Avi K

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,301 through 2,350 (of 3,463 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Torah v. Morals #1152047
    Avi K
    Participant
    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152400
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer, he is your fellow Jew. That gives him the right (especially if he is over 50). Moreover, if we have the right to voice our own opinions we can also opine as to your priorities. I suggest that you heed Obama’s advice to Howard U grads. Prof. Jonathan Adler wrote in the Volokh Conspiracy that they needed to hear it (another person who advises strangers as to their priorities) and I think you do too.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152396
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer, would you have disliked Lou Gehrig? Babe Ruth was a also likable guy albeit an unfaithful husband and a bit of a glutton. I once knew an American-born Catholic of German extraction who went ballistic whenever he heard about anti-Semitism as relatives of his were murdered for hiding Jews.

    Dbrim, we have a universal message as well. Rav Kook says that we will achieve this when we are all here in EY and have a Torah state. However, if someone must live in Chutz laAretz temporarily he should consider himself an emissary of Torah as a light unto the nations. This includes prioritizing EY as the gentiles are judged by how they treat us. Not to mention the strategic value of Israel and the shared values (which is why the conservatives support us and the liberals are at best lukewarm – the former want an America based on traditional values and the latter want an Obamanation).

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152390
    Avi K
    Participant

    ???”? ?????? ??,??

    ?????? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ????, ??? ??? ???? ????? ???? ??????

    ????? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ???, ????? ?????? ?????? ?????

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152389
    Avi K
    Participant

    Charlie, the Rema and the Chatam Sofer have mandated it. Regarding, Jews in the Politburo, there is a joke that at one meeting Trotsky whispered to Sverdlov “Throw out the goy (Stalin) and get someone else. I have yahrtzeit”. BTW, his great=grandson is frum and lives in a settlement.

    in reply to: Chief Rabbi: Could we sit and study Torah without soldiers? #1151837
    Avi K
    Participant

    Moreover, that only applies to special defense measures that are the result of galut but not measures that kings normally take to protect their countries (Chatam Sofer Baba Batra 8a -“??? ??? ?? ????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??? ??? ???? ?????… ??? ????? ???? ???????????? ??????? ????? – ?? ????? ??? ????”).

    See “??? ?????? ????? ?????? ???????” by Rav Azriah Ariel footnote 3

    in reply to: Chief Rabbi: Could we sit and study Torah without soldiers? #1151836
    Avi K
    Participant

    MW, he says all go. All is all. As for the talmid chacham in Shulchan Aruch, that refers to someone who is on the level of Torato omanuto. No Internet, no newspapers, no radio, no chazzanut concerts, no talking about politics or the weather. Only learning (although some say that he can work in order to earn a subsistence income).

    in reply to: Pets & Halacha #1152840
    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, its use is not prohibited. It is a useless object (muktze machmat gufo) as you cannot use it on Shabbat (unless you are a Chabadnik – the Ball HaTanya allows ripping toilet paper). The reason why it can be used in a case of dire need (altouugh not ripping on the perforations) is that it is an issur d’rabbanan being that you do not care about the exact size of the paper. Kevod haberiot overrides d’rabbanans.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152380
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer, we are discussing whether or not certain laws are good for the Jews. As for Halacha not obligating most Americans, that simply is not correct. Even the gentiles are obligated by the sheva mitzvot – and according to some, such as the Rema (Responsum 10) the obligation of dinim requires them to adopt all of Choshen Mishpat. The fact that most are unaware of their obligations is another matter.

    Mdd, thank you.

    in reply to: Chief Rabbi: Could we sit and study Torah without soldiers? #1151828
    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, we should praise them for the good things they did. Chazal praised Omri for adding a city to EY (Sanhedrin 102b).

    in reply to: Chief Rabbi: Could we sit and study Torah without soldiers? #1151821
    Avi K
    Participant

    Sam, that was not a milchemet mitzva. In a milchement mitzva all go (Rambam Hilchot Melachim 7:4) – and all of Israel’s wars have been in this category (ibid 5:1). Of course, there are support troops as well as combat troops. Rav Nachman Kahane suggested periodic exams to decide who would learn full time in battei midrashot, who would be part of the IDF Rabbinate and so forth. I personally would also require those completely deferred to dedicate their learning each day to the success of the IDF, put out books and articles on the halachot of war, etc.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152368
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer,

    1. The point is not what the law is but what it should be. regarding the brokers, IMHO if they were only acting on their own opinions even in the absence of anti-discrimination laws they would have been liable for violating their obligation to obtain the best deals. If they were representing the feelings of the community I would have been glad to discover this and looked elsewhere.

    2. The question whether regarding civil unions are acceptable halachically involves whether or not an intimate relationship is implied. For example, no one objects to nominating a friend as one’s beneficiary on an insurance policy as there is no implication beyond a desire to help him financially.

    in reply to: Could there be a State of Israel Without the Lomdei Torah? #1151762
    Avi K
    Participant

    Thisis an old machloket. See Sanhedrin 49a regarding David and Yoav.

    in reply to: Chief Rabbi: Could we sit and study Torah without soldiers? #1151817
    Avi K
    Participant

    Nevile, Rav Kook said that explicitly. He also told Ben Yehuda to do teshuva (he replied “Maybe” and died the next day, which was Shabbat). He also eulogized Herzl and explained why the secularists are so ant-Torah – their job is to build the material side of EY and gather in the exiles. This makes them think that there is only the material side.

    Sam, I have not heard that. However, the Gra (quoted in “Kol HaTor”) and Rav Teichtal (“Em HaBanim Semeicha”) say that opponents of yishuv EY have been infected by the spies’ sin.

    in reply to: Chief Rabbi: Could we sit and study Torah without soldiers? #1151787
    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, if Hashem wants to give you parnassa He does not need for you to get a job. Even David HaMelech needed an army (Sanhedrin 49a).

    in reply to: Kol Isha re non-Jews #1151616
    Avi K
    Participant

    Charlie, women are obligated in “lifnei iver”.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152352
    Avi K
    Participant

    Sam, actually it might be better if they did not show up. “No man’s liberty or property is safe so long as the legislature is in session” (either Mark Twain or Gideon John Tucker). In any case, they have the right to reject a nomination. Not considering it is something like a pocket veto.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152348
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer,

    1. Oregon may be in the headlines but this is their declared national agenda.

    2. Even if the celebration is in another place the baker is compelled to participate in the celebration by providing a cake. If it is a plain cake then you have a case as they are allowed to eat cake. However, putting “Congratulations on your marriage” seems to me to be compelled speech. how SCOTUS will go will depend very much on who are the justices – as Gobitis and Barnette discovered.

    3. Please cite the law that obligates them to consider a nomination.

    4. Refua sheleima.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152344
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer,

    1. The owner of the wedding hall is renting his property explicitly to be used for an aveira.

    2. If it can force a baker to bake a cake why can’t it force someone to perform a marriage? Both are providing services.

    3. Ask Oregon Judge Vance Day about judges refusing to perform same-sex marriages.

    4. POTUS appoints Federal judges. In particular, there are three justices on SCOTUS who are around the eighty year old mark so the next one might well be able to setthe legal tone in America for the next generation.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152335
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer,

    1. The owner of the hall is certainly a participant. It may well be prohibited as mechazek yadei ovrei aveira. The caterers might not be as they are only selling food. In any case, as there are others who will gladly take money to participate do there is no reason not to grant a religious exception. In any case, the law is requiring them to do something – sell or provide a service for these farces.

    2. We were discussing America.

    3. If it can tell him that he cannot perform a ceremony (e.g. a polygamous marriage) why can’t it tell him that he must perform one. Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. does not preclude the possibility. For that matter, why can’t it revoke tax-exempt status of a shul as with a religious university. Why can’t it stipulate that the person’s license to perform marriages will be revoked? What about religious judges as this is not one of their regular functions? On the other hand, if accomodations are made for taking off on religious holidays why not for this (Prof. Eugene Volokh once suggested this).

    in reply to: What do these stand for? #1151497
    Avi K
    Participant

    [sic] is short for “sic erat scriptum”, “thus was it written” in Latin.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152329
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer,

    2. Use of laws to enforce discrimination is another matter. I was referring to homeowners who do not want to sell to Jews. However, in the end, as George Jefferson said, there is no white power or black power, only green power. The fact of the matter is that there was a tremendous movement of Jews to the suburbs after WW2. Jews, as Milton Friedman points out in “Capitalism and Freedom” have flourished under free enterprise. If they were excluded from the fraternity or sorority they started their own. If they were excluded form the country club they started their own. If they were excluded from Big Law they started their own firms or went into public service. The free choice door swings both ways.

    3. Secular law cannot override Halacha except in some areas of dinei mamanot where that is part of the Halacha. For example, if the US would ban berit mila it would be incumbent on Jews to disobey. If you say differently than you are making an idol out of the lawmakers. Of course, aliya is the best answer anyway but not everyone is able, at least not on the spur of the moment.

    4. I was referring to Jewish Communists in America.

    5. I never wrote that Trump embodies Jewish values. He also does not have to. Only Bnei Noach values. Hillary certainly does not. In any case ,the question this year is not who is better but who is worse. Of course, if the FBI recommends indicting her than the ballgame changes completely. Her “adopted daughter” Huma Abedin said tjat she would be terrified if she were in Hillary’s shoes.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152323
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawyer., FYI, the Halacha sometimes requires us to discriminate. For example, a Jew who has his own business must prefer Jews in hiring. On the other hand, if the business must be open on Shabbat and Yom Tov he must seek a gentile partner. As foir neighborhoods, I personally do not understand why a Jew would want tol ive among anti-Semites. Besides, there was far less assimilation when people lived in tethnic neighborhoods. Even Jewish Communists married other Jews. Not to mention that “equal opportunity” laws gave rise to Affirmative Action – the exact opposite. So too, gay “rights” is giving way to government compulsion to participate in these “weddings”.

    In any case, it is instructive to read the words of Ludwig von Mises, himself the victim of anti-Jewish discrimination:

    Elsewhere he writes:

    “The market does not directly prevent anybody from arbitrarily inflicting harm on his fellow citizens; it only puts a penalty upon such conduct. The shopkeeper is free to be rude to his customers provided he is ready to bear the consequences. The consumers are free to boycott a purveyor provided they are ready to pay the costs. What impels every man to the utmost exertion in the service of his fellow men and curbs innate tendencies toward arbitrariness and malice is, in the market, not compulsion and coercion on the part of gardeess, hangmen, and penal courts; it is self-interest.”

    As for questionable business dealings, what about all of the Clintons’ dealings? Not to mention the fact that Hillary was fired from the Watergate committee for unethical behavior. was an accomplice to the murder of American diplomats, etc. edited

    in reply to: The Future of the State of Israel? #1151472
    Avi K
    Participant

    Akuperma, actually many Chareidim are going into hi-tech. Their Gemaar heads make them perfect for it. The secular are also becoming more and more interested in Judaism. Rosh Yehudi gives lectures in the herat of secualr T.A. and HaShomer HaTzair kibbutzim are opening shuls,

    Mdd, Rambam says at the end of Hilchot Melachim:

    ???? ???? ?????, ???????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?? ?????, ??????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ????? ????? ????, ????? “???? ???? ????? . . .” (????? ?,?). ???? ??? ???? ?????, ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???, ????? ?? ????? ??????? ??????: ??? ??? ???? “????? ?????? ??? . . . ?? ???? ????, ?????? ???????” (???? ?,??). ??? ???? ????? ????? ???????? ????????, ???????? ??????. ????? ????? ????? ??? ???????, ?????? ??? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?????. ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ????? ?????, ?? ???? ??? ???–????? ??? ?????? ??????, ?????.

    ?? ????? ??????? ??????? ???? ?????–?? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ??????, ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ?????? ??????: ??? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ??????, ??? ???? ??? ???? ?????, ??? ????? ???? ????? ???, ??? ??????? ?????? ?????.

    ?????? ????, ?? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ????? ??? ???? ??????–?????? ???? ?????? ????, ??? ??????? ?????? ????. ??? ???? ??? ?? ?????, ??? ???? ?? ?’ ????. ?????? ???? ????? ??????, ??????? ????? ??????? ???????; ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ????, ????? “?? ???? ????, ??? ?? ?’, ????, ??? ?????” (?????? ??,?).

    MW, some Jews will be considered “uberyidden” because they really are, either because of yi??us (cohanim and levi’im) or because of superior Torah wisdom.

    It could be that there will still be questions regarding laws and monetary disputes butthey will be resolved peacefully by battei din with losers accepting defeat gracefully. Work will either be done my gentiles or by robots (the navi only says “others”).

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152302
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTlawuer, a liberal in the American context (the European/Israeli context it is more like a libertarian) is someone who wants integrated schools in Mississippi, integrated neighborhoods in Mississippi (remember the Forest Hills controversy in NYC) and freely spends other people’s money. Clinton is worse than an opportunist. She is a liar, a crook, and an enemy of Jewish rights to all of Eretz Yisrael. She was also an incompetent Sec of State who was complicit in the murders of American diplomats in Benghazi. Trump is definitely not a conservative (see Russell Kirk’s “Ten Conservative Principles”) and I have many problems with his campaign but at least his Mideast advisers have close ties to the settlement movement. As a successful businessman he hopefully will be able to pick the right people for the right jobs, delegate powers and be a great communicator.

    in reply to: being Niftar Al Kiddush Hashem #1180797
    Avi K
    Participant

    Rav Chaim Brisker said that it is preferable, and much more difficult, to live for kidddush Hashem.

    in reply to: The Future of the State of Israel? #1151453
    Avi K
    Participant

    Akuperma, actually the Chareidim are already moving. Young Chareidim are joining the IDF (hence the increasing shrillness and even violence of the die-hard extremists) and the general economy. The moetzet chochmei ha trah of UTJ approved, albeuit grudgingly, sitting in the government (actually Aguda was in the first government but then they hardened their stance).

    On the other hand, the RZ are becoming more oriented towards learning and are establishing NGOs and holding yamei iyun on how to run a state according to Torah. I heard from Rav Yeshayahu Shteinberger in the names of Rav Kook and Rav Soloveichik that this is the nevua of Yehezkel regarding the union of Yehuda’s stick with Yoseph’s stick/ Yehuda, who established a state within a state in Goshen represents the Chareidim and Yoseph, who was an integral part of the government, represents the RZ.

    The demographics state that Israel’s future is bright. The first flowering of our redemption continues to flower.

    Health, actually not having a state might be after Mashiach. According to Rambam eevryone will keep Torah without coercion so it would seem that we will be able to have anarcho-capitalism.

    in reply to: Vote third parties #1152296
    Avi K
    Participant

    Churchill defended his support for Stalin ym”s during WW2 by saying that if Hitler ym”s had invaded Hell he would have at least made a favorable reference to the Devil in the House of Commons. After WW2 he was a staunch supporter of the Cold War.

    In any case, there is no such thing as a wasted vote. It makes a statement, most importantly to Hashem. Otherwise, a Republican in a deep blue state or a Democrat in a deep red state should also stay home.

    in reply to: El Al Has Flights On Shavuos! #1151692
    Avi K
    Participant

    From “Penyanei Halacha” by Rav Eliezer Melamed

    ??? ?? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????

    ???? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???????? ?????, ???? ?????? ??? ??? ?????, ???? ?? ??? ???? ???? ????? ??? ?? ????? ??????, ???? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?????. ??? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ???, ???? ????? ?????, ??? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? (????? ?, ?; ??”? ???, ?).

    ????? ????? ????? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ???? ??? ??? ????. ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ?????. ???? ????? ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ???, ???? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???????, ???? ??? ????? ????? ???? ??? ???? (???’ ???”?, ?”? ???, ?).

    It would seem that according to all opinions a ben Eretz Yisrael can do actions which are only prohibited d’rabbanan, especially if no one knows that he is a frum Jew. Thus, if you wear a baseball cap and keep your tzitziot inside you can probably take a cab driven by a goy to where you are staying (or even better, if feasible, take public transportation, as being that the majority are goyim we say that it runs for them).

    in reply to: Who's Worse – Trump or Clinton? #1190425
    Avi K
    Participant

    “Mostly truthful” – she made 10 million statements in her life and 5 million + 1 were truthful (and those 5 million + 1 include correctly stating her name, stating that Chelsea is her daughter, etc.).

    in reply to: Who's Worse – Trump or Clinton? #1190418
    Avi K
    Participant

    Not to mention, that as Sec of State she harangued Netanyahu for forty-five minutes for daring to build in Yerushalayim. On the other hand, Trump chose as advisers two people with close ties to the settler movement. Hopefully now that he has the nomination he will move more towards mainstream conservative positions. His choice of a running mate will say a great deal.

    in reply to: Who's Worse – Trump or Clinton? #1190416
    Avi K
    Participant

    Dave, you are correct. I read some more about him after I posted.

    in reply to: Who's Worse – Trump or Clinton? #1190400
    Avi K
    Participant

    What about Gary Johnson? At least he will leave religious people and Israel alone. Libertarians are very consistent – people can do what they want so long as they do violate someone else’s rights so one can do toeva but one can also discriminate against someone who does it (e.g. refuse to rent an apartment or take part in a “wedding”). The Libertarian Party platform states “We would end the current government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid, guarantees, and diplomatic meddling.” Morover, he has administrative experience as governor of New Mexico.

    in reply to: Shidduchim for Jews of color #1151062
    Avi K
    Participant

    Not only the Syrians. Rav Aviner said that during the colonial period rich Jews fell in love with gentile French women and tried to pressure the rabbis into performing pro forma giurim so they made a blanket takkana. In some countries the rabbanim will not perform giurim because of possible friction with the authorities who see the state as bound up with the Catholic church.

    in reply to: Shidduchim for Jews of color #1151053
    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, there are also young widows r”l. As for physical attributes, there are certain blemishes that can be a cause for divorce (see Even HaEzer 39:3 with Rambam Hilchot Biat HaMikdash ch. 8). However, love conquers all (Even HaEzer 154;2). BTW, sinister” is Latin for left-handed. On the other hand, Ehud was able to save Am Yisrael because he was left-handed.

    in reply to: Shidduchim for Jews of color #1151000
    Avi K
    Participant

    Yehudayona, it is a machloket Rishonim if a cohen can marry the daughter of a ger and a gioret. The Mechaber paskens (Even HaEzer 7:21) to be machmir l’chatchila. This even continues for several generations (e.g. son of ger and gioret who marries gioret) until one parent is a Yisrael. Of course, if a black convert would marry a Yemenite or Malabari Jew the daughter would be black and eligible to marry cohanim according to all opinions and then there could be a black cohen.

    in reply to: Shidduchim for Jews of color #1150986
    Avi K
    Participant

    Newbee, some families could use some color. Actually, some Ashkenazim are swarthy whereas some Sepharadim (particular from North Africa) are very fair-skinned.

    in reply to: Op-Ed: Houston Jews – Rebuild in Israel! #1150177
    Avi K
    Participant

    Actually, there already is a holocaust. It is the self-holocaust of assimilation. This also also occurred in Germany leading some demographers to believe that if the Nazis ym”s had not come to power German Jewry would have virtually disappeared in a generation or two.

    The atmosphere today in Europe is reminiscent of eighty years ago. In America democratic institutions are strong and there is high regard for Jews outside the major campuses. However, a secular liberalism that is trying to force everyone to bow down to the idol of toeva is making it harder to maintain Jewish values. There is also the issue of ballooning tuition charges, which is forcing many parents to send their children to public schools – and public schools today are not the bastions of conservatism that they were in past generations.

    Ideally, Jews should make aliya because it is a mitzva but history has shown that Hashem will settle for lo lishma.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180416
    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, ask him if you can be exempt as when you are in the sukka you are thinking of his attitude and that makes you mitztaer. Ask him also how a Chassid can be mitztaer when he is supposed to always be b’simcha.

    Abba, this is his exact wording:

    ? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ??? ???? ????? ??????? ??? ??????

    ?? ??? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ????? ???

    ???? ???? ????? ?????

    ??? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ??? ????? ?????

    ?????? ?? ????? ???? ????????

    ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ????

    ????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????

    ??? ??”? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ?????

    ??? ??? ??? ???? ??????? ??? ??? ???????.

    ??? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ????

    ??????.

    It comes out that he does not explicitly say to wear them, only that that was the custom in his area. Rabbi Menachem Posner, the Staff Editor of chabad.org says that their minhag is not to wear them on Chol HaMoed. You can ask him about it yourself.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180409
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mik,

    1. Who says that it is a good minhag in our day? It originated because Jews were afraid to go outside on that night as Xtians got drunk after hearing fiery anti-Semitic sermons and they were too poor to have sefarim in their homes.

    2. Someone who is mitzta’er is halachically exempt from sleeping in the sukka. This is, of course, subjective. I heard that they are mitzta’er because they cannot feel the or makif (@Neville).

    3. You yourself wrote that this is only the ideal. However, it is legitimate not to do so. This is why someone who forgets “retzeh” in birkat hamazon does not have to go back.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180402
    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, if you rearrange the letters of ????? you get ?????. Learn

    “???? ?????” with mefarshim.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180400
    Avi K
    Participant

    This almost always occurs in monetary matters. In other areas the psokim attempt to show that really the minhag is in consonance with the Halacha. The reason is that a person’s money is his. He has the right to give it away if he wishes. This is extended to communities. By being part of a community one accepts monetary obligations enacted by that community.

    in reply to: Op-Ed: Houston Jews – Rebuild in Israel! #1150175
    Avi K
    Participant

    Yichusdik,

    1. So think what would have happened if they had moved themselves with their know-how and businesses to Israel.

    2. The fact that some people might be exempt from a mitzva (although many elderly people make aliya and the community can take care of them just as well if not better here) does not mean that there is no mitzva. Wold you support a call to keep Shabbat and fast on Yom Kippur? What about emergency personnel who must work on Shabbat and sick people who must eat on Yom Kippur?

    3. Once a week is already a religious fanatic. The fact of the matter is that in Galut the Jews worship foreign gods as stated in keriat shema. Xmas parties, bonuses and tips. Loving their Sundays (as one rav derisively called it, “Shabbat shenia shel galuyot”), etc.

    4. If you think that he is sharp you should listen to a rav who has a strong mussar derech/ Just to give one example, Rav Yisrael Salanter once walked up to a talmid who was davening next to an open window and told him that he was a robber – he was blocking the air (@Charlie). In fact, mussar is reserved for people of whom one has a high opinion (Chavat Yair 152, generally printed after Hebrew editions of “Sefer Chafetz Chaim”).

    in reply to: Can't Eat By In-Laws Who Eat Gebrochts on Pesach #1149935
    Avi K
    Participant

    Zahavasdad, there is one about a fish store that advertised that its fish never ate chametz. A woman phoned and asked what they ate. The owner replied that they ate smaller fish. She asked if they ate them in the water. When he said “Of course” she told him that she was sorry but she was makpid on gebruchts.

    I myself once saw a package of freezer bags that was labelled “glatt”. They were very smooth bags.

    in reply to: Can't Eat By In-Laws Who Eat Gebrochts on Pesach #1149933
    Avi K
    Participant

    ????? ???? ???? ??? ?’ ?? ???? ?

    ??? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ????.

    ???: ??? ????? ??? ????. ???? ??? ??????’ ??????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??? (???? ????”? ?????? ???? ???????).

    ???? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??? ????? ????? (?”? ?????) ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ?? ???? (?????? ?????).

    ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?

    ?? ???? ?????? ??’ ??????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ?”? ???? ???? ??????’ ???? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???:

    ???: ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ???? (???”? ???? ?”?) ???? ????? ??? ???? ????. ?? ????? ????? ??? ????? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ?? ???? ????? ?? ???????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????? (????? ????? ?”? ?????? ??????? ??? ??”? ??’ ????? ??? ???? ?’ ??? ???”?):

    in reply to: Can't Eat By In-Laws Who Eat Gebrochts on Pesach #1149895
    Avi K
    Participant

    MW, so you are making a gezera on a minhag?

    in reply to: Can't Eat By In-Laws Who Eat Gebrochts on Pesach #1149864
    Avi K
    Participant

    MW, you are correct (although it should be pointed out that Rav Yehiel of Paris disparaged it). However, it is also offensive, presumptuous, and frankly just ridiculous for anyone in any generation to look for chumrot on a minhag. Not an issue d’Oraita, not an issur d’rabbanan but a minhag. This is especially true when it comes up against issues like shelom bayit. In fact, I heard that Rav Zalman Baruch Melamed said that he would even go so far as to allow an Ashkenazi eating by a Sephardi to push aside the kitniyot and eat the rest of the food (on Shabbat push aside the non-kitniyot – don’t try to keep a minhag by doing a melacha d’Oraita).

    Unfortunately, this has become a burning issue (someone once said that if “lo tignove” were a chumra on a minhag people would be completely honest) with the machmirs denigrating poskim who dare to rule leniently. The result is that many people decide that they cannot deal with almost everything being labeled “for those who eat kitniyot” despite major questions as to the halachic validity of this statement and decide to jettison the whole minhag.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149817
    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, actually that is doubly problematic as paying a dayan looks like bribery. Apparently, just as having toenim was allowed in stages because of people who were afraid to sue powerful people or who did not know how to argue for themselves, dayanim were allowed to receive salaries so that people would become dayanim. This is especially true in our day when instead of learning for ten-eleven years (in Israel the average is three for “Yoreh Yoreh” and seven-eight for “Yadin Yadin”) someone can go to law school for less (a total of seven years in the US and three and a half in Israel, where it is a B.A.). See the article “?????? – ????” in the ??????????? ?????? ??? on-line.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149810
    Avi K
    Participant

    Health, for your time you get the wage of someone who guards a zucchini garden (???? ???????) – minimum wage. As of July 2015, the federal government mandates a nationwide minimum wage level of $7.25 per hour. That is $0.00201388888 for each second it takes for you to type and post the information (assuming that you know it from memory).

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149808
    Avi K
    Participant

    Sam, why do the losers have to lose sovereignty? Germany lost WW1 but retained its sovereignty – and there are many other examples.

    Moreover, he The term “?????? ??? ?????” could mean that the ????? ??????? ???? will also apply in ??”?. It could also mean that the spiritual characteristics of EY, such as

    ????? ???? ????? ????? will also apply there.

Viewing 50 posts - 2,301 through 2,350 (of 3,463 total)