Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
This type of war will only stop when Iran decides to stop, as long as Iran has funds it will continue wage war via it’s proxy’s. By hitting their oil pipeline especially at their port’s where they transfer the oil to ships will greatly hinder their ability to sell their oil which is the main funding source. At the same time Iran’s nuclear stockpile needs to be destroyed. Israel knows where they are and by using bunker busting bombs should be able to destroy both the stockpiles and their nuclear research labs.
The way to defeat Hamas is by taking over the tunnels which can be done by using EMP bombs which will fry the electronics in the tunnel without hurt humans. Once the electronics are eliminated the IDF can easily take over the tunnel network. Hamas terrorist and kidnap victims are probably down there also. So this is the easiest way to eliminate Hamas.
I doubt Bibi is going to be blamed since unlike previous PM the army and the intelligence were calling for his resignation. Also having a unity government lets him blame his opponents if the war goes bad.
I don’t know if this is true, but if it is I think the Religious parties should ban together to decertify the hospital. Also I think Shas is in charge of Health Portfolio so it shouldn’t be hard to do especially after the doctor’s one day strike protesting the current governments judicial overhaul.
The Keenest has the power to lower the budget and here are a few example when they did. When Lapid’s Party was in charge weren’t there cut’s in the aid to Haredi families and to yeshivas. Were these not cuts to their budget. Likewise, wasn’t the Arab sector promised Billion of Shekels in aid in order to get them to be part of the government and when Likud came in power the Arab sector’s budget was cut. So it does happen. The Supreme Court did not put a stay on the judicial overhaul law just agreed to hear the case. Another thing the government can due is make a law that the Supreme Court must reflect the population of Israel. So if the Haredis make up 20% of the population then 20% of the Supreme Court should be Haredi. Thereby diluting the power of the leftist.
If they really wanted to curb the judiciary they would let the supreme court override the new law curbing the judiciary’s power and then cut the court’s budget by 10% for the following year. That is one thing the court can’t override. I think it may take a year or two before they play nice.
You do know that the Chacham Zvi poses the question as to whether a Golem can be counted towards a minyan.
This will only increase the cost for the consumer. While they maybe able to control what is sold in local stores these items can easily be bought on the internet from out of state. This is going to be difficult to enforce because the meat processing plants buy the pigs from farmers who may not be in compliance.
The difference is choice. The boycott is just finding another source for bread and baked goods, while electricity, the choice is either use it or not on Shabbos. Most Jews can’t not survive without electricity for 24 hours or longer nor afford private generators for Shabbos. Also a lot has changed in the last 60 years as to how electricity is generated and who works on Shabbos ie. non Jews in order to avoid desecrating the Shabbos.
This is the age of the Moshiach and many hold the world will only exist 6,000 years. Thus, there is only 216 and a half years until the latest time for Moshiach to come and the end of the world as we know it.
There is nothing we can do, it is totally in the hands of G-d. Anything they do only creates more problems.I have 6 children 4 daughters 2 sons all of them happily married with children of their own. One of my daughters didn’t get married until her mid30s so I am aware of the ” I am never going to be married crisis”.
My solution is to get involved with shidduch groups and subscribe to a database, this way you will get a listing of resumes of available boys. Get a friend or relative to act as the shaddchun and call up their shaddchan. This way you will get your daughter dates with boys who are at least trying to get married as opposed to trying to convince a boy who thinks he is to young to get married to start dating. Writing letters to YWN and waiting by the phone isn’t the solution.I live in NYC which is above the Mason Dixon Line while you live below the Mason Dixon line. Most Jews and I think most Americans came to the US after the civil war, Most slave owners were rich and most of them lost all their wealth by the end of the war and moved. If they were bto claim thrir ancestor were slave owners it would be difficult to prove, And they would open themselves up to lawsuits from the heirs of slaves. With art work that was stolen by the Nazis where the art work is entact and their are records of ownership in most cases the heirs don’t win so why do you think slave owner’s heirs will get anything when blacks haven’t got anything and they have a movement to get it for years.
What about compensation for all the distruction when Sherman went through the south
Who would want to publicize that their ancestor’s owned slaves. Even if they could do they have proof as most records were probably destroyed during the war or in the over 160 years since the end of the civil war. It’s not like the WWII that ended just 77 years ago and there are still people that lived through it
Most people are children of emigrants who came after the civil war and even the ones who lived in the south very few were rich enough to afford slaves and probaly died out.I did not read the post.If you are looking to get rid of them try asking Chabad they might try taking them off your hands. If you are trying to get them try Pinters on 14th Ave in Boro park or there is a store on Ave L off coney in Brooklyn, NY where you can get them for about $1 or even free.
.50 mistaken for .05. As a general rule the prescription is written by a doctor who may have a sloppy handwriting. I have found errors where a zero was misinterperted as a decimal. This should have been caught by the pharmacist. Nurses usually don’t question doctor’s orders. Today most prescriptions are ordered by computer and if this was 10 times the usual strength the computer should have questioned it even if the pharmacist wasn’t involved.
I am not sure if the commuter line goes bankrupt the pension obligation is voided. In many cases it is run by a government agency and the taxpayer are on the hook. It should be noted that the Railroad Pension Fund is similiar to Social Security but seems to pay more.
I think you meant rating not raring,
His party controls both houses of congress but he can’t deliverForget about mass transit. If workers don’t come back to the office cities are going to lose a lot in taxes both from real estate taxes and income taxes. If tenant are not using office buildings they are not paying rent and the landlord can’t pay the real estate taxes. Likewise the workers don’t have to come to the office they can live in a less taxing area resulting in a loss of income tax revenue to the city.Also it will have a rippling effect on the local economy as these workers will not be spending money for things like lunch and shopping in the city
Now Biden is claiming the 2022 midterm election which haven’t even taken place are illegitimate. Getting to sound a lot like Trump. The Democrat’s problem with Sinema & Manchim is that if they anger either one of them they can switch parties and change which party runs the Senate. Both of them are from states which Republican voters out number Democtrats so if they run a primary opponent the only thing that will happen is the Republican candidate will win.
I don’t see a problem. He rented a container to fill with garbage for one week. At the end of the period they are suppose to pick it up and drop the garbage at the dump. The vendor didn’t pick it up until a week later, not the renter’s fault. The purpose of the rental was to get rid of garbage not to rent a garbage container
Jackk Now you are claiming that although this was a proper traffic stop and they were trying to arrest a person with an outstanding gun warrant, which means he missed a court appearance on a gun charge, resisting arrest and possibly injuring some of yhe police officers. But some how if he is shot while getting away it’s a Police Assassination. According to you the criminal is always right.
Jackk you are also making my point if the courts are saying that a police officer can’t be considered afraid for their life and use a taser or gun in these cases there will be fewer car stops. More people will die from DUI for example. Do you realy think the average drunk will stop if he knows the cops are not going to shoot. More criminals on the street means more crime. You want our streets to look like the wild west of old where everyone took the law into their own hands.
Police management not the police officer, will have to decide how to solve this problem. Tactics are going to have to change so instead of trying to taser the driver a tear gas grenade will be tossed in.
What happens if you, with decades of driving experience gets into an accident? Do you go to jail? Do you lose your license to drive? I don’t think so.All this will do is discourage the Police from arresting criminals. No different than defund the police and no bail. The more criminals out there the more crime being committed.
Jackk Basically you are admitting that you do not have enough evidence to convict. While you may not admit that it is just partisan bickering but since there is not enough evidence to convict that is what it is.
If the coup was done by the lawyers… why are the demonstraters being sentenced so harshly and none of the politcians sentenced? Can you name another coup taken place by demonstrators in which they were unarmed?2cents I think the comment might be, can the president actions in this case be interperted as an attempt to intimidate future juries in similiar cases. Yes it’s a free country not like some others where if you vote against the ruling class you end up dead.
If the media hadn’t vilifed Mr. Rittenhouse I doubt anyone would have heard of him and he probably would never been charged. As far as the media covering up for Biden he is their man . However if you hlisten to the Biden administration it’s the opposite, they claim the media is bias against them. If you don’t believe you can google yourself.
Rittenhouse wasn’t being honored for killing or wounding anyone. It was for defending himself with a gun. He was the posterboy for those against gun controll. He is milking his fame to make as much money has he can before he is forgotten.
Kim Potter, a cop charged with mansluagther is another example of someone being unjustly prosecuted.I have been accused of being in De Nile. although I have never been in Eygpt in my life. But I still don’t understand how you can call it a coup or insurrection when the people demonstrating are unarmed. And are going against armed police. Do you realy think the armed forces wouldn’t stand up for the duly elected government?
As far as the 1/6 commission is concerned, it’s a hatchet job trying to discredit Trump like the Impeachment. So anything produce by it is suspect of being partisan. If there was anything to it, the Justice Department would have indicted Trump.I think the country is heading down the path to a civil war. Biden was elected under the impression that he was a uniter but that is not the case. The claim that 1/6/21 was some type of coup doesn’t make sense as no one except the police were armed with firearms. The only one shot was an unarmed veteran.
In the meantime the democtrats are firing members of the police and armed forces who refuse to be vaccinated. Biden has put in place mandates which will deny them the ability to get new jobs. Do you think they are going to sit around and do nothing.
This is very similiar to Germany in the 1920s. Remember that the Nazis won in 1933 even with intimadation and counting the votes, they were only able to get 43.9% of the votes. While Biden won 51% of the vote vs Trump 47% in the election, his current polls is 38%.
The midterm elections are in less than a year away. The question is are democrats and independents tired of the lawlessness that they will vote for Republicans.This evolving into a Democratic Ploy against President Trump where evidence and charges keep evolving, which work in impeachment where anything goes, but not in criminal court. Or to quote former President Clinton “it all depends on what is means”. You keep changing what you claim you mean.
In Manhattan one of the most liberal counties in New York State and perhaps the country, the DA Cy Vance has been trying to indict Trump & his company for over 2.5 years without success, This is eventhough there is a saying “You can indict a ham sandwich”. The reason is that anyone can be indicted but once it comes to the trial the case will be dismissed unless there is evidence to support it.
The DA has hundreds if not thousands of cases pending at any given time. All of these cases have been investigated by the Police or Sherriff’s office and are awaiting prosecution. Why would the DA take on a new case which he has to investigate and subpoena evidence before he can prosecute?
The vast majority of the hundreds of backlogged cases are violent cases, so why is your fraud case going to get precedent esspecially when you are not articulating how the DA is going to win a conviction.A few years ago the House Democrats tried to get then President Trump’s Tax Return claiming fraud, which they never got. But in Manhattan, one of the most liberal counties in New York State the DA Cy Vance was able to get a copy of Trump’s New York State’s Return. He has grand juries investigating but has never indicted Trump. Yet Trump has been impeached twice by Congress during this period. Cy Vance will be out of office by the end of the month so who knows if the new DA will continue the investigation as the statute of limitation is 6 years from the date of occurrence or two years from the fraud was found out. This was suppose to be an open and shut case. Yet even though Manhattan is the most liberal county in NY they couldn’t find enough evidence to indict President Trump, one of the most hated Presidents of fraud. This is because proving fraud in a court of law is very hard.
I am just curious how the judge will sign an arrest warrant without first recieving a “True Biil” from a Grandl Jury. I do realize that in 2 states they don’t require grand juries but 48 state and the DC require a Grand Jury Indictment prior to an arrest warrant. In those states that don’t require grand jury upon arrest the DA must provide evidence at a probable cuase hearing which is the first hearing after the arrest which the judge must determine iif there is adequate evidence that he committed the crime.
As a general rule, the prosecutor must notify the defendant and allow him to testify at the grand jury telling his side of the story. The defendent is allowed to testify and is allowed to consult with his attorney who is not present at the grand jury. Any testimony given at a grand jury can be used against the witness at trail. The prosecuter can cross examine the defendant and then the prosecuter reads the law and leaves the grandjury to decide to indict or not. When they indict it is called a true bill meaning the DA has enough evidence to charge the defendant.
As a general rule if the defendent has a logical explanation the grandj ury will side with him. In your case you have evidence that the husband lives in his ex-wife’s house for over a week. That doesn’t prove that the divorce is a fraud.
I don’t know what type of evidence the DA is going to subpoena. Nor do I know what evidence the PI will provide. A subponea is a document ordering someone to appear in court. Since the only people with knowledge of the divorce are the husband and the wife beside the court itself whose documents are readily available to the DA. The husband and wife are just going to testify that they are legally divorced. I am not really sure what purpose the subpeonas are going to accomplish other than waste everybodies time.
I am not sure the DA even has probable cause that fraud was even committed.
The fact that the husband is still living in the house with his wife is not grounds to invalidate the divorce in most states including NY & NJ as they can live together before and after the divorce. And even in the states that require seperate living quarters that is before the divorce will be granted not after. So if the PI can submitt evidence that they lived together during the 180-365 day prior to the date the divorce was granted in a state that requires seperation during that period then the divorce maybe invalidated, but that should be handled in divorce court which is civil court not criminal court.
As far as having a different address on his tax return and government id, this is only that he has a place to stay in case his wife kicks him out.
Just like the Rittenhouse case as long as the defendent has a logical explanation the jury and judge are going to side with him. You are falling for the same logic as the DA in the Riienhouse case just becuase you say it’s fraud doesn’t mean it’so.Unless your talking about some make believe evidence that your PI has uncovered.I am not trying to provide anyone legal service and anyone can simple verify any of my claims listed below by googling them on the internet:
1) There are internet based services that will help you with the paperwork needed to file a divorce. One of which charges $135.00. There will also be court filing fees which vary state to state.
2) You can live in the same house while gatting divorced and even after it’sfinalized in most states If you need a date of seperation for the divorce paperwork. use the date you decided to seperate.
3) A creditor may seize assets in which your name and social security number is associated with. There are an exceptions for retirement benifits and some government benifits.
4) The maximum that can be garnished is 25% of the salary after taxes or in some states 10% of the gross salary.
5) Always answer a summons to civil court. If you fail to answer the plaintiff may win a defualt judgement, Which mean he won the case If it’s the first time you can ask the judge for a continunace and he will set another court date you just need an excuse.
If the husband is scared a creditor will garnish his wages, He can divorce his wife in secular civil court, transfer all his assete ie house bank and investment account to be solely in her name and give her child support or alimony of over 25% of his disposible income. Thereby giving the creditor no where to collect from. The balance of his income is deposit into a seperate account under a relitive’s name. He will only be able to use it via internet banking.
He can sleep in his own bed and there is nothing the creditor can do. The debtor can declare bankruptcy and possibly get the debt discharged. If he does he can remarry his ex-wife civily.The problem that you fail to understand is the judge’s dockets are full. In order for the the judge to even consider granting him a hearing the DA may discuss the case with judge in between cases, but he must be able to provide evidence the divorce was a fraud and convience the judge that it was fruad beyond a reasonable doubt. The only evidence is a private eye claiming that the ex-husband stayed over night and the husband may have just cuase for being there.. If the ADA fails not only will he not get his hearing but get a dressing down and it’s doubtful the next time he needs a hearing he will not get it.
Judges do not like to delay docket becuase criminal will be denied speedy trail and go free. Divorce is a Civil Court and DA’s working in Criminal Court.Divorce is final and the divor,ce agreement can only be adjusted by the husband and wife.THe DA is an uninterested party in this matter. While a Criminal Court Judge may want to hear the ADA’s request. A Civil Court Judge may not even be so sympathetic to hear the ADA out as he is just creating more work when the whole civil court is backlogged. Without invalidating the divorce it’s impossible to prove fraud.
As far as delaying trials is concern, Mr Brooks who ran over and killed 6 people had his bail reduced from $10,000 to $1,000.00 becuaser his trial was delayed.
As far as my friend is concerned he kept finding victims and bring them to the DA’s office until the DA decided to prosecute. They made a plea deal and he got his money back and the defendant got probation.
Providing legal services without a license for a fee is a crime in all state punishable by fines and or jail time.In order for fraud to be proven the divorce must be invalidated and the child support likewise invalidated. The only problem is that neither the creditor nor the DA have any legal standing in divorce cases. Without invalidating the divorce there is no fraud. Even if you could have a judge open the divorce case to invalidate the case both sides need to be heard in order for a ruling to be made.
With the courts backed up due to covid it may take years until a hearing is made in this divorce case.
Mean time the clock is running out on your fraud case, assuming this is a felony case you have 3 years from the date the husband filed for divorce to bring the case. I have a friend who gave his son-in-law money for a down payment. The seller backed out of the sale and the money wasn’t returned. He sued both in a din torah and civil court won both times could collect referred the matter to the Ocean County DA’s office in NJ got nowhere.A divorce ss is child support are court orders that can only be overturned by a judge. As a general rule testimony by a privite eye can be used by one of the parents to adjust the child support. The evidence that the private eye is providing is just that the husband stayed over at his ex-wifes home. There can be reason why he did so such as his child wasn’t feeling well. Can an outside party not the husband or wife invalidate a divorce? If the creditor can invalidate the divorce from what date? From the date the witness saw the husband staying over there or from the date of the judge ruling in the matter. In any case the child support was in force from the date of divorce and is seperate it is doubtful that the judge will remove the child support garnishment.
The statute of limitation in NY State is 1 year for petty offenses, 2 years for misdemeanors and three years for felonies. Since someone thinks a crime was committed.
As far as social security being garnishment proof you are allowed to keep two monthss worth of social security in your bank account anything over that can be garnished by your creditor.
As far as the government coming after me, no crime has been committed You don’t want to say what criminal act was commited. With the backlog in the criminal courtts it”s doubtful the DA’s office will want to prosecute the case. It will depend on can they prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.