Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
About TimeParticipant
zahavasdad,
It’s a difficult quandary.
But standing up for your basic precepts ought to mean more than money
Yes?
June 30, 2015 10:47 pm at 10:47 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089814About TimeParticipantThese threads seems more like attempts to push off a dirge or an obituary for USA
In a few days will be July 4. Many still will go through motions of celebration. [ pumped up now more than ever,red, white and blue, by the media and all who, a half a generation ago,used to disdain the patriotic celebrations- but we digress]
But for tens of millions of goyim, in their heavy hearts they feel that the sun is setting
America was once ” the last,best hope on earth”
Wistfully,it had a nice run
Nevermore
Lest you claim as you will,this is a bit exaggerating
here’s a Dare:
Walk into a foreign embassy, serve them a couple of drinks to loosen them
Then just ask them
In a few days will be July 4. Of course, many will go the motions of celebrations. [ pumped up by the media and all who a half a generation used to disdain the patriotic celebrations- but we digress]
June 30, 2015 8:10 pm at 8:10 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089811About TimeParticipantAll the rationalizations are just more elaborate means of disguising a formal chap. 11 for our mission that we were given by our Maker some many centuries ago.
He who created you, Knows
.
Lord Jakubowitz once stated there were four philosophy based revolutions in
in the past several centuries
1.The British Puritan Civil War
2.The american
3. The french
4.The russian
The first two were based on the bible ,and though there was bloodshed,brought greater human dignity and progress to mankind.
The latter two were based on secularism and and brought destruction and regress
June 30, 2015 8:00 pm at 8:00 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089810About TimeParticipantMorality is at the pinnacle of the Legal system, and referred to in criminal Law, left ,right and center.
Often perversely by the same crowd.
End-of-life is persuasively turned into: it’s immoral to let someone suffer or doctors ( or anyone)should be entitled to end a life.
Paradoxically, capital punishment ought to be prohibited because:it’s immoral for us to end any life, even a serial murderer
Abortion and even for some post-birth:what makes this fetus or infant a human?
Paradoxically robots or chimpanzees, however, should be given some human rights
“Legal systems are not merely systems of rules but also systems of principles..In order to arrive at adequate legislation it is necessary to stratify these principles and rank them by employing moral judgement.”
June 30, 2015 6:01 pm at 6:01 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089794About TimeParticipantsimcha613,
Then the Supreme Court should stay out of it
Second,Law
in it’s essence all morality.
The Left, who are alot smarter than you,says it all the time
How else could the the government sin tax alchohol ,tobbaco, firearms,illegalize drugs,force you to wear a seatbelt in your car,etc.etc.
But we digress..
June 30, 2015 5:56 pm at 5:56 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089793About TimeParticipant“A nation, as a society, forms a moral person, and every member of it is personally responsible for his society.”
Thomas Jefferson
June 30, 2015 5:55 pm at 5:55 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089792About TimeParticipantGoyim are inherently natural .In their insides ,they sense when when something is unnatural and wrong(although often get swept along with the need to be PC)
It is invariably those of jewish extraction who invent rationalizations.
Biden thanked the jews for causing this toppling of mores less than two years ago
zahavasdad,
civil unions were all the same rights .
But these shrewd animals insisted on pushing for the word marriage,
No wonder ,the chofetz chaim said these jews [and their supportes are scions of amalek.
June 30, 2015 5:31 pm at 5:31 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089787About TimeParticipantGreat men are they who see that spiritual is stronger than any material force – that thoughts rule
Ralph Waldo Emerson
There a drift in values , things that would be unthinkable become the norm. In a recent article in Canadian Medical Association Journal, Tom Koch discussed the Polio epidemic in the 1950s. He noted how everyone scrambled to save every life. Gymnasiums were turned into wards and cots were lined up from wall to wall. Steel lung machines were made and people were kept alive in these big negative pressure boxes. It was an imperative to save as many lives as possible. Nobody considered the costs or the quality of life of the people that were saved. He laments that in todays society the polio victims would be counseled against seeking treatment and most would die.
June 30, 2015 5:27 pm at 5:27 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089786About TimeParticipant25 June 2014:UK Right to die appeal rejected
Lord Neuberger announces Court’s decision
Judges ruled – by a majority of seven to two – against the appeal by Paul Lamb and Jane Nicklinson over the right to die.
A majority of the justices said that the question they were being asked involved moral judgements rather than points of law – and the matter had to be addressed by a democratically-elected Parliament.
June 30, 2015 5:02 pm at 5:02 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089785About TimeParticipantEven this secular rationalization is inherently weak
The Declaration Of Indepedence was a document in that it appealed to Heaven for the right to rebel under the moral principles of the Creator
Otherwise
1.what gives them the right to rebel ,but you lack such a right?
2. what gave them the right to force the southern states to stay?
They referred constantly to the moral law based on the bible for their raison d’etre
Since it is all now about power, let cut through the pretenses and
abolish so called Law
June 30, 2015 4:51 pm at 4:51 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089783About TimeParticipantThe most obvious reason is ,IT is about being human, Basic biology!
[How come when you walk into a hardware store and ask for a male or female part ,they will give it to you ?!?]
You also should read the written dissents of Justices Roberts ,Scalia ,Thomas and Alito
In Brief:
“A nation, as a society, forms a moral person, and every member of it is personally responsible for his society.”
“We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.”
June 30, 2015 4:35 pm at 4:35 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089781About TimeParticipantThird,If consensual is supposedly the end all and be all
How come polygamy is illegal?
Somehow suddenly we “care about the greater society” whatever that means?!
The real answer is because ,whatever they might propagandize, the it will undermine them and their real evil goals by restoring a patriachal society
June 30, 2015 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089780About TimeParticipantThree Answers:
The word ‘marriage’ is semantics they already had all the benefits and ‘rights’
It was used for exclusively for traditional relationship for eons.
What did they need to have that word for?
If they so despise that word let them push to completely abolish the concept of marriage altogether for all!
It presupposes a sinister nefarious agenda that they spent billions of $ ,focused careers took over the western world all in order to ‘hijack’ and subvert a word!
Second,All societies from the beginning of human existence had a varied of personal styles
The Greeks, for example, were quite deviant. Many of them disliked marriage and disliked women.
YET, all of them ,every single society from the aztecs to the kalahari bushmen. From the Siberian tartars to polynesians
In every era every century , every clime -GREEKS Included-Have remarkably always understood till now that marraige could only mean between opposite genders
About TimeParticipantyayin yashan bkli chadash,
“In eretz yisrael, if you work you are considered a goy”
Things are rapidly a-changing
‘
“?? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ??????. ???. ????? ?????? ???? ??? ????????? ???? ???????? ???? ????????. ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????. ?????. ?? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ????. ?? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ??????. ?? ??????? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ??????, ?? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?? ?? ????????”
??? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????.
“??? ???? ?? ?????. ?? ????? ????. ??? ??????? ?? ???? ?????. ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????????, ??? ?? ?????? ?????. ????? ???? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?????, ??? ???? ????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?????.
“??? ???? ???? ????? ?????: ????? ?? ???, ?? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? ??????,???? ????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ??? ??????. ?? ?????? ????. ??? ????? ?????? ?????. ??? ???? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?????. ????-????, ????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????, ???????, ????? ?????”
Part of the present schism between Degel and Eitz ,is that Degel has been bringing ‘working charedim’/Charda”k into their rank and file.
This has prompted the reaction .Interestingly,a disproportionate percentage of Eitz supporters are anglos and americans and anglos
About TimeParticipantLior ,
There was intent to open
on Ave.S and Ocean Pkwy
About TimeParticipantR’ Shmuel Berenbaum, had certain ideas about yeshivas and what a ben torah should be immersed in. R’ Shmuel said in a shmooze it’s bitul torah for a ben torah in yeshiva to be reading a newspaper “even one such as the yated”. R’ Moshe Tuvia Leiff, heard from R’ Shmuel, that if there would have been daf yomi in the days of the Yevanim, they would not have included it in the decree.
R’ Shmuel, further ,had a certain view of what should be learnt in a yeshiva. Some 35 years ago, a small group of talmidim and alumni formed a chaburah to learn the Rambam’s moreh nevuchim at night in the yeshiva’s ezras nashim. When R’ Shmuel found out about this, he told them they cannot do this in yeshiva and must learn this elsewhere. More recently, some 15 years ago, a fellow arrived in yeshiva and started a navi chaburah during night seder. Again when it came to R’ Shmuel’s attention, he briefly told him that it was not acceptable.
About TimeParticipantWhen Touro College wanted to open a branch near Mir Yeshiva, Reb Shmuel Berenbaum went down to Reb Moshe Feinstein z”l to try to prevent it from happening. Reb Moshe strongly concurred with Reb Shmuel that it was improper in the extreme to open up a college a block away from a Yeshiva Gedolah, and tried to do whatever he could to prevent it .
About TimeParticipantRema711,
correct
The Kitzur ( chap.3) spells out the reason for wearing black.
White is more kabbalistic.
February 1, 2015 6:50 pm at 6:50 pm in reply to: You know you're not a yeshiva guy anymore when… #1197582About TimeParticipantyayin yashan bkli chadash,
go alittle easier on yourself
“?? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ??????. ???. ????? ?????? ???? ??? ????????? ???? ???????? ???? ????????. ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????. ?????. ?? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ????. ?? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? . ?? ??????? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ??????, ?? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?? ?? ????????”
??? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????.
“??? ???? ?? ?????. ?? ????? ????. ??? ??????? ?? ???? ?????. ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????????, ??? ?? ?????? ?????. ????? ???? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?????, ??? ???? ????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?????.
“??? ???? ???? ????? ?????: ????? ?? ???, ?? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? ??????,???? ????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ??? ??????. ?? ?????? ????. ??? ????? ?????? ?????. ??? ???? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?????. ????-????, ????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????, ???????, ????? ?????”.
About TimeParticipantRema711, while you’re at it if you would increase your background knowledge ,you may just possibly glean that everything stated by myself is impeccable.
p.s Are these just your ( and MDGs)attempts to avoid the main topic/s of the thread?
About TimeParticipantRema711
“About Time Only Yeshiva, That’s how we as jews have withstood the test of time”
“About Time is just about to burst his bubble!!!”
“About Time I think it is time for u to quit the argument with MDG, cause u know who will win “
“About Time just admit MDG is right”
Rema711,
Thank you for your wonderful contributions
Would you like to add something ?
About TimeParticipantR’ Shmuel Berenbaum had certain ideas about yeshivas and what a ben torah should be immersed in. R’ Shmuel said in a shmooze it’s bitul torah for a ben torah in yeshiva to be reading a newspaper “even one such as the yated”. R’ Moshe Tuvia Leiff, heard from R’ Shmuel, that if there would have been daf yomi in the days of the Yevanim, they would not have included it in the decree.
R’ Shmuel, further,had a certain view of what should be learnt in a yeshiva. Some 35 years ago, a small group of talmidim and alumni formed a chaburah to learn the Rambam’s moreh nevuchim at night in the yeshiva’s ezras nashim. When R’ Shmuel found out about this, he told them they cannot do this in yeshiva and must learn this elsewhere. More recently, some 15 years ago, a fellow arrived in yeshiva and started a navi chaburah during night seder. Again when it came to R’ Shmuel’s attention, he briefly told him that it was not acceptable.
About TimeParticipantIn the late 90’s the leaders of Pirchei tried to persuade R’ Shmuel Berenbaum to encourage bochurim to become pirchei leaders. All they could elicit out of R’ Shmuel was to get a mention in the weekly Friday Chumash shmooze. When the time came, all R’ Shmuel would say was that he didn’t see the point of a bochur taking off from his time to do pirchei. If the bochur were to learn mishnayos with the boys, good, but just to say stories and discuss the parsha a little, he didn’t feel was a worthwhile endeavour. Yet R’ Shmuel was aware that over the years many of his talmidim were involved in pirchei , and he never discouraged them
February 1, 2015 4:09 pm at 4:09 pm in reply to: You know you're not a yeshiva guy anymore when… #1197579About TimeParticipantR’ Moshe Tuvia Leiff heard from R’ Shmuel Berenbaum, that if there would have been daf yomi in the days of the Yevanim, they would not have included it in the decree.
About TimeParticipantReb Shmuel Berenbaum
About TimeParticipantA more pressing query :Do the up and coming generation of Talmidei Chachomim appreciate the sacrifices the klal are making on their behalf & are they preparing to give back accordingly?
When R’ Yaakov Kamenetzky zt”l organized a knessia to encourage avreichim to go into chinuch, he chose to hold this gathering in the Mirrer Yeshiva. After R’ Yaakov finished his oration everyone waited for R’ Shmuel to speak knowing full well that R’ Shmuel encouraged his talmidim to stay in learning for countless years. What R’ Shmuel then said was powerfully intriguing. “When a person learns, he should not learn just for himself, he should learn for klal yisrael. If he is only able to stay in learning for a couple of years, he should learn with intention to give over to cheder age talmidim. If he is zoche to learn for several more years, he should keep in mind that he should be able to give over to mesivta level bochurim. And if he could learn even longer, he should prepare himself to be a rosh yeshiva. A person should always prepare to give over to the tzibbur .
About TimeParticipantSorry MDG ,presumably you’re capable of a little researching.
About TimeParticipant“Divisons”
Divisions
Oh, dear. cherrypicking,eh?
It perhaps originated with one of famous journalists :B Murrow or Ernie Pyle but it’s largely irrelevant.
It or a variation of it were a common refrain
But Come On .
Such refrains were common in aristocratic Europe
Don’t you believe Lincoln did more the Union Cause than countless Corp.?
MDG ,
“I don’t read modox journals, “
If you’re using a quote,you ought to research those who actually have been the ones to throw it out whenever/however it seemeed to serve their [self adulation and] purposes
Probably you’ll find it on any old school modox blog if you desire,
or ask one of the coffeeroom modox for an honest answer
About TimeParticipantThis post on a very nuanced topic of gravity, naturally lacks both :nuance and gravity
Firsty, IT is a Chazal “Vayikra Rabbah 2:1, “One thousand students enter to study Mikra…
Second, “Churchill was worth 100 Divisons”
Rav Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler and Rav Shimon Schwab were both aware(,as doubtfully any of the posters are,)
and approved of an attempt to fuse both sides,namely
Kovno Orthodoxie of the ’20’s and ’30s
The most notable example -since it transplanted itself-was Telz.
For some reason,it seemed to have sunk into hibernation,
possibly
because it lacked drama and/or abrasiveness of either side.
About TimeParticipantMDG
Goodness.
So the hundreds of times that was quoted in modox journals ,publications (,and more recently blogs)to buttress their lifestyle,have all been completely disingenuous ?
Can we wind back the clock a half century?
Pashuteh Yid
Even if you wish to be serious , these are exceptions that prove the rule!
About TimeParticipantThe Ramban in Sefer HaMitzvos posits that in some cases it isn’t Harog v’al ya’avor.
old man: typical ivory tower foolishness. Is he choosing to be casting aspersions on thousands of our mutual ancestors who jumped into the flames and onto swords?!
About TimeParticipanttypo
condenscension
About TimeParticipantB.The Codex form, in general,was always frowned upon by the Ashkenaz leadrship
To expound (although possibly too much has already been said:
Who wrote all the Codes (such as the Rambam and Shulchan Oruch)? They were accepted, adopted and constitutionalized by poskei Ashkenaz but with some condensention
The Vilna Gaon was beseeched upon to write a new Code,gave it some thought but then declined.
About TimeParticipantThe dayan was Rav A Sherman, who ironically was hitherto considered charda’l (and had previously spent a sabbatical at YU) but the moment he showed his sincerity and straight shooting ehrlichkeit his past was erased and he was ostracized as chareidi!
About TimeParticipantAnyone can pull an abberant psak out of a hat to prove alomost whatever they so desire.
Ironically it’s the same “crowd” which claims from the other side of their mouths, that halachah doesn’t take place in vacuum.
What were the circumstances?
This world does have a goal!
Will it bring it closer?
Every factor must be weighed
Or do you(plural) pay fealty to a modified version of ‘when there is a halachic will there is a halachic way’ ?!
p.s.Therefore it is utterly ridiculous,and rather revealing, to claim or feign that any earlier great posek would be out of the present mainstream
About TimeParticipantR o B,
Still spewing?!
Many of geirus Druckman supposedly administered,happened while he was abroad!
There is an interview on record,on which a a brand new “convert”
said right after the ceremony she had zero intent of observing judaism
About TimeParticipantHaving been on a leave of absence of several months,but discern that but little has changed
First things first
There are a few reasons how come the OH might have been relegated
A.It’s style was written for a rabbi administering a milieu
The MB,by constrast,was intended to be a “transportable homeland”
B.The Codex form, in general,was always frowned upon by the Ashkenaz leadrship
About TimeParticipantzahavasdad
“If you blame WW II on the Nazis then Hitler could be at fault for 50 Million. In other words BOTH were bad and Stalin WAS an Anti-Semite, Ever hear of the doctors Plot for example?”
Therefore ?
A little information is more often worth less than being completely devoid of any.
Btw,Stalin’s first wife and son Yakovlev(whom he disliked)were jewish.
Kaganovich was one of the few close advisors who survived every purge.
December 19, 2013 7:34 pm at 7:34 pm in reply to: Calling people with questionable smicha Rabbi #995597About TimeParticipant‘As an example, HaRav Trager cited an incident that took place in America, when Reb Chaim Kreiswirth conferred semichoh upon a certain man and subsequently discovered that the recipient had behaved unworthily. Giving some excuse, Reb Chaim immediately took the document back. The recipient took Reb Chaim to court, claiming that what had been given could not be revoked and that he could not retract the semichoh after having given it.
Reb Chaim went to court and argued that there is a distinction between a permit and a diploma. A diploma is an earned title which, once conferred, cannot be retracted. This is customary the world over.
About TimeParticipantLady Thatcher, who died in April aged 87, has come under fire for her resistance to tougher penalties on the South Africa regime during the 1980s, and faced accusations it was a selfish move to protect Britain’s business interests.
But Mr de Klerk, who along with Nelson Mandela oversaw the transition to ANC rule, said Thatcher and then US president Ronald Reagan had “helped to buy essential time for South Africa”.
“It is a pity that the Conservative Party has subsequently apologised for Thatcher’s opposition to sanctions,” he added.
Writing in the Times, Mr de Klerk argues that the handing over of power to the African National Congress (ANC) in the 1980s would have resulted in fighting and “the imposition of a communist regime” by the party’s left wing.
“Margaret Thatcher understood this,” he wrote. “Although she was a consistent critic of apartheid, she had no illusions about the challenges that we faced.
“She doggedly resisted demands for more sanctions and always gave me and our negotiating partners strong support for the achievement of a genuine non-racial constitutional democracy,” he added.
“In all likelihood an ANC victory before the mid-1980s could have been achieved only after a devastating racial war and would not have resulted in a genuine constitutional democracy but in the imposition of a communist regime.”
About TimeParticipantTo be very brief:
Dr.Verwoerd was ,indeed, an pretty bad fellow,and
his Nationalist Party did have much to dislike.
The great Smuts ,who they defeated ,was definitely more to my inclination.
Still, call a Spade a Spade.
The balance of Afrikaaners did treat the blacks with a Respect,though some dehumanized them.That was ignored by those who wished to destroy their Velt.
Like the French in Quebec,the Afrikaaners felt themselves surrounded.
The French practice linguistic Apartheid rather than racial.
Does anyone complain?
But ,Because their basis is Secularist liberal,it’s Okay.
However, since the afrikaaners’ was of conservative religious,it would have to be branded with the ‘mark of Cain’.
Many jews as is their bent,populated the Marxist (Joe Slovo)and leftish Progressive(H.Suzman) Movements,which exacerbated the relations
Also, remember,they were the bulwark against the spread of communism and other evils for the whole of southern africa.
The Sharpsville and other incidents,alluded to,were tragic,cruel and unacceptable
but needs to be put in context.
About TimeParticipant“Churchill allied with Stalin”
Try again.
He allied himself with the victims of nazi aggression
This was his speech:
All this was no surprise to me. In fact I gave clear and precise warnings to Stalin of what was coming. I gave him warnings, as I have given warnings to others before. I can only hope that these warnings did not fall unheeded.
All we know at present is that the Russian people are defending their native soil and that their leaders have called upon them to resist to the utmost.
Hitler is a monster of wickedness, insatiable in his lust for blood and plunder. Not content with having all Europe under his heel or else terrorized into various forms of abject submission, he must now carry his work of butchery and desolation among the vast multitudes of Russia and of Asia. The terrible military machine which we and the rest of the civilized world so foolishly, so supinely, so insensately allowed the Nazi gangsters to build up year by year from almost nothing-this machine cannot stand idle, lest it rust or fall to pieces. It must be in continual motion, grinding up human lives and trampling down the homes and the rights of hundreds of millions of men.
Moreover, it must be fed not only with flesh but with oil. So now this bloodthirsty guttersnipe must launch his mechanized armies upon new fields of slaughter, pillage and devastation. Poor as are the Russian peasants, workmen and soldiers, he must steal from them their daily bread. He must devour their harvests. He must rob them of the oil which drives their ploughs and thus produce a famine without example in human history.
..
The Nazi regime is indistinguishable from the worst features of Communism. It is devoid of all theme and principle except appetite and racial domination. It excels in all forms of human wickedness, in the efficiency of its cruelty and ferocious aggression. Noone has been a more consistent opponent of Communism than I have for the last twenty-five years. I will unsay no words that I’ve spoken about it. But all this fades away before the spectacle which is now unfolding.
The past, with its crimes, its follies and its tragedies, flashes away. I see the Russian soldiers standing on the threshold of their native land, guarding the fields which their fathers have tilled from time immemorial. I see them guarding their homes; their mothers and wives pray, ah yes, for there are times when all pray for the safety of their loved ones, for the return of the breadwinner, of the champion, of their protectors.
“I see the 10,000 villages of Russia, where the means of existence was wrung so hardly from the soil, but where there are still primordial human joys, where maidens laugh and children play I see advancing upon all this, in hideous onslaught, the Nazi war machine, with its clanking, heel-clicking, dandified Prussian officers, its crafty expert agents, fresh from the cowing and tying down of a dozen countries..
About TimeParticipantChutznik:
Comparing Churchill to Mandela
is like to comparing the Chofetz Chaim to Teddy Kollek
About TimeParticipantSadly, There are alot of gullible fools
Let this be for a lesson.
EVERYTHING that the world is making a big deal about is all to have that effect on masses(alot of you).It’s most or all of your MakeUp.
To the leaders sitting at the funeral,this is ‘poshut’ as day
All South Africans who regularly complain & whine about their crime rate and general downward spiral of their region,ought to give pause as to the catalyst.
That the USSR,The Big Capitalists, and local marxists (guess ,of course,which background),were his strongest support imply something positive about Apartheid
(Who made the myth that Capitalists and Communists are enemies?)
Up until he became president he was a communist supported terrorist committed to the one cause of breaking apartheid.
Without the bigger forces,he would have been worth Zero.
Maybe a footnote in some text.
After he became president his job was reconciliation and governing South Africa in order for it not to become the next failed african nation like Zimbabwe or Congo.
And he was mediocre at it.
imagine a man who took a country from food self sufficiency and brought starvation to the masses. imagine a man who took safe streets and turned them into crime ridden jungles. and you will have a portrait of mandela AFTER his big reformation .
About TimeParticipant“When I studied in the Mir (Poland) there were 400 Bochurim in the Yeshiva, 100 of them were on the level that they could be Roshei Yeshiva. The objective in Yeshiva was to (translated)CHANGE,” Rabbi Wolbe said in a Shmuess.
[Changing; the Mashgiach elaborated at many other opportunities, refers to one’s adapting to the climate of the Yeshiva.
“The Yeshiva doesn’t want you to be ‘Frummer’, the Yeshiva doesn’t want you to be ‘Better’, the Yeshiva wants you to Change”, he would frequently quote the Alter of Slabodka. Changing means that one’s value system is not the same as it was when he entered Yeshiva. One’s interests, topics of conversation, goals in life are all formed and adapted by the Torah and the Rebbeim, not the street.]
October 9, 2013 11:41 pm at 11:41 pm in reply to: Meeting girls on the street for dating purposes #978038About TimeParticipantEvery female who ever put on makeup,etc.,
touched her hair,etc.,
wished to be the center of someone’s attraction
Call it what you will
..Here comes the denials
October 9, 2013 10:53 pm at 10:53 pm in reply to: Meeting girls on the street for dating purposes #978034About TimeParticipantBelow say 25/6 you follow the system
After that Go for It
Ignore what the females here say: they’re all in denial
October 9, 2013 10:31 pm at 10:31 pm in reply to: Why no mention of Rav Ovadiah in Monsey/Lakewood, etc. #978769About TimeParticipantYussel:His whole methodology was questionable.
His Yir’a and lack of agendae allowed us to hold our peace.
Ask those who know a thing or two
(I refrained from saying at first ,but you forced my hand)
Ferd
Your comments are as funny as your name 🙂
Rav Shachter (a family friend) can hardly be regarded as representative of YU
October 9, 2013 6:46 pm at 6:46 pm in reply to: Why no mention of Rav Ovadiah in Monsey/Lakewood, etc. #978759About TimeParticipantcont..
4.To keep up the pretense to their traditional and orthodox mass following(i.e.including most of you cofferoomers )that they are less anti than they indeed are..
October 9, 2013 5:03 pm at 5:03 pm in reply to: Why no mention of Rav Ovadiah in Monsey/Lakewood, etc. #978756About TimeParticipantYungerman from Lakewood hit the nail on it’s head
(hmm,did YU skip Divrei Hesped for R’ Elyashiv
..seems there’s an agenda)
R’ Ovadia zt”l if there’s a comparison to be made has been more publicized by far due to:
1.the media wants to imply Rabbi is must be someone only if useful for the benighted masses
2.the media(,internet included,who fought and hated him till this week)wish to turn him into something so big,
that now if anyone so chooses to challenge much of his manifold leniencies ,will be shouted down by
those same masses
2.As a slight to others whose influence penetrated differently but heavier
From An Ashkenazi who tore his shirt on the news of the Petirah
-
AuthorPosts