Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › The Joseph Thread
- This topic has 158 replies, 56 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by Health.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 13, 2011 5:12 pm at 5:12 pm #734462Mother in IsraelMember
Here ya go. I knew I saw it somewhere.
January 13, 2011 5:25 pm at 5:25 pm #734463Avram in MDParticipantMother in Israel,
I read his statement like this:
NO real-brisker… is not him. A double negative implying that any poster named real-brisker on this site is him 🙂
January 13, 2011 5:39 pm at 5:39 pm #734464real-briskerMemberI dont know what they think, but i know who I am, and I am not joseph.
January 13, 2011 5:40 pm at 5:40 pm #734465real-briskerMemberavarm in md, nice twist
January 13, 2011 5:51 pm at 5:51 pm #734466popa_bar_abbaParticipantpopa_bar_abba -Hey Popa, you didn’t include WIY. Does this mean WIY is someone else?
This has nothing to do with me. I don’t know who anyone is.
I only posted the ones who the mods have identified.
haqued
Member
David Kerzner
Huh?
January 13, 2011 6:00 pm at 6:00 pm #734467WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, didnt she use to? I remember that screename from somewhere.
I’ve been mentioning her on my blog for the past five years, and she does occasionally comment there.
The Wolf
January 13, 2011 6:02 pm at 6:02 pm #734468WolfishMusingsParticipantI’ll address Joseph:
Bravo! Well said (much better than I could have put it).
The Wolf
January 13, 2011 6:04 pm at 6:04 pm #734469I can only tryMemberoomis1105-
If one’s “cover is blown,” do you really think that that person’s posting style would not be easily recognizable in another persona?
It depends on:
1) How prolific a poster they are.
2) How distinct their style is.
3) How distinct their interests are.
For example, I don’t think my style is at all distinct, but my interests quite likely are.
If I wanted a “fresh start”, I’d keep off of the riddle, techie and do-it-yourself threads. (Of course, that would somewhat squelch my reason for being here.)
Several years ago when the book “Primary Colors” written by “Anonymous” was issues, there was quite a bit of speculation as to who the author was. Several possible suspects were named, among them writer Joe Klien.
Klein denied it.
A computer program written specifically to identify writing styles positively identified Klien.
Eventualy, Klein admitted that he was the author.
January 13, 2011 7:20 pm at 7:20 pm #734470JotharMemberI personally am concerned for Joseph.
January 13, 2011 7:47 pm at 7:47 pm #734471Avram in MDParticipantWe’ve tried to mark each known Joseph for your convenience.
I don’t know why, but that line really cracks me up.
Mods, sorry if my editing came off on your end as multiple submissions. If this try (to bold the quotation) doesn’t work, I’ll give it up!
January 13, 2011 9:19 pm at 9:19 pm #734472eclipseMemberSender–the bris or Sybil?
January 13, 2011 9:49 pm at 9:49 pm #734473smartcookieMemberJothar
Member
I personally am concerned for Joseph.
Me too. He must have big problems if he’s posting like this.
January 13, 2011 10:10 pm at 10:10 pm #734474SJSinNYCMemberIs Joseph Jewish Philosopher?
January 14, 2011 3:16 am at 3:16 am #734475yossi z.MemberWow this is a shock. And my writing style (to my chagrin) has changed in my absence (from not being here for so long apparently the way I write has been allowed to change or maybe I changed) though I don’t feel that my interests have.
ICOT-based on my statement I would like to put forth that if a person changes (which I hope joseph will for the better) they can legitimately come back without being recognized for who they were
January 14, 2011 3:20 am at 3:20 am #734476Sender AvMemberI know I just made a post referencing Joseph, but maybe I should not have. I was just thinking, could our discussion be considered cyber bullying? If he is “troubled” and that is the reason he does this, could what we are doing hurt him?
January 14, 2011 3:48 am at 3:48 am #734477smartcookieMemberSender Av- I don’t think anyone is being bullied here.
January 14, 2011 5:24 am at 5:24 am #734478eclipseMembersender–I agree.No one is that impermeable.
January 14, 2011 5:34 am at 5:34 am #734479I can only tryMemberyossi z.–
Welcome back.
Interesting point re: changing styles.
I have notices a poster or two whose style has changed (mostly matured somewhat), but that’s probably younger people i.e. late teens, early-mid twenties who are gaining new perspectives.
Once you reach a certain age (say, mine)- …well, you know the expression about old dog, new tricks.
Joseph–
The requests to drop the multi-SN behavior aren’t intended to be mean spirited.
Please consider them.
January 14, 2011 5:54 am at 5:54 am #734480GuardmytongueMemberMaybe Joseph is a dibbuk living in a motherboard. Or the yetzer horah testing our patience and dibbur. Just a thought.
Yes, I am joking.
January 14, 2011 6:21 am at 6:21 am #734481amichaiParticipantmods – I think it’s time for the topic to be closed. enough said.
I don’t.
January 14, 2011 8:20 am at 8:20 am #734482Shticky GuyParticipant‘most likley Wolf and Eees considering they are married’
Eeees, to the best of my knowledge, does not browse or post in the CR.
The Wolf
Wolf, didnt she use to? I remember that screename from somewhere.
I’ve been mentioning her on my blog for the past five years, and she does occasionally comment there.
The Wolf
WOLF – Instead of discussing whether ‘Eeees’ (whoever that may be) does or doesnt browse or post, lets 1st discuss if YOU exist or not.
According to the “Wolfishmusings=Kapusta” thread you may not exist, depending on whether it is Wolfishmusings who exists or Kapusta. Or perhaps neither of you!
So popa_bar_abba, as in your OP, maybe list also all the usernames for Wolf and Kapusta so that we can decide!
PS What does Kapusta mean anyway?
January 14, 2011 3:00 pm at 3:00 pm #734483popa_bar_abbaParticipantI am not aware of any other usernames for Wolfish and Kapusta. I only know what the mods have posted.
If you’d like to look through their posting history:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/kapusta
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/wolfishmusings
And, just so people don’t think I’m hiding anything:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/popa_bar_abba
January 14, 2011 3:32 pm at 3:32 pm #734484yossi z.MemberThe word kapusta means cabbage (ask her why she chose that SN or you can find the thread yourself which goes through the screen names)
January 14, 2011 3:42 pm at 3:42 pm #734485Sender AvMemberKapusta is a woman?
January 14, 2011 3:48 pm at 3:48 pm #734486WolfishMusingsParticipantShticky Guy,
You completely lost me with that post. Can you please simplify your question?
Thanks,
The Wolf
January 14, 2011 3:50 pm at 3:50 pm #734487Jack DanielsMemberdefinitely,she goes by queen kapusta
January 14, 2011 4:08 pm at 4:08 pm #734488apushatayidParticipantI think Tom Brady is also Joseph. As is Danny Woodhead, Jay Cutler and perhaps even Mike Vick. The NFL should really look into it.
January 14, 2011 4:25 pm at 4:25 pm #734489Jack DanielsMemberhey don’t forget the manning brothers, he’s both of ’em don’t you know thats why they can’t play each other in the superbowl
January 14, 2011 4:32 pm at 4:32 pm #734490Avram in MDParticipantI was just thinking, could our discussion be considered cyber bullying? If he is “troubled” and that is the reason he does this, could what we are doing hurt him?
I definitely agree that we should not insult Joseph, and we probably shouldn’t openly speculate on his (or her, or their) motives, but it is not cyber bullying to point out when someone is carpet bombing a forum through multiple usernames, and to publish the offending usernames. Ideally it shouldn’t be allowed at all, but it seems that Joseph has a bit of computer knowledge which makes the deception harder to track. Furthermore, the various Joseph aliases have themselves engaged in cyber bullying in this forum, which can be very hurtful to the target if they feel “ganged up on.”
January 14, 2011 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm #734491wanderingchanaParticipantand Ted Williams. Both of them.
January 14, 2011 5:46 pm at 5:46 pm #734492NonsenseMember<<Bombshell!>>
The RuffRuff you’re all refering to is NOT the Joseph you’re all after. It’s a gilgul of Haleivi which was also erroneously abruptly blocked! I know him PERSONALLY.
I don’t know how you got the mixed.
January 17, 2011 9:20 pm at 9:20 pm #734495Mother in IsraelMemberI just saw that gabboim gets added to the list.
January 17, 2011 10:02 pm at 10:02 pm #734496NonsenseMemberIs there a process for someone to unJoseph himself?
January 17, 2011 10:39 pm at 10:39 pm #734497kapustaParticipantSorry to disappoint everyone, I’m not The Wolf or any of his relatives, nor am I Joseph or any of his SN’s/relatives.
(at least not one that I’m aware of)
Oh, and I’m female for anyone who thought otherwise.
Jack Daniels, how long have you been around to know about the queenkapusta thing? That was a looooong time ago.
January 17, 2011 10:57 pm at 10:57 pm #734498Prince CharmingMemberI think it’s time for both sides to get over their mutual obsession
January 17, 2011 11:59 pm at 11:59 pm #734499Sender AvMemberAvraham , good point. Kapusta, I have not been here that long (I have been reading a while) and have not been able to tell that you were a female from your posts yet. I dont know why I associate the name Kapusta with a male. Maybe it was the * *s?
January 18, 2011 12:06 am at 12:06 am #734500Sender AvMemberThis is starting to remind me of Arthur Millers “The Crucible” Witch…witch. Anyway I was just going to say this is getting kind of ridiculous…until I saw the “eating dairy out” thread. That was clearly a made-up situation. May I suggest ignoring such obvious posts that are made by (you know who(s)) or closing them right away?
January 18, 2011 4:15 am at 4:15 am #734502Sender AvMemberJosh, I was thinking the same thing. I think that Joseph is a moderator. Mods, what do you think(admit)?
Incorrect
January 18, 2011 4:31 am at 4:31 am #734504Sender AvMemberJosh, are you Joseph? You seem to be placing blame on the mods. It crossed my mind too, but it was just a fleeting thought. I think Joe knows a little too much about Yiddishkiet concepts not to be a yid, though I might be wrong. Could be a woman’s lib activist (as you suggest it could be a woman) or a Yeshiva punk. And I apologize to the mods, its just that you let a lot of Joseph Junk go through.
January 18, 2011 4:31 am at 4:31 am #734505bombmaniacParticipantwhy must you feed the trolls…
January 18, 2011 5:12 am at 5:12 am #734506Josh31Participant“Josh, are you Joseph?”
We are on opposite ends of the spectrum on most issues.
I may be the anti-Joseph.
January 18, 2011 10:03 am at 10:03 am #734507kapustaParticipantSender Av:
Fair enough. I always thought it was obvious from my posts, but I guess thats from my side after all. In any case, welcome to the CR. 🙂
(Just out of curiosity, what about the ** is more likely male than female?)
January 18, 2011 3:08 pm at 3:08 pm #734508Jack DanielsMemberkapusta when i was a “lurker” i read the gs threads..
January 19, 2011 2:45 am at 2:45 am #734509Sender AvMemberKapusta, I think it looks kind of like mace(s) and Wolf does it.
January 19, 2011 7:02 am at 7:02 am #734510Mother in IsraelMemberUpdated list:
TMB, helpful, Ruff Ruff, Jose, Volvie, Joseph, Sam I Am, gabboim, Bed-Stuy
January 19, 2011 2:30 pm at 2:30 pm #734511Bed-StuyParticipantHaleiVi, Jose, Ruff Ruff, etc./a host of other names that have been labeled/blocked for allegedly being joseph are in fact not him and have nothing to do with him. Doesn’t seem though the facts matter in that case as the block remains. We should label everyone in the CR as either joseph or not-joseph and see which side has more…
Thank you Joseph for that comment. We can now turn down the heat in here after your wonderful contribution of hot air
January 19, 2011 3:59 pm at 3:59 pm #734512smartcookieMemberFunny, when I saw bed-stuys first few posts, something clicked in my head.
January 19, 2011 4:16 pm at 4:16 pm #734513Bed-StuyParticipantI like the turn down at least.
I’m out again
Moderator’s note:
Sorry, but our Auto-Joseph detector seems to be malfunctioning. Rather than deleting the entire post, it seems to have deleted random words. We hope to fix this as soon as we have nothing else of importance to do. In the meantime, do realize that all Joseph posts have been altered from how he originally submitted them
January 19, 2011 6:09 pm at 6:09 pm #734514☕️coffee addictParticipantI don’t understand this whole issue of “Joseph” (not siding either way) why couldn’t it be a yeshiva in EY (like Ner Yakov) that only has 1 computer and therefore the bachurim all use that computer?
January 19, 2011 6:17 pm at 6:17 pm #734515Sender AvMembermbachur, for one (1) ner yaccov closed. and 2) that computer never worked(at least I never learned how to use it). Anyway the kids I went to Ner Jake with I dont think would know what Joseph knows. Although the was a kid named Joseph there(but like I said I dont think he would know a lot of this stuff). And before anyone makes judgements on me, I was not a typical ner Jake kid.
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘The Joseph Thread’ is closed to new replies.