Home › Forums › Family Matters › Mrs. Husband Name
- This topic has 46 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 6 months ago by shteig.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 25, 2012 8:05 am at 8:05 am #606552ChulentMember
What is the reason a wife is formally known as Mrs. Chaim Cohen? (IOW, Mrs. Husband Name.) Aside from this being the formal title of a wife, it is probably most commonly seen when wedding invitations are sent out and addressed to “Mr. & Mrs. Chaim Cohen”. (Note that the wife’s first name is omitted.)
As a side point, I was also wondering about the introduction of the Choson and Kallah when they first come into the reception hall after the Chupa. Someone will announce “We welcome for the very first time… Mr. & Mrs. Chaim Cohen!” Does the “minhag” of this public introduction of the groom and bride come from secular weddings? Cause as I understand that is how the couples are introduced at gentile weddings.
November 25, 2012 2:49 pm at 2:49 pm #909638icedMemberMisses means wife of. So Mr. Chaim Cohen’s wife is called Mrs. Chaim Cohen.
November 25, 2012 2:51 pm at 2:51 pm #909639WIYMemberChulent
Yes the announcing is likely a “goyishe zach” as well as all the music intros which are taken straight from non Jewish music rock and roll…
Proposing is also not a Jewish thing. Maybe you can find someone to make a list of all the things we took from the non Jewish wotld….
November 25, 2012 3:23 pm at 3:23 pm #909640Torah613TorahParticipantI plan to keep my maiden name if I continue to be professionally active, but my married name in all other ways.
You’ve brought up a topic that feminists won’t like. I personally have no problem with it. Then again, I am not a feminist.
November 25, 2012 5:18 pm at 5:18 pm #909641haifagirlParticipant“We welcome for the very first time… Mr. & Mrs. Chaim Cohen!”
You can be sure, if I ever get married, that won’t happen. I find that introduction quite annoying.
November 26, 2012 2:23 am at 2:23 am #909642anonymrsParticipantmost of our invitations say “mr. and mrs. yyy and xxx lastname”….
November 26, 2012 3:23 am at 3:23 am #909643WiseyParticipantThe announcing itself I find quite goyish and disgusting but the “Mr. and Mrs. Chaim Cohen” seems like a tznius way to avoid calling a married woman by her first name.
November 26, 2012 7:49 am at 7:49 am #909644PosterMemberIn terms of mail, I think it’s done that way bec it is easier.
November 26, 2012 1:12 pm at 1:12 pm #909645icedMemberIt has long been considered proper etiquette in society to refer to a wife as Mrs. Chaim Cohen.
November 26, 2012 1:51 pm at 1:51 pm #909646akupermaParticipantIt’s the way the English and Americans do things, and in their countries it is useful to follow their minhagim. Traditionally, Ashkenazi Jews didn’t have surnames, and both men and women always went by their patronymic (Piloni/Pilonis Ben/Bat Piloni). At this point almost all rabbanim have adopted the custom, so it is mutar (similar to males wearing pants, which once were a goyish minhag, but eventually were adopted and now almost all rabbanim wear them).
November 26, 2012 2:26 pm at 2:26 pm #909647The little I knowParticipantIf the bills bear his name, should not the invitations?
November 26, 2012 3:53 pm at 3:53 pm #909648Bubby BParticipantI do not see what is wrong with letters or invitations being addressed to Mr.& Mrs. that is how it is in the world we live in, or introducing a new couple, “for the first time as Mr.&Mrs.”, on the contrary it is a celebratory message, if anyone would make an issue, I think it would be more with the Hebrew/Yiddish referral on the invitation “Uriso”, which to me sounds much more like the woman being the shlep along (pardon me if I am wrong, I do not know where or why this began, or if has any Halachic source. For that matter I think Mar & Maras sounds better than “uriso”, if indeed some feel it’s a lack of tznius to mention the woman’s name, though I don’t understand it. In Tanach numerous women’s names are mentioned. Do our invitations have to be holier than the Tanach?? Please note also a friend/relative of “Mrs.” who knows her more than the husband may not even realize who the invitation is from – especially with a name like Cohen, and having the woman’s first name might clarify the experience for some.
November 26, 2012 5:28 pm at 5:28 pm #909649farrocksMemberI think it would be more with the Hebrew/Yiddish referral on the invitation “Uriso”, which to me sounds much more like the woman being the shlep along (pardon me if I am wrong, I do not know where or why this began, or if has any Halachic source. For that matter I think Mar & Maras sounds better than “uriso”, if indeed some feel it’s a lack of tznius to mention the woman’s name, though I don’t understand it.
Uriso (after her husband’s name) is the proper Jewish way to refer to a wife.
Which is why, for example, Chasuna invitations utilize that language.
November 26, 2012 7:02 pm at 7:02 pm #909650computer777ParticipantUriso (after her husband’s name) is the proper Jewish way to refer to a wife.
What makes it proper? Can you bring a source?
November 26, 2012 8:20 pm at 8:20 pm #909651oomisParticipantI am with Bubby B. I agree with her entire post
I have no problem with the expression “u’ra-ah-yaso” per se, but the chosson and kallah were not born in a vacuum. There is nothing inherently untznisudig in mentioning the mothers’ names. IMO in this specific isntance, it is only untzniusdig if you THINK it to be so, and I think we are going a little overboard in this, when we talk about a simple invitation (whioch does not even have a picture of the wife on it), which clearly comes from both the father AND the mother. Just my opinion. Please do not shoot the messenger.
November 26, 2012 9:04 pm at 9:04 pm #909652icedMemberOomis: What did you print on your children’s invitations for the parent’s names? How about your own wedding invitation?
November 27, 2012 12:27 am at 12:27 am #909653farrocksMemberAs a geder for tznius, many people will not call their wife by her first name when non-immediate family members are in the vicinity.
November 27, 2012 1:06 am at 1:06 am #909654yehudayonaParticipantfarrocks, what do they call their wives in such situations?
November 27, 2012 1:43 am at 1:43 am #909655farrocksMemberMy Rov zt’l, an tzadik and old time European Rov, used to call her as “herr nur”.
November 27, 2012 2:02 am at 2:02 am #909656JustLogicMemberYou’ll get over it…
November 27, 2012 3:05 am at 3:05 am #909657Torah613TorahParticipantFarrock – I just found out why my parents call each other Abba and Mommy.
November 27, 2012 3:15 am at 3:15 am #909658farrocksMemberThe idea is anything but new.
November 27, 2012 5:21 pm at 5:21 pm #909659yehudayonaParticipanttorah613, please ask them what they called each other before they had children.
November 28, 2012 12:37 am at 12:37 am #909660JustHavingFunParticipantIt’s more awkward when the wife is a professional and her hubby is not: Mr. & Dr. Chaim Cohen (as I’ve seen too often) is plain wrong.
Should be Mr. Chaim and Dr. Chaya Cohen or Mr. Chaim Cohen and Dr. Chaya Levy. Or what about just Chaim and Chaya?
November 28, 2012 12:49 am at 12:49 am #909661SJSinNYCMemberWomen should not be seen, heard, nor spoken about.
November 28, 2012 4:18 am at 4:18 am #909662EnglishmanMemberJHF: It should still remain Reb Chaim Cohen Uriso (or Mr. & Mrs. Chaim Cohen, if in English.)
November 28, 2012 6:28 am at 6:28 am #909663WolfishMusingsParticipantIt should still remain Reb Chaim Cohen Uriso
What if I’m not a Kohen or my last name is Uriso? :p
The Wolf
November 28, 2012 6:29 am at 6:29 am #909664WolfishMusingsParticipantmany people will not call their wife by her first name when non-immediate family members are in the vicinity.
Heck, I once had someone try to convince me that it was wrong to call my wife by her first name even when we were alone.
No, I didn’t listen to him.
The Wolf
November 28, 2012 2:49 pm at 2:49 pm #909665interjectionParticipant“Mr. & Dr. Chaim Cohen (as I’ve seen too often) is plain wrong.”
I am sorry that you find it strange.
November 28, 2012 7:09 pm at 7:09 pm #909666gavra_at_workParticipantWomen should not be seen, heard, nor spoken about.
None the less, you are a sight for sore eyes! (Although Ittisa says she hears from you now & then).
November 28, 2012 7:11 pm at 7:11 pm #909667gavra_at_workParticipantfarrocks, what do they call their wives in such situations?
I was going to add, but this is a family site. I’ll just keep quiet.
November 28, 2012 7:24 pm at 7:24 pm #909668crdleMemberIt’s Uraa’yaso, not uriso!??????, which means in Hebrew ( not yiddish) his wife!
November 28, 2012 8:51 pm at 8:51 pm #909669dolphinaMemberWomen (aka non-males) are an urban legend. They don’t exist. So all you males (aka non-females) can go back to learning or working or drinking tea or whatever you do, and stop worrying about what women wear or if they do or should drive, or if you can say their names, or if you can shake their hands or talk to them, or if they should go outside. They don’t exist. These discussions are all narishkeit and bitul torah. Moving on…..
November 29, 2012 12:02 am at 12:02 am #909671SJSinNYCMemberGAW, I took a long break from here. I found it wasn’t good for my opinion of Yeshivish people. Luckily, I know some awesome Yeshivish people in real life.
November 29, 2012 2:53 am at 2:53 am #909672đ«Syag LchochmaParticipantSJSinNYC – Real yeshivish people don’t post here. It’s mostly impersonators out to make them look bad. And doing well, I must say, but the opposition doesn’t come out too impressive either. I used to go nuts, now I try to pity them and move on.
Been choosing my real life friends more selectively too and life has certainly improved.
(musser zogger not excluded)
November 29, 2012 3:04 am at 3:04 am #909673farrocksMemberBeen choosing my real life friends more selectively too and life has certainly improved.
Been dumping friends that don’t measure up?
November 29, 2012 5:29 am at 5:29 am #909674đ«Syag LchochmaParticipantI didn’t say SORTING THROUGH, I said choosing.
November 29, 2012 6:09 am at 6:09 am #909675JustHavingFunParticipantI am sorry that you find it strange.
Thank you for your sympathy, “interjection.” as a professional editor and all around perfect person, I know what all styles should be. And I know what Wolfish Musings should have called his wife in private instead of her first name. But – moving on – she is not Dr. Chaim Cohen. Sheesh. You’d think a yid would give a poor muddle-headed female some credit for going to med school. All them difficult words to scribble on teeny pieces of paper. And sick people! Yuck! I’d rather stick with contaminated keyboards and missssplleded werdz.
Now for something completely different:
My first name is really ??????!
November 29, 2012 9:18 am at 9:18 am #909676SJSinNYCMemberI know Syag, real Yeshivish people wouldn’t have internet or would ONLY use it for work. But sometimes, its hard to separate.
November 29, 2012 1:45 pm at 1:45 pm #909677đ«Syag LchochmaParticipantwhy did that long post get approved before my teeny tiny one?
Because it was on the first page.
May 1, 2019 7:17 pm at 7:17 pm #1721927JosephParticipantDaf ahl Daf (Berachos 27b): In Minhag Yisroel Torah (O.C. 240:1) he notes that the Minhagei Maharil states, âThat when Mahari Segel spoke about his wife with other he would say in German, âMein hoiz frauâ (my house wife) as we see in Shabbos (118b) that he never called his wife âmy wifeâ but rather said âmy homeâ). Rashi there says it was because she was the principle member of the home. When he would call her he would say in German âhert ihr nitâ, which is the accepted practice in the world that husband and wife donât mention their spouses name.â This that the Maharil did not say âmy wifeâ when speaking in the presence of others or use her name, see Magid Taâaluma, âRegarding Berachos (27b) where Râ Eliezar ben Azarya said, âI will go and consult with the members of my householdâ and he went and consulted with his wife. This informs us that it is not correct to mention his wifeâs name before others and therefore he referred to as âmy householdâ when he meant his wife.â However this that the Maharil was careful not to call his wife at all by her name, see Redak (Lech Lecha) who notes the change in description. For Avraham it says, Your name will no longer be called Avraham while for Sarah it says, âYou should no longer call her name Sarai.â That is because a man calls his wife by her name but the wife doesnât call her husband by his name but rather in a respectful manner that reflects authority. (See Toldos Kol Aryeh who brings many sources for this).
May 1, 2019 8:47 pm at 8:47 pm #1721957JosephParticipantShabbos (118b): Râ Yossi said, I have never called my wife âmy wifeâ or my ox âmy oxâ, but rather I called my wife âmy homeâ and my ox â I called âmy field.â
Rashi (Gittin 52a): I called my wife my home â that is because all the necessities of the home are done through her and thus she is the main entity of the home. Similarly the ox is the main part of the field.
Meiri (Shabbos 118b): A person should always use refined language. An example is that one talmid chachom said, âI never call my wife âmy wifeâ nor my ox âmy oxâ. Rather I call my wife âmy homeâ and my ox âmy field.â
Daf ahl Daf (Shabbos 118b): … The reason why he always referred to his wife as âmy homeâ is because all the honor of the woman is to be inside (Tehilim 45) and it is not the manner for a woman to go out of the house. Therefore she is the principle member of the home and that is why he called her âmy home.â
May 6, 2019 12:24 am at 12:24 am #1723371WolfishMusingsParticipantWell, I tried to convince my wife to go by Mrs. Husband Name.
She refused.
She pointed out that my first name isn’t “Husband” and my last name isn’t “Name.”
I couldn’t really argue against that…
The Wolf
May 6, 2019 10:15 am at 10:15 am #1723531akupermaParticipant“Mrs.” followed by husbands name reflected the husband higher legal status, e.g. if he was an duke, she was a duchess only by virtue of being married to him. Such titles, along with a woman adopting her husbands surname, reflect usage among the Christians in general, and the British in particular. Traditionally, Jewish women did not adopt a husband’s name but were known as “Pilonis bas Piloni” where “Piloni” was her patronymic (her father’s name). In the 19th century the governments made us adopt their form of names in order to make it easiet to tax and conscript us.
May 6, 2019 10:21 am at 10:21 am #1723552GadolhadorahParticipantAs several others have noted, its entirely up to the woman as to how she wishes to be referenced since its NOT an inyan of halacha. Many frum young women who continue their professional careers after a chasanah will continue to go keep their own names for work but use their husband’s name in certain matters (e.g. wedding invitations, birth announcements etc.) for reasons of shalom bayis or to avoid offending their machatonim. Whatever works is fine.
May 6, 2019 11:29 am at 11:29 am #1723568JosephParticipantGHD: Why do you suppose that it might enhance the Shalom Bayis to use the traditional Mrs. Husband rather than her own name?
May 6, 2019 12:08 pm at 12:08 pm #1723579shteigParticipantNot uriso, or uraĂĄyaso, but veraĂĄyaso.
Curious as to how you were pronouncing it, though.
On another note, if I am not mistaken the women-folk on Rav Moshe Feinstein’s wedding invitation were named and not “vera’ayaso”-ed.May 6, 2019 2:20 pm at 2:20 pm #1723602GadolhadorahParticipant“Why do you suppose that it might enhance the Shalom Bayis to use the traditional Mrs. Husband rather than her own name?”
For the same reason that in some families, the wife uses a hyphenated surname, or the husband is comfortable with the couple being listed separately as Ms. XYZ along with his listing as Mr. ABC on invitations, shul announcements, etc. In some cases, in a second marriage with children, a woman remarrying may want to keep the same surname she went by in a prior marriage or revert to her maiden name or whatever. The point is simply that people come into marriages with very different circumstances and different issues of importance to them and particularly on matters that are not strictly dictated by Halacha, they may be able to find compromises on lesser matters they allow both to come away feeling respected. If the format of the surname is such a big issue to the husband or wife, he/she may decide its an indicator of even bigger conflicts in the future and that maybe they are not well matched.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.