Home › Forums › In The News › Nuclear Weapons Lab Missing 67 Computers
- This topic has 8 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by areivimzehlazeh.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 12, 2009 3:19 am at 3:19 am #589376Y.W. EditorKeymaster
Just saw the following on the Fox News website. Insane.
The Los Alamos nuclear weapons laboratory in New Mexico is missing 67 computers, including 13 that were lost or stolen in the past year. Officials say no classified information has been lost.
The watchdog group Project on Government Oversight on Wednesday released a memo dated Feb. 3 from the Energy Department’s National Nuclear Security Administration outlining the loss of the computers.
Kevin Roark, a spokesman for Los Alamos, on Wednesday confirmed the computers were missing and said the lab was initiating a monthlong inventory to account for every computer. He said the computers were a cybersecurity issue because they may contain personal information like names and addresses, but they did not contain any classified information.
Thirteen of the missing computers were lost or stolen in the past 12 months, including three computers that were taken from a scientist’s home in Santa Fe, N.M., on Jan. 16, and a BlackBerry belonging to another employee was lost “in a sensitive foreign country,” according to the memo and an e-mail from a senior lab manager.
The e-mail was also released by the watchdog group.
The theft of the three computers in January triggered the inventory and a review of the lab’s policies regarding home use of government computers, Roark said.
Only one of the three computers stolen from the employee’s home was authorized for home use, which raised concerns “as to whether we were fully complying with our own policies for offsite computer usage,” he said.
Roark said computers with classified information are “kept completely separate from unclassified computing.”
“None of these systems constitute a breach of a classified system,” he said.
The e-mail from Los Alamos senior manager Stephen Blair to lab co-workers said the missing computers and Blackberry were “garnering a great deal of attention with senior management as well as (nuclear security administration) representatives.”
The security administration memo said the “magnitude of exposure and risk to the laboratory is at best unclear as little data on these losses has been collected or pursued given their treatment as property management issues.”
The lab, located in Los Alamos, N.M., employs about 10,000 people.
February 12, 2009 3:26 am at 3:26 am #637356flatbush27Member“Officials say no classified information has been lost.The lab, located in Los Alamos, N.M., employs about 10,000 people. “
out of 10,000 workers things get stolen by the workers themselves and they probably cant possibly steal the classified info containing computers because its too hard with the security ( i’m not talking about the computers stolen out of that guys house and i wrote this with the edit button that i got for like the third time!)
February 12, 2009 3:42 am at 3:42 am #637357havesomeseichelMemberWhy do these things keep happening in classified security areas? Big government cannot provide the proper oversight to be able to manage and control top security concerns. This cannot go on…
February 12, 2009 5:01 am at 5:01 am #637358syriansephardiMemberAh scary!!
February 12, 2009 5:58 am at 5:58 am #637359asdfghjklParticipantwow that’s nuts!!!
February 12, 2009 8:22 am at 8:22 am #637360kapustaParticipantthats just wierd! 67? funny number… maybe its due to the recession, people need to catch up on their ma’aser (excuse my very very very lame humor, its all I have for right now)
February 12, 2009 7:20 pm at 7:20 pm #637361teenMemberhahaha i burst out laughing when i read this…how do 67 computers go missing from a nuclear facility???? in a minute ill probably stop laughing and start crying…
February 12, 2009 7:41 pm at 7:41 pm #637362areivimzehlazehParticipantHiroshima, Nagasaki here we come…
Complete insanity- you’d think the security was slightly tighter than this- no?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.