Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨‍🔬💉🚫

Millhouse: Any damage must be done by some individual vaccine, so it only makes sense to test that specific vaccine for whatever harm it is that it’s alleged to be doing.

You don’t make sense! There are many medicines that were tested for safety. But if you take 7-8 medicines
AT SAME TIME it can be Deadly. So too, can taking 7-8 Vaccines AT SAME TIME be far more dangerous then
just taking one dose. Therefore the insane CDC SCHEDULE must be tested against 100% Unvaccinated.

As per Doom,

The link between the MMR vaccine and autism is encephalitis.

This is how it works, measles can cause encephalitis, so the vaccine can probably also cause it.
Encephalitis can cause autism (its not the case, but this is the claim).

Yet encephalitis is rare, especially in pediatrics.

What are we supposed to make out of this.

Does this actually mean that autism is a genetic disease? Can it actually be the case, so the studies which show that people with siblings that have been diagnosed with autism are more likely to be diagnosed with autism, regardless of vaccination status, are actually correct?

Dooms

“Doomsday: “Why won’t CDC do the Retrospective Study as had been requested by Congressmen???”

2cents: You mentioned this earlier, and shown to be incorrect. Sonwhy bring this up again?

Folks, See how 2cents keeps on lying?
Throughout this thread I and other Anti-Vaxxers kept asking why CDC won’t do a Retrospective Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Study. 2cents claimed there WERE 2 studies on vaxxed vs unvaxxed but those studies”

First off, why are you pondering to the ‘folks’ instead of focusing on what you are writing?

You asked why the CDC doesnt comply with Confresses eequest, this has been discussed that there was no request by Congress.

Is that a lie? Has this not been discussed?

Your a phony, actually your not a phony just an alternative person with an alternative agenda and alternative comprehension.

Dooms,

Below is from The Encephalitis Society:

Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is a very effective way to prevent against these diseases. All three of these infections are important causes of encephalitis, and before MMR vaccine was introduced all three infections were common in the UK.

The vaccine is unequivocally safer than letting children catch the diseases. In a study carried out in Finland between 1982 and 1986 of over half of million children, it was found that the incidence of encephalitis in the three months following a MMR vaccination was no different to the overall incidence. The example below compares the risk of measles with the risk of MMR vaccine.

Measles

1-3 in 1,000 children contracting measles will develop encephalitis concurrent with the measles infection. 10–15% of those children will die and a further 25% will be left with permanent neurological damage.
1 in 1,000 children with measles will develop post-infectious encephalitis.
1 in 25,000 of children (1 in 5,500 children if they are under 1) with measles will develop subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) which has a fatal (death) outcome.
1-2 in 1.000.000 children who had vaccination will develop encephalitis from the vaccination which is less than the incidence of all types of encephalitis.

doomsday
“You don’t make sense! There are many medicines that were tested for safety. But if you take 7-8 medicines
AT SAME TIME it can be Deadly. So too, can taking 7-8 Vaccines AT SAME TIME be far more dangerous then”

Sorry, but you don’t make sense.
taking multiple medications doesnt magically make then deadly. True, there are specific combinations where one medication inhibits the breakdown (or accelerates) of another . Thus in those specific cases, for reasns that are clear taking them together can have detrimental effects.

Also earlier, you implied that while healthiest where those who are 100% unvaccinated, those who were vaccinated would benefit from the flu vaccine. IS this in fact your view.

Also Machla is eagerly awaiting a response to her question

Is there a point to arguing with someone who will not listen to science, Da’as Torah or reason and only repeats the same information no matter what you say?

2cents: You asked why the CDC doesnt comply with Confresses eequest, this has been discussed that there was no request by Congress.

Congressman Bill Posey and Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney have repeatedly asked CDC officials to do
a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study. CDC refuses. Congressman Posey and Congresswoman Maloney proposed a
Law to FORCE CDC to do a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study “Vaccine Safety Study Act”.
But because Pharmaceutical Industry is the Biggest BRIBER of Congress, this Law was not passed.

Folks, you just cannot believe anything the ProVaxxers on this thread say.
They are just lying through their teeth.

Ubiquiton: taking multiple medications doesnt magically make then deadly.

Folks, do you believe that? Ever heard of a doctor prescribing 7-8 Medications to be taken AT ONE TIME???

Ubiquiton, Has anyone TESTED the CDC Schedule (not individual vaccines) to see if that statement is True?

The answer is No. The CDC SCHEDULE of 7-8 Vaccines given at once has NEVER been safety tested!
Folks, Still Trust the CDC? Still Trust that Vaccines are safe???

You asked why the CDC doesnt comply with Confresses eequest, this has been discussed that there was no request by Congress.

Yes, when this was exposed she simply switched claims, and now says the study was requested by congressmen. Which is perfectly true, but irrelevant, because there’s nothing special about a nut who happens to be in Congress, and no reason the CDC should pay such a person’s delusional rantings any special attention.

Doomsday: It is against the LAW for a substance to be labeled “X-Free” to contain ANY “trace amounts” of X

Yes, it is. Another Millhouse Lie.

No, doomsday, it really isn’t. There is no such law as you claim. Look it up, or ask someone who actually knows the law and they will tell you. You are ignorant and delusional, and just make up laws which do not exist.

“Folks, do you believe that? Ever heard of a doctor prescribing 7-8 Medications to be taken AT ONE TIME???”

I’m not sure if you are being serious but litterally daily.

Here is a med list of patient I saw these are his AM meds (note: he is part of an “older generation” who was not zoche have received them all as a child:

1) Aspirin
2) HCTZ
3) Nifedipine
4) Metformin
5) Januvia
6) Olmesartan
7) Metoprolol
8) Xarelto

“Has anyone TESTED the CDC Schedule (not individual vaccines) to see if that statement is True?”

Of course! otherwise how would we know?

for example see : Glanz JM, Newcomer SR, Daley MF, et al. Association Between Estimated Cumulative Vaccine Antigen Exposure Through the First 23 Months of Life and Non–Vaccine-Targeted Infections From 24 Through 47 Months of Age. JAMA. 2018;319(9):906–913. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0708

“Folks, Still Trust the CDC? Still Trust that Vaccines are safe???”
More than ever! I knew they had studies, but didn’t realize HOW MANY

Also, when you get a chance if you could clarify your view on whether more vaccines help those who have already been vaccinated (as you indicated earlier)
and if you could please answer MAchla’s question

Thanks

2cents: You asked why the CDC doesnt comply with Confresses eequest, this has been discussed that there was no request by Congress.

Congressman Bill Posey and Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney have repeatedly asked CDC officials to do a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study. CDC refuses.

Posey and Maloney are not Congress. The CDC has no reason to pay them any attention.

Congressman Posey and Congresswoman Maloney proposed a
Law to FORCE CDC to do a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study “Vaccine Safety Study Act”. But because Pharmaceutical Industry is the Biggest BRIBER of Congress, this Law was not passed.

More deliberate outright lies and slander. You have no right to accuse anyone of criminal activity without evidence. Or I will accuse you right here of murder, robbery, mugging, and removing the tags from mattresses.

The bill (not a law) was buried in committee not because of any alleged bribery, but because it had absolutely no merit. There was never any reason to expect anything else. Or are you next going to suggest that bills proposed by congressmen can automatically be expected to pass, and there’s something unusual about this one getting thrown in the garbage where it belonged?

Dooms.

“There were other explanations why Vaccinated kids scored higher in school (NOT the vaccines)!
The Vaccinated children had:
1) had mothers with more education,
2) had higher socioeconomic status,
3) lived in larger homes,
4) had more toilet/sanitation access,
5) had fewer siblings,
6) had better-nourished mothers,
7) had more breastfeeding as infants

…than the UNVACCINATED!”

Exactly, it so happens to be that the uneducated do not vaccinate.

Below are exerts from studies with information where this was published, unlike dumb doom (sorry for the name calling, but now that you have repeatedly resorted to the name-calling, it is about time I give you a label)

Vaccines not associated with Autism. (PubMed 23545349)

“This case-control study of more than 1,000 children compared the total exposure of antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), autistic disorder (AD), or ASD with regression to the total exposure in children who were not diagnosed with any form of autism. The children included in the study were aged 6- 13 years, but authors studied their exposures from vaccines during the first 2 years of life. Results showed that the odds of developing any of the three forms of autism studied did not rise with increased exposure to antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides.”

Timely vaccination during infancy has no adverse effect on neuropsychological outcomes 7 to 10 years later. Pediatrics June 2010

“RESULTS: Timely vaccination was associated with better performance on 12 outcomes in univariate testing and remained associated with better performance for 2 outcomes in multivariable analyses. No statistically significant differences favored delayed receipt. In secondary analyses, children with the greatest vaccine exposure during the first 7 months of life performed better than children with the least vaccine exposure on 15 outcomes in univariate testing; these differences did not persist in multivariable analyses. No statistically significant differences favored the less vaccinated children.
CONCLUSIONS: Timely vaccination during infancy has no adverse effect on neuropsychological outcomes 7 to 10 years later. These data may reassure parents who are concerned that children receive too many vaccines too soon.”

Lancet, Volume 351, Issue 9112

“No evidence for measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine-associated inflammatory bowel disease or autism in a 14-year prospective study”

Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2026-9.

“Our analyses do not support a causal association between MMR vaccine and autism. If such an association occurs, it is so rare that it could not be identified in this large regional sample.”

Kaye JA, et al., British Medical Journal. 2001; 322:460-63

“The data provide evidence that no correlation exists between the prevalence of MMR vaccination and the rapid increase in the risk of autism over time.”

More studies.

No correlation between MMR vaccine rates and autism. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1183-118

“Results Essentially no correlation was observed between the secular trend of early childhood MMR immunization rates in California and the secular trend in numbers of children with autism enrolled in California’s regional service center system. For the 1980-1994 birth cohorts, a marked, sustained increase in autism case numbers was noted, from 44 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1980 cohort to 208 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1994 cohort (a 373% relative increase), but changes in early childhood MMR immunization coverage over the same time period were much smaller and of shorter duration. Immunization coverage by the age of 24 months increased from 72% to 82%, a relative increase of only 14%, over the same time period.
Conclusions These data do not suggest an association between MMR immunization among young children and an increase in autism occurrence”

Another study disproves Wakefield’s findings. Davis RL, et al., Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2001;155(3): 354-9

“Conclusions Vaccination with MMR or other MCV, or the timing of vaccination early in life, did not increase the risk for IBD.”

Study of 535,544 vaccinated children found no association between the MMR vaccine and Encephalitis, Meningitis or autism. Makela A, et al., Pediatrics. 2002; 110: 957-63 (PubMed 12415036)

“CONCLUSIONS:
We did not identify any association between MMR vaccination and encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or autism.”

Study of 537,303 Children fails to find a correlation between the MMR vaccine and Autism. Madsen KM, et al., New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;

“CONCLUSIONS:
This study provides strong evidence against the hypothesis that MMR vaccination causes autism.”

If this is a lie, then be so kind to show us all the request that was submitted by Congress.

This was one of Doomsday’s many lies.

More studies proving vaccine safety and debunking myths by radical anti-medicine websites.

Study of total population showing no change to Autism despite completely stopping to vaccinate. (PMID: 15877763)

“RESULTS:
The MMR vaccination rate in the city of Yokohama declined significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1992, and not a single vaccination was administered in 1993 or thereafter. In contrast, cumulative incidence of ASD up to age seven increased significantly in the birth cohorts of years 1988 through 1996 and most notably rose dramatically beginning with the birth cohort of 1993.
CONCLUSIONS:
The significance of this finding is that MMR vaccination is most unlikely to be a main cause of ASD, that it cannot explain the rise over time in the incidence of ASD, and that withdrawal of MMR in countries where it is still being used cannot be expected to lead to a reduction in the incidence of ASD.”

Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism. institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press: 2004

“The committee rejected a causal relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism as well as a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.”

Review of autistic children shows no regression that is related to the MMR vaccine. PMID: 16729252

“There was no evidence that onset of autistic symptoms or of regression was related to measles-mumps-rubella vaccination. The implications of these findings for the existence of a ‘regressive phenotype’ of ASD are discussed.”

No difference in developmental disorders despite not being exposed to thimerosal. Fombonne E, et al., Pediatrics. 2006; 118(1): e139-50

“CONCLUSIONS:
The prevalence of pervasive developmental disorder in Montreal was high, increasing in recent birth cohorts as found in most countries. Factors accounting for the increase include a broadening of diagnostic concepts and criteria, increased awareness and, therefore, better identification of children with pervasive developmental disorders in communities and epidemiologic surveys, and improved access to services. The findings ruled out an association between pervasive developmental disorder and either high levels of ethylmercury exposure comparable with those experienced in the United States in the 1990s or 1- or 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccinations”

No association between Thimerosal and autism. Hviid, et al., Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003; 290(13):1763-6

“CONCLUSION:
The results do not support a causal relationship between childhood vaccination with thimerosal-containing vaccines and development of autistic-spectrum disorders.”

Increase in autism when thimerosal was discontinued showing no correlation. PMID: 12949291

“CONCLUSIONS:
The discontinuation of thimerosal-containing vaccines in Denmark in 1992 was followed by an increase in the incidence of autism. Our ecological data do not support a correlation between thimerosal-containing vaccines and the incidence of autism.”

Thimerosal-containing vaccines do not cause autism. Stehr-Green P, et al., American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;

“CONCLUSIONS:
The body of existing data, including the ecologic data presented herein, is not consistent with the hypothesis that increased exposure to Thimerosal-containing vaccines is responsible for the apparent increase in the rates of autism in young children being observed worldwide.”

Levels of mercury in children after receipt of thimerosal-containing vaccines. Pediatrics Feb 2008, Volume 121.

After 5 days there were no detectable mercury levels, the half-life of intramuscular ethyl mercury is substantially shorter than that of oral methyl mercury.

Lower rate of autism in children vaccinated with the MMR vaccine vs those that are unvaccinated. Budzyn D, et al., The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal.

“RESULTS:
For children vaccinated before diagnosis, autism risk was lower in children vaccinated with MMR than in the nonvaccinated (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.52) as well as to vaccinated with single measles vaccine (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.91). The risk for vaccinated versus nonvaccinated (independent of vaccine type) was 0.28 (95% CI: 0.10-0.76). The risk connected with being vaccinated before onset of first symptoms was significantly lower only for MMR versus single vaccine (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS:
The study provides evidence against the association of autism with either MMR or a single measles vaccine.”

I am (perhaps foolishly) wading back in here to point out a contradiction in doomsday’s propaganda.

Doomsday demands a study of “Vaccinateded per CDC Schedule vs 100% UnVaccinated.” Implying that it is the vaccine package as a whole (including the Polio and Smallpox vaccines) that is causing the problem and not just the newer vaccines.

On the other hand doomsday repeats, again and again, that “Since the CDC TRIPLED the Vaccine schedule around 1990, Autism went from 1:10,000 to 1:50 today!” Implying that it is the relatively recent increase in vaccines that have caused the problem. Make up your mind, doomsday.

As an aside, doomsday is confusing autism diagnosis with actual autism. Autism was increasingly diagnosed from 1987 onwards because it’s definition was expanded in the DSM and broadened again in 1994 and 2000. Doctors diagnose what they are taught to diagnose and give the labels that are recognized by their fields and the government (that provide services).

I don’t know where doomsday’s numbers for her parade of horribles from vaccines are coming from (some anti-vaxx site?) but SIDS deaths are down in the United States since 1990 (because parents were taught not to let babies sleep on their stomachs), not up. From the CDC website: “Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) rates declined considerably from 130.3 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1990 to 38.0 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2016.”

So take doomsday’s numbers with many grains of salt.

2Cents: These were my words“there was no request by Congress.” If this is a lie, then be so kind to show us all the request that was submitted by Congress.

Yes, it is a LIE because MY words were ““Why won’t CDC do the Retrospective Study as had been requested by Congressmen???””

I wrote CONGRESSMEN not CONGRESS as 2Cents yet again Lies, this time by Changing My Words!

Doomsday,

“I wrote CONGRESSMEN not CONGRESS as 2Cents yet again Lies, this time by Changing My Words!”

I posted what I myself wrote, which is that Congress has never requested, you claimed that what I wrote was a lie, now you are claiming that I changed what you wrote, why would you think that I would be at all interested in what you wrote?

If that was a lie, then can you actually show us where Congress requested the study?

By the way, you did post earlier that Congress requested a certain study. Was that an error on your part, on the part of the radical conspiracy-minded site or was that a twist of the actual truth, which is typical for you.

You can write liar as many times as you prefer, the fact remains you have posted a lot of stuff that has been shown to actually conclude the opposite of what you implied they conclude.
you have posted stuff that is simply not true, this has been proven multiple times.

Does it make you feel less guilty if you start blaming others for lying when all they did was just copy/paste something that was already written?

As I have posted earlier, you are either a fraud or very dumb. Now I am thinking that you are just a dumb fraudster. You have an agenda, and it is for sure not the facts.

You make up facts (or at best just accept what is posted on radical anti-medicine blogs), you blame people for lying, just because you prefer that it be that way, despite the fact that there was nothing to even lie about as I was just posting what I posted earlier. Typical ‘alternative’ way of thinking.

Edited

Folks, PROOF 2Cents is a Liar:

12/11/18 #1641462 Doomsday: Why won’t CDC do the Retrospective Study as had been requested by Congressmen???
12/11/18 #1642162 Doomsday: Why won’t CDC do the Retrospective Study as had been requested by Congressmen???
12/12/18 2Cents: You asked why the CDC doesnt comply with Congresses request, this has been discussed that there was no request by Congress.

Folks, look at the above Posts – Did I say Congress or CongressMEN? 2Cents LIED that I said Congress when
I TWICE wrote CongressMEN.
Folks, I gave the dates and the Post Numbers so you can see for yourself that 2Cents is the Liar.

And there WERE requests by CongressMEN and CongressMEN even introduced a Bill to FORCE CDC to conduct a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study which CDC adamantly Refuses to do!!

Folks, the ProVaxxers keep bringing up Studies “proving” that vaccines don’t cause autism.

I have given concrete examples on specific studies cited HOW they committed Fraud.

Like the Phillipines study that showed Vaccinated children had higher cognition then Unvaccinated Children. The Fraud is that Phillipine Vaccine Schedule has only a FRACTION of ALUMINUM that the CDC Schedule has. Also, In Philippines, the Vaccinated Children came from Richer Homes, with Better Educated Parents, Better Food, Better Sanitation (toilets) and THAT’S why they score higher in school – not the vaccines!

Another CDC Fraudulent Study: The Danish Study claimed that the number of NEW Autism Cases went UP
AFTER Thimerosal was removed from Vaccines. But here is how CDC Study Committed FRAUD:

1. BEFORE 1992, the Fake researchers ONLY counted autistic children in HOSPITALS. AFTER 1992, the Fake researchers included autistic children who were living at HOME (outpatients)! There are TEN TIMES as
many Autistic Children living at Home then in Hospitals. THAT is how they FAKED that the number of
Autism Increased!!!

2. AFTER 1992, The Danish Government CHANGED the Definition of Autism to a more inclusive one.
THAT is ANOTHER REASON, why the number of children diagnosed with Autism Went Up!!!

3. All the Researchers were Employees or had Close Connection to Vaccine Industry which they did NOT
Disclose. This is FRAUD.

4. One researcher, Poul Thorson, was indicted on 22 counts of Fraud and fled USA and is on the Most Wanted Criminals List. These are the “Holy Researchers” employed by the CDC!

Folks, after seeing how the CDC hires Criminals to produce Fake Studies to Lie to the public that Vaccines don’t cause Autism (it does), how can you trust them?

Dooms,

“he Fraud is that Phillipine Vaccine Schedule has only a FRACTION of ALUMINUM that the CDC Schedule has”

You know that until you do not prove what you wrote, no one will take your word for it.

“BEFORE 1992, the Fake researchers ONLY counted autistic children in HOSPITALS. AFTER 1992, the Fake researchers included autistic children who were living at HOME (outpatients)! There are TEN TIMES as
many Autistic Children living at Home then in Hospitals.”

Which Danish study are you referring to, there are a number of them, they are all very large.

I actually took the time to read the Danish study that was published in the NEJM titled “A POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF MEASLES, MUMPS, AND RUBELLA
VACCINATION AND AUTISM”
Nowhere does it state that there has been a change in 1995 on what type of patients they were focused on. furthermore, some of the same patients that have not gotten the MMR vaccine have also not gotten other vaccines, yet the rate of autism was the same.

This is the conclusion;
“There was no association between
the age at the time of vaccination, the time since vaccination, or the date of vaccination and the development of autistic disorder.”

yet you and the radical website age of autism have figured out that this is just a fraud.

maybe you are referring to this study? (JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Oct;)

“CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:
Our population-based recurrence risk estimate is lower than the recently reported estimates from clinical samples. Our results demonstrate no time trend in the ASDs recurrence risk as seen in the ASDs prevalence. The difference in the recurrence risk between full- and half-siblings supports the role of genetics in ASDs, while the significant recurrence risk in maternal half-siblings may support the role of factors associated with pregnancy and the maternal intrauterine environment in ASDs.”

Also, you do know that age of autism is not a source, you make a claim like this, you DO need to prove it.

“AFTER 1992, The Danish Government CHANGED the Definition of Autism to a more inclusive one.
THAT is ANOTHER REASON, why the number of children diagnosed with Autism Went Up!!!”

Source?
Also, are you implying that the increase in autism is due to a changed definition? if so, does this also disprove your notion that vaccines are the cause for the increase in autism?

“3. All the Researchers were Employees or had Close Connection to Vaccine Industry which they did NOT
Disclose. This is FRAUD.”

Other than they reaching conclusions and findings that are inconsistent with your belief, is there any reason that you are making these accusations?

“4. One researcher, Poul Thorson, was indicted on 22 counts of Fraud and fled USA and is on the Most Wanted Criminals List. These are the “Holy Researchers” employed by the CDC!”

First off, its Thorsen not Thorson. Second, he has stolen money from the CDC, this is not a secret and has nothing to do with his research.
Third, he was not the lead researcher on any of the studies regarding vaccines.

I have posted multiple studies that clearly show that vaccine safety has been extensively researched and all studies have come to a similar conclusion, vaccines are safe.

I am sorry that you need to resort to twisting the truth and making up facts, the rest of the world prefers to rely on real studies and not gotcha statements that are far from the truth.

Sorry if you feel offended or as an outcast, that is what people like you are. ‘Alternative’ people, that have a dislike to evidence and research-based medicine.

From Dooms.

“Folks, PROOF 2Cents is a Liar:”

Hey, you dont need any proof, I am OK with you calling people names, But can we act like grownups and look at the data for a moment?

Why would my integrity matter here unless you do not care about the facts?

Or you assume that we all makeup facts like you do.

“Dr. Joseph Biederman was a researcher who made Fraudulent Studies for Pharmaceutical Companies.
In addition to being paid the standard fee as a researcher, the Pharmaceutical Companies also paid
Biederman $1.6 MILLION in “consulting” and “speaking” fees. In other words Biederman got a $1.6 Million BRIBE from Pharmaceutical Companies as a reward for making Fraudulent Studies for them!”

What in the world does this have to do with Vaccines?

By the way, this actually proves the integrity of the evidence-based medicine system, should someone be caught with a conflict of interest and not disclose it, they will be disciplined as Dr Biederman was.

I would like to see the ‘alternative’ people have this regard for science as the medical world does.

If Wakefield is good for you and you hold him in such high regard, why is Dr Biederman suddenly a bad person? why is the scientific community now to blame only because one person had a nondisclosed conflict of interest and was exposed and disciplined?

This nicely proves its integrity.