Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 11, 2018 1:42 pm at 1:42 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16416342scentsParticipant
Dooms,
“Folks, was the debate on Why CDC refuses to do Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed ? Or a debate on MMR Vaccine as 2Cents lies? (and calls me an βIdiotβ for saying the debate was on Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed study)”
I am actually enjoying this, now the focus is if what I posted was a lie or not, great! now facts are not important and you consider this a win to a debate.
However, as I have pointed out many times, this is not a debate I am looking to win rather the facts and truth is what form my opinion, the study was to compare MMR vaccinated vs unvaccinated. The discussion was about autism which was only blamed (by wakefield) on the MMR vaccine.
Unlike you, I have not told you to go an google anything, I have posted actual studies with the intention that you and others will actually review them, these are not lies or twisting the truth. this is the actual truth.
If you had the impression that I intended to imply that the studies I listed concluded something else than I implied, I had made this clear earlier that this was not the case, so what is your point here?
Also, you have not responded, do you now acknowledge that the studies showing that the MMR vaccine is not linked to autism (which was the only vaccine that was blamed to cause autism) prove that there is no link?
What OTHER studies are you looking for?
You just keep on accusing me of lying, this is not about me, this is about the facts, seems like you have a problem with the facts, so you just hang on to accusations. fine with me.
December 11, 2018 12:01 pm at 12:01 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16415442scentsParticipantDooms,
“Here is 2Cents Lying that there ARE vaxxed vs unvaxxed retrospective studies. But when I checked out the studies that 2Cents βpointed outβ they are NOT vaxxed vs unvaxxed!!! And 2Cents writes that she KNEW they were not vaxxed vs unvaxxed when she posted that they WERE!”
A. In case anyone was complimenting Dooms on being only on the facts and not on the name calling, well here you have Dooms calling me a liar, Guess what, your an idiot.
you know you are an idiot? Because myself and others have addressed this very point you just made numerous times, yet you continue to bring it up as if you are adding some substance.
Yes, this IS a retrospective study, and yes, it is limited to the MMR vaccine, where have I lied??I have mentioned this many times, this is about the MMR vaccine, which was the topic at the time that this was posted, however you are either very dumb or just a fraud so you hang your arguments on twisting the truth which is why most people that actually rely on true facts and true data are not with you in your cult-like anti-medicine belief.
B. I have asked you specifically, what exactly do you want should be studied that has not been studied?
C. Autism, that has been the claim against the MMR vaccine, that has been proven to be non-existent.
D. All other diseases that we are seeing these days, have been studied with no correlation between the diseases and the vaccines. In fact, the vaccinated group has shown to have less of these diseases.
E. SIDS, no correlation, in fact, there is a significant reduction with vaccinations. Just in case you will twist this one, not just SIDS has seen a significant reduction, postneonatal mortality, in general, has also seen a significant reduction, so whichever way you or your people at these radical fringe blogs want to twist this, there is a reduction. (lol to the comment about nurses standing by with crash carts for infants that are being vaccinated).
F. The history of anti-vaccine is not recent, this has been ongoing since the very start. From claiming that smallpox is not dangerous to the point of arguing that disease is caused by the mind and the ‘germ theory’ is not true. Of course, we have Wakefield with his fraudulent study that began blaming the MMR vaccine on autism.
His study was confirmed to be a manipulation of incorrect facts, he reported results that were false and did not even take the effort to defend his writings.So once again, where did I lie in this thread (I can point to numerous times that you have either intentionally lied or simply just posted what others have lied about) and also, what study are you looking for?
December 10, 2018 5:12 pm at 5:12 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16408052scentsParticipantLucy,
“Good to see someone whoβs done their research, well done to you and for sharing it here. Most people just assume the science on vaccines has already been performed, it is only those who look deeper who discover that it hasnβt”
Nothing personal against Doomsday, however almost everything that Dooms posted was proven to be incorrect, most of the posts are directly copied from age of autism site, not sure why you are patting dooms on the back about this.
December 10, 2018 5:12 pm at 5:12 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16407882scentsParticipantDooms,
“Based on WHAT STUDIES did Vaccine Industry CHANGE the Vaccine Inserts from Recently Vaccinated ARE a Risk of spreading Disease to Recently Vaccinated are βlittle riskβ of Spreading Disease???”
Why are you giving out homework?
If you really want to know, do a quick search, its the age of information. One example below.
PubMed15106106
December 10, 2018 3:54 pm at 3:54 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16407452scentsParticipantLucy,
“Iβm illustrating the fact that when you get away from the whitewashing sites and articles, you do see the industry themselves admitting that vaccines can cause crib death/SIDS.”
Or, you see how the healthcare industry actually advises of these risks which means that this should be taken into consideration, not an admission not a whitewashing.
This is actually THE websites that advise about the safety of vaccines, they do advise about this very concern.
December 10, 2018 3:53 pm at 3:53 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16407512scentsParticipantDooms,
“But you are WRONG! These studies compare Vaxxed Children with Vaxxed Children β only difference is some got MMR and some did not! So it is NOT a Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Study as You Provaxxers said it was.”
You are correct, this is only focused on the MMR vaccine, this is what I intended to show when I posted these studies.
Are you acknowledging the safety of the MMR shots by now moving away from the MMR and acknowledging these studies only to focus on other vaccines??are there any specific vaccines that you make any claims to?
December 10, 2018 2:05 pm at 2:05 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16406572scentsParticipantLucy,
“If one looks at the package insert for live vaccines such as MMR, there are warnings given that you can shed the virus onto others.”
From Merck.
“There are no reports of transmission of live attenuated measles or mumps viruses from vaccinees to
susceptible contacts.”From CDC website:
“Some vaccinees intermittently shed small amounts of virus from the pharynx 7-28 days after vaccination. However, studies of greater than 1,200 susceptible household contacts and experience gained over 20 years of vaccine use failed to identify transmission of vaccine virus. These findings indicate that vaccinating susceptible children whose mothers or other household contacts are pregnant does not present a risk. Rather, vaccination of such children provides protection for these pregnant women. ”
No whitewashing here.
December 10, 2018 1:46 pm at 1:46 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16406482scentsParticipantLucy,
Not sure what your point is, this seems like a pretty clear advisory and warning from the pharmaceutical company, not a whitewash.
in fact, it seems that the inserts you are quoting is in line what was published in Pediatrics.
“Apnea occurring within 72 hours (peak, 12β24 hours) of administration of DTwP vaccine to ELBW infants <31 weeksβ gestation was described in up to 12% of recipients of whole-cell pertussis-containing vaccines in some studies”.
Once we’re at it, any viral or bacterial infection for these smaller infants are considered dangerous and deadly.
December 10, 2018 1:01 pm at 1:01 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16406092scentsParticipantDaasYochid,
This is from the Study.
“Abstract
We use data from the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey (CLHNS) in the Philippines to link vaccination in the first 2 years of life with later physical and cognitive development in children. We use propensity score matching to estimate the causal effect of vaccination on child development. We find no effect of vaccination on later height or weight, but full childhood vaccination for measles, polio, Tuberculosis (TB), Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus (DPT) significantly increases cognitive test scores relative to matched children who received no vaccinations. The size of the effect is large, raising test scores, on average, by about half an SD.”Of course, this is just a correlation, does this mean that vaccines actually make people smarter? Probably not.
This would not be a reason for one to vaccinate, nor is this part of the argument.There might be other factors on why children whose parents decided to vaccinate them scored better. However, if the results would have been the other way around, I am sure that the anti-vaxxers would have been all over this.
December 10, 2018 11:34 am at 11:34 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16404992scentsParticipantDooms,
”
“I asked you if these studies were vaxxed vs unvaxxed and you said yes, they were.
NO, they are NOT. I donβt blame you. The researchers and government”This is not fraud, not sure why you have to label them like this, its only focused on the MMR vaccine, why does this constitute fraud??
For now, can you lay to rest that there are studies comparing children with the MMR vaccine to children without the MMR vaccine which show that there is no difference to autism?
What other studies are you looking for?
There are studies comparing cognitive test scores that were done in the Philippines. Vaccinated children scored better.
Regarding asthma and allergies, vaccinated children had a lower rate of those.December 10, 2018 9:47 am at 9:47 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16403622scentsParticipantDooms,
“The point is, Recently Vaccinated children CAN be contagious”
Where are you taking this from? You just concluded that you erred and this is not the case.
2scentsParticipantIf the primary reason as to why Mr Rowe is stepping down was due to this being against daas torah, this would be a very valid reason and Mr Rowe should have said so, not just mention in passing reference that Rav Epstien also holds of his opinion.
2scentsParticipantDaasYochid,
“What it comes down to is that on several levels, accepting insurance is likely to have a negative affect on Hatzolaβs effectiveness, as well as increase the likelihood of a chillul Hashem occurring.”
Why do you say so?
This has been done by many different Hatzolahs yet there has been no change on the side of patient care, this is only on the financial end.
Furthermore, at times Hatzolah would ‘privatize’ transports, this usually occurs when they cannot get members to respond to a call, now there will be an incentive for those that manage the organization to have sufficient coverage and cover all calls, otherwise it means a loss of revenue and more difficult to cover their operating budget.
again, the members will still be volunteers, the structure and character would not change. Only instead of completely relying on funds from the community, they will get much more by collecting insurance money that is already there, it only needs to be collected.
I am not dismissing the argument on the opposing side, I have no clue about the specifics and it may very much be that there are valid reasons against billing insurance for transports that they already do, I just have just not yet heard a valid argument.
2scentsParticipantβ2scents and Milhouse are clearly pushing an agenda, are you a pediatrician that get paid for vaccinating your patients?β
I cannot speak for others, but I prefer to base my position on facts and real science. When you or others oost nonsense and expect to get away with it, all I do is expose the truth. that in its own is an agenda.
Now of course, once you reach a point of not being able to validate the conspiracy you so strongly believe in, you just blame everyone of being involved.
If only your agenda would be to know the true facts you wouldn’t be so defensive, you would appreciate that lies and made up data is not something most people are ok with.
2scentsParticipantSariray,
Without even addressing your other points, incorrect statements mean lies, she lied and has an agenda.
Now before repeating additional statements, it would make sense to actually verify them.
2scentsParticipantDaas,
All of this is assumptions, there are a number of other hatzolahs that collect from insurance and have been doing this for a very long time.
Has it impacted their care to the community in a negative way?
Do these areas base transports decisions on insurance compensation?If the answer is no, then these assumptions are proven to be incorrect.
The answer is no. It so happens to be that the hatzolahs that have been collecting insurance are known to go the distance and transport decisions are based on the patients needs.
2scentsParticipantAnonymous,
There are billing companies that handle this, they would reach out to the hospital to obtain insurance information.
2scentsParticipantMammele,
In that case, insurance will not compensate for the transport to the distant facility and will only pay the cost of s shorter transport.
Unless there is a justification such as a required intervention that only the further facility is able to do.
2scentsParticipantRegarding Polio in India, grossly incorrect.
Vaccinations were below 60% until the government got involved, India is currently Polio free a direct result from vaccinations.
Not only are the facts incorrect, they actually prove the opposite.
2scentsParticipantA. What fraud? They should have a quality assurance system like every ems system has, all documentation should be reviewed, if done properly there shouldnt an issue with fraud.
B. Insurance does not dictate what treatment should or should not be done, they may refuse payment, yet the ems responders do not treat according to what insurance pays.
Besides, government already controls ems treatment and protocols.
C. I hope they have a solution to the legal technicalities.
However this is already done for a very long time in a lot if different hatzolah systems, if it works for them, it should work for others.
2scentsParticipantJoseph,
Here are some of the answers
A. Polio never existed.
B. It never killed anyone, never paralyzed anyone.
C. Its still here, just under another name.
D. It decided to disappear on its own.
E. All the above.2scentsParticipantUbiquitin,
You make valid points and I am not familiar with the structure. However you call them private and for profit, are the hatzolohs that already collect private and for profit agencies?
Is it a bad thing that they no longer will be dependent on our donations to cover their operating budget?
2scentsParticipantThere are a number of technicalities such as copays and documentation, I hope they have this all figured out.
I do not believe that the infrastructure or the patient care side, which is what we, the public is exposed to will change one bit. Other than having more finances for better equipment and more stuff that will enhance patient care.
They will still remain a volunteer agency regardless if they collect insurance or not.
From what I understand Catskill Hatzolah has already collected from insurance and several other areas are doing this for many years, has that had any negative impact on their patient care, are those areas now considered βprivateβ or they are still volunteer based?
The members are not getting paid, instead insurance is being collected to cover operating expenses and purchase of new ambulances and equipment.
The Hatzolah model seems to have a greater cost compared to the traditional ems model, they need to outfit individual units vs just outfiting an ambulance.
Regardless, I am not very familiar with the opposing positions and I am sure that there compelling arguments against collecting insurance money.
December 7, 2018 9:16 am at 9:16 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16391802scentsParticipantHealth,
I read most of that case, there is no mention of the cotwatch, furthermore, the court acknowledges that there is no evidence that the shot was connected to the SIDS, there were many other possible factors including the fact that the child was born prematurely and was recently taken to the hospital for respiratory complaints.
Also, the child was found face down, with a pillow and loose blanket.
Yet the court ruled that the parents do not have the burden of proving the link, and the pharmaceutical company has not proven that there was a different cause to the SIDS.
December 6, 2018 11:47 pm at 11:47 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16390712scentsParticipantDooms,
Other than a few Facebook posts and some silly radical anti-medicine sites, I have not seen any information about the CotWatch you so strongly hold by.
As requested earlier, it would be appreciated if you can point me in the direction of more information. So I do not have to take your word for it. (it has to be more than her word, or some blog or Facebook post),
Even modern apnea monitors are worthless, they beep nonstop and are grossly inaccurate, let alone the monitor that she alone designed a very long time ago.
December 6, 2018 11:26 pm at 11:26 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16390632scentsParticipantDooms,
“Wrong! Thimerosal was NOT removed. It was shuffled around. When it was EXPOSED that the amount of
mercury in vaccines exceeded EPA safety guidelines,”Would you mind pointing out which CHILDREN vaccine still contain Thimerosal?
Furthermore, now that it has been removed from all Children vaccines and is only used in SOME flu vaccines (multi-dose vials), has that affected the rate of autism?
I will repeat, unlike you stated, thimerosal has not been shifted around, no children vaccines still contain them, even the flu shots are available as single dose vials without Thimerosal.
So what you said is incorrect, others would call it a lie. (by the way, this has been discussed earlier yet you just fail to acknowledge it and keep on repeating this lie).
Where are you getting your (mis)information? is it from age of autism??
December 6, 2018 11:25 pm at 11:25 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16390652scentsParticipantDooms,
“I have a saved copy of the 2014 John Hopkins Patient Guide which DID state that the immunocompromised should avoid recently compromised. You can still see the 2014 Patient Guide online. Also the Vaccine Inserts
used to say that recently vaccinated can shed the virus for 6 weeks and should avoid the immunocompromised.”Your point?
The data shows otherwise, the advisories and patient guides have been updated to reflect what the data shows.
You, on the other hand, refuse to acknowledge that data and facts are what matter, so you will keep copies of old outdated manuals and live by them.
December 6, 2018 2:30 pm at 2:30 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16386792scentsParticipantDooms,
Is the source of your information the website age of autism??
“1. Johns Hopkins Patient Guide warns the immunocompromised to βAvoid contact with children who are recently vaccinated,β and to βTell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit”.
Can you please point out where the guide is?
This has long not been the case, in fact, John Hopkins went out of the way to clear this misconception and write that this is not the case and there is no risk even for cancer patients.
“2. Adults have contracted polio from recently vaccinated infants. A father from Staten Island ended up in a wheel chair after contracting polio while changing his daughterβs diaper. He received a 22.5 million dollar award in 2009.”
Adults, or just one case?
This was from the OPV, this happened nearly 30 years ago. The OPV vaccine is not given in the united states.December 6, 2018 1:55 pm at 1:55 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16386622scentsParticipantDooms.
“Talking to yourself? Arenβt you the one who repeated the Lie: βThere are NO studies linking Vaccines with Autism except for the fraudulent study by Wakefield.β”
Why is it a lie? I am still waiting for you to point me to one such study so I can review it.
Besides, the point was that YOU are just repeating stuff that have been refuted and earlier, yet you just repeat it again and again.
December 6, 2018 1:54 pm at 1:54 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16386602scentsParticipantDooms,
A. There are retrospective studies, I have pointed out a few, why are you still requesting them when they actually exist?
B. Can you please point me to a study that links vaccines to autism?
December 6, 2018 1:08 pm at 1:08 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16386002scentsParticipantDooms,
I admire your persistence, despite being proven incorrect you still keep on repeating the same statements as if they are facts.
December 6, 2018 12:07 pm at 12:07 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16385712scentsParticipantDooms,
Can you please provide the source for someone receiving compensation based on the Cotwath breathing?
Dr Scheibner claimed in 1993 that vaccines are the main contributor to SIDS, yet from 1992 until 2006 vaccination rates went from 53% to 92%, yet in the same time SIDS has decreased with 81%.
She does not have the credentials to have an opinion, the data she provided was proven to be incorrect, the Japan claims she madehas proven to just the opposite of what she claimed.
In fact, there are many studies done that show that vaccines actually reduce the cases of SIDS. PubMed 17400342.
As was mentioned earlier, Dr Scheiber was awarded the bent spoon aware. which is awarded to the perpetrator of the most preposterous piece of pseudoscientific piffle” (in case you didn’t realize, not much of a prestigious award).
So yes, the rest of the world does not fall for studies that are incorrect, studies that contain incorrect facts, so we discard her junk science and her little invention.
December 6, 2018 12:05 pm at 12:05 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16385802scentsParticipantDooms,
“Well the Provaxxers went crazy attacking Dr. Scheibner because she was not a Medical Doctor or a Medical Researcher but a GEOLOGIST! As if that matters! The ProVaxxers could not refute what Dr. Scheibner
PROVED so they resorted to attacking Dr. Scheibner.”I wrote a response to this, not sure why it did not go through.
Basically, her work was proven to be incorrect, the data she used was incorrect I will not go so far as to say she intentionally did so, yet I would not be surprised if she was bent on reaching her predetermined conclusion and falsified the data.
In short, in 1993 she wrote that in her book that vaccines are the main reason behind SIDS, however from 1992 until 2006, vaccine rates in Austraila went from 53% to 92%.
In the same time, SIDS had a 81% decrease.There are numerous studies that actually prove that vaccines are associated with reduced SIDS, (PubMed 17400342).
You mention that her Cotwatch breathing was used to win compensation, where is your source to this claim?
December 6, 2018 11:20 am at 11:20 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16385542scentsParticipantTurth,
“DR ROBERT MENDELSON
If immunizations were responsible for the diminishing or disappearance of these diseases in the United States, one must ask why they disappeared simultaneously in Europe, where mass immunizations did not take place.”I am sure that you are familiar with Dr Mendelsohn’s work, He was anti-medicine and had a whole list of stuff against medicine, including that male doctors, mistreat female patients.
He was also of the opinion that all prenatal care we do is dangerous, he also was a strong advocate against hospital births.He was not the only physician that was against vaccines,
Dr. Immanuel Pfeiffer argued that smallpox is not contagious. after being invited to a hospital in Boston he contracted smallpox and became critically ill.
Maybe if Dr. Mendelsohn would not be against medicine, he would still be alive today.
Being that some of you consider yourself pro measles and pro polio, how about we redo the challenge that was done in the early 1900s, and subject yourself to these yummy viruses.
Unfortunately, there are a number of recent hospitalizations and admissions to ICU of unvaccinated children that contracted the measles virus, they developed bad cases of pneumonia, these are the short-term complications.
These children are victims of their parents’ nonsensical belief that is based on garbage science.
December 6, 2018 11:19 am at 11:19 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16385572scentsParticipantBais Hillel,
your opinion is appreciated as, your opinion. However we were attempting to focus on the facts which unfortunately for the anti-vax and alternative thinking people, do not point in their direction.
I and others are not invested in one direction or in any belief. If you show me the science and it is well researched I will not have any problem changing my position, the same is with the rest of the world.
It is done all the time, treatment modalities have changed dramatically as science and evidence has become available.
If being caught with lies, studies that do not exist, studies that actually conclude the opposite of what you thought they imply, is something that sits well with you, you do have an alternative way of consuming information, but do not blame the rest of us in buying into your cause.
December 5, 2018 2:48 pm at 2:48 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16380712scentsParticipantDooms,
“Folks, it is Very Sad that Yserbius is incapable of understanding that just because He or the CDC does not AGREE with the 157 Studies Linking Vaccines to Autism, it is still a LIE to say There ARENβT any studies linking
Vaccines to Autism. Of course, there are.”That is NOT (Mods, sorry for the CAPS) what Yserbius has stated, not that they disagree with these studies (which may or may not be the case), only that they do not imply what you say that they imply.
At this point, I am fairly convinced that you are not such a rational person, more like an ‘alternative’ person.
December 5, 2018 2:15 pm at 2:15 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16380342scentsParticipantTruth,
Can you please point to where you get these number?
These increases that you posted do not account to the general decrease in infant mortality, even with the increase in other mortalities.
Also, it is the providers that decide on the diagnosis, not the CDC or other government agency.
December 5, 2018 2:04 pm at 2:04 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16380152scentsParticipantDooms,
“When you add up SIDS + Unknown Causes (whatβs difference?) + accidental suffocation / strangulation
you will the number of HEALTHY Babies dying in their sleep BARELY CHANGED!”Once again, you are twisting the truth.
Posted in Pediatrics.
Postneonatal deaths in total of have declined 21.9% where SIDS have declined 38.9%.
The increases in other areas (by a percent or so) are the reason why the overal postneonatal rate has not declined as much as the SIDS rate has declined.
Unlike you posted, there was an overall decline in postneonatal mortality. There has not been any change in name, SIDS is still SIDS, just like before all mortality up until the first year of age goes under the postneonatal category.
December 5, 2018 12:12 pm at 12:12 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16378802scentsParticipantTruth,
“In 1992, to address the unacceptable SIDS rate, the American Academy of Pediatrics initiated a βBack to Sleepβ campaign, convincing parents to place their infants supine, rather than prone, during sleep.
From 1992 to 2001, the postneonatal SIDS rate dropped by an average annual rate of 8.6%. However, other causes of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) increased.
For example, the postneonatal mortality rate from βsuffocation in bedβ (ICD-9 code E913.0) increased during this same period at an average annual rate of 11.2%.”Not sure if you understand the terms, postneonatal mortality includes SIDS, its basically any mortality that occurs between 28 days and 1 year of age.
This includes anything, yet the trend of unexplained deaths in infants have dropped significantly, while the mortality rate in other groups has also dropped yet not as significant.There is evidence based on studies that sleeping in the prone position, the mother having an unhealthy lifestyle and better neonatal care have an effect on SIDS.
December 5, 2018 11:49 am at 11:49 am in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16378352scentsParticipantDooms,
“I quoted from the Merck MANUAL which explains the causes of encephalitis as:”
Not sure why you are implying that this was not what I was referring to. You misquoted as if the Merck manual (or insert) implies that the MMR vaccine is not safe, it actually implies just the opposite, in fact, it clearly states the opposite.
I posted it and you just move on, as if nothing happened.As I stated earlier, you are either very dumb or just a fraud.
December 4, 2018 9:13 pm at 9:13 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16374302scentsParticipantDooms,
βI quoted from the Pediarix Insert, Not the MMR insert, 2scentsβ.
No one said otherwise, yet previously you misstated the MMR insert, you wrote something that was not true.
You have a track record of either being very dumb or a simple fraud.
No wonder you hold Wakefield in high regard.
December 4, 2018 9:13 pm at 9:13 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16374292scentsParticipantDooms,
As the study I posted earlier details the decline we see in sIDS yet more children receive vaccines than before, which demonstrates that SIDS have nothing to do with vaccines.
December 4, 2018 6:49 pm at 6:49 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16373542scentsParticipantDooms,
Is your moving on to a new argument that the other arguments have been exhausted and actually prove the opposite of what you claimed?
Can you have the decency to state that despite all the evidence you will still cling to your belief that vaccines are to blame for anything that happens to anyone?
December 4, 2018 6:40 pm at 6:40 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16373562scentsParticipantDooms,
You lied (or just reposted from some radical site) about the MMR insert, I posted the actual insert which clearly indicates the opposite of what you implied.
Do you have an agenda, because truth and facts are not your thing.
December 4, 2018 12:51 pm at 12:51 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16369552scentsParticipantDooms,
“Folks, Yserbius LIES that there Are NOT 157 research studies showing a link between vaccines and autism.
Google it and you will find the website on the 157 research studies showing a link between vaccines and autism in one minute!”You are really funny, while I have not googled it, many have and posted here that these studies do not imply what you say they do, yes they have the words autism and vaccines in them, yet they do not imply what you say they do.
Why are you not responding to these people, is it because you have not reviewed these studies?
December 4, 2018 12:43 pm at 12:43 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16369022scentsParticipantDooms,
This has been rehashed so many times, yet you just repeat it time after time as if no one has explained this to you.
Since you do not acknowledge the response, I would assume that your intention is not the facts, rather to overload the discussion with repetitive nonsense.
If you would appreciate a comprehensive review of the VAERS reporting system and the data, read below.
“This comprehensive review of death reports to VAERS for the period 1 July 1997 through 31 December 2013 indicates that the most common causes of death in VAERS were consistent with the leading causes of death in the US population (Table 6) [13]. The 2149 deaths described in this study were reported to VAERS during a period of time when approximately 2 billion doses of vaccine were distributed for use in the United States. This translates to roughly 1 reported death per 1 million doses of vaccine distributed. Because the majority of death reports were in children, the most common causes of death were in this age group. SIDS was the leading cause of death (28.1%) among all reports and accounted for 51.7% of death reports in infants, which is consistent with infant mortality data that place SIDS as the third leading cause of death in the United States among infants, after congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities; and disorders related to short gestation and low birthweight [13, 16]. The male predominance of death reports in our study is driven by SIDS reports in which males accounted for 62%. This is consistent with studies that found males to be at higher risk of SIDS [17]. SIDS occurs rarely during the first month of life and peaks between 2β3 months of age [17]. Because SIDS peaks at a time when children are receiving many recommended vaccinations, it would not be unexpected to observe a coincidental close temporal relationship between vaccination and SIDS [18]. SIDS deaths in the United States have been declining since the early 1990s for a variety of factors that include recommended changes in sleeping position and environment, clarification of the case definition, and diagnostic coding shifts [19β22]. This downward trend in SIDS reports has also been observed in SIDS reports submitted to VAERS since the early 1990s [7] and has continued during the years of this review from 1997 through 2013. There is considerable evidence that vaccination is not causally associated with SIDS [18, 22, 23], including an Institute of Medicine (IOM) review in 2003 that rejected a causal association between the whole cell pertussisβcontaining vaccine (which is no longer in use in the United States) and SIDS and between exposure to multiple simultaneous vaccines and SIDS [21].”
I realize that the post is getting a bit long, but this is from the CDC:
Anyone who gives or receives a licensed vaccine in the U.S. is encouraged to report any significant health problem that occurs after vaccination. An adverse event can be reported even if it is uncertain or unlikely that the vaccine caused it. Reporting to VAERS helps scientists at CDC and FDA better understand the safety of vaccines
ANYONE CAN REPORT TO VAERS, its encouraged and easy to do so, the report does not need to even include evidence that the illness is linked to vaccine.
December 4, 2018 12:32 pm at 12:32 pm in reply to: The Anti-Vaxxers are Causing a Chillul Hashem #16368962scentsParticipantDooms,
If your research would not have been selective, you would have also noticed that the supreme court has taken the position that states may implement mandatory vaccination laws. It has been ruled that this is constitutional.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
Schools have the right to refuse admission to an unvaccinated student.
Zucht v. KingDecember 4, 2018 12:10 pm at 12:10 pm in reply to: The Anti-Vaxxers are Causing a Chillul Hashem #16368832scentsParticipantDooms,.
“Rav Shmuel shlitah said that Yeshivas/BY may not stop unvaccinated children from attending Yeshiva/BY.
You donβt consider that an anti-vax position?”Nope note at all, this is not an anti-vax position, it just means that the schools must accept them.
Furthermore, he has not said this when there was an outbreak, even if he were to say so, does not mean that he recommends not vaccinating. otherwise, he would have said so.December 4, 2018 12:10 pm at 12:10 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16368812scentsParticipantDooms,
You just keep on repeating yourself, its become a boring conversation.
Without telling people to google, and without just stating assumptions and label them as fact, do you have anything of substance?
December 4, 2018 12:10 pm at 12:10 pm in reply to: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.π¨βπ¬ππ« #16368792scentsParticipantDooms,
“Vaccines are NOT safety tested the same way Medicine is. There are NO PLACEBO Tests comparing Vaxxed to Unvaxxed like MUST be done for all other new medicine by LAW!;”
Really? from where are you taking your facts, you cannot just make up facts then use it as an argument.
If this is your tactic, we will never end as you can just manufacture facts as you see fit.
-
AuthorPosts