practical,

Emotion has no place when it comes to science especially medical science. I hope that in whatever areas of health care you claim to be involved they do not practice based on what they love or because they happen to share some view.

Using authority as part of your argument, especially when the context of the argument is poor, undermines the argument.

I do invite you to take a peek at the otherwise very long thread in the coffee room about this topic, (something about vaccines studies that you might have missed). Some tried very hard to push an agenda against established medical science yet were unable to do so. In fact, they were exposed for being frauds (or maybe simply just posting from sites that are fraudulent).

Dooms,

As DY pointed out, you simply lied here.

I urge anyone that is skeptical about this subject to take a look at that thread, especially the last two pages, dooms was left out to dry. The facts and the data are straightforward and stacked against the radical anti medicine position.

Practical, your posts do not make you seem like someone that is well educated and actually practices medicine.

Bump,

Still waiting for Doomsday to respond.

CTL.

A. I wish hitler would have put people on flights and deported them instead of killing them.

B. Why are you using emotion as a justification for breaking the law?

If that is the case, then why even investigate and publicize the non-findings, since he was anyways not able to charge a sitting president with a crime.

Do prosecutors investigate and disclose their opinions or possibilities that a crime might or might have not occurred when they are not charging anyone with a crime, regardless of the reasoning?

It so seems that there is more going on here than it seems, this is not someone just doing their job, this is someone justifying something that has legal experts scratching their minds.

And with regards to Congress, its politics as usual, the Democrats have already stated in public that a crime has occurred, some have even used criminal terms even without the president being charged with anything let alone being tried.

Which basically means, that the standard applied to our president, is that until he is exonerated (which is not something that prosecutors do) we cannot say for sure a crime has not occurred, therefore he needs to be charged.

Amila,

Your falling victim to partisan politics, this does not mean there was a crime, he clearly stated that he never looked in that direction as he was not tasked on doing so.

To the average person, Trump comes across as an innocent victim that was upset that he is being accused of something that wasnt there. now they are going to go after him for being upset about it and almost taking actions that were obstruction.

It seems as if the Democrats will be preoccupied with items that the average citizen does not care, and hand Trump a victory.

My point was, that Mueller just added some confusion which will just make both parties claim victory.

Son what’s your point?

As of today, those states have not been removed so their votes count..

Silent followers have a tendency to check peoples profile to see if they are blocked..

Iaskern

Can you back up your statement with a decent explanation and examples of Barr lying?

Or your just saying so because it fits a political agenda?

I believe that the redactions wont really change much one way or another.

I have skimmed through it, there is enough material for everyone to claim victory.

There are questionable actions from trump, even those questionable actions have not had any impact on the investigation.

Furthermore, its questionable if the intent was criminal or simply frustrating about being investigated about something that simply didn’t occur (as is known today).

While there is no evidence that a crime occurred or the intent was criminal, there is enough for those that hate trump to claim stuff.

“Do you like grouchy mods”

Can just imagine the mods waking up covered in sweat dreaming of the vaccines being anti chabad and arhuing about the shidduch crisis.

There have been a number of printed and written letters stating that everyone is ‘mechuyiv’ to vaccinate.

These are signed by the leading rabbinim of our generation.

Please provide a written psak that opposes this.

On a side note, when tye leading rabbonim and poskim publicize in writing that not only is there no reason not to vaccinate. But there is a chuyiv, how can one use jewish religion as an exemption, these are the religious leaders, not some lady pushing a stroller in williamsburg.

J,

Observations cannot be debated, they are facts you should not be debating facts.

You asked for data:

CDC/Measle/complications

Some people may suffer from severe complications, such as pneumonia (infection of the lungs) and encephalitis (swelling of the brain). They may need to be hospitalized and could die.

As many as one out of every 20 children with measles gets pneumonia, the most common cause of death from measles in young children.
About one child out of every 1,000 who get measles will develop encephalitis (swelling of the brain) that can lead to convulsions and can leave the child deaf or with intellectual disability.
For every 1,000 children who get measles, one or two will die from it.
Measles may cause pregnant woman to give birth prematurely, or have a low-birth-weight baby.

Long-term Complications

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) is a very rare, but fatal disease of the central nervous system that results from a measles virus infection acquired earlier in life. SSPE generally develops 7 to 10 years after a person has measles, even though the person seems to have fully recovered from the illness. Since measles was eliminated in 2000, SSPE is rarely reported in the United States.

Among people who contracted measles during the resurgence in the United States in 1989 to 1991, 4 to 11 out of every 100,000 were estimated to be at risk for developing SSPE. The risk of developing SSPE may be higher for a person who gets measles before they are two years of age.

CDC/History of Measles

In 1912, measles became a nationally notifiable disease in the United States, requiring U.S. healthcare providers and laboratories to report all diagnosed cases. In the first decade of reporting, an average of 6,000 measles-related deaths were reported each year.

I can easily provide you general observations and studies that are available.

But for the current outbreak, there are no official numbers and I dont think that anyone will provide you with a list of last names of patients that have been transported or admitted.

Getting admitted for the common cold, is rare.

Joseph,

Not sure your point.

The hospitalizations are estimated to be about 20%, Some are transported by ambulance and some are admitted, This does not happen with the common cold.

Your statement is incorrect.

Massive ‘my-side bias’ here. On all sides of the argument.

He won.

Its the torah that teaches us civility.

Society can decide to enforce certain rules it deems important.

Yet the scammer, who usually isnt subject to society’s rules, makes up their own rules and morals to do as they see fit.

Nowdays with social media things are pretty scary.

It doesnt take much for something to spread quickly.

Ye this also means that awareness and educating prople about anti semitism nonsense is also doable. If only it would have been done.

“Nine for the vaccine thread doomed never to die,”

It felt like the CR became infected.

from Wikipedia:

” In 2018, Israel significantly loosened firearms restrictions, allowing all citizens who had undergone combat training as a combat soldier in the army, to apply for a license. This only applies to those who have passed infantry rifle training”

Yet, my point was not that gun laws in Israel are not as strict as in the US, my point was that the net result in Israel seems to be that there are a significant number of civilians carrying firearms which in numerous occasions limited the damage of the shooting attack.

While most are focused on preventing the shooting in the first place, I think there is a component that is not really being looked at, which is the ability to defend yourself from an attack and ability to limit the damage of the attacker.

What if the customer refuses to produce the receipt. What happens at that point?

Obviously, there is no solution that will eliminate gun shooting, and there are different opinions on how to reduce potential gun violence.

However, I believe that there are a few components to this discussion, one would be on a macro level and the other on a micro level.

For instance, having stricter gun laws might or might not have an impact on potential gun violence. Yet we can also have a discussion about what if you were to be caught up in an active shooter situation, what would be the best mechanism for you as an individual that would increase your survival probability and also possibly eliminate the active shooter threat from creating further damage?

What if you or someone near you would be carrying a legal weapon and be trained on how to effectively use it, would that reduce the shooters potential for further damage?

..Or by starting threads in the coffee room?

CTL,

I think that its a really nice of you to give a greater portion of your money than is asked of you.

I am just wondering how something like this can be done. Do they just accept the additional tax/donation and not send you a return check for the overpayment?

There are mental disorders that can cause this, regardless of the reason behind this alleged behavior its very sad.