Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Charlie hall I’m impressed that you know of atonal music .Much less impressed that you actually like it. Lol
I know he “reconverted” but was schonberg orthodox ?avreichamshlomo After reading through many of your posts in the coffee room I would simply say מום שבך אל תאמר לחברך . In fact if you were truly so holy and did not waste any of your own time you would not be browsing the coffee room .
Besides this topic does touch on hashkafadig issues, yet out of all the inane conversations on ywn coffee room you chose this one to get all self righteously angry about ? REALLY?Yabia OK But if your argument was based on assuming that those who believe Yiddish is holy don’t believe that Judaeo Arabic or Ladino is holy and that this is an inconsistent position. Then you may have “built a house of cards” .Because they probably would consider those holy as well.
Yabia Well you asked if “Arabic” is holy .Not the Jewish dialects of Arabic .
Yabia omer. The reasoning for those who say Yiddish is holy is because it has been “Judaized” i.e. it is a purely Jewish vernacular. Arabic on the other hand ,Semitic origin notwithstanding is a bonafide gentile tongue .
It is not the same.If the sages speaking a language makes it holy than you need to consider others as well.Old french was spoken by Rashi and Tosafot does that make french holy? Also it was not Arabic per se but rather Judeo-Arabic that was spoken by the Jews of the Middle East and North Africa. Which like Yiddish included many Hebrew Aramaic terms.
As for Arabic being related to “Semitic Hebrew” So are many other languages. Would you say that
Tigrinya a Semitic language spoken by people of Eritrea is holy?After looking at the earlier posts on this thread I find the wild way anonymous writes to be bizarre. I mean look at this quote “But from the way you write, I assume your talis katon is something like a size 18 which is less than an amah even according to the minimum shiur.” So here we have this big anonymous tzadik just randomly accuseing some random guy he does not even know .And he was wrong because the other person says he actually goes with a size 24 .
I mean wow somebody needs to calm downAnonymous why do so many anti techieles people like yourself ignore so many things which are so much more important to be against .Like not taking during davening first zman krias shema lashon hara etc.Where are your posts on those issues? there are so much more important things to be against than techeiles.
Anonymous it’s obvious the reason you are so shrilly arguing over here is because you feel threatened .Because you actually are very worried that it is only a matter of time before more and more people start wearing it. haha
But why should that bother you so much?
Do you have a problem with people following rabbi Belski or yblc rav Karp or other rabbanim?
Who do you think you are ?Anonymous please stop putting words into peoples mouth ,fake maven never said “It’s very well known Rav Elyashiv spent his time on Shas and Poskim” that was user dayanu. since you hold its a terrible thing to say you were nebach choshid bkisheirim again. You are clearly so agitated that you are forgetting who is who. So calm down and relaaaaxx
anonymous OY VEY .your comment attacking fake maven is a botched up job .You said “FakeMaven is bordering on kefira. To say that if any Rishon holds there is no techeiles nowadays should “wrap it up”, is heresy”.But the funny part is fake maven WAS QUOTING the commentator DAAS torah who said” There are those who argue, but any one rishon that says nignaz is a halacha shoiuldnt wrap up the whole mitzva, becouse there is a broader world out there.” To that fake maven replied ” Please name me one Rishon that clearly says nignaz means literally.” in other words he was arguing.. SO it seems you where nebach choshed biksherim .!!! Now as the tzaddik you clearly claim to be who knows everyone’s level of yiras shamayim should you not apologize and as the gemara says chosed bkesheirim tzarich levarcho??
but besides that explain why it’s a problem to say that when there is a machlokes rishonim one rishon is often not enough for the poskim to decide the halacha .The author of mesilas yeharim the ramchal ,also states in his sefer Derech Hashem that the number of people who ” are actually annihilated will be small not great”. Perhaps the meaning of that Rashi is referring to the truly righteous tzadik gamur who will not need to be even purified first ?