NY is #1

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee NY is #1

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #605461
    Health
    Participant

    That right – NY is the first State to have a lawsuit against religious people because they refuse to have a Toeiva wedding on their farm. Thank you Cuomo the H–O and all those that voted for the leftist libs in the NY State Gov.

    #900717

    You sound surprised. Welcome to N.Y.

    #900718
    WIY
    Member

    Who made it illegal to refuse someone to get married on your farm because their marriage/lifestyle doesn’t fit with your religious beliefs?

    #900719
    Health
    Participant

    chassidishY.U.type – “Welcome to N.Y.”

    Sorry, I live in Jersey. But we aren’t far behind when it comes to Prustkeit. And I’m not the least bit surprised.

    #900720
    yehudayona
    Participant

    Wrong. There was another case in Vermont. The Wildflower Inn had to pay a hefty fine. They no longer host weddings of any persuasion.

    #900721
    Health
    Participant

    yehudayona – I’m not wrong. I doubt the case in Vermont was a case of religious freedom. In other words, why didn’t they allow the wedding? Because they didn’t want to expose their kids to it, like the farm or because they were personally against it. While I wish the law let anybody against it discriminate, but then that law wouldn’t be much of a law. So I understand the law and the lawsuit in Vermont, but I don’t understand a law that stops religious freedom like by the farm in NY. And how could anybody “Frum” vote for any politician who supported this law? What did they think – that religious people wouldn’t be persecuted once this law was enacted?

    #900722
    yehudayona
    Participant

    Health, instead of assuming, you could look it up. There’s an interesting twist in the Wildflower Inn case. The owners are Catholic, and they are personally against gay marriage because of their religious convictions. Their lawyer says their policy was to reveal their religious beliefs to potential customers, but to agree to host all kinds of weddings anyway so as to be in compliance with the law (and in fact, in a 2005 case, they did this, and the state said it was OK). However, one of their (now former) employees told the couple in question that they would not allow the wedding because of the owners’ beliefs. Presumably, the reason they settled the case is that it would have been too costly to fight it in the courts.

    #900723
    akuperma
    Participant

    1. If they have a commercial “wedding venue” that isn’t tied to a single religion, I could imagine how that would violate the discrimnation law.

    2. Maryland is both super-blue, but much less hostile towards religion. I suspect it is because the the Maryland Democratic party is heavily dependent on the state’s socially conservative African American community, whereas New York’s Democrats are dominated by “frei” Jews and a much more ethnically diverse crowd, none of which are especially known for their religious piety.

    #900724

    @Akuperma

    Dont forget the holy people who will vote for whomever as long as the $$$ keep rolling in.

    #900725
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    @ Crisis,

    What does your comment have to do with the topic at hand? Was it just an opportunity to make a thinly veiled hateful remark?

    #900726
    akuperma
    Participant

    crisisoftheweek:

    I tend to believe that in many places outside New York, the Democrats are afraid that if they alienate the “holy people” they might not be able to permanently buy their support. In fact, that may be true in New York as well (considering two recent wins for Republicans in super-blue Brooklyn – you do know that Dodgers/Met “blue” is the official borough color).

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.