To be honest, I consider myself more tolerant than most, particularly when it comes to controversial and difficult topics. So I won’t ask how this treatise on something that’s dangerously close to devil worship, and reads more like a shabby conspiracy theory than any kind of reasoned argument, got past the mods. I’ll simply say that, even with the closing statements contextualising the post, it’s a pretty ridiculous premise, even in a quasi-serious fashion. The man’s a clown, and to accuse him of having some kind of symbolic adherence to ‘The Number of the Beast’, incidentally an entirely Christian notion, is giving him far too much credit. I’m surprised the Illuminati didn’t show up at some point. Or perhaps I need to wait for Part 3 for that, possibly subtitled ‘Trump and the Magic Golden Hair’.
As for the ‘facts’ in the OP, I doubt they stand up to any scrutiny. Due to these and other reasons, I’ll assume the OP is making a clever, sarcastic dig at conspiracy theorists. Otherwise, I don’t know what constitutes a strong enough response, but this isn’t it.