- This topic has 245 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
Reading PAA’s posts, I often wonder if I’m PAA. He talks exactly like me, except that he cuts-and-pastes full sources.
I haven’t been quoted for a while. Have I become civil? I’ll have to fix that.
haha!!! i was gonna write “PAA I dont know that song” but then I thought I may as well give you something to write in your report card thread! 😀
No 🙂 in what way was that offensive?
You’re making me blush 🙂 (but seeing as this is the report card thread, doesn’t the apostrophe go after the ‘t’ in ‘it’s’ ? ;p)
I’ve never heard of “i’ts” being proper.
“This is actually one of the rare times when it doesn’t.”
HUH.
???
“I hope not from embarrasssment.” Is this also one of the rare times when embarrassment has three ‘s’?
PAA didn’t say that the apostrophe is supposed to be directly after the “i”, he’s just pointing out that this is one of the rare times that it in fact is.
DY – yes I figured it out; bit slow on the uptake, sorry 😉
seeing as this is the report card thread, isn’t the apostrophe go after the ‘t’ in ‘it’s’ ? ;p)
HUH.
???
PAA said that he should have said “isn’t,” not that
Cozimjewish should have.
However, saying “isn’t” would not have answered the question. The question was “Does it not?” The (false) answer given was “It does not.”
Cozimjewish:
Should I assume Yigal Calek’s “Mar’eh Kohen” does not
have the musical characteristics you had requested?
Does anyone remember (did they notice?) when Cozimjewish unilaterally made an addition to the thread by posting a critical comment about one of PAA’s posts (in this thread) and attributing it to herself?
Whether it was intentional or not, I was amused.
Then you should have mentioned him to begin with.
Cozimjewish doesn’t have YouTube access, so you might want
to find an alternate location and post it in her thread.
“That was a joke. Please continue to point out my mistakes.”
Sure thing ;p (just kidding. There’s hardly any of them anyway 🙂 )
“HUH.
???”
(cozimjewish)”
In what way is that accusatory, exasperatory, or making a statement about you (or offensive, for that matter)?
“Thanks for the limud zechut, but if that’s what I meant then I should have said “isn’t” instead of “doesn’t”.”
That just made me more confused.
“Does anyone remember (did they notice?) when Cozimjewish unilaterally made an addition to the thread by posting a critical comment about one of PAA’s posts (in this thread) and attributing it to herself? Whether it was intentional or not, I was amused.”
Thanks 🙂 Actually, I sort of copied it from here:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/your-coffee-room-report-card-comments#post-530173
“You have to listen to Ohad’s version to understand why I recommended it. It’s on youtube”
Taking your memory into consideration, PAA, I am surprised you don’t recall that I can’t access YouTube 😉
I assume he thought “HUH” was in response to his false answer to you.
“isn’t” might have been confusing because it didn’t make sense.
Oops. Sorry, Popa. (I don’t see how that post made any sense, though, so I think you put it to better use, Cozimjewish.)
“I assume he thought “HUH” was in response to his false answer to you.”
It was.
” “isn’t” might have been confusing because it didn’t make sense.”
I officially give up.
“Oops. Sorry, Popa. (I don’t see how that post made any sense, though, so I think you put it to better use, Cozimjewish.)”
Wow – I did better than popa?! If this thread hadn’t been in my favorites already I would add it now just for that compliment :D!
Read my statement again. You misinterpreted it. (Perhaps deliberately?)
If I had a report card thread…
Perhaps misinterpreted, not deliberately.
Randomex has it right – your comment, as a response to cozimjewish, correctly said “doesn’t” rather than the contextually inappropriate “isn’t”.
“The statement “HUH???” connotes that I said something crazy, or non-understandable”
Crazy, no. Non-understandable, maybe. Still not accusatory, exasperatory, or making a statement about you (rather, it is posing a question about something you said, which is different). Incidentally, is exasperatory even a word? (I’ll still use it even if it isn’t, coz I like it 😉 )
“(I hope this helped unconfuse you. If not, let me know and I’ll try again.)”
Don’t bother, I have given up already 😉
“But you’re still welcome to keep this as one of your favorite threads”
You’re hilarious 😀
PAA – do you anatomize EVERY post?! (That was half exasperatory, half amused. No need to quote me, it’s in this thread anyway 🙂 )
Don’t worry, it’s good 🙂 I like the way you anatomize my posts 🙂 (I still hold that it’s anatomizing ;p)
Actually, it was obvious that there was context missing. I assumed that at some point in the past, a statement about MLdA had been made.
No reason was given, however, for a switch to MLkD.
(You assume it to be this thread – fair enough, but
could I have been expected to realize that?)
Likewise, there would appear to be no advantage in being MLkD over MLdA, so I don’t think the term “dubious improvement” applied.
(Thanks for clearing up the matter of the “This has nothing…”
thread’s title – I had wondered about that.)
At any rate, Cozimjewish had a valid complaint, and Popa had an insult. Which do you think I would consider a better post?
Makes up for it? Don’t chap…
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.