Avram in MD

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 2,517 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The world is in a state of Geula- and don’t misunderstand us! #1640633
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    username123321,

    “Saying that we’re Kofrim over this [davening late] is another. And getting insulted when we argue back is surprising.”

    I don’t think I’ve seem or heard anyone assert that Chabad chassidim are kofrim due to zmanim. Certainly not me. That’s a straw man. The concerns are about the perceived deification of the Lubavitcher Rebbe ZT”L and changing the definition of Moshiach to fit him. And the idea that all Jews must accept these precepts or they are spiritually inferior.

    in reply to: Applesauce on latkes is better than sour cream: Prove me wrong. #1635752
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    What’s a meme?

    in reply to: The world is in a state of Geula- and don’t misunderstand us! #1634522
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    username123321,

    “The Heicha Kedusha by Mincha.”

    Watch out for the pot calling the kettle black. The only time I have ever witnessed a “heicha kedusha” davening within the Orthodox sphere was at a Chabad house for shacharis. And I’ve been to Chabad events where a minyan was present, and yet the rabbi refused to set up a mincha minyan, even though it was a small town and there certainly wasn’t any other mincha minyans available. Even the chol hamoed mincha at the zoo by the elephants I went to once had a full chazaras hashas.

    in reply to: The world is in a state of Geula- and don’t misunderstand us! #1634520
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    username123321,

    “It’s a shocker. I know. Lubavitchers believe that their Derech is more true than the other ones.”

    I don’t think anyone has a problem with that. The problem arises when people perceive that they are being missionized. Because, another shocker, I know, Litvish, Satmer, Sefardim, etc. also believe that their own derachim are more true than the other ones. And yet, you’ll argue with them over it as you noted above. Don’t get all offended when they argue back.

    in reply to: Lev Tahor and other frum cults- and don’t misunderstand me #1628348
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Milhouse,

    “Not from any one incident, but over time they could have realized that something is very wrong.”

    Agreed. Should those within the Chabad community be realizing that something is very wrong when the Lubavitcher Rebbe ZT”L is being increasingly deified?

    in reply to: The world is in a state of Geula- and don’t misunderstand us! #1628306
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    5ish,

    “Why do you all constantly feed trolls and think that people saying crazy things for the purposes of riling others up are suddenly going to write sources and have a nice conversation?”

    Poe’s Law.

    in reply to: The world is in a state of Geula- and don’t misunderstand us! #1626776
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    TomimTihyeh,

    “Careful – you dont want the snags to know that the Frierdiker Rebbe revealed to us that they think this way! Lol”

    You like telling it like it is, “lol”? Fine, I’ll tell it like it is. Better to be snags than ovdei avoda zara. We hope for the coming of melech hamoshiach every day, but we do not hope for a replacement of Hashem, R”L. Yes, I know it is much easier to have a relationship with a man – someone you can see, someone who smiles at you. It is scary to try and relate with a Creator Who is infinite and beyond our limited senses and perceptions, but that is what Hashem asks of us. That is what Avraham Avinu did. That is what Moshe Rabbeinu did, and exhorted us to do. You hold that the Rambam is the final word on Moshiach. Fine. Did the Lubavitcher Rebbe ZT”L build the beis hamikdash? Are we all living in Eretz Yisroel? Is he sitting on the throne of Dovid Hamelech in Yerushalayim? Was the korban tamid offered this morning? No. Therefore, the moshiach has not yet come, and you cannot redefine what the moshiach is to get around that, changing him into some sort of deity. The Christians already tried that 2000 years ago, so you’re late to the party.

    You’re getting so bent out of shape over perceived disrespect of your rebbe. But unlike you, who has used nivul peh CV”S to refer to Rav Kotler ZT”L and other precious and holy Torah leaders, nobody here has insulted the Lubavitcher Rebbe, ZT”L. We’re just not accepting him as the moshiach, based on the very clear criteria of the Rambam, and you seem to interpret that as disrespect. Well, guess what? You are disrespecting the Lubavitcher Rebbe, ZT”L much more than anyone else here, because he is certainly not getting nachas in shamayim when a supposed chassid of his makes him into a god, R”L.

    There is only ONE G-D, and that is Hashem. And He is not a man.

    Slight edit

    in reply to: My erev Rosh Chodesh minhag #1625310
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    knaidlach,

    A rav once saw a shochet on Shabbos during davening, and when saying POSE’ACH ES YADECHA…he didn’t move his right hand towards his left arm out of habit to touch the tefilin shel yad. The rav fired the shochet. because he only wanted shochtim in his community who wore tefillin during the week.

    in reply to: My erev Rosh Chodesh minhag #1622182
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah,

    “Just seems like the imagery of paying off the “debt collector” at very short-term intervals is like something out of the GodFather where he offers “a deal you cannot refuse” along with a Tony Soprano chassid showing up at your doorstep to demand payment.”

    Uhh no. Paying off debt in small intervals is the normal and preferred way to do things. It’s best to tackle things head on as soon as possible rather than waiting for them to become a bigger deal, or worse, you forget entirely about them.

    “The implication is more goiyeshe where the assumption is you will be a regular sinner and have a regularly scheduled “confession” except is comes on erur rosh chodesh rather than Sunday AM”

    Your problem is with Chazal, who told us to say “s’lach lanu Avinu ki chatanu” three times a day.

    in reply to: My erev Rosh Chodesh minhag #1622166
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah,

    “At that point he barks twice and starts chasing his tail..”

    Why is your golden retriever in shul?

    in reply to: My erev Rosh Chodesh minhag #1622167
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    laskern,

    “They would bring on Simchas Torah to the baal tefila for halel in place of lulav and esrog a potato and a corn stalk”

    By “corn” do you mean maize? Or just a stalk of a general cereal grass like wheat, barley, or rye?

    in reply to: My erev Rosh Chodesh minhag #1622168
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    lowerourtuition11210,
    “I do not know anyone who considers forgetting yaaleh veyavo a “zechus” +are you repeating shemoneh esrya with better kavanah, BasicLLY YOU re telling everone tht you forget that at minchah on erev rosh chodesh that tahnuun is not sai as I stated above a minhG SHTUS…

    LASKERn nO REASON TO DEFEND THIS “MINHAG” AN IDIOSYNCRASY DOES NOT MAKE A MINHAG.”

    I’m not insulting your minhag to capitalize in weird places, so don’t insult my minhag to forget that it’s erev Rosh Chodesh and sit for tachanun until the shaliach tzibbur starts kaddish and I stand back up.

    in reply to: My erev Rosh Chodesh minhag #1622170
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Meno,

    “Gosh, some people, I tell ya

    The last time I rode in a train with you, it got struck by lightning twice. So maybe adopting my minhagim might not be such a bad idea.

    in reply to: Spanking kids #1622143
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    klugeryid,

    “Spanking is physical abuse
    Yelling is verbal abuse
    Time out is emotional abuse
    IGNORING YOUR KID’S WRONGDOINGS IS SOCIETAL ABUSE”

    Is there really nothing in between spanking and yelling and ignoring a kid’s wrongdoing?

    in reply to: Spanking kids #1622139
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    coffee addict,

    “Are you saying that the gaonim tannaim and amaroaim who spanked their kids had their kids turn out violent?”

    There is a world of difference between “100 years ago” per your OP and the way chazal lived and did things. They are not interchangeable. Don’t look at the early 20th Century or the 1950s as some sort of gold standard.

    “I understand that there is a way it should be done, with love and respect but it’s not the spanking it’s the way it’s done”

    The problem is, there is almost nobody on this planet who will spank a child for the “right reasons” and in the “right way.” Spanking is almost always the last resort of impatience and frustration with a child, because it yields the “results” of submission and obedience quite effectively. The problem is, while the parent wins the short game, in the long run, submission and obedience aren’t the true results we seek. It’s proper chinuch that we want, and spanking is more often a short circuit than a shortcut to that end. A child spanked by a rageful or frustrated parent, or one embarrassed by his child’s behavior in public, will submit, will cry, and may even apologize for his behavior when that is demanded of him, but he won’t be feeling regret over his actions and a desire to do better. He will be feeling rage towards the parent, or his own humiliation and embarrassment over the spanking, not the behavior.

    in reply to: Interesting science #1620653
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Meno,

    “In less than one second? That would mean light is travelling faster than the speed of light in train man’s reference frame. That’s impossible.”

    No, on his watch it’ll be a second. On the platform man’s watch, it’ll be less than a second.

    “The discrepancy is not in when the light hits each observer’s eyes. Train man will see two lightning strikes simultaneously and platform man will see two lightning strikes simultaneously.

    The discrepancy is in when each observer sees the light hitting train man’s eyes. From train man’s reference point, the light beams from both strikes hit his eyes simultaneously (that’s why he observes the strikes as occurring simultaneously). From platform man’s reference point, the light beams from both strikes do not hit train man’s eyes simultaneously. In other words, platform man sees the strikes occur simultaneously, but he does not see them reaching train man’s eyes simultaneously.”

    The platform man observes the following: Two flashes that happened simultaneously at the moment the middle of the train (and the train man) passed him, by calculating that the light from each flash reached him exactly 1 second after the actual strike.

    The train man observes the following: Two flashes, with the flash at the front of the train happening just before he passed the platform man, and the flash at the back of the train happening just after he passed the platform man, by calculating that the light from each flash reached him exactly 1 second after the actual strike.

    The platform man observes the following about the train man: he was speeding towards one of the flashes at the same time the light from it was heading towards him, so the light reached him in under a second. He was moving away from the back flash, so that light reached him after slightly longer than a second.

    The train man observes the following about the platform man: he was speeding towards the back flash, which happened later than the front flash, so the light from the later back flash reached him at the same time as the light from the earlier front flash, which he was moving away from.

    in reply to: The world is in a state of Geula- and don’t misunderstand us! #1620641
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Chabadshlucha,

    “I remember the time in high school when we heard how that day’s story in Yeshiva was that a visiting Rebbe had asked a Lubavitcher bochur a question. The bochur reverently listened, and then registered shock, before he recovered and answered.

    The teacher was curious what had transpired, so he asked the bochur what had happened. The bochur said the Rebbe had asked him what the good tourist sights were. He hadn’t expected such a question from a Rebbe.”

    You forgot the end of the story. As the rebbe left, his attendant asked him, “why did you ask that bochur about tourist sites when you’re planning to spend the day in the beis medrash?” The rebbe replied, “nu, it’s a mitzva to love every Jew, so I talked to him about his own interests!”

    in reply to: My erev Rosh Chodesh minhag #1620427
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    lowerourtuition11210,

    “I believe that I would call this a minhag shtus……

    You must be one of those unfortunate people who lacks the zechus of repeating shemoneh esrei because you forgot yaalei v’yavo.

    “BTW do you do th same thing during chodesh nissan or on chol hamoed…..”

    I’m not a fanatic, if that’s what you’re asking. But sometimes I do it before a bris.

    in reply to: Interesting science #1620332
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Meno,

    “First let’s take a simple case: Light travels 186,282 miles per second. Let’s say I’m running in a straight line at 1000 miles per second, and lightning strikes exactly 186,282 miles ahead of me. How much time passes (on my watch) before I see the lightning? The answer, I believe, is exactly 1 second, because light travels the same speed in every reference frame – that’s Einstein’s chiddush.”

    Correct.

    “So now the train example. To make it simpler, lets say the train is 372,564 miles long (2 x 186,282 miles). The guy on the platform sees both lightning strikes simultaneously after 1 second – simple. But why doesn’t the guy on the train also see them simultaneously? Why is it different from my case? Is my conclusion in my case incorrect?”

    The flashes were 186,282 miles from each observer, so they both figure that the light from each flash took 1 second to reach them. But the observer on the platform saw the flashes as happening at the same time, and the one on the train saw the flash at the head of the train happen first. In the inertial frame of the platform observer, the man on the train was moving away from the light coming from the back flash and towards the light of the front flash, so the light from the front flash traveled less than 186,282 miles before reaching him, and the light from the back flash traveled further than 186,282. But to the man on the train, the light from each flash traveled exactly 186,282 miles before reaching him.

    in reply to: Interesting science #1620188
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Doing my best,

    Why? The light in front of him moved closer to him when the train moved towards it. (the same way when two cars go towards each other they meet other faster then when only one moves.) however, he is sort of running away from the photons behind him, so it will take them longer to hit him, however they are still there.”

    Why are the photons playing “catch-up” with the man on the train, and not the man on the platform? What’s special about the platform man that you take his side? Let’s dispense with the train and the platform, and say our two men are in spaceships whizzing past each other out in open space. And let’s say each man believed his spaceship to be at rest (“Full stop, ensign!” “Yes, captain!”). One man therefore thinks that he is “stopped”, and the other ship is moving past him, and the other thinks that his ship is “stopped”, and the other ship is moving past him! And suddenly there are two flashes of light nearby both ships. Both men think that his own ship is stopped, and the light from both flashes is moving towards each of the men at the speed of light. For one, the flashes were simultaneous, and for the other, they were not. Which is right? Both, relative to their own inertial frame of reference!

    in reply to: Interesting science #1618879
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Doing my best,

    “Yes, but the man on the platform will not see the strikes at the same time. This should prove that it is not only movement which can change your perception.”

    True, he wouldn’t, but he’d know that the strikes occurred at different distances from him, and, doing the math, he’d still calculate that the strikes occurred simultaneously. Setting up the thought experiment with the two strikes being equidistant from both observers is done for simplicity, but it doesn’t change the fact that in one man’s inertial frame of reference the strikes were simultaneous, and in the other man’s frame of reference they were not.

    Also, if the man on the train had super long hands and one was in front of the train and and the other in back, he would feel both strikes at the same time.

    No he wouldn’t. Let’s say his nerve signals could go from his hands to his brain at the speed of light, i.e., the signals are moving towards his brain at the same speed as the light from the flashes (in reality they go more than a million times slower). As we saw above, the light/nerve signal from the front of the train arrives to his brain before the light/nerve signal from the back of the train. So he both sees and feels the strikes as non-simultaneous. The truth is, they were non-simultaneous to him. Just as much as they were simultaneous to the guy on the platform.

    And even though he sees them at different times, that’s because of the fact that the back light hasn’t hit him, but it’s still there.”

    That can only make sense if the speed of light from one flash was slower than the speed of light from the other flash, which is impossible.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1615101
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    “The issue is the president is falsely accused of supporting them. He needn’t denounce every group his political opponents and media haters demand he denounce based on their false insinuations of his support.”

    This post is quite surprising coming from you. I never knew you were an Obama supporter.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1615095
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Health,

    “Pres. Trump is NOT PC & feels no need to defend his comments! Therefore if right wackos decide to turn his words around – he doesn’t respond!”

    And that is wrong. Words matter. Communication matters.

    “Trump remembers a world that wasn’t guided by PC. He lives in that world. Unfortunely you only live in your PC World, NOT the Real World!”

    If it were the 1950s, Donald Trump would have had his mouth washed out with soap by now. This “not PC” nonsense is just an excuse to be false, uncivil, and nasty.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1614484
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    “Avram, suspecting President Trump of the type of wink wink anti-Semitism you describe by implication without explicitness is absurd given Trump’s proven track record … of being an overt Oheiv Yisroel”

    Lol, this is the classic “I’m not racist, some of my best friends are black!” retort. It’s not absurd at all. I do not think that Donald Trump subscribes to the racial animus towards Jews espoused by Nazi ideology – in other words, I think he sees Jews as “white”. However, I do think he subscribes to the Jews secretly control the world/desire wealth above all else tropes. But at the end of the day he is a believer in the-ends-justify-the-means. Therefore, he is willing to work with this supposed Jewish cabal to get his financial, political, and attention-getting desires met where applicable, and he is equally willing to rail against the cabal to his base in order to get their votes, while keeping it subtle enough to not completely upset the former collaborations.

    in reply to: Interesting science #1614460
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Doing my best,

    “Anyone know more about this? or how this would work?”

    Einstein used a thought experiment involving a speeding train to demonstrate that time is relative to the inertial frame of the observer.

    Suppose there is a speeding train, and there is a man in the middle of this train. Another man is sitting at a platform outside of the train as it speeds past. Right as the middle of the train is passing the platform, the man on the platform sees lightning strike both ends of the train simultaneously. What does the man inside the train observe? As light from the lightning heads towards his eyes, the train is moving in the direction of one of the bolts, and away from the other. Thus, the light from the lightning strike at the front of the train has a shorter distance to travel to the eyes of the man in the train than the light from the strike in the back. So he’d say the strikes were not simultaneous.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1614438
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Neville ChaimBerlin,

    “If you interpret every time someone criticizes globalism as “the Jews control the world,” then you have apparently been programmed to be subconsciously anti-semitic.”

    It doesn’t matter how I interpret it. It matters how the white supremacists interpret it. I think the whole “globalist vs. capitalist” dichotomy is a false one anyway.

    “If people interpret what he says as this mythical “wink” you liberals”

    “You liberals”, wow. Calm down the keyboard warfare there, realize that I am a human being and that I’m not your enemy, and talk to me like a human being. Thank you.

    “love to bring up, that isn’t his problem. He can’t refrain from talking about the real issues like globalism and immigration just because a small fraction of rightists will take the rhetoric too far.”

    Actually, that is his problem. And it would be quite a simple thing to clarify, “oh, when I say globalists, I do not mean Jews, and I wholeheartedly condemn and reject anyone who twists my words in order to peddle anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.” Yet has he said anything of the sort?

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1614422
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Health,

    “Stop with your lies about Trump!”

    I have not lied. Sorry. כל הפוסל במומו פוסל‎

    “Where were you when Obama was president?!?”

    What does this have to do with President Trump?

    “We don’t even know whether Obama is an Antisemite or not, because it was hidden.”

    Given his lame duck slap of Israel via the UN and his administration’s general tone-deafness, I’d say it was quite possible. President Obama’s rhetoric reflected the anti-Semitism on the left (anti-Israel, anti-milah, anti-shechita, etc.), while President Trump’s rhetoric stirs up the anti-Semitism on the right (Jews control the world and seek to undermine nations, are polluters of purity, etc.). I’m happy to call out both, but the latter is more threatening and imminently dangerous right now.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1613682
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Neville ChaimBerlin,

    “Conspiracies against Jews leading to Antisemitism are out there, but they aren’t being spread by Trump”

    Yes they are. Every time he rails against the globalist conspiracy to ruin America, the white supremacists wink and say hamevin yavin (well, not exactly that, but you know what I mean).

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1613675
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah,

    “To those idiots like Limbaugh, Savage etc,, I’d just wish one of these “toys” shows up in their mailbox so we can wish whats left of them a refuah shelamah.”

    And this rhetoric is just as terrible as what you’re so bothered by from the other “side”.

    in reply to: Antisemitic threat or not? #1613657
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Yes, I have seen anti-Semitic Yelp reviews of kosher restaurants. I’ve also seen ignorant complaints, e.g., stupid pizza place, they had no pepperoni! Or, stupid burger place, they had no cheese! The writing on this review is so poor and incoherent, I can’t be 100% sure that it’s purely anti-Semitic. If the owner/manager indeed was verbally abusing the staff, if the food did indeed smell bad, and if the reviewer’s request for a menu was indeed met with profanity and hostility, then the 1-star rating would certainly be justified. I do not understand the comment about only religious Jews eating there being a catalyst for walking out. If he was uncomfortable with religious Jews, then yes, it would be anti-Semitic. If he meant that the only patrons eating there seemed to be a captive clientele, i.e., there were only religious Jews in there, and they were only there because it was the sole kosher restaurant in the vicinity, then it wouldn’t necessarily be anti-Semitic. But at any rate, it’s very poorly worded.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1611524
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Well Health, what’s the latest false-flag conspiracy spin on this?

    “Why send so many?!?”

    As you said, to scare e/o!

    “These devices weren’t meant to do tons of harm.”

    They were packed with shards of glass. No, these weren’t meant to take out a city block, but they do seem to be designed to kill or maim the ones opening them.

    “Why not send very powerful ones?”

    Because that would require greater intelligence, skill, and resources than this guy likely had. And more powerful bombs would be heavier and harder to send in the mail.

    in reply to: anti vaxxers are wreaking havoc around the world #1611134
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    RebYidd23,

    “We don’t need to change their minds. We only need to vaccinate their children.”

    Can’t do the latter without the former.

    in reply to: anti vaxxers are wreaking havoc around the world #1611116
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Civility, listening, empathetic communication, and evidence-based persuasion rather than fear tactics and threats.

    Anti-vaxxers are not selfish. They love their children more than anyone else does, fear for their safety more than anyone else does, and want to do what is best for them, no matter what anyone else says. And this is exactly what they are supposed to be doing as parents. We are living in a generation where trust has completely broken down. Conservatives don’t trust the government, and think doctors are tools of the government. Liberals don’t trust Big Pharma, and think that doctors are Big Pharma’s drug dealers. Both feel that these big, scary entities do not have their children’s best interests at heart. And when a harried doctor steps into the exam room and explodes at a parent who spent 45 minutes in the waiting room before raising a concern about a vaccine, or the aggressive vaccine schedule, and gives no reassurance, no information, and does not acknowledge the fear that is behind the concern, and instead threatens to refuse care to the child, how is that going to help change minds?

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1611106
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    coffee addict,

    “How does this guy who sent the bombs know where all these people live

    I don’t think you can find it in the white pages”

    Google is much more effective than the White Pages.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1611107
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    1,

    “Anyone with a brain should be questioning the legitimacy of the story, especially after it was confirmed that the package sent to CNN was harmless.”

    There have been numerous instances of white powder getting mailed to prominent figures, and subsequent analysis showing that the powder is harmless. Sometimes the intent is to terrify, not necessarily kill.

    in reply to: Liberal conspiracy #1611100
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Health,

    “The reason I’m thinking that – because no one was killed or injured.”

    No, the reason you’re thinking that is because you believe that anyone who happens to have a different political viewpoint than you do must be evil incarnate. Overwhelmingly, a person who mails a bomb to someone else does not like that person. As for why no one was killed or injured, there are numerous reasons that are far more plausible than a false-flag conspiracy, including:
    1. Many of the recipients are high profile figures, and thus their mail is screened carefully
    2. Once Soros received the suspicious package, everyone else became much more careful with their mail
    3. If the bomber made the packages too easy to detonate, they likely would kill postal workers in the sorting room rather than the intended target, so s/he made them harder to detonate, which increased the chances of their getting discovered before detonation

    in reply to: Lubavitch Hats #1610196
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Neville ChaimBerlin,

    “He’s managed to get like 60% of this thread to be about women going outside when it was supposed to be about Chabad hats lol”

    Meh, smooshed hats are boring. Given your 60% figure, had this thread stayed on topic it would’ve been less than half as long.

    in reply to: Gee thanks, anti-vaxxers #1610197
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    laskern,

    Yup, insulting and denigrating people and their culture will definitely get them on board with you. Good work turning medical policy into a radioactive political football, MK Malinovsky!

    in reply to: Lubavitch Hats #1609779
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    “Was exercising and mental health concerns non-issues from the time of Sarah Imainu through Chazal and the Mechaber of S”A that all cited this restriction, and they only became relevant for the first time in history in recent years?”

    Stop for a minute and think. Today we have cars that allow us to travel for miles while sitting down. We have washing machines, so we don’t have to schlep clothing down to the creek and use a washboard. We have electric stoves and running water, so no more bringing firewood into the house and trips to and from the well with heavy pails. The need for exercise has always existed, but in our generation the opportunities to get it via our daily routine have all but disappeared.

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1598021
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    A king who feels compelled to remind his subjects over and over again that he can boss them around whenever he wants may still be a king, but he is also a small and foolish buffoon. And his subjects will dream of dethroning him.

    Want respect? Be respectable. Want deference? Be worthy of it. Want to be a leader? Stop bloviating about how you have a right to be a leader and LEAD.

    in reply to: Eruv Question (regarding 600K people) #1597841
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    WolfishMusings,

    “Again, where in my OP did you see that I was arguing with anyone — wiser or not?”

    Why assume that 1 was referring specifically to you? He did not explicitly address you in his post.

    in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1597827
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    “And that both blessings need to equally be replaced”

    V’ein kol chadash tachas hashemesh. It’s amazing how the OO copy what the Conservative movement R”L already did decades ago, thinking somehow it’s going to have different results.

    RebYidd23,

    “you are the only one who cares”

    I think the OO activities provoke more objections than the Conservative and Reform movements because they refer to themselves as “Orthodox”, whereas the other movements do not.

    in reply to: Rabbi Miller on walking during davening #1591098
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah,

    “For many yidden, it is more natural for them to move around when they are talking, so it would make more sense that they are relaxed and able to communicate with the Ebeshter in whatever format make it the most effective for them.”

    This doesn’t take into account the fact that there are other people davening in the shul who may be disturbed by the pacing and thus less able to relax and communicate with the Ebeshter themselves.

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1588334
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    “You were upset at my even citing the Halacha in the context of a general halachic discussion. Methinks that’s because you aren’t liking the Halacha cited.”

    Youthinks wrong. And you haven’t answered my questions.

    in reply to: Frolicking Selichos Concert #1588323
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Little Froggie,

    “We all know what happens when words of Torah are taken out and made into songs… how much more for this – AND FOR WHAT ITS BEING USED FOR!”

    Oooh oooh! Can you repost this in the shelo asani isha thread? Slominer’s talking about making a song of that bracha complete with drums and instrumentals.

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1588292
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    CTLAWYER,

    “I’m the family law divorce lawyer.”

    The only one??

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1588290
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    yitzchokm,

    This thread is about the young children of divorced parents, who are not at fault for their parents’ divorce, no matter whether it was right or wrong. So when you ride in on the high horse of moral indignation and state that divorcees should be shunned, it seems based on the context of the thread that you are advocating that children of divorced parents should be marginalized or mistreated. Is this indeed your position?

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1588268
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    “Furthermore, regarding the Halacha I earlier cited, it has been the accepted psak across Klal Yisroel since the time of the Mechaber without any dissent or disagreement by any other poskim”

    So let me get this straight – are you contending that, because we have the Shulchan Aruch, there is no longer a need to have a personal rav? Do you have a rav you go to for shailos? Or do you pasken for yourself based on what you think is your understanding of the Shulchan Aruch? I believe in the authority of the Shulchan Aruch. I do not believe in the ability of a layperson to properly understand the nuances of a shaila and then apply a comprehensive knowledge of the entirety of halacha in order to properly render a psak. There is a lot more to rendering a psak than finding a random siman in the Shulchan Aruch that seems related to the shaila at hand and pulling halachos out of context.

    in reply to: Incorrigible Children #1587747
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    slominer,

    “What about a ben sorer umoreh?”

    Show me a case where someone was actually in this halachic category, and then we can talk.

    in reply to: Incorrigible Children #1587744
    Avram in MD
    Participant

    Joseph,

    Incorrigible is a statement about the caregiver more than the child – i.e., “not able to be corrected, improved, or reformed” by the parent or teacher. The solution, therefore, is to reach out for assistance. A rav, a frum counselor or parenting expert, or even a peer who has an outside perspective.

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 2,517 total)