Motion Sensors on Shabbos

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Motion Sensors on Shabbos

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #609318

    I’m not sure how the mechanics of motion sensors work, but what would you do in the following situation:

    On shabbos, you go to the restroom and when you are about to walk away from the toilet you realize that there is no manual flush, only electronic. Must you remain there for the rest of shabbos so not to activate the machine?

    #953495
    TheGoq
    Participant

    It’s a sakana to be seated for that long of a time so its ok to get up I’m not a rov but thats my take.

    #953496
    Chortkov
    Participant

    A Rav told me (about light sensors in the street) that he once asked R’ Shlomo Zalman Aurbach zt”l and he paskened that “A sensor is a switch”, and it is assur. I asked the Rav what he would do if he realised he is in front of a sensor – would he stay there the whole shabbos – and he said that he would be soimech on the makilim (e.g R’ Shmuel Vosner in Shevet HaLevi).

    (My Rav also paskened, based on R’ S Z Aurbach, that if you have a light in front of your house that will go on automatically, you must stay at home the whole shabbos and daven beyechidus!)

    #953497
    writersoul
    Participant

    It’s possible you could potentially put something else on top of the seat in order to weigh it down…

    I mean, you hear ofpeople spending Shabbos in the bathroom because leaving will turn off the light (true story), but this is a bit ridiculous.

    #953498

    I find this shaila interesting.

    If you Google “motion sensor toilet shabbos”, sans quotes, you will find discussions on this precise topic.

    “Psik raisha d’lo nicha lei” and “kavod habriyos” figure prominently in those discussions.

    #953499

    Goq- Lets say you are at a urinal?

    #953500
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Rav Wosner from Monsey said in a Shiur that it is fine, since it is not you that put that in place as much as the host.

    #953501
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    “I can only try ” has the sensible reply. The whole issue of electric circuits being triggered unwittingly is replete with “dovor she-ein miskaven’ and “lo niche lei”. Add to that the fact that some major poskim don’t consider electricity a “doirasai’ and add to that “kovod habrios” (that allows a shvus on shabbos).

    to yekke- Can you show me wehere R”Shlomo Zalman zz’l paskened the way yoy report?

    #953502
    TheGoq
    Participant

    I’m not sure secularfrummie good question. Thanks ICOT.

    #953503
    Chortkov
    Participant

    “Can you show me wehere R”Shlomo Zalman zz’l paskened the way yoy report?”

    No I can’t.

    I thought i made myself perfectly clear – this psak was m’pi hashmiyah. The Rov asked R’ Shlomo Zalman (I don’t know in what nussach or in what heicha timtza) and he said those words. “A sensor is a switch”.

    #953504
    Sam2
    Participant

    I would think that there is an obvious Chiluk between if walking in front of the sensor flushes the toilet and if leaving being in front of the sensor flushes the toilet. Leaving the sensor Mistama is a Grama. Walking in front of the sensor, according to R’ Shlomo Zalman (and what seems the Pashtus) is a Ma’aseh and probably a P’sik Reisha D’nicha Leih (you really don’t want that stuff sitting in the toilet) and you would probably have to stay there all Shabbos (or try rolling out under the sensor if you know exactly where it is).

    #953505
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    yekke2: thanks for your honest answer. This is why you can never rely upon so-called oral decisions. It could have been done in so many different ways and therefore it is important to know the actual parameters.

    Note that YOU added the words “and it is assur” which is not what happened with the Rov you mentioned. His quote (as per your own admission) is that R”Shlomo Zalman said that “a sensor is switch”. OK. But then, there are many things that can happen and will engender different piskei halocho.

    #953506
    Chortkov
    Participant

    ROB – The Rav told me it is assur, quoting R’ Shlomo Zalman’s words “A sensor is a switch”. This isn’t my psak; MY Rav told me actually that it is muttar and i do walk past light sensors. THIS Rav told me his psak, quoting R’ Shlomo Zalmans words.

    The Rav did try to bring in cameras (live recording) into this shaila, (although not l’maisa, he was talking based on the {debatable} principal that taking a photo will be ????, which he is ????? may not be ???? with digital), but that isn’t what he spoke to R Shlomo Zalman about.

    (If anybody has the ??? handy, have a look at R’ Elyashivs Hagodo (brought out this year) under ????? ???? ????? where they quote some rather amusing stories about questions people asked R’ Elyashiv and got a very confusing psak based on the way they phrased the question.)

    #953507
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    yekke2: thanks for the reply. As you quote from the Haggodo- it is very difficult to “pasken” from an oral psak. Although the person asking the question may rely upon an “oral psak’, the klal must have the exact parameters and this is only possible in writing.

    #953508
    yitayningwut
    Participant

    yekke2 –

    With regard to the case of the light in front of the house: while a sensor may be a switch, min hastam you have no idea which step will cause the light to go on/off. Therefore each step is a davar she-eino miskaven, which is mutar, because every davar she-eino miskaven that does not inevitably cause a melacha is mutar. This isn’t only my logic; I have heard this from many rabbanim.

    With regard to the toilet case, there are a number of factors to consider, including: 1) It is kil’achar yad (probably what Sam meant), since you are simply getting up to go on your way. While R’ Shlomo Zalman was known to hold that if this is the way it is always done it is not called kil’achar yad or grama, this is a chiddush which others reject. 2) R’ Shlomo Zalman himself would undoubtedly maintain that the electronic mechanism that makes the toilet flush is not d’oraisa. Therefore one can apply principles such as kevod habriyos, tza’ar, oneg Shabbos, etc. to say that one is not obligated to hold it in or stay in the bathroom all Shabbos.

    #953509
    Sam2
    Participant

    Yitay: There was a general Haskamas Haposkim to that. Otherwise, we could remove all M’lachos D’Oraisa Bizman Hazeh by using Gramas or electronics. And your Davar She’eino Miskaven setup doesn’t work. One step is a P’sik Reisha. You don’t know which one, but one is.

    #953510
    yitayningwut
    Participant

    Sam2 –

    I am not sure what you are referring to. If you mean R’ Shlomo Zalman’s chiddush of “the normal way” precluding kil’achar yad, I don’t know what you mean by haskamas haposkim. It just isn’t true; I’ve heard many poskim mention kil’achar yad as a valid point when it comes to opening refrigerator doors, turning on hot water faucets, etc. Kil’achar yad is still assur mid’rabbanan. As for your point that “otherwise, we could remove all M’lachos D’Oraisa Bizman Hazeh by using Gramas or electronics”; that is not a halachic argument.

    With regard to the davar she-eino miskaven point: As I said, it is not just my reasoning, but something I have heard from a number of prominent rabbanim.

    For example, R’ Tuvia Goldstein told someone I know that for a man to comb hair normally is not a psik reishe even though during the course of the combing hair will certainly be plucked out, since each individual time combing motion is not a psik reishe. He explained his reasoning in precisely this manner; i.e. that although the entire combing session presents a psik reishe, each individual combing motion does not. I have also been told by, or heard secondhand from at least three rabbanim that it is okay to walk in front of a house that has a light run by a motion sensor that will certainly go off; presumably by this reasoning. I have also heard other psakim that rely on this reasoning.

    #953511
    Sam2
    Participant

    Yitay: I have heard B’sheim R’ Moshe, R’ Shlomo Zalman, R’ Elyashiv, the Tzitz Eliezer, and others that any electronic device designed to work Al Y’dei G’rama cannot be a G’rama. I thought that’s what you were referring to.

    #953512
    ChiYid
    Member

    Dayan Rav Ephraim Friedman, Shlit”a (the country’s most accessible and competent posek, LA”D) of Chicago told me years ago that according to Rav Sholomo Zalman, ZTK”L, it’s not a ma’aseh therefore it’s nothing and you need not take any specific precautions.

    #953513
    Chortkov
    Participant

    With regard to the case of the light in front of the house: while a sensor may be a switch, min hastam you have no idea which step will cause the light to go on/off. Therefore each step is a davar she-eino miskaven, which is mutar, because every davar she-eino miskaven that does not inevitably cause a melacha is mutar. This isn’t only my logic; I have heard this from many rabbanim.

    I asked the Rav, and he said that if you don’t know exactly where the camera/sensor is, then it is ????? and therefore ???? ???????.

    #953514
    twisted
    Participant

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/rss/topic/motion-sensors-on-shabbos in some situations, you can cheshbon in psik reisha d’lo ichpis lei.

    #953515
    oomis
    Participant

    I am curious as to what type of place one would be in for a Shabbos, that would have activated motion sensors functioning on Shabbos? Surely no Shul would, most homes would not, and kosher hotels SHOULD not.

    My non-Jewish neighbors have a light sensor at night that is triggered by motion, so my husband and son walk in the street rather than on the sidewalk, which prevents it from being set off.

    #953516
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I am curious as to what type of place one would be in for a Shabbos, that would have activated motion sensors functioning on Shabbos?

    It happened to me in a hospital.

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.