Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › The government's role
- This topic has 26 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by Avi K.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 7, 2016 11:45 pm at 11:45 pm #617944☕️coffee addictParticipant
What do you view is governments role in your life?
How would you like it to impact your life?
July 8, 2016 12:49 am at 12:49 am #1158529JosephParticipantThe lesser, the besser.
July 8, 2016 2:14 am at 2:14 am #1158530akupermaParticipantBy government are you referring to the network of frum institutions that dominate communal life, or the clowns in the city halls and capitol buildings?
July 8, 2016 2:35 am at 2:35 am #1158531charliehallParticipant‘By government are you referring to the network of frum institutions that dominate communal life, or the clowns in the city halls and capitol buildings?’
It is those clowns who fund the frum institutions with tax money from non-Jews.
July 8, 2016 3:11 am at 3:11 am #1158532JosephParticipantJews pay more taxes, per-capita, than non-Jews.
July 8, 2016 3:31 am at 3:31 am #1158533Ex-CTLawyerParticipantas one of the few (if not only) members of the YW Coffee Room who actually holds an elected office in a Town Hall I resent being called a clown.
I and my fellow legislative body members deal with the budget,taxes laws/rules and regulations that provide Police, Fire, EMS, school buses, pave and plow the roads, library, public parks, pools, etc.
And not a single member of this body gets a cent for our many hours of service nor do we get reimbursement for expenses.
Working to make our communities better and safer places to raise our families does not make us clowns
July 8, 2016 4:56 am at 4:56 am #1158534yehudayonaParticipantJoseph, can you back your claim that Jews pay more taxes per capita than non-Jews?
July 8, 2016 5:13 am at 5:13 am #1158535Avi KParticipantCTL, you are, in fact, supporting the conservative view that services (those that should not be privatized) should be as local as possible. As for not being paid, one can also say that it creates conflicts of interest as officials must have business interests in order to live.
July 8, 2016 10:13 am at 10:13 am #1158536JosephParticipantYY, Jews earn significantly above the national average income, and thus pay more taxes.
July 8, 2016 11:38 am at 11:38 am #1158537Ex-CTLawyerParticipant@Avi K
Please don’t put words in my mouth or decide that I am supporting a particular view.
I am elected in local government, This doesn’t mean that I believe services should be as local as possible.
I speak to CT. A small state composed of only 169 municipalities. We did away with County Government back about 50 years ago.
I am in the forefront in the call for regional government and services. We don’t need 150+ Chiefs of Police (some towns don’t have their own police but a resident state trooper), we don’t need 150+ Fire Chiefs and Fire Marshals. We don’t need independent Health Departments and Boards of Education in every little town. We already have a few regional school systems and more are in order to save millions of tax dollars. What I’d really like is for one statewide Board of Education to exist with uniform pay for employees, and equal spending on students…no more individual fiefdoms. Our Town hosts the regional waste treatment and transfer station for 3 towns..no need for duplicative facilities.
As for your comment about not being paid and conflicts of interest. No elected official in our town may do business with the town, nor may an immediate family member or the official have a management position of ownership position in a company doing business with or lobbying the town.
Towns of less than 50,000 population could ill afford to pay what amounts to a living to 20+ members of their legislative body. In fact our town has only 4 paid elected officials, two full time and two part time.
July 8, 2016 1:07 pm at 1:07 pm #1158538akupermaParticipantNote the Jewish communities run schools and libraries, and provide welfare services including emergency health service – all more effectively and cheaply than the government. Even without de jure autonomy (something we never had in America and lost in Europe of 200 years ago), the governance of our community is functional, and cost efficient relative to the the federal, state and city governments.
July 8, 2016 1:49 pm at 1:49 pm #1158539yehudayonaParticipantJoseph, that’s a specious argument. Donald Trump makes a lot more money than I do, but he probably pays less in taxes. As Leona Helmsley said, “Only little people pay taxes.”
July 8, 2016 2:12 pm at 2:12 pm #1158540JosephParticipantYY, it is undeniable that American Jews make, on average, significantly more than the average American income as well as a result of the preceding pay more dollars in taxes than the average American.
Donald Trump pays more in taxes than you despite all his tax breaks. In fact, he pays more in taxes than you make.
July 8, 2016 2:16 pm at 2:16 pm #1158541Ex-CTLawyerParticipantNote that the Jewish Communities in the US running schools and libraries are often doing it using Tax dollars and public services. I can’t guaranty that they are run more cheaply than local government run libraries and schools and they certainly don’t offer the same products/services/technology.
Our town provides the school bus transportation for students in religious day schools. We provide the Special Education and Physical Education for them as well. We even pay for and provide textbooks for secular subjects. We clean the snow from their sidewalks in winter, we provide fire and police service. Our health department provides the school nurses and does immunizations and eye screenings…all at no charge to the Jewish community.
AND>>>before you say the Jewish community members are paying taxes and not using the public schools. That doesn’t hold OOT. Jewish Day and other Parochial schools are regional. The local day school draws 80% of its students from outside the municipality who foots these expenses from local property tax. There is no ‘school tax’ in Connecticut.
July 8, 2016 2:46 pm at 2:46 pm #1158542☕️coffee addictParticipantMy question is based on the joes premice, that the less government the better,
With that comes side effects,
Why would you want government to give vouchers from private school, just get more of a rebate,
Why use a municipal pool if there are private ones
Why go on mofeis
The more power you give the government the more power the government had to make up new laws that might not be to your liking
July 8, 2016 2:52 pm at 2:52 pm #1158543Avi KParticipantCTL, you praised local officials as being efficient and dedicated.(after full disclosure on your negia). In my experience on both sides of the desk the inefficiency and laziness that sometimes crosses the line of robbery of bureaucrats is inversely proportional to the level of government from local to national.Moreover, contrary to what you claim, even without these problems a central government cannot give the individual solutions that are necessary but play to the lowest common denominator.
Perhaps because of this Rambam only enumerates four jobs for the central government: national security, fighting crime, upholding Torah and meting out justice (although each province and locality also had its own system of battei din, as Rambam himself discusses at the beginning Hilchot Sanhedrin). Tzedaka is given over to local communities (and, in fact, Rav Cherlow wrote in the name of Rav Kook that this is because of the inability of a central government’s clerks to give each individual an appropriate solution).
July 8, 2016 3:21 pm at 3:21 pm #1158544JosephParticipantCTL, your point about parochial schools isn’t clear. CT governments (either local or state) pays the tuition of public school students but not private school students. Parochial students need to pay their own tuition. It hasn’t anything to do whether the parochial schools are local or regional.
July 8, 2016 3:25 pm at 3:25 pm #1158545charliehallParticipant“Jewish communities run schools and libraries, and provide welfare services including emergency health service – all more effectively and cheaply than the government”
That is not true. What Jewish libraries are there? Jewish welfare agencies get their funding from the government. And yeshivot with good special education cost a lot more than the per pupil expenditures at good public high schools.
July 8, 2016 4:07 pm at 4:07 pm #1158546Ex-CTLawyerParticipantJoseph…..
A CT town has both Jewish and Christian religious day schools, as well as public schools. The town’s residents pay property tax. That tax pays for running the public schools and providing bus service, school nurses, secular textbooks, special education services. Physical Education services, health department inspection and certification of the cafeterias, police and fire protection.
Every student in the public schools is a RESIDENT of the town and is funded by townspeople. Many of the students in the religious schools (more than 70% in the Jewish day school) are not town residents. They receive these town funded services, but their families pay no taxes to support the town. They pay in the towns where they live.
If we had a state run education system and a state school tax, instead of locally property tax to fund this, the burden would be shared equally on all state residents.
July 8, 2016 8:38 pm at 8:38 pm #1158547nishtdayngesheftParticipantCharlie,
What Jewish libraries are there? If you would live in a Jewish area, you would know. There are many.
Jewish welfare agencies that get government funding, provide help on a non sectarian basis. (perhaps yours don’t, but the many I’ve dealt with do. No not as a consumer for you and ZD).
The same for your lie that it costs more to provide special education in Jeeish settings than it costs the public schools. It is a gross lie. Your claim is Horse feathers.
July 8, 2016 8:45 pm at 8:45 pm #1158548☕️coffee addictParticipantCharlie
What Jewish libraries are there?
Ever been to the 5 towns ( I guess not) it’s called the Levi Yitzchak library
July 9, 2016 6:53 pm at 6:53 pm #1158549Avi KParticipantCTL, non-residents in general receive police and fire protection. Should there be a unified world police force to spread the cost “equitably”. Does it matter that non-residents spend money in the town (if your town is like my settlement the kids buy in the local mini-market during breaks). The fact of the matter is that central bureaucracies are more inefficient and less responsive to the citizens’ needs than local officials. I recommend the article “The Secret of Swiss Success Is Decentralization” at fee.org (I would type a link but I still do not know if the policy has been completely or only partially changed).
July 10, 2016 10:14 am at 10:14 am #1158550Ex-CTLawyerParticipantAviK
No my town is not like your settlement. Students who are attending day school and don’t live in my town are dropped at the door by parents or bus and picked up at the end of the day. They are not permitted off school grounds during the day and do not shop for anything here. Even our public schools are closed campuses. Students are not free to leave and return during the day.
My call for centralization/regionalization is in a small state. Our entire state has only 3.6 million people…contrast that with the Borough of Brooklyn which has 2.6 million. We have 8 counties in CT, but no county government has existed since the 1960s. Simply replacing more than 150 small municipal fiefdoms with 8 governments makes sense.
As it is small towns currently rely on neighbors with mutual aid pacts for police and fire, There are 16 regional school districts combined pf 2 or more small towns with too few students and/or resources to run their own school systems. At least 12 towns don’t have their own high schools.
Waste processing is already regional, there are 27 Cable TV franchise areas in the state. No Cable company could bid town by town, it would be economic death to do business that way. Many towns have government composed of mostly part-time employees or volunteers and town hall may be open only one or 2 1/2 days a week. None of this makes sense in a modern world. Health and safety are hampered by one horse operations.
Unlike big states such as NY. Our state legislators are part timers who can not survive on the $28,000 yearly salary (which hasn’t been raised in 13 years). Most are employed or in business locally and in constant touch with residents.
I find state government more responsive than local in many towns. The workers are full time professionals and don’t care about your political party affiliation. In little towns and some of our big cities, one party controls government 100% and if you do not march to their commend you get no service..
July 10, 2016 3:00 pm at 3:00 pm #1158551Avi KParticipantCTL,
1. Are they schools or prisons?
2. My experience with central government workers is that they do not care about anything. They just want to collect salaries for a minimal effort. Of course, one can also say that they give equally bad service regardless of political affiliation. When people know you it is hard for them to be unresponsive. Conversely, if someone is a problem neighbor it is easier to deal with him as he wants them to remain responsive to him. In fact, one double settlement (there were two founding groups, one baalei-batish and one yeshivish so they made two separate settlements one right next to the other) united so that it could become a town and run its own municipal affairs.
3. You are assuming that there should be state-allocated franchises. I am in favor of free enterprise.
July 10, 2016 3:32 pm at 3:32 pm #1158552JosephParticipantNew York’s part-time legislature hasn’t been working out too well.
July 10, 2016 3:34 pm at 3:34 pm #1158553Ex-CTLawyerParticipantAvi K
They are schools. Campuses are closed for security reasons. Need I remind readers of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre 2 1/2 years ago…only twenty minutes from me and we knew some of the families who lost children.
Utilities, and Cable TV/Internet/phone providers are utilities cannot be free enterprise. The cost to build is so expensive that unless awarded a franchise none would exist. I spent 12 years as a Cable TV Commissioner in Ct and am very familiar with the industry.
I’m old enough to remember when the CT state legislature only met every other year and passed two year budgets.
July 11, 2016 7:19 am at 7:19 am #1158554Avi KParticipantCTL,
1. Why not require that kids go around with armed guards? It seems to me that “helicopter parenting” is getting way out of hand. The persecution of free-range parents by “child welfare” busybodies (where are they in real cases of abuse?) is the perfect example of a choking bureaucracy.
2. In both the US and Israel telephone service has been deregulated with great success.See the Cato Institutes’ paper “What Happens When Local Phone Service
Is Deregulated?” on-line. Crony capitalism only benefits the cronies.
3. Was CT a better state then or now?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.