akuperma

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,001 through 1,050 (of 3,415 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Despicable Middos of our Hero #1786545
    akuperma
    Participant

    Trump is not “our hero”. He’s the least annoyng alternative. A lot of the social conservatives and neo-cons are our friends, but they were all unelectable. The Democrats have been taken over by anti-Semities, the friendliest of which only want to get rid of frum Jews, and the worst are little better than Nazis.

    and to the original poster, the United States does not have a Rosh Memshalah, since we have separation of powers. All we have is a Head of State (an office based on the British kings of the 18th century). Ther is no “memshalah” in our system, only an executive and an independent legislature. You should get a book on civics before discussing a government you apparently don’t understand.

    in reply to: Eida Charedis Against Participating in Knesses Elections #1786226
    akuperma
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: 1. Civil disobedience. 2. Appeals to international human rights law. 3. Once you decide that all zionists are inherently opposed to Torah (not just those who claim to be anti-Torah, but even those who claim they are Torah observant), it is largely irrelevant to participate in Israeli elections since the zionists have a solid lock on the electoral system, and by participating in the elections it allows the zionists to claim that they to represent the hareidim (i.e. the anti-zionist hareidim). Note that the Arabs have a similar problem, and note how the zionists point to Palestinian participation in the kenesset as proof of Arab support for the medinah.

    in reply to: Eida Charedis Against Participating in Knesses Elections #1786000
    akuperma
    Participant

    That’s been their policy for almost 100 years (before then, there were no elections). No hiddush.

    in reply to: Internet: The biggest source of brocha in the last generations. #1784547
    akuperma
    Participant

    This may come as a shock to you children, but people got along fine before the internet. People bought and sold goods. They followed the news. THey invested. THey entertained themselves. They even knew how to communicate in writing and by talking to each other.

    If you want to discuss an invention that really improved life, consider antibiotics, anesthetics for surgery, indoor plumbing (toilets), and refrigeration.

    in reply to: Whats the worst thing about smartphones #1784544
    akuperma
    Participant

    The content isn’t a problem, as it is the same content on any computer system. The problem is that individuals are spending all their time staring at the phone rather than engaging in normal human activities. In the case of children, this is especially problematic and detrimental to their education. These problems have been observed and complained about in almost all cultures, and is not a uniquely “Jewish” issue. Indeed, since frum Jews manage to turn off their smartphones one day a week gives us a special advantage since even the most addicted frummie still knows he or she can survive without the online connections 24/7.

    in reply to: Your 21 year old son may be ready for marriage #1782078
    akuperma
    Participant

    I question whether anyone has the knowledge and experience for marriage until they are well past middle age. Fortunately, Ha-Shem “programmed” people to get married well before they are ready, thereby giving all the kids a “learning experience” and securing the future of the human race.

    in reply to: Apostates in Trump’s orbit #1779192
    akuperma
    Participant

    Given the historically unprecedented integration of American Jews, and the mass assimilation over the past few centuries, any and all American politicians are likely to have supporters who are Orthodox Jews, and who are religiously non-Jewish descendants of Jews (some of are, or are not, halachically Jewish). Some are Republicans and some are Democrats (not to mention that one of the leading Democratic candidates to oppose Trump is a well known heretic who is almost certainly Jewish according to halacha).

    in reply to: The quick get #1776301
    akuperma
    Participant

    If the husband and wife are all in agreement BEFORE they talk to rabbis or lawyers, and no one is pulling any shtick, everything goes smoothly and quickly. Though (to ever lasting joy of the matrimonial bar) few couples are that agreeabled about getting divorced. Things like the “get” law assume lack of mutual agreement.

    in reply to: The quick get #1776178
    akuperma
    Participant

    If the husband and wife are in agreement on all issues, the process of the “Get” and the government’s divorce is quick, easy and not expensive. Unfortunately (well, for lawyers, fortunately) that is not the case in most divorces.

    in reply to: Recession is all the Democrats fault! #1775764
    akuperma
    Participant

    jackk: Finally PROOF the Trump has finally learned how to be a politician, in the fine tradition of all the other politicians that have led the republic for the last 200+ years. He really is turning NORMAL (unfortunately).

    in reply to: Recession is all the Democrats fault! #1775718
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. The last recessionwas caused by the Democrats encouraging banks to make sub-prime loans, not that the Republicans not the banks objected.

    2. The current slowdown is connected with the disruption on world trade caused by the Americans with great help from the British and the Chinese. Whether the disruption of world trade is a bad thing is yet to be seen. According to standard economic theory trade is good and helps all, but many are skeptical (particularly American workers who have trouble competing with low wage countries), and as of late, conventional economic theory has been very good at predicting or explaining economic behavior.

    in reply to: Should citizens be able to adopt non-citizens at the border? #1775497
    akuperma
    Participant

    Adoption is a complex legal proceeding involving terminating the adoptees relationships to their family.

    In the past refugees needed sponsors. Most of the people attempting to immigrate now are looking for jobs and are quite ready and able to work, so there is really no economic issue. Labor force participation by new immigrants is well above average. While increased immigration is good for business, it forces down wages by increasing the supply of labor, which is why there is much opposition.

    in reply to: Interior Decorating in the Shtetl #1775321
    akuperma
    Participant

    People have ALWAYS and in every country tried as best they can to make their homes “nice”. In America (and much of the modern worlds) we have more “specialists” since we have a larger supply of labor and the affluence to develop specialties. In pre-modern Eastern Europe the standard of living was much lower, and the supply of labor such that few people could specialize in interior decorating (something to do with most women being tied down with house work due to the low level of technology).

    in reply to: Child Victims Act now in effect in NYS #1774822
    akuperma
    Participant

    The major impact will be on very old cases where an emplyer is being sued for what an now deceased employee is alleged to have done, with no way to prove or disprove matters. The lawyer gets paid off since it cheaper to buy off the lawyer than to litigate, the “victim” gets some money, the dead person is dead. Very good deal for the lawyer. Some could argue that lawyers are an economic growth engine…..

    in reply to: Elon Musk’s Shabbos Car #1772983
    akuperma
    Participant

    In many cities you need to “swipe” to get out, and in most cities in America farecards are used so you would have to discard a farecard since you couldn’t carry it home (presumably you would buy a special farecard for leaving late Friday). You would have an additional problem of electronic devices connected to the exit turnstyle counting who is leaving. Also you would have to be careful to avoid getting caught in a door as that would trigger an electronic device.

    I suggest taking the subway home on Friday evening is best left for alternative history novels in which Jews have to be pretending not to be Jews to survive.

    in reply to: Elon Musk’s Shabbos Car #1772761
    akuperma
    Participant

    RE: Taking a train on Shabbos.
    Assume the “good old days” when you paid when you got on and could discard the ticket (or didn’t have one if a farebox was used and you paid with a coin or token), and assuming the train is operated by goyim, it would be possible to board a train before Shabbos (boarding after Shabbos would at the least require a Shabbos goy to pay your fare), and get off assuming you were on a train that made all stops so it would be opening the doors at your stop even in no one was getting on or off, and you were already Shabbos-dik, meaning not carrying anything. Under these conditions using the train to get home on Shabbos would probably be an option and I believe it was used fairly often in the “bad old days” before legislation 50 years ago introduced “reasonable accomodation” into American law. Today in that situation one has a problem since transit systems often require you to have a card to exit, and you would never be able to carry a fare card since it is clearly a cash equivalent.

    An car or bus would not be similar since it would require adjust for number of passengers (knowing who connected a seat belt, avoiding smashing people when the door closes) and once the car is reacting to your presence it becomes an issue (unless one holds that elecronic automated systems are inherently legal on Shabbos, which is problamatic to say the least).

    in reply to: Elon Musk’s Shabbos Car #1772663
    akuperma
    Participant

    philosopher: A lighting fixture, with or without a Shabbos clock, does the same amount of work with or without you doing anything. A light does not burn brighter if someone is, or is not, using it. Appliances with a Shabbos mode that turn off at predicted time so they can be opened (which increases activity) also “solve” the problem.

    A self-driving car, even if set on clock that causes the doors to open and close at certain times regardless of whether anyone is getting in or out, and travel only on a fixed route (even if empty) would still raise an issue since the motor would have to do more work based on the number of humans involved (one should now ask if a “Shabbos mode” refrigerator or oven uses a thermostat which would mean the heavier use put on it the more the motor runs. This will lead to a debate on whether one can use a robotic Shabbos goy.

    It should be noted the some reputable people that using electricity does not violate “mavir” and if one holds that way, the only objection to using an electric car or an ebook would be that it isn’t “Shabbos-dik” (shvus).

    in reply to: Elon Musk’s Shabbos Car #1772623
    akuperma
    Participant

    If you hold that turning electricity on and off is the equivalent of burning (since the wires and machinery heat up, and eventually are consumed), then the answer is clearly “not allowed” (that being the case, you probably don’t use a “Shabbos elevator” and are not thrilled with modern refrigerators or ovens that increase their level of function in response to what users do).

    If you hold that electricity is not equivalent of burning, then the only object is “shvus”, you comfortably use a Shabbos elevator, you will probably allow use of an e-book (at least for learning and davening), and you’ll have no problems of using electric devices such as self-driving cars, and perhaps many more robotic appliances that don’t exist yet. You probably would be able to tell your self-driving car “take me out to ballgame” and drop me off by the main gate, and pay for entrance with an electronic device that doesn’t involve writing (e-tickets already exist),

    The use of Shabbos elevators, and appliances that react to use, is the beginning of a “slippery slop” and that there will eventually be a divide between those that allow electric devices, including self-driving cars and ebooks, and those that don’t.

    in reply to: Would I get caught? #1772097
    akuperma
    Participant

    Coyotes and Jackals (and wolves) and dogs are really one species. They can mate and produce fertile offspring.

    in reply to: GGWG Militia #1771793
    akuperma
    Participant

    RebYidd23: Militias are always paid. And they tend to be quite expensive. That’s a feature not a bug. If you don’t pay people, you are limited to rich dudes doing something as a hobby. Very few people would undertake dangerous work without being compensated.

    If you feel a need for more police, you are free to vote for a government that hires more police, and taxes the citizens to pay for it. In a democracy, that is for the people to choose. It should be noted that the ethnic group most victimized by crime, and most likely to be victims of crime, are African Americans, who in general do not favor increased spending on police.

    in reply to: 0% unemployment rate- good or bad? #1771665
    akuperma
    Participant

    Very low unemployment means employers have to raise wages to attract workers, which causes inflation and may force some business to close. It also makes it hard for the economy to grow since expansion requires workers. A factor in the US is Trump;s anti-immigration policy which deprives the economy of cheap labor. A serious problem is that the US is now in the period of the “boomers” (born 1946 and onwards) quitting the job markets, and the boomers turned out as a group (frum community excepted) to have been total failures at producing a new generation, dooming the US to a prolonged period of economic decline unless something can be taken to make up for the babies the boomers didn’t have (e.g. robots, immigrants, coercing people to work well beyond retirement age, etc. – note that the Europeans and East Asians have the same problem, suggesting it won’t be the Russians, Chinese or EU that ends up stealing our lunch).

    in reply to: GGWG Militia #1771525
    akuperma
    Participant

    “GGWG” – a not widely used abbreviation for “Good guys with guns”

    That is already done. It’s called the “police”. Sometimes it is effective and sometimes it isn’t. And there is much dispute over whether the police are the “good guys”.

    in reply to: Looking for a Sefer about Jewish Names #1770747
    akuperma
    Participant

    There are many books on Jewish names, including both forenames (personal names) and surnames (family names). Some are for people who are just curious, some are written to facilitate writing a “get”, and there are one or two for librarians.

    In a library catalogue, or even online since many library resources are in Google, look for “Names Personal — Jewish” as well as “Names, Personal (Jewish law)”.

    in reply to: $15 an Hour Minimum Wage #1770588
    akuperma
    Participant

    The impact of a $15 minimum wage will depend on the local economy. If in a given place, a worker can produce $15 or added profit every hour (actually the number is more like $20 due to taxes and benefits), the company will get rid of him. In New York or San Francisco wages and living costs are high, but in much of the country few unskilled workers can produce $20/hour of extra profit, and their livlihood will be in jeapordy.

    in reply to: 3-Day Weekends – Global Impact (more info in OP) #1769564
    akuperma
    Participant

    There is more evidence of moving to a Friday-Saturday-Sunday three day weekend (or rather a Monday-Thursday four day workweek).

    Note that Christians in the past observed Sunday in a more sabbath-like manner with enforced prohibitions on work. The two day weekend was introduced by Franklin Roosevelt in an effort to reduce unemployment by reducing the work week and forcing employers to make up for lost hours by hiring more employees.

    in reply to: Is Social Security a Ponzi scheme? #1764993
    akuperma
    Participant

    What is fraudulent about Social Security is claiming it is an investment or insurance scheme, when in fact it is a government welfare/pension program paid out of current revenue. The bookkeeping was designed to get around the fact that the Constitution never authorized a payroll tax, and arguably doesn’t authorize a national welfare or pension scheme. If someone believes it is an investment program or an insurance scheme they are deluded. If you realize it is a government welfare program paid for by taxes (and “borrowing”, i.e. “Printing money”)l, you have nothing to worry about.

    in reply to: Is Social Security a Ponzi scheme? #1763587
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. The government has never guaranteed that benefits or fees (payroll taxes) will never change. They have changed substantially over time (not surprising incomes have risen radically in the last 80 years, as had life expectancy). There are no legal impediments to the government reducing benefits, changing the formula, or raising payroll taxes. Indeed, if they changed the retirement age relative to life expectany back to what it was 80 years, the new retirement age would probably be close to 80 and the system would be overflowing with money.

    2. The Federal government owns the “printing press” (ability to create new money without backing) meaning a debt guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the Federal government is secure in the amount of the debt, albeit no guarantee what the money will be worth.

    3. Given the America is a democracy, and the percentage of people over 65 is steadily rising (due to longer life expectancy and the inability of the younger generation to reproduce successfully), politically the response to shortfalls in the social security “trust fund” is likely to be keeping it solvent.

    in reply to: DO WE REALLY HAVE A GOOD EXCUSE TO LIVE IN CHUTZ LA'ARETZ? #1763286
    akuperma
    Participant

    Given that Israel is now a “first world” country, there are no economic excuses. One might need to stay in golus to take care of one’s parents, and if you are hard core anti-zionists (enough that the Israelis would arrest you for opposing the state, e.g. refusing army service) that would qualify. Any who is pro-zionist but lives in golus in the 21st century is a hypocrite.

    in reply to: What’ is a “Person of Color”? #1762087
    akuperma
    Participant

    Originally “Colored” was the polite way to say “Black”. Today Black politicians use the phrase in order to make their group seem bigger. Various other groups defined as non-white use the phrase to argue they are really oppressed. One problem is that some persons of European ancestry are darker than many “people of color”. The biggest problem is that when you average in American born Hispanics and especially Asians, the average suggests “People of color” have the same economic level as “Whites”, thereby roving that racial discrimination is NOT a major factor in America.

    Like all “racial” terms, one should assume the users are fools and racists, and also probable anti-religious (since on a fundamental level they are rejecting the idea that HaShem created the human race and that all people are closely related).

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760285
    akuperma
    Participant

    Racism is legal, but discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, race or religion is illegal. Discrimination based on political views is not merely legal, but is a constitutional right. We can expect that under the Democrats should they come to power, anti-semitism will be considered political and protected, but criticizing the Democrats (being the party of color) will be defined as racially discriminatory and be prosecuted. If Trump manages to lose in 2020, we non-assimilated Jews will be in big trouble.

    in reply to: Jewish music with english words=Goyish. #1760124
    akuperma
    Participant

    Are sure that the Jewish dialect of “Brooklynese” is still English, or is it a new dialect of English, similar to how the Jewish dialect of German became Yiddish. Note that most Jews considered Yiddish to be be German until World War II. So why isn’t “Judeo-English” a kosher Jewish language, just like Judeo-German and Judeo-Spanish

    Or are you saying Jewish songs have to be in Hebrew, to the exclusion of Yiddish, Ladino, Aramaic, etc.

    akuperma
    Participant

    Is there a reason why major papers such as the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post are not reporting on such “sweeps”. It seems like the “sweeps” are FAKE NEWS.

    And as a lawyer, the author of the original post should be supporting changing laws rather than ignoring them. Once you ignore laws you open a “Pandora’s box”. Perhaps the next law the government will ignore might be the one protecting Jews from assault (cf Europe).

    in reply to: Does Israel need a 3 State Solution #1757634
    akuperma
    Participant

    1, The first wave of Ashkenazim moved in the same time as the first wave of Sefardim, as soon as the Muslims defeated the Crusaders, and allowed Yidden to move back into Eretz Yisrael (which thanks to the Crusaders had become Judenrein for the first time).

    2. The Hareidim were quite content to live under Muslim rule, and indeed the early zionists didn’t object to the Ottomans. My guess is if the Hareidim become a majority of the non-Palestinian population (I didn’t say “Jewish” since an increasing number of Israeli “Jews” are actually goyim), they will cut a deal to end the war. Before this happens, probaby by the end of the 21st century, the zionists will probably make an effort toget rid of the hareidim, one way or another.

    in reply to: Should we be medicating our kids? #1756732
    akuperma
    Participant

    If a kid isn’t diseased, why give them drugs?

    in reply to: MUSIC BY YIDDEN #1753398
    akuperma
    Participant

    For the last few centuries, halacha developed “Haseges gevul” as a form of copyright, which along with Dina Malchusa Dina makes “stealing” music against halacha. Also when the music is initially sold the buyer agrees not to redistribute it (same if one goes to a concert and makes a private recording, contrary to the terms and conditions of the ticket).

    And BTW, the vast majority of the goyim in the performing arts are anything but rich.

    in reply to: Is Israel a Democratic country with a good economy? #1753356
    akuperma
    Participant

    Avi K: If you consider Eretz Yisrael to be Israel, then the Palestinians being non-citizens is similar to how Blacks were non-citizens of the USA prior to 1865, or how Jews were non-citizens of most countries until the 19th or 20th centuries. Israel requires Chareidim who wish to be part of the economy to modify their Torah observance, which is no different than what was the case for thousands of years (if only Jews would give up their religion, they could be rich like goyim). And the truth is that if most Palestinians and Afr-Asian Jews outside the big cities wanted to move into upper class housing in Tel Aviv, they wouldn’t be allowed since the lack the money – the economy is Israel’s “periphery” is very third world, still.

    in reply to: learning from an artscroll #1753230
    akuperma
    Participant

    Aramaic and Hebrew are closely related, similar to French and Spanish, or German and Yiddish. Hebrew is as different from English, as English is from Chinese or Navaho or Zulu.

    If you are serious about learning Torah, learn Hebrew.

    in reply to: learning from an artscroll #1753193
    akuperma
    Participant

    Traduttore, traditore

    While Art Scroll (in English) is useful for looking up words in context, the very act of translating Hebrew thoroughly distorts it. ArtScroll’s commentary is very useful, but if you can’t read the original text you are missing a lot. English and Hebrew are about as unrelated as any two languages with radically different grammar. The Hebrew artscroll is an interest commentary, but might be more affordable if published without the gemara.

    in reply to: Should Chareidim Form a Government with the Left? #1753080
    akuperma
    Participant

    The left has had that option for years. While some Hareidim are super-hawks, others are super-doves. On most economic issues, the hareidim are much closer to the left than the right, and in fact hareidim views are to the left of most Israeli socialists (all for liberal benefits, especially for large families, and not at all concerned with paying for them). However the Israeli left tends to be fanatically anti-religious (remember that an “ikar” of socialism is militant opposition to all forms of religion).

    in reply to: Is Israel a Democratic country with a good economy? #1752780
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. If you define “democracy” as a government based on free elections where the winner of the elections runs the country, Israel is clearly a democracy. There are two caveats. One is that if one considers “Eretz Yisrael” rather than “Medinat Yisrael”, Israel is clearly not a democracy since about 40% of the inhabitants (the Palestinians not holding Israeli citizenship) can’t vote. Second, many Israeli use the word “democratic” to mean “secular” and Israel is not exactly a secular state sine much of its culture and laws reflects Jewish perspectives.

    2. Economically, Israel is now considered to be a developed country, though as is the case in many countries, not everyone gets to benefit. The Upper class tend to be secular and westernized, with the result that many Israelis are “left out” of the mainstream economy, and left trapped in the “third world” economy of the frum communities, the peripheral communities and the Palestinian Arab communities. Israel has one of the most unequal distributions of wealth of any of the developed countries (unlike 70 years ago, when Israel was clearly a developing country, but with very little economic inequality).

    in reply to: Getting over Android Game addiction #1747216
    akuperma
    Participant

    One should purchase electronic devices with “off” switches.

    in reply to: What are yerushalmis and their origins ? #1746824
    akuperma
    Participant

    Yidden have been moving in and out of Yerusalayim ever the the Arabs reconquered the place and let us back in (the Christians had wiped out the previous community). There was a big wave on East Europeans in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, which has set the tone for both the Hasidische and Misnagdid communities.

    in reply to: AOC on Concentration Camps… What??? #1745230
    akuperma
    Participant

    I believe she fully understands what the German concentration camps were like, and is deliberately defaming President Trump in accordance with the Democratic Party’s stated program of “resistance” the allows false and vicious accusations, relying on overly liberal American laws that make it very hard for a public figure to sue even over obvious falsehoods. Falsely stating that Trump is murdering thousands of Hispanics is all “fair” to Democrats who believe that getting rid of Trump “trumps” truthfulness. Unfortuately, there are many Americans quite willing to believe any lie they hear about Trump.

    akuperma
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah: “The number one topic of conversation at every dinner party I’ve been to lately is which bracha to make ” — WHICH IS WHY Jews traditionally make bread the first course, so you don’t have to worry about brachos after the ha-Motsi

    akuperma
    Participant

    If everyone at the table was expected to wash, as is the case on Shabbos and yuntuf, no need to tell people. However if it is a meal at which not everyone is eating bread, you need to tell people so they know which bracha to make. The same would apply anytime you serve something that looks like bread or mezonos, but isn’t.

    in reply to: Smartphone vs. Ears #1744870
    akuperma
    Participant

    Ears are so 20th century — they went out of style along with eyes and brains. We are in the 21st century – smart devices to all your hearing, seeing and thinking for you. If we don’t adapt, the goyim will think we are quaint and old fashioned.

    in reply to: Quebec Secularism -more accurately Neutralism Law #1744800
    akuperma
    Participant

    A bigot is a bigot, no matter whether he claims he is scientifically justified or acting under neutral principles. Whether he the social norm is secularism or Islam or Christianity or Socialism or whatever. The reason you pass laws targeting groups you dislike is hatred. Any government makes hatred towards Jews a public policy is an existential threat. It is likely the rest of Canada will not support Quebec on this, but that remains to be seen.

    in reply to: Credit Card “Shtick/Fraud” – is it stealing? #1744201
    akuperma
    Participant

    If you have to ask, you know the answer is “no”.

    in reply to: Are sfardim from the 10 shvatim #1744012
    akuperma
    Participant

    The split between Sefardim and Ashkenazim occured well after the the 10 shvatim went missing.

    in reply to: BTL #1743973
    akuperma
    Participant

    To CTLawyer: Law schools don’t usually offer Financial aid,

    I believe that has changed, particularly for the non-elite law schools who want to fill a class with students likely to bring credit to the school. They might offers significant “scholarships” to a big chunk (perhaps 20% of the class), but require a certain grade point average to keep the scholarship after the first year, with that grade point average being such that at most 10% will qualify (in other contexts this is called “bait and switch”). With non-elite private law schools having trouble filling all seats, they optimize revenue by discounting (offering scholarships) so long as the revenue they still get exceeds marginal costs.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,001 through 1,050 (of 3,415 total)