- This topic has 34 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 6 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
If Obama was a private citizen, and he applied for a job, would you hire him?
I would think someone who is used to everyone listening to him would have a difficult transition to following directions.
It depends what the job is.
If I was running a criminal organization and the job was to break the law and talk his way out of it, I would definitely hire him.
He can take back his old job as “community activist”.
Is he looking for a job? How would you hire somebody who’s not interested in your job.
Git Meshige I feel bad for you bist takke git meshige to come up with such a question.
I would look at his resume and see if he fits the position.
PBA: When did obama break the law and talk his way out of it?
” When did obama break the law “
Going by the logic in which he was voted in, I wouldn’t bother looking at his resume. I would hire him enthusiastically in order to ‘be part of history!’
🙂 I’m still laughing
OXYMORON: Obama-Resume
PBA: When did obama break the law and talk his way out of it?
Apparently it worked on you.
69 million Americans voted to give him a job.
69 million Americans voted to give him a job.
Yes, but the question at hand is whether someone would hire him to do a job in a situation where the employer would pay him, instead of him paying the employer using the money of the people who didn’t hire him.
See how that’s different?
To not hire him because you don’t agree with his policies is just wrong. That’s a line nobody should ever cross.
Popa, that’s not fair. I can say that about anything or anyone.
“69 million Americans voted to give him a job”
Shows how easily the dumbed down American public has become.
If you need a narcissist pathological liar, he’s your guy.
charliehall
“69 million Americans voted to give him a job.”
Which means that 166 million plus eligible voters did not.
Popa, that’s not fair. I can say that about anything or anyone.
Not really.
This is more like I call Tom Brady a cheater, and rew posts “PBA: When did Brady cheat?”
You can dispute if you think Brady cheated, but you can’t just put on your blank face.
When you compare Obama to Brady, you’re just deflating the issues.
Which means that 166 million plus eligible voters did not.
By that argument, *no* US President is legitimate.
The Wolf
This thing with Brady is so not a big deal but Goodell had to suspend him or he would look soft again, yes he broke a rule but its not equal to using ped’s .
Why is it not equal to peds?
By that argument, *no* US President is legitimate.
The conversation wasn’t arguing against his legitimacy as President.
arack Obama is a normal person. Any person elected morphs into a narcissistic pathological liar.
The conversation wasn’t arguing against his legitimacy as President.
Fine, “legitimacy” was perhaps the wrong word. Perhaps “worthiness” would be better. Either way, my point still stands. If you’re going to condemn/discredit/disparage Obama on that count, then you have to do so for every President.
The Wolf
When you compare Obama to Brady, you’re just deflating the issues.
Like!
Gut Shabbos!
SiDi™
Wolf, it was a counter argument, not an argument.
The legitimacy of Obama was not at issue, as far as I know. It was if he was actually born in the U.S., which is required for a U.S. president. 😉
My comment is a refutation of CharlieHalls assertion that we should hire Obama because 69 Million voted for him. And that is a bogus assertion. Which I amply proved. Aside from the fact that the question was whether we would hire him. Which PBA and Barry very ably responded to.
When did obama break the law and talk his way out of it?
Apparently it worked on you.
When did Bush break the law and talk his way out of it?
Apparently it worked on you.
When did Carter break the law and talk his way out of it?
Apparently it worked on you.
When did Reagan break the law and talk his way out of it?
Apparently it worked on you.
When did Kennedy break the law and talk his way out of it?
Apparently it worked on you.
They all did.
Matan: Didn’t I like already respond to that argument?
No. You compared Obama to Brady. But Brady has been under investigation, while Obama has not.
If I was a film director and he applied for a job as an actor I’d think about it
“69 million Americans voted to give him a job”
But most felt that they had a choice of only two applicants, and further, they had to hire _someone_ by a certain date. So, basically, they were up against a wall and had to scrape the bottom of the barrel.
Now, clearly, that applies to every President. The point is, the fact that the majority of voters may have voted for someone doesn’t mean they’d hire him for their business.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.