CS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 1,901 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265553
    CS
    Participant

    Yb

    “ The people who undertook this concerted effort to push such delusional statements on to the public , are the ones who opened themselves up to the public square , and should be prepared to undergo a fact based ,open and honest evaluation by the very public on whom these assessments are being pushed .”

    Couldn’t resist this one. If you’re referring to this forum, the pattern has always been, people asking a Lubavitcher on a random thread about a completely different topic, “do you believe the Rebbe is Moshiach? How do you explain the Atzmus sicha?

    Then the Lubavitcher don’t understand why we’re switching topics and why you’re asking a question you don’t necessarily want the full answer to. I just say, np I’ll give you an answer.

    Then we get called out like we’re pushing something on people. This is the pattern pretty much every time.

    Remind me of the guy in London who a Muslim (just) told on a subway that his religion kills Muslims. The guy basically answered you don’t know what kind of person I am. The Muslim referenced the guys yarmulke, and the Jew for all upset and left the train.

    If it were me, I’d ask the guy if he actually wants an answer or if he’s just an anti semite. It could end with me giving him a sheva mitzvos card, and explaining that in our religion, everyone can go to heaven, and there’sa special track for non Jews, who are meant to be non Jews (United they really want to convert.)

    I think the mode of the day is to stop looking silly and emanated of who you are, and stand by what you wear and believe.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265537
    CS
    Participant

    Yb,


    When will the habad apologists understand and agree that criticism does not necessarily equal hate ?
    Don’t they realize that usage of the hate excuse , only showcases the weakness of their arguments ?”

    I think when the term hater is used, is when The person isn’t actually interested in an answer, and any answer you give will not be satisfactory. And even if it is, he just ignores it and brings up something else because it’s not really about the topic, it’s about his personal animosity to lubavitch.

    To the best of my knowledge, you do not fit this description, but I could see why Menachem used the term for others.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265536
    CS
    Participant

    Avira,

    “ It doesn’t mean that if you yourself decided that something chazal forbid or at the very least, you’ll agree, discourage, should be a mitzvah, that Hashem will protect you from the damage that can come from it that is included in chazals own statements. Lubavitchers don’t get a special shmira more than anyone else.”

    Again, this wasn’t something decided by women today. Rabbanim encouraged women to have a greater Torah education. My Rebbe wanted women to learn/ have access to all learning, generally, because of the different world states today(same reason as other Rabbonim.) This has nothing to do with feminism. I’m not interested in wearing Tallis and tefillin (in any case I get the Mitzvah by my other half fulfilling them.) it’s about what Hashem wants of me today (not 2000 years ago.) the Alter Rebbe writes that the Torah of the generation is revealed through the Rabbonim of the time. Obviously the mitzvos never change. But this isn’ta Mitzvah and Halacha does change by the situation.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265535
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “ To say that times have changed and women need it now implies that when Chazal said that it was not proper they did not take into account today’s women. Perhaps when they came up with the issur of, say, muktzeh, they also weren’t taking into account today’s generation.”

    A. Was never a blanket rule (The mekubalim as a whole encouraged women’s education including gemara.)

    B. Torah adapts to every situation, Halacha changes accordingly, Rabbanim decided overwhelmingly in favor of women’s Torah education today.

    Lastly, the Rambam writes that everyone will be busy with knowledge of Hashem when Moshiach comes (pretty sure this includes goyim., and obviously women.) obviously your comment doesn’t relate to any of this.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265534
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “ In other words, he eventually decided to invent the concept of dor shevi’i so that it would fit himself… which is exactly what I said.”

    Not sure what you’re on about. This is basic math. The Alter Rebbe was Chabad Rebbe 1, so obviously the Rebbe is 7. What’s invented?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265533
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “ That is so similar to my chassidus. Many of us eat on Yom Kippur so that those baalei teshuva who have not gone the whole way, and the Ffb who has chilled, are equally as part of the community as the most Chassidish. If we would enforce fasting on Yom Kippur it would turn people away, and that is the worst thing possible!”

    I don’t know where you get this from. We’re all into holding the highest standards personally, but not enforcing communal repercussions that will result in leaving out many people who could otherwise be on the way up (or their children etc.) This is not the same as what you wrote here. I hope you understand that. Every chossid is meant to uphold the highest standards himself and keep growing along with embracing other Jews. You see this model more famously by the shluchim. They do not eat treif to attract people and they do not take down mechitzas as unpopular as it may be. Au contraire, people are attracted to the shluchim because of their combination of authenticity and loyalty to Yiddishkeit (not personal comfort) while being open and non judgmental to others.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265532
    CS
    Participant

    HaLeivi,

    Thank you. I find it ironic that Arsos seemingly biggest gripe with lubavitch is that we think the Rebbe was a bigger tzadik than others, while he himself regularly demonstrates the Rebbe shockingly, in a way that should really call out a machaa on a general basis, and ironically how we would never speak any his Rebbe whoever it is.
    It’s nice to see another voice on this.

    Arso,

    “ Delete those contacts because they are liars!”

    Just for your info these are family friends in a well known chassidishe community (not lubavitch) who are non lubavitch Chassidim.

    “ There is an implication there that is truly shocking! Tznius for women is NOT an “external factor”. It is quite possibly the number one mitzvah that women have, as with a lack of tznius women is machshil literally hundreds of men every day. And that is not even dealing with the ramification that “if Mrs So-and-so can dress this way, cerainly I can.”

    I’m sorry you misunderstood. What I meant was that a Tznius lubavitch woman can be counted on to be a yarei shomayim through and through, because it is her choice to dress this way- and it can’t be compared to the many more strictly tznius women in other communities who are in many cases dressing because of social/communal pressure. Yes of course she gets the zechus of Tznius regardless, but it doesn’t mean she or her family is equally tznius behind closed doors.

    Tznius is very important and the crown midda of women (not just externally but moreover internally.) we had a tznius class in high school, I have run a tznius club myself, have written 3 curricula for different settings on it, and ironically, I hear that those of us who did learn about it, have more appreciation for tznius than those who may dress the dress but have a negative feeling about it because of the community experience.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265509
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “ I disagree. The above is not the case for women. Women can reach true ahavah and yir’ah without learning, by fulfilling their mitzvos and trying to be כל כבודה בת מלך פנימה. Men have to learn, but it is the Torah that affects them, not davka learning about Hashem.”

    I was going to list all my personal experiences but I’m not interested in speaking negative. Suffice to say I don’t find that to be the case. Only in lubavitch have I found the women have a passion for their Chassidus, and constantly farbreng on every medium they communicate with in hope to improve Avodas Hashem, or apply it to their lives, with a fire. It’s not hard to see the connection to how we are educated, and how we learn.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265511
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “ As to the ‘psak’ against giving back land, do you seriously not realize that not everything that happened in farbrengens became a sicha?! It wasn’t a published sicha; it was what happened at a farbrengen. Ask people who should remember (I certainly do) and they’ll tell you all about it.”

    I do know and see myself, how The Rebbe always spoke positive, and wished positive things to happen. Every sicha The Rebbe spoke in the later years about how it was the perfect date and parsha etc for the geula. Those were more Tefilla style, which usually started with vihi ratzon…

    And then there were the statements of facts.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265508
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “ What you don’t realise is that for many of us, what constitutes “kol minei nevoloh” is far different to what you consider it. I’ll give you two examples. Amongst other chassidim, chassanim meeting their kallos after the engagement is non-existent or at the very least kept to a VERY bare minimum. In Lubavich it is unfortunately common practice. In Lubavich bochurim eating at the same table as non-related girls is acceptable. Not in other chatzeiros.”

    This is a matter of minhagim. The minhag by us is to keep engagements very short (2-3 months) and to speak or
    meet about once a week- with specific consultation with a mashpia for exact numbers. We also encourage the chosson and kalla to stay in different cities until the wedding.

    Other Chassidim by contrast have about a year’s engagement so extra caution would be required.
    I have learned about separating boys and girls by meals, and we do this ourselves, although it seems for whatever reason, that it’s still common.

    In any case, it’s about caring to do what’s right, and following through, ie yiras shomayim. There are many groups within lubavitch (becoming frum, frum but not full standards, Lubavitch, chassidish, modern, going off) and the ones who care are definitely empowered to do what’s right and keep on growing from wherever they’re at.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265507
    CS
    Participant

    Arso:

    “What percentage of unmarried kids in, say, Satmar, Belz, Ger, Vizhnitz, Tsanz etc have access to unfiltered internet and to unfiltered smartphones? Now what is the percentage in Lubavich? I don’t know figures, but I do know that the percentage in Lubavich is many many times greater than in the other groups. The same is unfortunately true with kids – even kids of committed shluchim – going OTD. (If you deny any of this I will conclude one of two things: either you are lying outright or you are completely insane. I KNOW exactly what I am talking about, and I have been asked many times to deal with the problem specifically in Lubavich. I’m sure you’re surprised at that, but it’s true.)”

    A gutte voch from my locality. Like I said, you cannot compare numbers where one group- everything is legislated from above, and those who do not keep the standards, do what they do, under cover, so they don’t suffer communal repercussions, (yes I have personal knowledge of this as well), and a community (us) where the responsibility lies with the individual to care and guidelines are suggested but not enforced (so that every child can have a proper chinuch for example.)

    I was discussing this with a very frum local woman, not lubavitch, and she said lubavitch is ahead of the game, because in the rest of the chareidi world, the top down system is in danger because devices are so accessible.

    My relative- who dressed more modern than he looked was told by a family friend’s son, in probably one of the most enclosed Chassidusin, that he has a smartphone with WhatsApp groups with all the hot stuff with his young feelings…

    My relative was surprised because obviously the outside impression didn’t match, and ironically, he didn’t share this fascination with the “hot stuff” despite the fact he looked more modern.

    Take this as an illustrative example. No I am not suggesting that there are no true Yarei shomayim in the other communities, but rather you cannot judge because of the different cultures, and ultimately, they’re more vulnerable than we are.

    In my case, my husband and I experimented with the different limited filtering options available on our iPhones when we got married, and found the highest one too restrictive, so we settled for basic. This was not to prevent us for searching forthings we shouldn’t, because we had no interest in that. Rather we didn’t want to be surprised with vulgar sites that appeared to be something else. This is how it’s been for years, and we’ve learned more and more how to use our phones and move away from our phones using us (focus mode, 613tube, passion for learning etc etc), and now we’ve recently found a new interest in filters and bH to our luck, tag has told us that there is a new filter which is more smart at blocking out not tznius images or ads that pop up, while still allowing websites so we’re excited to try it out.

    I know in the local Mesivta they teach the boys about the concept of filters (although they probably allow smartphones then, as is general policy) and of setting up password buddies for each other.

    So it’s not that we don’t care, but it comes from within and you cannot compare to your world.

    The only fair comparison, I think, is when the Soviet Union took away the whole communal pressure system by exiting the Rav and Shochet etc to Siberia. What happened to Berdichov which was 80% frum Yidden? And Zhitomir, at least 50%? We all know that Lubavitch was the only one overall (I’ve heard of one non lubavitch teacher who taught in Chabad’s hidden chadarim), who not only didn’t go frei themselves but kept up Yiddishkeit and community life (Mikvah, shochet etc) underground with extreme mesirus nefesh.

    Yes there are the modern within Chabad, and the ones who go off. We have bechira chofshis. But our modern dress that way etc.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265187
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “ Only Lubavich has this chauvinistic attitued, and, as I have written in the past, I believe it’s a crutch because they know that the chareidi world has JUSTIFIED complaints against them. By being insular and only thinking about Luabavich, you find it easier to ignore those complaints rather than rectify them”

    I don’t know of others, but coming from lubavitch this definitely isn’t the sentiment. Lubavitch has been under attack from its very inception- the Alter Rebbe faced alot of scholarly opposition in Lita where he was sent, there was bitter hisnagdus which actually culminated (physically) in his arrest. There was peace in the time of the Tzemach Tzedek as everyone fought the Maskilim together. But yeah, sometimes in lubavitch we feel like “the Jews among the Jews” persecution wise. But we’re very proud of our Rebbeim and derech.

    There’s a difference btw between personal pride and pride in one’s derech. As Jews were eschew gaava, yet we have Geon Yakov. Same here, as individuals, we know we are equal to every Jew, which is why we care to offer every Jew the opportunities we have to do a Mitzvah, and/ or learn Chassidus.

    But we are extremely proud of our derech, and yes one of our songs is אשרינו י׳הודים אנו, ומה נעים חסידים אנו ומה יפה חסידי חב״ד של אדונינו מורינו ורבינו.

    I don’t see why people find this offensive. If I found another derech to bring me much closer to Hashem, I would seriously consider it. I should hope everyone else feels the same about their derech. And if not, maybe it’s something for them to think about. Not us.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265189
    CS
    Participant

    Yb,

    I don’t care about normative Judaism vs Chabad unless you can list sources. I gave Chabad’s reasoning for looking a candidate based on the Rambam being a practical Halacha sefer, and also showed you it’s not from just this generation.

    Alright, that’s it for my time for now. So long till next time
    iyH

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265188
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “ . As I have written a number of times, your rebbes are as much descendants of Beis Dovid as I, and possibly your won husband, are. No proof whatsoever. And, for your information, there are many gedolei Yisroel around today who are descendants of Beis Dovid, and although they may not be able to prove it 100% with witnesses, their claims have more base to it that Lubavich’s.”

    Just because you haven’t bothered looking into it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I actually got the pages of a book written with so much info and references I couldn’t read it through to the end. You’re welcome to look them all up yourself. Problem is the book isn’t online. The title is yechi HaMelech HaMoshiach- by Rabbi Wolpo. If you want the page numbers, lmk:)

    Btw thanks for reporting but I’m pretty sure the term Nassi wasn’t out of use for the last 1000 years. If you Google נשיא הדור חבדפדי׳ה you’ll get seforim listed, I don’t think they’re all that old.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265184
    CS
    Participant

    Yankel Berel:

    “ All Rebeim are descendants of Beis Dovid .
    But ONLY habad claims the title of Nasi .”

    News to me. I don’t think every Chassidic Rebbe descended from Malchus Beis dovid and you’re welcome to prove otherwise.

    “AND ONLY HABAD CLAIMS THE TITLE OF

    “Nasi HADOR”

    The whole generation .

    Without even asking the generation .
    I consider myself part of the generation . But no one asked me …

    2] Are you insinuating other rebeim do not feel responsibility for all Jews ?????
    Only the manhig of the habad hasidim does ?”

    Obviously every Mitzvah of every Jew affects Klal Yisrael. But yes, say Satmar is not looking to engage every Jew from all spectrums and bring them closer to Hashem. They focus on their own community. I do this too. I do my bit in my corner of the world and know that’s doing my part of the whole. Most leaders lead their community and that’s wonderful. In fact I think every group is like this, not unique to Satmar. Please show me another leader invested in caring for every Jew to help them with their issues and needs. This is something extra special and no I don’t see it anywhere else- you’re welcome to show me

    posted with apologies to Satmar

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265183
    CS
    Participant

    Wow I missed alot… just replying in order till the next time…

    Avira,

    “ CS, there are two halachik reasons why we don’t teach Torah to women, and neither have anything to do with their domestic responsibilities or chazals time and place.

    The first reason is that they make Torah into divrei havai.

    The second reason, in the yerushalmi, is that they’re easier to persuade than men to do an averah, and Torah makes one able to be tricky if they choose, so that’s a dangerous combination.

    My argument is according to the first reason. ”

    Firstly, this is mostly non applicable today, as noted, Torah Shebichsav is studied by virtually all from girls schools and endorsed by Rabbonim. Ok to varying degrees. Some allow more than others. Not sure why you’re picking on something mostly irrelevant Today.

    Secondly it was never a blanket rule or else Rashi would not have taught his daughters, Tge Or HaChaim HaKadosh wouldn’t have written his peirush (based on shiurim with his daughters) etc etc.

    The Alter Rebbes grandmother learned Gemara and taught her daughter to also. Apparently the people following the path of the mekubalim (which preceded Chassidus) allowed it, and the opponents of kabala didn’t. I’m sure you know this was way before Sara schenirer.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264296
    CS
    Participant

    Just one more thought before i never see responses, I find the attitude of concern of דברי הבאי, to be a curious one. I suppose within Chabad, the attitude towards anything good(including the topic here- women’s learning) is more on the lines of

    הבא לטהר מסעיין לו
    מתוך שלא לשמה בא לשמה (אא״כ שלא לשמה ממש בשביל איזו פני׳ה כו׳)
    הכל בחזקת כשרות

    Etc etc. Along with a strong emphasis for personal responsibility to check with a mashpia/ Rav when in doubt. And my part of keeping my head cleared of non Jewish ideology/ philosophy, so I don’t mistake it for Torah.

    Something interesting: I recently finished writing up bH a motivational Tznius farbrengen curriculum (80+pages bH), for a high school that commissioned it.

    I had assumed that the male principal of the school, who was interested in upgrading the tznius program, would look it over, and it included the hashkofos I’ve learned and imbibed and also, I wanted to make sure to get it right because many girls will iyH be learning it.

    However, it became clear that no one was planning on checking it, aside from the post sem leaders who were going to give it over.

    I was very careful to write based on sources, and in fact, the leaders asked me to list exact sources so they could present them or look them up at will.

    I was happy they asked and spent double the time annotating with sources- from Rashi, Rambam, Gemara, Mishna, Shulchan Aruch, Chassidus etc.

    I asked a scholarly cousin to look it over, and my husband as well, but they weren’t interested in taking the time (if my husband was concerned, he would have been on top of it.)

    There was one time I was going in a certain direction based on two contemporary speaker/ article, where my husband asked what I was looking up for, and then he shared something that helped me delete all that piece and start with a more positive approach. (Not women Maalos vs men, but rather only focus on the maalos of women.)

    I also called a Rav once to check my hashkofa against a certain source that carried a different message.

    And I know that the leaders will check with me if there’s anything they see that doesn’t seem right.

    But that’s it. There’s alot of empowerment and trust within lubavitch in individuals. (That’s aside from the special attention the women as a community received from the Rebbe such as sichos just for women etc which is a different topic.)

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264230
    CS
    Participant

    Avira
    “That also leads us to another question – if most women were incapable of gemara study in the times of chazal, when people were purer and holier, to the point where they would make it divrei havai…. today’s women are any better? We’ve only dropped in our madregos since then.”

    Context is everything- at least to me. Back in the day, women were not obligated to spend years in school, and everyone had enough work to do from the crack of dawn till late at night, many just to survive. For a woman to be taught back in the day, with her mind multi tasking to get her many responsibilities and lacking the concentration and interest needed, was not a good thing according to Rabbi Eliezer.

    Fortunately todays world is completely different for men and women alike (The average life span was about 50 not too long ago) and the leisure time and focus we have
    should be put to good use (in addition to the fact we go to school.) were fortunately tasting the times when “לא י׳הי׳ה עסק כל העולם כולו אלא לדעת את ה׳ בלבד”.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264229
    CS
    Participant

    AAQ,
    “ If a lady shows interest in learning more in depth of mitzvos – that is what gemora is in the wider meaning – this should surely enhance her ability to look after her family yiddishkeit.”

    Bingo. Not sure why this wasn’t obvious to all

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264228
    CS
    Participant

    “The Rayatz could have been Mashiach, but since he wasn’t we need dor shevi’i to be Mashiach, and that just happens to be the LR who is the one who revealed the need for dor shevi’i.”

    Bit more nuanced. Even after dor shvii commenced, The Rebbe held of the Frierdiker Rebbe as the real Rebbe, and the Rebbe as merely his spokesman (because others couldn’t hear directly from him since yud Shvat), and thus The Rebbe still referred to him as Moshiach of the generation for many years

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264173
    CS
    Participant

    Avira

    “The vast majority of ehrliche women throughout history were completely uneducated in seforim. According to you, did they all indulge in goyishe things? Chas veshalom! A girl who grows up knowing what their purpose is and who is taught the dangers of goyishe culture will not get involved in such things, whether they’re chasidishe or litvishe.”

    I think it’s easy to understand that we’re in a different world today which is why women need to learn to begin with. Back in the day, leisure ideas were completely different, treif wasn’t as accessible, and there was no Scop so girls received everything from home. I don’t need to repeat it all, I’m sure you can look up a bit of the history of Sara Schenirer.

    But another point, sometimes we over glorify the past. I’ve read excerpts based on the Ramchal where Talmidei chachamim are advised to maintain distance from their wives so they don’t get pulled down…. Yes a lack of Torah learning can easily lead to superficial values.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264194
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “Btw do you remember (obviously, you can’t, but you can ask) when the LR had a “vote” at a farbrengen resulting in a psak that land not be returned to the Arabs? The point was that since לא-ל גומר עלי, min Hashomayim that psak would be followed, and land would not be returned. What happened to that prediction, or is that also to be swept under the already bulging carpet. (Please don’t start replying how we see it was a mistake to return land. That is not the point I am making here at all.)”

    Unsurprisingly, I didn’t hear of it. There is many many sichos I have yet to learn. Would you know which sicha this is printed in? Or the date?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264195
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “We all know – it has been discussed and never denied – that the tznius and mixing of genders in Crown Heights is far worse than in any other chareidi enclave. We all know that the number of children allowed unfettered use of internet and smartphones is far greater in Crown Heights that in any other chareidi enclave. Women putting the stress on learning gemoro and chassidus instead of looking after their children’s Yiddishkeit, is worse than counterproductive!”

    Completely missing the point. Wanna reread or do I need to explain?

    “Now if you are part of the minority who doesn’t allow the above in your home, well done (!), and Hashem should help you continue in your efforts. But we are not having a personal debate about you versus us. It is about what goes on in Lubavich versus the proper chareidi world.”

    I think we’ve discussed this before. The other chareidim operate on chitzonius first basis. This is my info from my personal contacts. So if you have the perfect dress and keep the communal standards, your kids can go to the school.

    In lubavitch we don’t work that way. We accept all kids in the schools and other institutions. Therefore, you will see people who are more modern dress that way so their outside matched their inside more or less.

    Whereas in the other set up, if someone watches movies etc, they would likely still dress the same as everyone else.

    This doesn’t mean lubavitch has less yiras shomayim overall, it just means we’re more transparent about where we’re at. It also means that since everyone can be honest with no repercussions, it’s likely easier for those who are more modern to mix and open up to the more Chassidish, whereas if you have to worry about external factors, that may inhibit those struggling to open up and get help.

    It’s just a completely different community structure. Yes, you can enforce (with repercussions) the way someone dresses, but you cannot enforce yiras shomayim. Also, lubavitch embraces many different levels of Yiddishkeit and chassidishkeit, and we all mix with each other with an emphasis on ahavas Yisrael, so those baalei teshuva who have not gone the whole way, and the Ffb who has chilled, are equally as part of the community as the most Chassidish.

    Whereas, as one Satmar woman told my mother (a bt) that she was happy to teach her homemaking skills once she was already frum, but if she had showed up to her house not frum/ tznius (as she did by Chabad), she would have closed her shutters and not opened the door.

    So all in all, your comparisons are off.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264172
    CS
    Participant

    Avira

    ““Nesius” is a term created יש מאין. The last time there was a Nasi was in the early amoraim.”

    Incorrect. It’s in sefarim more recent than that. (Arso has looked into it- ask him).

    Yes lubavitch is unique in applying it to their Rebbeim. I guess as descendants of Beis Dovid, we are unique. And the term connotes responsibility for all Jews, not just your community.

    And yes we’re proud of it and it wouldn’t bother us if others had the same outlook- it would be great if every community looked out for the entire Klal Yisrael.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264174
    CS
    Participant

    Avira

    “But some girls simply don’t keep what they’re taught.”

    This is true.

    “And if you want to start getting into anecdotal incidents…. those with glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Have you seen what became accepted in crown heights in recent years? Are you aware of how many girls – and boys – who can rattle off sichos but are engaged in kol minei nivalah?”

    Coming from lubavitch, The ones who consistently are into learning and can rattle off the sichos in depth, are not generally the ones involved with that kind of stuff…

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264175
    CS
    Participant

    Avira,

    “A woman’s ruchnius isn’t from learning. It’s from tznius, chesed and davening. Learning Torah accomplishes everything for a man; it does very little for women. Perhaps it can be an element of avodad Hashem, but there’s a reason why it is not a chiyuv – and we know that גדול המצווה ועושה, one who does what he is obligated to do is bigger than one who does something they’re not obligated to do. It’s a basic chazal; the enthusiasm women might have over learning could be the same kind of yatzer hora that makes men more interested in chessed than learning – it’s a yatzer hora.”

    So I can agree with you that for me at least, learning Gemara is good as far as research, but doesn’t do as much for me in Avodas Hashem- I prefer practical Halacha.

    But, and here’s the big but, at least 2 of the שש מצות תמידיות are knowing, fearing and loving Hashem. You can’t fulfill these mitzvos adequately without learning about Hashem. Without learning you will not have these emotions. So anything related is more than relevant to women, in fact it’s a yesod for Avodas Hashem.

    And I’m lucky enough to have Chassidus which shines a light on all the other Torah I have learned. And that’s part of why (in addition to the Baal Shem Tovs mandate from Moshiach) we are so passionate to share with others. If we were so elitist, we’d keep it all to ourselves.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264190
    CS
    Participant

    Yb

    “1] for the last 2 thousand years yidden NEVER looked for ‘candidates’ . Full Stop.
    The few instances some looked and FELL for [bogus] candidates, it invariably resulted in DISASTER.
    This whole idea of ‘looking for candidates’ is UNHEARD OF in normative yahadut , and is a newfangled notion, introduced by habad in the last 60 years AS A TOOL for the tolerance / acceptance of “the one Asher habad hafets biyekaro”.
    This is CRYSTAL CLEAR to any unbiased observer.”

    This is an interesting point that it never came up in history. I know there was speculation about the third Lubavitcher Rebbe as well (same name also), but I’d like to look into this point more to see if it’s accurate. I don’t think Moshiach candidacy is necessarily unique to lubavitch Chassidus- I could be wrong- I don’t remember other names outright.

    The premise I’ve always heard is that if the Rambam put the criteria for the Moshiach candidate in a Halacha sefer, then it’s meant for us to act on it.

    As an aside, at the end of the day it’s how you view The Rebbes integrity as a person. If indeed he was a tzadik every observable moment, taught Torah etc, and led thousands back towards Hashem etc etc etc, then the logical thing at least to me, is to believe that when he did say these atypical statements, it was not for self promoting purposes (which anyone who came to The Rebbe felt that he highlighted their potential- not the opposite), rather this was his shlichus, and therefore his mandate to share.

    Now, someone unfamiliar with The Rebbe may hear the Moshiach stuff and think in the opposite direction, especially if encouraged by their personal Torah leader. But let’s not kid ourselves that there is a one and only litvish leader, there were many with different extremes on how they related to the Rebbe. And the one often quoted did not only view the Rebbe negatively but started controversy with other Torah leaders too- let’s not pretend that this is something limited to the Rebbes personal integrity.

    At the end of the day, lubavitch knows the Rebbe most intimately, and we make this judgment call of character to accept the Rebbe as our Rebbe, and therefore listen to what he says. It’s really that simple. A liar or imposter and a authentic Torah leader are worlds apart in character and teaching etc. And the thousands who are Lubavitcher Chassidim attest to the Rebbes integrity by their choice to be lubavitch.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264191
    CS
    Participant

    Yk

    “CS ought to offer an unequivocal apology to the many tens of thousands of sincere women who are “not blessed to learn and see the [so called] deeper side of Torah” but nevertheless do not find ‘their pleasure and down time in non Jewish movies’ .”

    Is it difficult to understand the words “Why she MAY”?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264192
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “he did not fit any of the criteria, again, as I have pointed out again and again.”

    Repeating it doesn’t make it a fact. We’ve personally gone through on this thread, yichus (I have the pages), yochuf (sources brought that it could be by influence / speech) and Melech (Rambams example).

    Would you like to list more that don’t fit?

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264193
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “The LR was certainly nothing like that. He was always right and never stopped trying to convince others that his way was the only correct way. One illustrative example is his constant “nagging” other Rebbes and Roshei Yeshivos to institute the study of chassidus, even though that would have been a departure from their mesores.”

    Complete misrepresentation. How about when the Rebbe personally checked up on the young Iranians saved from Iran (not Lubavitchers) and checked that they would have rice on Pesach even though it’s not our Minhag because it’s theirs?

    The Zirkind’s and other families who became lubavitch from chasseedish were encouraged to keep their levush.

    And of course, if he was so vain cvs , why would he care for every Jew? A vain person has enough of a challenge dealing with his own community.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264171
    CS
    Participant

    “CS, chabad are the ones who made a contest out of yiddishkeit. Do you ever use the phrase “kiddush Lubavitch”?”

    I could say the same thing to you. Can you list the top ten current leaders amongst the sefardim? The Rabbonim/ mashpiim in Ger? Bobov? Etc?

    It does seem that the bigger a group gets, the harder it is to know everyone within the community/ group, and we know “outsiders” even less.

    I think the term kiddush lubavitch is a defensive term which you could ask yourself why it needs to exist… Not hard to understand when you see how lubavitch is maligned by some…

    In any case, Chassidus teaches that all of Klal Yisrael are one body, with its leaders being the brain Neshamos, etc.

    Every part of Klal Yisrael is important to the whole. Seeing it in such a light, a contest is ridiculous.

    The Rebbe once said, if Satmar wouldn’t be so anti Zionist, we would need to be more…

    Similarly, the yishuvniks risk their lives for yishuv haaretz and thereby protect so many Jews.

    Satmar are renowned for their community wide Chessed/ bikur cholim etc.

    The Litvish highlight the supremacy of Torah learning

    And the list goes on and on…

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2264169
    CS
    Participant

    Just saying, I’m appreciating disclaimers generally, so the mods can clarify where the balance is, but again balance is key. I see my post was disclaimed as motzei Shem ra- at least it wasn’t edited in addition. To the best of my knowledge, motzei Shem ra means calling out others, whether by individual or community, falsely.

    If you Reread my post, you’ll see I did none of the above. I contrasted what I gained from personal, internalized hashkofa from Torah shebaal peh, with what could theoretically, logically happen with someone who doesn’t. I didn’t call out individuals or communities by name, and so the falsehood factor doesn’t apply either.

    try rereading your post

    If this is so mamash motzei shem ra, as I may be ignorant, please do list where I can look up the Halachic source that teaches what I did wrong.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263469
    CS
    Participant

    One comment on the women’s learning discussion- which I was pleased to read- I know the effects learning Chassidus which includes all other parts of Torah- and especially knowing how to learn on my own, has done for me and my peers. Personally, it has allowed me to find pleasure in Elokus, to set my own learning curriculum based on where my current interests are in Avodas Hashem. And my whole home has been elevated by it. Torah learning is strongly encouraged in our home, and there is no time I’ve ever asked my husband not to go learn. We bH now have a daily Dvar Torah by supper time, and Shabbos is my heavenly learning time aside from family time.

    All my peers who strive to be “Chassidish” (within Lubavitch), guard their homes from any non Jewish influence. There is no TV, non Jewish books (at least for entertainment purposes), and of course would never watch movies under any circumstances.

    Contrast this with a woman who grows up in a very frum home and community, but wasn’t blessed to learn and see the deeper side of Torah, it’s not hard to understand why she may find her pleasure and down time in non Jewish movies, music, books etc even if she’s dressed tznius to the hilt, and the impact this has on her home…

    disclaimer: mamash motzei shem rah

    Someone mentioned that lubavitch Is in the minority of encouraging girls to learn Torah shebaal peh. I find that hard to believe. Please list the many communities, as you put it, who don’t teach their girls Chumash and Rashi ( Rashi is Torah shebaal peh)? I only know of one. Thanks.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263468
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “And I have a question. If the Lubavicher rebbe was atzmus melubash beguf, and thus all-powerful, why wasn’t he able to avoid having a stroke, and avoid dying?”

    This shows a complete misunderstanding of the sicha and Chassidus in general. For such types of people- don’t read one liners out of sichos meant to denigrate Chabad because it will lead you to at least the issur of choshed biksherim if not much more….

    Like I said it’s not that complicated you just need the time and knowledge of learning. Start with Shaar haYichud BHoEmuna of Tanya…

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263467
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “So dor shevi’i is only something made up to suit the circumstances. Which is the type of ‘proof’ or argument that we have been disputing all along.”

    I don’t see where you got that. What I meant was that if Nesius would’ve ended with the Frierdiker Rebbe, there would have been no dor shvii as the dor goes by the Rebbe. Since we needed another Rebbe, that equals dor shvii

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263466
    CS
    Participant

    *note to mod about my story: I’m not claiming this is an official mesora on how to not teach girls. Rather, this was part of this girls experience along with other things. It may have been the particular teachers coping mechanism to explain why she couldn’t learn further. (She wasn’t litvish in case you were wondering.)

    And to whoever was outraged that Chabad saved the day yet again: bH, we did in that case and many other cases. No reason to be intimidated if you have the same approach of helping any Jew. It’s not a contest.

    When the war started someone posted- were all in the army- depends which brigade.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263465
    CS
    Participant

    Gutte voch from my locality.

    Yb
    “Or , Phrased in another way – If you, CS, would be put in a ‘time machine’ , transported to the 1990 – 1994 era , and would be commenting on these pages , would you ‘explain’ those hazal like the shitah of ‘then habad’ or like you do now ?”

    I have no idea. In my experience a) The women weren’t as involved in the combative politics and b) the whole era is a sensitive topic. Therefore I haven’t gotten clear info yet from the Chabad side on this but I’ll keep it in mind. Just to make sure I have you right, you say the reason others didn’t see The Rebbe as a candidate for Moshiach (obviously among the ones who didn’t) had nothing to do with the alive or dead debate? So what was it then? Just so I have you clear.

    Secondly, of course there may be personal bias involved when learning- personally I question anything that doesn’t add up to me as things come up in learning. This is also why it’s so important to have the guidance of a mashpia and Rav so you don’t just go down a self deluded lane.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262163
    CS
    Participant

    Regarding women’s learning, there’s only one group that I know of today in the frum world that completely still holds by not teaching females Torah shebaal peh. And from that group, I personally taught a girl my age Chassidus, because she was a smart girl and wasn’t satisfied with being told that if she asks questions she might die because in Heaven they have all the answers etc.

    *note: this is not an actual response taught to girls per any hashkofo

    Her smart parents realized it’s better to send her to lubavitch than lose her to Yiddishkeit. BH she is doing very well today.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262162
    CS
    Participant

    Aaq

    Arso”AlwaysAsk, I disagree. If there are 2-3 talmidei chachomim who recognize someone as a t”ch, but many others consider him close to an apikorus, someone who misleads, or a meshuggene, the 2-3 are not enough. Especially when the detractors are recognized gedolei olam.”

    Just for some truth, it’s much likely the other way around. Many many many respected gedolim held of the Rebbe. I think there’s even a sefer on it now, written by a past chasseedish chossid who became lubavitch, and did the research, so we don’t have to listen to lies like this.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262161
    CS
    Participant

    Arso,

    “And of course I won’t ask you for a source in a sicha because I don’t believe what it says there.”

    Isn’t it a tad ridiculous to expect me to trust you’re know what you know, and completely disregard an open printed statement of the Rebbe when you’re talking about what the Rebbe said??

    “Finally, if the LR did indeed say taht women should learn gemoro even when it is not directly relevant to their performing mitzvos in which they are obligated, isn’t that going against explicit halacha?”

    No, The same way every bais Yaakov teaches mefarshim on the Chumash and Navi today (all Torah shebaal peh- not directly related to mitzvos bichlal.) Same rationale- times have changed. if women ARE being educated to think critically, and ARE receiving an advanced secular education, not seeing the depth within Torah= dangerous set up hashkafically.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262159
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    It’s been some time since I looked up that Gemara. I had remembered the Rashi as only being two words, and now I see you did quote it correctly. My bad. So Rashi himself brings two ways of interpreting the reference to Rebbi and Daniel- 1 kgon, 2- interestingly he says HAINU- this is Rabeinu hakadosh if alive (then I guess) and then repeats Kgon when speaking of Daniel

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262156
    CS
    Participant

    Arso

    “One other thing that came to me, if the LR at any stage claimed his father-in-law was Mashiach, how does that fit in with the LR being the Mashiach because he is dor shevi’i?”

    Dor Shvii only happened because as the Rebbetzin told the Rebbe- “if you don’t accept the nesius, all my fathers work will go to waste…”

    The Rebbe made it clear in his opening maamar that he’s there to assist the Chassidim, but it has to be their own work. (Interesting how we’re in the same position today, yet the Chassidim now do have the power to continue… methinks this suggests a deeper layer of meaning.)

    In other words, dor hashvii was really for the sake of the Chassidim, that Chabad shouldn’t disintegrate, but mitzad HaRebbe, all the brachos and direction he gave was from his father in law, which was why he visited the Ohel so often.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262142
    CS
    Participant

    “In the latest edition of Mishpacha it says that Rabi David Abuchatzira had a 50 minute private meeting with the Argentinian president, and very soon afterwards the hostages were freed.”

    I’ve actually heard this Mekubal mentioned a few times recently (also that he met Moshiach.) I love hearing about actual Tzaddikim in our time. I wish there was a way to find out more about him. Of course, I’ve heard much about the Baba Sali as well and have nothing but the greatest respect.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262139
    CS
    Participant

    Yb
    “It was very simply – Based on the NORMATIVE JEWISH BELIEF that mashiach , ONCE HE STARTED could not die [in any shape or form] , otherwise he would be proven as Mashiach Sheker.
    .
    You are just repeating PROPAGANDA .
    And blindly so.”

    I find this difficult, as I myself learned in the sichos, The Rebbes said many many times that his father in law should take us out of golus. And at least in one place, he specified that he could have techias hameisim with the earlier wave of Tzaddikim etc as moshiach.

    I find it hard to reconcile that the Chassidim of the time didn’t know this…

    I know I should really ask someone from the older generation, but until then, would you have a source? It’s not anywhere in the sichos. And Rabbanim and mashpiim could be wrong. We’ve corrected them before (asa community) when that was the case

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261914
    CS
    Participant

    “ What exactly do you mean by “So that’s it”? Do you mean that we can’t argue with it because you asked a ‘respected’ L Rav? If that’s what you mean, then I want to point out that if the Rav in question said what you claim he said, I, and I am sure many others on this thread, do not respect him at all.

    And if by “So that’s it” you mean that you feel satisfied in maintaining your view, then it is simply another example of choosing what to believe in to suit yourself. Remember the moshol about shooting the arrows and then drawing the target?”

    As far as I understand, if you aren’t sure about a question of Halacha or hashkafa, you ask your Rav. That’s what I did so that’s it for me. Don’t get how you see this to be drawing around arrows- hopefully this is normative frum behavior for you.

    Because yes, Gemara, rashi, Ramban, sdei chemed are all Torah sources but not the only way of Halacha lmaase. I’m sure you’ve heard of shivim panim laTorah.

    Happens to be this specific Rav I asked is so busy and usually quite curt- I felt bad to ask his sources, nor do I need to as there’s other learned people I’m in touch with.

    And no, this isn’t the only type of Rav in Lubavitch. I’m very lucky to have found my main Rav who is very patient and we do go back and forth on hashkofa

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261917
    CS
    Participant

    Just a thought: we were singing the niggun Yifrach byomov tzaddik… At the shabbos table, And my husband pointed out that it mentions that Moshiach will rule from the Sea… And from the River.

    Something tells me that Hamas is Amalek. They’re not even real Yishmealim genetically for the most part. Besides for our sources, I saw a Saudi guy blasting them on video as the riffraff of nations

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261916
    CS
    Participant

    @HaLeivi- when I say most Lubavitcher shuls, I should correct it to- many. I have no idea the actual ratio.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261915
    CS
    Participant

    HaLeivi

    “ I do not believe that Lubavitch has any special emphasis on Davening. I’ve Davenned in Lubavitcher Minyanim and it sounds like any Litvisher davening.”

    Yes, this is something very new. The Rebbes minyan didn’t take very long. Avodas HaTefillah is still emphasized in yeshivos- some probably more than others. But something common in Chabad of the Rebbes generation, we say a page of perek 41 of Tanya before davening to take some time to think about Hashem and start off on the right foot.

    The Rebbe very much emphasized helping another yid- comparing it to having the opportunity to put out a fire (assimilation.) So maybe that’s the reason for the shorter davening. However, The Rebbe very much emphasized that one can only give to others what what has within oneself- so we do need to take time for our personal Avodas Hashem of davening and learning .

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261912
    CS
    Participant

    HaLeivi

    “ What are the practical ramifications of deciding that a certain person is destined to become Moshiach?

    Does it boil down to whether or not to say Yechi?”

    Not really. Most Lubavitcher shuls do not allow public recitals of yechi. It’s really just an inyan of Emuna and feeling the imminence of Geula by living with a geula mindset and seeing signs of it in the world etc

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2261913
    CS
    Participant

    Arso- regarding women learning Gemara. I’ve learned inside the Rebbes sichos to women myself (this one quoted in beginning of the black sefer hamitzvos divided by shiur) the opposite. So I’ll take that over your unnamed source.

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 1,901 total)