Always_Ask_Questions

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 9,037 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Who is a Jew? #2503890

    > **any** exposure to frum Yidden makes a non-frum Jew NOT a tinok shenishba.

    This would clearly be different depending on circumstances and times. It is one thing when someone is captured by some tribesmen, is illiterate, and then being brought to the functioning Jewish community. It would be different if someone is exposed to various philosophies (whether medieval Christianity or Islam or any combination of modern -isms) and is also then is exposed to Judaism that has multiple non-kosher branches plus kosher variations that sometimes call other variations treif.

    in reply to: What is a Frum Feminist? #2503375

    Here is a frum feminist for you:
    Devorah says that her going with Barak to a battle will be an insult to him. Why? Because Devorah was teaching Torah and, thus, as we all know, was exempt from mitzvos unless there was no one else to perform them. Thus, if she is seen going with Barak it is clear that she is not there to support, but she is doing it because the battle will not be won without her. And that is why she is singing the song, to show that she is there for a reason, and did not abandon her Torah learning for no reason. I’ll leave kol isha for another time.

    in reply to: Who is really a Gibbor? Who is really a Kadosh? #2503373

    YYA, maybe directly related – Bava Kamma when discussing how to safely discard pieces of glass mentions 3 ways of becoming a chassid – nezikin, avos, brochos. So, I am listening to a visiting T’Ch discussing brochos, saying, as motivation: “as Gemora says you can become a chossid by learning brochos”.
    There are like 30 yeshivishe T’Ch sitting in the room, all smiling and nodding. I was surprised not just by the partial gemora, but that nobody raised an eye and gave a thought about it. I was not sure whether my concern was appropriate – after all, this was not part of a halachik discourse, but a motivational piece and the discourse was about brochos. I did not want to embarrass the Rav in public and did not get a chance to ask in private, but I asked another senior yeshivishe rov. He understood my question and said – if you don’t know brochos and kashrus, you are not a Yid, but middos and nezikin not so … [of course, gemorah does not mean basic knowledge, but chasidut]. But I think this was an honest admission that the change of focus is due to desire keep students “Jewish”.

    I am actually stuck at this topic. I often go to R Soloveitchik’s writing for such haskafik issues, and I just saw in his hesped for a Torah Vadaas Rosh yeshiva who was a prominent chabadnik, he says that chassidus, and chabad especially, focus on teaching people saying brochos with right attitude – and also quotes same gemora in part….

    in reply to: Who is really a Gibbor? Who is really a Kadosh? #2503364

    YYA> Torah and Mitzvos are the ONLY real תכלית החיים

    Thanks for the clarification. You seem to be decoupling mitzvos from real life. So, giving maaser is a mitzva, but spending time protecting fellow Yidden is not? I understand from, for example, Ramban’s naval b’rshus Torah is that you can apply your mitzva approach to other areas that are not necessarily defined explicitly, at least in bein adam l’havero. And all gemoras and sifrei mussar, are you dsicarding them all also? In truth, I don’t think you personally hold by that, but I agree that this became a “party line”. It is clear why – because the anti-religious groups are highlighting and perverting those values and you want to oppose the chazerim.

    in reply to: Who is a Jew? #2503353

    makes sense, who wants to debate in front of a bunch of goyim. Why did you even signed up for the site that has rov goyim? You do realize that if you lose your train of thought here, nobody is going to return it to you?!

    in reply to: Who is really a Gibbor? Who is really a Kadosh? #2503084

    YYA, I see. I think you are posing this false choice between bitachon and having an Army – maybe based on all the problems you describe with IDF. I am not certain to what degree these problems present themselves but I am sure they are there. So, I understand your emotional attitude.

    I am only pointing out that a country requires an army, as much as it requires a police force and a tax authority, as much as a person requires a doctor and a hairdresser. You are not allowed to live in a city without a doctor. Similarly, it will be madness to live in a country without an army.

    Doctors are often, and were often, not religious. There were also great doctors like in Taanis. “You go to the war with the army you have” (tm Rumsfeld). Jews had to serve in many armies in the world that are way worse than IDF. Yet, it is very zionist of you to demand more from a Jewish army than the Czar’s army, and I do not disagree.

    But you do demonstrate that zionists were right in one aspect – you argue from the fact that Jews did not have an army for a long time. But were we ever in a situation where it was practical to have an army? There was, for example, a Jewish state in Yemen at some point – do you think it did not have an army? Take Khazar – did Kuzari advise him to discharge his army? when did we join Quakers and I missed that?

    in reply to: Who is a Jew? #2502870

    yankel, I did not (yet) learn vayoel moshe, but when under shmad, we don’t change even minor things, right? Just playing shvuos advocate.

    in reply to: Nurses Strike NYC #2502825

    well, maybe kahal can hire their own nurses who graduated Touro and Landers.

    in reply to: Who is really a Gibbor? Who is really a Kadosh? #2502833

    Are eating and drinking bad because there are so many gluttons and drunkards? Then, how come we have a brocha before and after? And it is not just an aveirah to enjoy the food you said brocha on.

    As DoMoshe suggests, should you not have nahas when you put a tefilin? your child? grandchild? greatgrandchild? an Yid you found in Times Square?
    Should you just ignore that you are part of a success masorah and taught someone else?

    What if you or your child became a brain surgeon? Developed Iron Dome? Used Iron Dome to protect batei midarshim from reshayim?

    DaMoshe> Maybe the reason they push having pride in it is so that people will be more likely to serve in the IDF?

    but also people who suggest ignoring all achievements have motivation that someone, H’V, will go serve in IDF?

    in reply to: Math Riddles for Dr. Pepper (and other geniuses) #2502721

    for a change, a Torah question: which arithmetic operation is meduaraita?

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2502722

    because they are republican or chicken hawks?

    in reply to: Who is really a Gibbor? Who is really a Kadosh? #2502720

    YYA< a great summary of the debate. I am not sure why this is such a special topic, and not the issue of combining hishtadlus with relying on Hashem. Maybe an extreme one, but still not different.

    Do you hesitate every time you need to go to a doctor – whether it is appropriate to address the issue or it is Hashem’s punishment for the crude words you posted in CR? Every time you run out of milk, do you hesitate going to the store because maybe it is because Zionists misinterpret eretz zavat halav udvash?

    Why is there a contradiction between having a functioning military. Every Jewish king had, competitive to all neighbors – you focus on churban that happened every 400+ years. Do you realize that the army was required to keep BM operating for those 400 years?

    Specifically, for Roman times – having a strong army did not work for many nations that were conquered by Roman. As the policy of the empire was to scare everyone from a rebellion while improving their economic life, they would be disproportionally cruel to occasional rebels: strong Judean army just caused for more legions to be collected from other parts of the empire. Presumably, Rabbonim understood that and advised against rebelling – not because they preferred Roman power or were pacificists, like you propose here, but because of Realpolitik: it was just not possible to rebel against such a strong empire.

    in reply to: New Laws and Disobedience: A Hypothethical Situation — Your Opinion #2502719

    books by R Orlowek, for example.

    One hidush from R Orlowek: he was discussing teenagers, and I asked him what is current age bracket for “teenagers”, he said it is a good question and suggested 9 y.o. as a lower bracket ….

    in reply to: New Laws and Disobedience: A Hypothethical Situation — Your Opinion #2502718

    Many Rabbis, in person and in writing, actually wondered – why operating machinery requires a license, but parenting does not …

    similarly, answers to the question to parents with a newborn – when can they start learning about parenting – “you are at least 9 months late”.

    To the question of government-required courses: if the courses have useful material about safety, medicine, building codes, basic middos, there should not be problem with that. If there is spiritual/psychological component – it should be evaluated. This is probably similar to public schools that Jews were at time mandated or pressured to go to: you mitigate what is wrong. Possibly, we could develop our own courses and have government approve them as a substitute. In fact, I am not sure why Jews are not leading on this. Great idea!

    in reply to: Who is a Jew? #2502717

    I almost chocked on my re-heated chulent from reading this. You start valuing mods after they retire … Thanks to YYA and others who wrote nice responses. My only question remains – is there a live Rav who approved these positions or the poster simply comes up with his own interpretations (or reads these interpretations).

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2502175

    YYA> there is no היתר to sacrifice Jewish lives בוודאי because of a ספק that maybe the Goyim will then be happy.

    le derech shalom? The nations can make Jewish life miserable if we do not along with them, so you got to take their opinions into account. And it was always done.

    some> I don’t believe that there is any respected student of the chazon ish that claims in his rebbi’s name that such a person is still part of “amecha

    can you quote his students who say otherwise?

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2502173

    YYA> Chofetz Chaim is quoted by Rav Elchonon in Kovetz Maamarim

    could you expand on that? Are these direct quotes? while Chofetz Chaim was still alive? I think most of it is after … Unless there are similar direct quotes from Chofetz Chaim, I would call this source R Elchonon, not Chofetz Chaim …

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2502172

    yankel> most mainstream rabbanim were against demo’s … this is not news at all

    then, please continue posting these opinions and ask charedi publications to post them, and then maybe do something to enforce these opinions.
    Demand your politicians speak about this problem in Knesset.
    Have demonstrations against demonstrations.
    Otherwise, everyone else assumes that the mainstream supports them.

    Why is community so shy of opposing their own mistreats?

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2502171

    YYA, I have to agree with your refutation of my occam razor (so it was too sharp for me) – there are more of those who condemned R Goren than those who simply disagreed with other non-charedim. some things/decisions that I heard of do raise questions .. at the same time, I heard from talmidei chachomim who considered him same … and these are T’Ch who are capable of calling out someone who is not. Would it be fair to summarize that he took upon controversial topics and might have ended up wrong. I don’t think this is such a bad thing. If a person has kelim and tries to reach emes and is not afraid to put his opinions out, then he might get something wrong, it is still better than those who do not have skills or integrity or bravery.

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2502122

    yankel> shavu’oth are different to hilchot lashon hara

    you are right regarding having a solid source, but YY has also a point: there are issues that raise and fall with generations. There were periods when AZ was a burning issue, but we are not learning many of those halochos as daily necessity (while they are still on the books). So, Ch Ch felt that LH became a more serious issue than before (not just social issues but also technical – appearance of first media, maybe – newspapers and then telegraph?). So, a general prescription (agaddah) early on was sufficient to keep the village whisperers at bay, but more complex society required more halachik guidelines.

    in reply to: Perfect: The Enemy of Safe #2502120

    The situation itself is indeed unclear, both sensational reports and whitewashing explanations can be fake. Hopefully, facts will be clarified later on. Savlanut.

    I presume those who live there know what the general situation is and can discuss, and I presume that OP knows things first-hand. My suggestions below are not based on facts, just on basic economics, so please correct me when I am off-base.

    I suggest that the original problem is social and will not be fully fixed by heksherim or gov supervision. If parents do not have enough money to pay for adequate supervision, it will not happen. Caregivers will have no certification not only because of cost of certification and required limits on number of kids, fire safety standards, etc. Certification probably also means that wages have to be reported, taxed, and benefits reduced, that wages have to be according to some minimal standards, maybe even insurances.

    So, one great idea: parents need to get more funds – hopefully, by acquiring skills and getting good jobs. Possibly part-time so that they can learn like Hillel and others.

    Another – accept life of poverty, there is nothing wrong with that, but take responsibility for safety of children: grandparents, older siblings, local BYs can all do chesed. Fathers can learn from home with books and zoom calls while keeping an eye on children while showing them an example of Torah learning – or even teaching these children Torah.

    I quoted several times already a story of Mitteler Rebbe learning without paying attention to his crying baby that rebetzin asked him to watch (another future Chabad Rebbe). His father, Alter Rebbe heard the cries from his apartment upstairs and came to reprimand his son for not watching his grandson. Interestingly, Alter Rebbe did not offer babysitting services, maybe he considered his own finishing Tanya more important, or he was not on his daughter-in-law’s approved babysitting list. Anyway, get your parents into the same building and go for it.

    in reply to: Who is a Jew? #2502118

    YYA< thanks for formulating this so well.

    some> who is part of “amecha” (am yisroel/klal yisroel), and those basic requirements are 1) keeping most common mitzvos, 2) believing without doubt the 13 ikarim, 3) keeping shabbos publicly. … as my stance is well documented in Chazal and poskim.

    I asked and may have missed the answer: could you pls provide a reference that says tinokos shenishba are not counted in amecha. From universally accepted sources, such as MB, not from the individual poskim, however great they might be. And also, you can’t make such decisions from books only – please tell us what your ruv said about this idea.

    Given the severe implications of your so well stated position, I will have to exclude you from amecha unless satisfactory answers are provided.

    in reply to: Math Riddles for Dr. Pepper (and other geniuses) #2500998

    The original poster demonstrate what happens when you “know” the problem but can not quote it in full.

    In fact, it is proven that it is enough to make one false statement, say, 1=2, then you can prove any false statement or something like that!

    Sheker, sheker tirchok.

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2500997

    Occam razor is sharp, don’t cut yourself!
    In this case, Occam razor actually says that a group of rabbis does not like another group because they do not like their derech, regardless of gadlus or lack thereof.

    in reply to: Proposed Solution to the Arab-Zionist Conflict: Non-Denominational State #2500995

    YYA> Most of the Maskilim and Zionists in the 5600s (1840-1939) fitted that definition.

    this is an interesting dating … like an era changed … we had imagination (avoda zara AND naviut) leaving with BM1 destruction … maybe controversies of 5600s changed with the churban the same way? We now don’t have the passion of anti-religious groups (communists and such) but also the passion of Chofetz Chaim …

    in reply to: Proposed Solution to the Arab-Zionist Conflict: Non-Denominational State #2500994

    YYA> I think we agree, I was just pointing out the technical reason why this PARTICULAR mitzvah campaign generated the most controversy.

    Right, I am just saying that those who point out the controversy are hasidei shotim who refuse to touch a drowning lady. Just find a way to come and help. It is an emergency, if you can’t go into the fire, take a bucket and help bring more water.
    (I am not against discussing problems, just keep them in proportion to importance).

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500990

    YYA> that way are just copy-pasting Goyish kefirah ideas into a pseudo-Jewish context to ape the secular Zionists they hold dear

    I partially agree with you here, and that is why we need to review all kind of claims. R Soloveitchik was unhappy when RCA distributed Mizrachi ideas about new holidays and such, saying that Rabbis are responsible for that, and political organizations should not be in the business of guiding observance. I think this is the same sentiment as you express.

    I would note that Judaism reacted to non-Jewish ideas and pressure in various ways in history – sometimes copy-pasting, sometimes opposing. Would you suggest any correlation between R Gershom ban on polygamy to Europeans not liking it, while Sephardi Jews had no problem with it? Rambam borrowing greek and arab philosophy and science. Overall, developing of Spanish Jewish philosophy in response to xian attacks and persuasion. One could say that Yidden don’t need no philosophy. Or, as R Soloveitchik remarks – if such philosophy was developed during Greek/Roman times and Jewish ideas would be fully absorbed, then non-Jews could have had a better religion than what they got by trying to adapt Judaism on their own.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500988

    YYA> BECAUSE OF OUR SINS, … Where is there ANY Torah source of any kind that faults the Jewish people or blames their suffering on their failure to have an army?

    this is a great question.

    Maybe Saul and Yoav not finishing off amelikites?
    Deborah chastising Barak (not Ehud or Hussein) for not going into the fight?
    Implicitly, Shimshon and Yiftach are imperfect leaders leading the fight when proper leaders were afraid, maybe retired to beis midrash
    Jews asking Shmuel to appoint a king, as they were not satisfied with weak leadership in front of enemies
    Plishtim capturing Aron, maybe because Eli’s sons were not good leaders.
    Apocrypha about Macabees not fighting on shabbat
    Most importantly, I think, Jews most of the time did not think about submitting to the enemies when it was possible to fight, so praise to Yehoshua/David/Deborah etc for fighting shows that having army is ok.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500985

    Shimon> There are more Halachically and technically viable solutions now than there ever were, which could be applied nationwide

    great that this is happening. You can also probably remotely control the grid – one Yid in US and one in Australia might cover the whole shabbos.

    in reply to: EVIL “nazi” comparisons – motivations #2500984

    Those counting how many Jews are non-religious when geulah came or comes, are also same people who do not want to bother to go try to help those people. When Hashem suggests to Moshe to start a nation from him – the posters here would be onboard with the suggestion. And then Moshe disagreed – they would also condemn Moshe for going against Daas Torah (the one that we all agree here).

    in reply to: EVIL “nazi” comparisons – motivations #2500983

    There is a story that when Chofetz Chaim was stuck in early USSR, he came to the local (Jewish) commissar and said to him – I don’t think I can move you to the teshuva, but when you’ll get to Olam Habo, you will be called to answer for your aveiros, and you will respond – I lived in a town where Chofetz Chaim lived, but he never gave me tochacha, maybe I would have done teshuva if he were to come. So, I came to take this excuse from you.

    I presume this was taki an attempt to get some feelings out of this man.

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2500939

    YYA> pitchforks …. Serving in the IDF involves multiple serious issues that the secular authorities have repeatedly refused to address,

    this is what we discussed in another thread about chasing car thieves on bikes. If practicality requires a standing army and the only generals are the anti-religious ones, then you join them and deal with them.

    Maybe we can take lessons from medicine: R Soloveitchik in an article explaining YU opening a medical school says that the frummest litvishe towns had two non-religious Jews – a doctor and a pharmacist. It was difficult to deal with them, but there was no other choice, there were no frum doctors. He even says it is harder to deal with non-religious doctors than with non-Jewish ones – the latter show some respect to religion if it is explained to them.

    According to your theory, those Litvishe Yidden should have suffered with the doctors. Maybe check R Grozdinsky’s teshuvahs – did he pasken that way.

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2500925

    YYA> ad hoc vigilante committee to go get the pitchforks

    what is the source of this, maybe I missed it above? Chacham einav b’rosho. We just saw tragically 2 years ago what happens if IDF slips in just one part of the border. Where will your vigilante get F-35s on a short notice – and pilots to fly them. This is actually what Zionists did early in flying european planes acquired any way they could.

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2500920

    > Let’s focus on the core issue. Secular Zionism was a highly organized and targeted campaign to destroy Judaism and replace it with a secular national identity.

    2nd, I don’t agree with this. Surely, they were anti-religious and often militant, but was this the main focus? The main focus was to organize as many Jews as possible to support their case and join the movement. They had enough non-religious supporters to look for. Were Hashomer Hatzair recruited primarily from yeshivos? I presume mostly among already numerous non-religious and assimilated Jews, who would otherwise become anarchists or communists.

    Do you mean already in Israel? Same – majority of population was not religious and Zionists saw religion as a dying entity.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500896

    ZSK, you are leading an interesting question: when/if charedim become a majority or a significant minority of voters – would they demand all, or most, electricity to be shut off for shabbat? Or going to the original question, would they require police chasing car thieves on bicycles? I think you quoted RZ teshuvos, are there charedi teshuvos on this issue? Even if they are not currently involved in running a state, a charedi policeman could ask such a shailah.

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2500905

    yankel> those rabbanims integrity and yirat shamayim totally precludes that from being the case

    It may be so. I looked closely at the case of cherem of making a gadol and it seems clear that the author has great esteem of the gadol who banned the book and still describes his reliance on information from people around him. Consider this as they call in math “a proof of existence” for rabbanim making bad decisions based on bad facts. The usual explanation is that talmidei chachamim are perfect halachik machines – but they depend on the reliability of inputs, so GIGO applies. Chassidiche rebbes might overcome this and have direct access to ruach hakodesh, so if the signers were not just Litivishe, their signatures are reliable regardless of bad information they might have relied upon.

    More generally, and without taking a position here, people who try to be pro-active and resolve new issues, put themselves at risk of both mistakes and accusations. Applies to many in history, both who are now roundly condemned and those who are eventually vindicated, see Rambam, Moses Mendelsohn, for example.

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2500913

    ZSK> I never said those Rabbonim had no integrity or yiras shamayim. What I said is that no one immune from biases, not even highly esteemed Rabbonim.

    and this is a good example how information flows … imagine that ZSK is a well-known talmid chochom (and maybe he is) and a gadol will ask his close student Yankel about ZSK, ending with ZSK put in cherem. So, Yankel will tell his teacher what he said here. Would it be gadol’s fault that he listened to Yankel?

    in reply to: Settlers are RODFIM #2500915

    ZSK> The Rabbonim could certainly have told the outlets to turn the level of vitriol down and to be respectful in their criticism – which they did not.

    more likely, that outlets were not listening to the rabbonim, and maybe rabbonim knew their limits already. There are lots of cases where rabbinical opinions show up late: turns out R Landau is against demonstrations. A year after covid after so many talmidim infected their revered teachers, we found out that R Zilberstein was sitting alone in his room all this time and then came to give a lecture behind a giant plastic fence. What stopped charedi press from posting pictures of the Rav daily before other rabbonim were niftar?

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2500919

    YYA> Let’s focus on the core issue. Secular Zionism was a highly organized and targeted campaign to destroy Judaism and replace it with a secular national identity.

    First, this does not contradict my ramblings. I am not fully condemning the separation that Chazon Ish created (nor I am saying it was the only way to go). It lead to a lot of successes in preserving and expanding observant community. I am just calling to understand what the negatives are. I am not sure Chazon Ish would disagree – he used the word “midbar”. He knew that wandering in midbar is not for your guf and neshomoh. He just did not see other choice. So, logically, by now, 80 years later – 2x more than Hashem’s measure – it is even less healthy. You don’t even have great-grandparents who remember life outside the desert. As an example, when Soviet Jews were coming in 1970s – they had no memory of Jewish life after 60 years of communist erasure, except Jews coming from Lithuania and such – who had “only” 30 years – and they still remembered.

    So, I am calling for honest diagnosis of accumulated problems leading to treatment. That’s all.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500817

    ZSK> Regarding use of electricity not being public order – it is public order if you consider the consequences of no electricity in the modern era, which would be utter pandemonium.

    I agree. Yes, public order would require electricity for hospitals and even to make sure those driving on shabbos do not bump into each other. It does not mean that someone has to use it personally, so charedim seem to be ok here as long as they keep medical equipment for their own sick connected,

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500816

    ZSK> As for starting a solar panel business in Israel, the IEC will work with people who want to install solar panels to reduce their power bills (and maybe charge batteries for use over Shabbos

    right, but this sends electricity back into the same grid. I think you should be able to use your own solar panels or connect them between nearby houses to be totally “off the grid”. Meah solar panels over Meah shaarim.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500814

    Shimon> We are sheep for the slaughter and proud of it,

    I think you are going too far, while protesting against secular movements that were destroying Judaism 100 years ago (and full picture – it was not only zionism, it was bundism, socialism, communism, local-country nationalism …). We suffer when we have to, but we defend ourselves, either through presents or through fight when need to and are able to. This is Yaakov/Esav 101.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500813

    Shimon> Don’t tell me stories about “protecting Jews”. There are plenty of Jews protected by the US Army (including those in Israel…)

    So, Jews – and non-Jews – serving in the American army deserve their level of respect. How does this contradict the fact that IDF protects Jews in Israel? I did not read this whole long thread, so I may be not following this. Are you in the camp of “Jews could have lived in other places”? This is not true historically – before WW2 and after WW2, there was no place in US or UK for all Jews of Europe. Same for Sephardi and Soviet Jews, majority of whom found a save place in Israel. Undoubtedly, early zionists and state of Israel saved Jewish lives. Furthermore, in terms of assimilation, Israeli Jews are fairing much better than those who settled elsewhere. Even those who are not religious, have a high chance of marrying someone Jewish.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500808

    Shim re:Herzl > He saw antisemitism as a useful tool to convince Jews to join his secular nationalistic project. He said so to many non-Jewish leaders as well… More like a terrorist setting your proverbial building on fire to force out the children and kidnap them.

    He was a journo shocked by the Dreyfus affair from his beliefs in successful assimilation. Why are assigning to him some nefarious motivations? He was telling non-Jewish leaders whatever he thought would work best to achieve his goals. He was a total ignoramus, but he was not a professional politician who needed to create a job for himself.

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2500804

    Shimon > Actually, secular Zionism began as a response to the non-Jewish nations refusal to ALLOW the Jews to escape their identity.

    I think there was an argument in non-Jewish world about it. Napoleon wanted to assimilate Jews (his question to his Sanhedrin: are you our brothers? willl you let us marry your sisters?), Marx initial impulse was to blame Jews for capitalism and “assimilate world from Jews” in response to someone else who wanted to “assimilate Jews”.

    in reply to: Math Riddles for Dr. Pepper (and other geniuses) #2500467

    n = 2, x = 1, y = 2, z = 2
    2 = 2
    maybe you missed something in the riddle?

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2500459

    A question on Taanis: so the good doctor gets 7x visits from yeshiva shel maaleh over Abaye.

    First, why such unusual “yeshivish” distinction – not Eliyahu talking to him, or golden table in olam habo. I guess this also means that he is not an Am Haaertz DESPITE (tm YYA) being a doctor.
    Why are they visiting? do they ask him questions? do they teach him? do they have a pleasere talking to a doctor with middos?

    And one more: surely in the shamaim they are aware that bloodletting is not as helpful as advertised, so they good doctor might have killed a number of patients – and they still respect him “for the effort”. Or maybe they were coming so often – to warn him not to do bad medicine and save his zechus from the gehinom that was awaiting other doctors!?

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2500458

    YYA> He wasn’t a Tzaddik BECAUSE he was a doctor. DESPITE being a doctor,

    I will agree that he is not a tzadik “because he was a doctor” – it is clear that he is a special doctor, not like others. But “despite” is taking it too far – gemorah clearly values his services, otherwise who cares that he did not charge … he is special because he used his skills in the right way. It is not just tzniuyut – he does not charge fixed fee, respects dignity by not seeing who pays what, helps young T’Ch who do not have a job yet. judge pretend-swindlers l’tzad zechut, I probably skipped a couple of middos. Maybe I can accept “despite” as – a doctor has an opportunity to charge high fees and be dismissive of patients, he does not do that.

    This easily transfers to our life: I asked a related shayla once – why are people visiting cholim are recognized as baaley chesed, while people doing heart operations are seen as “professionals”. The answer (from a yeshivishe rov): if a doctor’s priority is money, then he is a professional; if his priority is chesed, then he is baal chesed. Along the line of the gemorah. I am sure there are people in IDF who are there on a power trip, and there are those who are for the right reasons.

    in reply to: Is Chabad Sacrificing Their Youth In The Quest For Outreach #2500456

    Shimon> what their ‘success rate’ is.

    I agree it is not about success rate. Specifically, for chabad more than for others, there are people who end up not in a good place, some OTD or OTD children or very frum but still crazy. The question to ask – what would happen with that person without the intervention. He would probably still be drinking just non-kosher… there might be a detrimental effect on the community, but a particular individual almost always benefits. I don’t think I know baalei teshuva who took a worse path than the one they were following to begin with. Well, maybe some who in an attempt to feel frummer sent their children learning at a low level instead of college/profession, but this is a different story and not only chabad fault.

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 9,037 total)