Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › So I left
- This topic has 31 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 7 months ago by ☕ DaasYochid ☕.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2012 7:11 pm at 7:11 pm #604822popa_bar_abbaParticipant
So this place I live, this kid started a daf yomi shiur. So I decided maybe I’ll go to it.
So I reckoned for a while if it was a pchisus for me to go, and it was, but I decided to go anyway.
So I went. And sat down. And then they are setting up, and these two girls come in and sit down. See how dumb I am? It was obvious that girls would come. So I left.
See how interesting this is, though. The guy of course cannot ask them not to come (in this situation). And of course he should do the shiur anyway. And the girls are not malicious–they are just misguided and naive. And of course I cannot attend.
And that’s how it was.
September 9, 2012 7:30 pm at 7:30 pm #1066787sheinMemberThat’s the obvious (and correct) reaction to such a misguided situation. So what’s the chiddush here?
September 9, 2012 7:36 pm at 7:36 pm #1066788Matan1ParticipantWhat was wrong with the girls coming to the shiur. Nobody was making them go. They were learn on their own accord. The Prishah matirs this.
September 10, 2012 1:16 am at 1:16 am #1066789HealthParticipantMatan1 -“What was wrong with the girls coming to the shiur. Nobody was making them go. They were learn on their own accord. The Prishah matirs this.”
PBA -did the right thing. 1. The Prisha is a Daas Yochid.
2. There probably wasn’t a Mechiza, so it’s Taroovos.
September 10, 2012 2:42 am at 2:42 am #1066790Sam2ParticipantHealth: I cannot argue with you if you don’t hold by the Prishah. That is a lengthy Sugya and there are Tzdadim either way. However, a Mechitzah isn’t necessary. R’ Moshe has a T’shuvah about a “Meeting Shel Society” where he says it’s Muttar to give a D’var Torah afterwards even if there are women there and he does not necessitate a Mechitza.
September 10, 2012 2:47 am at 2:47 am #1066791popa_bar_abbaParticipant2. There probably wasn’t a Mechiza, so it’s Taroovos.
No, both were issur.
September 10, 2012 3:04 am at 3:04 am #1066792WIYMemberSam2
Does that mean that Rav Moshe also Mattirs Lechatchila to have just a shiur that will be coed?
September 10, 2012 3:27 am at 3:27 am #1066793Sam2ParticipantWIY: I don’t know. As far as I know he doesn’t have a T’shuvah on that issue. I was just pointing out that a Mechitzah wouldn’t be the deciding factor. I always found his Lashon in this one funny though (I forget where it is, it’s towards the end of either O.C 2, 3, or 4).
September 10, 2012 3:34 am at 3:34 am #1066794yitayningwutParticipantNo, both were issur.
snort
September 10, 2012 4:42 pm at 4:42 pm #1066795HealthParticipantSam2 -“WIY: I don’t know. As far as I know he doesn’t have a T’shuvah on that issue. I was just pointing out that a Mechitzah wouldn’t be the deciding factor.”
You most certainly do know, but you pretend. 1. Rav Moshe was talking about a man giving a Shiur to ladies. 2. I even seen Chashuva Rabbis giving a Speech/Shiur to ladies and men at the same time, but they were separated. Don’t you have an imagination? From the description, it sounded like a small Shiur and the girls were real close by. Stop trying to say everything is Mutter. I’m not a Machmir, but this is obviously Ossur.
September 10, 2012 5:02 pm at 5:02 pm #10667962scentsParticipantI do not believe that Reb Moshe would stay at such a shiur either.
September 10, 2012 9:44 pm at 9:44 pm #1066798NechomahParticipantOhTeeDee – I seriously think you misunderstand the situation. PBA truly loves his wife and his mother and his daughters. He simply understands that contact with women is not a free thing. If he were your husband, you would not want him freely socializing with women. This is also a matter of what is permitted to teach to women and in what circumstances. There are so many wonderful things that a woman can learn and do and it doesn’t have with men to be on a level that is equal to theirs in their own right. It does not have be taken in the context of misogynistic or childish when a person realizes that temptation can occur without one even realizing it and this is a difficult thing for some people to control.
September 10, 2012 10:45 pm at 10:45 pm #1066799Matan1ParticipantNechoma,
Maybe the reason that people are susceptible to improper thoughts is because we hyper sexualize everything. If you say that a skirt much be 4 inches below the knee, then if a man sees a woman in a skirt 3 inches below the knee, he will have improper thoughts. If sitting in the same woman is considered taboo(non yichud situation), then when are in a room with a woman, you will have those thoughts.
We obviously have to take this in the context of halacha, but we must realize that unnecessary chumros might be hurting us more than they are helping us.
September 11, 2012 1:13 am at 1:13 am #1066800HaKatanParticipantOTD, the problem is the mixed atmosphere and unnecessary “drawing close to each other” that this type of gathering brings. It’s really not a matter of anyone’s intellectual level.
Matan1, please cite which chumra or chumros is/are unnecessary, and who imposes it/them.
On the other hand, some feel that it’s better to dress so that the skirt only covers the knees when you are both bending over and tugging on it at the same time. And this is not a worse “hyper-sexualization”?
Besides, by your logic, we might as well adopt the standards of the nations and just throw the whole inyan out the window. Why shouldn’t a woman wear shorts and a sleeveless tank top (if even that) rather than out holy and dignified way of dress? Let’s not “hyper-sexualize” the arms and legs, right?
It so happens that your logic is that of the nations, while the Torah’s logic says exactly the opposite. Chazal says about this particular Yetzer HaRa that masbio ra’ev whereas mar’ivo save’a. So if a tempting circumstance of any sort were to arise, CH”V, you’re better off if you are as clean as possible, not CH”V the other way.
I’m not saying to go crazy with unnecessary chumros. But Chaza”l knew what they were talking about. Let’s not pretend to be smarter than Chazal.
September 11, 2012 2:39 am at 2:39 am #1066801popa_bar_abbaParticipantFTR:
1. I walked out because it was a gemara shiur; I probably would have stayed it was a chumash shiur.
2. That is only because of the norms in this shul. I happen to think that a more proper norm is that men and women should not be part of the same interactive shiur. But if this is the norm, then I don’t find it so objectionable that I have to leave.
September 11, 2012 4:23 am at 4:23 am #1066802Sam2ParticipantHealth: This case is also a man giving a Shiur to ladies. And look at R’ Moshe’s T’suvah on a “Meeting Shel Society”, he says that it’s okay to give the co-ed D’var Torah.
September 11, 2012 6:32 am at 6:32 am #1066803HealthParticipantSam – Are you now saying Rav Moshe was Mattir giving a Shiur when men and ladies were sitting next to each other? I don’t believe he ever did this.
September 11, 2012 7:24 am at 7:24 am #1066804Sam2ParticipantHealth: Read the T’shuvah. Unless I am grossly misrecalling this, he doesn’t require a Mechitzah nor does he say that they can’t sit next to each other. (Maybe he is assuming that they already weren’t, but I don’t recall it saying that in the T’shuvah.)
September 11, 2012 3:24 pm at 3:24 pm #1066805cherrybimParticipantL’halacha, you only need a seperation for davening and mingling. To the others: how do you sit on a bus or at a chupa without a m’chitza?
September 11, 2012 3:53 pm at 3:53 pm #1066806popa_bar_abbaParticipantI’m sorry, is this mechitza thing you are all talking about related to the mechitza bpeh issue being debated in NYC right now? Is that somehow related to this shiur?
September 11, 2012 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm #1066807gavra_at_workParticipantPBA: Had the girls been behind a mechitza, would you have left?
September 11, 2012 4:24 pm at 4:24 pm #1066808popa_bar_abbaParticipantGavra:
Maybe not. But not because of the taaruvos aspect, but because then it could be that they are not really part of the shiur and are just listening in.
If they were behind the mechitza and participating by asking questions, I certainly would have left.
September 11, 2012 4:39 pm at 4:39 pm #1066809yichusdikParticipantpba – lol
September 11, 2012 4:46 pm at 4:46 pm #1066810☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMechitzah b’peh would be if you tell the women to leave.
In my neighborhood, two different magidei shiur were offered a well paying position to give a gemara shiur, but it was known that there was a woman who wanted to attend. Both asked their respective rebbeim, who both said the same thing; it might or might not be assur, but either way, don’t do it.
September 11, 2012 4:57 pm at 4:57 pm #1066811HealthParticipantSam2 -“Unless I am grossly misrecalling this, he doesn’t require a Mechitzah nor does he say that they can’t sit next to each other. (Maybe he is assuming that they already weren’t, but I don’t recall it saying that in the T’shuvah.)”
That’s exactly my point. He is assuming it, because if he held sitting next to or very near each other wasn’t Taaruvous -he’d say so!
In the olden times, well not that long ago, in the Frum world, not the MO world, Yeshiva dinners/ Chasunahs were almost all mixed. But people sat next to their wives, family, etc. Noone sat next to or very near, strange women/girls.
If you sit next to a strange girl/woman during a Torah Shiur, this is a classic case of “Mitzva Haboh B’aveira”!
September 11, 2012 5:17 pm at 5:17 pm #1066812gavra_at_workParticipantIf they were behind the mechitza and participating by asking questions, I certainly would have left.
What if they would have texted their questions on a Kosher phone? How about a non-Kosher phone?
Just trying to get to the bottom of this 🙂
September 11, 2012 11:29 pm at 11:29 pm #1066813Sam2ParticipantPBA: I don’t understand. You’re being Mocheh against someone holding like the Drisha?
September 11, 2012 11:41 pm at 11:41 pm #1066814popa_bar_abbaParticipantWhy, what does the drisha hold about mechitza bpeh?
September 12, 2012 12:01 am at 12:01 am #1066815☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhat if they would have texted their questions on a Kosher phone?
Isn’t that an oxymoron?
March 27, 2015 3:50 am at 3:50 am #1066816Patur Aval AssurParticipantI forget where it is, it’s towards the end of either O.C 2, 3, or 4
It’s in Yoreh Deiah 2:109:
??? ???? ????????? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ??? ?? ???????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ??????? ???? ??? ???? ????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ?? ???? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ?????? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ??? ??? ?????????? ??? ?? ????????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??????? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ???? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ??”? ??? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???????? ?? ??????
?????
??? ?????????
See also Orach Chaim 5:12:3 where he writes:
???? ?? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??????
????? ???? ?? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ??????? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ???? ??? ?? ?? ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ????
March 27, 2015 11:50 am at 11:50 am #1066817popa_bar_abbaParticipantI always thought drisha sounded a bit feminine.
Is this why that place in NYC where they are mevazeh Hashem is called drisha?
March 27, 2015 12:22 pm at 12:22 pm #1066818☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantNo, you’re just more used to hearing the word drisha about that place in the UWS so you think of it as feminine.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.