Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Just testing the various “allowed markup”s βοΈβπ
Tagged: testing
- This topic has 198 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 8 months ago by β’οΈ Rand0m3x π².
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 22, 2017 12:02 pm at 12:02 pm #1241654YW Moderator-π―Moderator
Did @meno do anything?
March 22, 2017 12:44 pm at 12:44 pm #1241661Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantIs everyone else now seeing all the posts in this thread the way I am?
How can I get it to stop? It is annoying!
March 22, 2017 12:58 pm at 12:58 pm #1241684MenoParticipantDid @meno do anything?
It just makes a link to my profile page. There’s really no point
March 22, 2017 12:58 pm at 12:58 pm #1241689MenoParticipantIs everyone else now seeing all the posts in this thread the way I am?
Sometimes I wonder if other people see things the same way I do.
Then my brain starts to hurt so I stop thinking about it
March 26, 2017 9:51 am at 9:51 am #1243628SayIDidItβ’ParticipantThis is not the first time this thread got messed up. Seems like when too much code is used, things start to get weird (hence one of the purposes of this thread.)
SiDi™
March 26, 2017 10:57 am at 10:57 am #1243803Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantYou mean it’s weird for you too and it’s NOT just me??!! I’m so happy to hear that! After Meno’s post, I thought it was just me and that I was the weird one!
March 26, 2017 1:31 pm at 1:31 pm #1244223HaLeiViParticipantDoes ending the list help?
March 26, 2017 1:38 pm at 1:38 pm #1244225HaLeiViParticipantYou mean itβs weird for you too and itβs NOT just me??!! Iβm so happy to hear that! After Menoβs post, I thought it was just me and that I was the weird one!
It’s actually your post that did it. You created a list item but didn’t end it. This system has all the posts listed and styled a certain way. Because you didn’t end your list item, and since this system doesn’t check for that, you ruined the list hierarchy that the style page depends on.
March 26, 2017 1:39 pm at 1:39 pm #1244229YW Moderator-25ModeratorHaLeivi,
On behalf of everyone here, Thank you
March 26, 2017 3:31 pm at 3:31 pm #1244234HaLeiViParticipantWhat’s the word again, when you feel so proud and glad that you’re finally noticed? Oh, I got it: I’m humbled!
March 27, 2017 7:25 am at 7:25 am #1244362Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“Itβs actually your post that did it.”
I knew that my post did it (by accident) – I just wasn’t sure if it did it for just me or for everyone.
I also had tried fixing it, but I guess I didn’t know how. Thank you very much for fixing it!!!
May 1, 2017 9:12 pm at 9:12 pm #1267471Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantMay 1, 2017 9:27 pm at 9:27 pm #1267477Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantYeah! Thanks so much, Mod 25!!! π
May 2, 2017 7:55 pm at 7:55 pm #1268771Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantMay 2, 2017 7:56 pm at 7:56 pm #1268773Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantMay 2, 2017 7:56 pm at 7:56 pm #1268774May 3, 2017 6:08 pm at 6:08 pm #1269489Thinking allowedParticipantTesting links:
how do you do this?May 3, 2017 6:38 pm at 6:38 pm #1269515Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI don’t remember
May 3, 2017 7:23 pm at 7:23 pm #1269528Thinking allowedParticipantTesting again, are quotes necessary inside
<a href= >
May 3, 2017 7:34 pm at 7:34 pm #1269545β DaasYochid βParticipantWhat if I put a second (blank) post instead?
PSA: How to post links without blocking the post below yours π’
May 3, 2017 7:34 pm at 7:34 pm #1269547β DaasYochid βParticipantTesting
May 3, 2017 7:35 pm at 7:35 pm #1269554β DaasYochid βParticipantDoes that work?
May 3, 2017 7:50 pm at 7:50 pm #1269560Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantApparently not!
May 3, 2017 7:55 pm at 7:55 pm #1269566β DaasYochid βParticipantWhat’s wrong?
May 3, 2017 8:09 pm at 8:09 pm #1269576Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWhat do you mean? You blocked two posts. Oh – was that your point? Did you mean “what if I put TWO blank posts instead?”
I thought your second one wasn’t blank (sometimes they show up for a second, and I thought that one did, and that it wasn’t blank).
May 3, 2017 8:12 pm at 8:12 pm #1269583β DaasYochid βParticipantI blocked one post, which only said “testing”.
May 3, 2017 8:18 pm at 8:18 pm #1269587β DaasYochid βParticipantI think this is an eitzah, without needing to be a computer programmer.
Put the link after whatever you want to say in the post, then send a blank (or meaningless) post to be blocked. The following post should be visible.
I wish they would just fix this mishugas, but meanwhile, I think this works without any fancy tags.
May 3, 2017 8:33 pm at 8:33 pm #1269593Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI think it’s a great idea! But I think we need two blank posts, and posters should write in the original post that the next two are blank, so the readers don’t get frustrated and think that there really are blocked posts.
Shkoyach!
May 3, 2017 8:34 pm at 8:34 pm #1269592Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantDY – I see 3 posts in a row from you. The first is the one with the link, and the second TWO are blocked by the link. You don’t see that? The linked one is listed as: 7:34, and the blocked ones are: 7:34 and 7:35.
May 3, 2017 8:36 pm at 8:36 pm #1269598β DaasYochid βParticipantWhen you wrote “Apparently not”, what were you responding to?
May 3, 2017 8:40 pm at 8:40 pm #1269602β DaasYochid βParticipant.
May 3, 2017 8:42 pm at 8:42 pm #1269600β DaasYochid βParticipantMay 3, 2017 8:42 pm at 8:42 pm #1269608β DaasYochid βParticipantYes, when editing, it gave me the option to log the edit, and give the reason.
I had written s instead of a.
May 3, 2017 8:54 pm at 8:54 pm #1269624Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantNow your blank post was moderated before the link, so it didn’t help. Also, the link covers two posts, and you only put one blank post.
I know that because I saw your post (the first one under the link) for a milli-second since it was the last post moderated. But it really is blocked.
The one under it (second one under the link) hasn’t been moderated yet, but it is also blocked.
May 3, 2017 8:54 pm at 8:54 pm #1269623Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI mean, “not the last post”
May 3, 2017 8:55 pm at 8:55 pm #1269621Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantand by the way, now it is completely blocked and I can’t even see if for a milli-second since it’s the last post.
May 3, 2017 9:01 pm at 9:01 pm #1269620Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI was responding to your third post. There was a question there that I saw for a second before it got blocked.
I think if the blocked post is the last post that was moderated, when you click on the time of the last post on the main page, you see if for a milli-second before it gets blocked.(afterwards when you wrote that nothing was blocked, I thought that maybe I was remembering wrong and I hadn’t seen anything. But I must have seen something, because I remember now that “apparently not” was in response to something. I think you wrote, “does that work?”. But I guess you didn’t realize it was blocked since I responded to it.).
May 3, 2017 9:01 pm at 9:01 pm #1269619β DaasYochid βParticipantLol. The mod(s) approved my post in the wrong order, so it didn’t work this time.
I had written, “Yes, when editing, it gave me the option to log the edit, and give the reason.
I had written s instead of a.”
May 3, 2017 9:15 pm at 9:15 pm #1269636Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantlook – can’t you see now how two posts are blocked (actually one and a half, but that’s just because mine is long)?
And they did backwards order again, so it’s my post that is blocked even though it should have been yours πMay 3, 2017 11:57 pm at 11:57 pm #1269662β DaasYochid βParticipantNow your blank post was moderated before the link, so it didnβt help. Also, the link covers two posts, and you only put one blank post.
I know that because I saw your post (the first one under the link) for a milli-second since it was the last post moderated. But it really is blocked.
The one under it (second one under the link) hasnβt been moderated yet, but it is also blocked.
That entire post is visible to me.
I guess it depends on the browser, so two posts it is.
May 4, 2017 1:20 pm at 1:20 pm #1269954MenoParticipantIn all the time it took to figure this out, you probably could’ve become a computer programmer.
Also, what will happen when/if they fix the issue with links blocking posts below them? We’ll be left with a whole bunch of empty posts.
I have an idea. Maybe they should make it so when you post a link it blocks the post ABOVE yours.
May 4, 2017 6:43 pm at 6:43 pm #1270110Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“entire post is visible to me.
I guess it depends on the browser, so two posts it is.”That’s interesting – I didn’t realize that different people can be seeing different things. I couldn’t understand why you didn’t realize that 2 posts were blocked.
We still are left with the problem that posts often go up in backwards order. I think this is more likely to happen when the second post is smaller and needs less moderation (which is usually the case with a blank post).
The only way to avoid that is to keep checking to see when your post went up, and as soon as it goes up, make sure to quickly post two blank posts. But then, you still have a problem because another poster might post meanwhile, so that won’t help.
May 4, 2017 6:43 pm at 6:43 pm #1270111Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“I have an idea. Maybe they should make it so when you post a link it blocks the post ABOVE yours.”
That would solve the problem of posts going up in backwards order. But, if the posts are posted in the correct order and someone hadn’t yet read the post above yours and wants to read it, you still have a problem.Possible solutions:
1. Whenever you post a link, first repost the post above yours.
2. Post the blank post first and assume that it will go up first since it’s blank and doesn’t need too much moderation.I know that neither of these solutions would solve your problem Meno, but personally, I don’t think that’s such a bigger problem. The other problem is certainly bigger.
May 8, 2017 1:17 pm at 1:17 pm #1271828MenoParticipantThe benefit of being able to block the post above yours is that it’s fun
May 8, 2017 2:08 pm at 2:08 pm #1271882Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantonly if you think it’s fun to be mean.
I know your name is “Meno”, but I never thought of you as the mean type. : )
In fact I only just realized that your name is a homonym for meano.
May 9, 2017 6:06 pm at 6:06 pm #1273136πRebYidd23ParticipantJune 26, 2017 12:36 pm at 12:36 pm #1303962ubiquitinParticipantJune 26, 2017 12:43 pm at 12:43 pm #1303971β DaasYochid βParticipantYes, I like it.
February 16, 2018 2:46 am at 2:46 am #1470505β’οΈ Rand0m3x π²Participant(Test post)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.