Always_Ask_Questions

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 6,751 through 6,800 (of 7,287 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anti-Face Mask YWNCR #1954621

    DY >> when you have a shul where 90% of the people have had Covid, and the other 10% are spread out

    if you have 90% of people who were sick, you were doing something wrong.

    >> claiming all these rabbonim are being fed

    It is possible to be aware of information and still telling their followers not to take certain measures. Biggest motivation would be thinking that their community will be severely damaged by lack of shuls, schools, all institutions they spent years building. One Rav I heard early in Corona on focused his very emotional speech (on the phone) mostly about dangers of Internet. The extreme example of pursuing this protection was an official document that hinted that healthy people should go get tested to reduce the positivity rate, so that the government stops bothering us.

    Still, this public position does not take responsibility away from individuals. If you think that you can survive some challenges, why wouldn’t you try to keep someone, including yourself and your family, safer? It seems like your [SAD] excuse might be that you live in such a community where everyone is getting positive anyway. If this is indeed so, and not rhetorical, you should all sit on the floor and discuss why you all let that happen.

    in reply to: EXPLAINER: Covid Regulations Post-Vaccine #1954624

    Current Israeli numbers for over-50s: -80% of haredim and Arabs either recovered or vaccinated (at least once, I think), and 98% of the rest of the country. Almost all people currently in hospital are those who were not vaccinated (include younger ones)
    So, this may be a forecast for similar numbers in some pockets of Israeli community – a minority of 20% has to be convinced

    in reply to: Nadler comments in Congress (Here we go again…) #1954622

    Charlie:
    [Adams] Furthermore the religious education you mentioned was Puritan. Had their been any Jews in Massachusetts back then, we would have had to pay taxes to support the Puritan religious schools, as were Christian minorities .. Adams would die in 1826 and Massachusetts would finally distablish its Puritan Church (by then, largely Unitarian in the eastern part of the state) in 1833.

    Their logic was that religion is required to teach morals. As you are saying, there was a machloket whether there should be only a public Puritan church, or others can register too. As you mentioned it was resolved… If we were to pay taxes to support Puritan ministers – and have a right to have our own, this would not be much different from current situation, where we pay taxes to support government schools, and then open our own.

    >> The first Jewish religious congregation would not be started until 1842. Like every other Ashkenazi congreatation in existence in the US at that time that has survived, it is not orthodox.

    Well, you are cancelling Sephardim, like Puritans were cancelling Catholics 🙂

    in reply to: Shabbos clothing #1954612

    The next line in Shabbat 12a talks about shaking clothes looking for lice at night on Shabbat. I am not a lice expert, but it seems if you just put on fresh clothes before shabbat, you would not need to take them off immediately.

    In our days, many people wear what we would consider shabbos clothes the whole week. So, they have another problem – when they touch wine of havdala on their clothes, the bracha never gets to their work clothes.

    in reply to: How do airlines ban customers? #1954597

    CTLawyer,
    >> My flying time on business is working time. Coach class on a budget airline does not have the space and quiet conducive to my work.

    yes, I do the same. Just in that case, it would involve staying overnight at the client’s expense and missing driving kids to school in the morning.

    I once felt very guilty going on a redeye, while my wife was dealing with a newborn. I had to ask myself, do I really dare to enjoy several hours of sleep, and that made me feel even worse? Hashem took care of my guilt feeling. A Chinese father or grandfather was flying with a small baby and signing a very annoying “niggun” the whole flight again and again. I presume this was Eliahu, as I never saw anything like that again in my life.

    in reply to: Anti-Face Mask YWNCR #1954594

    maedaliyah> That either we never wear masks or we always do?

    I agree. I would start with – whenever governor of your state mandates it, and when other people expect you to do it, such as in the stores, offices. It is also not an only choice. “wearing mask” became a short-hand for this madness. There are lots of other decisions you can make. for example, not too fly for a vacation on Spirit this year, limit other optional things and find appropriate, or even better, substitutes, such as learning Torah, gaining a profession, spending more time with yor spouse and kids. I would presume that, for example, Vilna Gaon, would not need to wear mask much, as he rarely ventured out of his house.

    in reply to: Anti-Face Mask YWNCR #1954593

    DY, so if your respected Rabonim do not object to people wearing masks, what stops people from wearing them.

    I am sure there are some kids that need to be in school. At the same time, there are a lot who could benefit from being more with their parents. As a thought experiment – is there ONE class you’d like to learn together with your kids? Humash? Alef Beis? Science? Math? Gym?

    Most of my kids switched to online schools pre-Corona. They are both at school and at home. They, as I, rarely wear masks.

    There is a difference between online schools and regular schools trying to do online and hybrid. The former saw no changes except longer enrollment lines. The latter, yes, struggle sometimes despite best efforts, although CTLawyer seem to report that his family is doing fine, reporting progress, relative to in-person, similar to ours. The main mistake schools made when trying to be online is frantic attempts to replicate in-person experience with everyone hanging over magic zoom. the right way is to give students well-prepared work, with online tests, and teachers focusing on lectures and follow up with students.

    I think the most frustrating thing for parents to see is when kids do not study or misbehave, but you need to realize that things were not better at school, it was simply out of your sight. Frankly, if you think, you have to be a very bad parent to match influence of tens of wild kids that your children are encountering daily.

    in reply to: Federico German Klein = NOT Jewish appears #1954591

    >> @akuperma are you trolling?

    He is, unfortunately, right in certain circumstances. In some corners of Jewish society, more than 50% of people are intermarried. Thus, having a non-Jewish last name increases a chance that the mother is Jewish (unless you are talking about several generations of intermarriage).

    I presume this joke was posted here 4 years ago: what is the difference between Donald Trump and a Reform Jew? His grandchildren are Jewish.

    in reply to: Israeli vs. American hand shmura matzo #1954590

    >> “There are obviously enough people who are willing to and able to pay a huge premium for matzos they like better.”
    > I am one of those people

    That would only apply to people who do not get public assistance or tuition reduction beyond the full cost (not full price that may include subsidizing others)

    in reply to: Shabbos clothing #1954588

    At the time of Mishna, some people would have one set of clothes, including talit

    in reply to: Anti-Face Mask YWNCR #1954412

    DY,
    you are saying that you observed someone not being careful. Not sure – not wearing mask? under what conditions? Does it mean you have to follow him?

    Ask your Rav if you are allowed to wear mask
    Ask your Rav if you are allowed to make your minyan safer – mask, SD,
    Ask your Rav if you are allowed to make your children and teachers safer by some days keeping them at home and teaching them

    in reply to: orthodox Jewish democrat? #1954410

    Er>>The last thing we want is an efficient system of government like the right wing governments Germany and Italy had

    Exactly. Italians seem to realize their mistake and they change their governments pretty often. Israelis are trying that too… Could you imagine if either of extreme Israeli parties were in the firm control of the government for 4 years?!

    In American system, gridlock is, of course, part of the design. Only items that substantial groups agree to will pass. The danger is the Polish Seim experiment – each member had a veto power and eventually nothing passed, until the country declined and was partitioned by neighbors. Now, suddenly nobody had a vote …

    Also, part of the frustration and fight for Presidency is atrophy of local and Congressional democracy. Why do we need feds to decide minimal wage and order of vaccination? Why do we need Presidents issuing EOs when Congress could make a law.

    in reply to: Anti-Face Mask YWNCR #1954405

    Re: position of Rabbis

    I think you need to separate what the Rabbis prescribe as public policy and your personal responsibilities. The Rav may see that if people will stop going to a minyan and children will stop learning in a usual way, the community will disintegrate like happened with previous generations.
    And he may be ready to risk his own life to continue teaching.

    Does it mean that you are not ALLOWED to do what you can to save life and health of people around you, including that Rav?! Let’s clarify that, see below. And if you are allowed, then why wouldn’t you?

    Could someone please ask one of these shailos of Rabonim that are pro-opening their communities, or maybe you already asked:

    – are you allowed NOT to fly to a Florida vacation?
    – are you allowed to wear a mask at the minyan?
    – are you allowed to keep windows open during the minyan? if shul would spend extra money on heat, are you allowed to give tzedokah for that amount?
    – are you allowed to take one day a week off work and teach your children Torah instead of sending them to school?
    etc, etc

    in reply to: Anti-Face Mask YWNCR #1954400

    DY: These rabbonim are paskening that there is no chiyuv to wear a mask

    did you hear this first hand? did you ask to clarify – where and under what conditions?

    could you please ask the Rav you asked whether it is MUTAR to properly wear a mask under different conditions, such as in the airplane when required, in federal buildings, where it is required, in the offices, where you can be fired, in the stores, in the street, where people see that you are Jewish?

    If not, this would mean that this ISSUR to wear a mask is comparable to ISSUR of avoda zara.
    Maybe he meant only the masks that have avoda zora painted on them?

    in reply to: Anti-Face Mask YWNCR #1954349

    I have to admit, I feel very bad reading this thread.

    I am arguing for wearing masks and people are saying it is hard on them (or on some others). I don’t know how to respond, as I rarely wear a mask myself.

    in reply to: Dr Seuss: anti-Jewish and anti-Black racism #1954334

    Dr Seuss and other gedolim of English anbd History are being taken out for a reason:
    to make space for new programming. Public school programs add new diversified program into schools.

    As Dr. Seuss is for younger kids, that means that even elementary school is under attack. Expect new generation of AOC-like people growing up.

    ISIS used a similar strategy in Syria and Iraq: several years they were allowed to run a quasi-country, they were taking young kids into their schools, teaching them a terrorist curriculum, and in 2-3 years they matured into well-trained young terrorists.

    in reply to: orthodox Jewish democrat? #1954289

    It looks like we are not capable of discussing politics in a kosher way, so maybe we can talk about baseball instead?!

    A witness is pasul, if he lies in one aspect of the case, right? Most people here implicated themselves by throwing in false statements borrowed from some cable or newspaper rags. Based on that, we are all not to be believed.

    And what is the point of repeating those sources anyway? Can we have a better conversation about this? This is, after all, being watched, recorded, indexed, and searched.

    in reply to: Nadler comments in Congress (Here we go again…) #1954288

    New Englanders, like John Adams, felt that State should care about religion and religious education, requiring towns in MA to pay salaries to preachers. He, and others, felt that society needs morality. So, it was not about having trees or menorahs at town halls, but about having middos.

    The controversy was whether they should all be from the most popular sect, or could local hasidim redirect payments to their own shtibles. Interesting, this is about the times of Vilna Gaon and Chasidism controversy. Adams was definitely a Litvak….

    I think we all agree that we benefit from US gov not running a church, but does it mean that we support excluding G-d from public sphere? “Sorry, G-d, we find it easier to do Your Will if we keep it quiet somewhat”? This seems like throwing the baby with the water.

    in reply to: How דוד המלך Stopped a Deadly Plague #1954286

    Counting is not just to assess the value, it is also for the purposes of Army draft, taxes (Mas), including sending workers as a tax. Megilla starts and ends with taxes, so that got to be important.

    What would the be modern equivalent? not just a census, but maybe an election? Don’t do elections for no reason just to re-assess your power?

    It is to David’s credit that he moved to Teshuva. He could have said that extra 100 people a day is not that much. They might have died from a heart attack anyway.

    Interesting,ly Israel had highest number of niftarim during this whole pandemic – 101! – on Jan 20 (blame Biden?), the only day over 100. Population now and then look similar. David counted 1.3 mln fighters, so 6-7 mln people

    in reply to: How do airlines ban customers? #1954283

    common,
    maybe I misunderstood you. You said – you were fully complaint (using your common saychel) and nobody bothered you. So, that seems liker a proof that they would not bother complaint people. Others were not and they were told so. I don’t see why you would not support this. “Partially complaint” is a subset of “non-complaint”. What makes you feel that rules are suggestions, and people expect to comply after a couple of reminders? Note that you are making an occasional trip, the airline personnel is in the air a lot at the mercy of non-compliant passengers. Their risk is pretty high. You should be telling other passengers to comply in order to protect the people who enable you flying.

    A statistical aside for your decision-making: having a non-compliant person is a higher risk than simply a difference between him having a mask on or off. Presumably, the person is non-compliant in other places also, so he is a much higher risk. He might have just came from a 1000-people wedding in corona-central. So, if you have a minyan and a guy like that shows up, lowering his nose under the mask does not lower the risk. Maybe chachamim used a similar approach defining Haverim in regards to Tumah? Haver is someone who is careful at all times not only when you interact with him, and thus you can rely on him.

    in reply to: How do airlines ban customers? #1954279

    common, thanks for the invite. I’ll walk. Or drive.

    Btw, if you feel pressured in business, you can try resisting and be surprised by the response. I was on a business discussion, where several subs, some pretty significant, us the smallest, were invited to fly in and integrate/test their software. All parties did not hesitate to show enthusiasm and started discussing the trip (maybe because many of them would send their subordinates). At my turn, I said that we care very much about them and their project, but do not have high desire to see them right now in person, but will do if this is really needed. Everyone laughed and the online deliveries were arranged soon thereafter (for everyone).

    in reply to: How do airlines ban customers? #1954276

    Mr. CtLawyer. Not calling you to fly Spirit. You could still say thanks for the rest of the Jewish people. Also, without Spirit, you would not get a chance to brag about your fancy travels! I proudly flew Frontier for $40 on business, saving the client’s money, not that they cared or noticed. The alternative was to stay till the morning, bill for a nice hotel. I decided it would be a good musar for myself to do what I would have done if I were paying on my own. I was the only one in a suit on that red eye, everyone else weared T-shirts.

    One of the reasons was probably because I had an un-fortune to attend a learned class about business halakha. The speaker discuss a lot of proper humrot in dealing with the opposite sex and drinks in non-kosher places, and then some kulot in dinei mamonot, such as – can you bill 2 clients for the same trip when you visiting them both, or can you bill your company for fedexed kosher food, if it was delayed and hotel reimbursed you. He did not allow much after some pilpul. After than a local Rosh Kollel interrupting with “sheker sheker tirchok”, the talk was successful. So, maybe I took Frontier to get those possibility off your mind. Highly recommend to everyone who had non-kosher business thoughts.

    in reply to: Foolish Democrats #1954272

    coffee, great, we are on the same page re: general numbers. Now, what is your point – it is too insignificant to bother? Again, count number of Talmidei Chachamim who passed away from that. That communities will not take care of their most revered members is beyond understanding. I am especially aghast at the passing of R. Twersky Z’L. I presume he understood the situation with his medical background. I know he is wheelchair-bound, so at the mercy of people around him…

    in reply to: Foolish Democrats #1954252

    Syag, you are describing your feelings of frustration very vividly, but you are not saying what do you disagree with. In person, I would be able to follow your raised eyebrows and know exactly what you mean. It is not working online. Maybe you can either express your thoughts, or make a video while reading my post and attach to your post.

    The reason I am interpreting your text is to find the hidden meaning. There are people dying and you are saying – no, not in our community, so, it does not matter. I am just trying to respectably square your words with reality. It would much simpler for me to ignore, believe me. so, please do not blame me for trying to understand your point of view.

    in reply to: Foolish Democrats #1954107

    Syag,
    > You estimate wrong.
    maybe we are not using the same definition of “community”. I mean broader community of 1000s people. Are you saying that among 50 people in your shul several got sick and all survived? Quite plausible. If you are in NY area, the death rate is 0.3%. That is, 3 people per thousand. The chance that everyone survives out of 50 people is 0.997^50 = 86%. If you are approaching herd immunity, your death rate will be 3x= 0.9%. Still, 50 people have 64% chance to have all survivals. Someone in another shul may not be so lucky. Overall, if your claim is correct, there are 6 more people dead out of every 1,000.

    So, thanks, I think we see where our different views come from. This virus is indeed confounding human intuition, as any “rate event” does. How often do we see people dying when crossing the street? most – not often. Why do many people still obey traffic laws – a combination of seeing cars coming, being trained over time, and police fines. Imagine that cars are invisible, cars come rarely, and there are no fines. Just, once in a while, someone who is crossing on a red light starts coughing within hours of crossing the lights and gets sick. Will it be easy to make people obey the traffic laws? Probably not. Some will attribute sickness to randomess, others to their lack of tzniyut, others will say – it is just 1 in 1,000, not a big deal.

    in reply to: Foolish Democrats #1954106

    for a coffee addict, the cup is always more than half full!
    The disease is highly contagious, so 10% of all senior citizens is a lot of people … How many people are in Moetses and how many niftarim? this is the rate you should be worrying about.

    This is what Romans called “decimation” and it used to keep armies in compliance. The similarity to this barbarity is striking – under decimation, those who got the short stick were clubbed by the lucky ones.

    in reply to: orthodox Jewish democrat? #1954097

    There are so many factors behind virus statistics: variants are different, population distribution by age and diseases, genetics, population density, connections and pure randomness have an effect.
    it is really hard to make attributions unless you have direct cause-effect connection, like putting infected people back into nursing homes. And it is very easy to make bogus claims to support your view, please keep that in mind.

    If you look now at total deaths/mil per country, you see that many countries that had it OK for some time are now similar to other “leaders” – Sweden, France, Poland, Hungary … Among major Western countries, Germany and Canada seems to be only ones doing significantly better than others.

    Within the US, early “leaders” are still in the lead – liberal NE (from NJ to MA) states have 5 out of 7 worst states (2500 per mln) – higher than Belgium (1900). Closely following is six poor conservative states (Deep South and Dakotas). Remotest states are at the bottom – HI, AK, VT, MN,OR,UT,WA,NH – these are at German level (300-800 ). Some states similar to NE (VA, MN, MD) and to Deep South (KY,WV) are doing reasonably well.

    From taking it all together, it appears that connectivity to the world (esp Europe), high population density, large cities, being poor all contribute. In one of these factors, mobility, US is way worse off than Europe. It is much easier to stop travel thru Chunnel than between NY and NJ ..

    in reply to: How do airlines ban customers? #1954072

    Common, I am not flying. I am enjoying video conferencing and I drive within 8 hours from me. A lot to see…

    As you just said: you are complaint and nobody bothered you. You should be thankful that they keep others compliant and keep you safe. There is no reason people in an airplane can’t put on a K95 that does not slip.

    Not all idiots are Jewish, I hope you did not imply that. We talk hear about Jews as we expect us to have better midos and common saychel.

    in reply to: How do airlines ban customers? #1954058

    Ctlawyer: low cost, low service carriers such as Frontier and Spirit.

    I think most of those who fly large families for a little vacation find using British Airways for that a tad expensive. We should thank Herb Kelleher for starting SouthWest and developing a new business model and Press. Carter and Reagan for deregulation, and for fracking industry keeping fuel cheap for allowing masses of Jews to fly to Israel and afford Florida vacations. Just average prices are 2x lower now than in in 1978 + Spirit.

    A free tip: you get even lower prices on Spirit if you buy in the airport. Spirit defines part of the ticket as “online sales tax”. With that, they do not pay other taxes on top of this tax. If you pay at the airport, you do not pay it, of course. So, if you have bli ayn hara a large family, hop in the car, go two hours before Spirit has a flight (when they asre open but no lines), have one person wait in the car. If you ask nicely, they can even assign your seats for free.

    in reply to: How do airlines ban customers? #1954041

    common: you are pretty vague accusing airlines of being rude “on a power trip” “roaming the isles looking for reasons to complain”. Are you saying – they want you to wear the mask and you are not complying? Maybe they just want to come home safely?

    in reply to: Foolish Democrats #1953948

    Syag,
    you still mostly make your thoughts to yourself when you say “don’t make any sense”. if you are trying to discuss something, you need to diverge some specifics.

    As to masked shuls – are you listening to yourself? if you are saying they were noit safe, it means they did something wrong.

    You seem to conclude that no protective measures matter, we will all get sick anyway? My estimate would be that if your community is achieving herd immunity through direct exposure, it means you had about 3x people more dying and seriously ill than average (*). I really do not understand how you can be so calm about this. Maybe someone else can explain this to me.

    (*) Presume 70% for herd immunity
    CDC estimate Jan 2021 – 25% of population was infected.

    in reply to: Foolish Democrats #1953930

    Syag,
    I am not against asking shailos. I was pointing areas where I think it is important to ask them.

    Next you complain that I talk about what works for me. If I posted something that you think could not work, I am simply inviting you and others to think how to apply my experience to better yours.

    Re: minyanim. First, evidence that religious communities have large numbers is large. See Israeli numbers. Do people get sick in a minyan or a kiddush after that, or a yeshiva or a store nearby, is hard to say. There is a lot of general evidence that larger unprotected gatherings are more dangerous. Would you claim that covid does churches and not shuls?

    The way you describe your community points that minyanim did propagate covid (you mention that it went thru multiple people in same shuls). you also mention that maskless got it earlier – this means that maskless had higher probability. It also points out that your masked minyanim were also not safe. It is, again, your fault. I posted recommendations here months ago how to make it safer. You should have advised those minyanim on safety measures. If you did, and they did not listen, then it is not your fault. My experience is 2 out of 3 who followed some of my recommendations. Even 3rd adopted some minimal ones.

    If you were not sure, whether it was your business to go and tell them – you should have asked a shailah. You still can. Let us know what your posek says – are we arevim zeb’ze or not in this case?

    in reply to: orthodox Jewish democrat? #1953932

    CTLawyer, yashr koach, of course.

    accordin to adoption,org, whomever they are, 5% of Christians in US adopt, 2x over general population. 73% of adoptees are white, 37% of adopted are white. Several states have agencies that restrict adoptees to certain denominations, so you would not be able to adopt there.

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953929

    >> rav’s opinion, which was that distanced outdoor minyanim are so unreasonable

    I’ll put aside considerations of hillul Hashem and following the laws, as we are focused here on things that can be proved by objective research. for this purposes, I am applying this psak to those cases where objective research can be applied.

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953928

    DY >> You don’t need 100% immunity to stop covig from spreading
    It is not just an average number, it is about having a pool to propagate.

    If there were no clusters, and we were to reduce everyone’s risk by a factor of 2, and R0 would decrease seriously below 1, then pandemic will be over.

    BUT if a substantial CLUSTER of population continues being totally uncareful and in constant contact with each other, then covid will continue circulate among them and also touch everyone else. So, elderly will have 5x reduced risk due to their own vaccine, but they will still be exposed to that risk.

    There is a lot of evidence that COVID moves in such non-uniform way. This explains, for example, nursing homes that are deadlier near universities. Medical students, even if being careful, eventually propagate covid from the student cluster to the nursing homes.

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953927

    >> What are your “hard numbers” on the effectiveness of masks?

    Look at Jeremy Howard, et al An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19 published in PNAS Jan 2021. A review of various studies.

    The issue includes more than masks – SD, air flow, HVAC. It is clear that all of these significantly reduce risk. My sources include multiple articles on airflow simulation, discussions with a distinguished aerospace engineer, and my own experiments measuring airflows in several rooms, including a shul under controlled conditions (with/without people; with windows/doors opened, far/near vents).

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953903

    >> I agree with that, which is why I would never ask the fellow

    I understand where you are trying to stand, but I do not see “elu veelu divrei elokim” here. I read with interest arguments why anti-masking can be considered a reasonable position and did not find any of them remotely reasonable. We have hard numbers on one hand and innuendo and denial of reality (might be, what if, some say, everyone here) on the other. This is a very rational/scientific event where you can get to facts if you focus on them.

    Again, I can have rahmonus and psychological and sociological excuses why some of these people are not reshayim, but not asking them shaylos is reasonable. I think the Rav’s opinion was pretty much a mild opinion. I personally do not see what is the value of Gemorah learning by people who can’t figure out a reasonably simple thing, other than protecting people from inappropriate behaviors.

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953896

    Important statistical question – how correlated is mask rejection and vaccine rejection? are these independent issues in people’s minds or do we have same people denying everything?

    why is it important? say, 20% of people refuse each of them. If these are the same people, then you can expect pandemic to continue raging at 5x lower level. If these issues are independent, then only 4% of population (0.2*0.2) will be fully unprotected and we can expect significant reductions at the end…

    Argument for independence – people are bring unrelated reasons for each of the rejections. Argument for correlation – the reasons are excuses, and the rejection in both cases is based on distrust of science and authorities, independent character, ignorance, lack of empathy.
    Can we take a vote on 2 issues at the same time:

    reluctance to wear masks and to take a vaccine from 0 to 10?
    mine: 0 and 2

    in reply to: orthodox Jewish democrat? #1953863

    RebE: teaching to fish.
    Agree on the principle, but not sure whether this is advantage D. It is about policy effects, not declarations. D- policies create too many disincentives to fishing. Gingrich’s welfare reform was very successful in moving people to work. Kudos to Clinton for going along. Same goes for school vouchers that help poor people to put their kids in functioning schools.

    er: I also agree that we need a balance between educating others and ensuring our community can thrive. It is a delicate one. I would say, if an issue is not critical for our community, we should not vote for something that is bad for the society in general. I disagree that D- will help us as “minorities”. Jews did indeed benefit from “multi-cultural” approach that reduced pressure to conform, but at this point we are seen as rich, successful (aka un-equitable) conservative oppressors, not “minorities”. I think we will be uncomfortable in any society where either Ds or Rs take full control. Maybe Hashem created them at 50% each, so that they let us live in-between…

    in reply to: Foolish Democrats #1953857

    Charlie: There was a big decline in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in NYC after the BLM rallies.
    Syag: Had no more serious a spread than other minyanim.

    you_all guys need to start asking shaylos from your local Rabbis/PhD….

    Charlee – Indeed. There is a paper analyzing this. Mobility data explained what happened: rallies scared most other people from going to downtown and going out in general.

    A similar effect might happened in Syag’s shul: vulnerable people were coming less to maskless minyanim, and more to masked ones. Also, if you are saying multiple (more than 4) people getting it at the same time, it means “masked” minyanim were not really taking full measures correctly, such as closed windows; ventilation that does not have filters and goes into their faces; prolonged davening; flimsy non-medical masks bouncing on the nose; exempting chazan; reading Torah close together, etc. We discussed this here at length early on, too bad you didn’t digest this info to them.

    in reply to: Dr Seuss: anti-Jewish and anti-Black racism #1953866

    ok, so Dr Seuss going the way of Huck Finn, etc. Given that most of “classics” will have some outdated thought, most of it is already or will be denied.

    I do not have a CAT in this fight, but it seems that the real question is – what do they use instead?
    Most likely, some socialist and ethnic literature, further contributing to “dumbing down of America”

    I would mind less, if they go to Aristotle or Plato instead of Dr Seuss, though.

    in reply to: DOES YWN MAKE MONEY FROM PROMOTING THE VACCINES?? #1953690

    > nearly half of cancer treatments never underwent the golden standard double blind trials.

    I googled for this phrase, and seems that missing part is “emergency authorizations” or something like that. I agree, in general, that in emergency we should be relying more on observational studies, especially when safety risks are small. Performing small blinded studies could compliment this.

    The issue is also confounded with a need to consider multiple settings – who to give, when to give, etc, as discussed above. Note that A-Z Phase 3 was almost derailed by a simple fact that there were two different doses. Uncertainty of interpreting multiple arms is harder. You can’t just say “HCQ+zin given at day X” worked, when you went through 100 different combinations – as your success is a random result out of 100.

    Note that this is still science, just harder science than blinded tests. One type of such math is called “multi armed bandits” (as in Vegas): you run multiple arms and estimate two things – possible effect and remaining level of uncertainty. Sometimes you want to explore more of arms that have more uncertainty even if they did not show sufficient result yet.

    in reply to: orthodox Jewish democrat? #1953685

    >> I think socialism applies to Torah values. Government is there to support people’s needs<
    > The Torah is not socialist at all. however it does encourage private citizens to give tzedakah.

    I think this is all avodah zarah. Torah is not R- or D- (and for sure, not communist, of course). We may vote one way or another, but I don’t think we can and should fully subscribe to any movement, whether in US or Israel. One Talmid Chacham was asked, after an aliyah during heated times, which party he belongs to, responded “party of Moshe Rabeinu”

    in reply to: A freilachan purim!-happy anniversary #1953410

    DY, not just koron, but CORON OHR … don’t need no Torah codes, the peshat is here
    nisht: do not make up your own reasons.

    these are not my reasons, I think most commentaries say it is to not embarrass others or not to make them used to it (Chizkuni), or make it posibble for people to come for judgment.

    Moshe was wearing it all the time, except when teaching (Ohr HaChaim, Behor Shor) or only when communicating with Hashem, (Kli Yakar, Tur HaAroch) or both (Rashi, Rashbam, R Bahya). This seems like an argument for those who want to teach without masks, as student needs to see teacher’s face (Seforno, Chizkuni, Eruvin 13: R Yehuda being zoche “seeing back of R Meir”).

    Moshe retained the rays for his whole life (R Bahya), so he was wearing mask on and off for 40 years. So, don’t claim it is not possible.

    Seems a machloket between Onkelos saying that he used more than N95, a full mask, and Yerushalmi meikel on just a one-layer cloth mask.

    in reply to: A freilachan purim!-happy anniversary #1953358

    What can we learn from Moshe in terms of wearing a mask?

    Seems like he was wearing it to protect and not to embarrass others.

    in reply to: Israelmany #1953210

    Syag >> to say you are complimented and throw in a joke and a smile, and then make sure to leave a pinch in your exit.

    I am not trying to pinch anyone, h’vsh. I am just saying that it is a possibility to consider: if you see something not fitting, maybe your measure is off. Need to analyze.

    As you confirmed that this is directed towards me but did not specify the issue, I’ll try to guess: my previous comment was about who is a posek. Are you of the opinion that current poskim are ordained via urim v’tumim? I am mentioning the process of how one Rav gets recognized by others, and that there are also specialists in specific areas. All of that expanding on a remark from a Rav, who has many decades in official roles in a pretty mainstream community.

    in reply to: Israelmany #1953152

    Syag>> Some of your comments are very unusual

    Not sure whether you direct this at me, rightwriter, or someone else, (or all of us), but it would more helpful for us if you were more precise with your diagnosis. As it stands, I would understand your polite words as a definite compliment and will try harder next time! (who would want to make “usual” comments, after all). It also may be that if you see something “unusual” or “disturbing”, it is a sign to look over what your assumptions are.

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953114

    DY, we seem to have a different recollection about specific case – whether it was illegal at the time. The lesson I learned is that if someone behaves irresponsibly or illegally, he should not be relied to for his judgment.

    Please note that this is not just about different opinions. I am fine if you stand for kiddush, and I sit. The question is about several opinions, each of them having downsides. I don’t think even exacting Daas Torah takes you off the hook. Say, you go to the Rav and say – my son does not know how to swim, and he needs to take a dangerous boat to learn Torah. So, Rav says he has to stay home and be an ignoramus. It is still your fault that you did not teach him how to swim (Kiddushin 30).

    Same here. If your posek determined that your community can learn and daven without SD and masks (reasoning that otherwise you’ll not learn at all), it is still your fault.

    And the reason I talk about people walking in the streets w/out masks, because it is a shocking indicator how careless these people are even when a required effort is minimal.

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953110

    DY >> many fine talmidei chachomim who have always been responsible leaders agree on not obsessing over Covid to the level you have,

    A good question, except please strike down ” to the level you have”. These talmidei chachamim may be wrong, and in some cases, they changed their opinions over time, but most importantly, they need to deal with their followers and their capabilities and limitations. I can see, to simplify, the following logic: if those children do not go to yeshiva, they will go to other places, and the whole community will disintegrate. So, I don’t need to make a judgment about their judgment.

    I am talking specifically about an individual. It is not material for him that someone permitted Covid kulos for the community. If this person is not behaving as a Talmid Chacham immediately (“at night”, using Gemora language) – fine, everyone can make a mistake in a situation, but if he does not stop (“in the morning”), then he is not a Talmid Chacham.

    in reply to: Vaccines and the Shidduch Crisis #1953080

    DY, Mrs. Syag,
    let’s go step-by-step so I can understand your logic.

    There are numerous cases and groups of people who disregard DS and masks in their shuls and schools, and who disregard state mask orders. I am excluding gray areas here. Many people, including myself, see them, and they are all over photos, and the photos are not all done by evil chilonim. Do you agree with that?

    The fact that these people contributed to extra deaths seems to be straight-forwards from statistics. Do you agree?

    You can argue that some communities live in small urban dwellings, etc. This is a reason not to accuse people wholesale based on statistics, but this is not a reason not to be careful, just the opposite.

    Is there an over-reaction on the other side? I don’t see it, but will be happy to discuss. I personally just go around un-masked people. I have to admit that I was ready to use a chair or a foot to clear space when unmasked Hamans showed up at the end of Purim davening with their gifts – but just the look worked.

    DY, to clarify: the question was during a lockdown in that state, when the activity is question was against the rules. It was an oral ruling, not in writing. Similarly, at the same early time, R Heinemann responded to a question whether one can do minyanim with people standing on different porches, etc to stay within the rules. His response – a passerby will not delve into minute details, he will just know that Jews are doing something questionable – and then, some Jew may be denied a ventilator because of that. Using this criterion, our current minyan is OK: a passerby snapped a picture of us during a snow day and – when I looked – showed a thumbs up.

Viewing 50 posts - 6,751 through 6,800 (of 7,287 total)