Avi K

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,201 through 2,250 (of 3,463 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Does Hashem listen to a Prayer of a Goy? #1157599
    Avi K
    Participant

    Lesschumras (BTW, it is “fewer chumrot” as each chumra is important by itself), the vast majority of Protestants accept Trinitarianism. Notable exceptions are the various Unitarian denominations, which do not consider Yoshke to be more than a great teacher or prophet. Even some of those smaller denominations that do not are not purely monotheistic and/or accept Yoske as their god.

    in reply to: Does Hashem listen to a Prayer of a Goy? #1157589
    Avi K
    Participant

    Sam, read it again yourself. For your convenience I will post a link:

    http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14458&st=&pgnum=127 (?”? ????).

    in reply to: Are the Agudah and Rabbinical Council of America Connected? #1157886
    Avi K
    Participant

    That is sad, Joseph. Chazal say that one should acquire a friend because he will point out one’s errors. The Tzemach Tzedek (of Lubavitch) said that the Chassidim owed a debt of gratitude to the Gra for keeping them from crossing the line and Rav Kook added that that is the general purpose of opposition.

    in reply to: Can a bad person create good art? #1158477
    Avi K
    Participant

    Rav Moshe has a teshuva (Iggerot Moshe, Even HaEzer 1,96), which many think is about Shlomo Carlebach, in which he said that songs written by a mumar are like a machine invented by a mumar.

    in reply to: Are the Agudah and Rabbinical Council of America Connected? #1157882
    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, and vice versa.

    in reply to: Does Hashem listen to a Prayer of a Goy? #1157586
    Avi K
    Participant

    Tiawd, the Ran (Sanhedrin 61b) holds that any religion other than Judaism is a”z. The Tzitz Eliezer (14:91; 18:47) paskens like him but Rav Ovadia and Rav Eliashiv were meikal.

    in reply to: Chasan and kallah learning together #1157337
    Avi K
    Participant

    Wrong again, Joseph. Unless there was another famous rosh yeshiva. Rav Tzvi Yehuda Kook married Chava Leah Hutner , the sister of Rav Yitzchak Hutner. BTW, Rva Hutner wasa talmid of the elder Rav Kook and also had cordial relations wiht Rav Soloveichik and the Lubavitcher rebbe. He also encouraged his talmidim to earn academic degrees. Among them were Rav Aharon Soloveichik (doctorate in Law) and Rav Prof. Israel Kirzner (doctorate in Economics). The latter is both a talmid muvchak of Rav Hutner and the chief student of Ludwig von Mises (who interestingly was an anti-religious Jew and was even buried in a non-denominational cemetery).

    in reply to: Does Hashem listen to a Prayer of a Goy? #1157580
    Avi K
    Participant

    RebYidd, there is a machloket between Rambam on the one hand and Rabbenu Tam and the Meiri on the other as to whether shituf is permitted to gentiles. If it is it might not be a problem for them to daven to Yoshke. For us though it is avoda zara. That includes davening to a tzaddik (Gesher HaChaim 2:25 – http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=31172&st=&pgnum=196(?

    Joseph, regarding going into a mosque, google “going into a mosque” and you will find different opinions.

    Zahavasdad, that is a PA lie. The Maharat HaMachpela is a Jewish holy site with a separate area for Moslem prayers.

    in reply to: Chasan and kallah learning together #1157332
    Avi K
    Participant

    Rav Tzvi Yehuda Kook encouraged it in order to build their spiritual connection. Of course, all of the halachot, such as yichud, pertain. He himself learned “Orot” with his fiancee, who was Rav Hutner’s sister.

    in reply to: Does Hashem listen to a Prayer of a Goy? #1157568
    Avi K
    Participant

    GM, nobody’s prayers are guaranteed acceptance. Hashem is free to say “No”.

    Avi K
    Participant

    Abba_S,

    1. What does one have to do with the other? People who participate in violent demonstrations are by definition people who do not care about jail. Most likely they have been there before and are looking forward to reuniting with old friends. Recalcitrant husbands are a totally different type.

    2. I wrote that some husbands are not fazed by jail. In a way they like it as they get rent-free rooms with heat in the winter and air conditioning in the summer (also free). If they are placed in the “Torani wing” they get three mehadrin meals per day (also free), davening every tefilla with a minyan and learning.

    3. That is not the government’s proposal (although it was approved by the Ministerial Legislative Committee, which means that the government is behind it) but a proposal of MK Shuli Mualem (Bayit Yehudi). While her party is a member of the coalition this suggestion is a private bill. This bill has been recommended by the Religious Court System although it actually only affects ten men currently behind bars. While the Committee’s approval means that the AG has approved it I personally have my doubts if it will pass the Bagatz (Supreme Court) as prisoners’ rights to religious freedom are enshrined in law and Court decisions (in one case a court refused to extradite an alleged hit-and-run driver to Florida because eh would not be able to get kosher food without ascertaining if he is actually observant).

    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, what about where he has moved out of his own free will?

    in reply to: Does Hashem listen to a Prayer of a Goy? #1157566
    Avi K
    Participant

    The Noahide World Center has published a siddur for Bnei Noach called “Brit Olam”. If you are interested you can check it out on their website.

    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, if he already agreed on a civil divorce in principle and even more so if he initiated it yes. If he has moved out then he is a mored.

    in reply to: Does Wealth Equate With Happiness? #1157435
    Avi K
    Participant

    Chazal say that a wealthy person is someone who is happy with his lot.

    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, if it is generally known that he is abusive perhaps there is an “anan sahadei”. It could also be that where the marriage is over refusing to give a get in order to extract concessions from her or for spite is a type of violence. Emotional and verbal abuse can be worse than physical abuse. Moreover, if the husband moves out and refuses to fulfill his marital obligations he is a mored and the bet din may force him to give a get. All this is regarding force. The bet din can certainly decide (see SA CM 2) that get refusers cannot receive any benefits of being part of a community such as shul honors. It can also allow publicly denouncing him in order to protect other women.

    Avi K
    Participant

    Abba, according to what I read most husbands agree after one day. For someone who is otherwise normative it it is such a traumatic experience that there is actually an organization that gives white-collar criminals pre-incarceration counseling. However, there was once someone who stubbornly refused and was imprisoned for over twenty years until he died.

    Besalel, the bit about the pigskins is anecdotal and has also been said about the American suppression of the Philippine Moro rebellion over a century ago (and that it worked) as well as the Chechen rebellion and the rebellion in India. Apparently the origin is in a movie called “The Real Glory” starring Gary Cooper.

    Avi K
    Participant

    DY,

    1. The person who must signs that form is the plaintiff. Thus, if the wife is the one who files for divorce she is the one who must sign.

    2. All it says is that the marriage was solemnized by a member of the clergy or the Society for Ethical Culture and that to the best of the signer’s knowledge all barriers to remarriage have been removed. How a secular court would interpret that in light of the Establishment and Free Exercise (f he goes OTD or she becomes a BT and he does not) clauses is a question mark. If it is considered a religious ceremony then it would seem that the same prohibition against required prayers in public schools would apply. It could well be that it will be interpreted to only mean that secular legal barriers have been removed.

    Joseph, for the Chazon Ish’s words see http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14331&st=&pgnum=327

    http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14331&st=&pgnum=327

    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, you misquoted the CI. He is talking about a case where they ordered him to take an oath to divorce her and then beat him in order to force him to keep his oath. Even there the CI is uncertain if the gett is pasul.

    DY, the NY law only requires judges to take into consideration barriers to remarriage when dividing marital assets. Even has First Amendment questions and also creates questions of ?? ????? as the secular court is, in fact, compelling the gett. See “The Plight of the Agunah: a Study in Halacha,

    Contract, and the First Amendment” in the Maryland Law Review (on-line).

    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, the Aruch HaShulchan says (EH 154,18-20 – http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14243&st=&pgnum=638) that the bet din can force a husband who is violent or abandons his wife to give her a gett. I submit that verbal or emotional abuse is in the same category. In fact, it can be worse than physical abuse. As for the CI you cited I will have to see it inside. On the face of it (assuming you quote him correctly and completely) it is very difficult. How is simply telling someone that eh should give a gett force? The nature of force is that there is no choice. Here he has a choice. He can refuse and take the social and communal consequences. Conversely, there is no obligation to give someone a shul honor, invite him for a Shabbat meal, etc.

    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, please cite your sources regarding the power of a bet din. Please also respond to my distinction between compulsion and persuasion (e.g barring him from shul honors).

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158077
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd, those are your opinions. In any case, even if he was an Acharon later Acharonim can pasken like him if they think that he is correct. I already brought that Acharonim sometimes disagree with Rishonim so you apparently disagree with those poskim as well as those poskim who hold that appointing a king is a mitzva kiumit. I disagree with you and apparently you have no answer as you have resorted to an ad homiem argument.

    Zahavasdad, many peoples in their empire had local kings. The Herodians were called kings even though they were subject to the Romans.

    Avi K
    Participant

    Akuperma, all Israeli prisons have “Torani wings”. The Dannemora State Prison in Ny has a kosher kitchen run by a convicted murderer. He also blows the shofar for the Jewish prisoners on Rosh HaShana. As for minyanim, I heard of a prison that has two: Aguda and Young Israel.

    Joseph,

    1. Your assertions regarding 99% of the cases in the news, etc.

    2. The SA is talking about compulsion. A bet din has the right and obligation to pasken according to what they consider just. In monetary cases this is called “pashara”. If they pasken that he should give his wife a divorce and he refuses he is in contempt of court and the bet din may take appropriate action.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158074
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd,

    1. You heard (or remember) wrong. Abarbanel lived two generations before the Shulchan Aruch. Thus he is a Rishon. Anyway, Rambam says that it is a mitzva to appoint a king not an obligation. Giving a get is also a mitzva.

    2. The Gra, the Shaagat Aryeh, the Schach, the Peri Chadash and the Chazon Ish did not accept that. See “??? ???”? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????????” )on-line) for a discussion of this issue.

    3. Yes. That is why He gave limitations. He also gave alternatives.

    4. You still have not answered my kushiyot. Why did it take 355 years to appoint a king? How were the leaders in EY after the Churban called nesi’im and not kings?

    5. See “The Source for Elections in the Torah” by Rav Mordechai Greenberg (also on-line).

    in reply to: Brexit, your view #1156342
    Avi K
    Participant

    The question is whether it is good or bad for the Jews. Is the UK a moderating force in the EU’s relationship towards Israel or not?

    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph,

    1. Please cite your sources for these assertions.

    2. You are misusing the word “mandate”. The proper word is “compel”, which means beating him until he says”rotzeh ani”. No bet din today has the power to do that under any circumstances. However, a bet din does have the power to instruct him that he should give his wife a get. If he refuses it can issue sanctions against him for contempt of court (e.g. no honors in shul). This is not compulsion as he can decide to forego shul honors (for example) whereas no one can accept continual beating.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158072
    Avi K
    Participant

    Actually, slavery in the Torah is demonstrably better than prison. In the former the thief or bankrupt gets to learn how to stand on his own two feet. In the latter he learns how to be a bigger crook. If he is emotionally unable to tolerate freedom he need not commit another crime to go back to servitude. While there was also the eved Kenani, who was not a full Jew, he had many rights, such as Shabbat and Yom Tov. If his master injured him or needed him for a mitzva (e.g. completing a minyan) he went free and became a full Jew.

    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, the implication of the word “recalcitrant” is that a bet din requires him to do so.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158070
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd,

    1. Abarbanel is a Rishon. There is also the statement in the Gemara (Berachot 55a) that a leader must be acceptable to the people. It might even be that they can recall a king (Yerushalmi Horiot 3,2 and Rosh HaShana 1,1 with Korban HaEida and Pnei Moshe there and Responsa Avnei Nezer Yoreh Deah 312,15, Rut Rabba 5,6 but see intro. to “Oneg Yom Tov” )

    2. Who says that one cannot argue with Rishonim if he has solid proofs? See http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/arguing-with-rishonim-and-achronim.

    3. You still have not answered my questions regarding the kings of Israel, bad kings, Hashmonaim and Herodians. For that matter, why was the leader after the Churban always called the Nasi?

    4. How does the Netziv allow a postponement? What if no generation would feel that it needs a king? He does not mention any time limit. In fact, it took 355 years to annoint Shaul.

    5. It is outrageous that you dismiss major poskim with a wave of the hand. You must go to their graves and beg forgiveness with bitter tears.

    in reply to: Gun control #1155916
    Avi K
    Participant

    Ubitquin, according to the US National Library of Medicine “In the United States, 36,110 bombing incidents, 5,931 injuries, and 699 deaths were reported. There were 21,237 (58.8%) explosive bombings, 6,185 (17.1%) incendiary bombings, 1,107 (3.1%) premature bombings, and 7,581 (21.0%) attempted bombings. For explosive bombings with known motives, 72.9% of injuries and 73.8% of deaths were because of homicide. For incendiary bombings with known motives, 68.2% of injuries were because of extortion and revenge, and 53.5% of deaths were due to homicide. Private residences accounted for 29.0% of incidents, 31.5% of injuries, and 55.5% of deaths. Government installations accounted for 4.4% of incidents but were the site of 12.7% of injuries and 25.5% of deaths. In bombings with known materials, nitrate-based fertilizers accounted for 36.2% of injuries and 30.4% of deaths, and smokeless powder and black powder accounted for 33.2% of injuries and 27.1% of deaths.”

    I don’t see how the ingredients in all of these devices can be effectively banned. However, I do agree that sales of actual weapons should be by license as with driving (not that that helps very much either).

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158067
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd,

    1. Rambam says (Hilchot Melachim 1,7) that only David’s kosher descendants can be king. Does that mean that the kings of Israel were not kings according to Rambam (see Sanhedrin 20b Tosafot d”h melech)? What about Menashe ben Chizkiahu? Rambam also says (ibid, Hlalacha 8) that if a navi appoints someone from a different shevet to be king and he keeps the Torah he is considered the king. Does that mean that the Hashmonaim and the Herodian rulers were not kings? If not, how do you define their government?

    2. Abarbanel, the Netziv, Rav Kook and Rav Chaim David HaLevi (“Shilton al pi HaTorah v’haDemokratia”, “Shana b’Shana”, 5758, p.205-213) apparently interpret it differently. I only suggested that according to them the mitzva to appoint a king means a central government and not necessarily a monarch. If you wnat to disagree you can cite opposing sources. However, let us not be neo-Karaites.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158064
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd, you can interpret it. This is done all the time. This is part of Torah shebaal peh.

    in reply to: Gun control #1155909
    Avi K
    Participant

    Avram, actually according to a recent study most murders are executions. The murderer decided that the victim did something that makes him deserving of death. According to the US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics “Almost half of the victims died in fights with the offender arising from property disputes, domestic arguments, insults or feuds. An estimated 11 percent were involved with the killer in illegal drug activities and 12 percent were collaborating in other criminal activities with their killer.” The death penalty might well deter all but the suicidal. At any rate, they will never kill again.

    Ubiquitin, one can kill even more with explosives. Criminals can get either or make it without any problem.

    in reply to: Advice for learning yiddish #1157343
    Avi K
    Participant

    Let the dead language (if it can be called a language and not a jargon) rest in pieces (the different dialects). Learn Chinese. That is the wave of the future.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158061
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd, see http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14388&hilite=e7539dd1-d1d6-46fd-8b6d-66a2c821025c&st=%D7%A7%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A5&pgnum=329. Why should there not be l’chatchila and b’diavad in this mitzva? Really, there should be no need for any type of government. Hashem should be King. That is to say, people should keep mitzvot without compulsion. Forming a government is a tacit admission that the people are not capable of that (Shmuel Alef 18,7). If there is to be a government it depends on how far the people have descended. If the situation is not too bad a republican form of government is appropriate – and this was the case in the autonomous medieval kehillot. If it is worse a constitutional monarchy (the king is subject to the limitations of the Torah as expounded by the Sanhedrin and the nevi’im) is needed. However, this is only if there is a someone worthy of the tremendous powers which a king has (Rambam Hilchot Melachim ch. 3, 8-9). As Abarbanel points out, we see what happened immediately after the death of Shlomo. The bad kings brought Am Yisrael down to the three cardinal sins by example.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158059
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd,

    1. Not at all. Any leader must be acceptable to the public

    (Berachot 55a). If it is an obligatory mitzva why did they wait 355 years? Why did Gideon refuse to be king? Why was Shmuel unhappy with their request? For that matter, Abarbanel prefers a republican form of government and effusively praises the systems in Florence and Venice in his time. According to Rav Kook (Mishpat Cohen 144?14) that any leader accepted by the people has considered a king for his functions it is not a problem. The mitzva is to appoint a national leader. If he is a king he has certain dinim that a judge or nasi does not have.

    2. True. However the number of qualified people today is certainly very large.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158052
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mdd, it is a conditional mitzva. Here is the language of the Netziv (He’emek Devar Devarim 17,14):

    ???, ??? ???? ?? ??? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ????, ??? ‘????? ????? ???’; ???? ???? ????? ??”? ?????? ????? ???! ??? ??, ??? ???? ‘?????’?

    ?????, ????? ?????? ?????? ?????, ?? ????? ?? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?? ?? ??? ??? ????????, ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ?????, ??? ????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ??????, ???? ?? ?? ???? ????? ?? ?? ????? ???, ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???, ???? ??? ?? ???? ????? ????? ????? ???, ?? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ???, ?? ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ????????? ??????? ???? ???? ????, ?? ?? ????? ??? ???????? ????? ???.

    As for David and his descendants, statistically all of us are probably his descendants. Only cohanim and levi’im are definitely not through a continuous line of males. Moreover, Rambam says that a son only inherits his father’s position if he is like him in yirat Shemayim (Hilchot Melachim 1,7).

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158048
    Avi K
    Participant

    Charlie,

    1. That is only if the people want such a system. However, if the people do not positions to be held for life and passed on by inheritance they can set up a system where there are no sarrarot, only public servants (Rav Shaul Yisraeli, Havat Binyamin 1,12 p. 92).

    2. Abarbanel’s problem with monarchy is that he saw it as always degenerating into tyranny.

    3. In the ideal system, which Rambam says will be in place in Mashiach’s time, all these taxes will be paid voluntarily. No need for audits, fines or imprisonment.

    in reply to: Gun control #1155903
    Avi K
    Participant

    Avram, criminals will always find ways to get weapons. They can even make them themselves. Even teen gangs can make zip guns. Moreover, various and sundry implements can be used as weapons for both murder and suicide. This is how Abe Reles became known as “Kid Twist”.

    in reply to: Monarchy vs. Democracy #1158045
    Avi K
    Participant

    Ideally it should be Anarch-Capitalism. Each person under his own vine and fig tree keeping mitzvot because Hashem said to keep them. Practically, it is whatever the people want (He’emek Devar Devarim 17,14).

    in reply to: Gun control #1155892
    Avi K
    Participant

    NYC has one of the strictest laws in the world but that never stopped criminals. Israel has gun control but if one lives in an area or considered dangerous, is/was a reserve office in the IDF and has a clean record one can get a permit fairly easily yet the murder rate is very low, especially when factoring out terrorism, underworld hits and “family honor” killings.

    America has a huge population so statistically there will be more people who go nuts. Also the mentality regarding violence is very important.

    in reply to: So About Nachal Chareidi… #1155444
    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph,

    If they are OTD why don’t they do a regular IDF program? As for being ” dropouts” or “guys with problems” are you admitting that not everyone should learn full-time?

    Just out of curiosity, what is your heter for being motzi shem ra on a whole group of Jews? If you do not have one you must come to EY and ask forgiveness from each NC guy.

    in reply to: Shaking hands with the opposite gender, in Israel #1155577
    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, what if she does not want to cross?

    in reply to: YWN: Gedolim Backed Nachal Chareidi At The Onset, Albeit Quietly #1155714
    Avi K
    Participant

    “Daat Torah” is generally understood to mean that the rav also paskens on non-halachic matters. For example, what kind of car to buy and whether or not to accept the offer of financing deal to by an apartment (some years ago, in a major blow for the idea of DT, a contractor went bankrupt leaving Chareidi buyers who listened to rabbanim and accepted a discount in return for giving up the usual bank guarantees in the lurch).

    in reply to: UN resolution #1155492
    Avi K
    Participant

    Joseph, what is important is that Hashem recognized and continues to recognize it.

    in reply to: UN resolution #1155477
    Avi K
    Participant

    Nothing. The UN is irrelevant. As Ben-Gurion said, Oom (the Hebrew acronym for the UN) schmoom.

    in reply to: YWN: Gedolim Backed Nachal Chareidi At The Onset, Albeit Quietly #1155699
    Avi K
    Participant

    The following appears on the Arutz Sheva English site:

    For months, the haredi officer charged with integrating religious soldiers into the army has endured an unending barrage of harassment and defamation from radical elements within the community opposed to service in the IDF.

    On Wednesday, however, the efforts to force the officer to either abandon his position or leave the haredi community ratcheted up dramatically.

    His wife and children discovered the frame of the front door had been damaged, and that the lock of the front door had been glued, rendering it inoperable.

    They later discovered black paint splashed on the floor of the apartment building near the entrance of their home.

    [paint]

    Despite the attack on their home, the family remains determined not to cave in to the pressure.

    [of vandals]

    in reply to: YWN: Gedolim Backed Nachal Chareidi At The Onset, Albeit Quietly #1155691
    Avi K
    Participant

    No surprise. They have to consider the hooligans in their camp. Even Rav Eliashiv was stoned (after he reached an agreement on moving graves).

    in reply to: Attention Avi K (OK, and everyone else) #1155666
    Avi K
    Participant

    AY,

    1. There is no such obsession. In fact, this will clear outthe dead wood and turn them into live wood in another framework.

    2. If you want to use the Technion example then have the Rabbanut give exams just as the Technion has entrance exams.

    3. As for your fallacious example about appreciating talmidei chachamim, if they have not learned this by age 18 then the Chareidi yeshiva system is a complete failure.

    4. FYI, there is forced conscription. Moreover, some people want to be forced so that they have an excuse. This, in fact, is what American olim do to avoid losing their US citizenship.

    5. What other harangues do you propose?

    in reply to: Attention Avi K (OK, and everyone else) #1155663
    Avi K
    Participant

    DY, almost doesn’t count except in Horseshoes and hand grenades. The fact is that someone who is not cut out to be a talmid chacham will not apply himself. Hashem does not giev out talents and desires for no reason.

Viewing 50 posts - 2,201 through 2,250 (of 3,463 total)