Aseh maat ve emor harbeh

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 70 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should Women Have the Right To Vote? #2327945

    Only women should vote. Men can’t vote because of bittul Torah.

    To all the negative comments suggesting that kiruv isn’t worthwhile anymore: Kiruv is hatzalas nefashos mamash. It’s not a numbers game. If a building collapsed with hundreds of people inside c”v, would we say it’s not worth trying to rescue them because most of them are probably dead already? If course not! We would say that if even one of them can be saved, it’s worth the effort. So too, if even Jewish neshama can be saved, then it’s worth the effort. And there are lots of ways of figuring out if a person is really Jewish Al pi halacha. People whe engage in kiruv regularly have methods that I’m sure they can describe if you’re interested in talking to them.

    Some dems, such as Eric Adams and Senator Fetterman, have been very supportive of Israel’s security. Some Republicans have been less so. Not all Democrats and Republicans are the same. I trust my fellow yidden to use their seichel when they vote this November and come to their own conclusions about which candidate is better in race, without the need for ridiculous threats of cherem from anonymous people on the internet.

    in reply to: Antisemitism in naming hurricanes #2294217

    The hurricane names alternate male and female. The last one was Alberto so evidently Beryl is supposed to be a girl’s name. This shows tremendous insensitivity to all the Jewish boys and men named Berl. I think we should all protest by avoiding any travel to areas in the path of this insensitively named hurricane until it has passed.

    in reply to: Post-debate fallout- question for Democratic voters #2294001

    The time for Biden to drop out was last year. If he drops out now, he has no clear successor and no chance for primary elections to produce a clear successor to his candidacy, so anyone who is nominated at the convention will struggle to be seen as legitimate. Kamala, as the VP, probably has the best claim to legitimacy, but she’s seen as weak and unpopular and probably doesn’t have enough time to change that before the election even if she knew how to. So the Dems at this point appear to have nothing but an array of bad options to choose from.

    in reply to: Why I’m voting for Biden #2294000

    It sounds like you are more concerned about Trump’s reputation than about America’s success.

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2282258

    הרבה שלוחים למקום

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261384

    Avira, I said I wasn’t learned enough to know where to find the Rambam without a citation, which is true. I’m much more interested in hearing your explanation on how to get to the correct pshat in the Rambam than in your guesses about how much experience I have or don’t have in learning (nobody else here cares!). But thanks for the mussar. I really should spend more time learning instead of posting things here.

    Reb Eliezer, good job catching the joke.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261295

    Avira, thank you for posting the source in the Rambam. I notice it says יש למנוע, which means it’s advisable for the husband to discourage his wife from going out excessively, not that it’s mandatory, and not that he should force her, chas veshalom. It’s very important to present halachos correctly, which UJM did not do.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261283

    Ghd, it doesn’t really matter whether times have changed, I’m not convinced that there was ever an inyan at any time in history for a man to require his wife to be confined to her home, as UJM seems to misinterpret the halacha to say (as if such a thing is even possible). There have been (and probably still are) many tzniusdike women who have chosen to stay home when possible, and the Torah may encourage such a choice, but that’s very different.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261132

    I also feel bad for the wives of any men who feel upset when they open a frum magazine and don’t see pictures of other women.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261131

    UJM, I’m actually a man too, but I feel bad for your wife if you’re married. And while I’m not learned enough to know exactly where to find these Rambams and Shulchan Aruch’s that you quote without citing any siman or s’if, I have never heard of any godol b’Yisroel, either in our times or earlier generations, who was known to lock his wife in his house against her will.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261050

    Lakewhut, I have a strong suspicion that you’re a man.

    UJM, I have a strong suspicion that you’re a man as well.

    in reply to: Minister Gallant Assures U.S. No Jews Will return To Gaza After #2258310

    Jews are allowed to live anywhere in the US only if they are US citizens. Jews and Arabs are allowed to live anywhere in Israel only if they are Israeli citizens. Both countries have a right to exclude anyone who is a non-citizen, as does every other country in the world.

    So the real question is whether Gaza is rightfully part of Israel, in which case Jews should of course be allowed to live there, or whether it belongs to “Palestine”, in which case the Palestinians of course should have a right to exclude anyone who is not a citizen or their “country”. It seems that Gallant (as well as the Biden administration) holds that Gaza doesn’t belong to Israel. If you disagree with them, you need to explain why the State of Israel should have sovereignty over Gaza (there are of course many arguments to be made both in favor of or against such a position).

    in reply to: Why is ywm called yeshiva world #2253079

    Since so many of us realize this whole website is bittul zman at best, what are we still doing here? Go grab a gemara! (that question was for myself too)

    in reply to: Chanukah: A Reminder of the Dystopia that Exists in the Frum Community #2245049

    Haimy, I think you’re absolutely correct with respect to most Frum communities. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t cry for the other 10%, though.

    Lakewhut, that’s not how marketing works. If you advertise in a publication that has tens of thousands of readers, then depending on your profit margin, your advertising investment could easily pay off even if just 1% percent of the readers buy your overpriced meat board. If you don’t believe me, look at all the ads in Jewish newspapers and magazines for luxury apartments in Eretz Yisroel. Do you really think more than 10% of the readership can afford to even think about such a thing?

    Every time there is an effort by the anti religious forces in Eretz Yisroel to attack Shabbos, kashrus, the kedusha of the Kosel Hamaaravi, etc, the anti religious leaders warn the government that if they resist, they will “alienate” the Jews of the diaspora, by which they mean American Jews, who they assume to be overwhelmingly secular and liberal. In reality, we know that although the frum Jews are still a minority of Jews in America, we are not a tiny minority like we used to be, and we are much more likely to have visited Israel and care about Jews in other countries (see the 2020 Pew study of you doubt this).

    A large turnout of frum, and especially chareidi Jews at the march could help dispell this dangerous myth, and will בע”ה help our brothers in Eretz Yisroel see that America is full of frum Jews who care about all Jews everywhere and are willing to come to support them.

    in reply to: Jewish Israel #2153297
    in reply to: Jewish Israel #2144115

    A couple questions:

    1) Does the Torah give a Beis Din have the authority to punish people for private behavior, meaning not b’farhesia?

    2) Does the Torah require a beis din to investigate and pass judgment *all* suspected violations of the Torah within its authority (rather than having discretion to enforce where it seems likely to have good results)?

    If the answer to either of these questions is “no”, then it would be incorrect to state that the Torah requires a beis din to force people to be frum.

    in reply to: BLM RIOTS VS. JAN. 6 PROTEST #2097222

    To be clear, I have no love for BLM or Antifa or any of the other thugs, and their actions should not be minimized. But it’s easy to look in retrospect and say that the storming of the capitol was no big deal because only a couple people got killed and the only damage was to public property, when actually we are very lucky that’s all it was. It could easily have been worse, but that outcome was avoided because the capitol police showed restraint against the rioters and got the lawmakers out before they were seriously threatened. History has shown that attacks on centers of government power usually result either in anarchy and violence (Rwanda for example) or in a government crackdown on freedom and consolidation or power (the burning of the Reichstag for example). So while we were lucky in January 2021, I think the potential negative consequences were even worse than those of the BLM riots.

    in reply to: BLM RIOTS VS. JAN. 6 PROTEST #2097163

    Smerel wrote :”Given the choice between the capital riots happening again or the BLM riots happening again I’ll take the capital riots any day.”

    I think you are actually doing the same thing that you (correctly) accuse the liberals of doing, by having a different standard depending on one’s political beliefs. Why do I say that? Because I think if BLM stormed the capitol in January 2017 to prevent Trump’s inauguration, you would agree that it was worse than other riots.

    in reply to: BLM RIOTS VS. JAN. 6 PROTEST #2096619

    Thought experiment: what would have happened if BLM and Antifa rioters had attacked the Capitol in similar fashion?

    in reply to: BLM RIOTS VS. JAN. 6 PROTEST #2096620

    n0mesorah:
    “See the committee for misuse of capitol letters.”

    “Capitol” letters – hahahahaha!
    See the committee for “pun”-ishable offenses.

    in reply to: Global warming #2091783

    Aaq – that’s a good point

    in reply to: Global warming #2091772

    “You don’t know enough about anyone here to be worrying about yeshivos based on their posting.”

    You’re right, actually. I accept that.

    in reply to: Global warming #2091768

    “3. If Torah is eternal and was and continues to be true (which I believe), why do Torah scholars have so much to say about it? Maybe it’s too complicated for me. I am not as smart as I pretend to be.”

    Because eternal and true does not mean simple or easy to grasp. If understanding science requires an inquisitive mind, the Torah all the more so.

    in reply to: Global warming #2091760

    “ujm’s comment confirms that his yeshivah did not do an adequate job teaching science”

    Why do you jump to blame the Yeshivos? Not everyone went to Yeshiva and not everyone who went to Yeshiva took full advantage. And not everyone who learns science gains critical thinking skills to go along with it, and vice versa.

    in reply to: Global warming #2091738

    Yeshivos come in many varieties, but I’m actually more worried about the quality of hashkafa education than the science education in Yeshivos, judging by some of the posts I see here that seem to misinterpret key ideas like Bitachon and hishtadlus and to confuse political concepts with Torah concepts. Before we start worrying about reconciling science with Torah (not reconciling Torah with science, chas v’sholom), let’s first make sure we understand what the Torah actually says.

    in reply to: Is abortion Murder? #2091707

    It sound like maybe the religious beliefs caviat is also about protecting women having abortions before 40 days, where there is more room for leniency in halacha, especially since this was in the context of a law banning abortion from the moment of conception.

    in reply to: Global warming #2091373

    Thank you TS, at first it sounded like you were making an argument based on Torah hashkafa, but you clarified that your belief that global warming is sheker is based on your belief that scientists are dishonest and lest trustworthy than their critics, which whether correct or not, is a political judgment that the Torah does not require one to make.

    in reply to: Global warming #2091117

    Ujm, haha you’re so funny. A won’t even try to match your incredible wit.

    in reply to: Global warming #2091098

    TS Baum, what you say is interesting, but it seems to negate the whole concept of hishtadlus. It’s like as if someone said “Hashem gave us tobacco for us to use in our avoidas Hashem and it would be neglectful not to use it this amazing stuff that Hashem gave us, so I’m going to keep smoking five packs a day and Hashem will take care that my lungs stay healthy just like He has my whole life until now.” On the surface it sounds like Bitachon in Hashem but it actually is not at all what the Torah had in mind.

    in reply to: Global warming #2090700

    “we have much bigger issues right now”

    Your right. Like the type of collars people wear on their bekishes. And flavors of cheesecake.

    in reply to: Global warming #2090682

    I realize my original question may have been unclear because I said “concerned” and people may have interpreted that is meaning “worried”. I agree it’s obvious we should never be worried about anything except serving Hashem (easier said than done, of course)

    in reply to: Global warming #2090681

    I’m hearing a lot of very good arguments for why we should not lose sleep over global warming and should focus on Torah and mitzvos. That should be an obvious given. Of course Hashem runs the world so we shouldn’t lose sleep over global warming just like we shouldn’t lose sleep over war or terrorists or earthquakes or elections.or anything else of this world.

    My question was whether there is a reason, aside from politics, that a frum Jew should take a position on the question of whether global warming is real or a hoax.

    in reply to: Global warming #2090609

    N0mesorah, thank you for telling me that you don’t own property in Miami Beach. Now that I know that, I realize I don’t need to be concerned about sea level rise.

    in reply to: Global warming #2090599

    Baum, I hope moshiach comes a lot sooner and /or it is Bubba maises because 15 degrees Celcius = 27 degrees Fahrenheit = 120 degree summer days in NY and growing bananas in Alaska

    in reply to: Global warming #2090593

    UJM, I’m understanding your argument to be that on the one hand you have goyish liberal media telling us that there is a scientific consensus that global warming is real, and on the other hand you have goyish conservative media saying that actually most of those scientists are liberals who are making things up to further their political agenda, and the rest of them are too afraid to say anything because it would ruin their career. And you trust the goyish conservative media more than the goyish liberal media, therefore you have no sofek that global warming is a hoax. Do I have this right?

    in reply to: Global warming #2090424

    “Dorah, it certainly seems that would be a step up from who you currently consult with or follow.”

    *BEDUM-CHINK* Cheap shot alert!

    in reply to: Global warming #2090408

    N0mesorah, why should people be concerned only for 15 years?

    Anyway it looks like the worst case scenario according to scientists would be about 4 degrees celsius average temperature rise by 2100 with average sea levels rising by about 4 feet. Obviously scientists have been wrong about lots of things and hopefully this is one if them, but if you suppose they were right, a 4 feet sea level rise would be bad news for anyone owning property in Miami Beach, Coney Island, or anywhere by the beach. A four degree C rise in temperature is the difference between the average temperatures for New York vs Atlanta, so it would be noticeable.

    Supposing the scientists are right and the worst case scenario happened, it doesn’t sound like the end of civilization, but it does sound like something it would be good to be prepared for.

    in reply to: Global warming #2090394

    Ujm, that would be a valid reason to have a sofek if global warming is a thing or not. But not a reason to believe 100 percent that it’s not a thing.

    in reply to: Global warming #2090391

    N0mesorah, I don’t understand your question.

    in reply to: Global warming #2090374

    What was Rav Miller’s reasoning?

    in reply to: Global warming #2090347

    Thanks Avira. It sounded like your argument was that we shouldn’t worry about global warming or other environmental problems because Hashem will provide what we need and it is our aveiros that cause problems in the world, not pollution. It sounds like you are saying that hishtadlus is unnecessary because Hashem runs the world. Of course Hashem does run the world, but if you take that argument to its logical conclusion, why bother trying to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, it’s our aveiros that give them power? Or why bother to vote, it’s our aveiros that are causing inflation, not Biden?

    in reply to: Is abortion Murder? #2089658

    I don’t remember but it was discussed in a tshuva from one of the gedolei poskim. Maybe the yaavetz, but I’m not sure. I also don’t remember what the final psak was, but it was not as poshut as it might seem.

    I believe the tzitz eliezer was matir abortions for babies with Tay Sachs if I remember correctly, though this was controversial.

    in reply to: Solution to the Shidduch Crisis #2089642

    Gadolhadofi, it sounds like you might know the gemara better than I do. Please let me know which daf I should be looking on.

    in reply to: Is abortion Murder? #2089595

    “our bubehs and zaydahs* would be infinitely more shocked at the actual discussion that frum jews are having about baby killing. They’d recoil in horror at the shattering of skulls, dismemberment and brutal torture that abortion often entails. And they would scream “murderer!” Without getting into any shailos if it’s *really* murder or not.”

    Possibly, but the poskim in the times of our bubbes and zeidesand even before found it necessary to discuss this question in their shailos and tshuvos, because there are situations where there is a nafka mina. A famous one was a case where a woman knew that she was going to give birth to a mamzer and wanted to do tshuva for what she had done.

    in reply to: Is abortion Murder? #2089577

    On the other hand, there is the idea that when a prohibition is being treated lightly, it’s necessary to be extra strict, so maybe such a law would be a good idea. Tzarich iyun…

    in reply to: Is abortion Murder? #2089567

    Ujm, I would be curious to know what the opinion of gedolei Yisroel would be on this. My guess is that there would be serious practical issues with enforcing capital punishment for a crime that a large portion of society doesn’t consider to be a crime at all. The result might be selective and unfair enforcement. Where it was enforced, political opponents of the law would turn executed offenders into martyr figures. It would be better to work on changing public opinion, from a practical standpoint.

    in reply to: Solution to the Shidduch Crisis #2089531

    Gadolhadofi,

    I think that method was used in only a few exceptional situations, and shouldn’t be taken as an example of how things were done then.

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 70 total)