Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
akupermaParticipant
I know that at some JCC’s have separate male and female hours (in Baltimore the local JCC has a room that is separate for one-gender only, with separate hours for males and females = in addition to the larger fitness room which is mixed). ARE THEY ARENY INDEPENDENT “FRUM” SINGLE GENDER FITNESS FACILITIES THAT ARE PRIVATELY OWNED OR AT LEAST OPERATED BY FRUM ORGANIZATIONS, ANYWHERE?
January 21, 2019 8:01 pm at 8:01 pm in reply to: Freezer-Burnt: Most boys unprepared for dating or married life. #1665797akupermaParticipantDo you have any evidence that anyone, anywhere, any time was “ready to get married”?
January 20, 2019 12:43 pm at 12:43 pm in reply to: Freezer-Burnt: Most boys unprepared for dating or married life. #1664858akupermaParticipantMost children are unprepared for adult life. In pre-modern times, children generally worked with adults doing adult things (housework, caring for children, working in the father’s business, etc.) and learning how to be adults. In the 21st century most children go to school, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but that leaves them unprepared for the adult role of being heads of their own families. It isn’t a problem limited to Jews. In fact, in most industrialized countries, one sees a rapidly falling birth rate which is probably the best indicator that the children are unable to successfully transition to adult roles, which is already having a devastating effect on some countries (e.g. labor shortages, inability to fund social security systems, etc.).
January 17, 2019 4:23 pm at 4:23 pm in reply to: Will Israel be the korbon of Trump’s desperation. #1664099akupermaParticipantProposing a peace offer that allows for Israel to continue as a viable Jewish state is guaranteed to be rejected by the Palestinians. If the Arabs ever change their mind and offer to agree to anything that would permanently end the war and lead to Muslims recognize that a large chunk of Eretz Yisrael is no longer part of the territory of Islam, it would end the war, but that won’t happen. Trump knows that.
akupermaParticipantTrump will win. He can give the speech anywhere (in fact, it is only a 20th century custom for it to be a speech). He can choose an audience that will be very supportive, rather than a Congress mos tof whose members hate him with a passion. Pelosi will win points with her base for “dissing” the President, but to most people it will seem that she is now the one shredding law and custom.
January 15, 2019 7:56 pm at 7:56 pm in reply to: Palestinian Rashida Tlaib is Dem Version of Racist Steve King #1663157akupermaParticipantHiddush here?
Joe Stalin was the Russian version of Adolph Hitler, yet the British, Americans and politically correct people everywhere fawned all over him.
akupermaParticipantIt’s real to the people looking for shidduchim.
Always has been that’s way.
Then they get married.
And produce the next generation, which grows up and has a shidduch crisis (see first line)Exception to the above loop: Adam ha-Rishon has a real problem finding a shidduch and needed divine intervention and some really complicated surgery.
akupermaParticipant1. A cousin is someone with whom you have a common ancestor. Unless you hold ourself out to be descended from a bunch of apes, we are all cousins.
2. Closeness to cousins depends largely on geography.
akupermaParticipantTrump is no more unhinged than his critics. He has managed to capture two issues (protectionism and immigration) that had been parts of the Democrats platforms and made them his own, much to the consternation of the Republicans which favored liberal immigration and free trade (both being highly pro-business, albeit anti-labor, policies). Assuming the Democrats continue to move radically to the left, there will be an opportunity for a centrist moderate (someone pro-business, for consistent internationalist muscular foreign policies, etc.) to run as a fusion as moderates of both parties, together, outnumber the Trump or Socialist bases that appear to now control their respective parties.
akupermaParticipantThe “hatred” between Jews and Muslims is largely a function of the “real estate” dispute in the Middle East. Note the during the pre-zionist period, roughly 700-1914, Jews in most Muslim countries tended to regard themselves as better off than Jews in Europe, and rarely were inclined to flee unless they were conquered by Christians, whereas European Jews were in a state of constant turmoil due to annoying goyim. While Jews were second class citizens in Muslim countries (similar to African Americans in the “Jim Crow” era), that was a lot better than the frequent genocide in Europe.
Most Muslims come to America with the hope of being free of the constraints of living in an Islamic country. While the current wars in the Middle East are a problem, in all fairness America is treating them better than Germans (especially in World War I) and Japanese (during World War II) were treated in America.
akupermaParticipantHistorically, women were supposed to earn too much so they could support their families while did something more useful, such as learning. In our tradition, unlike the goyim, maniliness (being “macho”) was based on Torah and Mitsvos, not being a good earner.
akupermaParticipant1. Given that anti-Muslim feelings are stronger among Republicans than Democrats, that number 2-1 for Democrats seems about right.
2. Defining a Muslim, like defining a Jew, is tricky. Most Americans would say anyone from a Muslim (or Jewish) background who is not a Christian is therefore still a Muslim (or Jew) even if they aren’t very religious.
3. Most Muslims who came to America did so in the hope of assimilating into a majority culture where they will be free of many aspects of Islam (same for most American Jews).
akupermaParticipantSuch a breach of custom would backfire totally.
akupermaParticipant1. Collecting taxes is an essential function. Interestingly enough, paying refunds is not.
2. It is bad for “contractors” but no one else is horribly affected since they pay the money at the end. The government doesn’t save money by a shutdown, but it loses some fees it would have collected. Non-essential civil servants in the affected agencies (about a quarter of the agencies) get bonus vacation as a result of a shutdown, i.e., they get paid for not working.
3. We should all be proud of the politicians of both parties who are keeping their promises. Trump promised to build a wall, and the Democrats promised he wouldn’t.
December 31, 2018 12:44 pm at 12:44 pm in reply to: How Will The New Minimum Wage Laws Affect “Cleaning Help” #1654482akupermaParticipantIf the helper is your spouse or child or younger sibling, it will have no impact. One doesn’t customarily pay family members for helping. Paying a family member to induce them to help around the house does not require paying taxes or paying the minimum wage and if you start charging the kid for room and board, that also is not a taxable event).
If you hire a non-family member, you have to pay the minimum wage including various employment taxes based on the wages you pay. Failure to do so can get you in big trouble (serious fines, paying back taxes with interest, and even jail).
December 26, 2018 12:37 pm at 12:37 pm in reply to: Why do people get nervous when they fly? #1652195akupermaParticipantA professional pilot (meaning someone whose full time career is flying) is not a “private pilot” – even if he or she works for other than a major carrier. Someone who flies his own plane when he needs to travel, but is not a professional pilot is “private”.
akupermaParticipantThe non-denomination prayers would strike any Jew, except for a “Reform” of their so-called “Classical” wing, as being strictly Protestant. Everyone understood it as such, Jews and Catholics who were serious about their children’s religious upbringing avoided public schools. In the example cited above, note the language. Have you ever heard a Jew in Hebrew use the word “Thee” (an archaic English form with no equivalent in Hebrew)? In fact, did you ever hear of a Jewish school starting the day with such a prayer, in English. Indeed, most frum Jews never use the word “god” since to us it refers to someone like Thor or Zeus or some goyish entity. While most Jewish schools start with davening, our davening is totally different than their “prayers”.
akupermaParticipant1. Private planes have a much worse safety record than airlines. One reason is that private pilots don’t get as much experience as professional pilots, and few have sufficient funds to provide the same level of maintenance as airlines or the armed forces.
2. While planes may have a better safety record than surface transit, the liklihood of surviving an airplance crash is much less. Remember that if your car, bus or train develops mechanical trouble, you are at most delayed. If a plane develops mechanical problems in flight, it is likely to be fatal.
akupermaParticipantThe ban on prayer in pubic school is only on the government selecting and leading prayers. Students and teachers are free to pray to their heart’s content – but they can’t require others to join them. The standard for student prayer is “reasonable accommodation”. The past practice of having the teachers lead Protestant prayers was the problem.
akupermaParticipantDidn’t that happen naturally in the old days, when the life expectancy was under 40, and that was for those who survived infancy?
akupermaParticipantWhile Trump has alienated the “core” of the Republican party (which going back to Reagan favored an aggressive foreign policy, fiscal responsibility, free trade and support for immigration, if only as a source of cheap labor), Trump has his own base, and the Democrats appear more likely to pick a radical left-winger who will alienate much of the Democratic and Independent electorate. In an election that is about “the lesser of two evils”, it is hard to predict the outcome, and there is an opportunity for a middle-of-the-road third party sounding like what both major parties sounded like in the 20th century (when everyone complained they sounded alike).
December 23, 2018 2:34 pm at 2:34 pm in reply to: Is the MO community concerned with SED? Why the silence? #1649690akupermaParticipantThe issue of “government funding” is distinct from whether a Torah education meets the requirements for compulsory education. If the government doesn’t fund Jewish schools it means more crowded classrooms, higher tuition and lower pay for teachers. Given the principle of “he who pays the fiddler calls the tune”, it is dubious why we even want the government to pay for Torah education.
If the government requires students to attend secular schools that will indoctrinate them in a secular, anti-Torah, world view, it is a matter of יהרג ואל יעבור and if the Supreme Court uphold it (which I consider unlikely), it would mean the frum Jews would be forced to emigrate. The proposal in New York would result in children from frum homes being removed from those homes to be raised in a Torah environment since that is in the “best interests of the child.” This is therefore not an economic issue, but rather and existential issue.
December 21, 2018 8:09 am at 8:09 am in reply to: Is the MO community concerned with SED? Why the silence? #1649003akupermaParticipantIf the frummer yeshivos win, the more modern ones are covered. If the frummer ones lose, then the more modern ones can challenge law on different grounds (e.g. that they get better results than the public schools in secular subjects and that therefore the hours requriements are arbitrary and capricious). The frummer yeshivos will have to argue hat, either, 1) their achievement is equal or better than the minimum achievement required in the lowest-performing public schools, 2) that the academic requirements are arbitrary and capricious, 3) the whole concept of government regulation of parochial schools is unconstitutional.
December 20, 2018 4:24 pm at 4:24 pm in reply to: Gives loads of tzedaka, small raises to needy employees #1648732akupermaParticipantWages are determined by the law of supply and demand. If you deliberately overpay, that is a common form of tsadakkah, though the government gets annoyed when a frum business puts someone on the payroll for a “make work” job at a good wage (halachically, that is probably the best way to give tsadakkah since the recipient feels they are self-supporting, but it doesn’t mesh well with the internal revenue code).
December 17, 2018 2:15 pm at 2:15 pm in reply to: Let’s Register Our Children To Public School #1646056akupermaParticipantJoseph: The Blaine amendment, which is in many state constitutions, has been upheld frequently. It is based on the “establishment” clause, on the theory than any religious institution that is publicly funded becomes established.
And would you really want to have the government having a “Secretary of Religious Affairs” deciding which Rav would work in which shul, and what their Shabbos drasha would be. At the very least, government funded yeshivos would be required to toe the line ideologically, and that would be as bad as New York’s current plan to force yeshiovos to adopt secular, un-frum curricula.
December 16, 2018 1:01 pm at 1:01 pm in reply to: Let’s Register Our Children To Public School #1645486akupermaParticipantParents who are not concerned with their children growing up frum already send them to public school. It is what the seculars want. The suggestion is analagous to saying the solution to anti-semitism is to convert (which, it turns out, didn’t work too well, cf. the holocaust).
akupermaParticipantGiven that the Democrats appear to being taking a sharp turn to the left, rejecting the heritage of Bill Clinton (1992 version), Carter (1976 version), Johnson, Kennedy, Truman and Roosevelt, there isn’t much choice for Jews. We “cling to religion” (their words, not our’s), meaning we are deplorables to be crushed.
P.S. One probably shouldn’t blame Roosevelt for anti-Jewish policies that were supported by the American Jewish community (run by Reform Jews, who didn’t want hordes of Eastern European Jews dropping in). They actively lobbied against “rescue” (and surprise, their grandchildren are the ones who want to get rid of deplorable people who cling to old fashioned religion).
December 13, 2018 11:22 am at 11:22 am in reply to: If you could go back in time for one day what would you do?!?! #1644041akupermaParticipantKriyas Yam Suf or Har Sinai would be nice, but we’re addicted to modern technology (indoor plumbing, anti-biotics, pain killers, refrigeration, etc.).
If you buy the the low date before the Great Depression (in 1932), you have to wait a long time to max your profits (and the period of 1932-1948 is one period worth avoiding). If you buy in March 2009 and sell in September 2018, you maked a quick killing with the privations of the pre-tech world.
akupermaParticipantWell, if they robots are frum, why can’t they post?
December 9, 2018 4:11 pm at 4:11 pm in reply to: Specific stock picks amidst the current market volatility !!!!!!! #1639991akupermaParticipantGo long on Torah, short on gashmius.
December 7, 2018 8:36 am at 8:36 am in reply to: Why does it seem we downplay winning the battle? #1639167akupermaParticipant1. Ha-Shem got upset at us for being too happy when Ha-Shem drowned the Egyptians, so we are supposed to celebrate a war over the Greeks.
2. Most of the “Greeks” were OTD Yidden. Note the many parts of the “al ha-Nissim” that only make sense if you assume they were Jews (Tahorim over Tameiim – but goyim are neither, specificially saying we won over minim, not goyim, etc.). We should make a big deal over killing Yidden (even if they were OTD)???????
3. We won a battle but lost the war. That period in Jewish history ended with the Hellenized Romans destroying Yerusalayim.
edited for more respectful phraseology
December 3, 2018 2:00 pm at 2:00 pm in reply to: The Anti-Vaxxers are Causing a Chillul Hashem #1635975akupermaParticipantIf you are an Israeli citizen of draftable age, and you drop out of yeshiva, you have very few options other than to go into the army. It doesn’t take much “joining.” The decision to leave yeshiva learning for a young male of that age is, unless the man is seriously handicapped, a decision to enter the military. What other option would there be?
akupermaParticipantBecause many Americans can’t cope with the idea that something bad happened to them that they couldn’t prevent unless there is someone to blame (and more importantly, to sue). We Yidden say “הכל בידי שמים חוץ מיראת שמים” and accept that not everything in the universe is under our control, and sometimes bad things happen regardless of whatgever actions we take. Secular society doesn’t see it that way.
December 3, 2018 12:40 pm at 12:40 pm in reply to: The Anti-Vaxxers are Causing a Chillul Hashem #1635911akupermaParticipantDaasYachid: This is a problem, but not a Jewish problem. The anti-vaccine movement is broader throughout society, and is not specificially a “Jewish” issue. No one perceives this as a “Jewish” matter, except perhaps us. No one is claiming that there is an anti-vaccine Jewish perspective, and Jews are probably less likely than goyim to be avoiding vaccines.
Of course it is a matter that affects us, and of course it has historically been the responsibility of the rabbanim to provide leadership. But it isn’t really a matter of “hillul ha-Shem” any more than people catching any other disease is a matter of “hillul ha-Shem”.
December 3, 2018 8:09 am at 8:09 am in reply to: How should we as Jews mourn the loss of former president George h.w. bush? #1635641akupermaParticipant1. Old people normally die. It’s younger people dying we should get up set over.
2. Any who works for the Federal government (or is on a “Federal” schedule , common among contractors in the greater Washington era), gets Wednesday off so they can get to minyan without a hassle.
December 3, 2018 7:52 am at 7:52 am in reply to: The Anti-Vaxxers are Causing a Chillul Hashem #1635645akupermaParticipantThe vast majoriity of anti-vaxxers are goyim. No rabbanim are poskening against vaccines. While one can argue that otherwise frum Jews not following halacha is a “chillul Ha-Shem”, that would apply in many situations (e.g. use and abuse of the internet, which is where these anti-vaxxers appear to be getting their information from).
akupermaParticipantIf Trump first Mueller it would be an admission that Trump engaged in impeachable offenses. It would have the same effect as the “Saturday night massacre” in 1973. Trump’s best strategy for re-election would be to focus on showing the anti-Trump were on a witch hunt, and to make the “own” anything that goes wrong (see, the economy tanked, because you wouldn’t listen me but went into “resistance” and abusing rights). Trump will want to argue that Mueller’s witch-hunt threatens anyone who expresses politically incorrect views. He can discredit the Democrats charge that Trump is a Russian “manchurian candidate” by asking the Congress for a massive appropriation to assist the military in opposing Russian expansion.
The above is what is making many Democrats concerned, since much of their caucus is in “reistance mode” with a heart set on impeachment, and they remembered what happened in 1998 when the Republicans decided Clinton impeachable and the country didn’t agree.
akupermaParticipantJust out of curiousity, what Rabbanin and telling people not to vaccinate? Unless this is a dispute between different rabbanim on halacha, the debate is over some Baal ha-battim, obviously ignorant in the ways of the world (okay, with deficient secular educationwhich can be attributed to Jewish schools), who listen to fools on the internet and mistake it for wisdom.
akupermaParticipantNon-political: Jews traditionally regarded that the poor had an entitlement to be given tsadakkah, and those with the means had an obligation to provide it. The goyim borrowed the concept from us. Under American law, there are no economic entitlements. The constitution gives you rights to vote, free exercise of religion, right to a jury trial – those are entitlements. There are no entitlements to get money. Programs such as social security, medicare, medicaid, food stamps, WIC, etc., are pure charity. The government is under no obligation to give you the money, but has voted to do so (and could at any time stop doing so). While Jews (and some others) have managed to convince most Americans that it is a good thing to give “welfare” to those in need, it is purely a matter of getting most voters to feel charitable enough to divert their tax dollars. — What the Amreicans (fum Jews in particular) call “entitlements” are charitable programs whereby the government has stated anyone meeting a certain condition gets a set benefit, which is cheaper than requiring a special statute to be passed for each individual giving them a special benefit (which was done at one time, and proved unworkable).
akupermaParticipantWelfare goes back well before 1800. In western Europe it was the responsibility of religious groups to run the program and gradually the government took over. For many years “welfare” involved waiting until the person was down to the clothes on their back and nothing more, and giving them food and shelter in the “poor house”. The switch to “home relief” (giving them money so they stay in their houses) was largely 20th century, and has proven to be cost effective.
There is the halachic issue involving taking charity from goyim. There is also the issue of whether it is counter-productive to give people able to work money rather than jobs (this is best observed by noticing how employment among able-bodied persons over 65 has radically fallen since the government started paying them not to work, and continued even after unemployment ceased to be a condition of receiving social security). This is especially a problem now that most industrialized countries are facing serious labor shortages.
November 26, 2018 3:10 pm at 3:10 pm in reply to: Why Are Torah Observant Jews Overwhelmingly Republican/Conservative? #1630799akupermaParticipantRebYidd23: You identify with white nationalists and rapists??? Most of us identify with people raising families (man, woman, and their children), trying to support themselves, trying to raise the families in their own cultgural and religious traditions. And these are the people that the Democrats consider to be deplorables clinging to outmoded religious ideas.
November 26, 2018 12:47 pm at 12:47 pm in reply to: Why Are Torah Observant Jews Overwhelmingly Republican/Conservative? #1630638akupermaParticipantRebYidd23: We are deplorables. We cling to religion. Your comment reminds one of the famous line of a German who said at first they he didn’t object when they came for Jews since he wasn’t a Jew, and ends with him stating that when they came for him, there was no one left to object.
Our views on a wide variety of matters are totally incorrect by the left-wing (Democratic party, circa 2018) standard of political correctness. We reject that which “normal” people consider to be beyond question. Even if in economic matters we are closer to the Democrats (and we love entitlements, in fact, we invented them and the Democrats got the idea from us), the attack on halacha is a “game changer.” We could never tolerate a demand the synagogs not differentiate on the basis of gender, or that opposition to non-maritial sexual activites is equivalant to support racism (and thus a basis to close schools or deny tax exemption to institutions). We could never tolerate any restriction on bris milah. Our only hope for surviving in the United States, is that the Republicans so soundly crush the Democrats that the Democrats move away from their fanatical ultra-secular political correctness, and return to the “big tent” welcoming all minorities, including people like us, and including all religions, as was the case as little as a generation ago.
November 26, 2018 7:50 am at 7:50 am in reply to: Why Are Torah Observant Jews Overwhelmingly Republican/Conservative? #1630462akupermaParticipantBecause over the last 50 years the Democrats have become increasingly anti-religious, while the Republicans are increasingly welcoming to peoples of all religions. If the Democrats regard people who “clink to religion” to be “deplorables” (taking the words of their most recent national candidates, in context), don’t be shocked that the Democrats have problem attracting non-secular voters. Fifty years ago this was not the case.
akupermaParticipantAvi KL I am happy living outside of New York (in a Blue state, where the goyim are not predominantly secular Jews, which probably explains why they are malicious towards us). I see no difference between a frum Jew “Schnorring” than from anyone who accepts government subsidies such as social security, WIC, SNAP, medicare, medicaid, student loans, subsidized or free education, not to mention corporate welfare (e.g. Amazon). At least our tradition is to make the schnorrer do something for the money so they feel like totally worthless. I find the presence of neighbors who routinely deal in mass murder and cosnider it normal (i.e. the Arabs) much more threatening than an occasional nut case.
akupermaParticipant1. The frei Jews have always done everything they can to sabotage Torah, and this latest attempt in New York will fail either because they can’t apply a higher standard to frum schools than they apply to the worst public schools (equal protection), and may run into discrimination (first amendment, free exercise) matters as well. Any Yid who thought they could get the government to pay for yeshivos was being very naive and displayed ignorance of who government work (when they pay the fiddler, they always call the tune). It should be noted that America has two political camps, one of which is friendly to Yiddishkeit (the “reds”), and the other contains some elements (mainly frei Jews) who are anti-Semitic. At worse (or perhaps best), I suspect frum Jews will increasingly move out of New York to places that are cheaper to live in and where the ultra-secular fanatics have little political influence (and note the growth of yeshivos in “red” states in the last generation). The worst that will happen is you will have to listen to Hebrew spoken with a very un-New York drawl or twang.
2. Shootings such as Pittsburg are not unheard of in America, and have rarely been aimed at Jews. Given American’s origins as a refuge for excaped (and deported/exiled) criminals, and its founding by an act of armed rebellion against the lawful (and elected) government, one should not be shocked that America has always been relatively violent. Unlike Europe, that violence is not directed primarily at us.
3. Israel is run by a well-entrenched secular ruling class that sees our destruction as a primary goal. In addition the country is surrounded by well armed (but fortunately, highly disorganized and very inept) enemies who wish us dead and have been trying to kill as many Jews as possible for longer than most of us have been alive.
November 22, 2018 9:34 am at 9:34 am in reply to: Is it Mutar to celebrate Thanksgiving?!?!?!?!?!?! #1628920akupermaParticipantThe origin and text of the (not legally binding) proclamation each year clearly suggest a religious order. The question needs to be asked that if goyim hold a yuntuf in order to (and to give thanks to) the Ribbono Shel Olam (and make a point of not mentioning any false gods, but clearly giving thanks to Ha-Shem) if the prohibition of avodah zarah applied.
If at some point the Americans elect an openly atheist President, who says the holiday is to celebrate prosperity by shopping, with no reference thanking anyone other than themselves, it would clearly no longer be Avodah Zarah. So perhaps by 2021 if the Democrat’s Blue Wave turns American into a socialist paradise, we won’t have a shailoh.
November 20, 2018 9:47 am at 9:47 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨🔬💉🚫 #1626679akupermaParticipantMaybe parents who don’t care enough to get vaccinations are less inclined to take their children to a doctor for any reason. If someone distrusts doctors in general, they are not likely to take a sick (as opposed to injured) child to the ER. Indeed, one can suggest that two should correlate since the core factor is distrust of standard medicine.
Death rates might be more interesting since statistics for child mortality aren’t directly a function of parent attitudes.
akupermaParticipantPeople who reject modern technology and dream of the “good old days” in the past in general know very little about what life was like in the “good old days.” They usually don’t tell people in history that 200 years ago most children died, the leading cause of death for women was complications from childbirth, that all the food one atge was locally growned and if there was a bad harvest you starved. And we won’t even get into such matters that in the 20th century, the leading cause of infant mortality among Jews was getting murdered by goyim.
akupermaParticipantAnd all this modern medicine complicates life. A major factor in the rise in divorces is due to medical care (previously, few marriages lasted more than ten years before one of the spouses died – if you didn’t like yhour spouse you could reasonably expect to be rid of each in the foreseeable future). And then there is the problem of overcrowding in schools – until recently most chidlren died before reaching school age, reducing class size significantly (just look at a typical class and imagine how uncrowded it would in half the students weren’t there). And supporting old people is becoming a global crisis, almost totally the fault of the medical profession which has raised life expectancy by several decades over the last century.
November 7, 2018 10:32 am at 10:32 am in reply to: Election Results 2018 — Republicans Do Better Than Expected #1618730akupermaParticipantThe anti-Trump media proclaimed a “blue wave”, which did not happen. The Republicans did as well as would normally be expected if one didn’t listen to the “Resistance” (and the “Resistance” generally only listens to itself). Given the excessive number of Democrats in the group of Senators running (due to the results in 2006 and 2012, both good years for Democrats), the Democrats should have had lower expectations to begin with.
The bottom line is the government may have to be more frugal since approval of both parties is needed to spend anything, or to change taxes – but that Trump can appoint people he likes to the courts with ease (meaning more originalists focusing on the text of the law, rather than on policy issues).
-
AuthorPosts