Avram in MD

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,301 through 2,350 (of 2,517 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Be aware of stalkers/info stealers #827591
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    BTGuy,

    A thread topic could be about how grow vegetables indoors during the winter. People would make interesting suggestions about what grows better, and I can read with interest. Then I will see the Jothar post and it has nothing to do with vegetables. You know what the subject would be. lol

    Can you provide me an example or two of where Jothar did this? I think your contention is exaggerated. There is way more disruption in the other threads from Jothar’s detractors.

    in reply to: Who are you? Who am I? #828429
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    chocandpatience_,

    The CR is no longer the cosy, friendly place I discovered 18 months ago. That’s a shame.

    I’m not sure if we have been reading the same CR. I have been reading posts here for several years, and there have always been mean spirited, flaming posts and threads with personal attacks, as well as warm, nice threads. I have seen a thread dedicated to banning posters based on their viewpoints (naming names), and instances of harassment against single posters. Why do debates on this one issue suddenly change the tone of the CR for you?

    I once posted in another place I found through interactions on the CR, and very quickly a “troll” poster tried to reveal who I was (but s/he was completely off the mark) and asked me to send him/her an e-mail. Many threads here have a “weird” feel to them, with attempts to pry information out of other users. There has also been a lot of sock puppetry, not just from Joseph. I have kept a lower profile because of all of this, and even regret what small amount of personal information I did reveal.

    All that said, I agree that witch-hunts are not the way to go. Randomly attacking other posters with accusations of stalking not only disrupts the CR, but it weakens the valid case for greater caution. My feeling for this is to encourage safer posting, and let the moderators do the rest. If a poster has a concern with something going on, it should be e-mailed to the moderators rather than spread on the thread. Most of this should occur behind the scenes. It’s interesting to me, however, that the opponents of greater caution are primarily the ones keeping the discussion going…

    in reply to: Be aware of stalkers/info stealers #827569
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Am I the only one who’s starting to think that the whole “fight” between Jothar and BTGuy and their teams of allies itself sounds strangely artificial?

    in reply to: Be aware of stalkers/info stealers #827510
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    HaLeiVi,

    I agree that the scenario I described is not a likely vector to obtain someone’s identity (but not an impossible one). I was working with the object lesson that YW Moderator-42 set up.

    Would you agree, however, that there are more likely scenarios where CR users can ascertain the identities of other posters? It has happened several times, such as when cantoresq’s niece figured out who he was (which was benign), or when mosherose allegedly harassed WolfishMusings in real life, because he gave very specific details about a shiur he was attending (certainly not benign).

    I am not promoting or agreeing with hysterical suggestions to sacrifice the free flow of posts in the CR on the altar of security such as verified screennames or the like, but I strongly agree with the words of caution, which weren’t excessive. I was also surprised by the posters who objected to even that (claiming it disrupted the flow of threads).

    in reply to: wrong to be a sports fan? #828664
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    I don’t think there is anything wrong with rooting for a sports team, though with several caveats:

    1.) Proper context and perspective must be maintained. Many sports fans feel jubilant after their team wins, and depressed after their team loses. Some people feel real hatred towards their team’s rivals, or the rival team’s fans. I think all of this is wrong; it’s just a game, and should be seen as such.

    2.) I think a person should root for their team, but not wrap their identity up into the team. This goes for other things too, such as career, school, etc.

    3.) Watching a game on television or attending a game can be problematic, due to exposure to pritzus or coarse behavior. This might be a problem with some sports (football) more than others (baseball?).

    I personally do follow several teams, but I don’t watch games on television (don’t even have cable/antenna television). I read the recaps and analyses, and sometimes watch the highlights online.

    in reply to: Unix programming? #826548
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    I have liked bash shell.

    I have had some problems with CSH… for example, you can’t redirect STDERR to files or /dev/null in the way you can with Bourne-type shells like bash.

    in reply to: :::::::::::::::NERD::::::::::::::::: #920580
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Don’t accept the label. Only you can say what you are. If you don’t want to be a nerd, then you are not a nerd!

    in reply to: Be aware of stalkers/info stealers #827494
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    moi aussi,

    If I say I’m related to Rockefeller, or the Sultan of Brunei or lehavdil the Belzer Rebbe, have I caused any DANGER????

    I think YW Moderator-42 is attempting to demonstrate the danger. Consider the following sequence of events:

    1.) Poster “YoungPerson” mentions that she is from prominent family X.

    2.) Poster “OlderMan” contacts someone in family X, stating that he is involved with IT security, and that someone in the CR is claiming to be from family X, which concerns him, and to confirm that YoungPerson is legit.

    3.) Family X investigates and finds out that a young niece is posting in the CR, so they contact OlderMan to let him know who YoungPerson is, and that she’s legit. They thank OlderMan for his concern for the family’s privacy.

    4.) OlderMan now has YoungPerson’s full name, and can easily deduce other details such as address, age, school, etc.

    in reply to: Be aware of stalkers/info stealers #827491
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    It seems possible to me that YW Moderator-42 is using an object lesson to make a point to am yisrael chai, that revealing personal information in the CR (e.g., that am yisrael chai is a Kletzky) can lead to real life ramifications (having the Kletzky family contacted regarding the CR posts).

    That’s all I think this is; after all, if AYC’s account was really locked, YW Moderator-42 would probably have noted such in his/her screenname subtitle, as is commonly done when other posters have their accounts locked.

    in reply to: Let Our People Have Fun #824136
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    BTGuy,

    Despite the fact that I really like fish, I am not Jothar. I just happen to agree with one point he has been making: that users on this site should be more careful with personal details, and moderators should be on the lookout for suspicious behavior. Nothing more than that. I have no other intentions.

    in reply to: Let Our People Have Fun #824122
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    ZeesKite,

    Please, let it rest. You are generating much more disruption with this issue than Jothar is.

    As far as a phone-call verified screen name, I personally don’t think that it would be feasible. In general, security and usability are inversely proportional, so a proper balance needs to be attained. Also, I feel that providing personal information such as a phone number to a Web site is in itself a security threat for the user.

    I think the best path for greater security lies in the existing features of the CR: the posters and moderators. Posters should guard their personal information more closely, and moderators should be on the lookout to edit/delete posts that may compromise someone’s personal information, especially if the poster is young.

    in reply to: Be aware of stalkers/info stealers #827446
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    ZeesKite,

    Why are you so bothered by Jothar bringing up very real online privacy issues? You have been calling him out unprovoked in several threads.

    I don’t know anything about the law enforcement issues Jothar and the moderators are alluding to, so I am not commenting about that.

    in reply to: Be aware of stalkers/info stealers #827422
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    BTGuy,

    You are sloppily creating loshon hora and dan lekaf zcheus issues for all of us by not handling your suspicions behind the scenes with email warnings or waiting for a real problem.

    From what I’ve seen, Jothar has been making a case for better protection of users’ identities by pointing out threads that might be problematic, not posters, and making general recommendations to not share PII or other seemingly innocent information that can be combined to make PII. I read more than I post, and I have seen several instances in the CR where a poster attempts (or threatens/claims to attempt) to harm another poster “IRL” after the latter poster revealed enough information online to provide an identity. One example was an attempt by “mosherose” to have another poster thrown out of a shiur in real life (see http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/changed-topic-of-shiur-do-i-have-a-right-to-be-disappointed). I don’t think such behavior is ok, do you?

    in reply to: will katia follow irene? #806471
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Mod80,

    The features that will cause Katia to turn (a break in the subtropical ridge and a large trough over the eastern U.S.) are already in place. At this point the situation is similar to watching a cork floating in a stream, and noticing a change in the current downstream. Of course the currents can change, but it is highly unlikely.

    Don’t forget that there is a vigorous tropical disturbance to Katia’s southeast, about midway between the western coast of Africa and the lesser Antilles. There’s a good chance that it will become TS Maria soon.

    Another interesting tidbit: the name Katia is the replacement for the now retired Katrina.

    in reply to: Davening for a Presidential Candidate #885732
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    kol daveed,

    Thanks for your response. I agree with all three of your points.

    in reply to: Davening for a Presidential Candidate #885727
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Stamper (or Hacham),

    daven for a sport team to win? I sincerely hope you are kidding.

    Just to get clarification of your position(s), which would you say is worse… davening for a sports team to win, or not davening at all?

    I do understand that some things a person may daven for are foolish, but is it assur for a fool to daven?

    in reply to: Missionaries #794750
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    If a missionary comes to the door, do not accept any of their materials, even if you think it would get them to go away faster, and even if you intend to throw it out right away. No matter how “resistant” you appear to their proselytizing, the missionary will mark your address down for a “follow-up” visit if you accept their materials.

    in reply to: Tipping when the service is terrible. (or not there at all) #792698
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    A few points that come to my mind:

    1.) It is likely that many common restaurant inconveniences are not the fault of the server. Food coming late to the table or meals arriving at different times may reflect a kitchen issue rather than a server issue. Even mistakes in the order may be a kitchen issue. Unless the server did something obviously wrong (e.g., rudeness, inattention), I wouldn’t punish him/her for a problem that may well have been out of their control.

    2.) A restaurant inconvenience may be a good opportunity to exercise our ability to have hakaras hatov and dan l’kaf zechus; isn’t that worth a few dollars?

    3.) A polite word with the server may completely resolve the issue while avoiding the sting and loss of withholding the tip.

    4.) I think stronger action (withholding a tip, complaining to the manager, etc.) should only be considered if I felt the problem was significant enough that I didn’t want to return to the restaurant in the future. Since I’ve moved into my present community which has numerous restaurants, that threshold for me has been met only once, and the restaurant closed very shortly after the incident, before I even had the chance to contact the manager.

    in reply to: Goodbye to the Coffee Room #789751
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    “Victory for the Sun”… that names sounds Xian to me, as did a lot of the terminology Basket of Radishes used.

    in reply to: Tzitzits in the summer time #789921
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    basket of radishes,

    I’ve observed from your comments here, including the fact that you wear tzitzis “out” but not in the house, and denigrating those who tuck them in (which I don’t, by the way), that you view the tzitzis as a sign for others of your Jewishness. When giving the mitzvah of tzitzis, however, the Torah says ?????????? ????? – and you will look upon them. The reality is that the tzitzis we wear are not for others to see and recognize that we are Jewish, but rather to remind us constantly that we are Jewish and have an obligation to fulfill Hashem’s mitzvos. In that respect, I can’t think of a more important place to wear tzitzis than when at home.

    Also, speaking as a person who also became frum in a tiny town with a rav and his family being the only other frum Jews around, I cannot adequately express how different it is to live in a community with other frum Jews. Being frum alone is like lighting a candle in a dark forest. Being in a supportive community is like joining thousands of candles together into a great torch that is so much brighter. Please try to understand that before you knock your fellow Jews for “conforming” in their communities.

    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Feif Un,

    Out of curiosity (I’m intending to ask, not challenge), what does/would the Rav say regarding the maris ayin of putting items into a turned-on oven on Shabbos, thus giving the appearance of baking on Shabbos? I remember learning that a big part of the reason for having a blech, for example, is so your action does not appear to be cooking. I can understand that, by taking things out of the oven by hand, it is obvious that they are not above yad soledes bo, but what about putting them in?

    in reply to: Wearing a Yarmulka in a Movie Theater #787683
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    basket of radishes,

    I follow Jewish law that makes sense

    Refraining from eating pork makes no sense to the human intellect, so would you throw that out?

    Do you honestly think that you can sit in judgement of our Torah and decide for yourself what makes sense and what doesn’t?

    You claim to be far from “reform”, but your ideology 100% fits the bill, or perhaps you are a Karaite?

    in reply to: Wearing a Yarmulka in a Movie Theater #787652
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Wow, this debate is surprisingly cantankerous.

    Droid,

    Can someone please explain why Rav Moshe Feinstein zt’l in Vol. 2 Siman 95 of Orech Chaim in Igros Moshe says its worse to take off a yarmulka when going into a movie theater than to c’v go into a movie theater with a yamulka?

    When a Jew wears a yarmulke into a place where he should not be, he begins to feel very uncomfortable. At that point, he can do one of two things: remove the yarmulke, or realize that if he’s uncomfortable wearing a yarmulke in that place, then perhaps he shouldn’t be there and leave. My guess is that Rav Moshe ZT”L preferred the second choice.

    A yarmulke is like a megaphone for the neshama, it’s an amazing thing.

    Hopefully I’m not wading into dangerous waters when I say this, but the MPAA ratings system is not really in “sync” with Jewish values. A rated “G” movie, while considered innocent and suitable for children by the surrounding secular culture, often contains ideas and images that are antithetical to Torah concepts, such as children rebelling against parents, shallow mindsets, immodest dress and behavior, etc. I know there are some films out there that may be fine for many, but we cannot rely on the MPAA ratings to protect our values.

    in reply to: Changed Topic of Shiur – Do I Have A Right To Be Disappointed? #788265
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    I forgot to mention that the reason I agree that you shouldn’t say anything in the shiur case (unlike the free item case I imagined above) is because of the niceness of what the shul is doing.

    In other words, I feel that your disappointment is justified, but given that the shul is going out of its way to do something nice for the community, it’s a good thing that you cut them slack.

    in reply to: Changed Topic of Shiur – Do I Have A Right To Be Disappointed? #788264
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    I think you do have justification for feeling disappointed, though given the fact that the shiur was free as a public service, and the possibility that there may have been a miscommunication between the organizers and the presenter, I think you are also correct that you probably shouldn’t say anything.

    I feel that the reason you may question whether you have the right to feel disappointed comes because what the shul is doing, offering a free shiur to the whole community plus dinner, is a very nice, upright thing to do. That factor acts as an emotional counterweight to your disappointment.

    So here’s a parallel situation. Suppose I advertised in a paper that I wanted to give away a certain rare item for free . You have been interested in acquiring that very item for some time, so you make a long schlep over to my place to get the item (let’s assume you didn’t call to confirm, but somehow knew the item wasn’t taken yet). When you arrive, I say that I’ve changed my mind and want to keep the item, but here’s a different item for free that has the same monetary value. Would you feel disappointed? Would you have the right to? After all, your time was spent in getting there.

    In the above case, I wouldn’t think “damages” should be paid, but a statement of “I came a long way and unfortunately this wasn’t the item I was expecting” followed by an apology to you would seemingly be justified. After all, it was my advertisement that was responsible for bringing you out.

    in reply to: is glade or the like bad for you? #784584
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    The Goq,

    Yes the everglades can be very bad for you dont swim in them

    The Everglades are fine, it’s the gators, snakes, and leeches in the Everglades that’ll getcha. 🙂

    in reply to: Do I Have To Call Eclipse.. #781815
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    ZeesKite,

    For some reason, I think that most moderators shy away from undoing changes made by another moderator. For example, if one moderator rejects a post, it’s unlikely that another moderator will come and unreject it. There may, however, be a way around this in the case of your subtitle.

    Try posting to the request-a-subtitle thread from a while back, and specifically state what you want your subtitle to be. That way, the moderator won’t be “undoing” another moderator’s changes, but rather fulfilling the wishes of the user.

    in reply to: Who wants to be a Tzadaikes like Rus? #1180175
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    To all:

    As a side note, I read in the news that a Goy who is 51 just got married to a 16 y.o. girl. And Goyim have no Chiyuv to get married!

    And we want to base our decisions on what the goyim do why?

    in reply to: The Weather Thread #778840
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    minyan gal,

    Avram: Am I correct in assuming that you are a meteorologist?

    Yes. I am not a television weathercaster, however, nor do I work for a television or radio station.

    in reply to: Start Shemone Esrei Over or Go Back? #778772
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    We were actually learning this sugya in my gemara shiur recently.

    There is a difference between V’sein Bracha and Ya’aleh V’yavo, in that the former is said during the “middle” supplication portion of the Shemoneh Esrei, while the latter is said as part of the final three brachos (e.g., R’tzei through the end of the tefilla). Thus, for V’sein Bracha, you can make it up through Shomeah Tefilla, but afterwards you must repeat your tefilla. By Ya’aleh V’yavo, you can make it up as long as you have not finished your tefilla. If you finished, then you must repeat.

    The Gemara has a discussion clarifying what the end of the tefilla is. It could be at the end of the bracha of Shalom, when you take three steps back, or at the end of your personal supplications if you have a minhag to add them. A further discussion is made regarding supplications before the three steps vs. after the three steps. The last opinion stated holds that customary supplications made before the three steps back (e.g., Elokai n’tzor) are considered part of the tefilla, and thus you can go back to R’tzei and say Ya’aleh V’yavo if you remember during Elokai n’tzor, but once you take three steps back, you have to repeat your Shemoneh Esrei, even if you haven’t said Y’hi Ratzon (the supplication after the three steps) yet. We didn’t discuss this in the shiur, but I would imagine that the above wouldn’t apply to supplications that you don’t normally say, even if you said them before the three steps. I have a recollection that the Artscroll says to repeat if you’ve said Yih’yu L’ratzon (the final sentence of Elokai n’tzor), which would make sense given the above.

    One big exception to this is the Ya’aleh V’yavo of ma’ariv on Rosh Chodesh. Here, you don’t go back to R’zei, even if you remember in the very next bracha!

    I have not yet learned the answer to the second question (how late can you repeat if you remember later), but since your first tefilla did not “go up”, then I don’t see why you couldn’t say another Shemoneh Esrei if you still have time – as opposed to waiting until the following tefilla, since a tefillah bizmana is better than a “make up” tefilla. I’ll ask a question about it at my next shiur!

    in reply to: The Weather Thread #778835
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    One of the few jobs you could have that being wrong won’t cause you to lose your job. I wonder if managers even have to do annual performance appraisals

    Actually, any forecast can be quantitatively verified, so managers can indeed see who is skillful and who is not.

    The problem is, meteorologists issue probabilistic forecasts (50% chance of rain) that the public interprets as deterministic (it WILL rain), so when it doesn’t rain, the meteorologist is “wrong.” Better communication of forecast data to the public is a big concern of meteorologists.

    Given the Alabama tornadoes a while back as an example, meteorologists in Norman, OK, indicated a risk for a severe weather/tornado outbreak 5 days in advance. The day of the outbreak, they issued a “high risk” outlook for violent tornadoes, and issued “Particularly Dangerous Situation” tornado watches. When the tornadoes developed, I think there was an average of more than 20 minutes of warning before the storms arrived. I’d say that was a pretty good forecasting job.

    I’ll admit though, I am biased.

    in reply to: Why is corn on the cob not kosher??? #1021282
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Sweet corn (the type we boil or grill to eat as “corn on the cob”) I believe is a different variety than most of the stuff you see growing in the vast corn fields of the midwest (a big component of which is animal feed).

    in reply to: who do u think has 2 names in cr and wat r they? #780303
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    It doesn’t seem to me that real-brisker and Joseph have matching posting styles.

    gefen,

    why is it not honest to have more than one screen name? this is all supposed to be anonymous anyway. so what’s the diff?

    A user with multiple screennames can hijack forums – giving the impression that the “masses” hold one view, for example, or attacking an opposing viewpoint through use of a straw man sockpuppet (e.g., creating a username that “holds” the opposing viewpoint but makes stupid, irrational, or hateful comments and arguments, with the goal of stirring up animosity towards that viewpoint through guilt by association).

    This is (mostly) an anonymous forum with respect to the real world, but it is not anonymous within its own context – users tend to associate each screenname with a unique individual, so if someone uses multiple screennames, he dishonestly creates the impression that multiple people are posting.

    in reply to: The Weather Thread #778829
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    minyan gal,

    Well, I just checked the Weather Channel. There is a picture of the sun with raindrops beside it. So………..it will be sunny with a chance of rain OR rainy with a chance of sun.

    Precipitation forecasts are probabilistic due to uncertainty. Behind that sun with raindrops (understandably confusing – not the National Weather Service’s fault, though, rather the Weather Channel’s) is a forecast that might read something like:

    Today: Partly cloudy with a 40% chance of showers and thunderstorms, mainly after 3pm. High in the upper 80s.

    What this forecast means is that at any given location in the forecast area, there is a 4 in 10 chance of getting rain, and the possibility of this rain will start around 3pm. It’s not as satisfying as a simple yes or no to the “will it rain” question, but when dealing with summer time convective patterns, some areas will get rained on while others do not, so this is the best forecast possible.

    These forecasts can still be used for decision making. For example, I usually carry a small umbrella in my bag on weekdays. If the rain chances are 50% or more, I might consider bringing a larger umbrella that I have to carry by hand, or a poncho that takes up space in my bag. If the rain chances are 80% or above, perhaps I’d drive instead of walking, or reschedule outdoor plans, etc.

    I definitely recommend reading the text portion of the forecasts… you get much more information than from the cartoon sun and clouds.

    in reply to: Business travel #776494
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    From the OP:

    Do you try to find a Minyan or just daven alone?

    That would depend on both the trip’s required schedule of events and the availability/closeness of a minyan. For example, if I didn’t have a rental car and the closest minyan was driving distance only, I would most likely not fool with an unfamiliar public transit system to get there.

    Do you bring food or buy on the road? (even if there is no kosher restaurants you can always find plenty of Kosher food at a grocery store with the OU on it)…

    I’d map the location where I was staying before leaving to gain familiarity with the local grocery stores. I would also bring supplies.

    What happens if you have to go out to dinner with a client and there is no Kosher restaurants around?

    I would request to have the meeting location at the hotel/office. Fortunately in my work, we don’t have business lunches/dinners like that, and if I’m invited, I can politely refuse or change the locale per my organization’s protocols, so I’ve never had to ask a shaila.

    Shaking hands with the opposite sex in a business setting?

    I would avoid it.

    Note that these are my personal answers, not a directive for others.

    WolfishMusings:

    Joseph:

    Has maris ayin been repealed from our laws?

    Why? Did you really think that I was grilling George Foreman in the grill? Would anyone think that?

    It seems apparent to me from the context that Joseph was referring to entering a non-kosher restaurant, not using a portable grill to prepare kosher meat. So unless you were grilling some meat on your portable grill and then bringing it into a non-kosher restaurant to eat, I don’t think he was referring to you.

    in reply to: I See A Boat #967990
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    popa_bar_abba,

    This is not a contest.

    (Chew on that one)

    I.e., you are not contesting mewho’s answer?

    in reply to: Visiting Washington DC #766020
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    The Holocaust Museum Cafe is not kosher, but there are sealed kosher products (e.g., parve sandwiches, noodle salad) available in the cafe that were brought in from a kosher caterer. There are also things like sealed bags of chips (OU) on sale at the cafe. Make sure to check for the seal on the sandwich, as the cafe serves similar products that are NOT kosher. Many of the cafe staff are aware of the issues, and can help steer frum customers to the right stuff.

    Eli’s is a great meat restaurant in the District.

    The largest frum communities in the DC area are in Silver Spring, and there are a larger variety of shuls and kosher restaurants in Silver Spring and Rockville (to the west), some of which provide kosher sukkos.

    A good resource for any Jewish traveler to the DC area is the Washington Vaad’s (capitol k) Web site (just Google Washington Vaad and you’ll find it). They provide a list of all Vaad supervised establishments and a list of affiliated shuls.

    in reply to: men banned from girls graduations #769093
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    popa_bar_abba,

    Is this thread discussing whether we think men should be at high school girl’s graduations; or whether we should be making fun of and criticizing people who think one way or the other; or whether people who think one way or the other and run schools are bad people if they impose their view on the school they run?

    Yes:-)

    in reply to: men banned from girls graduations #769091
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    WolfishMusings,

    While I personally would disagree with the decision to restrict men from a graduation, assuming there were no performances or the like, and similarly I would disagree with “photoshopping” out pictures of modestly clad women in a newspaper, I think that it’s possible that you are working with a different definition of “improper thoughts” than those who are disagreeing with you.

    A question: suppose a large group of healthy, normal men were shown two pictures, one of an attractive woman, and one of a tree. Following this, they are polled on which picture they liked better. Or, better yet, film their eyes and record the length of time that they focused on each picture. Which picture do you think would “win”?

    Another question: why don’t advertisers put pictures of trees next to sports cars they are selling?

    These realities are part of being a normal man; however, as Jews, I think we should attempt to keep all of our focus solely on our wives, since that is where kedusha and appropriateness are found.

    in reply to: ???? on women. Not trolling this time. #766057
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Maybe I’m being hypersensitive, but your tone and style seems a little accusatory?

    You juxtapose my words as if there is some contradiction or new revelation from my later words. I thought it was clear that my first post was not a direct translated quote.

    I did not intend to accuse you of passing off your paraphrase as a literal translation, and I’m sorry that my tone came across as accusatory to you. I quoted the portion of your OP that I wished to discuss, and then I quoted your later words because they contained the best representation of what I objected to (I paraphrased…[but] take it up with him).

    In any event, I don’t have a ????, and it is really hard to find it on hebrew books, since they have a really old edition.

    Why don’t you put it up? It is in breishis.

    I’m in the same boat as you, probably more so since I’ve not heard of these comments, but since I’m not making the “disturbing” assertion, the burden of proof is luckily not on me:-)

    BTW, on a more accusatory note (ha ha)… what do you make of the pasuk in Parshas Emor which we just read last week, Vayikra 24:10, which makes a reference to an isha Yisraelis?

    in reply to: ???? on women. Not trolling this time. #766054
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    popa_bar_abba,

    He says that Hashem did not care as much when making chava, because she is just there to assist odom. That is why women have more health problems than men, and more day to day issues. (or month to month).

    This to me is the most disturbing one.

    And later you said:

    I’m just paraphrasing what he says. Take it up with him.

    A paraphrase is not a literal translation. It is a rewording done usually to explain another’s concept in one’s own terms. Are you sure you haven’t interjected your own interpretation of the Ralbag’s comments into your paraphrase? Perhaps you can post the actual text of the comments?

    Specifically, do you think that Ralbag meant to say that Hashem would create something “buggy”, G-d forbid, due to lack of care (i.e., attention to detail) in the “process”, which implies fallibility? Somehow I don’t think so, but that is what your paraphrase suggests. I would think that the Ralbag would agree that every aspect of Hashem’s creation was done purposefully.

    Healthy women in general experience more physical pain and weakness than equivalently healthy men due to their makeup. I don’t think anyone here would disagree with that statement. That this is related to a woman being a helper against Adam makes for an interesting discussion. I don’t see why misogyny needs to be injected into that discussion, however.

    in reply to: Computer Programmer #763819
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    WolfishMusings,

    Oy, so that’s why my wife said I didn’t understand her. Next time I’ll bring home 6 and all will be well:-)

    In reality, if we wrote the code literally per her request, the “get 6” would not act on a variable, so some interpretation is needed.

    in reply to: Computer Programmer #763815
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Clairvoyant,

    When I ran her request, I returned 7 cartons of milk:-)

    The pseudocode for her request:

    totalCartonsMilk = 1 # She asked to get 1 carton of milk separate from the if-statement.

    if(eggs) {

    totalCartonsMilk = totalCartonsMilk + 6

    }

    return totalCartonsMilk

    in reply to: Date Yawners #762931
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Did he show other signs of disinterest (distraction, no eye contact, short responses, etc.) or was it just the yawning that was “off”?

    I have asthma, which worsens in the springtime, and one of my prodromal symptoms is excessive yawning/sighing as I work harder to get enough air. Yawning from shortness of breath can also be a symptom of anxiety.

    in reply to: Chometz on motzei pesach!!!! #761982
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    I’ll be bringing matza pizza to the office on a semi-frequent basis until the matza runs out (some time before Shavuos, likely earlier this year). I have enjoyed some kitniyos today, however.

    in reply to: Mishing on Pesach #1144865
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Sounds like a minhag that can spare some hurt feelings. Prevents the situation of Reuven Lo-Gebrokts turning down an invite from Shimon Gebrokts, but accepting an invite from Levi Kol-haChumros, hurting Reuven’s feelings in the process.

    We personally do invite and get invited for Pesach meals. If we feel that questions need to be asked, we ask them openly.

    in reply to: Yeah, It's A Rant… Talking In Shul and Attitudes… #761762
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    However, sometimes that is how I am made to feel.

    By whom? Posters in this forum? People in the real world? I know none of us has a full picture of your experience, but it seems from your writing that a lot of the “my way or the highway” attitudes that appear to trouble you so much originate from teenagers or teenagers-at-heart. From dealings with teenagers in the present day to high-school experiences you’ve had. I never had the opportunity to attend a Yeshiva for high school; my only experience is with a public school. It seems, however, that there are unfortunately some common attitudes between both environments. For example, in a public school setting, one who does not wish to be ostracized must follow the clothing and other “minhagim” of the “in crowd.” B”H in the Yeshivos decent clothing and lofty pursuits are what’s considered “cool”, but despite that I do feel that the “in crowd” vs. “out crowd” attitude must go.

    When my family and I first moved into our community, we met some extremely warm and friendly people. We also had some unfortunate experiences, rudeness, standoffishness, etc. The latter was extremely scary to us at first, since we were still relatively new to the “religious scene”, but we talked extensively with our Rav and let him guide us. We have B”H made some dear friends from the warm and friendly group, and we stay out of the way of the rudeness (and I believe that if they truly knew the effects of their words or actions on us, they would have acted differently). If we encounter a situation where someone tells us, “don’t you know that you should X”, or “I think the Y you are doing is wrong”, we thank them for the information and then take it to our Rav if needed and ask him what we should do.

    Ultimately I have learned that most people are more concerned with what I or others think of them than vice versa.

    I do have emotions and sometimes act very strongly on them, even if the end result is not completely logical. Consider it a failing on my part.

    I don’t think emotions are a failing. Neither is all illogical behavior necessarily a failing. It was just saddening to me to sense that you felt hurt by a Yeshivish person or persons, and were coming to YWN to try and get others to heap more coals onto yourself.

    No one has said that here, so obviously I cannot trot that out.

    I was referencing a previous thread about loud and out-of-sync davening. In retrospect, I probably should not have brought that into this discussion.

    It’s not that. Heck, the shul that I daven in when there is laining is a largely yeshivish-style shul with no talking… and I have never once ranted against it. On the contrary, it’s a warm welcoming atmosphere where people respect each others’ davening, do not talk or disturb and where I can actually hear the chazzan when he speaks.

    That’s amazing that you have found a shul like that. I wonder if it would be worth it to trade in stress for footsteps and go to that shul for all of your davening on Shabbos?

    Or perhaps get an associate membership at the other shul so you feel more empowered to say something about the atmosphere?

    In other words, it’s not the fact that it’s yeshivish style… it’s the fact that they talk during davening. Had they been a chassidish shteeble, a Young Israel, an MO shul or anything else, I’d be just as bothered.

    I apologize for mis-reading you. I interpreted your analysis of the attitude in that shul to be based on this portion of your opening salvo:

    I know that you […] wear proper hats and jackets during davening and could easily quote gemarahs, rishonim and achronim that I’ve never heard of.

    in reply to: The Sefiras Ha'Omar game!! #948946
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    When we’re talking about a typical major or minor scale, the octave falls by the 8th note of the scale.

    E.g., a C-major scale consists of:

    C D E F G A B C(one octave above your starting C)

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Now, if we’re doing a whole tone scale, there’s only 7. If a half tone scale, 13.

    in reply to: Aggressive Kiruv #761861
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    observanteen,

    Speaking only from my personal experience as a BT, my neshama was pulling at me since I was a kid; however, misconceptions about Orthodoxy and Orthodox Jews was a huge barrier. I literally feared Orthodox Jews – I thought they looked down on me, considered me inferior, and wanted nothing to do with me.

    It was a combination of finding resources and learning (finding authentically frum books is difficult if you are not frum! Non-frum sources have a lot printed on frumkeit, unfortunately) and small religious interactions with Orthodox Jews, culminating with approaching an Orthodox rabbi, that helped chip away the barrier for me.

    So I agree with you, perhaps non-frum Jews don’t need a lecture, they don’t need to be told that they are losing their chelek in Olam Haba because they do X (when they honestly don’t know of X, even if told). What they need is a smile, a hand to guide them through a mitzvah and a hearty “Amein” to show them that the mitzvah meant something to Hashem and to Orthodox Jewry.

    in reply to: Yeah, It's A Rant… Talking In Shul and Attitudes… #761754
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    WolfishMusings,

    Please forgive me this rant on your rant…

    Do you HONESTLY believe that there is an obscure heter for talking about mundane subjects during davening? Yes or no?

    I don’t think you do, otherwise, you would not have titled this thread a rant. Please answer, but I’m guessing you’re not going to bother responding to this post.

    Almost everyone here could see the point you were trying to make, and it was a good point, but then you branched off into the absurd.

    I have tried to make sense of your polemical style, which follows a pattern of:

    1.) I am bothered by [insert a clearly halachically wrong behavior] that is done by people who are makpid on the external Yeshivish customs (e.g., hat and jacket).

    2.) I am not makpid on those same external Yeshivish customs.

    Left here, it is a fairly strong attack against hypocrisy. Those same people who would never come to davening without a hat and jacket because it would be “wrong” (not adhering to a custom) then talk in shul (an outright aveira). Touchee! But then you invariably continue:

    3.) Since those who wear a hat and jacket are superior to me because I don’t wear a hat and jacket, then [insert a clearly halachically wrong behavior] must be somehow correct and I am too unlearned to see how.

    OK, a somewhat strange thing to say, but it still fits into your attack on hypocrisy if taken as dripping with sarcasm. Touchee again! However the switch to the “twilight zone” occurs:

    4.) Drop points 1 and 2 and argue that you are completely and honestly serious about point 3.

    Why do you do this? You as well as the rest of us know what the gedolim say about talking in shul (if you didn’t, which I doubt, an example from the S”A was posted above), so your contention that you honestly believe there is actually a heter for talking in shul collapses like a house of cards. So I am left with the question: why do you want me, a reader, to accept your point 4?

    I’m beginning to suspect that you’re hoping someone not paying close enough attention falls into the logical snare you have set, and asks or tells you something along the lines of: if you really believe that these men have some sort of heter for talking in shul, then perhaps you should not be bothered by the talking? That statement is the logical endgame of this absurd line of thinking, but it is fundamentally wrong because the premise is wrong.

    Then three months from now, when someone else posts a rant against talking in shul, you can triumphantly trot out: I posted the same thing three months ago, and was told that I was wrong and to stop being bothered by it!

    I am sorry that you have had so much trouble at this Yeshivish-style shul. I really, honestly believe that some of the “stuff” you are encountering there is not representative of the entire Yeshivish world. I also don’t feel that the Yeshivish world is “out to get you” despite what you may or may not believe. If it was, you wouldn’t have to lay such elaborate traps to get the condemnation that you seek as proof. On the contrary, you seem well liked in this forum. I enjoy most of your posts, which is why I think I get so bothered by threads like this one.

    All the best!

Viewing 50 posts - 2,301 through 2,350 (of 2,517 total)