adamemes1

Usually when someone does something with criminal intent they try to cover it up. I think its astonishing how much forensic evidence supports the story exactly as Zimmerman has reported it.

There are many people who are saying Zimmerman should not have followed Trayvon and if he did not the shooting would have never happened. I believe this argument is completely false.

There were two stages of Zimmerman’s interactions with Trayvon. One was at the clubhouse. It appears on the non emergency call to authorities that Zimmerman was afraid of the suspect. In a hushed tone he told the operator that it appears that Trayvon is “checking me out”. The operator tells Zimmerman can you tell me where he is now? Zimmerman then relates that he lost him because he started running. Zimmerman then gets out of the clubhouse parking spot with his vehicle and goes in the direction that Trayvon went. To this point no tells Zimmerman not to follow.

The next stage starts when we hear Zimmerman again tell the operator that he lost him and try unsuccessfully to pinpoint his location. He tells the operator that he will try to find Trayvon. The operator suggests that he does not have to. Zimmerman says okay. Around this time Zimmerman mutters “F— punks always get away”.

Now comes the conflicting stories. The Prosecution wants to claim that his cursing shows ill will and a intent to kill when he went supposedly went after Trayvon.

The problem is we have zero evidence at this point that Zimmerman tried to follow Trayvon. Zimmerman in his reenactment clearly says he went across the T to find a lit area so he can see a house address so the police know where to meet him. It’s also hard to believe that a guy who had earlier been intimidated by Trayvon checking him out all of a sudden decided that he is unafraid to follow him. It is far more plausible that Zimmerman believed that Trayvon ran away and wasn’t coming back. Since he himself had told the dispatcher “F— punks always get away”. Since he felt that Trayvon already had left the area he felt comfortable walking around to look for a house address. It also makes sense why he got so startled when Trayvon confronted him because he believed that Trayvon had already left.

Any other theory is unsupported and purely speculation.

I could care less about the subject of Woman writers but I saw the name George Eliot it reminded me of a story. Here’s how it goes.

My uncle runs an organization for sick children so he travels around a lot. One time he passed by Far Rockaway and stopped into R’ Freifeld’s yeshiva to daven Mincha. Before he left he noticed some CDs for sale. The CDs were different lectures given by R’ Freifeld so picked one up to have something to listen to on the way home. My Uncle relates that the lecture was not too interesting for him since it was given to college students.

A few days later he entered a Hospital to visit one of his patients. The Patient told my Uncle that there is another Jewish patient in a different room and suggested my uncle go talk to her. My Uncle reluctantly went since my Uncle usually only goes to people who call him for his assistance. On the way to the other patient my Uncle frantically tried to think of something positive to say when he sees the patient but to no avail. Upon entering the patient’s room still apprehensive not knowing what to say he noticed the girl was reading a book by George Eliot. He instantly had a flashback to the Shiur from R’ Freifeld. In the Shiur R’ Freifeld asked the students if they knew that the writer George Eliot was a women and most students were surprised by that and were even more surprised that R’ Freifeld knew. My uncle seeing that the patient was reading a book by George Eliot introduced himself and asked the patient “Did you know that George Eliot was a woman”? My uncle dresses in Chassidishe Garb so you can imagine it was an eye opener for the patient and it lead to a pleasant conversation. Now my uncle knew why he picked up that CD by R’ Freifeld.