- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by .
-
Posts
-
Is it possible to institute a qualifying critical reading, writing, and logic test before one is permitted a username in the CR to help maintain the quality of the discussions?
So often the discussions spiral out of control into personal attacks and “arguments” so ridiculous and fact-ignorant, they don’t justify responses. The original intent of the OP inevitably gets lost in translation, and essentially the thread becomes moot while everybody and nobody at the same time were able to exchange opinions.
Opinions?
Rabble Rabble Rabble…
No. I will not tolerate an honest level-headed discussion. This is what makes it so lively here!
My greatest pleasure is watching two obstinate people arguing, knowing that one is “akshan” is going to have to loose. Utter joy!!
It’s the second law of thermodynamics…things tend towards entropy. Godwin’s law is just another version of this.
I like that “Godwin’s law”. He does. G-D ALWAYS WINS. ??? ?’ ????? ?????.
I like that “Godwin’s law”. He does. G-D ALWAYS WINS. ??? ?’ ????? ?????.
Based on the criteria in the OP, no response is justified.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.