Mamzer

Home Forums Bais Medrash Mamzer

Viewing 17 posts - 51 through 67 (of 67 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #892632
    Mammele
    Participant

    Thanks gavra. I never learnt gemara, so if you have time, can you please explain? Thanks.

    #892633
    ItcheSrulik
    Member

    There are only three kinds of mamzerim (Hilchos issurei beiah perek 16 IIRC)

    Mamzer d’oraisa

    Mamzer d’rabbanan

    That cop who pulled you over when you were running late for work.

    #892634
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Thanks gavra. I never learnt gemara, so if you have time, can you please explain? Thanks.

    I don’t think that it would be correct to do so on an english language thread. It is not exactly something that should be known, lest it become a l’chatchila (IMHO).

    Feel free to look into the Artscroll on the gemorah there, or the Shulchan Aruch if you don’t wnat to learn gemorah.

    #892635
    Avi K
    Participant

    Rabennu Gershom did not issue a takkana. He issued a cherem. It expired some years ago but the Israeli Chief Rabbinate has declared it to now be Minhag Yisrael.

    #892636
    choppy
    Participant

    The Teimanim and the Sefardim were never mekabel Rabbeinu Gershom’s cherems.

    #892637
    Toi
    Participant

    choppy- they taaneh that the fact theyve been noiheg it limaaseh for a good chunk of time makes it into the standard.

    itch- like.

    #892639
    choppy
    Participant

    Toi: The Jews in Yemen came to Israel with more than one wife. They were never noheig it. And even the Sefardim I’m not sure they were ever noheig it before they just couldn’t do it because the secular law of the country they moved to prevented them.

    #892640
    shmoel
    Member

    If a woman remarried under the assumption her first husband was killed, and someone finds out many years later that her first husband was in fact still alive when she remarried, is he obligated (or allowed) to let her children (born from her second husband while the first was still living) know they are mamzeirim?

    By not telling them he is allowing the creation of more mamzeirim when these children and grandchildren (indefinitely) marry. On the other hand, perhaps by not telling (and know one knows) they do not carry the halachic status of mamzeirim?

    #892641
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shmoel: Learn the last few Perakim of Yevamos and the T’shuvos Nodah Bihudah Even Ha’ezer and then you might be able to think about some of these types of Shailos. (See N”B O”C 1:35 too though, if I recall correctly)

    #892642
    shmoel
    Member

    Sam2: Could you be nice enough to summarize how the Gemora and Noda B’Yehuda would address my above shaila? 🙂

    #892643
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shmoel: No. I honestly couldn’t. I said “think about”, not “answer” because there are always complex Halachic pieces in place in these types of cases. What Eidim are believed to say, who qualifies as an Eid, whether we are able to believe 1 person on such a matter, whether we are allowed to believe 1 Eid, how much proof constitutes proof, etc. I know how I would approach such a case, but it takes someone with magnitudes higher levels of knowledge than myself to be anywhere near confident in giving an answer.

    #892644
    shmoel
    Member

    Okay Sam, fair enough. Modify the above shaila to if the first husband himself, after losing contact with his wife due to war, years later finds out she remarried (thinking he died) and had new children. Should he identify himself to and tell those children they’re mamzeirim?

    #892645
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shmoel: Once again, there are a lot of factors involved that I (or anyone here) is far from qualified to judge. And these questions have to be far more detailed. For example, if there were Eidim that actually said that he died then she might even be allowed to remarry him. But each case like this has thousands of potential Tzdadim and really requires looking into it deeply.

    (I had a whole Shtickel written out on some specific cases but I erased them. I am not confident enough in anything I say here to actually post it because I do not know if it’s Emes and do not want to give even the slightest misinformation on a topic like this. Not because this type of topic is more important than any other Halachic topic C”V, but because things like this are so complex that if I were to make a mistake (as happens often enough) it would not be so easy for someone to point it out by just bringing a simple Mareh Makom.)

    #892646
    oomis
    Participant

    A mamzer is from a relationship that is forbidden between a man and someone else’s wife. I am not 100% sure about the child of incest, but I would think it includes that as well. A child born to a man and a woman who would otherwise be permitted to him, is NOT a mamzer, even if they did not get married. If he is married, but the woman is not, the child is not a mamzer (but the father sure is, in my book!).

    #892647
    yitayningwut
    Participant

    There is a legend about R’ Moshe that he was officiating a wedding and in middle of the chuppa the mother cried out that her son was a mamzer. As the story goes, without a moment’s hesitation R’ Moshe said, “ignore her; her testimony is inadmissible.”

    #892648
    Englishman
    Member

    Sam: Somehow I doubt the likelihood that if this shaila c’v arose in real life that the person would google for a teshuva, find your post and pasken off of it.

    #892649
    Sam2
    Participant

    Englishman: You missed my point. I don’t expect anyone to Pasken from what I say. That’s why I usually cite the approximate source and don’t double-check. I give people a Mareh Makom. Here, that’s not possible. I’m not worried that someone will pasken incorrectly from what I say. I’m worried that a not-easily-disprovable Ziyuf Shel Torah would come from what I write here.

Viewing 17 posts - 51 through 67 (of 67 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.