- This topic has 69 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by havesomeseichel.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2009 7:38 pm at 7:38 pm #589203Y.W. EditorKeymaster
How is everyone liking our new President?
Please comment respectfully.
[Please make sure to check the top “sticky” thread on the Coffee Room. Do NOT post comments here about that thread – JUST about the presidents performance in his first few days.]
January 25, 2009 7:40 pm at 7:40 pm #637922CuriousMemberAre you working for the Gallup poll?
January 25, 2009 7:40 pm at 7:40 pm #637923qwertyuiopMemberwell so far, i thimk he has been doing a pretty good job except for a few mistakes. but of course it is up to Hash-m.
January 25, 2009 7:40 pm at 7:40 pm #637924Itzik_sMemberBS”D
With all due respect, is it not a bit early to rate him?
However, based on the call made to Abbas ShR”Y, the planned closure of Guantanamo, the nasty and unprofessional reference to Rush Limbaugh, and his choice of Rahm Emanuel who made such a fool of himself at the inauguration, I would have to rate him a -5 on a scale of 1 to 10.
January 25, 2009 7:42 pm at 7:42 pm #637925Charles R. DarwinMemberA+
January 25, 2009 8:20 pm at 8:20 pm #637926asdfghjklParticipanti’ll give him a 1/2 a star so far….it’s not even a week yet!!!!
January 25, 2009 8:24 pm at 8:24 pm #637927syriansephardiMemberI think the world sees him as a movie star, not as a president!!! I do not like it!!!!!!
January 25, 2009 8:38 pm at 8:38 pm #637928asdfghjklParticipantsyriansephardi: i agree with ya!!!!!
is anyone collecting ll the newspaper articles of obama????
January 25, 2009 9:51 pm at 9:51 pm #637930oomisParticipantIt’s way too soon to assess his presidential skills. As far as I am concerned, the real test will come with how he reacts to the next Mid-East crisis. He has said he is dismantling “Gitmo,” but I have a feeling that many of the things he stood for while running his campaign, will of necessity have to be re-evaluated when he realizes what he is truly facing. I personally want to see him succeed. I did not vote for him, but I don’t want our country to be run by an incompetent leader, so I wish him hatzlacha in being the right shaliach for this country as well as for the benefit of E”Y.
January 25, 2009 9:52 pm at 9:52 pm #637931syriansephardiMemberAsdfghjkl what do u mean collecting the articles? And did u guys see the pictures in the news papers?! They seriously treat him like a movie star!! Its not normal. Well nothing about him becoming president was ‘normal’ but that’s a whole diff issue
January 25, 2009 10:32 pm at 10:32 pm #637932asdfghjklParticipantsyriansephardi: i collect newspaprer articles of big events, like the obama stuff, miricle on the hudson, sept. 11th articles, mumbai tragity……. yeah tread him like a movie star–crazy!!!
January 25, 2009 10:57 pm at 10:57 pm #637933redheadMemberAs to my opinion, he’s proven to be one of the worst presidents
Just like Itzik & syrian wrote.
Btw. The combination of him being a “proven” anti-semite, liberal & a movie star (as rush calls him the messiah) that cannot be or do anythimg wrong is very scary
January 25, 2009 11:03 pm at 11:03 pm #637935asdfghjklParticipantredhead: on behalf of the coffee room board, welcome to the coffee room!!! head to the new members thread to get a proper welcome!!!!
now back to mr. president obama……
January 25, 2009 11:06 pm at 11:06 pm #637936takingabreakParticipanti say that if he had class he would not have commented about ush, second that if bush had made a similar remark regarding listening to liberals they would have been screaming that he was trying to repress free speech
January 26, 2009 12:25 am at 12:25 am #637938moish01Memberi heard this a couple of weeks ago and i think it’s true.
Obama’s not going to be judged by the color of his skin. he’s going to be judged according to how well he fixes the economy.
which is all Americans really care about anyway. economy first. then maybe foreign affairs second.
haha “Obama” is not in my spell-check. guess he’s not chasuv enough yet.
January 26, 2009 12:32 am at 12:32 am #637939coke not pepsiMemberobama hey moish ur right hes not in mine either…back on topic -its been less then a week -theres no way u can know yet ,i hope hes good but it doesnt look like hes trying to be a respectable person hes trying to be chilled but thats not what we want from a pres
January 26, 2009 1:45 am at 1:45 am #637941isha kshairaMemberin just a few short days, Obama has proven to be a little kid from the country side who came to visit the big city. He is clueless of how to rule a great nation like ours. The decisions he has made proves him immature and incompetent. I only hope he doesn’t do irreparable damage. He surrounded himself with a bunch of clowns whom he’ll have a hard time controlling, and will have to spend numerous hours shushing them up. Obama is doing to the presidency of the USA, what Shabtai Zvi did to our Rabbanim in those days. May Hashem put his right hand over us, his children, so that President Barak Hussein Obama’s policies all fail!!! Amen!!!
January 26, 2009 2:09 am at 2:09 am #637942JosephParticipantHe has yet to perform.
January 26, 2009 2:09 am at 2:09 am #637943The Town CrierMemberI was very skeptical about him considering his lack of exposure and experience, but not discounting his education and brilliance.
Thus far he seems to have made only the best possible appointments and surrounded himself with some of the best and brightest cabinet members and administrators.
January 26, 2009 2:12 am at 2:12 am #637944yrosMemberhe spoke very well at the inaugeration. We shall see if he does what he says. I’m wandering, does anybody think it was a good idea to close down guantama bay?
January 26, 2009 2:22 am at 2:22 am #637945JosephParticipantTown Crier, spare us. You’ve more than made clear your left ideologies on the main yw board.
January 26, 2009 2:29 am at 2:29 am #637946yrosMembersince obama didn’t do much yet because he is only in office for less then a week, let’s talk about bush’s accomplishments. I think bush was a great president, what is the cr’s opinion on the matter?
January 26, 2009 2:41 am at 2:41 am #637948mw13ParticipantIgree with with Joseph – as of right now, Obama hasn’t done enough to get rated by. However, his cabinet appointments have B”H been fairly moderate, but I have a bad feeling about his emphasis on peace in the Middle East…
January 26, 2009 2:41 am at 2:41 am #637949lesschumrasParticipantI didn’t know the CR had created a satire thread! It must be that, since no serious person could possibly be evaluating a President after 1 week.
January 26, 2009 2:52 am at 2:52 am #637951qwertyuiopMemberlesschumras: i guess nobody in the CR is serious(except you).$
January 26, 2009 3:46 am at 3:46 am #637952The Town CrierMemberJoseph, i do not understand
January 26, 2009 3:55 am at 3:55 am #637953kiruvwifeMemberqwertyuiop-(your log in name is easier to type than I thought)–I’d like to think that I’m in the category of serious, so lesschumras has company….and i’m sure there are others that would fall into the realm of serious.
January 26, 2009 4:35 am at 4:35 am #637954syriansephardiMemberMoish: ppl are obsessed with obama BECAUSE of the color of his skin! Its their dream come true!!!
January 26, 2009 5:32 am at 5:32 am #637955asdfghjklParticipantkiruvwife: not too many others fall into your category in the cr!!!!
January 26, 2009 5:41 am at 5:41 am #637956anon for thisParticipantThe Town Crier (or anyone else who’d care to answer),
What do you think of Obama’s “Team of Rivals” approach? Do you think appointing his political opponents to important positions (Biden as vice-president, Clinton as Secretary of State) will ultimately serve him, and the country, well?
January 26, 2009 5:56 am at 5:56 am #637957qwertyuiopMemberkiruvwife: i guess you didn’t realize that i was being sarcastic.$(i am serious sometimes though, but usually not.$)
January 26, 2009 7:00 am at 7:00 am #637958JosephParticipantanon – Many past President’s have done so. i.e. Reagan appointed his political opponent Bush (Sr.) as his running mate/V.P.
January 26, 2009 2:18 pm at 2:18 pm #637960kiruvwifeMemberqwertyuiop—I did sense some sarcasm, but have a tendency to respond despite it…
on the topic of this thread, is the president being asked to be evaluated based on his performance of speechmaking, popularity, getting things accomplished, or an overall assessment of one week on the job? don’t feel there is enough to go on just yet. my approach is sometimes aniticipation to see what Hashem wants to let him (obama) do.
January 26, 2009 2:51 pm at 2:51 pm #637961anon for thisParticipantJoseph,
Yes, but most presidents don’t appoint political opponents to their cabinets, especially to prominent/ powerful positions like Sec of State. Generally speaking, the vice-president is not a politically powerful position, though it can be a springboard for a future presidential run. In recent years, a presidential candidate’s selection of a running mate has become opportunity to broaden one’s demographic/ political appeal (see John McCain & Sarah Palin). Thus choosing one’s former political rival as a running mate is a practical move that can help a candidate achieve a win that otherwise wouldn’t have been possible. There is no similar political advantage to appointing a competitor to a Cabinet position.
How many presidents since Lincoln have appointed a bitter political oppponent to an important Cabinet position, as President Obama appointed Ms. Clinton?
January 26, 2009 4:12 pm at 4:12 pm #637962The Town CrierMemberClinton and Gore were rivals, Reagan and Bush were rivals…
January 26, 2009 4:13 pm at 4:13 pm #637963The Town CrierMemberAnon, here’s some simple American History. did you know that there were not always “tickets” in the presidential elections? Once upon a time, the second place winner in the presidential election became the vice president. that means the president had to work with his opponent who came in second to him and had to be his vice president. (lhavdil, the type of coalition building that takes place evertytime there is an israeli election)
January 26, 2009 4:29 pm at 4:29 pm #637964anon for thisParticipantThe Town Crier,
I did know that the second place winner used to be the vice-president. But in more recent times, presidential candidates have chosen running mates to broaden their appeal (as I stated above) and thus their electability. This has, as you & Joseph have noted, led to candidates choosing former rivals as running mates. But this wasn’t the case for President Obama’s choice of Ms. Clinton as Sec of State (one of the most powerful cabinet positions), since he’d already been elected at that point. Again, which presidents in recent times do you know of who’ve done this?
January 26, 2009 5:14 pm at 5:14 pm #637965Mayan_DvashParticipantWhat I see is a man ruling by fiat. He makes his wishes happen by issuing executive orders. Had a Republican do that the media would call him/her a despot.
January 26, 2009 7:20 pm at 7:20 pm #637966MoshejoeMemberI’d give him a C- for his performance thus far. However, if you compare him to Bush, he gets a A++.
January 26, 2009 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm #637967The Town CrierMemberMayan thats funny especially cuz some of obama’s executive orders was to overturn some of Bush’s executive orders!
Bush himself issued like 300 executive orders
January 26, 2009 9:04 pm at 9:04 pm #637968squeakParticipant…and if you’re comparing to Bush’s performance, C- is a pretty familiar GPA.
January 26, 2009 9:11 pm at 9:11 pm #637969mazal77ParticipantI did like former president Bush. Mr Obama is overturning everything he has put in place. The fact that he is closing quantanomo bay, does not sit well with me. I think he is taking a soft stance on the security of the U.S. to appease the Arabs. His choice of cabinet members are not very good. I mean George Mitchell, who is in favor of a 2 state Israel?? and Hillary Clinton??
January 26, 2009 9:17 pm at 9:17 pm #637970areivimzehlazehParticipantI (think)I’m with Joseph on this one. I may be the only one to have correctly interpreted what he meant when saying “He has yet to perform.”
Joseph- you didn’t mean it’s too soon to judge, am I right?
January 26, 2009 9:35 pm at 9:35 pm #637971Yanky55ParticipantDid anybody read the op-ed in the NY Times written by William Kristol where he writes that as an American Jew he believes we all should have much hakoras hatov towards George Bush for being the best president we ever had, as far as Israel and Jews in general are concerned?
January 27, 2009 12:42 am at 12:42 am #637972qwertyuiopMemberkiruvwife: don’t worry, i’m not insulted.$
January 27, 2009 12:45 am at 12:45 am #637973JosephParticipantareivim – correct.
January 27, 2009 1:28 am at 1:28 am #637974isha kshairaMemberwhy do you think it’s too early to rate President Obama, the liberal media started rating bush 43 before he came into office and they gave him an F!! At any rate, what you see about obama is what you will get, he started down a certain path and there is no point of return, so we know where he’s headed to and we can therfore rate him. I give him an F.
And about his brilliance, i haven’t seen it yet, if anything all i’ve seen is pure stupidity, starting up with a person like rush limbaugh who has 20 million listeners every day, while obama who was making history once in his life had 1 million people at his inaugaration.
Obama is bad for the USA, just like Jimmy Carter was!!
January 27, 2009 3:27 am at 3:27 am #637975mw13Participant“Yes, but most presidents don’t appoint political opponents to their cabinets, especially to prominent/ powerful positions like Sec of State. Generally speaking, the vice-president is not a politically powerful position, though it can be a springboard for a future presidential run. In recent years, a presidential candidate’s selection of a running mate has become opportunity to broaden one’s demographic/ political appeal (see John McCain & Sarah Palin). Thus choosing one’s former political rival as a running mate is a practical move that can help a candidate achieve a win that otherwise wouldn’t have been possible. There is no similar political advantage to appointing a competitor to a Cabinet position.”
anon, cabinet positions can (and are) often used as bargaining chips in behind the scenes political deals. Clinton was damaging Obama’s chances of becoming president, and she would never quit just to help him out.
January 27, 2009 8:10 pm at 8:10 pm #637977isha kshairaMemberobama oppointed clinton and all his competitors for his own good, so that he could at least have a united democratic party. the democrats were divided between hillary and obama, so that’s why.
Obama surrounded himself with a bunch of clowns like joe biden and rahm emanuel, I don’t understand why he chose joe biden (who is convinced he’s so smart and we are all a bunch of dummies)because if by the time joe biden finishes his first term – in four years, he’ll be ready for the nursing home. Joe biden will do a lot of damage to the obama administration. I wonder whether obama won’t dismiss him before the term is over, i have a feeling he will.
January 27, 2009 8:33 pm at 8:33 pm #637978areivimzehlazehParticipantJoseph- do we understand each other or what 😉
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.