AviraDeArah

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,801 through 1,850 (of 3,744 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: POR’s comment #2137153
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    The chazon ish, and most other gedolim, held that the dangers of not voting and the resultant chilul Hashem/shmad outweigh the problem of associating with reshoim and the chilul Hashem of doing so.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2137154
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    AAQ, cute, but i digress – “a person should always make themselves like a talmid chochom” applies here, because if someone carries themselves like a TCH, they will have more yiras shomayim…. Just don’t fool yourself into thinking you are one in the process

    in reply to: POR’s comment #2137072
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Aaq, rashi is telling you peshuto shel mikra. His perush is synonymous with the teitch of the pasuk. He was not writing a politically inspired work. Keep your wisenshaft heresy to yourself

    in reply to: POR’s comment #2137068
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yserb, so the majority held of voting and a minority held you can’t vote. Who cares? A majority held that shavers are assur and a minority allowed them – does anyone care? We follow who we follow.

    in reply to: POR’s comment #2137038
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Zushy, claiming that the satmar rov didn’t hold that zionism violated the 13 ikkarim is demonstrably false. It’s literally all over the first Chelek of the sefer. It’s his central theme. He uses it to explain why it’s not brought in shu””a or rambam beferush. That has nothing to do with seeing his statement inside or not.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2137027
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    YO – can you point to a single stitch of evidence that ashkenazim pressured the sefardim to dress like they do? They did it on their own because that’s how bnei torah dressed in that area. They didn’t care where it came from, just that it’s representative of bnei torah at that time and place. I personally would dress like a sefardi ben torah if that became the recognized fashion.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136687
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Aaq, there’s nothing wrong at all if they decided to dress like they did in Europe, but that’s not yabias point. He presumably wants them to dress Western and modern, and is only upset about them dressing European.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2136689
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Aaq, the examples in shas are all immediate actions, not general things which will save indeterminate lives in the bigger picture.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136651
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Mdd, i didn’t set out to bash jews who don’t dress noticeably Jewish, i was trying to show that sefardim dressing European doesn’t mean that they’re losing their mesorah, because the alternatives were either to dress like they did in arab countries or copy the irreligious and less religious Israeli population, who dress like Western goyim. I mentioned that there are ma’alos in the way ashkenazim (and sefardim in their countries) dress, that it’s a constant reminder that they’re Jewish, etc..

    Then you said that it’s enough to wear a yarmulke and tzitzis, to which I’m replying that if sfardim would dress the way yabia thinks they should, they often wouldn’t have any reminders of their jewishness at all, because people in the modern world often completely hide their jewishness.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2136631
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    By that logic, you should always be allowed to be mechalel shabbos for cancer research, because *maybe* you’ll find a cure…it doesn’t work that way

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2136626
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Research isn’t an active pikuach nefesh action… you’re not medakeach es ha’gal. That shailoh was asked by someone whose shabbos is spent reading the new york times.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136624
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Mdd, and how many modern people walk around in baseball caps with their tzitzis tucked in?

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136599
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Begin was the closest thing to a frum PM that Israel ever had. He was very pro-torah, and reached out to the gedolei yisroel. He also kept shabbos and Kashrus. From what I’ve read about him, I think he would have supported sefardim maintaining their religious traditions, why wouldn’t he?

    Yabia, you’re focusing in on one rabbi that i mentioned. He wasn’t just meikil, he was capitulating to zionism. Ashkenazim had that too with shlomo goren. Sefardim had it, although he wasn’t as bad, with one of their chief rabbis. Rather than let his opinions fall into the obscurity they’re supposed to, eliezer melamed based his fake conversion standards on him.

    Rav ovadia was a far greater figure than him anyway, and he was very meikil in general. Ashkenazim had their meikilim too, like the naharsham, for instance.

    Name one p’sak from rav ovadia that was machmir like the ashkenazim – you won’t find it. What you will find, is kulos where he allows sefardim to eat in ashkenazi restaurants who rely on the rema for bishul akum – he bases it on being metztaref the yesh omrim in shu”a that beis yisroel is entirely mutar.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136545
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Also, being machmir in halacha… please provide some examples or sven one example where sefardi practice under rav ovadia became more strict. There aren’t any.

    Rav ovadia championed returning to the ways of the beis yosef, and almost always eschewed the chumros of the kaf hachaim. He was maikil by sefardi standards. Were there misguided sefardi rabbis who happened to be chief rabbis who were extraordinarily lenient, largely due to nationalistic capitulation? Yes, there were. Eav ovadia was not like that.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136541
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    So dressing like secular and modern Israelis is fine, but dressing like the people who they identify with(more religious) is a problem and European influence?

    Jeans and t-shirt is Western influence, so why is that ok but European isn’t?

    And no, it’s not ehrlich to dress like a hippie or chilled out secular person based on a culture of pleasure seeking. They look indiscernible from goyim, and the style isn’t modest. Are there any ehrlich people who wear jeans and tshirts? I’m sure there are, but they’re lack8ng the ma’alos of constant reminders of their jewish ess, and the modesty that accompanies our choice of dress.

    Your problem is that they’re more religious, and i think you’ve all but admitted that.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136487
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Another sefardi source for kolel is the ohr hachaim, who wrote that anyone who wants to learn all day with emunah peshutah will be supportd min hashomayim.

    He also questioned if in his time, since “nismaatu halevavos “, if it’s still an ideal to work and learn together for most people. Kal vechomer today.

    And zionism was opposed by many sefardim. The sefardi beis din in yerushalayim put rabbi kooks books in cherem. The baba sali made a siyum on the vayoel moshe and said it’s the sefer of the generation.

    In reality, most ashkenazi rabbis, if we’re looking at quantity and not level, were supportive of a state in some way, especially after the fact. Most sefardi rabbis probably were as well. It’s the gedolei olam, the chazon ish, brisker rov, who saw passed it, and their view became verified and accepted as time went on and people saw how bad the state is and how baseless the ideology is.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136485
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yabia, most shas voters do not wear black hats and jackets;m, and the gedolim wear the “glima”. I cannot believe that your accusation of being litvishe boils down to the clothing many members wear and the embrace of kollel life.

    The kolel system is not ashkenazi or sefardi. It was done, according to the ran( a sefardi!!) In bavel, but was not the norm in either Europe or the sefardi countries. All sectors of klal yisroel recognized the practical need for kolel on some level, some push it more and some less, but there’s nothing ashkenazic about it.

    Would you rather the sefardim wear Arabic clothes like they did before moving to Israel? Or would you rather them dress like Israelis in jeans and t-shirts? Would that make them more sefardi? Why not just dress like the most ehrlich people?

    It would be great if sefardim went back to the way they dressed in Iraq, etc… But they didn’t. Before rav ovadia, they didn’t learn much and dressed like modern dati people, so which is better?

    Also, most sefardi rabbonim were very against shaitels; that’s one way you can see their external differences.

    No wonder you held off on answering; you knew how empty these claims are.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136431
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yabia, a host of accusations without a single example – i asked you twice how they are litvishe, and you have not given any explanation, just stating that they’re litvishe.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136354
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    What exactly is not naturally sefardi about anything associated with shas? Sefardim don’t seem to look at it that way, as almost all of them support it. As far as i know, the only prominent sefardi rov who didn’t support shas is rav yaakov hillel.

    They build yeshivos which teach sefardi mesorah; i have no idea what you can possibly mean by saying that they’re not sefardi.

    Maybe because you think that “natural sefardi” equals an almost illiterate farmer who kisses the hand of the mekubal? Pity if you think that’s all a sefardi person is capable of.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2136313
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    That’s not unexpected at all – increasing too much too fast is just k’balo kach palto…easy in, easy out

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2136293
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Dov, that davening regimen is in extreme circumstances and definitely not meant to be permanent. You need to be cautious with that. Also, pesukeo dizimra isn’t a “chumra”

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136255
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yabia, that’s really not true. Their leadership is and always was sefardi. Rac ovadia was the singular most accepted authority on all things sefardi, and he was the head for decades. Rav shalom cohen was a brilliant sefardi gadol too.

    Shas built up sefardi yiddishkeit on a level not comparable to anyone else. Yeshivos, girls schools, infrastructure, everything; there’s almost no sefardi entity not directly or indirectly built and supported by shas members.

    If by “Lithuanian charedi” you mean that they believe in the primacy of torah, and aren’t very zionistic, then you’re just describing what you personally feel sefardim should be.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136236
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Damoshe – bribery is assur when you’re a judge. There’s no prohibition of taking bribes for political favors.

    Taxes aren’t obligatory in Israel, as the state is illegitimate, according to rav chaim kanievsky.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136196
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Deri has done a tremendous amount of good; don’t blindly follow headlines in haaretz. Frum politicians are people, and might make mistakes, but what he’s accused of is not that big of a deal anyway and isn’t, as far as i know, even a violation of halacha.

    would you prefer an anti frum person like lieberman, who has not been accused of “crime”?

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2136053
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Rav Hirsch actually explains kiddushin 29b according to the ran, which explains “ha lan ve’ha lahu” that in bavel you should get married first and then devote yourself to learning Torah, because the women were strong and able to support their husbands in learning. In eretz yisroel they were weaker and unable to, so it was better to devote years to learning first and then get married, when the man will have to support. Not all rishonim understood the gemara that way, but rav hirsch goes with it.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2136051
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yabia, it’s been discussed ad nauseum on here – you won’t find a single posek representative of a stream of yiddishkeit (i.e., chasam sofer, gaon, rav hirsch, rav akiva eiger, ben ish chai, mishnah berurah…) Who advocates following that rambam. I’m sure there are obscure teshuva seforim which you could dig up and cite, but the baalei mesorah do NOT go with it, without exception.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2135995
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Aaq, nobody has a mesorah to follow your favorite 2 sentences from the rambam. They just don’t. Yekkies who believe in working also opened kollelim, like dayan grunfeld. You’re not convincing anyone and it’s just sad at this point. We follow poskim who came way after the rambam, there’s a chain of command. The poskim don’t go with it. Whatever emotional reasons you have for ignoring that is just not useful to anyone else and would result in less Torah, less nachas ruach to Hashem, less yiddishkeit, and more darkness in the world at a time when we need the light of torah more than ever to fight the nisyonos of our generation.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2135961
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    akuperman; if someone feels that it’s “beneath” them to take charity, but could succeed in learning, it’s gaavah. If he thinks that the halacha discourages it and wants to follow the rambam, well, the radvaz says that we would have forgotten the torah if we would have followed that rambam, and rav moshe says that it’s gaavah as well in our time.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2135761
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Ujm, what do you think of the hagdara that i proposed?

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2135760
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Aaq, it’s true that yissachar and zevulun have the same schar, but how many baalei batim have a total Y/Z relationship? Most, do not. Especially those who deride kollel. How will they stack up to talmidei chachamin?

    Also, my rosh yeshiva says bshem the gaon that Y/Z having the same schar only applies if the Z tried his best to bea Y, but hashgocha led him to have to work. Otherwise it’s not logical that one can just spuriously decide that he doesn’t want Torah.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2135614
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yungerman, women who keep 72 are usually frum enough to know that they’re supposed to follow their husband’s minhagim, but i agree to you in theory.

    in reply to: POR’s comment #2135604
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    I don’t understand the complaint about zionism and swearing falsely not being one of the 13 ikkarim or 3 chamuros. Shabbos isn’t, either. I’m very confused and it sounds like reductive polemics, not a serious statement. I have no idea if he ever said such a thing, so I’m talking about what I’m seeing here quoted, and not directing my statement at the person

    Also, if he said that the satmar rov’s opinion on zionism doesn’t relate to the ikkarim… He clearly never read vayoel Moshe. The satmar rov brings multiple sources throughout the sefer that the 3 shavuos are related to denying bias hamoshiach.

    in reply to: Meikil=Less Religious? #2135602
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Depends; if someone has the attitude of not wanting to be bothered by mitzvos, then yes, they are less religious. It also depends on the issue; being maikil on talmud Torah, tznius, or other fundamentals, is usually indicative of a larger problem.

    If you view your life as something you do for yourself, when you go to work, eat, have leisure time, and find yourself troubled by pesky halachos that get in the way of “your life” then you’re not very religious. A religious person views their life as avodas Hashem. As long as that’s your view, being meikil on various individual shailos doesn’t mean much.

    And of course, you’re supposed to have a rov whose psakim you follow, so if you’re doing that, you’re definitely not “less religious”

    in reply to: Should Tanach be Taught in Cheder? #2135576
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Syag, if that’s the case, he’s just insulting himself by stooping to the level of a 3rd grader. That thought didn’t even cross my mind

    Shimon; I’m pretty sure i can do that with most parshios, especially the ones that aren’t in vayikra.

    in reply to: Should Tanach be Taught in Cheder? #2135481
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    This is the first time someone has though I’m a woman lol

    in reply to: Should Tanach be Taught in Cheder? #2135401
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    When i said missionaries, i was referring to the Israeli ones who know Hebrew. You’re correct that the goyim usually don’t know it at all.

    Shimon – no one’s saying not to know tanach. It’s a mitzvah. And an obligation. What I’m saying is that it’s not the main thing in practice due to our inability to take from it what was intended. Its STUDY is definitely not the “foundation” of Torah, because you won’t learn anything about normative yiddishkeit from reading a blank tanach. Quite the opposite; you’ll come away with twisted ideas and misunderstandings of the text, such as the examples i gave. But you’ll also, like the chasam sofer said, minimize people like shaul, dovid, who made errors. You’ll think they’re not different than you.

    in reply to: Should Tanach be Taught in Cheder? #2135264
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    User, rav boruch ber DID dance with a sefer of torah sheball peh on simchas torah – gra”ch al harambam. He felt that it was the shpitz torah she baal peh. He would dance with both the sefer Torah and his rebbes sefer at the same time.

    Also, how is gemara any less the word of God than chumash? That’s very not Orthodox. If anything, a line gemara represents God’s will in the revealed sense, because it’s more accessible and clearer than what Hashem hid inside the pesukim of tanach.

    My point about the seforim we learn isn’t that they’re to the exclusion of tanach. Let me clarify – if a person reads tanach, he will not grasp even one basic notion of yiddishkeit the way he’s meant to. He might come away thinking all sorts of apikorsus too, like naaseh Odom, yad Hashem, etc…

    What you DO get from learning the seforim, is yiddishkeit. They quote pesukim and chazal all the time, but they’re explaining what those pesukim and maamarim mean, as opposed to the blind study of it alone.

    Even with rashi, you’d need to be quite a talmid chochom to erect a Torah worldview from tanach itself; you gain much more yiras shomayim and daas Torah from sifrei mussar and hashkofa.

    It’s not belittling tanach chas veshalom, it’s belittling our lowly place in the way we relate to it.

    in reply to: Which country had the most Tzadikim? #2135219
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Reb e, my education was also very weak – i grew up in modern orthodox fantasy land where nobody knows anything – there’s no excuse. I woke up, picked myself up, and had people teach me learning skills. I spent 2 years in a lower shiur to learn how to make a leining on gemara, tosfos, maharsha, maharam shif. Then i went to a higher shiur where my head was on a rollercoaster ride everyday.

    I’m also not especially smart. Anyone can do what i did. They chose to chase after havlei haolam and not only not care about learning, but deride those who do, and think that because they can name all the kings of the shvatim that they know more than a kollel man.

    in reply to: Should Tanach be Taught in Cheder? #2135216
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Phil, sorry, that’s just not true. Torah is adus, a testament to what transpired. Torah sheb”p is in torah shebichs”v, as the gaon would learn from a sefer torah and see the entire torah sheba”p, but in the level that we learn it, there’s not one facet of yiddishkeit that you’re going to understand just by knowing tanach. And that’s why missionaries and frei people do just fine in tanach contests while they know nothin of judaism

    in reply to: Which country had the most Tzadikim? #2135175
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Anyone who thinks that lomdus is just chilukim never touched a maaracha of rav akiva eiger. They probably can’t even read a tosfos without getting stuck.

    in reply to: Most Jewish Communities=No Mesora #2135174
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Most of us have a mesorah of innovation. A mesorah which is specifically to be mechadesh, within the mesorah-given rules and thought process.

    in reply to: Should Tanach be Taught in Cheder? #2135171
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yabia, tell me one aspect of yiddishkeit that you are missing out on (besides the mitzvah to know the entire torah) if all you learn is divrei chazal?

    Tanach is not the “basis” of yiddishkeit; mesorah and torah shebaal peh are. Without that, we have books that we don’t understand and commandments that are incomprehensible.

    Chavivin divrei sofrim midivrei Torah.

    Do yourself a favor. Take off the knit fabric, open a sefer besides a blank tanach, and see what kind of yiddishkeit is presented by its torch bearers. learn mesilas yeshorim, chovoa halevavos. The baalei mussar, maybe some chasidus. Learn the depth of Torah, not stories about people you think you have some grasp of.

    It’s like the chasam sofer said, people who emphasize tanach (besides taimanim, thsy have a strong mesorah for this) minimize its importance, because they think they understand things and that the people of tanach were just simple people like us.

    in reply to: Which country had the most Tzadikim? #2134774
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    yabia – having learned the immeasurable depth of reb akiva aiger and the gaon’s torah, when i compare it with sefardi seforim, i don’t see anything similar, i just don’t. Im sure the gedolim like the ben ish chai, chida, etc…were just as big, but by and large, every other sefer ive seen has been drush or psak halacha, or teshuvos.

    i can measure the stature by the content of the seforim. for example, the words of the rishonim aren’t at face value very complex; we believe in their greatness by mesorah and by what achronim told us about them – but we dont need any mesorah to see the greatness of rav akiva aiger and the like; just reading their words shows you the indescribable greatness of torah that they had. that includes the dibros moshe, chazon ish, reb chaim, and many others. sefardim don’t have seforim like that that i’ve seen – maybe there are, but im not aware.

    re data about sefardim being not very into learning after the war – syians in NY didn’t build yeshivos. they built a mixed day school and fancy ornate shuls. most of them didn’t end up keeping all the mitzvos; many intermarried with fake converts(hence the “edict”) and those that did keep more and learn more, eventually, after rav ovadia set the tone, built up communities like ateret torah, which are on par with the ashkenaz yeshiva world.

    before rav ovadia, a certain gadol told me that the image of a sefardi in america was “eineh vos ken mohl nisht gelernt”

    but the ones who were behind ateret learned in ashkenaz places. to this day most sefardi rabbonim in america learned in the ashkenaz torah bastions like BMG, chaim berlin, and especially mir yeshiva in brooklyn.

    in eretz yisroel, that wasn’t the case; sefardi yeshivos had talmidei chachamim, so much so that when a certain gadol visited porat yosef in the 30’s he said that the bachurim were no different than in mir or kletzk.

    in reply to: Should Tanach be Taught in Cheder? #2134773
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    yabia, to you it’s not a question because you’re not .000001% of the chasam sofer.

    maybe learn not just answers but also learn from gedolim what to ask? that’s how my rebbeim taught me tosfos; to understand what and why they’re asking, not just to answer their kushyos.

    edited

    in reply to: Game Room In Yeshiva #2134602
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    There’s a big difference between an activity which is exercise, and thus healthy for the body, versus games which are fun but not productive

    in reply to: Which country had the most Tzadikim? #2134552
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Yabia, the taimanim are not sefardi at all.

    There were some sefardi gedolim after the inquisition, no doubt. And thsy were no less than their Ashkenazi counterparts. But in sheer number, the amount of Torah centers was less, the population was less, and they simply didn’t produce generations the likes of the shach and taz, reb akiva aigers, vilna gaons, noda beyehudas, etc…the hamon am also weren’t as educated towards the end, before the war. Ashkenazim were more successful in maintaining high standards of torah than sefardim. Rav ovadia changed that, and wanted to restore the pride of the Sefardim, who had fallen into a complacency of Sub -par education, which was replete with chunash, kabalah and sipurei tzadikim, but didn’t stress becoming talmidei chachamim.

    in reply to: More Bar than Mitzvah #2134484
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Marx, when you’re walking on a path, you’re not sitting in the spot where the women are washing bekevius. An extreme display of pritzus, such as mixed dancing, is something that’s also far worse than  women washing clothes

    edited

    in reply to: Which country had the most Tzadikim? #2134378
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    ujm, I don’t know if that estimate is accurate – yerushalayim had tons of gedolei olam, including rav shlomo zalman, roshei yeshiva of chevron, mir, ponevezh…

    I think it’s about equal in quantity, too

    in reply to: Is every Yid a big tzaddik? #2134293
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Menachem, i disagree. Being moser nefesh for one’s country in itself isn’t heroic or praiseworthy. If a black man sacrifices for klal yisroel because he thinks he’s Jewish(like kanye west, black hebrews), is he sacrificing for the real klal yisroel, or just to his fake contrived fairy tale?

    Same with a totally frei jew – they have absolutely no idea what a Jew is; to them it’s no different than an italian, or spanish person championing spanish and italian causes.

    in reply to: Is every Yid a big tzaddik? #2134230
    AviraDeArah
    Participant

    Hey Ari, check this out

    משא”כ נפשות אומות עובדי גלולים הן משאר קליפות טמאות שאין בהן
    טוב כלל כמ”ש בע”ח שער מ”ט פ”ג וכל טיבו דעבדין האומות עובדי גלולים לגרמייהו עבדין וכדאיתא בגמרא ע”פ וחסד לאומים חטאת שכל צדקה וחסד שאומות עובדי גלולים עושין אינן אלא להתייהר כו’:
    Tanya perek1

    I love pointing out to people how their hashkofos are diametrically opposed to what it says in seforim hakedoshim.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,801 through 1,850 (of 3,744 total)