Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
i would most definitely be compatible with someone who has issues with goyish music, but not someone who would divorce someone else because of it. also fyi: i am also not compatible with anyone who conflates those two groups. so you’re out of luck sorry : (
if you haven’t even done undergrad, double my answer above. also, why would you be limited to as poor a choice as touro?
also, popa i’m surprised at your response – aren’t you on the Retake ED UVA wagon?
a) per my first ten second internet search, touro only has a DO school
b) per the next ten second search, it is unranked by usnwr
c) per the final ten seconds of intense thinking, the answer is no.
Edit: it apparently opened 5 years ago and costs 40k+. ABORT ABORT ABORT (no, that does not mean become an ob/gyn).
from a legal standpoint, there is nothing they can do. they may allege that they have an easement by prescription from the previous owner, but this is highly, highly unlikely (See: the last driveway post). if anything, just tell “a” that they encroach on your area and you want them gone. if they are paying him, he’ll tell them to be more careful. if they’re not, he’ll either get annoyed at them or tell them to stop for good. mumbling something about a lawyer may help your cause. if i understand you situation correctly, it doesn’t sound like the “other neighbor” has any standing to be upset, though it’s not like that has ever stopped anybody.
this is why having to interact with other humans is annoying.
lol would you people get your driveways under control. i’m going to have to start billing soon.
having heard some yeshivish people talking about their dates, i think many of them could benefit from watching a few episodes of “see dating.”
if you consider divorcing someone because they listen to secular music, you shouldn’t be marrying to begin with.
unless it’s ke$ha. then go ahead and break it off, no argument.
tbh, its hard to say without knowing the contours of this driveway. if they share it in some way, then as long as he didn’t park their during his neighbor’s time there is no adversity (and, incidentally, no notice either – they often go hand in hand). this is all baba basra stuff: if you have some kind of permission (an umon or aris) such that the owner doesnt have reason for alarm, you can’t adversely possess.
also, I think ny has some weird color of title laws. watch out.
popa you should know better. there’s no way it would be considered adverse if it’s shared.
reb d, please EXPLAIN your hero’s (purported) enigmatic and puzzling statement.
you idiot, either support your position or get out. stop being a passive-aggressive twit.
pba, I can’t tell if you’re serious. it’s not science because it takes too long to test? wut? so any evolution you “can see” is too obvious, and anything else is unprovable? lol nope.
“Why would you say that if you dont know if the Ibn Ezra said it or not?”
you answered your own question nicely.
sam2: do you believe that the world is legit 6k years old, or do you peddle the “long day” theory? or something else? genuinely curious, i haven’t given this issue much thought.
okay, ill take the bait: yes. it sounds like you want to argue, so go ahead.
“is there like any logic at all?”
yes. but it is not to be found here.
in before pba comes in and turns the tables on you with his rand shtick.
btw I hope this is nowhere because it’s false. a dud, if you will.
making like an ostrich isn’t how you deal with theories you disagree with. a btw denying evolution entirely is straight retarded. I challenge any one to defend it.
lol I still can’t figure out who shmuel and rivky are. father/daughter? shadchan/client? psychologist/patient? and where does reuven fit into the picture? abusive ex-husband just released from prison? OH THE SUSPENSE.
so apparently a bunch of 19 year old girls are better writers than at least one poster here…
josh, EXPLAIN your deep-sound but ultimately incorrect statement. examples plz.
strategic retreat dude. he’s being burned atm doe, true.
popa: pappy van winkle (a.k.a. nectar of the gods)
“I haven’t observed the alcohol abuse among groups such as Satmar that minimize contact with mainstream American culture – suggest the problem is one of kids having too much access to internet, television and movies.”
logic 101 fail bro.
hint: almost all of these “backdoor” continuing education programs by preftigious universities are just a way for them to make a quick buck off their name, and don’t actually lead to a job.
NOPE NOPE NOPE, no “closest pizza store number.” pretend restaurants are not a thing. your self-esteem, pocketbook, and future self and spouse will thank you for it.
oh, and hebrew.
I don’t want to hear any more “aypho ochel?”
I was just finishing the passphrase, I thought this was for british eyes only.
a scale. i’m not kidding. also common sense.
you mean like tinder, where each side okays the other in a double-blind manner? okay with me, I say that’s how all online dating should work (maybe req’d shadchan approval to join to make sure PUAs aren’t ruining it).
Hope you guess my name
But what’s puzzling you
Is the nature of my game
there, now I’m British too. may as well call it an invasion.
what? no, you can’t get cirrhosis from drinking one time too many or too much one time. it’s your brain (alcohol poisoning or asphyxiation from vomit) that will go first. liver takes years.
stay safe bros.
lol awesome name. it’s like a rabbi baked telling people to stop hittin the green.
all joking aside, I know a few Lakewood dudes with serious drinking issues. naturally, their parents won’t acknowledge the issue or send them to rehab because of shidduchim. ladies, this is what you’re getting. do your research.
keep it manageable my brothers.
and what I’m telling you is that 112 girls “okaying” 100 guys will have exactly the same outcome as 100 guys “okaying” 100 out of 112 girls. either way, it’s 100 guys dating 100 girls and 12 girls left in the cold. it is the number disparity (in this case, male scarcity) that determines number of dates, not who gets to take the first slice.
yeah it was a middling example because a team can draft more than one player, but a player can’t really draft more than one team. whatever, as long as people get the picture and stop with the “picking first” theory.
who gets to choose first is irrelevant – only number matter. it’s hard to think of an easy to understand example because very few relationships are bilateral and resource-limited in the same way as monogamous marriage. maybe think about it in terms of baseball players and teams: it doesn’t really matter who drafts who if you think about it. the current draft setup is a function of the disparity in number of players and teams, but if the quantities were to be reversed one could easily picture a world in which a players chose his team(s).
i have already debunked the “who gets to say yes first” myth.
try again.
i like the meal idea though. that should be a thing.
do you want to job afterwards? if yes, tcr is neither.
fyi the bill cosby one above is a hoax
as is any email that end with “if you don’t forward this”…
smh…
here’s a statistic:
12. the average dress size of girls coming back from seminary.
it can work as bro or brew. nice.
hint: this is the new normal. if you don’t mind me asking, what is your level of education? what kind of position are you seeking?
“when a lot of people there are those that aren’t your friends or your Chassan’s friends and you have no idea who you are.”
wait, was she high?
whoa whoa whoa….what?
and already they have a politcial writer
classic ywn
master troll poasts
derp tries to pile on, fails
a wild brain masterman appears!
something613 asks questions
someone makes random and likely false assertions
ywn, never change.
i’m on board with the creepy guy thing, but with more of a socially retarded bent. and fyi, mathematically it should make no difference who gets to say yes or no first. it’s far more likely that it’s an effect of number disparity, not a cause in and of itself.