Home › Forums › Shidduchim › Who wants to be a Tzadaikes like Rus?
- This topic has 158 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 3 months ago by Mammele.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 14, 2011 6:01 pm at 6:01 pm #1180130☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant
Health,
I don’t know why you think the gemara on 44 is the “main” gemara, which somehow renders the one on 101 obsolete. On 101, the gemara quotes the beraisa (posted above) which gives marrying someone (much) older or younger as an example of an ill-advised marriage. The gemara on 44 asks a question on the mishna which allows multiple yibums (from different brothers) because this would also be ill-advised. The two are in no way contradictory, and, in fact, the Tur (166) gives the former as an example.
June 14, 2011 6:10 pm at 6:10 pm #1180131HealthParticipantca -“who wants to have the responsibility of raising moshiach?”
You always have to look at our forefathers and try to emulate them. You probably won’t get there, but they say if you don’t even try you won’t get anywhere.
June 14, 2011 6:25 pm at 6:25 pm #1180132☕️coffee addictParticipanttrue, true
June 14, 2011 6:35 pm at 6:35 pm #1180133HealthParticipantDY -Go back and look again, but the main Gemorrah explaining it is Mem Daled. The gemorah on Kuf Aleph had a problem with numbers because we have this posuk that if you add it up -it equals 7, but the Rabbonim hold 3. So the gemorrah answers we need it to teach you that you have to give the guy a good Eitzah (advice) (on whom to marry -same age or older or younger), so now that the posuk which R’ Yehudah uses to add 4 more to the Bais Din, the Rabbonim use it for something else, so they don’t have to add 4 more to the Bais Din. So now the Rabbonim could hold 3 on the B.D.
Enough with Talmud 101!
June 14, 2011 7:43 pm at 7:43 pm #1180134☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantEnough with Talmud 101!
Good line.
Regardless, the beraisa, quoted on kuf aleph (sorry) and mem daled says that it is not a good idea to marry someone much older or younger, and the halacha is brought like this in the Tur (the S.A. doesn’t specify what kind of an eitzah, but doesn’t argue on the beraisa, obviously).
June 14, 2011 9:58 pm at 9:58 pm #1180135☕️coffee addictParticipantok veteran I did my research and you’re right
I looked in Eeshei HaTanach on a bunch of people it quotes sofrim 21-9 that says dinah was 6
seichel tov says she was 8.5
and Midrash Lekach Tov says Tzipporah was a young lady b/c the passuk doesn’t say V’Tahar b/c she didn’t look pregnant
June 15, 2011 4:10 am at 4:10 am #1180136HealthParticipantDaas Yochid – IDK; Did you read my post on the previous page? Why in the world would you think this applies to a regular marriage or even regular Yibum? The Gemorrah says quite clearly that it’s going on that case of more than one that needs Yibum.
I completely fail to follow your train of thought. If you look at the Gemorrah over on Mem Daled, you see clear that it’s not a problem only in this case because the Gemorrah says if he is wealthy, he can marry more than one and we don’t tell him anything like -stick with your own age buddy. (Acc. to you why not?) The gemorrah says we only tell him this when there will be conflict (Kettoh). So why do you keep on pretending that this is just like a Chok in Torah Sheb’ksav. You keep insisting that this Eitza has no reason and applies all the time, in every type of marriage. And of course it’s brought down in Tur because this is the Halacha with more than one women to be Meyabim. Even when the Torah says something which is a Chok, Chazal tried to find some sort of reason and here where the Gemorrah says clearly what the reason is, you pretend there isn’t any.
And btw, how did you come across this Gemorrah -did you learn it now or recently, or did you do some Talmudic search on the net looking for something to prove me wrong?!?
June 15, 2011 1:29 pm at 1:29 pm #1180138☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMod: I had a few more minutes now to completely answer his post. Can you please remove the earlier one? Thanks.
Daas Yochid – IDK; Did you read my post on the previous page? Why in the world would you think this applies to a regular marriage or even regular Yibum? The Gemorrah says quite clearly that it’s going on that case of more than one that needs Yibum.
It’s a beraisa. The gemara quoted it to ask a kasha. The beraisa was talking about regular yibum.
I completely fail to follow your train of thought.
Likewise.
the Gemorrah says if he is wealthy, he can marry more than one and we don’t tell him anything like -stick with your own age buddy.
Because it’s an unrelated case; the yevamos are of similar age to him.
The gemorrah says we only tell him this when there will be conflict (Kettoh). So why do you keep on pretending that this is just like a Chok in Torah Sheb’ksav. You keep insisting that this Eitza has no reason and applies all the time, in every type of marriage.
And of course it’s brought down in Tur because this is the Halacha with more than one women to be Meyabim.
The Tur does not say one word about more than one yevama, because the beraisa was not only talking in such a case.
Even when the Torah says something which is a Chok, Chazal tried to find some sort of reason and here where the Gemorrah says clearly what the reason is, you pretend there isn’t any.
I never pretended any such thing. The reason given is ketotah.
And btw, how did you come across this Gemorrah -did you learn it now or recently, or did you do some Talmudic search on the net looking for something to prove me wrong?!?
June 15, 2011 4:00 pm at 4:00 pm #1180139veteranMembercoffee addict-
Thank you and kol hakavod to you. You are a worthy opponent, zein gebentched.
June 17, 2011 4:36 pm at 4:36 pm #1180140HealthParticipantDY -Sorry I didn’t get back sooner – I was busy.
“The Tur does not say one word about more than one yevama, because the beraisa was not only talking in such a case.”
The Tur is talking about the case whatever the Braisa is -so it doesn’t have to specify.
“I completely fail to follow your train of thought.
Likewise.”
I now understand how you are learning, but let us analyze the Gemorah on Mem-Daled and see how your P’shat can’t be P’shat.
You say the Gemorrah asked from the Braisa on the Mishna-
“The gemara quoted it to ask a kasha. The beraisa was talking about regular yibum.”
Ok, so acc. to you what is the Kasha? The Mishna says that a person can marry more than one Yevama and the Braisa says you shouldn’t marry age difference (by one Yevama or more)(And I guess Kettoh means fighting because of age)? This isn’t a kasha because you can just say the Mishna was talking about a case where they were all the same age, so no problem.
The way I’m learning is like this -the Braisa and Mishna are all talking about marrying more than Yevama. So how could the Mishna say you can marry more than one, the Braisa says when you have more than one Yevama you look to get rid of the others by looking for age difference or any difference? With my P’shat there can only be one answer -that the Mishna is talking about a rich man and he can afford to marry a few. You can’t give the simple answer that the Mishna was talking about no age difference because that isn’t the point of the Braisa. The point of the Braisa was – get rid of as many as you can and only marry one (because the Yovom can’t afford it acc. to the Maskonoh).
So now you see why I’m learning in regular marriage or regular Yibum there is no problem marrying age difference. (At least, you don’t have any Rayah from this Gemorrah that there is.) It was only a problem because we needed to help this guy get out from marrying more than one Yevama because he couldn’t afford it.
June 17, 2011 7:29 pm at 7:29 pm #1180141☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI was busy.
I hope with good things. I’m busy now, so I’ll try to respond to yor way of learning the gemara later.
The kasha on mem daled is how can beis din allow an ill advised marriage (multiple wives – assumed in the kasha to be unaffordable) even if there’s a mitzvah of yibum. We find similarly in the beraisa that based on the pasuk of v’dibru, beis din advises (insists) against an ill advised marriage despite the mitzvah (the example the beraisa gave of an ill advised marriage is to someone of a very different age, which will lead to marital discord
Good Shabbos
June 17, 2011 8:19 pm at 8:19 pm #1180142☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOK, I have a couple of unexpected “free” minutes, so I’ll address the way you learned the gemara.
The problem is, you’re reading something into the beraisa which simply isn’t there; the beraisa is referring to regular yibum, and to learn that it’s talking about multiple yevamos, with the objective to eliminate all but one, is pure speculation.
The Tur would also be completely out of context, as I already mentioned, and there’s no reason for him to expect us to understand his case to be that of multiple yevamos when the beraisa makes no hint of that.
Also, according to you, it’s perfectly acceptable to marry someone quite a bit younger, so why would age be a criterion for elimination?
One more thing – why does the beraisa say the issue is kettotah if the issue is finances?
The pshat I mentioned is the simple pshat, and it does not pose any of these difficulties.
June 17, 2011 11:36 pm at 11:36 pm #1180143HealthParticipantDY -“Also, according to you, it’s perfectly acceptable to marry someone quite a bit younger, so why would age be a criterion for elimination?”
They aren’t eliminated; just recommended against only when you have more than one to choose.
“One more thing – why does the beraisa say the issue is kettotah if the issue is finances?”
Kettoh means strife. In this case the strife is financial.
“The pshat I mentioned is the simple pshat, and it does not pose any of these difficulties.
The kasha on mem daled is how can beis din allow an ill advised marriage (multiple wives – assumed in the kasha to be unaffordable) even if there’s a mitzvah of yibum. We find similarly in the beraisa that based on the pasuk of v’dibru, beis din advises (insists) against an ill advised marriage despite the mitzvah (the example the beraisa gave of an ill advised marriage is to someone of a very different age, which will lead to marital discord”
Ok, let’s say you could learn your P’shat that they use the Posuk to tell you that you aren’t allowed to do Yibum with older or younger women. My P’shat fits in so you don’t have to learn your way, but let’s say you want to. Where do you ever see you don’t have to be Mikayim Pru OORevu because of age difference? You want to say the Posuk throws it out of Yibum altogether, fine; but now take it and learn it by regular marriage -impossible. And you can’t say I’ll find someone else -this minute you are being Mevatel Pru OORevu. The same is true by the woman -this minute they aren’t being Mekayim L’sheves Yeetzoroh.
Now you know why Boaz said what Rus did was such a big chessed- marrying an older guy can cause marital strife and even so she wanted him. And in her case, not like nowadays it was Only chessed because e/o wanted to marry her. But in our generation they will sit aroung waiting in their twenties and thirties, not necessarily having s/o who definitely will marry them but as long as they won’t marry s/o older. Maybe the older guys aren’t Tzadikim like Boaz, but the girls aren’t like Rus either were e/o wants them or they would be married by 22!
June 19, 2011 3:24 am at 3:24 am #1180144☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY -“Also, according to you, it’s perfectly acceptable to marry someone quite a bit younger, so why would age be a criterion for elimination?”
They aren’t eliminated; just recommended against only when you have more than one to choose.
That was the context I was referring to. I see at the end of your post that you agree that a large age difference can cause marital strife, so it seems that you agree to this basic point.
“One more thing – why does the beraisa say the issue is kettotah if the issue is finances?”
Kettoh means strife. In this case the strife is financial.
If you mean that finacial strain can lead to marital strife, I accept your point. Even if this was not your intention, I thought of this point over Shabbos (and I saw a Meiri who uses the term ketotah referring to the gemara on mem daled), and I retract this kasha.
“The pshat I mentioned is the simple pshat, and it does not pose any of these difficulties.
The kasha on mem daled is how can beis din allow an ill advised marriage (multiple wives – assumed in the kasha to be unaffordable) even if there’s a mitzvah of yibum. We find similarly in the beraisa that based on the pasuk of v’dibru, beis din advises (insists) against an ill advised marriage despite the mitzvah (the example the beraisa gave of an ill advised marriage is to someone of a very different age, which will lead to marital discord”
Ok, let’s say you could learn your P’shat that they use the Posuk to tell you that you aren’t allowed to do Yibum with older or younger women. My P’shat fits in so you don’t have to learn your way, but let’s say you want to. Where do you ever see you don’t have to be Mikayim Pru OORevu because of age difference? You want to say the Posuk throws it out of Yibum altogether, fine; but now take it and learn it by regular marriage -impossible. And you can’t say I’ll find someone else -this minute you are being Mevatel Pru OORevu. The same is true by the woman -this minute they aren’t being Mekayim L’sheves Yeetzoroh.
First, I will reiterate that your pshat does not fit in. The Meiri I mentioned, as well as the Ritva, both learn that the gemara on mem daled is asking from the beraisa as an analogy, not directly.
Of course he is not patur from p’ru ur’vu, but there’s no chiyuv to marry the first woman you meet even if it’s a horrible shidduch!
Now you know why Boaz said what Rus did was such a big chessed- marrying an older guy can cause marital strife and even so she wanted him. And in her case, not like nowadays it was Only chessed because e/o wanted to marry her.
I’m glad that we can agree, at least, that a large age gap can cause marital strife.
But in our generation they will sit aroung waiting in their twenties and thirties, not necessarily having s/o who definitely will marry them but as long as they won’t marry s/o older. Maybe the older guys aren’t Tzadikim like Boaz, but the girls aren’t like Rus either were e/o wants them or they would be married by 22!
I don’t think it’s fair to compare our generation to Rus and Boaz at all.
It’s also not realistic to expect a girl in her 20’s or 30’s to give up on a normal marriage and agree to marry someone who might be decades older than her.
June 19, 2011 4:44 am at 4:44 am #1180145mddMemberDa’as Yochid, the Gemora is talking about a very serious age difference. Mestama, at the very least — 17-20 years.
June 19, 2011 4:53 am at 4:53 am #1180146☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantmdd,
I assumed Health was as well.
June 19, 2011 5:50 am at 5:50 am #1180147HealthParticipantDY -“The Meiri I mentioned, as well as the Ritva, both learn that the gemara on mem daled is asking from the beraisa as an analogy, not directly.”
Do they both say that the Braisa is talking in the case of 1 Meyavem and one lady or can the Braisa be talking only the case of multiple women?
“Of course he is not patur from p’ru ur’vu, but there’s no chiyuv to marry the first woman you meet even if it’s a horrible shidduch!”
I was talking from the girl’s point of view. The guy usually doesn’t care how young the girl is. But a man might care about how old the woman is, due to the limited time of chidbearing years.
“It’s also not realistic to expect a girl in her 20’s or 30’s to give up on a normal marriage and agree to marry someone who might be decades older than her.”
Ok, so at what point, acc. to you, does she have to settle on an older man before she is considered being Mevatel the Mitzva? 40,45,50? I hold -by 22 she is Oiver because if there was s/o who wanted her -she would have found him in the last few years.
“I don’t think it’s fair to compare our generation to Rus and Boaz at all.”
Of course not, we live in a Hefker Velt. Any Motzay Shem Ra you hear on the boy is automatically true and vice versa. Also, any whim you have gives you an excuse not to get married for decades or forever. Eg. I don’t like the other’s looks (I’m not talking about ugly), too short, too tall, too fat (Again, I’m not talking about extremes) and of course too old (Again, I’m not talking about a 95 y.o. man with a 25 y.o. woman, like you hear on the news). I could go on & on with the list of things, but I think e/o gets my gist. What you decided is not worthy of marrying consistent with the Torah’s view?
June 19, 2011 12:29 pm at 12:29 pm #1180148☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDo they both say that the Braisa is talking in the case of 1 Meyavem and one lady or can the Braisa be talking only the case of multiple women?
They don’t specifically say; it can likely be talking about either case. (The beraisa happens to use loshon yochid).
The guy usually doesn’t care how young the girl is.
He should. Although he may need to be makpid on her ability to have children, why should he get involved in a marriage which can easily be filled with ketotah?
Ok, so at what point, acc. to you, does she have to settle on an older man before she is considered being Mevatel the Mitzva? 40,45,50?
Good question. I guess there’s some type of sliding scale, with a larger age discrepancy as she gets older (in which case a larger separation in years may not indicate as large a discrepancy in maturity as when she was younger).
I hold -by 22 she is Oiver because if there was s/o who wanted her -she would have found him in the last few years.
I think that’s way over the top.
June 19, 2011 12:49 pm at 12:49 pm #1180149shlishiMemberDY –
What about those girls who are left without any shidduch due to the age gap making there not enough grooms for every girl? (I know they are working on solutions for the age gap, but even those solutions acknowledge even if it helps, until then the problem will persist.) Shouldn’t they marry a much older (or even previously married) man rather than stay single their entire lives, as the age gap will make some girls be?
June 19, 2011 7:06 pm at 7:06 pm #1180150☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantshlishi,
There are no specific girls left without a shidduch, so the girls don’t look at it as if they’re stranded on a desert island with just one, older, man.
Whether or not a girl should take her “poor” odds into consideration is a personal decision, but there are other things to be compromised before age.
You mention divorcees, but you lump it together with age discrepancy. I wouldn’t.
I also think 22 (as mentioned by a different poster) is a ridiculously low age to be so desperate.
June 19, 2011 7:50 pm at 7:50 pm #1180151shlishiMemberDY,
Whether they look at it like that or not, at the end of the day some girls won’t have any groom or husband. There will be no more guys left for them. And while your point of the order of what to compromise first is an interesting (and worthwhile) one, the age gap means that the sad fact is some girls no matter what won’t be able to get married (when the men run out), no matter if they even compromise everything.
So, yes, 22 is a bit early, and perhaps the more appropriate age is say 26-27 before a dose of reality needs to set it for the girls, but if we understand the age gap correctly, and if they don’t want to be left stranded to a life of being single, some of them will need to compromise both on the age issue and on the previously married issue. Both compromises will add more men to the pool for the girls who are stranded after the young guys are married.
June 20, 2011 12:00 am at 12:00 am #1180152ObaminatorMemberIf a guy and girl want to get married, it’s no one else’s business that he’s much older than her. No one’s forcing anyone to marry anyone else.
June 20, 2011 7:27 am at 7:27 am #1180153HealthParticipantDY -“He should. Although he may need to be makpid on her ability to have children, why should he get involved in a marriage which can easily be filled with ketotah?”
Well I’m talking about someone who doesn’t have any prospects right now and maybe women his own age can’t have kids. Why shouldn’t he be able to marry a much younger person even if there is a possibilty of Ketotoh?
“Good question. I guess there’s some type of sliding scale, with a larger age discrepancy as she gets older (in which case a larger separation in years may not indicate as large a discrepancy in maturity as when she was younger).”
When you write your S’A, I’ll take your opinion into consideration.
“I think that’s way over the top.”
Actually, I think my opinion is very Kulidik. The Gemorrah & S’A imply you would be Oiver right away after Bagress!
“You mention divorcees, but you lump it together with age discrepancy. I wouldn’t.
I also think 22 (as mentioned by a different poster) is a ridiculously low age to be so desperate.”
You seem to imply that your basing your opinion on what’s PC. The S’A is very specific about what a women can decline as a husband, eg. Rayach Rah, etc. No where does it mention divorced as an excuse. And age difference is an excuse only if it’s extreme, eg. Zakain to Yaldah. Like I posted before, Chazal say if your daughter has reached Bagress -Yelech V’yeesaw. This implies hurry up -it’s already late. I know that nowadays girls start around 18 to look to get married- maybe you can be Melamed Zecus that they aren’t ready yet for marriage beforehand-so maybe they aren’t Oiver anything yet. I still said give them 4 more years to be picky before they are Oiver not getting married. But you argued and said -“22 is a ridiculously low age to be so desperate”. I agree with that statement, but that isn’t my issue. My issue is at what point are you being Oiver -not being married. Women and Men have a Chiyuv to be married and you can’t keep pushing it off, year after year, because of your whims, such as age difference. If all that is being offered is something the S’A says you don’t have to marry, so maybe then you are Putter until you get something normal. But if in the eyes of the S’A the guy isn’t a problem, just it’s not PC, eg. age difference, then I can’t possibly see a Heter of why that person isn’t married!
June 20, 2011 7:07 pm at 7:07 pm #1180154☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI know that nowadays girls start around 18 to look to get married- maybe you can be Melamed Zecus that they aren’t ready yet for marriage beforehand-so maybe they aren’t Oiver anything yet.
Do many singles abrogate their chiyuv to get married because they’re too picky? I think so, but I wouldn’t push them into what would likely be a bad marriage.
I know of an older single girl who on several occasions was close to getting engaged. She had reservations, and spoke, each time, to an adam gadol. She was not told to simply get married because she has a chiyuv! If she had a legitimate concern, the rov she spoke to told her not to marry him!
June 20, 2011 9:05 pm at 9:05 pm #1180155shlishiMemberDY: sh’tikah k’hoda’ah. I presume you’ve accepted my points how this issue interacts with the age gap.
June 20, 2011 10:58 pm at 10:58 pm #1180156☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantshlishi,
My viewpoint was already expressed earlier. To summarize: No specific girl is certain to not have a close-in-age shidduch, so whether the odds are against her or not, few girls will compromise on an important issue.
June 20, 2011 11:07 pm at 11:07 pm #1180157shlishiMemberMy follow-up comment, which you haven’t disputed, was that at a certain more advanced age (I guesstimated 26-27) the girls pool of available bochorim is considerable shrunk and she is at that point at risk of being left unmarried for life (per the age gap issue.) So at that age, girls will have to compromise on important issues.
And taking your viewpoint to its logical conclusion…
“No specific girl is certain to not have a close-in-age shidduch, so whether the odds are against her or not, few girls will compromise on an important issue.”
…you should likewise be arguing against NASI’s close-in-age (i.e. one or two years apart) shidduchim since, as you said, no specific girl is certain to be left out.
June 20, 2011 11:13 pm at 11:13 pm #1180158☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI am just being realistic; a 27 year old girl will most likely not be willing to marry a 45 year old man as long as she holds out some hope that she can still marry someone younger.
Don’t confuse this with NASI, which is directed at the societal issue, not an individual girl.
June 21, 2011 3:48 am at 3:48 am #1180159HealthParticipantDY – “This statement of yours answers the others. If someone is not ready to get married, why should that pater them? For the simple reason that the marriage will likely not work out!”
You misunderstood my point. I was being Melaned Zecus on why almost e/o waits till 18 years of age; I wasn’t saying it’s clear from the S’A you can. After 18, I felt you have to give them some time to look for what they put on their list, but this is my thinking -who said the S’A would agree with me.
One thing has nothing to do with the other. Being too immature for marriage isn’t the same thing as I don’t want s/o 20 years older.
“Until then, the rabbonim obviously don’t feel that the chiyuv to get married forces one to get involved in an ill advised marriage (and obviously feel that it’s consistent with S.A.)”
This statement is totally farfetched. No where does the S’A even come close to saying this. Like I previously posted the S’A is very specific what type of potentional husband you can deny yourself from marrying. Sorry, an ill advised marriage isn’t one of them (age gap). As a matter of fact, the S’A uses a totally different reason for Zakain and Yalda, the reason is because of Zenus. If the S’A agreed with you about ill advised marriage, why pick on Zakain and Yalda, any age gap like a 20 y.o. to a 40 y.o. would suffice? And most importantly, why come up with a new reason of Zenus, just quote the Braisa in Yevamos that says age gap can cause Ketotoh. So it’s obvious the S’A didn’t hold your Putter because the marriage is ill advised.
“I think so, but I wouldn’t push them into what would likely be a bad marriage.”
You aren’t, but the Torah is pushing them into an ill advised marriage that might end up bad.
“I know of an older single girl who on several occasions was close to getting engaged. She had reservations, and spoke, each time, to an adam gadol. She was not told to simply get married because she has a chiyuv! If she had a legitimate concern, the rov she spoke to told her not to marry him!”
I don’t even know why you brought this story -I’ve posted many times that the S’A specifically lists a few different reasons why a woman can deny a potentional suitor. Perhaps this guy had one of those problems. But, sorry to inform you, age gap isn’t one of them!
June 21, 2011 4:14 am at 4:14 am #1180160☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHealth,
My comparison between a young girl getting married and a large age differential is quite valid, as is the story I mentioned. I’m making the point that rabbonim, who pasken everything according to S.A., will not advise one to enter into an ill advised marriage, despite p’ru ur’vu and lasheves.
If based on individual personalities, a particular 40 year old man is suitable for a 20 year old woman, I don’t see anything wrong with them getting married. But that would be highly unusual, since they’re from a different generation.
Standard advice from various gedolim is not to marry someone more than ten years apart (although I imagine that it expands a bit as they get older).
June 21, 2011 5:09 am at 5:09 am #1180161HealthParticipantDY – “My comparison between a young girl getting married and a large age differential is quite valid, as is the story I mentioned. I’m making the point that rabbonim, who pasken everything according to S.A., will not advise one to enter into an ill advised marriage, despite p’ru ur’vu and lasheves.
Standard advice from various gedolim is not to marry someone more than ten years apart (although I imagine that it expands a bit as they get older).”
It’s only valid acc. to those Rabbis. If what you are saying is true, the question is on these Rabbonim why they aren’t Paskining like the S’A. Either, the guy is one like a Moochach Schin and she isn’t required to marry him or they feel there is another well suited suitor waiting in the wings for her to marry. But if she doesn’t have anything lined up, I don’t see how she isn’t being Oiver the Issur of not being married acc. to the S’A! After a short period of time of looking to get married you have to throw out your whim list. You don’t have the luxury of pushing it off year after year, unless you hold like the Bair Hatev, who says women aren’t Mechuyav to get married. But, he is like your SN – a Daas Yochid!
June 21, 2011 2:03 pm at 2:03 pm #1180162hanibParticipantbut the girls aren’t like Rus either were e/o wants them or they would be married by 22!
EXCUSE ME?!?!?
i didn’t read everything; i don’t have time right now, so maybe i’m taking this out of context – if i am, i’m sorry.
but, what are you talking about???? so happens that i dated almost 80 guys before i got married (most i should have never gone out with – my parents and i didn’t know how to do proper research in those days) and only 3 of those who i was willing to date again, said no to me, and out of that 3, 2 later wanted to go out with me a few years later. the 1 who didn’t want to go out again was going into business, and i stupidly (but honestly) said, “why would someone want to go into business – from what i understand, most people are dishonest in business”. understandably, he didn’t want to go out again.
i know many people who got married after 22 and married the person who was just right for them. i do know people who married someone 10 years older, some of the girls were 20 and some were 30, but in general, most people prefer to marry someone closer to their age – they have more in common and can understand each other better.
also, a woman, from my understanding, does NOT have a chiyuv to get married. if anything, it would solve more problems if guys would be willing to date girls a year or 2 older than them than if girls would marry a guy 10 years older. (i do know many girls who were older who did marry guys who were a bit younger than they were).
health, be reasonable. the girls also want to be happy and to find the things that they are looking for. just because they are older than 22 when they get married does not mean that they will not be able to have a nice-size family and find their equal in a husband.
if this has nothing to do with what you were saying, then just disregard this.
June 21, 2011 9:43 pm at 9:43 pm #1180163HealthParticipantBina – Why would you comment on my post, if you didn’t read the whole topic? Did you ever hear something called Shiva Devorim B’golem? I was discussing at what point is a woman Oiver the Issur of not being married. I wanted to say at least not until 22.
“also, a woman, from my understanding, does NOT have a chiyuv to get married.”
This is totally not true, even though I brought above one Shitta who holds this way. She doesn’t have the Mitzva of Pru OORevu, but there are two other possible reasons of why she has to get married. Btw, where did you hear this -from your husband, your friends or did you learn this in school?
“if anything, it would solve more problems if guys would be willing to date girls a year or 2 older than them than if girls would marry a guy 10 years older. (i do know many girls who were older who did marry guys who were a bit younger than they were).”
My point was never to solve the Shidduch crisis, but to discuss options in order for people not to Be Oiver the Issur of not being married!
” the girls also want to be happy and to find the things that they are looking for. just because they are older than 22 when they get married does not mean that they will not be able to have a nice-size family and find their equal in a husband.”
I hope everybody is happy in their marriage. But if a girl is 22 or older and not like you that had 80 guys lined up ready to go out, why not broaden their horizons a little bit? As a matter of fact, I feel that they have a Chiyuv to do this because why Al Pi Torah do they have the excuse why they aren’t married now. If they answer because nothing is Tzugepassed, well did they try older men? Saying a person 20 or 30 years older is not Tzugepassed because of their age doesn’t apply acc. to the S’A.
Also, even younger men, why are they saying no because it’s not Tzugepassed, is it because of something they dreamt up and put on some list or is it because of a reason the S’A says you can say no? It’s not a Hefker Velt, after awhile of looking for what’s on your list, you have to settle. And I don’t agree that the girl has to be 40 -50 y.o. before she has to do this. I believe the Torah requires this quite soon after the time to get married, which btw is not 18, but around 12 -12 1/2. Ok, maybe you can push it off till 18 in our generation because of maturity, but you can’t keep pushing it off and off, year after year!
Also, who decided that they will be more happy if they wait around 20 years and then settle, then settling at a younger age? Not e/o is like you and gets married in their 20’s and it’s putting your head in the sand to say to e/o – No, wait – I/you can do better. I know women who are now in the 40’s or 50’s and aren’t married. Some of these girls were top girls but why aren’t they married now?!?! If ch’vs, they never get married, what are they going to answer in Shomayim? What if the parents/friends told them not to take anything and they shouldn’t settle, what are these people going to answer in Shomayim -why they prevented so and so from getting married?
June 21, 2011 9:46 pm at 9:46 pm #1180164HealthParticipantTo all:
As a side note, I read in the news that a Goy who is 51 just got married to a 16 y.o. girl. And Goyim have no Chiyuv to get married!
June 22, 2011 2:36 am at 2:36 am #1180165hanibParticipantBtw, where did you hear this -from your husband, your friends or did you learn this in school?
okay. maybe i deserve this sarcastic comment – i didn’t learn it in a gemara. a 40 year old woman i know had asked a shaila (of some rav, i don’t know whom). anyways, i’ve always learned that it’s the guy who is supposed to look for the wife, as it’s not the way of the world for women to go pursuing men.
anyways, i did not have 80 guys lined up at one time – i was just like all the other posters here.
of course, both men and women should periodically re-evaluate what they are looking for and decide which areas may or may not be so important to them.
nowadays, when every few years is practically a new generation, a 15 year age gap is no small deal. No matter what age, most women i know are looking for companionship, that they feel comfortable with.
although many girls are desperate to get married, that doesn’t mean that they are desperate – they do want to be happily married. many would rather marry a previously divorced guy, someone from a different background than they previously were looking for, etc. before considering a huge age-gap.
June 22, 2011 2:41 am at 2:41 am #1180166hanibParticipanthealth – why must a read every post before i decide to post? true, i may write something that has nothing to do with anything, so i’d look like a fool – but where did you hear that it’s forbidden to do so? from a friend? did you learn this in school? 😉
June 22, 2011 2:58 am at 2:58 am #1180167Divorced_GuyMemberI am a Divorced Guy in his early 40’s and I am constantly set-up (by Shadchanim) with women 8-10 years younger than me. I will tell you that 19 out of 20 women in their early 30’s will not go out with me because of an 8 (or more) year age-gap. In my experience decisions about age-gap are almost never affected by how many guys are or aren’t available. Women are just not comfortable with the age-gap and they would prefer to continue to wait for a guy with a gap of less than 8 years. In my experience every single shidduch that I accepted with a closer age-gap, the girl agreed to go out with me. So the logical conclusion is that the age-gap is HUGE for Bais Yaakov girls. Someone posted about a non-jew. In those situations people meet and date without thinking about marriage necessarily so age gaps can proceed naturally. Large age-gaps are much, much more common in the non-jewish world. I know of many of them through work. They develop naturally. In the shidduch system, however, age is one of the most important factors.
June 22, 2011 3:55 am at 3:55 am #1180168☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI read in the news that a Goy who is 51 just got married to a 16 y.o. girl.
There’s a reason it was in the news. ?
June 22, 2011 4:14 am at 4:14 am #1180169☕️coffee addictParticipantI read in the news that a Goy who is 51 just got married to a 16 y.o. girl.
there are people called sugar daddies for a reason (a 20 year old girl marrying an 80 year old guy)
June 22, 2011 4:16 am at 4:16 am #1180170☕️coffee addictParticipantoh and to further prove my point he’s an actor
June 22, 2011 3:21 pm at 3:21 pm #1180171HealthParticipantBina – “a 15 year age gap is no small deal. No matter what age, most women i know are looking for companionship, that they feel comfortable with.
although many girls are desperate to get married, that doesn’t mean that they are desperate – they do want to be happily married. many would rather marry a previously divorced guy, someone from a different background than they previously were looking for, etc. before considering a huge age-gap.”
I don’t per se disagree with these comments, but I feel for example a 25 y.o. sitting around not getting Red anything, should consider a man 20 years older. As matter of fact, I believe this woman is being Oiver an Issur. Why? Because what is her excuse for not being married right now? “No one Red me anything.” Well what about telling the Shadchan I’m willing to take an older man, even many years older? “Well, I don’t want to, it’s not Tzugepassed.” I’m sorry to say, acc. to the S’A, this isn’t considered an excuse Al Pi Halacha!
June 22, 2011 3:26 pm at 3:26 pm #1180172HealthParticipantBina – “but where did you hear that it’s forbidden to do so? from a friend? did you learn this in school? ;)”
Oh, I never said – “it’s forbidden to do so”. Just wondering, you admit you look like a fool, why do you want to look like a fool?
Do you feel because you’re anon.? Ya never know, one day s/o here might know who you really are, would you want them to think you’re a fool?!?!
June 22, 2011 3:29 pm at 3:29 pm #1180173HealthParticipantDivorced_Guy – Consider yourself lucky, at least not e/o tells you No!
June 22, 2011 3:36 pm at 3:36 pm #1180174HealthParticipantCoffe addict – “there are people called sugar daddies for a reason (a 20 year old girl marrying an 80 year old guy)”
Sorry to inform you, but that isn’t the definition of a “Sugar Daddy”. A “Sugar Daddy” is s/o who pays a woman to be seen with him in public because he doesn’t have anyone else who he can go out with. They can be the same age or there can be a huge age gap.
The case I saw in the papers, is were they have mutual feelings towards each other and mutually agreed to get married.
June 22, 2011 4:24 pm at 4:24 pm #1180175Avram in MDParticipantTo all:
As a side note, I read in the news that a Goy who is 51 just got married to a 16 y.o. girl. And Goyim have no Chiyuv to get married!
And we want to base our decisions on what the goyim do why?
June 22, 2011 4:33 pm at 4:33 pm #1180176☕️coffee addictParticipantThe case I saw in the papers, is were they have mutual feelings towards each other and mutually agreed to get married.
an actor and a model having mutual feelings for each other, it just doesn’t strike me to be that way, and it seems like the reason they got married is because she looks good and he has money which I still think is the definition of a sugar daddy
June 22, 2011 4:34 pm at 4:34 pm #1180177☕️coffee addictParticipantlook up the wiki definition of sugar daddy
June 22, 2011 5:00 pm at 5:00 pm #1180178cokeMemberas far as I know the only time i heard sugar daddy is when i went for a mani. its a very popular color…..does that have anything to do with this.
June 22, 2011 5:09 pm at 5:09 pm #1180179☕️coffee addictParticipantyes it does.
June 22, 2011 5:10 pm at 5:10 pm #1180180HealthParticipantCA – “an actor and a model having mutual feelings for each other, it just doesn’t strike me to be that way, and it seems like the reason they got married is because she looks good and he has money which I still think is the definition of a sugar daddy”
This is your misinformation. She is a country singer, not just a “model”. She doesn’t need his money!
“look up the wiki definition of sugar daddy”
I actually did and the definition is like me. Under something called “Sugar Daddy” slang -they have your definition. Which e/o knows that wiki -whatever, is nothing but anyone who decides to post. It doesn’t really have much value. It could be true or false. Their definition of anything doesn’t have to be accurate. And at the most your definition is slang. Slang is never the real definition. Here is what the Merriam -Webster’s dictionary defines “Sugar Daddy”:
“sugar daddy
noun
Definition of SUGAR DADDY
1: a well-to-do usually older man who supports or spends lavishly on a mistress, girlfriend, or boyfriend
2: a generous benefactor of a cause or undertaking”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.