- This topic has 22 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 4 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
Just $49 a tie! Kollels are apparently not what they were when I was a kid.
Or maybe ties aren’t.
Or maybe budgets aren’t.
Or, as R’ Levi Yitzchak would have us look at it, even guys who are makpid on designer ties are in kollel!
DaasYochid: 🙂 Love your reply!
it is not clear to me that Versace ties , which feature a face of Medusa, (which also includes a full face of the sun sun)may be worn. Certainly I’m not paskening, but it may be a haklachic issue issue worth inquiring about.
Why wear a tie at all? Save your tie money and buy seforim instead, or buy your wife a dress. Moshe Rabbeinu didn’t wear a tie, you know.
Of course Moshe Rabbeinu didn’t wear a tie. He was Chassidish.
Moshe Rabbeinu wasn’t on a kollel budget. For that matter Moshe Rabbeinu wasn’t in kollel either.
He was what we would call Sephardi.
Actually, Moshe Rabeinu was a Sefardi. Had he been Ashkenazi, his name would have been Rabinowitz.
Patur Aval Assur – of course Moshe Rabeinu was in full-time learning. He just had a very wealthy Father supporting him.
“Patur Aval Assur – of course Moshe Rabeinu was in full-time learning. He just had a very wealthy Father supporting him.”
????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ???? ?? ????
??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ??? ?? ???
I have the same wealthy Father that Moshe had, yet I am not in Kollel. (By the way I assume you used “full-time learning interchangeably with “kollel” but they are not necessarily the same thing.)
VM is right. The only good wealthy father is a edited wealthy father.
To paraphrase the old joke: How do you know Moshe Rabbeinu wore a tie? Because it says “vayispalel moshe,” and do you seriously think Moshe would daven without a tie?
To paraphrase the old joke: How do you know Moshe Rabbeinu wore a tie? Because it says “vayispalel moshe,” and do you seriously think Moshe would daven without a tie?
Also says ?????. Probably difference is that no saf when he didn’t wear a tie.
And it also says ???????? ?????? ?????????? ?????????????????? and the Gemara (Berachos 6b) says ???? ????? ??? ???? which may explain the continuation of the pasuk – ????????? ???????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ????????????? ???????????????? ??????????? – the Pelishti thought Dovid was Chayev Misa for praying to him.
lol
And the Gemara in Sotah 39a says ??? ????? ??? ????? which according to the transitive axiom would mean that ???? = ?????. Maybe this is a limud zechus for people who don’t daven.
And ????? ?????? so at the very least, he gets credit for ?????.
And ????? is ???? ???? which is why people don’t daven in ??? ???.
dafbiyun wrote:
it is not clear to me that Versace ties , which feature a face of Medusa, (which also includes a full face of the sun sun[sic])may be worn.
Medusa is not an avoda zarah – she is a mythological monster. No one ever worshipped her (AFAIK).
As for the sun, do designs on cloth count for avoda zara? Are all images of things which are or were avoda zara still a problem?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.