Always_Ask_Questions

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,101 through 1,150 (of 7,287 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2236904

    How was Avraham able to defend reshoyim of some? R Moshe says that he was interested in truth and ficing the wrings, and not focused on destroying the evildoers. I am not at the level to apply this to those who are trying to destroy us, but at least we need to apply this to each other.

    in reply to: Record number of Jewish gun ownship #2236567

    Ability, a da Raba, schools and shuls should be giving discounts to those who are ready to protect the kehilla. Should count as part of chesed and written off as tzedokah. This is not farfetched: halachik thinking about serving in the tzahal includes an idea that even if one feels protected by his learning, there is a tzad of chesed to protect others.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2236558

    Fanatic, I think that people tend to focus on someone who they often disagree with, and these are often their neighbors with whom they disagree on a particular point. We see it in Israel, among different Jewish groups in US, in politics… maybe this is what sinas hinam is about.

    So, when someone focuses on the enemy, then enemy of my enemy is my friend… avoid falling into this psychological trap, don’t be a fanatic.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2235874

    Gedol, I needled you for a reason (: I do not consider modernishe such a bad word, I just want to make sure that people who think they are not be more realistic. Avraham was modernishe as he (literally) fought wars of his time, not of Noach’s times, and everyone else was similarly modernishe addressing issues of their time, as the Torah says -go to the judge in your gates …

    With erusin, you, similarly to n0, take an example of a social practice with a halachik basis. Same with, kesuba or schools – they changed over time, gemora itself is telling us the history of those changes and social reasons: Rabbis experimented until they found a solution. DT is a fundamental principle of relating to life. If you want to say that this is a new practice that did not exist during gemora because we now need it, ok, I’ll listen to the argument why. But, instead, it is usually presented that “Yaakov was wearing the hat” mebeersheva. Not accusing you personally.

    > I don’t see anything for מפרשים to get excited about.

    So, the student rejects Rav’s advice and halachik argument out of hand without even uttering a word and this is OK? if you come to your ruv and ask his advice for a shidduch, is it OK to reject his advice, especially if it questions Ruv’s yichus? Or is it OK to not even ask? I am trying to put myself in DT shoes, but maybe I am missing the boat (while mixing metaphors)

    in reply to: moving from Jerusalem to Cleveland – TIPS please! #2235875

    I think OH has vouchers, so that should have positive impact on school cost and, hopefully, quality.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2235864

    n0,
    you are comparing DT with philosophical categories. I thought DT is a halachik imperative, thus it needs to have halachik parameters.

    As to your questions – of course, people can and should ask for advice. And Torah scholars should be first on the list.

    in reply to: Why isn’t Everyone a Gaon? #2235855

    While I agree with all caveats ^, we should value all the tools we have. Studious students were at risk of not having children as they could not go to the bathroom and miss part of the class. Chofetz Chaim write that we should thank Hashem for all conveniences, such as inventing trains that made travel fast & comfortable, kal vehomer tools that help learn Torah, from book printing to online search to YWN.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta: Do they have a Point? #2235852

    akuperma, what would have happened with those Yidden in the Jewish autonomy and the other Jews in Arab countries? You might argue that we should disregard their later hate of Jews as it was a response to zionists. Shoin. But simply look at how other minorities, and majorities also, are treated in the surrounding countries. At best, we could hope for a Jordan-type government, where only those Jews who create trouble would be killed. Or, we could have been under a government a la Saddam, Assads, ISIS … At best, most Jews would have left EY for now (like most christians did) and millions would have assimilated by now the way Jews in America did.

    in reply to: Chasing the elusive unicorn #2235503

    This does sound like a good shidduch. It is not late for him to start learning and for her to get off social media. Let her use CR instead. Show them this thread.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2235462

    Gedol,
    on chulin – hope you realize how modernishe your argument is. So, R Yehuda’s DT is not same as ours. How about chesed? shabbos? At minimum, we would need a good source to claim that we can easily reject R Yehuda and inject new meaning into it. Any glosses from the Gaon saying “my DT is different”?
    But I agree that this is a secondary argument just showing shifting positions.

    As to R’ Yohanan, again, they are way more polite than we are and not saying offensive thing to each other’s face (clearly, from silence of RZ). The way I see it – under some of modern views of DT , R’Y’s suggestion should be binding. So, ideally, RZ should come on his own to RY and say, I am looking for shidduch, I don’t trust yichus of Israelis, should I marry a daughter of another student from Bavel or should I go back home? RY would tell him that his concerns about yichus are misplaced and I have perfect shidduch for you, I checked the yichus myself when I was getting married.. Under more extreme versions of DT, RY would not even explain the halocha but say – don’t worry, my daughter is the best for you. Trust me, this is min hashamayim, and you can also inherit the yeshiva.

    This is clearly not happening.

    According to your reading of RY words, he is not even raising his DT rights. According to my reading, he is raising it in a polite indirect way, and supports it by (invalid) halachik argument, and RZ reject it out of hand. In both cases, (lack of) outrage from meforshim is the issue. But maybe I am just not looking at the right places.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2235444

    common > When someone starts a thread by writing “I stand corrected”

    I stand corrected that I thought gemora does not discuss DT, turns out it does (as it seems to me at this point). Now, what gemora says does not seem to contradict my views, as I see so far- r Zeiri politely refusing the shidduch, even after Rosh Yeshiva demolishes student’s unspoken position. And meforshim have simple explanation for this insubordination – not a rav muvhak. I hope I can find more on this.

    in reply to: More Torah being Learned than ever, yet more Troubles #2235439

    > fighting was done overseas

    except many of us or our families were “overseas”.

    While we see a lot of learning, we may be fooling ourselves. When we look at problem of pre-war communities, we see a lot of movement form religion. Nowadays, we might not see it – because some of those who moved away are not even associated with us … During the time of crisis like now, we see some of them – some coming to join, others, R’L – to oppose ..

    look for a Yid who sold them the bridge location

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2235436

    N0, so the first issue this discussion seems to reveal that we do not have same, or clear, definitions here. This is strange. People who keep kosher are able to define what it means. Same with shabbos, each opinion is defined to a minute. So, people who follow DT (and it seems to be the majority here) are not united in what it means. That is, they might be repeating the party line “DT is good, 2 legs are bad” without actually practicing it.

    One article that shocked, shocked, me was a simple YWN news story about R Edelstein emerging from a year of covid isolation and giving a shiur separated by a plastic mehitza from the listeners. Somehow, thru the year of controversy nobody mentioned, or learnt from, the gadol. And no articles about his way of learning during that year (by himself? self-isolating hevrusa? zoom? did not see anything about it). So much for DT.

    PS Rav Yehuda in Chullin had his definition of DT, but nobody seems to care about it. Rav Yehuda founded yeshiva in Pumbedita, taking over from Nehardeya, and most successful and long-serving yeshiva in history – so probably Rav Yehuda knew something about DT …

    in reply to: More Torah being Learned than ever, yet more Troubles #2235353

    R Salanter used to say that when someone is not paying attention while learning in Lita, it leads to a professor in Paris going OTD. So, it makes sense to look at quality of learning.

    First, a simple question of measuring that quality. It was always an issue. During BM2, first attempt at public education was for fathers to teach and that did not have consistent quality (2nd to go to Yerushalaim had logistics problems), 3rd – to teach teenagers in regional centers did not work because teenagers did not listen [quality of teachers, I presume, as it was not an issue in Yerushalaim], what worked – teaching small kids locally, maybe not high quality but giving them information before they are capable of rebelling.

    Som with early yeshivos – I presume Netziv was able to know and lead his 400 students. But in our days, with so many yeshivos, the standards are uneven and are known word-of-mouth among locals. We here inCR are sometimes shocked that some of us are bakiim in certain things and have
    no idea of others. We need some sort of TSAT, Torah SAT with scores in different areas. It is OK to have 800 on tosfos, but 0 on chassidus. This score will accurately describe the student and the school, and then we can start thinking on what can be improved. The fact that we do not have such measurements tells something about the state of learning.

    in reply to: Record number of Jewish gun ownship #2235267

    > The government in medium to large cities in USA have abdicated their responsibility to enforce the law. Crime is through the roof.

    to put it in prospective, crime in NYC is indeed rising for the last 3 years, but was mostly declining from 2000 to 2020.

    murder was 673 in 2000, 292 in 2017, 488 in 2021, 438 in 2022.
    robbery 33K 13K in 2018, 17K in 2022
    grand larceny is the only one that exceeded 2000 – 49.6K in 2000, 51.5K in 2022

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2235118

    So we need to narrow down the definition of dt.. asking for an advice is not controversial, and my DT, who is antidt, gave me advice multiple times on social and business matters without reluctance, sometimes saying: a very interesting case or, this is my advice/opinion not psak. The other rav who is proDT usually answers in a similar language. I am thinking that dt notion is about ravs opinion overrides yours and maybe even known facts, but I’ll leave it to others to define it

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2235115

    Gedol, I understand what you are saying. I was going in the opposite direction: starting with gemora references and trying to understand what gemora means by dt, rather than trying to backfill our modern notion into the gemora. That’s for Chulin

    For Kiddushin, r Y appears to appeal to dt. Note that both of them are respectful and polite, not using cr language. R Z is expressing his devotion to the teacher by carrying him, and his disagreement to the shidduch by silence and avoidance. R Y explicitly put Torah and daughter in the same sentence, that means he leans on his Torah authority. He also reconstructs R Z halachik thinking about yichus and explains why it is wrong. As gemora mentions the teacher is having a memory lapse here.
    Maybe, my guess, because it is personal to him or because he holds strong opinion about EY, not fully letting another student to go meet the crazy mother arriving to Bavel… I am surprised I didn’t see more meforshim on this …

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234987

    provaxx, thanks for bringing up this story. Seems to be R Salanter’s explanation. It is, of course, to assign benefit to such sincere people, as common also says, not proposing an educational system where information gets corrupted.

    Papuniya seems to be a somewhat shady place – if you teach there about benefits of having Satan in the world, he comes and kisses your feet; mikva is allowed during the day because of bandits at night; Great R Aha b’ Yaakov who taught there would shecht a mazik in the abandoned yeshiva building ….

    What else can we learn from this R Masna’s lecture? Maybe “know your audience”? If Papunians are not versatile in Hebrew, teach them in Aramaic? Note that it was not one naive student, but all of them.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234986

    common, I was not interpreting something wrong, I just foun a gemora relevant to the subject and offered you for your thoughtful analysis.

    to your point, this is admirable, although you still have some criteria who is recognized as DT, right? both in hashkofa and level of knowledge.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234890

    Gedol, I don’t see how your midrash about etza is related here

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234889

    Gedol, I think gemora is relevant and it gives the definition of DT that worked for amoraim. It seems to mean here a certainty in a conclusion that is supported by explicit torah sources rather than an uncertain logical supposition about how Yaakov and the malach were embracing… the apparent fact that some modern people use the expression differently is their problem, not gemora’s
    Not insisting on my understanding here, there are more perishing on daf 91 including Chasam Sofer …

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234888

    RebE, I think you are saying that for a real talmid chacham, there is only Hashem’s agenda, not his own kavod, thus he is included into yiras Hashem, no es required. Nice.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234887

    Common, I Stam found a reference that goes against my previous claim and now happy to discuss implications. Gemora is no chainik. You seem to be unable, or unwilling, to accept any torah statement unless it agrees with your preconceived ideas. You might hold at the lofty madregah that you can easily explain all esim in the whole tanach without any hesitation.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234886

    Ubi, this is not just a Stam shadchan,
    r Zeiri is learning from r Yochanan in EY, presumably traveled is there to learn from him …and r Yochanan specifically claims daas torah rights after the student demonstrates his respect. So far, I don’t see gemora or commentaries condemning the student, only explaining that this is not rav muvhak situation…

    in reply to: When will Netanyahu accept responsibility #2234570

    Chaim, you seem to look at things from political point of view. This is currently a military situation, requiring experience and dedication. You seem to casually compare a prime minister with wealth of military and political experience at highest world level with someone who bio seems to consist of being a lawyer and a politician.

    same for BY1212, you do not address all previous successes that Bibi had. Just think of current muted reaction by most moderate Arab countries – that are due to improved relationship under Bibi/Trump that Bibi worked on for a long time. I mention just the recent events, skipping things lioke post-Oslo that may have happened before your bat/r mitzva.

    in reply to: Israel is going to do nothing #2234568

    There are no easy solutions here. Hopefully Israelis (both IDF and politicians) find the right choice/ trade-off between a need to retaliate harshly and a danger of loss of lives and escalation… one thing people should avoid is pushing decision-makers into a public-opinion boxes in either direction. Hopefully, they make decisions based on sober analysis rather than emotional/political pressure.

    For example, it is easy to say that harsh response will regenerate deterrence (at a tremendous cost). But, maybe, a limited operation showing destructive capabilities combined with stronger allied support, will also work? Would someone be pressured to go on offensive to placate supporters or silence opposition? Let’s think how to reduce this pressure.

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2234553

    > One cow in Palestine is worth more

    I don’t think anyone disagrees that there were a lot of things wrong among the Zionists, as well as many non/anti-Zionists of the time (to include bundists, communists and all other isms and parties of the time). I presume if you lived during BM2, you would be against BM because of tzedukim there ..

    Akin to cherems on Chasidim, we probably need to look at what is happening now, and also trace current ideas, both positive and negative, to the previous ones. The only difference between 2 issues is that more time passed after Besht than after R Kook, so it is hard to have a fresh look.

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2234555

    One ideological problem with 1920s yishuv was their insistence on agriculture and, related, land acquisition. Sochnut centralized all donor funds and directed to those ideological goals. As a result, there was less industry development (in tel Aviv area) and industry had capacity to provide livelihood. As a result, many non-ideological Yidden did not come before it was too late as there were no jobs available.

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2234559

    ujm > Now never mind how R. Teichtel decided he can judge the world and decide whether they deserve Moshiach or not;

    thanks for extend quotes from the book as well as your commentary. I think you under-estimating impact of the tragic events that were happening at the time – you dismiss them as irrelevant to halakha. Instead, maybe give credit to someone who was responding to events in real time, whether he was always correct or not, in your opinion.

    From what you quote, obviously, he is talking from the position of these events that Munkachever, and many others, did not fully foresee. For an example, when R Yochanan b Zakai establishes Yavne – is he contradicting his teachers who upheld Yerushalaim, just because of a little fact that Romans destroyed the latter? same here, he is trying to interpret his Rebbe in light of the events.

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2234551

    DaMoshe > somejew: for your second point, the two items aren’t mutually exclusive.

    Indeed, Ramban to Gen 26:29 describes that Avimelech is fearful of Yitzhak because both Avraham and Yitzhak were rav koach with 300 armored men (hm, Eisav would have 400) and many allies – so doing both warfare and politics – in addition to limud and kiruv. And Ramban concludes with Maase avot asu banim – applying to Itzhak, but no doubt, we should also take that to heart.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234549

    Avira > It’s mainly chasidim who approach tzadikim for advice in business, and the baal hatanya was against this, because money is totally bidei shomayim.
    Daas Torah is seeking the Torah’s guidance in life decisions …

    This may not be the only position, I think. I see 2 issues here
    (1) specificity – you somehow separate a decision on what job to take v. stock to pick
    (2) logic – are you asking for a binary output, outsourcing decision-making, or are you asking for information that you can process and use in your decision-making.

    Take, for example, IM CM 2:18, where R Moshe refers to his position to not let kollel members to smoke into faces of other members as “daas Torah” and “clear halakha”. First, it is a very specific issue, 2nd, he lists his arguments – geroma b’nezikin, even if the other is instanis, and even if one smoker is insignificant in the total.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234548

    sqrt, Gedol, thanks for the reference to Chulin: it is even a double one – daas – daas Torah! It looks like it means here that R Yehuda uses logical explanation, that is DT is application of sevorah.

    Of course, my Teacher referred (tongue-in-cheek) to Encyclopedia Talmudit – this discussion was before Gemora was online, and he referred to earlier times when the Volume with Dalet just came out, 1980s? so, pre-Netscape and even pre-gopher times …

    So, if my source was not aware of this Chulin reference (that probably proves his point) is comparable to R Yohanan apparently forgetting a baraita from R Eliezer that Ezra cleaned up Bavli’s yichus (mods, gemora says that, not AAQ, please …) and, thus, presumably, R Zeiri is correct rejecting DT-based shidduch …

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234544

    > Welcome to the Torah world – we’ve been waiting for you

    > does that mean you are ready to apologize for your belittling them

    Gedol is ahead of you guys, as he shrewdly noticed, R Shimon Amsuni is at the end correct.

    Somehow, you got excited about DT mentioned in Gemora, while you failed to actually look up the sugya and think what does it say about DT .. I am not pushing my own opinion here, interested to hear yours.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234534

    Gedol,
    we seem to agree on Shimon Amsuni, I view him as a paradigm of real learning despite his obscurity, even his name is in doubt, despite his thick thesis on esim. There are several great explanations about R Akiva’s addition on Talmidei Chachamim to “yeras Hashem”. The one I like the best is that obviously a baki like R Shimon saw this as a possible answer, but preferred to forfeit his life work rather than saying something that he did not feel 100% correct (or maybe self-serving). So, R Akiva’s answer is based on seeing R Shimon’s behavior – that such T’Ch can be included in “yeras Hashem”.

    This actually gets back to the DT topic – giving a pretty high standard for the DT, not just someone who leared a lot, but someone with impeccable middos, but it is probably assumed in the ideal notion of DT.

    in reply to: Daas Torah in gemora #2234526

    ubi > maybe I’m not sure what daas Torah is, suggesting a shiduch is daas Torah?

    I’ll leave a precise definition to the DT proponents, don’t want to mess that up.
    here r Yohanan is the godol hador and he tells you this is a good shidduch, would you not listen?! and to add to that – his own daughter …

    And – AAQ adds – R Yohanan modestly talks about his beauty and sits near mikva, and Resh Lakish agreed too re: R Yohana and his sister – so chances are that the daughter was also not ugly.

    but all that would be just a deduction, but listen to R Yohana himself: Zeiri carries him over a puddle, proving how much he respects RY as a teacher – and RY says: so my Torah is dear to you, but not my daughter? So, a direct appeal here that Zeiri’s learning should make him agree. Commentaries wax poetic about student as a son, spiritual v. physical yerusha, but I don’t see yet direct answer. I see that RY is not rav muvhak (Zeiri probably learned in Bavel before going to Mitzraim and then EY). Do you see anything relevant?

    Even more ironic is the apparent reason Zeiri refuses – yichus in EY is not good enough for this Bavlian. He does not say so, but RY and Gemora presume it. Is he hinting that gedol hador is sofek mamzer or eved or something like that?! hard to understand.

    in reply to: Did Russia warn Ukraine before attacking? #2233940

    I was not happy about people in our communities being insensitive to the suffering of others, but now when essentially the same war came to us, and same uav models bomb Ukrainians and Israelis, this attitude borders on insane.

    Many Israeli politicians took such position based on real politik considerations and it was understandable, although looks mistaken at this point. But any other person who entertained the notion that we could look calmly at cruelty to others nearby, probably is reconsidering right now and the post ^ is an exception.

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2233918

    It seems that a Persian hackr broke into a esteemed poster’s account and besmerched our heimishe anti zionist with bad Russian spelling and geography.
    This silly person probably doesn’t know between lviv and lemberg

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2233917

    Silly Sephardim listened to zionist propaganda instead of staying
    in peace in Aleppo, Damascus, Tehran,

    in reply to: Message from Rabbi Eli Shulman of YIM #2233674

    funnybone, chochom lomed mikol adam?
    and Kiddushin ~70 daf yomi talks about a cherem for someone who goes to another town and does not show verbal respect to the Rav there

    PS in my town, everyone came together in one shul to daven for refuah, shevuyim, chayalim, regardless of what they usually do intheir shul.

    in reply to: When will Netanyahu accept responsibility #2233544

    We here don’t fully appreciate what Israeli security apparatus is against. We are not often even aware about threats that were eliminated. Every army gets a share of political and bureaucratic leaders during prolonged peace time. As always happens, during a crisis, these really hapless officers will be quickly dismissed from inside.

    Bibi lead country thru very difficult times often paired with a US administration that wasn’t helpful. He isn’t reflexive pro war person, as evident by his peace agreements when he had support from US administration. As to political distractions, his opponents are as guilty if not more, and if they call for political changes now, that is even more suspicious. I would trust more the opposition figures who joined the unity government.

    in reply to: Frum women and hats #2233530

    Okok, I didn’t mean to attack blonde Jewish Americans.
    Maybe someone in town can conduct an experiment Counting
    blonde prevalence on two sides of the mechitza, with and without wigs. Ctl, bshaa tova

    in reply to: Frum women and hats #2233384

    Ctl, I could still be at the same count, if you are the senator’s younger brother. Explains also why jews went so blonde in US, especially women

    in reply to: The final word on Moshiach from the meisim (hopefully!) #2233108

    sechel, you need to stop for a second and organize your education. You quote things left & right, but then before you never heard of major gedolim, now you never heard of major historical figures 100 years ago. So, you hope that you can convince people about what will happen with the world, while you don’t know what happened in that world in both physical and spiritual domains. I would even ask – if you care so much about Hashem’s ways – why not study what was already revealed in history before speculating about mysteries of the future.

    in reply to: Frum women and hats #2233109

    I know of only one man in politics who recently used a wig to be in public. Most other men wear something on their head, with a minority not wearing anything at their jobs. If wigs were so coo, there would be more men using them.

    in reply to: Israel and Palestinians trade blame for hospital explosion #2233103

    whatever we are saying, Arab propaganda news is continuing with the story that (a) Israel bombed the hospital, (b) Israel is now lying about it “as usual” … at some point, their “news page” showed both articles with the above theory and a lesser version that Iron dome hit the incoming missile and parts fell on the hospital.

    On the facts, the question is – what actually exploded? probably, explosives that were kept in/under the hospital

    Pn propaganda, I am afraid but it may be very effective on arab population that will continue to be inflamed and outraged.

    in reply to: Frum women and hats #2232527

    100 years ago, I think, hats were in vogue and sheitels were considered not tzanua.

    Maybe you can talk to poskim and explain your arguments that they may not be fully aware of. If a posek agrees and his wife comes out in a hat, the issue should be solved.

    in reply to: Is there a Drug Problem in the “Frum World”? #2232528

    the question is not only prevalence in a community, but also whether it is addressed properly. In general, insular community tend to keep things under the rug and sometimes preventing treatment and making family members suffer.

    in reply to: “Are you Gri’bben” #2232188

    I recall posting a bunch of factual questions about r Kotler, r Moshe, r Feinstein, not sure whether internets, ate them or mods considered them too hard
    Probably internets, mods would spare at least some

    in reply to: Seminary help! #2232187

    Consider taking some time to learn your father’s minhagim… if you stop some of your chumros, he can afford to spend some time with you and fulfill the suggestion to teach kids between 17 and 22. At the same time you can get a pt job to pay for the seminary of your choice.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,101 through 1,150 (of 7,287 total)