akuperma

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 3,412 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Deep trouble ahead for the yeshivas under Biden #1919629
    akuperma
    Participant

    Yeshiva autonomy is protected by the Constitution (under the Right to Privacy, giving parents the right to educate their children). If an originalist Supreme Court throws out the Right to Privacy, Congress would probably enact it as a statute, or propose a constitutional amendment.

    Government funding from goyim is always dubious and any yeshiva that depends on goyim to stay solvent is taking a big risk. If the government were to tie funding for yeshivos to hiring unionized teachers for secular studies, most of the modern Orthodox would be very pleased.

    Given the results of the Congressional elections, Biden is unlikely to do anything especially radical about any policy.

    in reply to: election campaign spending #1919438
    akuperma
    Participant

    Charliehall: What’s wrong with political spending. Both parties have oodles of money. There is no close correlation between having lots of money and winning elections. While groups such as the Libertarians, the Greens, etc., do suffer for lack of money, if there ideas ever became mainstream they would have no trouble getting money.

    Would really prefer a country where rich people spent their money on living well, rather than on being concerned enough with the welfare of all to get involved in politics? Better they spend money on politics that looking for for $1K bottles of wine, caviar, parties costing millions of dollars, etc. Give people like Soros and the Koch brothers credit – no one makes them spend money to discuss public matters, and it is good for society that they do so.

    If you really don’t like campaign spending, I suggest you try North Korea. The Kim family has been winning elections, often with over 100% of the vote, for almost 75 years – and without wasting any money on campaign spending.

    in reply to: Will Biden Throw Israel Under the Bus? #1919293
    akuperma
    Participant

    Biden is unlikely to be sympathetic to Turkey or Iran. With almost all the Arab countries have thrown the Palestinians under the bus, the change in regime in America won’t matter all that much. Most of the Arabs have decided that the Israelis are less of a problem than the imperialistic ambitions of Turkey (the former colonial power) and Iran.

    in reply to: Why Trump lost #1919292
    akuperma
    Participant

    The strongest evidence against fraud is the lack of a “Blue wave”. The Democrats did very poorly in the congressional elections, in state elections and in referenda. In the past, ballot stuffers never split their tickets. It defied belief to think the Democrats “stole” the presidential election, will giving away meaningful control of the Congress and state legislatures in order to cover their tracks.

    in reply to: election campaign spending #1919164
    akuperma
    Participant

    This is a feature. It is good that people with money to spend, spend it on public affairs. If the rich weren’t interested in politics, and spent their money on “wine, women and song”, we would have a society that was less free and less vibrant.

    in reply to: Why Trump lost #1919143
    akuperma
    Participant

    Trump was rude and insulted many people. Based on the returns in congressional and state elections, and referenda (even California voted for conservative positions on affirmative action, labor laws and taxes), the Republicans would have won based on ideology. Trump’s thoughtless twittering and vulgarity was the difference.

    in reply to: Could someone explain it to a non American please…? #1917799
    akuperma
    Participant

    The media relied in the past on sophisticated sampling techniques that started breaking down when cell phones started to replace landlines, and collapsed totally due to the high percentage of people using mail-in ballots (which in the past were largely limited to people who couldn’t get to the polling place on the election day).

    The US is hardly along among federations of choosing a head of state in a system designed so one region can’t force its candidate on the country over the objection of other reasons. The Democrats are very popular in the urban areas along the coasts, and the Republicans are the leading party in the rest of the country.

    in reply to: Trump teva #1916771
    akuperma
    Participant

    Based on how the Republicans did in the Congressional races, Trump should have one easily, instead of winning or losing by fractions of a percent in a single state. Insulting part of the audience might work for some entertainers, but not for politicians. The lesson will be learned that politicians should not let their mouth (and twittering fingers) run independent of their brains – a skill that most politicians and persons in “corporate life” learned, but that Trump (who never had to deal with an independent board of directors or stockholders or anyone else he had to answer to) never learned.

    The people who plan to riot would riot if Trump or Biden win, so unless you believe they are angry Libertarians or Greens, the “violence” the media is rooting for (violence earns clicks) is not related to the election.

    in reply to: American Democracy #1916734
    akuperma
    Participant

    Democracy is supposed to be noisy and argumentative. It’s a feature, not a bug. It’s just like the people. If the Americans were quiet and mild mannered (somewhat like sheep), you would have very dull elections. But Americans tend to take things seriously about the country they run. This is a good thing. Remember that except for the Blacks and the Indians, Americans (including Blacks and Indians who migrated here from other countries), left their previous residence because they weren’t content to be sheep, and were annoyed with the sheep dogs, and wanted to move somewhere where they could become wolves, so of course they do a lot howling.

    If you want a place where elections are quiet and well mannered, and all the politicians say things that everyone says they agree with, try North Korea.

    in reply to: Halachic Ramifications of Killing Whilst in the Military #1915216
    akuperma
    Participant

    If he murders a civilian as part of a military sponsored program of ethnic cleansing (genocide), I would say yes.

    If he kills an enemy soldier who is trying to kill him, and whose army is engaged in aggression, almost certainly not.

    What about killing civilians as part of a program to destroy the enemy’s ability to fight (e.g. bombing enemy cities as was done in World War II)? What about killing an enemy soldier when the enemy country can rightly claim to be defending itself from a rodef (i.e. our soldier’s country)? What about a soldier ordered to destroy property as retaliation or engage in sexual attacks on enemy civilians?

    in reply to: Sheitels are now BANNED!!! #1914771
    akuperma
    Participant

    The only issue of “tonsuring” would occur traditionally with Christian monks where the haircut was part of becoming a monk. There is no tradition of objecting to people selling their hair for money based on what they wanted to use the money for (whether it was to buy food, or give to the poor, or donate to an avodah zarah). If we object to someone doing something to earn money in order to donate the money to avodah zarah, it would be very difficult to ever hire or buy things from non-Jews, since by doing business with them, we would be indirectly supporting their avodah zarah (or other nefarious practices).

    in reply to: RIGHT WING LEFT WING BLABLABLA #1914768
    akuperma
    Participant

    “Right” and “Left” refer to the sides of the French National Assembly during the latge 18th century. While there were plenty of Jews in France, they weren’t allowed to vote or hold public office until later.
    This world’s politics can be entertaining, but this is only the “prozdor”, not the real thing. Blink your eyes, and it will go gone for good. Rooting for Trump or Biden is fun, just like hopeing for the Mets to play the Orioles in the World Series, but at the end of the day, it doesn’t really matter.

    in reply to: Finding out who won the presidential election 2020 #1914670
    akuperma
    Participant

    It is up to each state to decide. Under Federal law, the state legislature is free to appoint electors without regard to how people vote. It is merely a “minhag” to let votes choose the electors. If New Jersey votes choose the Republicans, it is perfectly legal for the state legislature to choose Democrats. And under the Constitution, Nancy Pelosi will be the one counting votes.

    About the only thing the Constitution bans is a state can’t become a monarchy, and can’t limit the right to vote based on several factors – but there is no prohibition of election fraud, and in many blue states it is a well established minhag (Boss Daley, Tammany Hall, “Vote early and often”).

    in reply to: New Conservative Supreme Court Supermajority #1914552
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. The only conservative in Chief Justice Roberts. There are five originalists, but that doesn’t guarantee a right wing decision, not would it necessarily be good for Jews. The anti-test act clause never was understood as requiring religious accommodation, and the first amendment was understood to protect belief not practice, and if the originalists take a look at the 14th amendment, they may object to it having been expanded beyond protecting the rights of ex-slaves and their descendants (bad for religious minorities). And the right to privacy, which is the basis of allowing “sexual freedom” is also the basis for laws allowing parents to control the religious upbringing of children – and that right isn’t written in the constitution.

    2. It only takes a simple statute to turn a 6-3 majority into a 7-6 minority. Plus the Congress and the blue states can probably manipulate things to restrict the ability of the Supreme Court in ideological matters (e.g. making abortion a matter of state rights and prohibiting anyone from traveling to a blue state for an abortion).

    in reply to: Is hydroxychloroquine really proven ineffective?? #1912936
    akuperma
    Participant

    The statistics for all the drugs so far suggest that many are effective in some situations, but none are a “cure” (i.e. nothing is to the virus, what antibiotics are for germs). If you are infected with Covid19, the best hope is to daven that you are in the 95% who either don’t notice, or can get by with non-prescription medicines and chicken soup. Remember that a coronavirus is more or less a “cold” (except one that are rare occasions makes you dangerously ill), and no one has ever “found a cure for the common cold”.

    in reply to: Biden would Radically Change the Courts #1912898
    akuperma
    Participant

    Politics influence courts. That is how politics works. For almost 250 years, American have considered having judges chosen by politicians to be a serious feature, not a bug. In fact, in many states, most judges are elected. In practice, an independent judiciary would mean one controlled by the leading law firms and law schools, reflect the upper class (in America, the 1%, largely reflect Wall Street and Silicone Valley at the expense of the rest of society).

    in reply to: Mentioning a person “dies of Covid” in headline #1912641
    akuperma
    Participant

    The goal of mass media is to encourage people to panic and feel that something horrible is going on. That is what, as they used to say “sells newspapers” (in 21st century, “motivates clicks”). If people realized that the death rate due to Covid19 is under 1 in 1000, and compared that to the “normal” death rate in America which is roughly 8 per 1000, and that most of the deaths are of people who were very old (older than “baby boomers”) or very sick to begin with, they might not panic. They would ask politically incorrect questions such as “Why did we close schools” or “Why did they close shuls” or “Why did they close down businesses” or “Why did they deprive some many people of their parnassah”. So not exaggerating the impact of Covid10 would cause people to question their betters, and what sort of society would you have if the commoners didn’t know their place? Where would people like Cuomo be without media that twist the facts to make them more sensational? It is no accident that the highest awards in journalism, the Pulitzers, are named for someone reknown for “yellow journalism”.

    in reply to: Trump vs Biden -who is actually ahead? #1911715
    akuperma
    Participant

    The reliability of polls broke down over the last few years due to: 1) lack of standard ways of contacting people being polled since in stead of everyone having a landline phone, people have diverse ways of being contacted; 2) mass media become highly politicized, since people being being polled tend to give the “right” answer to the pollster regardless of who they plan to vote for, and the mass media are overwhelming “blue” (Fox and the WSJ tend towards purple, nothing tends solid red until you get to specialized sources such as Breibart).

    Given the historic trend of presidents who manage to crash the economy being defeated for reelection (“it’s the economy stupid”), Trump probably is in big trouble. Regardless of what media say, people ask themselves if they are better off than four years ago, and for most people the answer is “no”, and especially among the working class voters who are the core of Trump’s base.

    in reply to: Some things are simply unique #1911289
    akuperma
    Participant

    Was the holocaust truely unique, or do we say so to avoid the unfortunate truth that is really wasn’t. While the numbers were higher, the percentage of European Jews who died was similar to other events in out history (though the geographic range greater, a function of improved transportation). Similar acts of genocide have been quite common as well (consider the Middle Passage, the Irish hunger, and the genocide of the indigenous inhabitants of the Americas). While we like to say this time it was different because it was seen as a crime, had the Germans won the war it is unlikely (but not impossible) anyone wold have objected to the holocaust for many centuries. The period of rights and prosperity we have enjoyed in America the last 75 years is what it unique.

    And looking at the rhetoric from the American left, we have reason to worry that matters will soon revert to the past, unpleasant, norm.

    in reply to: Studies Showing Masks Prevent Virus Transmission #1911161
    akuperma
    Participant

    If it prevented the disease, than no one wearing a mask would ever get Covid19. The statistics say only that wearing a mask reduces the chance of getting sick from Covid19, from perhaps one chance in fifty (the chance of an infected person becoming ill) down to something less. Other statistics show that most infected people were wearing masks.

    in reply to: Passport renewal #1910890
    akuperma
    Participant

    To Nachshon1: Switzerland (if you were a citizen).

    But today, America is the leading country for respecting the rights of religious Jews. If America goes, it’s over.
    Check back in December.

    in reply to: Studies Showing Masks Prevent Virus Transmission #1910687
    akuperma
    Participant

    The data discussed shows that masks reduce the change of becoming infected with Covid19, though as with any such virus, it probably won’t prevent you from becoming infected if you are exposed to it. Only a vaccine would do that, Fortunately, for most people, becoming infected with Covid19 rarely makes you sick. If you feel that avoid Covid19 is a life or death matter (e.g. an 85 year old with a dysfunctional immune system and lung diseases), rather than relying a mask lowering the probability of becoming infected, you should isolate yourself in sealed environment which would probably prevent catching the virus.

    An analogy would be walking out into a battlefield with or without a kevlar vest. The bulletproof vest will certainly reduce your chance of being killed, but it won’t prevent it (e.g. many soldiers in spite of wearing them). To avoid being shot, it is best to avoid going to a battlefield.

    in reply to: Withholding funding: Checkmate #1910478
    akuperma
    Participant

    The liability with accepting government handouts and patronage, is the government does not give out money our of love, it is because it wants something. You ask them for money and forgot to ask what they will want in return. Perhaps one needs to review Pirke Avos, which discussed this very problem.

    in reply to: Passport renewal #1910476
    akuperma
    Participant

    You can move out of New York City without a passport. No Passport is required to move to any of the other 49 states or the District of Columbia, or to various possessions of the United States.

    Perhaps you are like the stereotypical New Yorker who believes that the civilized world ends when you cross the Hudson? And if the United States becomes hostile to Jews, where would you move other than Eretz Yisrael (if the USA goes nazi, the rest of the world will follow) , which has never required a passport from Jewish refugees.

    So unless you plan to go touristing abroad, you can postpone renewing your passport .

    in reply to: Eruvin and masks #1910408
    akuperma
    Participant

    1, If it is common for people to wear masks, one is certainly allowed to wear a mask when there is no eruv (it is considered a garment, not something you are carrying).

    2. If the goyim are uncomfortable see Jews who aren’t wearing a funky hat or a yellow star (and assuming going out in public doesn’t raise the danger of coming to harm from the goyim), are you allowed/required to do so. Does it apply if the government basis this requirement that Jews wear special clothing as health reasons, based on their own junk science (as was the case in Germany in the mid-20th century, where their science of eugenics held that it was necessary to treat Jews as a special threat to society – and note, that science was also the basis of anti-Jewish, anti-Catholic and especially anti-Black laws in the USA).

    in reply to: Dvar Torah Bereishis — Not Without Its Limits. #1909845
    akuperma
    Participant

    Your English is using an absolute past tense, which doesn’t exist in Hebrew. Hebrew only has two tenses (the “present” is a gerund pretending to be a present tense). With two tenses, the past continues to the present (e.g. Ha-Shem created the world, and is still creating it), and the future begins now (e.g. Meshiach will come, and he is already coming). The Aryan-speakers probably consider the limited tenses in Hebrew (and other Semitic languages) to be a flaw, but it is a feature and indicates views of what is time that can’t be expressed in Aryan languages.

    akuperma
    Participant

    If the American people wanted someone physically and mentally fit for office, they would not have nominated Trump or Biden. The decision on fitness is made by the voters (the USA being a democracy), and the votes have spoken. If you don’t like their choices, the Libertarians and Greens are running candidates as well.

    in reply to: Do I have to shave my beard? #1909828
    akuperma
    Participant

    “They don’t, they are doctors and I am not it seems to be a matter of class.”

    If they have a rule on religious accommodation applicable based on “class”, you will find attorneys offering to represent you for a contingency fee (instead of getting paid, they get a piece of the profits – something they only do if they are sure you will win). You might also induce a heart attack when the employer’s attorney hears about this (a phrase heard often among lawyers: “clients do the dumbest things”).

    Make sure the supervisor is aware that this is a request for religious accommodation under the civil rights laws. That will force the supervisor to refer the question to the lawyer. It is also possible the supervisor is unaware of the religious aspect of the beard (many people, especially non-hareidi Jews, are ignorant on this subject).

    in reply to: Do I have to shave my beard? #1909758
    akuperma
    Participant

    Of their rule is that Sikhs can have beards, but Jews can’t, this is clear discrimination and you should complain to the appropriate agencies. Does the supervisor who ordered you to shave know: 1) that others in the same institution are allowed to have beards; 2) that the beard is halacha-based (n.b.: if the supervisor is a non-hareidi Jew, they might have very strong religious views of their own against beards, which, under American law, is totally irrelevant).

    in reply to: Lack of respect for Rabbonim shlita #1909535
    akuperma
    Participant

    Where Rabbonim, voluntary or in response to state-sponsored coercion, posken on wearing a mask in shul, we should follow out of respect for our government. They sincerely believe wearing a mask is a health measure, and even if wrong, they should be respected.

    When we go on the goyim’s streets, given that their rule is that only members of politically incorrect minorities must wear masks and refrain from gathering together, we are under no obligation to follow them. The only reason to obey an anti-semitic tyrant is fear that the tyrant will try to kill you, and if we actually believe that Cuomo and DeBlasio are ready to engage in ethnic cleansing against us we should be moving elsewhere with all deliberate speed.

    in reply to: Should People Test More, or Less? #1909286
    akuperma
    Participant

    mdd1: People have been dying in vastly greater numbers for millenia (as we reckon time). And they die of a great many things, many of which could be avoided (e.g. if we banned cars, tens of thousands of lives would be saved). Closing down the economy and stripping millions of people of their parnassah and property was not an appropriate response to what is basically a cold (a.k.a. coronavirus) that acts like flu.

    Also note the Republicans (or at least Trump) tried to close the border to Chinese travellers but the Democrats screamed loudly and said it was racist. Indeed, Trump is distinguished, much to the objections of the Republican business community, by his opposition to open borders.

    in reply to: Should People Test More, or Less? #1909186
    akuperma
    Participant

    The government is unlikely to support widespread testing since it would reveal a large number of people who have, or had, Covid19, but didn’t get sick. This would undermine the narrative that Covid19 is a very dangerous plague that justifies canceling the education of children, destroying small businesses and closing synagogues (and all religious institutions). When the emperor has no clothes, the last thing he wants is accurate data.

    in reply to: Yiddishe Meshugas #1908872
    akuperma
    Participant

    Many Americans are outraged by the ridiculous suppression of human rights under the pretext of public health. It is hardly limited to frum Jews. When you look at the figures of all infected (as reflected in antibody tests), one realizes that Covid 19 is a disease that rarely makes people sick, and in the rare cases where someone gets sick it is usually fatal only to those who were seriously ill to begin with.

    What it does mean is the the frum community has finally realized that it is dumb to regard New York as a good place to live. We should avoid a state where persecution of religion is considered good public policy. If we wish to stay in America, it is time to start moving to the conservative states.

    in reply to: Empirical data on 2nd wave #1908837
    akuperma
    Participant

    Data needs context. Measure the “normal” death rate. If instead of 2.8 million deaths, there are 3 millions deaths, that does NOT suggest a disaster that warrants the social and economic disruption. If instead of 2.8 million deaths, there are 28 million (what one expect from Smallpox or Plague, and probably ten times that), there is a need to panic.

    in reply to: Cuomo #1908464
    akuperma
    Participant

    Why? Because he is a politically correct Democrat, and the continued existence of frum Jews (along with most religions) is a serious offense against political correctness.

    in reply to: Americans at fault? #1908465
    akuperma
    Participant

    Outside of New York City, there isn’t a serious problem. The response of most Western European Jews to the Crusades was to move to adjacent Christian territories where they people were nicer. The response of most European Jews to the holocaust was to move to other countries where the people were friendlier. If you can’t stand the New York Democrats, move. Note that under American law, no visa is needed to move to another state.

    in reply to: Covid #1908461
    akuperma
    Participant

    You can be for masks (they do reduce the chance of catching the normal coronavirus, a.k.a. “cold”, even if they don’t reduce our change of dying or getting seriously ill) without believing that Covid19 is a serious threat to health (unless you are older than a boomer, or seriously ill to begin with).

    Masks do go very well with neckties (both are decorative, allow expression, and serve no real function).

    in reply to: Where are the women? #1908198
    akuperma
    Participant

    The government statistics are internally incoherent since they base them on people tested (a non-random population) rather than people infected (as revealed by random testing including antibody testing). The government lied from the beginning claiming that most persons infected by Covid would be become seriously ill and several percent would die, whereas in facts over 90% of those infected don’t get sick, and the death rate of those infected is in tenths of a percent and in fact represents only a tiny “blip” compared to the overall death rate (in part since Covid19 kills mostly old people or those already quite ill). In real epidemics, such as smallpox in a new population, death rates would be in the tens of percents, everyone would get sick, and children would be the most vulnerable – a “plague” that doesn’t cause illness for most people and kills only the elderly is not a social threat. The shutdowns and closures were and are a mistake, and we are right to suspect ulterior motives.

    The government in “blue” states do not believe their own propaganda since they routinely allow their supporters to gather without masks or social distancing (note: these are the people they would least want to die), while at the same time striking a blow against religions whom they have for a long time regarded as mortal enemies. It should also be noted that the frum community is much less likely than the general population to be affected since we are radically younger, not to mention that the age group most at risk from Covid19 are those who are older than “boomers” (i.e. those born after World War II, which in our community is an age group that is still artificially reduced due to high mortality among Jewish children during the period preceding 1945). Some frum media have unwisely “bought” the false narrative put out by the hyper-secular liberal media.

    And why do you see relatively few frum women protesting? In our community, large, noisy and potentially violent protests are not seen as a place for women. If you don’t realize that, you really don’t understand the sociology of the frum community.

    in reply to: Joe Biden Criminal? #1908142
    akuperma
    Participant

    But if we threw all the crooked politicians in jail, they would never have a quorum. And since most honest people refuse to have anything to do with government, we would have anarchy.

    in reply to: RECALL CUOMO NOW! #1907857
    akuperma
    Participant

    The best answer is to move. If B&H or the diamond district were to get up and move all their operations (other than storefronts) to a low tax, red state – it would speak more loudly than all the screeching heard here.

    in reply to: NYC lockdowns again #1907466
    akuperma
    Participant

    Maybe the frum businesses aren’t supposed to survive?

    in reply to: Testing the Trap #1907461
    akuperma
    Participant

    The Zionists are no better than the American secularists.

    Civil disobedience might be an option. Americans have a long history of supporting peaceful resistance to government. It is for Daas Torah to decide whether to fight, and how.

    Few living can remember when to be a Yid meant to live with limited rights, and under constant persecution and discrimination. This is actually normal and we should get used to it, and remember as our ancestors have for centuries, that this is only the fake world, and our attention must remain focused on the real world.

    in reply to: Which 5 countries will make peace with Israel #1904698
    akuperma
    Participant

    It doesn’t make any difference unless it is: Iran, Syria, Gaza (i.e. Hamas), West Bank (i.e. PLO) or the remnants of Al Queda and ISIS.

    Having a peace treaty with a country with which you aren’t engaged in an active war is meaningless.

    Peace means you can abolish conscription, cut taxes and demilitarize your political and economic systems.

    Also, a peace treaty with an unpopular dictator is worthless since it only binds the dictator, not the country.

    in reply to: Why are massive protests okay, but davening in a minyan is not? #1904670
    akuperma
    Participant

    It depends on the local government. If you have a pro-Trump rally in New York, you can be certain the government will object. That the government lets its supporters rally, and cracks down on its opponents (and socialists believe that trying to crush religion is a policy to be supported), suggests that those in charge do not perceive there to be a serious public health threat from Covid19 (if they did, they would be very protective of their supporters, and demand that their enemies, which includes frum Yidden, get together mask free).

    in reply to: Covid in Frum Communities #1904593
    akuperma
    Participant

    Whether it is a Hillul ha-Shem or a Kiddush ha-Shem is a political question. If you are “blue” you probably believe that the measures to stop Covid19 are matters of pikuach nefesh, and the government is acting reasonably to fulfill their duties under the public health laws. If you are “red” you probably feel that Covid19 is not a serious public health threat, except for people who due to age or infirmity should probably not be going out in public to begin with, and the the actions of people such as the New York City mayor are the acts of a bigoted tyrant using the pretext of public health to crack down on he considers to be his enemies. If you are “red”, then davening in shul without a mask is a courageous act of civil disobedience against an unjust government, and as such is a kiddush-ha-Shem (though like many acts of civil disobedience, perhaps a bit foolhardy).

    In a city such as Baltimore, where the local Vaad ha-Rabbanim is issuing restrictions going far beyond those of the government (and observed by most but not all shuls), it could be argued that following regulations issued by the local Vaad (which is “our” government) is mandated by halacha even if those issuing the regulations are misguided and poorly advised in their secular knowledge (though no one would accuse them of having an ulterior motive).

    One should note that in many circles, proper dress includes useless items such as a necktie, so it seems can go along with adding a useless mask, especially if it matches the useless necktie. One should note that while the utility of a mask to prevent Covid19 is debateable, there are reports from the southern hemisphere (whose winters occur during our summers) that mask wearing reduces flu and colds, and there is a possibility that masks will become part of standard fashion.

    in reply to: NON CORONA TOPIC: Why would anyone voted Biden #1904424
    akuperma
    Participant

    If you have a large family, and receive many entitlements (food stamps, medicare or medicaid or a CHIP program, housing assistance), unless you run a business, you are probably better off economically under the Democrats. If you aren’t a fanatic zionist, Biden is no worse than any other Democrats in terms of aiding Israel (though he won’t support “transfer”). While Biden supports or tolerates many very morally dubious policies, most Yidden have historically assumed the goyim are amoral and don’t see that as very shocking. More frum Jews (unlike our non-observant cousins) are fairly poor and benefit from the Democrats largesse (and taxing and spending are what Democrats do best).

    in reply to: Abortions for Goyim #1903817
    akuperma
    Participant

    Its covered by the Shevah mitsvos of the Bnei Noach (Seven mitsvos applicable to non-Jews).
    The fact that abortion and infanticide have a long history of acceptability among goyim is irrelevant.

    in reply to: The End of the Medina #1903016
    akuperma
    Participant

    The medinah as a Jewish state never existed. Indeed, the “dream” of a Jewish state has been a nightmare for most zionists since the beginning. The “crackdown” on shuls and yesvhivos is based on blatantly false public health claims, suggesting a rather obvious ulterior motive.

    Note the zionists claim 1000 Israelis out of 8 million have died, but by their death rate statistics .5 percent (one in 200, or 40000) die annually so the 1000 “covid deaths” (many of whom would have died anyways) is a tiny drop in the bucket – hardly the basis for measures more appropriate for something such as a renewed smallpox or bubonic plague epidemic.

    in reply to: Our Community Is Powerless: Here’s Why #1902693
    akuperma
    Participant

    These are difficult times???? You probably missed out on history class in school (too busy learning – has ve’shalom I would suggest you weren’t paying attention).

    The country panics over a virus that is little more than the annual flu, but compared to real influenza (e.g. 1918 version) or something like smallpox, is little worse than a cold. I much prefer Covid19 (which really isn’t a threat) to something like smallpox or bubonic plague.

    So the government is a stickel anti-religious in a few big states. So move to a different state. There are plenty of “red” states. And if you think anti-semitism is a problem today, read about the last century (and the one before that, etc.) to see what anti-semitism really is.

    Even with bigoted fools running the government, there is no need to get bent out of shape.

    in reply to: Smoking and Driking in Yeshivas! #1901412
    akuperma
    Participant

    When I was that age, I found it annoying (I never smoked, and almost never drink except on Shabbos).

    When I was a tatti, I found it outrageous that yeshivos put up with such things.

    Now that I’m a Zeidy, I realize that kids will be kids, and that’s been true since the beginning. And they tend to outgrow it, and at least I had less trouble than Adam he-Rishon, whose kids really got into mischief.

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 3,412 total)