Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
CSParticipant
@neville noted. May it continue 🙂
@joseph @rso the mashpiims wives are definitely tznius. In general the Rebbe encouraged us women to dress beautifully and tzniusly. Afaik this is the Jewish approach not just Chabad, although we may differ on particulars such as sheitels. In any case the chassidishe couples – the men watch their eyes and don’t look out for not tznius pics vdal and the women dress beautifully and tzniusly.Yes there are others who struggle. There are also Beis Yaakov graduates who dress the same but somehow no one calls them beis Yaakov girls, whereas all of our graduates are termed full on lubavitch so that’s not a fair comparison.
I really shouldn’t necessarily respond to that post as it was just meant to provoke, but I didn’t want to allow that slander against mashpiims wives to pass and shtika khodoah…
CSParticipant@non political
“The Masilat Yesharim is saying that the very purpose for which man was created is pleasure and the place for experiencing pleasure in the most perfect way is in olam haba. ”
Aha thanks for context. So then this could be answered by Olam haba referring to olam hatechiya as elaborated above where we’ll all have the ultimate of pleasure as it says kol Yisrael… Yes?
CSParticipantKnaidlach yes there is a description of the chassidishe farm settlement in the times of the Mitteler Rebbe (born 1773) proudly wearing their talis koton over their shirts as they worked.
The consensus on the untucked shirts is that it’s a bochur shtick which is given tacit encouragement (no one makes it a thing and tells them too that would defeat the purpose) by the fact that some older mashpiim also don’t tuck in…
And Im sure that even the Menahelim that give knasim for untucked shirts and tell the bochurim they need to look respectable, would prefer that this is the bochur shtick than taking it in the other direction, for example, not dancing with abandon on simchas Torah because they don’t want to scuff their shoes (There are many chassidishe stories scorning such behavior) or even worse caring about brand names etc.
Teenagers tend to take things to an extreme.when they grow up a bit, they get the fine lines. We’d all rather they overdo the not being into Gashmius than the opposite as that is the role of a bochur – to be fully mufshat
from Gashmius Olam hazeh and fully immersed in the Olam HaTorahCSParticipantAgreed sechel. Your last post expresses the reality well. Good to hear from you again. Gutte voch!
CSParticipantBefore my earlier post gets lost for reference I think I should revise. There is definitely the emphasis on bittul and not priding oneself for ones wealth or even spiritual standing (you would see that expressed practically with the lack of kovod people attribute for themselves and the lack of classes with the rich or not, everyone mixes without airs, for the most part) but I guess the rich / poor thing neville was saying isn’t the reason for current lubavitch dress as all the other Rebbeim wore streimlach or the like and only our Rebbe dressed differently the reasons for which were brought earlier in the thread. We just go after our Rebbe.
As far as the tie thing to me it makes perfect sense but that’s for another post.
Sechel youre addressing from your perspective and circles and I’m addressing from the discussions I’ve heard between my father and brothers who were in Yeshiva and my husband and brother in law who is a shliach in Yeshiva… There is that way of thinking or all bochurim would just tuck in. It is a topic of conversation and discussion among lubavitchers and its silly to make it sound as if everyone tucks in because you do, when that’s not the case. There are different approaches in different yeshivos as well. My brother is in a Yeshiva where the married Mashpia doesn’t tuck in apparently (and its mainstream, not detroit and not Queens etc) although that is rare. Some of my other brothers have attended another Yeshiva where the bochurim would get a knas for an untucked shirt
CSParticipantAs for the tie thing, there’s a balance between looking menschlich and between jewish pride and the Jewish look. So the older chassidim belong to a time where if you didn’t wear a tie you were seen as uncivilised and not a mentch.
So the Rebbe wore and shluchim wore but when an eltere chossid wore to a farbrengen, the Rebbe said you’re wearing this rag too?! And encouraged him to take it off.
At the same time shluchim don’t try to look cool and trendy at all. Full beard dress code etc.
Younger shluchim live in an era where formality is down the drain and ceos wear torn jeans. So some feel a tie is unnecessary veltishe hanachos and they’re fine without
CSParticipantI don’t know if visualisation is the right word and if the mashal I’m using is the best one but I saw a good animated video clip on it and it is pretty good. Anyhow I relate to Hashem as this Supernal Being Who provides life for everyone and is the life force of everything although the everything isn’t Him. But all of that pales and is nothing compared to Who He really is which is far above anything related to the world (like you wouldn’t praise a king as possessing 100 pennies) and nevertheless He wants us to praise Him with what we appreciate and our puny concerns from our very limited viewpoint.
Anyhow the visual I for the concept would be energy or electricity which is present everywhere, is manifest in lamps and is their essence and being without them being electricity themselves…
CSParticipantNeville you got it on target. Some of our boys serving as bochurim shluchim in yeshivos and thus are role models for the bochurim will prefer the not tucked in shirt to convey that bochurim should not obsess with their appearance. The vast majority of the men do tuck in as it looks more mesudar. I guess they tuck.in for dates and after marriage. Of course there are bochurim who come from home where being mesudar in all areas is stressed so they will tuck in
and there are married men who don’t, mainly fiery Israelis. It’s not an obsession either way but there is a message there…I guess another way this tone was set was the Rebbe wearing a tie but strongly encouraging his chassidim not to. Same idea behind.
CSParticipantI’ve learned a maamar on gan Eden vs. Yemos
haMoshiach which are both termed Olam haba.I’ll share the applicable nugget I remember happy to refer you further if desired…
Basically gan Eden rewards the neshama and personal perfection represented by the learning of Torah as Torah changes ones mindset and thereafter middos, and brings ultimate refinement to a person.That’s why not everyone gets there.
Moshiach rewards the body and refinement of the world, accomplished by the avoda of Maase hamitzvos. Since every yid does mitzvos, every yid (neshama at least there’s a whole other discussion regarding gilgulim) will be part and earn it. And it is even loftier than gan Eden which is why all the neshamos of the greatest people like the avos etc will leave gan Eden to have tchias hameisim and enjoy yemos hamoshiach.
CSParticipantAnother note:admittedly, I haven’t learned mesilas yesharim insid, but that being said, I think you find the Rashi discouraging because you’re coverging two different levels together:
Meaning, (if I guess the context correctly), the mesilas yesharim is saying to focus on the pleasures and rewards of next world and make that the focus of our lives so we don’t get carried away by the temporary pleasures of this world and lose track of our mission and then be overwhelmingly embarrassed upstairs…
However that is helpful baby steps in Avodas Hashem because as pirkei avos says we shouldn’t be like those who serve the Master for reward but like those who don’t do it for reward.
Ie.this is a helpful train of thought when we are struggling with an immediate temptation so we don’t fall for it. But the end goal is not to be self servants focused on our own rewards but Hashem’s servants who ask ourselves what does He want from me? And internalise His desire for a G-dly world, as our own, and work to get there to do it for Him out of love and awe. When the focus isn’t on
self service, but on Hashem service, then the Rashi won’t be depressingAnother note: the Rashi may be referring to whoever enters gan Eden right away, which are those who don’t need to be scrubbed clean first in gehennom. The majority of us don’t fall into the truly righteous category and have some cleaning up to do before we can bask and enjoy the Shechina. However, if you are a frum Jew and do your best with the fall here and there, then the clean up isn’t so massive (the gemara gives a time limit I just forget if it’s 3, 9 or 12 months) and then you are free to enjoy the good you have created forever without the nasty reminder of the other stuff…
October 4, 2018 8:14 am at 8:14 am in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1598250CSParticipantHave we added that he closed down the plo office in Washington? He really does seem to be a moshiach agent sent to fight against the anti Torah liberals and bring down yishmael which is the last power before moshiach as foretold in nevuchadnetzars famous dream in Daniel
October 3, 2018 10:23 am at 10:23 am in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597662CSParticipantI think this is why Joseph cannot answer our question with any concrete example of what he means by subservient today: because all he likes to do is bring sources that show the husband is the head of the home, which we all agree with but then uses insulting language and insinuating that are not real or twisted out of context.
For example (here’s one source I’ll fully address aside from the Rambam one I addressed already ) he brings how Sara calls her husband master.
Yet he very well knows (unless he was just cherry picking sources and is ignorant of the rest of beraishis) that in beraishis 18:3 Avraham calls the three men he wants to invite as guests his masters. So this shows it was just a common expression of respect back then but would sound demeaning and degrading today.So Joseph you want to know what the Torah is telling us? There should be mutual respect. Sara addressed her husband in a respectful manner by addressing him as if he was higher than her (just like he did with the Arab guests) and he, in another example, pitched her tent first. He converted the men, she, the women.
No one has an issue with this. We just don’t like when you twist your sources as you attempted to do above by just quoting Sara addressing Avraham as master and leaving it at that to imply that a woman is a status below a man and should be treated as such. As you do with all your sources.
OK I’ll do one more.
“As far as listening, Bava Metzia 59a says a husband who listens to his wife on matters of religion/ruchniyos issues will end up in gehenom”
True. The Torah also says to Avraham “whatever Sarah says, listen to her.”
I’m sure you knew that. It’s famous because it centers on the discussion of whether to send away yishmael and is simple chumash not an obscure gemara.
How do both make sense?Simple. To me at least. (The Rebbe said the last part so I didn’t make it up but it’s also logical sense.)
Since the woman’s role is centered around the materialistic down to earth needs of her family, she tends to focus on that. So she will be pushing her husband towards materiality, to make more money say, instead of to learn more
So generally, the gemara was giving the good advice that a husband should be a head in spiritual matters of the home and not follow his wifes guidance.
But if she is a woman like Sara (and this is how all Jewish women will be by moshiachs times, the Rebbe adds which is why it is written in kabbala on the posuk of aishes chayil ateres baala, and nikeiva tosoveiv gever) then she will be able to see things on a loftier spiritual plane (with regards to
ruach hakodesh as rashi comments on that episode) and her husband should listen to her.So it depends. Reading the memoirs of gluckel of hameln showed me this prototype of Jewish women. Simple emuna but very materialistic.
However today from what I see it seems to be the norm for many homes that the wives encourage the husbands to learn more, go to Minyan etc. especially with the education girls receive today which they didn’t have back then. It’s not just now, there have always been great women who led their husbands spiritually in the right direction. Sara and Avraham with yishmael. Rivkah with the brochos. Rachel and Rabbi Akiva. Etc.
So again what would be the lesson of the source you brought there? That if you are married to a wife whose values are materialistic, then don’t take her guidance in spiritual matters or that will lead you to gehennom. However even in such a situation she would have more of a say on house decorating, what house to live in etc because that’s more her domain.
October 3, 2018 10:23 am at 10:23 am in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597625CSParticipantThe Rebbe said a series of Rashi sichos where he analysed the depth of rashi, Rashis difficulty with the posuk and the many gems and lessons within. There is allot shakla vtarya there and often it ends off with a beautiful lesson.
One such memorable lesson I remember is on the Rashi of vayita oholo where rashi comments that the word is written ohola, her tent, to hint that Avraham pitched his wife’s tent before his own.
The Rebbe asks where rashi based his chiddush from and why he didn’t quote a source for the ben chomesh lmikra. He answers that the ben chomesh lmikra doesn’t need a source and doesn’t see it as a great chiddush because he sees Avraham Avinus behaviour reflected in his own home by the way his father treats his mother.
So Joseph can bring a bunch of sources from today till next year, bringing more and more to prove that the man ought to be master. We normal people who have been brought up in healthy frum homes and/or are in healthy marriages (I wouldn’t be so worried about Josephs wife, he is most probably either a bachelor or divorced) know that we respect our husbands as the heads of the home and take their guidance especially in spiritual matters seriously (assuming they are spiritually healthy. If not we strive to help them grow with encouragement). They in turn ask for our opinions and consult us on household matters and we both make sure we are on the same pages with chinuch etc. Some things we have more of the decision making role some things our husbands but we strive to discuss things together and come to decisions together in mutual respect. That is the Torah way and has been the way of healthy Jewish homes since the first.
October 3, 2018 1:25 am at 1:25 am in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597663CSParticipant@milhouse first of all nice to hear from you on here. Are you a newcomer?
Second of all thanks for providing a source that shows of a place where it seems that Jewish marriage is only the men being servile / slaves (to use Joseph terminology) aka obligated to the woman and where the woman doesn’t respond likewise. Just quoting that as reference to the roles of men and women in a Jewish marriage would of course be twisted but that’s exactly what Joseph does with his quotes on women / s obligations without context.October 3, 2018 12:34 am at 12:34 am in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597624CSParticipantTruth is any source can be construed in multiple ways to create injustice or the opposite and you often have to see how it plays out in real life. For example, people in the Jewish world were saying that halacha cvs allows child abuse because abusers tend to touch children without adults around and halachically children are not witnesses… But now with the swing liberalism has taken, we are seeing how much evil can be done when uncorroberated allegations are taken as fact, despite the lack of witnesses, and can be used to destroy people who have led righteous lives for as long as anyone knows…
And abusers don’t typically stop with one victim unfortunately and are eventually caught…
So something that may have been seen as condoning evil cvs is now being seen as protecting innocent people.
We can say the same here. Muslims and Jews seem to have similar laws of modesty, similar language and emphasis with the husband being the head of the household and the wife glorified as the mother etc… Yet look into Muslim society and you see that they don’t protect women with their modesty, they degrade them, beat them, and even honour kill them. So the whole talk of the modesty being a women’s protection of her honour etc is a sham.
Contrast that with the relationship between Jewish men and their wives, now and throughout the generations and you see mutual respect of each other and complementing roles, with the exceptions here and there that occur in any body of people.that is all the proof you need of what master means.
October 3, 2018 12:27 am at 12:27 am in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597626CSParticipantA source that showcases this relationship even with the areas that are the mans domain:
In a well known gemara (men can fill us in on the exact page) it discusses three questions a husband should ask his wife as
shabbos comes in. I think they are : have you separated challa? Maaser? Lit the candles?In the ensuing discussion, one of the chachamim says that I always asked these questions in a very soft tone. Another responds of course! Otherwise I wouldn’t be listened to…
Divrei chachamim bnachas nishmain.
So even when the husband should be the master if he acts despicably, his wife will not respect him. The same is true of the reverse of course. Even though a husband is obligated to give his wife emotional support if she is cold and nasty she can’t expect that. The most either can do is file for divorce with a beis din who will examine who is at fault. But in a Jewish marriage both parties are expected to be mentchen and respect each other.
September 30, 2018 12:38 pm at 12:38 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597283CSParticipant@philosopher busy here for yt too, but am familiar with the quotes Joseph brought. I’ve learned beraishis I’ve learned the whole hilchos ishus and nashim in Rambam. And the last gemara as well all makes sense within context. Just a quick note for now happy to go in depth in specifics after yt:
The mastery or enslavement of women Joseph speaks of is as you said missing context. A wife is not subservient to men. But you her husband she does have obligations some of which are / were servile and are based on what is considered a woman’s job at the time (no one washes their husbands feet and face today because while back then that was normal for wives and am expression of endearment today it would just be weird and demeaning as it isn’t the norm today.)
Her obligations are described as mishubedes enslaved. He also has his obligations to her in fact his are recorded explicitly in the Torah and there are others brought in chazal.
If either fail in their obligations they can get a divorce – he doesn’t whip her or rape her if she refuses to do her responsibilities but he can claim the right to divorce. She
can also file for divorce in beis din if he fails his obligations to her.They both need to respect each other. Men have a need to be respected as an officer as the Rambam says she should view him. Ie that she respects him as in looks up to him. Women want to admire their husbands and don’t need to be looked up to in return but need their husbands to treat them with proper dignity as human beings and equals, as the Rambam says he should respect her MORE than himself.
Anyway gotta get back to menu planning..
Gut yom Tov to all!!September 30, 2018 12:38 pm at 12:38 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597288CSParticipantWe may possibly be able to clear this up pretty quickly. Joseph what do you mean by women being subservient to their husbands that apply today (not in other centuries in different circumstances)?
September 29, 2018 11:47 pm at 11:47 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597181CSParticipantAlthough we do have the curse of vhu yimshol bach which does result in women being more easygoing and usually more willing to let the husband win in arguments (or think he won) because they care for the general relationship more than being right.
But it’s not a halacha women must give in all the time..it’s a curse. I’ve never seen men insist that they cannot use air conditioning or work in an office because of their curse of earning their bread by the sweat of their brow… It’s a curse not an ideal.
September 29, 2018 11:14 pm at 11:14 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597179CSParticipant@philosopher +1
September 29, 2018 11:02 pm at 11:02 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597171CSParticipantTo clarify: im not saying that Torah says women should never do any work that a maidservant would do, quite the opposite and that is one of the main ways she endears herself to her husband and they have great sholom bayis – its by serving him in various ways.HOWEVER he for his part greatly respects her (more than himself as the same Rambam you quoted above goes on to say) and treats her like a queen and equal.
I think a great example of this is Rabbi Akivas wife Rochel. She worked really hard, in extreme poverty, and then raised the children herself did all housework etc while her husband left to learn for 24 years. However he made it clear that all the Torah he and his students had acquired was in her merit and he bought her a golden crown as soon as he could afford it to make up for the difficult times she slaved away. This represents the ideas above.
September 29, 2018 11:01 pm at 11:01 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597170CSParticipantEdit: So, not shoo
September 29, 2018 11:01 pm at 11:01 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597169CSParticipantEdit: Torah giants throughout history
September 29, 2018 10:28 pm at 10:28 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597156CSParticipantYou’re right you didnt address it to me and honestly I’m perfectly happy to leave it to philosopher or anyone else who is willing to address. I saw he didn’t address the sources you posted so that’s why I said I can wroite up a response of needed, although im happy to leave it if people realise its just your view but not mainstream Judaism.
The reason why I constantly give my two cents about this is because I want to counteract several serious problems that can arise from these kind of posts:
1) a non Jew / not frum / traditional yid can read your post and come away with the mistaken understanding that Jewish men view and most therefore probably treat their wives and daughters and women in general like maidservants/ inferior
and not as equals.this is a chillul Hashem as it has never been the case among the Torah giants of today, nor is it Torah hashkafa.2) a fresh baal/as teshuva / even a frum bais Yaakov maidel who never learned and isn’t able to learn, the sources you post, can come away with negative feelings towards Yiddishkeit for the same reason or negative feelings about her role in Am Yisrael if she is fooled into thinking her role is inferior.
3) a man who isn’t sufficiently learned / brought up in a frum environment can read your posts and base his hashkafa and attitude towards his wife etc. to be overcontrolling and then tell her this is Torah ( I know of a case like this -not from your posts but from the ideas within which he must have come across in some way. His wife didn’t know any better. When she eventually found out the truth they almost got divorced, and bh reconciled after he changed his behaviour.)
Shoo I really really think if after all the discussion on many threads something isn’t sitting right with you even though you see that its not mainstream hashkafa etc, you should not keep posting these kind of things, but should look up a hashkafa book on the matter which addresses all these sources and more (I can recommend one I know, I’m sure there are others).
September 29, 2018 10:27 pm at 10:27 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597160CSParticipantSince as philosopher said, the view is that we have different roles, and personalities etc, in some ways men will be superior, in some ways women. So to bring sources that only show one without the other and then conclude that men are better full stop is wrong and misleading. In many of your sources it actually does show where women are superior / men are obligated to women as well, and you only bring the male on top piece.
As far as my way of writing, I write what I’ve learned but don’t look up and list every source as that would take much more time and lengthen my posts very much. But if you ever ask me on something I say that you want the source, im happy to provide. I’m pretty sure I’ve written when I’ve inferred something on my own and challenged you to counter it by proving it isn’t in line with the seforim (you didn’t). Some is pure contextual logic and unless you counter it and show why it isn’t the case/ the logic isn’t sound,, there’s no reason to say that I didn’t address it properly.
Anyhow my main point is please think about the dangers of posting these kind of posts that aren’t in line with mainstream hashkafa and can cause the serious outcomes mentioned above (especially after its been brought up and discussed by you in so many threads already).
September 28, 2018 5:29 pm at 5:29 pm in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597068CSParticipantJoseph your question/ obsession has been addressed many times on many threads. I don’t feel a need to answer again except that this is the Internet where people can think your unfortunate twisted perspective on men bashing women represents Yiddishkeit. It’s ironic that because you detest the male bashing in popular culture you constantly strive to engage in women bashing – except you try to cloak it in Torah hashkafa, which it isn’t and which the male bashing never attempts to do.
so I guess if anyone feels that they want me to address this again, I will just to clear it up.Gutten moed everyone including Joseph. Nothing personal just don’t like seeing distortions represented as Torah. Especially where there is chillul Hashem involved.
CSParticipant” It is for his losses, what he is giving up both Ruchniyus and Gashmius that hurts me.”
Of course. Torah and mitzvos gives us the best life possible. We are not missing out, they are. The lack of direction and morals in the world, sheva mitzvos bnei noach etc in the world today is depressing thousands of secular youth and destroying countless lives rachmana litzlan.
A male relative of mine, who married at 21, went jogging once with another young not yet frum young man, when he was helping out the shluchim on the campus. My relative was engaged at that point.
His jogging partner confided to him that “You’ll probably never understand me, but I don’t plan on getting married.”
My relative asked why.
The other young man responded that there is no trust and faithfulness nowadays, and young married women will commonly cheat with other men. So why should he commit to her, and all the finances etc that he would lose in event of divorce?
My relative responded that he completely understand and if that was the world he lived in, he wouldn’t get married either.
I also have a close relative who went off. In his case he really wants to come back he has just lost his self control. He is planning on saving up money to go to a BT Yeshiva program and marry a graduate of the girls program. He went off at 16 and is now 23.
It can take time. It can be a process. But this relative is happy to come home for Shabbos, and keep whatever family rules he needs to. His life plan is to marry that graduate at 25
things have taken him awhile as his brain was hijacked by drugs and the medication needed to avoid psychosis as a result. But it looks like he’ll head in the right direction iyh.there’s definitely hope. Keep the doors open and your son will eventually come back iyh. We have the richest life there is.CSParticipant“Chabadshlucha, I also asked about it being sung at a male-only event. (I gave some examples.) Based on your comment it appears you’d see that the same as singing shelo asani goy at a Jewish-only event”
No its different. It is advisable and admirable to keep ourselves apart from the goyim so that we can retain the extra kedusha and standards we are expected to have as Hashem’s holy nation. Therefore the song is OK even as the message is we are not goyim, as long as it is sung in appropriate settings as mentioned above.
However as explained above, men and women are two halves of one wholesome persona and unit, and as such such a song or celebration of male advantages is just weird and bad middos as it comes across as bashing the females, even if sung at a male only event.
We are meant to work together and strengthen each other, quietly thank Hashem for our unique maalos and appreciate the others strengths as well, not tout our superiority in one area or another and bash the other gender.
There is also plenty of material to make male bashing songs based on women’s maalos. But Torah isn’t there to promote gaava, egoism and destruction of others… Quite the opposite.
Deracheha darchei noam vchol nesovoseha *shalom*.
CSParticipant@Rafi bar
I remember another father whose child was going through this and he took it very hard. His Rav told him that every child has his path in this world – some need to go through certain phases as part of their journey. Your job and responsibility is not to ensure how your child turns out – that’s not in your hands. Your job is to do the best you can with the chinuch of your child – and if you have done that then you should not feel to blame over how the child turned out.CSParticipantNot every Bracha is meant to be celebrated and sung. Some things we emphasise some we don’t although we appreciate them and even make a Bracha for them. I think a great example is the miracle of how Hashem makes our bodily functions work. We even have a Bracha for it – asher yatzar. However as of yet, no singer has decided to make this a wedding song, and there’s a reason why… Same here.
CSParticipant@slominer
If there was a sheva mitzvos bnei noach event, shelo asani goy would be an insensitive and definitely offensive song to play despite the bnei noach knowing that we have special mitzvos and even status in Hashem’s eyes. It would be really wrong and can’t imagine it giving Hashem any nachas to say the least.The reason why these song exist is more celebrating the Jewish life and the meaning it gives us (like in the Yiddish one Avraham fried sings.)
Its not bad middos because we only play it at Jewish events and even with the goyim there, we assume they don’t understand Yiddish and Hebrew.(And in the rare exception s/he will understand that they werent meant to understand it so no offense was meant.)
Whereas men and women are one family unit. We are not different societies, like the Essenes were, nor are we meant to be. A Jewish life is family life where men and women share their lives together. As such, a song celebrating shelo asani isha would definitely be in bad taste and middos even though we know and are not offended by the actual Bracha and the fact our men say it.
CSParticipant“Feminism has made us think that there are 2 kings in the home, that is a recipe for divorce. No organization has 2 ceo’s, the same goes for marriage”
Agreed. To understand how vhu yimshol bach goes together in a Torah marriage with women being referred to as his other half, or plag gufa in the Zohar, it is helpful to understand the difference between the brain and heart.
Both are equally vital and important ; a person cannot survive with missing either.
However if there is a conflict between the brain and heart, like, for example with the heart desiring a sugary treat, and the brain claiming it is not good for health, then the heart should follow the brain *because that is best for BOTH of them.*
In the Jewish home, the wife is the heart. She creates the atmosphere of the home, and imbues her family and environment with the heart of Simcha, emuna, bitachon, ahavas Hashem, Yiras Hashem, ahavas yisrael etc.
The husband is the brain of the home: he gives the spiritual guidance and direction for the family.
In a case of conflict, the husband should have the final say as he is better able to make decisions that are not influenced by emotion, but it is his achrayus to show and explain to his wife how this is for her best interests as well.
This is a Torah marriage. Not a king and slave. And not two battling kings.
A man and woman are opposites, eizer knegdo and only through their opposite inclinations and influence can healthy balance be achieved. (I can give examples on their opposite attributes and how they balance each other if desired.)
CSParticipant*more rachamim (not raisins) from Hashem regarding the churban.
CSParticipant@haimy:
“Adam was created first, Hashem took his rib away and made Chava from it.”Yes that is true and one interpretation of “tzelah” and one chazal about the creation of woman.
The other equally valid and true chazal is the one I mentioned above (which also sheds light on other pesukim).
The first one emphasises the quality of extra tznius that was invited in women more than men. The second teaches us that although the woman’s role is the receiver, and the more private role, it is equal to the mans and one is not complete without the other. They are two halves of one whole.“Chava owes her life to Adam for sharing his rib.”
Last I checked Hashem created them both and this was the way He chose to create her. Adam did not create her, he didn’t even help.
“After Chava fed Adam from the Eta Hadaas Hashem Said “venue yimshol boch” he will rule over you.”
Yes, that is a curse not a good thing. Do you try to fulfil the verse in Torah “Vhoyisa meshuga?” It is and has been the unfortunate reality of the golus world. But we don’t need to sanction it the same we we aren’t dying to be persecuted although that is one of the curses of golus. In fact, we do and should do our best to defeat it. Jewish men throughout history have prided themselves on treating their wives with respect UNLIKE the goyim. I’m not sure where this attitude of pride in vhu yimshol bach comes from.
As chazal tell us “Isha kesheira oseh ritzon baalah”
Yes but that is unconnected to the above. He is supposed to set the spiritual standards high in the home, and in that case, she fulfils his will as a good Jewish wife. If not, with wisdom, she can oseh, recreate, his will to be more in line with Hashems.“A wife is meant to be subservient to her husband as his eizer. He is to be treated as a king while he treats her as his queen.”
No issue with that. It’s true and has the Torah balance. He is King and she is Queen. Not he is spiritual, a potential malach, master and she is… A yente and servant. Some posts above read that way and its a distortion of Torah values.
“Feminism has made us think that there are 2 kings in the home, that is a recipe for divorce. No organization has 2 ceo’s, the same goes for marriage.
CSParticipantIt really depends on why he went off. Generally nowadays is an emotional reason not an intellectual one (although to justify it after the fact they may seek intellectual reasons as well.) important to know the cause. If it was due to negative emotional experiences, then probably number one is not advisable as it implies, atop the baggage he already has, that you don’t care about HIM, but just about his frumkeit level. Generally, the way to bring them back is with love and unconditional acceptance (although that doesn’t mean accepting / encouraging their behaviour, and also doesn’t mean you can’t set rules for their behaviour in your house).
But really every child is an individual, and healing the cause of why they went off helps to bring them back.
Also every mitzvah they do / are happy to do with you, counts. It’s not all or nothing.
CSParticipantThey are distortions because a person reading it comes away with the impression that men are everything in Yiddishkeit and women are second place, merely yentas,servants or property etc. It’s not about quoting sources necessarily, it’s about the context they are quoted in.
For example I could list ten examples of women in the Torah and portray them in this way:
1) Hashem told Avraham to listen to everything Sarah says as her nevuah was greater. This was the first Jewish woman.
2) The women were the ones in whose merit we were redeemed from Mitzrayim not the men.
3) Chana is the one we learn how to daven from.
4) the men failed by chet haegel and the women stood strong.
5) the women were the first to donate to the building of the Mishkan.
6) the women all got to go into eretz Yisrael whereas that generation of men died because they chose to believe the 10 miraglims bad report while the women trusted Moshe rabbeinu.
7) Hashem told Moshe to speak to the women first regarding Matan Torah
8) the woman makes the child Jewish
9) the chachamim preferred Chulda over Yirmiyahu because, as a woman, they hoped she would be able to invoke more raisin from Hashem regarding the churban.
10) its in the merit of the women that moshiach will come.
Great. 10 sources. Now you tell me: by reading these sources does that depict the correct roles of men and women in Yiddishkeit? Or its a distortion by lack of context?
CSParticipantIf any woman (or man) is bothered or offended by any of these posts, please let me know and I’ll answer. Otherwise I think I’ve addressed it on other threads.
@haimy Hashem created Adam as one male / female figure, and blessed them as Adam. Then He separated them.The gemara learns from this that man is not called Adam and is incomplete until he is joined with his other half, woman.
Yes we have different roles which have different qualities and which are superior in some ways and inferior in others. But one is not inherently better than the other.
Aizer knegdo does not imply that she is beneath man inherently. If anything Knegdo implies she is there to keep him in check and together they reach balance.
CSParticipantTo conclude
@slominer posts like @jnn above create context and are not distortions.Posts like “only a man can reach the level of malach” on a thread that is about a Brocha, not about malachim, are, in my opinion a manipulation of sources and distortion of Torah hashkafa as it doesn’t provide the why, or the corresponding quality in women which makes her unsuitable to reach the level of malach (escape the world), but better suited than men to make the physical world G-dly.
CSParticipantOy. Ladies I hope you are not offended. Anyone making denigrating belittling comments about women is simply using distortions of different mekoros and missing out on the core understanding of Torah hashkafa that learning pnimius HaTorah, as the Zohar terms it, the neshama of Torah, would provide.
It also seems that these mens wives have also possibly missed out on their education, because when a woman is educated with full hashkafa, not just be a good girl so the neighbours won’t chatter, she will clearly be the Rochel of her home, whose men clearly recognise that my Torah and your Torah belong to her. Women have always upheld the Yiddishkeit of the Jewish nation by encouraging their husbands to grow and imbuing their children with core values since they raised the Tzivos Hashem way back in Mitzrayim.
I could respond point by point or with fuller explanation but I think I already have on numerous threads so don’t see a point of repeating the same things unless someone has a specific point they want addressed. Feel free to link to the posts I have already written on men and women hashkafa wise on other threads.
August 23, 2018 3:35 pm at 3:35 pm in reply to: Answering “what type of guy are you looking for” in shidduchim? #1579410CSParticipantCont.
Some time after I was married, I was wondering if this previously held conviction of mine by dating is a real Torah approach as it seems allot of the old fashioned shtetlach may have had these kind of marriages (complete with the nagging wife and abusive if am haaretz or porush type of Talmid chacham), and I was wondering if that was just an unfortunate symptom of harder times, or if only desiring a spouse you actually connect to is a symbol of non Jewish love marriage of ideology creeping into our world. So the following story cleared this up for me.
August 23, 2018 3:34 pm at 3:34 pm in reply to: Answering “what type of guy are you looking for” in shidduchim? #1579412CSParticipantThere was a young woman of handicapped parents, who had had becone frum, who had dated a young man but was unsure if he was the one for her. So she made an appointment with the Rebbe to ask his opinion. The Rebbe asked her, “Do you like him?”
She gulped and replied that she had basic ahavas yisrael for him. The Rebbe smiled broadly and replied, “Far a mahn darf men hoben mer vi stam ahavas yisrael…”
That settled it for her and that settled it for me 🙂
Good luck with shidduchim!!
August 23, 2018 3:33 pm at 3:33 pm in reply to: Answering “what type of guy are you looking for” in shidduchim? #1579420CSParticipant@discoverhashem
So sorry to hear that. Now that you are married, do you want tips for a happier marriage from those of us with happy marriages? Or were you just warning the op but have it covered with yourself?August 23, 2018 2:45 pm at 2:45 pm in reply to: Answering “what type of guy are you looking for” in shidduchim? #1579408CSParticipantBased on my experience, it is important that the checklist should match with your level of yiras shomayim and good middos BUT it is equally important that once you date, you ENJOY spending time with the person and look forward to their companionship.
One person I dated was a match for me hashkafa wise, and I could think of no good reason to turn it down hashkafa wise so I thought I will probably marry him. I told the news to a close friend of mine, without mentioning names and she looked at me and said so why do you sound resigned? I don’t think that’s how you’re supposed to approach getting engaged. Bh bh he turned me down after the next date, because it was only after that that I realized, no. I shouldn’t spend my life making it work with someone I don’t really enjoy. Better to be single than have a depressed marriage. (Now that I’m actually married and see older girls who aren’t and how hard it is I would probably change that to better to be single LONGER, than endure such a marriage, but the point is the same…)
August 19, 2018 6:01 pm at 6:01 pm in reply to: Different Circles Of Yidden Can Experience Great Unity – Achdus #1576578CSParticipant@dovidbt @knaidlach you’re most welcome. And hatzlocha in your holy work as well – were all here as Hashem’s shluchim to the planet. Ksiva Vachasima Toiva lshana toiva umesuka.
August 19, 2018 5:59 pm at 5:59 pm in reply to: Mochel Loch… time to forgive and be forgiven! #1576579CSParticipant@syag hi I remember you said I offended you but I’m still not clear how and why, just that it was somewhere on a 19 page thread. So if you are still offended, id like to sort it now that I’m not being bombarded by hundreds of messages. Please let me know how I offended you so I can clarify matters and apologise if necessary. Thanks 🙂
Ksiva Vachasima Toiva lshana toiva umesuka
August 9, 2018 3:29 pm at 3:29 pm in reply to: Different Circles Of Yidden Can Experience Great Unity – Achdus #1571593CSParticipant“Pirkey Avos says: Al Tischabeir L’Rosho! There is no such thing as achdus with people who deny the Ikkarim such as reform and conservative ‘rabbi’s’ etc. since they have removed themselves from klal Yisroel. Of course it is a Mitzvah to bring back the members of these comgregations to Judaism but their leaders are machti es horabim and off limits.”
Thought you may find it interesting to know the Rebbe made a clear distinction between the reform ‘Rabbi’ as a clergy member, and as a person.
The Rebbe simultaneously encouraged shluchim to mekarev then as individual yidden when they talk to them, or invite them over,because theyre Hashem’s child who deserves to be brought back.
However, simultaneously, we are never to give legitimacy to the false ideologies by sitting with them on a panel of clergymen, entering their temples etc.
August 7, 2018 7:12 pm at 7:12 pm in reply to: Different Circles Of Yidden Can Experience Great Unity – Achdus #1570502CSParticipantOne last story that really impressed me in this area is this: a Rabbi once wrote to the Rebbe and asked him if he could compromise on the mechitza, because his congregation really wasn’t going for it and they were threatening him that if he refused to compromise on mechitza, then they will just replace him with a conservative Rabbi, so he thought maybe it’s worth compromising to avoid a greater loss for them.
The Rebbe responded that if he compromises on the mechitza than he will be the Conservative Rabbi…
August 7, 2018 7:12 pm at 7:12 pm in reply to: Different Circles Of Yidden Can Experience Great Unity – Achdus #1570500CSParticipantAs to your second situation, the Rabbi would be unable to attend, and would convey that in a nice polite way. Would depend on the person to see where it goes from there, whether he takes it as accepted because the Rabbi is frum so it makes sense, or they get into a discussion about loving every Jew doesn’t mean condoning wrong philosophies.
And sometimes people will be upset but that’s life.
I remember a story of a lady whose husband had paid a major amount towards building the Chabad house and she walked in on shabbos and told the Rabbi that the mechitza was too high and he needs to lower it. He said he wouldn’t and she said her husband wouldn’t donate anymore and walked out in a huff.
The amazing thing about being a shliach is that although it’s really difficult building a donor base in the beginning and fundraising, at the end of the day, the Rabbi doesn’t need to answer to any board so he can stick to his principles with allot less pressure than someone who stands to be fired although he may lose donors.
August 7, 2018 4:46 pm at 4:46 pm in reply to: Different Circles Of Yidden Can Experience Great Unity – Achdus #1570497CSParticipantI don’t know every shliach – they each have to deal with each situation according to halacha and with tact- and they are trusted to do so on their own – there is no shliach manual that goes through every conceivable situation –
That being said, I know shluchim who for that reason don’t eat at anyone’s houses as a policy so they don’t get into sticky situations. Others will eat by mekuravim / completely frum ones, and in the case above, some will accept but make it very clear whats acceptable such as eating in Plastics, foods that would work like bagels and lox with acceptably hashgacha that are opened only after the Rabbi arrives
We invited an intermarried couple for Shabbos and they wanted to invite us back, but we explained the kashrus issues would be too complicated for a shabbos meal. They still wanted to host back so they ended up paying for a catered shabbos from a caterer I chose and they brought wine and pastries from a local acceptable bakery…
August 1, 2018 3:25 pm at 3:25 pm in reply to: Different Circles Of Yidden Can Experience Great Unity – Achdus #1568067CSParticipantAgreed
-
AuthorPosts