 300 (of 1,901 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261911
    CS
    Participant

    Arso- not that I doubt it- he actually just went to the trouble of photographing about 6 pages of scholarly research about the Rebbes yichus- but that I know it’s not about answers with you. So I’m glad that it is addressed in that sefer, and maybe some other time I’ll take it further.

    Yes I quoted the Gemara, and yes we were discussing. But you brought sources on the Rashi- (the Rashi itself merely lists the two kgons- shades of/ examples, and you’re deciding to read it like the interpretation that it means it can only be these two. Which I don’t have to do that. And even so, taking it further – it would seem even according to that- that that only applies to that very generation. So yes, there’s the Ramban, and yes there’s the explicit Gemara, The sdei chemed, abarbanel etc etc. And the Rebbe about his father in law which didn’t seem to be any issue before Gimmel Tammuz because I probably would have heard of it.

    Yes the 2 hostages families took on hachlotos, when urged to by shluchim. Guess where that inspiration came from?

    And yes I think it is horrible to make a ceasefire- there could have been another way for them to be released as just happened. Fact is though- there has never been such a “good” ceasefire and terrorist exchange rate ever- feel free to correct me. I guess my point with this was that the Rebbes influence is definitely alive and well today, as will continue to be until we finish this golus forever.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261910
    CS
    Participant

    Yb- post b

    *בחיצוניות רק למראה עינים*

    דער גאנצער ענין קומט נאר צוליב דעם וואס דער אויבערשטער בחסדו הגדול האט געוואלט ברענגען אידן צו אן עלי’ הכי גדולה )העכער ווי מצבם מצ”ע(, דעריבער איז הכי גדולה “עלילה נתלה בו” און עס ווערט א ירידה לפי שעה )ע”ד מש”נ “ברגע קטן עזבתיך”( ובחיצוניות )נאר למראית עינים(, בכדי ברענגען די עלי’ שלא בערך, און ניט נאר אן עלי’ לרגע קטן )כנגד “רגע קטן עזבתיך”(, נאר אן עלי’ נצחית שאין אחרי’ הפסק כלל. ווי עס וועט זיין בגאולה האמיתית והשלימה – וואס קומט דורך דער ירידה גדולה אין גלות – א
    (ש”פ כי תשא ה’תשנ”ב, ספר השיחות ח”ב עמ’431)
    גאולה נצחית שאין אחרי’ גלות.

    This first source was said shortly before The Rebbes stroke.

    *נסיון דור הגאולה*

    הרבי פעם אמר לאחד ביחידות: “לפני הגאולה האמיתית והשלמה יחזור על עצמו פעם נוספת אותו ‘נסיון’ שערך אליהו הנביא בהר הכרמל )מלכים א, פי”ח( כאשר כל ישראל נתאספו יחדיו, ואליהו גער בהם: “עד מתי אתם פוסחים על שתי הסעיפים? אם ה’ האלקים
    לכו אחריו, ואם )ח”ו( הבעל – לכו אחריו.
    לאחו מכן נערך ה”מבחן”: “ויתנו לנו שנים פרים, ויבחרו להם הפר האחד, וינתחוהו, וישימו על העצים, ואש לא ישימו, ואני אעשה את הפר האחד, ונתתי על העצים, ואש לא אשים. וקראתם בשם אלקיכם, ואני אקרא בשם ה׳. והיה האלקים אשר יענה באש הוא האלקים”, ולבסוף, למרות כל תחבולות נביאי הבעל, לא ירדה להם האש, ואילו לצד הקדושה ירדה אש מן השמים “ותאכל את העולה, ואת העצים ואת האבנים ואת העפר, ואת המים אשר בתעלה לחכה וירא כל העם, ויפלו על פניהם ויאמרו: ה׳ הוא האלקים! ה׳ הוא
    האלקים!
    לקראת הגאולה, אמר הרבי, יחזור על עצמו שוב אותו סיפור – אך בהבדל אחד: האש תרד דוקא לצידם של נביאי הבעל, לצד אלו שטענו כלפי הנביא כי הוא “עוכר ישראל” כמסופר שם, ולא לצד הקדושה…
    וזה יהיה ה”מבחן” והנסיון האחרון של בני ישראל, שלמרות זאת הם לא יתבלבלו ולא ילכו ח”ו אחרי “הבעל”, אלא יכריזו יחדיו, מתוך אמונה איתנה ובטחון גמור: “ה’ הוא האלקים, ה’ הוא האלקים…”

    (‘והוא יגאלנו’ עמ’ 109)

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261909
    CS
    Participant

    Gutte voch from my locality! I hope you’ll forgive my untimely responses, as this convo keeps on going, I’ve decided to drop in more occasionally…

    Hope I don’t miss out anyone. Starting with YB, as I said I was born after, but just by seeing Lubavitch today, I think you have your answer. How many Lubavitchers on this very site have clutched their head in their hands, and called me an “embarrassment” etc. because I’m openly sharing what I’ve learned from the Rebbes sichos, even though Chas Veshalom they would never call the Rebbe this way, and even call me a hater for suggesting so… how many have denied everything to do with the Rebbe being Moshiach, even in publications, when it’s literally in the print of the sichos?

    I think the answer is quite simple. The Rebbe was so down to earth, and “normal”. Just look at his shluchim. Not every shliach is the top 10% of Lubavitch, yet the Rebbe empowered them to share what they have. Yet, together with the normalcy, the Rebbe was definitely revolutionary. And it seems some people have a hard time living with both, so you have this kind of stuff going on…

    And yea, Chassidim will go and find their own proofs to support what the Rebbe said. I think the most telling thing is that in at least one of the Rebbes sichos that I am aware of, he said the Frierdiker Rebbe could still be Moshiach, because he could have techias hameisim with the first wave. So this actually isn’t something new.

    As to why it was “impossible” to end up this way- a) partly because there are sources also from the Rebbe about this generation going straight into chaim nitzchiim- So that does pose a seeming contradiction to Gimmel Tammuz- which is why the entire lubavitch refer to Gimmel Tammuz as such, and also why very few will say zia.

    But the main answer is that they were having bitachon that things wouldn’t end up this way.

    On that note: I’ll add in the next post a part b, very telling.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261382
    CS
    Participant

    Yb
    “n one post you claimed you were not aware of official Habad Policy before the Histalkus / Disappearance of 1994.
    In a subsequent post you claimed , you are well aware of it .”

    Depends what aspect you’re talking about, and if I’ve heard something once or twice or looked into something in depth.

    Be it as it may , the following question is very pertinent –

    “When will we get an unreserved acknowledgement that Official Habad made two major U-Turns in the last 60 – 70 years ?
    Or possibly , alternatively rephrased as “one Major U-Turn and one Great Deception” ?”

    What I know is (again I was born after) that the Rebbe started off the Nesius by saying that we are the seventh generation who’s job is to bring the Shechina back down to earth (just like Moshe- seventh from Avraham). And we’re not better than other generations- it’s just our mission as the lucky 7 (kol shviin chavivin.) the Rebbe will help us but he will not do the work for us.

    There was always an emphasis on bringing Moshiach. This was nothing new- the Frierdiker Rebbe had a campaign around the Holocaust time- lalter liteshuva lalter lGeula.

    Seeing the Rebbe as Moshiach of the generation is also nothing new. At least the third Lubavitcher Rebbe was held this way, and possibly many others. The Rebbe also referenced the Frierdiker Rebbe as Moshiach during the Rebbe’s nesius. (Another reason why Moshiach min hameisim is moot- if the Rebbe could say the Frierdiker Rebbe could have techias hameisim and come back with the first wave, what’s the issue?)

    As far as the Rebbe himself being called Moshiach- at first it was probably unheard of as the Rebbe was completely batul to his father in law. In time, with whatever communications the Rebbe received, he slowly began to reveal it to those closest to him, hence the change of position, but still didn’t feel this was suitable for the world at large. Later on that changed somewhat too. So this isn’ta series of flip flops rather a one way process.

    There is more to be said about how Gimmel Tammuz affected Chabad, and I’ll save that for my next time.

    “But , Please – please , Not by saying that the non habad world ALSO made a u- turn by initially [pre 94] opposing habad ‘candidacy’ for M , based on the premise that M comes from the dead . and somehow only now [after 94] insisting M only comes from the living.
    That’s a factual non starter …”

    To be honest, I have heard this more than once, and it probably has some basis- if you could give background from your end would be nice. I never looked into it yet

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261380
    CS
    Participant

    “And I know for a fact that what the Lubavicher rebbe advocated was that they learn only gemoro that is directly relevant to halochos that apply to women, not other stuff. (Note: I, and I’m sure many others on this thread, are against even that.)”

    Source for your fact?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261377
    CS
    Participant

    Just popping in. Glad to see the positive conversation regarding the Baal Shem Tov.

    Will respond to a few now (hopefully in order) and next at my next opportunity iyH.

    Avira- thanks for the exact translation of כגון
    Arso: I meant I found the name of a sefer that addresses the Ramban mentioned, but I’m going to give my source in this info a break so I’m not pressing it for now. In any case, aside from the Gemara, there’s the abarbanel and Sdei Chemed who refer to moshiach min hameisim positivelys well. Rashi is only one mefaresh on the Gemara and not Halacha lmaase. And then you’re arguing how to interpret the Rashi- 2 steps removed.

    Recently I called a Rav regarding a mefaresh on the Gemara that didn’t seem to fit with the theme I was writing on (it seemed unhealthy in attitude) and I wanted to understand how it fit in or if I was wrong in my approach. He assured me my approach was correct, and regarding the mefaresh- we don’t hold like that.

    The bottom line is that I asked a respected Lubavitcher Rav about the topic- he told me you can’t hold according to the Rambam bchezkas Moshiach, but you’re on solid Torah ground to believe the Rebbe is Moshiach regardless. So that’s it.

    Later I found out that there are others who disagree and are still garnering signatures from outside of lubavitch on the topic today. They bring the sources, the Rabbonim study them and many/ some do agree and sign.

    Regarding Argentina-no obviously a goy won’t be moshiach- point was that he heralds good news in line with geula (may it only continue!)

    Regarding more “typical” Rebbe brachos with these latest hostages, the article is up on VIN the day they were released.

    May I also add that the first (unprecedented) wave of hostages were released shortly after members of many hostages families flew from Israel (!) to NY and went to the Ohel.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260682
    CS
    Participant

    YB I do know about the major flip flop because I grew up in the wake of it. I don’t think you understand the nuance within Chabads position which are all based on the Rebbes sichos and sources: We hold that the best way is when the Nassi of the current dor who merits geula, is the final Moshiach- as his generation was the one who earned it. This is not the same as the classic Moshiach min hameisim, and obviously- clearly alive physically would be the most straightforward, ie be option a. Nobody was looking for an option b, pre Gimmel Tammuz, although the Rebbe alluded to it.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260676
    CS
    Participant

    DaMoshe I’m not going to respond at length as I think people here are bH sufficiently educated on chassidus in general, but just to make you aware, besides Achiya HaShiloni, the Baal Shem Tovs mentor was R Adam Baal Shem, who was preceded by R Yoel baal shem, whose teacher was R Eliyahu baal shem who was of the mekubali
    and had a Yeshiva in Worms. The ways of These Baal Shem were kept secret from the general population, except for their own students, and that’s why maybe you only heard of the Baal Shem Tov who was forced to reveal himself to the world at large on his 36th birthday

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260663
    CS
    Participant

    Arso: thanks for quoting it, although I seem to remember the Rashi as being quite short. In either case, it still says dugmaso- which is the same idea- an example. In that generation, the example of Moshiach min hachaim was Rebbi and min hameisim- Daniel. I don’t understand why you understand that Rebbi was only that generation but not subsequently, yet you don’t apply the same logic to Daniel. Just to flesh it out

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260638
    CS
    Participant

    Arso btw The Rebbe wanted the Lubavitchers girls high schools to learn Gemara. Although I only know of one that does. I don’t have a kevius in Gemara, as there’s plenty else for me to learn that’s more relevant to my mitzvos (including Chassidus) but I enjoy looking the many footnotes in the sichos/ maamarim etc referencing Gemara, and more often than not, I can bH translate a quote from Gemara when it does appear in a sicha. So I learn alot more Gemara on a regular basis than, say, Zohar. Zohar I don’t usually look up, unless I’m checking an article to make sure it’s an accurate quote. But I wouldn’t gain more clarity of Zohar by seeing the context. All the Zohar. Etz Chaim etc I know, is directly as is explained in Chassidus

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260639
    CS
    Participant

    With regards to the Ramban, I’m not aware of the name of a sefer that addresses it directly, but that’s it for now. I can look into it more thoroughly if you’d like. I just thought to start with the Gemara because that obviously predates the Ramban.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260640
    CS
    Participant

    *Now aware

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260642
    CS
    Participant

    Just for a light note, I saw a video today (actually one of two connected) how the President of Argentina davened by the kosel from the depths of his heart, and then two Argentinian hostages were rescued that night.

    Mr Jeremy Gimpel found a fascinating connection:

    Of the 4 names of the one who will herald the geula- the last send the most puzzling. The Gemara says it’ll be chivra dbei Rebbi- the white one (which I assume rashi says means a leper) of the house of Rebbi.

    So the Argentinian guys name is Chivra- or something similar, and he belongs to Beis Rebbi, as he is an avid student of The Rebbe 😀 (in fact his first trip abroad after winning the elections was to the ohel)

    May the miraculous events of today only get stronger and stronger, and may it indeed herald the geula, with only revealed good for Klal Yisrael from now on!

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260628
    CS
    Participant

    Mod thanks for explaining. I’m still not clear on what you meant. Are you saying that what I wrote (based on many posters here who hail from the litvish world) is false? That people don’t turn their noses up at Chabad (when that’s what I’m seeing repeatedly here)? No need to reply if you’re exasperated, I’m just confused as what you find to be motzei shem ra.

    Arso, quoting the rashi from memory, feel free to check up, it doesn’t זה, it says, כגון which to the best of my knowledge means For example:. For example doesn’t mean the Gemara is only referring to this person, it means someone like this person. And it uses the same word כגון, to the best of my recollection, both for the dead and for the live. Obviously, we cannot limit the live to Rebbi, and similarly the dead.

    Hope that is clear

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260629
    CS
    Participant

    Regarding flip flopping two ways, interesting. I’ve only gotten vague info on the pre Gimmel Tammuz era on how the “outside” world reacted and why, haven’t looked into it much, and wasn’t around then

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260374
    CS
    Participant

    Btw for those who actually want to understand that one quote they keep fixating on about Atzmus, would do well to learn shaar hayichud vhoemuna (part 2 of Tanya, not overly long), and perek Beis of Tanya (part 1). If you’ve done both, and are actually interested in understanding, we can talk. I’ve written it out simply for this format several times. And I think Menachem Shmei posted a yy Jacobson shiur on it.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260373
    CS
    Participant

    Well I appreciate that mod. I have seen it on this forum as well with the constant fixation on the same sicha, ignoring the answers given while maintaining the same assurance that is wrong, blanket statements against Chabad, comparing Chabad to a different religion etc, and I haven’t really seen a stand against it. So I’m happy to hear from you as an insider that you don’t think this is the general case, if I’m understanding you correctly.

    Personally I appreciate this opportunity to connect
    with and understand fellow frum Jews from all stripes, which I don’t have on a day to day basis unfortunately.

    I’ll give this one last shot – My disclaimer is on your post only. The comments posters have expressed about your hashkofa can be taken up with them. My comment to you was that your post was so full of motzei shem rah that I had trouble approving it.  That is different than arguments about your hashkofa. If you want to continue attributing the disclaimer to other things I can only assume denial or cognative disonance.

     

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260359
    CS
    Participant

    Thanks for the clarification, appreciated. I hope you noticed in my post that I didn’t classify ALL Litvaks, I said some. And yes I do think it’s absurd to think that people tell us what we believe, based on a one liner from am entire part of Torah they’re not familiar with. We assure them they’re misunderstanding and explain or refer to where they can understand. Yet they’re still self assured that they know better our Chassidus/ Rebbe etc.

    Did you deliberately miss my point or did you not understand that I was referring to your extensive but false narrative in that post about what litvaks do, what they are taught and what they know about chassidus and lubavitch? Perhaps this is what you were taught to believe, perhaps it was your own misinterpretation, but the disclaimer was on your narrative.

    So since this is a new thread, if there are further questions you would like me to address, please repost.

    I think I left off with yankel Berel, I don’t remember the list of questions by heart, but the point was we differ on the first of them which renders the rest inapplicable. If you’d like you’re welcome to repost.

    Regarding the flip flop yb loves to post about Gimmel Tammuz and moshiach min hachaim etc. I’d like to point out that Chabad’s opponents equally flip flopped. Before Gimmel Tammuz, they assured us that we must be wrong, because not the Rebbe nor any other Torah leader was great enough to be considered a candidate for Moshiach and he therefore must come from the meisim.

    After Gimmel Tammuz they flip flopped and call thinking the Rebbe as Moshiach to be all kinds of extreme things. So I’m interested in hearing from you, as you’re very honest, why the flip flopping from the velt?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260281
    CS
    Participant

    I’m really not sure what happened on the other thread and to be frank , I’m enjoying the break of time and focus. If the mods see fit to reopen the other thread, and if you’re still interested in my contributions here, I’ll be happy to continue…

    I will try to clarify my part of your quandry – the other thread needed to be closed because of the incoming posts, not the conversation.  There is no reason to re-open it when this thread has already begun. The disclaimer about your post being condescending – it referred to your claims about litvaks, what they think, what they believe and what is seemingly missing from their yiddishkeit. None of which was supported by any posters.  Hope this sorts things out for you.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2260151
    CS
    Participant

    *Ode to the Mods*

    Just wanted to convey my absolute respect to the mods. I think they do a wonderful job moderating and carefully editing when people of any side cross a line. My experience this time around has thus been vastly enhanced to what I endured when I first came on several years ago. I am sorry the mod found my previous post condescending, this is just what is stated time and time again by more than one litvish poster, and only CTLawyer and keith said anything back. They are both not born and bred litvish.

    That said, as the mods felt that some line had been crossed and felt compelled to close the other thread, I don’t want to continue it and risk it being closed again at some odd point. Additionally, I am behind my weekly study regimen, for other reasons as well, and I’d like to catch up. So thanks for allowing this discussion- personally I’ve sharpened my understanding of the condition of “Melech” in the Rambam under discussion. I’ve also received a wonderful treasure trove of the research done into the Rebbes yichus. Hopefully others have gained something as well. Gutte voch from my locality.

    in reply to: BY girl struggling #2259990
    CS
    Participant

    Maybe you can ask those in the school you feel comfortable with to do what we had in high school: The school arranged an after school farbrengen (program/ whatever you want to call it), with a qualified person who can address the struggle (we had someone who had been struggling in this area and had gone modern and then woke up at her engagement when she saw her chosson to be hanging out with her friends who had come to say Mazal Tov. She made a u turn and took a new path fire herself after that), either someone who can personally relate or who doesn’t feel threatened by open honest questions and can address them. The event would be after school and optional, for whoever feels they would benefit from attending.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2259986
    CS
    Participant

    Here’s what I understand why these conversations go nowhere:

    Litvish and lubavitch grow up with completely different mindsets. It seems many litvish grow up thinking lubavitch is very off hashkafically, but not enough to assur them outright, so you can eat at our Chabad houses, daven at our shuls, use the many things we offer, but you still hold your noses at us. At least some. You also tend to think we don’t know how to learn and are overall ignorant of nigle.

    Meanwhile lubavitch grow up as Hashem being very real in our lives as a result of the tangible things we see and Laem through the Rebbe. Besides for the many miracles which we all have, it’s really the personal experience of how Chassidus infuses life and chayus into our lives that says it all. We are raised to be soldiers of the Rebbe and obviously Hashem, because it is an army that is needed to do the difficult work to bring Moshiach. The Rebbe exuded this kind of bitul to his Rebbe, so it comes natural, besides for the sense that The Rebbe is just completely above our league, so questioning the Rebbes instructions is the same as a goat doing so on the basis of his understanding. (This goat comparison comes from the time of the Alter/ Mitteler Rebbe by one of his tremendous Chassidim who was a tzadik himself. We do learn nigle in our Yeshivos for the majority of the day, and we also learn Chassidus.

    So when the two meet, the litvish person thinks the Chabad guy is completely ignorant of real learning, and is surprised when he is bested in Gemara by the Lubavitcher (happened countless times in Yeshiva with my brothers. And they’re not the top either.) They’re also self assured that the Lubavitchers hashkofa is completely off.

    Meanwhile the Lubavitcher assumes that the litvak just don’t understand the background of the one liners they’re throwing out, and obviously misinterpreting it, and try to explain. However these conversations don’t go well, because the litvak is anyway convinced the Lubavitcher is off, and doesn’t want to touch their hashkofa.

    The irony of it all is that it’s actually the other way around. The litvaks are the ignorant ones- they’re trying to tell us what Chassidus is, or how wrong it is, when they’ve never studied it. They accuse us of putting down others, when we never speak of litvaks as treif in any way. Or anyone else. We are very proud of our Rebbe, and expect the others to feel the same about theirs.

    I once saw a picture of satmar Chassidim welcoming their Rebbe with a banner proclaiming him Moshiach in the early 1900s.

    This is why the two never meet. If a litvak were sincere in trying to learn any sicha, and coming from that perspective, then we’d have some real dialogue. Otherwise, obviously we’re not gonna take you guys seriously. You think you know Chassidus better than us when you’ve never studied it

    disclaimer: This was so difficult for me to post as it is so misinformed and condescending.  🤦‍♂️

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259600
    CS
    Participant

    Getting back to Arso regarding the yichus question. The rabbi I know who’s knowledgeable in this field sent me copies of several pages of a sefer written on this with copious references to other sources. It’s not on Hebrew books and I’m not going to write up and translate the entire thing. I can send you the book title and page numbers if you’re that interested in getting a physical copy.

    Or if there’sa way to upload them here, and you want them, lmk.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259471
    CS
    Participant

    Yb I’ll get back to you at my next opportunity iyH.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259467
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty

    “This explains how he cam gey Aliyahs everyonday amd Thursday.”

    Yes that’s the root of it, but that behavior has no sanction by Rabbonim or sources in the Rebbes sichos.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259462
    CS
    Participant

    Arso:

    “CS: “So we don’t need a new Rebbe to tell us what is needed today- we know exactly what to do”

    Does that include breaking the wall of 770? It seems some know that that is exactly what to do, while others know that that is exactly NOT what to do.”

    Everyone has free choice. Those who are sincere, speak to their Rabbanim and mashpiim and learn as much as they can, have plenty to do and know exactly what to do…

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259460
    CS
    Participant

    Arso:

    “CS: “which was very real in their reality although it wasn’t true”

    I can’t believe a G-d-fearing Yid could write a statement like that in regards to anything at all! It is probably the wokest statement that I have seen in YWN.

    Real in their reality but not true?! If it’s real, it’s true. If it’s not true it’s not real.”

    Look I’m sorry you never came across this. There’s two realities: Hashem is the Only Existence period. 2) I’m here.

    Hashem created this world with these two senses of reality, and our avoda is to realize and internalize that the truth is 1, and make that true in 2.

    Now these two realities can seem conflicting sometimes. The Yidden really saw a funeral. Moshe was still very much alive.

    Yakov was embalmed and buried. He was alive and opened his eyes and smiled when Esavs head was knocked off.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259456
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “That is until Lubavich, in their great humility, decided to use it for themselves.”

    Is calling ourselves the chosen nation arrogant? No because it’s much more of a responsibility and liability. Taking the title of Nassi means taking responsibility to be there for every Jew in any way needed. If you feel your Rebbe behaves in this way, feel free to call him nassi too. I really don’t care.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259453
    CS
    Participant

    DaMoshe:

    “CS: I’d use your medical analogy, but turn it against you. If a 3 year old would read a medical text cover to cover, would you trust what the kid says regarding medicine? No, because they can’t hope to understand it.
    Learning chassidus/kabalah as the primary type of Torah is like a 3 year old reading a medical text. You can’t hope to understand it, because the foundations are in Chumash, Mishnayos, and Gemara. You may think you’re an expert, but you’re not, because you’re missing the foundations. You just twist the words to suit your goals – just like the story I wrote earlier, painting the targets around the arrows.”

    Chassidus is not the same as kabbala, it’s basically the essence of Torah which can bring together all the other parts and apply it to human understanding. (You’re welcome to learn kutres inyana shel Toras HaChassidus for more info and sources.) Because it always ties down to the practical, it’s not dangerous. I think what is dangerous is litvishe people coming with their understanding of Hashem’s Unity, hashgocha protis, Rebbe, Neshama, yid etc, and then seeing a one liner here or there- they’re the ones who seem to have difficulty understanding Chassidus. It’s not that they’re less smart. Is that they may have less education on these topics, as the essence of them is not discussed well in nigle, and they just throw these things around like a joke. Like the Atzmus sicha.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259451
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “You can’t – I really feel like swearing here! – quote Rashi and then say, “Ignore the part that says 45 years because that doesn’t work for me.”

    Can you find any example of others on this thread who have done anything like that? I don’t think so. Men who are bnei Torah – even not the greatest of talmidei chachomim – NEVER argue that way because we know it is nonsensical. If you’re going to have a discussion with men, you can’t argue that way either!”

    Ok please explain how Rashi could have brought the number 45+ when his sources in the Medrash gives a different number?

    Secondly, why is it a problem to say geula can always come quicker? If it has to conform to a number, why are you a kofer if you don’t expect Moshiach every day? Especially if the number is exactly 45+?

    Thirdly, if even a NEVUAH that is negative can be completely abolished, why is it crazy to say that Moshiach can come way sooner than the number a mefaresh says?

    Fourthly, if even the various sources on the topic disagree on the length, and various sources say it is a TEST, why can’t I conclude that the main idea is there, the difference is in the details of time- which implies that we don’t know the exact time, because as stated, it’sa TEST?

    Fifthly I’d be delighted to stop answering to this and let a male take over. Looking for proper candidates who will explain things clearly without avoiding what the Rebbe said and did.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259450
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “Simply, it doesn’t make sense. If the LR was himself Mashiach why refer to his father-in-law as Mashiach? And why “get answers” from his father-in-law’s grave? Wasn’t he good enough to be Mashiach on his own, or has Mashiach in your mind become a Siamese-twin concept? (Please don’t tell me that since the Rambam doesn’t say anything against it, that might indeed be the case ☹.)”

    The Rebbe was completely batul to his father in law, and only finally agreed to take on the nesius when his wife, (FR’s daughter) told him that if he doesn’t do so, all her fathers work will go to waste. The Rebbe was Malchus which is the sefira that doesn’t have anything of its own but crowns the next level. The Rebbe campaigned for every chossid to have a mashpia and this was the Rebbes mashpia. Etc. in Lubavitch we have no problem being batul to the Rebbe, seeing how great he was and yet so incredibly batul to the Frierdiker Rebbe. In any case the Moshiach of the generation The Rebbe always considered his father in law. In the last two years of The Rebbes nesius, we saw some indications that this had switched to the Rebbe as the head of dor shvii.

    “In lubavitch, a Rebbe is not an inspirational yid.”

    Your naivete is showing once again! I have never heard a chossid of any Rebbe referring to his Rebbe as simply being an ‘inspirational Yid’. When will you learn that all the garbage taught to you in your Chassidic hashkafa classes – call them what you will – was designed to have you believe (wrongly, of course) that Lubavich is on an unbelievably higher level than Menagdim, Pailisher chassidim etc? It is all a crutch for you to lean on when you come face to face with people whose hashkofos are really Torah-true, and to prevent you realising that yours are false, misleading and dangerous.”

    No I actually got this education from outside of lubavitch starting from when I was in eighth grade and a Rebbes granddaughter was boasting about her zeidas car and it didn’t compute in my head that that would be something of importance to a Rebbe until she explained to me that their Rebbes aren’t the same anymore due to yeridas hadoros. Btw even the mashpiim etc of lubavitch, who understand as much about the Rebbe as a goat does, to quote R Hillel Paritcher, who was actually a tzaddik (not that todays are), could care less about physical status symbols.

    It then continued with the exposure to other groups and their lack of understanding of our natural bitul
    to the Rebbe, which makes sense in this light.

    Finally, your question about just replacing the Rebbe and a certain candidate you and others have referred to, just all confirm the same thing. My idea of a Rebbe and yours are completely different. Apples and oranges.

    “He said, “They should not be singing a niggun of a group who consider only themselves as having the true path.”

    We don’t consider ourselves as having the only true path, but we chose it because we think it’s the best path (as I hope others feel they found the best for them) and we feel incredibly lucky to be the Rebbes chassidim.

    “but there are references to it being the dor hashvii”

    What are the sources of those references?”

    Fair question. This is really inside info though only meant for those individuals who are already living with a geula mindset and seriously interested to know for the right reasons. I can tell you that if you learn the sichos of 5751 and 5752, especially with a Lubavitcher, and pay attention to the footnotes, there’s a ton of info in them, including what you’re asking. I know you won’t be doing that, but that’s my part in answering.

    “And while I’m on a quest for sources, can you please provide a source for your claim that when the Ramban said we rejected yoshke because yoshke had died, he did not really mean it, and he only said it because that was all he could say?”

    I’ve asked someone, in the meantime, you and YB should please answer how the Ramban could contradict the gemara (think it’s sanhedrin 98) which says that Moshiach can come from the dead or the living, and Rashi brings two examples of individuals thus suited from both. We all know the Gemara predated the Ramban.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259446
    CS
    Participant

    Ca

    That’s a different discussion. We all know what we saw happened on Gimmel Tammuz, we can all see the clues in the sichos and the Rebbes actions in hindsight. And yet, there are references that make it clear to us that there’s a lot more here than meets our eye. We have various sources that bridge the gap such as the Rabbeinu Bachya mentioned, but ultimately no one will know until this period is over.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259442
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty

    “He may have been your leader but he certainly wasn’t the leader of Klal Yisrael.”

    How about you may not consider him your leader but myriads of Jews from all walks of life were touched by the Rebbe, and many many from all backgrounds came to him for personal interaction and guidance Yechidus and dollars.

    “ As for me being arrogant for calling myself doctor. That’s the title I earned and was given to me by the state of NY. Should I tell my patients to call me qwerty?”

    Sorry I didn’t remember your stated profession. It was meant to be an innocent example.

    “ You keep returning to my supposed slander. We both agree that the Rebbe called himself god clothed on human form. You choose to believe that thos is correct. I choose to believe, as do all rational Jews, that this is Kefirah.”

    It is evident from the way you post about it that your understanding of it is kefira. That’s unfortunate but when I was a high school girl and learned it in the sicha it’s in by “chance”, I didn’t understand it the way you do, and no Lubavitcher would.

    in reply to: BY girl struggling #2259437
    CS
    Participant

    I heard a farbrengen given to girls your age. I can’t sum the whole thing here because no one likes king posts and it takes much time to write up.

    Main points: our natural instincts are good and wonderful, and need to be guided to the appropriate place. Let’s say a girl is going to fast for her first time: she might start panicking, feeling she won’t survive the fast. Instead of ignoring and fighting her feelings, she can realize that yes, if she doesn’t eat for three days, she could die, but the fast is not 3 days so she’ll be ok. Working with your feelings instead of fighting them. And putting them in perspective.

    In this case, it’sa wonderful attraction Hashem created to the other gender. It helps us marry and build loving stable homes. But there’sa time and place for it. And it needs to be the right person too.

    Any of our natural instincts are powerful and therefore can be hard to fight. Hashem gave them to us as a gift and we need to use the brains Hashem gave us to make sure the gift is being used the way it’s meant to be, because otherwise it can be destructive.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259187
    CS
    Participant

    Arso, I guess I wasn’t clear. The sources are all in the sicha shoftim 5751. What I meant was not physical advice, but rather someone using Nevuah to tell someone else something regarding physical matters which they wouldn’t have known otherwise. Like Shaul and the donkeys, and obviously more weighty things as well.

    The other thing, I think many other Tzaddikim and Rebbeim pre the world war did this, it was quite common then. I’ve heard the same about the Baba Sali. This is not something unique to lubavitch, although after the war it was alot more rare it seems, for someone to have directed others in this area with certainty, not just as a brocha or wish which is also beautiful but not on the table

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259176
    CS
    Participant

    YB:
    I understand why the Chassidim of then were buttressing their position. It did seem impossible for things to end up this way, much as it must have seemed impossible for Moshe to delay coming (which was very real in their reality although it wasn’t true.) I’m not here to answer for every Lubavitcher as an individual. We are not collectively holding by beinoni/ tzadik, at least the communities I’ve seen. I’m here to answer questions and open to seeing sources inside.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259174
    CS
    Participant

    To qwerty
    I’m sorry you didn’t understand my previous post. The point is they were one Neshama split between two bodies, so both are correct. Although very later on, the Rebbe hinted it would be Moshiach as nassi of the seventh generation- so that would mean his body.

    Qwerty,
    I’m sorry you’re not understanding the subject. I did explain it as simple and short as I could. Maybe the online forum style isn’t the way you learn? Regardless it doesn’t give you the right to slander a tzadik based on your lack of knowledge on the subject. If someone would open a medical book, not take the time to read it properly, and then say the head surgeon doesn’t know what he’s doing, what does that say?

    Qwerty,
    The Rebbe didn’t make up the term Nassi, it’s found in rashi, and other sefarim. The other Rebbeim used it too , as far as I know. In any case it’sa description of a position. No more arrogant than you going by the title of your profession.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259175
    CS
    Participant

    Yb, I didn’t answer abc 123, because I challenged what you wrote in a, and explained it. So the following ones are irrelevant/ change once that’s there. Again if you find a source in Toras Menachem or sefer HaSichos, please post. Otherwise I can’t comment as there’s no evidence

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259171
    CS
    Participant

    CA
    you’re right, I should’ve clarified. By yetzias mitzrayim, there was only disappearance. My point was that you can’t always take what looks and seems like fact for granted, because before the eigel, Moshe looked like he was being buried by the Malachim in shomayim.

    Also there’s the Rabbeinu Bachya on parshas Vayechi, where he says that a true tzadik like Yakov and Rabbeinu Hakadosh, has two physical bodies, a guf gass, and guf dak. The guf gass is buried but the guf dak lives on, and that’s how Rabbeinu hakadosh kept coming home and making kiddush after his passing (must have been physical body or wouldn’t have been motzi the others). The Rebbe referenced this in relation to the Frierdiker Rebbe

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2259173
    CS
    Participant

    Arso and YB, I cannot reply to that which happened before my time and I’m unaware of. If you find a sicha printed, (they’re all the same) where the Rebbe said no one at all will be hurt or killed, there’s something to talk about. And yes, it makes sense that the Chassidim were excited about the Rebbes prediction and applied it in ways that the Rebbe himself had not said (although within the same spirit.)

    Regarding the Ramban, like I said it’s a plugsa bemetzius. What I remember is either true or isn’t. If someone knows and can reference, that would be helpful.

    Regardless, I posted other sources to back up what I said about the stages.

    Arso, the point is they all say the concealment period is different times. It’s not Halacha, and obviously the geula will not be delayed when we merit it because we have to fit exactly 45 years + the bit he mentions.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258937
    CS
    Participant

    Btw, to YB:

    Knowing history, I’m not surprised The Rambams didn’t use the most obvious argument- that yoshke was never Moshiach material, (as Rabbi Immanuel Schochet A”H did in his debates), even though that should be fairly obvious to us all, I hope, because it probably would have cost him his head.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258934
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty
    “Rabbi Butman, on jis radio program, regularly says that when Moshiach comes there won’t be any more Shnayim Ochzin Bitalis. Rather we’ll only have the Kabbalistic meaning of the Gemara. Thos attitude explains why Lubavichers don’t care what Rambam or the Gemara says. They think we’re in a new era where Kabbalah reigns.”

    I’m not familiar with his shiurim, but he was probably referring to what it says in Tanya, that because forgetfulness comes from klipa, we won’t need to learn Halacha more than once as we won’t forget it. Also, the Tanya continues, it could be that by learning the mysticism behind the Halacha, we will anyways know the Halacha. Therefore, our time will be spent on the secrets of the Torah, but this is not because we won’t keep Halacha, au contraire as above.

    In fact, the Rebbe always sent people to Rabbanim, and stressed that any changes in observance of Halacha can only happen through Rabbanim.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258931
    CS
    Participant

    Arso, I agree with you that the ultimate vision is not to take care of just not frum. The ideal vision that The Rebbe left us with is that every yid is a shliach. Whatever their talents are, whether in shlichus, teaching, business etc. they do that job with a sense of shlichus, always looking out to help other yidden come closer to Hashem, as well as themselves, and prepare the world for Moshiach.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258930
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “Hold on a second. The Lubavicher rebbe claiimed his father-in-law was Mashiach? So was he wrong or right? If he was wrong, then you admit that he could be wrong, and thus possibly wrong in other statements. If he was right, then his father-in-law was Mashiach – and btw he hasn’t been alive for over 70 years and has still not returned! – so your rebbe was not Mashiach.”

    The Rebbe was completely batul to his father in law, and even took the panim he received to the Frierdiker Rebbes ohel, where he would come back with the answers. When the Rashag was once pressed as to why he dropped his bid to become Rebbe, and became a chossid of his brother in law, he said that since the Frierdiker Rebbes histalkus, he hasn’t heard from him, whereas his brother in law, The Rebbe claimed to be in touch. One thing I know, he said, I’d that my brother in law is not a lier. So I became his chossid.

    Basically they’re one essence, even more than the other Rebbeim, as this kept up the entire nesius. So either way is fine, but there are references to it being the dor hashvii etc.

    “Having had tons of experience with Lubavich obfuscating (another word which I never get to use, so please mods don’t delete that word!) I am guessing that you will answer something along the lines that they are really the same person and the neshama has moved from one to the other, being “nesi’im” of Chabad. So if that’s the case, simply appoint another live “nasi” and he wil be a live Mashiach, removing so many of the problems.”

    2 answers:
    1. In lubavitch, a Rebbe is not an inspirational
    yid. We have Mashpiim and Rabbonim. He is an extension of Moshe Rabbeinu, who stood
    between the yidden and Hashem, whose every word is Hashem’s word. (A Rebbe doesn’t know everything, but whatever he says in response to a chossid is from Hashem. Like the time The Rebbe advised someone to miss their place with later crashed- when asked why he didn’t say the reason so more people could have been saved- he said he didn’t know the reason. He just knew that the person shouldn’t get on.) this applies in Avodas Hashem- what is this persons personal shlichus in this world, generational shlichus etc. And also to help people connect to Hashem and help them receive Hashem’s brachos, which may have been impeded by certain things with the Rebbe tells the person to take care of (being more careful with a certain Mitzvah etc.)

    If you need a tailor, even if there’s an abundance of plumbers, it’s not gonna help you. Same here, there is simply no one else of Rebbe material in Lubavitch, and if you’rea good mashpia or Rav, that’s wonderful, but you’re nota a Rebbe.

    Answer 2: The Rebbe told us all that were the next Rebbe- meaning he turned over the mission he devoted his life to, to us. So we don’t need a new Rebbe to tell us what is needed today- we know exactly what to do and have the tools to do it. By the Rebbes kevura, the shluchim promised not to stop their shlichus, and to carry on until we succeed in bringing Moshiach, which is what we were tasked with. So it’s irrelevant.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258928
    CS
    Participant

    Qwerty,

    “I asked CS to give an example of my having spread Loshon hora. She answered that I accepted the lie that the Rebbe is god. The problem is that the Lubavichers in a different thread said that the Rebbe announced in 1962 that he’s god clothed in human form. So I’ve spoken Lishon hora by repeating what the Rebbe said about himself.”

    No, the way you presented it, due to your lack of understanding, indicated that The Rebbe is god Himself- like god who took his whole self and became a person. That’s NOT what The Rebbe said, whether the words sound similar or not, and anyone with a basic background of Chassidus would know.

    The Rebbe meant the exact opposite, that the potential of every Jew, which the Rebbe is the head so able to actualize it, is to completely negate his sense of separate selfhood, and tap into his true identity of his Neshama which is one with Hashems Atzmus (not that he limits Hashem to being enclothed in one body cvs- rather- you look at him and see Atzmus- that he’sa G-dly person.)

    Hope that clarifies.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258925
    CS
    Participant

    DaMoshe,

    “CS, it was reported by a Yaakov Zisholtz. I have no idea who he is. If I Google him, I don’t find much. So no, I wouldn’t trust it.”

    Ok that’s fair

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258924
    CS
    Participant

    Ca,

    “Cs,

    Disappearance doesn’t mean die (moshe rabbeinu didn’t die when he “disappeared”

    I guess you missed the heavenly funeral bit. For starters

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258916
    CS
    Participant

    Regarding the question about the gulf war from yb, that’s a legitimate question. I’ve asked about it, and here’s what the rabbis reply was:

    Regarding the gulf war:
    The Rebbe said that we will see miracles and that Yidden are safe in EY

    Chassidim decided that it must mean that there will be no missiles etc. They publicised that and it caused a chillul (as it is not what he said)

    https://www.chabad dot org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/62184/jewish/1991-Missiles-Miracles.htm

    https://derher dot org/wp-content/uploads/103-adar-5781-7.pdf

    Ps. Arso I haven’t finished with the yichus piece- looking into it thoroughly.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258920
    CS
    Participant

    DaMoshe:
    “CS, it was reported by a Yaakov Zisholtz. I have no idea who he is. If I Google him, I don’t find much. So no, I wouldn’t trust it.
    If you take one prediction the Rebbe made that came true, and use that as a sign that he was a Navi… there are plenty of people who made predictions that came true, including Shabsai Tzvi.
    When my wife and I were going through fertility treatments, we were having a lot of difficulty, and our doctor told us to give up. We got a bracha from a Rav that our next IVF should work, and B”H it did. Does that mean he was a Navi?
    There were sports players who predicted that they’d win a game, and they did. Maybe they’re nevi’im too?”

    Firstly this was a major prediction that no one else made and came with a lot of achrayus. Secondly, in the sicha, The Rebbe referenced the Alter Rebbe as saying that Chassidim should only ask for spiritual guidance, because guidance for physical matters belongs to neviim as Shaul asked the Navi Shmuel about his lost donkeys… yet we see that all Rebbeim, including the Alter Rebbe, did dispense advice about physical matters, which indicates they were neviim.

    Also, anyone can give a brocha and hope for the best, but at least in one instance, someone asked his Rebbe for not a bracha, but a havtacha, to which his Rebbe said that if he wants a havtacha, there’s only one place in the world- Lubavitch. The man did go to The Lubavitcher Rebbe, and did end up getting a havtacha. There are countless stories where The Rebbe told people not to have life saving surgeries, and similar situations, which turned out fine. Jem put out 2 books of such stories so far, with the individuals names and pictures, that they culled from their videoed interviews. There’s also much more online with jem media.

    in reply to: A Chasidus without a present Rebbe #2258915
    CS
    Participant

    Wow alot here:

    YB: Regarding the Ramban, I have heard that it’s won somewhere, (this is either a fact or not, I’ll look into if others don’t know) the mode of refutation in those says, when the whole thing was dangerous to begin with, was not done in a completely truthful way The way we see things, but on their terms. So even if it may say something different in Torah shebaal peh, they would still argue it because the notzrim only cared about Torah shebichsav.

    Regarding the sources for the stages of revelation, concealment, final revelation, here you go (was on page 3):

    משיח נגלה ונכסה וחוזר ונגלה
    אשרי המחכה וגו’. ארבעים וחמש שנים נוספים על חשבון העליון שעתיד משיחנו להתכסות אחר שנגלה וישוב ויתגלה. וכן מצינו במדרש רות, וכן יסד רבי אליעזר הקליר )בסילוקיוצרפרשתהחדש(ויתכסהמהם ְשבּוִעיםששה.
    (רש”י דניאל יב, יב)

    משיח יתכסה כגואל הראשון
    ויהיה הגואל נגלה וחוזר ונכסה כדי להתעות את העכו”ם ולהקשות את לבם, שכן מצינו בגאולת מצרים שנגלה להם משה וחזר ונכסה מהם, וזהו שדרשו רבותינו ז”ל: ויפגעו את משה ואת אהרן, אחר ששה חדשים נגלה הקב”ה במדין וא”ל: לך שוב מצרימה, בא משה ממדין ואהרן ממצרים ופגעו בהם שוטרי ישראל כשהם יוצאים מלפני פרעה. וכן דרשו במדרש חזית: דומה דודי לצבי, מה צבי זה הוא נראה ונכסה וחוזר ונראה, כן גואל הראשון נראה להם וחזר ונכסה מהם וחזר ונראה להם. וכמה נכסה מהם, רבי תנחומא אומר שלשה חדשים, הדא הוא דכתיב ויפגעו את משה ואת אהרן. רבי יהודה ב”ר אומר ללריסין, כלומר לשון פגיעה לפרקין היא. וכן הגואל העתיד יהיה נגלה וחוזר ונכסה, שהרי גאולה זו עתידה
    (רבינו בחיי פר’ ויחי עמ’ מד)

    להיות כדמיון גאולת מצרים בהרבה ענינים.
    נסיון גדול
    וזה נסיון גדול שנעלם הגואל ששה חדשים, וכן יהי’ בימי משיח צדקינו, יהי’ נעלם אחר התגלות כדאיתא במדרש וה’ יעמוד לימין הצדיקים בבי”א.
    (תורת משה פר’ שמות)

Viewing 50 posts - 251 through 300 (of 1,901 total)