- This topic has 15 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 1 month ago by .
-
Posts
-
Who is the better president for his country – Obama for America or Putin for Russia?
Consider:
Putin outmaneuvered Obama on Ukraine after Obama supported the coup d’etat against the elected government of Ukraine.
Putin outmaneuvered Obama on Syria.
Obama backed down from his “red lines” on Syria.
Putin’s military actions in Syria achieved their objectives and did not end in the quagmire Obama predicted.
Obama stood by as Syrian civilians were massacred.
Obama’s baby is the Islamic State as result of his unilateral withdrawal from Iraq and inaction in Syria when he refused to assist the rebels.
none
It depends on what you mean by “better.” If you mean advancing his country’s interests in foreign affairs, even if those interests are evil, then Putin.
If you mean better in the moral sense for his country, then Obama.
For example:
Obama stood by as Syrian civilians were massacred = Bad
Putin aided the Syrian government in massacring its civilians = Worse
Obama negotiating nuclear treaty with Iran and lifting sanctions = Bad
Putin giving them nuclear technology and missiles = Worse
Joe -“Who is the better president for his country – Obama for America or Putin for Russia”
Obama is an extreme leftist – so if you’re also like that you’ll love him!
But a lot citizens are more in the middle or on the right.
It’s a shame that we don’t have a guy like Putin running our country!
First of all, I don’t think you realize how evil Assad has been. Although in the long run, ISIS in Syria might be worse, Assad has tortured and killed even more Syrian civilians. The US should have intervened on behalf of the Free Syrian army right away and although the FSA has committed atrocities also, they are not in the same league as Assad and ISIS. Furthermore, Russia should (and falsely claimed they would) stop Assad from bombing (including chemically) civilians, but Russia has not stopped them but helped them.
I think that Obama was morally weak on Syria, he failed to do the right thing and the Syrian population is suffering because of it. Russia went ahead and deliberately did the wrong thing. Obama was shev v’al taaseh, Russia was kum v’aseh.
On Iran, that Russia has been bad for a while isn’t an excuse for them to continue to be bad. Putin is actively selling Iran missiles and nuclear tech. Russia is now allied (in the practical sense) with Iran and Assad (Assad is backed by Iran).
On Ukraine, I didn’t know that Obama was involved in the coup. I have to look into it more. Other than taking Crimea by force, what Putin done to outdo Obama.
Most importantly, from a moral perspective, Putin has made himself a dictator, he assassinates journalists and other who criticize him, and he has crackeddown on the fredom his peoplel
Putin OBVIOUSLY!!!
What has Obama done for the country in a positive way? NOTHING!!!
What will Hillary do for us positive? NOTHING!!!
Putin is a better president for Russia because Russia is an undemocratic dictatorship, and he is very undemocratic and dictatorial. So, that said, is this the stupidest issue ever addressed on YWN?
To bention: How many journalists and opposition politicians should Putin kill before you consider him worse than Obama, who (with lots of help) killed Bin Laden, John Boehner and the US generals (except for Boehner and the generals).
Obama could not fix the country after the Reflublicans ruined it!
Putin is for sure better for HIS country than B.H.Obama is for our country.
To Huju : How many journalists and opposition politicians should the Clintons’ kill before you consider them worse than Obama, who (with lots of help) killed Bin Laden?
To Health: I already consider the Clintons worse than Obama, so they do not have to kill anybody. And as far as I know, they have not done so. The harder question would be, how many journalists and opposition politicians would the Clintons have to kill before I would vote for Trump over Hillary? I won’t think about that question until I have to, i.e., until Bill or Hill kills someone. And in about a month, the question will become moot.
huju -“And as far as I know, they have not done so.”
You’re in disagreement with a lot of people! Take for example V. Foster.
Don’t live in a fantasy world!
To Health: Oh, yeah, I forgot the Clintons killed Vince Foster (who was not a journalist or opposition politician, so he does not count). But the investigators never found any evidence that the Clintons killed Vince Foster. So I guess that makes them smart.
Huju -“But the investigators never found any evidence that the Clintons killed Vince Foster. So I guess that makes them smart.”
She did not kill him directly, but she caused his death!
Why do DemonCrats distort the truth and protect their Avodah Zora – the Clintons?!?
Do you really want such a person as our president?!?
This article makes e/o understand why embarrassing s/o is equalvalent to killing them!
From the Washington Times: (Not the National Enquirer)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.