- This topic has 14 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 7 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
I find it troubling that poster here inadvertently or otherwise will present a psak on any number of issues. With all due respect to YWN, this is not the place to do so unless it is unaccompanied with a link to a reliable source. This is not an attack on free speech, but without knowing who is reading this, there may be those who will accept what is written though the psak may have been given in a specific situation or the poster misinterpreted the halachah. So May I suggest that YWN edit those posts without supporting links and those that declare others sinners based on their understanding of an issue.
You’re a sinner.
Please…
What fun is the CR if declaring others sinners is verboten?
I’m more interested in having the Mods divulge when they’re finally going to publish SHU”T of the CR?
With haskamos of all our favorite posters…
It’s muttar to virtually paken for the masses.
What level of pesak do you consider paskening?
Ifo somebody wants to know the beracha on apples should I avoid paskening?
applesauce?
eaten during meal? after meal?
At what level is it to complicated for the coffee room
Of course, answering my question(s) would be paskening too. so tread lightly
I still recall with great trepidation the time I was called upon by a fellow coffee room poster to pasken whether to put someone on a respirator.
Flatbusher – Out of interest – What disturbed you one hour ago that didn’t disturb you for the past 9 years?
Joseph raises another point.
I dont know the specifics of the question he is reffering to. But am certain as learned as any poster here thinks Joseph may be nobody was actually asking a halachic question regardign putting somebody on a respirator.
We all have an inate “halachic sense” most of us know what questions can be answered by aybody what requires a more learned person and what requires a Gadol. The idea that every question (eg Bracha on apples) needs to be addressed to a Gadol or even Rav is foolsihness.
It is clear in most threads when more invvolved questions are asked rarely (if ever) is the pesron actually asking and looking for guidance, rather it is usually to stimulate conversation (or argument).
Sources have been brought. You choose to ignore them.
If someone poskins Halacha from Joseph, they must be a averich of the Rebbe of Chelm
You are now admitting that movies are assur, but you somehow want a pass because other people do other issurim? How does that work – can I be mechallel Shabbos because some people are rotzchim?
Again with the false internet analogy? Are you going to claim that it too was never answered? It’s just a desperate attempt to discredit someone you are debating, but has no validity in the discussion.
BTW, I wasn’t referring to the Mogen Avraham, I was referring to sources (which have been quoted numerous times here, including in discussions you were involved in) which were based on content in media.
flatbusher:
… there may be those who will accept what is written though the psak may have been given in a specific situation or the poster misinterpreted the halachah
Interesting that it bother you so that people will accept a ??? that is ?????? “without proof”. What’s the worst that can happen – a guy won’t watch a movie even though it may be muttar?
Your original post claimed you are worried that posters misinterpret the halachah. Now [here] you have a problem that there may be poskim who are mattir, and therefore it isn’t fair to only bring down the machmirim?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.