Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 5, 2013 5:20 pm at 5:20 pm in reply to: What problems can you think of in this sticky Halachic case? #957486akupermaParticipant
Yichud applies regardless.
She can’t be your Shabbos goy.
You probably have to encourage her to become frum, including routinely treating her as a guest on Shabbos.
akupermaParticipantHis methodology aroused bemusement among genealogists, who usually start with themselves and work back. Doing it the other way around, picking a person and working forwards, ends leading to virtually meaningless results if you start going back too far – and 500 years is stretching it. I used the book to study the development of surnames and found it fascinating.
At this point, virtually every Jew, and probably almost every goy in Europe and the Middle East, is related to Avraham Aveinu, as well as to everyone else from that time. People were constantly moving around. Indeed, we have a mesorah, admittedly al pe kaballah, that every human had a common ancestor less than 5000 years ago (the goyim hold the common ancestor was probably more like several hundred thousand years ago).
Remember also that tools of genealogy don’t pick up converts, since we had to forge fake yichus for them since if the goyim knew someone converted they would execute them as a heretic. It also misses people who went off the derekh, whether or not they later returned, since it would have been loshon ho’ra to record such matters.
My response to someone who starts boasting of yichus is to point out I’m from the family of Adam ha-Rishon by way of Avraham Aveinu, and then ask them what they are descended from.
akupermaParticipantThe are many matters about which Rishonim disagreed, Therefore some were right and some were wrong. If they had all agreed on everything, there would be no need for Achronim to carry on the debates. The question is therefore a classic example of a “Klutz Kasha” since on its own terms the answer is obvious.
akupermaParticipantIf you are really sure you want to be a doctor , realize you’ll have to borrow a humongous sum of money to pay tuition and support your family, and will probably never get rich being a doctor, and your wife likes the idea – why not?
akupermaParticipantSomeone attempted to compile a list of the descendants of Rav Meir Katzenellenbogen (the book was entitled “Unbroken chain”). He ended up proving that virtually everyone alive today is related if you go back a mere 500 years, at least in western Europe. Since this increases exponentially, it turns out everyone alive is related to someone in the last 5000 years. A hiddush!
akupermaParticipantWould you hold by the science available at the time of say, R. Moshe Feinstein and the Satmarer (the real and original) Rebbe?
What about the science from the time of the Hafets Haim, or the Vilna Gaon.
akupermaParticipantFrom a dikduk perspective, “only” is quite correct. The author is stating his/her belief that 290 shekels is a low price for the service offered. It implies the parents are getting a good deal. The author may be totally treff when it comes to facts, but from a grammar perspective he’s glatt kosher.
akupermaParticipantDefine internet!
Do you mean paying for things with plastic cards, or increasingly via a cell phone, so much that paper money and coins are increasingly for collectors, not shopping? I doubt that’s what you object to.
Do you mean the possibility of a hospital to access your medical records held elsewhere before they give you a fatal dose of a drug you are allergic to? I doubt that’s the problem.
Probably you object to use of graphic browsers to see “inappropriate” images – though in all fairness, people found ways to find inappropriate images long before there were computers, or photographs. Some of the oldest man-made objects known appear to be pornographic (and if you hold by our Torah as an historical document, that should not be a surprise).
However the increasing trend of younger people to get information in short bursts, with a high graphic content, rather than from reading and understanding texts is a real problem. Since frum Jews spend a lot of time pouring over documents, we’ll probably be the last ones with decent reading skills.
akupermaParticipantI”If something like this were to happen right now in Israel, would akuperma say “Oh, that again! Pogroms happen- live with it!”? I sincerely hope not. “
It would be sad if the Jewish community of Eretz Yisrael, or Brooklyn, or Lakewood, was destroyed, but it would not be the end of the world. Such things will happen, have always happened, and will always happen. It is inevitable.
Remember that Stalin and his disciples, could only perceive the world of sheker, and from that perspective a murder, or a massacre, or an act of genocide is definitive. You live only for this world. We however know this world is a mere “prozdor” and nothing more. We perceive the world of emes, and realize that the problems in the prozdor are, in the final analysis, inconsequential.
akupermaParticipant“but there is no classified checklist locked in a defense ministers drawer that reads “list of ways to break frum people and turn them into secular zionists after enlistment”…”
Actually the Defense Minister believes that the conscription of hareidim is a dumb idea since it will recruit many soliders who will not be helpful in defending the country (unlike the hareidi volunteers, who in fact might not continue to serve once conscription of yeshivos is put in place), and will be soldiers who will be very expensive to maintain (since married draftees, especially with children, are paid substantially more). From a military perspective, there is no “case” to be made for conscription of yeshiva students.
akupermaParticipant“musser zoger” — What do the Arabs demand? What do the Israelis demand? Territory, economic control, etc. Is either side making demands reflecting anything other than gashmius? Are we demanding they give up Islam? Are they demanding that we give up learning Torah? Look at everyone’s solutions – it’s about borders, settlements, governments, etc. – only thinks affecting the prozdor. We kill, they kill. We destroy, they destroy. That is how wars are fought. If you oppose killing and being killed after matters pertaining to this world, feel free to become hareidi, and worry about real world (as opposed to the world of sheker)
akupermaParticipant1. Pogroms happen. They have been happening for several millenia. Before that, we had problems like foreign armies hauling away most of the population. We are old hands at surviving genocide. To a “Reform” Jew who believed that the European were the greatest civilization in history, and that the Germans were the most civilized and most advanced people in the world – the holocaust was a horrible shock. To frum Jews, it’s a matter “oh, that again”. They try to kills, HaShem stops them, we survive and carry on. In a few years we recover. It’s happened before, and will probably happen again. Live with it.
2. At this point in time, if we consider how many people would be putting on tefillin this morning if nothing happened – going back to 250 years (i.e. to just prior to the start of the modern period) — the leading cause of reducing the number of Bnei Torah is not the holocaust or even pogroms in general during the period — but assimilation. In fact, most Bnei Torah in America today are the descendants of the refugees from, and survivors of the holocaust. The 90% of American Jews who roots predate that period are for the most “gone”. A handful survived, and a handful of those on the verge of being lost became Baalei Tsuvah — but almost all are lost just as much as the ten lost tribes, or the six million who died during the last world war. It’s nice that most Americans (and probably most goyim in Europe and Middle East) have some Jewish DNA (or rather, DNA inherited from Jews), but what matters are the number of people learning Torah and doing mitsvos.
Thus you shouldn’t get all bent out of shape about the Arabs (with whom we have a disupte about real estate – dinei mamonos at best), but should be panicing over Lapid. You should not place your faith in the IDF to protect you since they incapable of saving us from what threatens us, but you should be worried about the “war” be launched against the yeshivos in Eretz Yisrael, since that is our first and only line of defense against what really threatens us.
akupermaParticipantBecaus the Dati Leumi camp (Bayit Yehudi, led by Bennett) formed an alliance with Lapid. Likud and the hareidim could form a government, but only if Bayit Yehudi joined. So the reason Lapid has so much power, which he uses to attack the Torah world, is that the Dati Leumi/Modern Orthodox/Religious Zionists – gave it to him (and can take it away at any time).
May 29, 2013 7:37 am at 7:37 am in reply to: Thoughts on Someone Selling His Olam Habah on Ebay #971227akupermaParticipantIt was an off the derekh kid. Onemight suggest there is a connection between taking up cheeseburgers and taking up larceny – they are both prohibitted by the same laws, which he has rejected.
May 28, 2013 5:04 pm at 5:04 pm in reply to: An Open Letter from R� Shteinman Shlita Regarding IDF Draft #955880akupermaParticipantMay 28, 2013 2:31 pm at 2:31 pm in reply to: Message From Harav Yaakov Bender About Serious Drinking Problem In Frum Communit #1084986akupermaParticipantIs this limited to Americans (including American expatriates in Israel)? I haven’t heard about this problem elsewhere among frum Jews, and there are many complaints about American youth abusing alcohol. If it is an “American” issues rather than a “Jewish” issue, it affects how to address the problem.
Is this problem limited to the more “modern” types within the frum community who are trying to be cool? I haven’t observed the alcohol abuse among groups such as Satmar that minimize contact with mainstream American culture – suggest the problem is one of kids having too much access to internet, television and movies.
akupermaParticipantYWN’s editorial policy appears to reflect the dominant viewpoints of Boro Park / Flatbush, which means it tends to be sympathetic with Satmar and the Modern Orthodox/Religious Zionists on many but not all issues.
akupermaParticipantEveryone has a shidduch crisis, until they get married.
akupermaParticipantDerech HaMelech who wrote: “So does that mean that all Jews are neither right nor left but a nation taken out of all the other nations with signs and miracles?” — right, but tell the political junkies that, it will spoil their day
May 23, 2013 1:59 pm at 1:59 pm in reply to: Does not believing in the shidduch crisis make you a koifer? #954273akupermaParticipantNO, it means you believe in statistics.
The only person who had a serious problem finding a shiduch was Adam Ha-Rishon, and Ha-Shem had to intervene to resolve the matter.
Everyone has a shiduch crisis, until they get married. No exception. No hiddush.
akupermaParticipant“Right” and “Left” refer to which side of the French National Assembly people sat on during the revolution. Jews couldn’t hold office or vote.
The trend on YWN is sympathy with hareidi opposition to military service. Opposition to the conscription is a LEFT wing position.
Almost all posters and commentators, and the article posted by YWN, speak favorably of efforts to garner patronage and government spending for our community without regard to how it is financed – that is definitely a LEFT wing position.
Almost everyone here favors accomodation of religious minorities, such as ourselves, which is a LEFT wing position.
akupermaParticipantlesschumras: I’ve spent a good deal of time working with Reform and Conservative Jews. They hold that Orthodox Judaism, with its strict adherance to mitsvos, is a recent innovation, and that they (the Reform and Conservative) are really normative Judaism. To them we are a misguided cult who invented all this stuff out of whole cloth over the last few centuries. That is why they see no problem is trying to get the Kossel switched over to “normal” (as they see it) Judaism rather than the (weird, as they see it) orthodox practice of gender segregation.
akupermaParticipantBecause the Reform and Conservative Jews want to push the frum Jews out. They want to have their religion established as the official religion in the State of Israel, and to have our “Torah and Mitsvos” relegated to the status of a persecuted marginalized cult.
The efforts of “Women of the Wall” should be seen as being part of the same movement that includes drafting yeshiva students, cutting off funding of yeshivos and introducing punitive taxation aimed at yeshivos, banning gender separation in public, and probably to the rash of criminal prosecution of Orthodox Jews on dubious charges. Just because we aren’t shooting each other, doesn’t mean we are not at war.
akupermaParticipant1. Self-employment means running your own business. The alternative is to be an employee. Virtually all career offer the choice between “being your own boss” and being an employee.
2. Career refers to the substance of one’s work, not whether one is an employee or not. Running a business is a career, whether you are the owner or an employee.
3. Unless its a hobby, no business is permanently small by design. As a business grows, it ceases to be small. THat is the goal.
May 13, 2013 1:48 pm at 1:48 pm in reply to: Chassidush school in Brooklyn bans thick glasses #953266akupermaParticipantIf a non-Jewish newssource says something outrageous about us, be skeptical. It could be they are genuinely evil (quite likely if run by non-Orthodox Jews), or could be they are dumb.
Are they talking about prescription glasses? That would banning kids based on a physical handicap which will get the school in very big trouble with just about everyone.
Are they objecting to a type of frame (black frames are quite uncontroversial)?
Are they objecting to some style involving outrageous frames and non-prescription (i.e. clear) lens worn as a fashion statement – which would sound like something that might get banned.
akupermaParticipantto those who asked” Akuperma: “confiscating the money they raise abroad, as well as throwing the talmidim in prison.”
What are you talking about? Where did you hear this?
YNET and Israel Times sites.
They have decided that cutting off funding for yeshivos won’t work, since many yeshivos (the noisiest one in protest the government) never accepted government money, and that many yeshivos rely on foreign fundraising. Therefore the idea of merely cutting off government money won’t be effective in punishing yeshivos that oppose conscription. That requires fines that have to be paid from money raised from private donors, which means from America.
They also realized that fines against penniless yeshiva students (and face, even the most middle class 18 year is penniless unless he inherited a trust fund, which is very rare even in America and unheard of in Israel) are uncollectible, and therefore they will need to throw them in prison for refusing to serve in the army.
Look it, I know you guys really believe that the medinah was the beginning of the geula. But it times to admit that the zionists are the ones we daven for in Shmonei Esray every weekday with the bracha that includes “v’kal oyvei amecha meharah yekarasu”. Ha-Shem will protect the Am ha-Torah. It might still be, just not in the way you think.
akupermaParticipantHas anyone produced any frum Fan Fict for DS9 (or Star Trek)?
akupermaParticipant1. So why did he propose closing down the non-zionist yeshivos (that is the effect of confiscating the money they raise abroad, as well as throwing the talmidim in prison) – and its pretty clear that is what is being planned (according to the secular press).
2. If he’s concerned about frum parnassah, why not propose making it legal for people to get jobs outside the hareidi community without serving in the army – at present they will be arrested if they do so.
3. If he’s so concerned, why not propose an American style anti-discrimination law requiring what in the USA is “reasonable accomodation” of religious minorities (and is Israel is considered “religious coercion”).
There is no hazakah that he is a evil person (yet), so we need to be Dan le-Kay Zechus. He may have been misled. Some people joined the Nazi Party in 1933 not realizing it would engage in genocide. He can now resign, or better, join the opposition, and come home to Torah world he only recently left.
akupermaParticipantYou are allowed to spend extra to benefit your friends, and it is a common form of charity to deliberately overpay, and if “fair trade” means knowingly paying more than the free market rate for goods and service, that is charity. However it is somewhat less than honest for a retailer to say “fair trade” because he negotiated a bad deal, and are stiffing the consumers with higher prices in the hope they won’t switch to a more efficient, and therefore less expensive, competitor. Often the extra money coming out of consumers’ pockets under the guise of fair trade is going to someone other than the “poor” farmers (such as to rich landlords, corporate executives, government officials, etc.).
akupermaParticipant1. The Germans maintained they were acting in self-defense (which had the won the war, history would duly record — though the surviving Jews would have an oral tradition to the contrary). I believe they also renounced the Kellogg-Brian Pact.
2. The Germans passed a law authorizing the government to take all necessary measures (the “Night and fog” law) and if this was legal, it would be a defense under German law. The Allies disagreed. There’s a good chance than had Rommel become the new leader (in the unlikely event the July 1944 putsch won), he probably would have found many Germans were acting illegally (and one can argue that the Nazis were more afraid of a future German government blaming them for the holocaust than they were afraid of the Allies or the Jews, since they assumed they would be summarily shot if they lost the war – something the US wouldn’t allow). Needless to say, any Germans with “fear of G-d” probably fled the country or ended up being executed (though some survived).
3. From a Jewish perspective, everyone involved in the holocaust was guilty regardless of who gave them orders, though that position is not universally shared by the rest of the world (whose legal traditions allow for a criminal defense based on following orders).
akupermaParticipantWIY: Under German law, the only thing the Nazis had to worry about was if an eventual court found they hadn’t received valid orders. Some were a bit nervous about it. While the Brits and Soviets just wanted to execute war criminals with minimal trials, the Americans insisted on “due process of law” and ended up largely inventing modern international criminal law. It was quite radical since most western countries had always held that a soldier following valid orders was not subject to punishment.
Halacha is totally different than the goyim’s law. This has been an issue for the Israelis. It may become a very big issue when they start conscripting the Benei Yeshiva in a few months (assuming anyone shows up) – since if halacha as determined by the Bnei Yeshiva differs from what the army says, they will refuse to follow the orders. And if most hareidim regard the situation as “Shaas ha-Shmad”, they will be strict on everything
akupermaParticipantTo “Charles Snort” — translations
???? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? = The words of the teacher, or the words of the student, to whom do you pay attention (as in: what Ha-Shem tells you to do, or what anyone else tells you to do, which do you pay attention to).
???? ??? ????? = [you are required] to allow yourself to be killed rather than violate the law – this applies to unlawful spilling of blood, idolatry in all forms, or engaging in a sex crime — whomever is trying to coerce you to violate these laws is considered a pursuer trying to kill you and you may kill him in self-defense
??? ??? = period of persecution – such as when the powers that be are demanding non-observance of mitsvos as part of a program to undermine Torah and mitsvos — in this situation, even the most trivial minhag (e.g. tying shoes one way, if the non-Jews tie it a different way) is mandatory even if it will result in death
akupermaParticipantThis is a big issue for goyim, since most western legal systems considering it a valid defense that someone is following orders with a possible exception only of one knows that the orders one is following were also illegal.
For Jews this isn’t an issue since halacha is very clear due to the doctrine of “???? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? “. The only possible defense to following an order contrary to halacha is that it didn’t violate something that is covered by “???? ??? ?????” – and that doesn’t always apply (e.g. ??? ???). That means in a military such as that of the United States or Israel, where they don’t kill soldiers for refusing orders, it is never permitted to violate halacha due to superior orders (noting that doing something otherwise forbidden may be permitted for other reasons, such as preservation of your own life – but halacha allows that).
akupermaParticipant1. We still do. Men wear a robe (actually a cloak, such as a tallis). To make it more convenient, it now has sleeves. During the 20th century, the style for men moved towards shorter jackets, with longer jackets (frocks, kapote, etc.) only for more formal usage (among goyim, note that the Netherlands king wore a kapote when he took his oath, and most men work similar jackets for the wedding of the Prince of Wales). Long jackets lost popularity when King George V stopped wearing them in the 1920s (Jews couldn’t care less about him, so we didn’t get the message).
2. It appears that jackets, and pants, became a lot more popular in western Europe at the end of the middle ages (perhaps due to the climate suddenly got colder). Robes, without pants, are popular in many countries. Since the Americans and Western European conquered the world, their fashions become more prestigious.
akupermaParticipantThey are still being invented, however they raise all sorts of questions, both in terms of halacha and the “real world”. The prototypes are obvious, but they could be designed so it wouldn’t be obvious who has one one.
Could they be used for “candid” photography, which raises all sorts of privacy issues? Could they be used to view something inappropriate without anyone know what you are looking at?
akupermaParticipantIt is always to be a centrist. The problem is that there is some moral dubiousness between being a centrist between good and evil, or right and wrong. Germans who avoided killing Jews, but made a point not to get involved with the extremists who tried to overthrow Hitler, were centrists – and are still apologizing for it.
Would you want a doctor who considered an effective treatment and doing nothing, and being a centrist decided on a somewhat effective treatment? Doing a little bit of the right thing is very centrist, and very hypocritical.
akupermaParticipantLiving languages are dynamic. New words get invented all the time. Languages are in a constant state of evolution. All lexographers and gramarians can do is record the changes.
akupermaParticipantWhether (or “how many”) Hareidim serve/served in the IDF depends on definitions.
Many people define Hareidim in part as “not serving in the army.” By this definition, any Hareidi who serves in the army ceases to be hareidim (what the secular fanatics are hoping for). By this definition no hareidi has, is, or ever will serve in the army.
Once you broaden the definition to include such aspects as strict in kashrus and mitsvos (but that applies to all orthodox Jews), dressing “funny” (but that leaves out many such as the Frankfort au Main community), or holding that the Israeli state as now constituted does not have the power to pass laws that contradict halacha (but many Religious Zionists held the evacuation of settlments was against halacha, and considered armed resistance – does that make them Hareidi?) — you get a much larger hareidi community, many of who have always served in the army.
akupermaParticipantYou should study history, both our’s and the goyim’s. Then you’ll stop freaking out about conditions today.
akupermaParticipantDo you mean as formal dress for shul, a wedding, etc. Very few people consider a straw hat to be anything other than informal wear. In all contexts, wearing a straw hat suggests you consider the activity you are engaging in is not something very important. Straw is a very inexpensive fabric.
Do you mean informal usage? Such as wearing while on a picnic in the mountains?
And how do you define hareidi? If you define hareidi as wearing a black felt hat, then by definition no hareidi wears a straw hat.
If you define hareidi based on hashkafa (being mehudar in mitsvos, and perhaps most importantly, not accept the legitimacy of the Israeli government and holding that in a clash between Israeli law and halacha, we hold by halacha), then many hareidim wear 21st century western style clothes (but they still would not wear a straw hat in a “dress” situation).
akupermaParticipantAvi K:
Can you site to anything where either rav held that “Dina malchusa dina” would require obeying a conscription law aimed at getting yeshiva boys out of the Beis Medrash and into the barrack? The public statements from them and their talmidim suggest it doesn’t.
In any event, Dina Malchusa Dina would usually apply only to laws affecting welfare or safety, but not to laws that are clearly aimed at undermining the learning of Torah. Anti-Jewish laws were never held to be protected by that doctrine.
akupermaParticipantIf you like being bored, ignore this website. Ignore the news. Ignore the internet. Probably skip learning Torah (especially if you are a Ben Torah).
Remember that it is a curse to wish someone to “live in interesting times”
akupermaParticipantUnless you are a math teacher, who cares as long as you can do the math.
akupermaParticipant1. The government of Israel gives money to yeshivos if it is popular enough to attract votes. If they don’t give the yeshiovos money, the parties who want yeshivos won’t support them. As a result of the last election, the parties favoring support of the hareidi yeshiovos did poorly relative to the anti-hareidim, so the government will cut funding.
2. This is how a parliamentary system works. Each faction joins the government, and gets patronage and money for their favorite projects. It is very democratic and good politics, though from an economic efficiency perspective it stinks (in part because it guarantees high taxes).
3. Conscription is a separate issue. The government might end up saying that they will only fund veterans in yeshivos, but not non-veterans, which is their right. However passing a law that makes it illegal for at least some 18 year olds to learn Torah (requiring them to stop learning and join the army) is unacceptable to much of the frum community.
akupermaParticipantIf a rodef is a “Tinuk Shneshba” – he is still a rodef. It is sad. But if he is trying to kill you, you need to kill him first. You have no obligation to let him kill you.
Undermining the frum economy is a nuisance. We’ve lived with worse. Forceably taking students out of yeshiva, seizing their gemaras, and making them learn soldiering instead IS LIFE THREATENING. Torah is to us, what food and water and videogames are to the frei Jews.
I’m not advocating shooting the hilonim, but if they persist in trying to destroy the Torah community, they will find themselves destroyed (and hopefully, we won’t have to firing the shots — not our department, we usually outsource this to Ha-Shem).
akupermaParticipantWhether any Rav supported the medinah between 1948 and 2013 is irrelevant now, since an agreement to exempt yeshiva students from the military was in effect then, and it no longer is. An analogy would be to quote someone discussing how we view Germans from the second reich (1870-1918) and saying that was how the person felt during the third reich (1933-1945) when the policies changed.
Conscripting yeshiva students is a “game changer.” Not funding yeshivos, or structuring welfare benefits so as to injure the hareidi community is mere politics since no one argues that a non-Jewish government has any obligation to give moeny to yeshivos or to give money to frum people and causes. Drafting yeshiva students and ordering them to stop learning Torah is very serious. Even if Dina Malchus Dina applied to the government of Eretz Yisrael, it would apply to such a decree.
There’s even a gemara in Sanhedrin suggesting that if the military police come to arrest yeshiva students, they are allowed to to kill the police (i.e. that the Lapid-Bennett program means the zionists have a din of a rodef – and everything they’ve been arguing to support schechting Arabs as pikuach nefesh, now applies to the zionists — which, BTW, is a more radical position than even Neturei Karta has advocated).
akupermaParticipantNo one is objecting to those Jews who believe the future of the yishuv in Eretz Yisrael is a function of military and economic might, and who prefer to trust their family’s and our people’s future to their own ability. The issue is that those who believe the future of the yishuv is a function of Shemiras mitsvos and Limud Torah, and who want to trust their family’s and our people’s future to mitsvos and learning and trust in Ha-Shem, are being forced to give up learning to be soldiers. Note that no one is demanding that the hilonim give up their lifestyle and their culture and be required to spend several years learning Torah and concentrating on the correct doing of the mitsvos. The issue is the bigotry and intolerance of people such as Bennett and Lapid who are demanding that everyone adopt their life style, and are ready to use the coercive power of the state to get their way.
akupermaParticipantrabbiofberlin:
1. “Rock of Israel” was a compromise. Ben Gurion et al rejected the idea that the zionist claim was based on Torah (remember they were planning a very secular, socialist state – and a large faction wanted to ally with the Soviet Union), and this was the closest to referring to Torah they would allow.
2. During the 1948 (post agreement on yeshiva exemptions) to 2013 (yeshiva conscription) many rabbanim were quite willing to work with the state. They accepted the money and were content with the yeshiva exemptions (even if it came with a big price – most hareidim were legally banned from accepting jobs outside the hareidi community). That period is over, and it is clear that if conscription of yeshiva students is introduced, many rabbanim who were happy to “collaborate” with the zionists, will reconsider the 1948 to support the medinah (an alternative at the time was to have Palestine become an American colony) and perhaps go back to the positions that led to Dr. De Haan being murdered (and the groups that are now the Edis Hareidis being intimidatged into staying out of politics), names support for a single-state solution including both banks of the Jordan with an autonomous hareidi community under a majority-Islamic government (note that even the worst of the terrorists have rarely targeted hareidim and have never attacked an anti-zionist yeshiva – since 1929 which is well before the medinah and involved some dubious behavior by the British and perhaps the zionists both of whom clearly knew about the attack before hand).
akupermaParticipantNote that in our legal tradition, not only is it acceptable to break the nation’s laws when they conflict with halachah (“dina malachus dina” has only limited applicability in Eretz Yisrael, probably no applicability if you hold Israel is a Jewish state, and would never apply to laws designed to hurt or prevent doing mitsvos or learning Torah) — but wo reject the doctine of “superior orders” meaning that if you violate halacha because you were ordered to, it is no defense thaqt you were following lawful orders. From a Torah perspective, the Israeli soldiers and police who will enforce conscription would be as fully and criminally liable as the kenesset members and generals (the only “defense” would be that they were threatened with death, and that’s not even a full defense in all situations).
akupermaParticipantzahavasdad: “You live in a country you have to obey the laws of that country. “
So you feel Israel should apologize to the Eichmann family?? He was following the laws of the country he lived in. There is a theory that “Dina Malchusa Dina” applies in Eretz Yisrael, but even if it does, its rather clear that the gezerah on conscription is motivated by a desire to uproot the Torah world which means that it is a law we can ignore , as any other of the zionist laws that are aimed to undermine the Am ha-Shem and their dedication to Torah and Mitsvos.
We live in Ha-Shem’s world, and follow his laws. Ha-Shem hoo Malkainu (or if you want to be more modern, our President, our Prime Minister, our CEO, etc.). This is especially true in Eretz Yisrael in which the Jews only claim to the land is that Ha-Shem gave us permission to live there on condition we used this extraordinary grant (no other people were given their country by Ha-Shem) to we follow his laws. Perhaps those persons in Eretz Yisrael who are of Jewish descent who don’t want to follow the laws of the country they live in should move.
-
AuthorPosts