- This topic has 52 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by Feif Un.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 13, 2008 12:29 pm at 12:29 pm #588015YusselParticipant
I would like to ask the following question:
Which is better from a “Jewish/Torah” perspective; listening to a “jewish” CD with music based on secular-rock/pop styles with hebrew words, or listening to Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms, etc. ?
It seems to me that the so-called Jewish Music of today is neither “jewish” or music. I don’t see how it is even as good for the “neshama” as a Beethoven piano sonata, or a Mozart Symphony or quartet.
anyway, that’s just my 2 cents.
August 13, 2008 1:59 pm at 1:59 pm #642584JosephParticipantListening to Bach, Mozart, Beethoven for sure.
August 13, 2008 2:25 pm at 2:25 pm #642585lesschumrasParticipantI think one thing we can agree upon is that there is nothing inherently “Jewish” about music ( I’m not talking about lyrics ). Music has always been a product of the surrounding culture that we’ve lived in. The music that many Litvaks would define as being Jewish( Eastern European based ) would be totally foriegn to my brother in law ( his family is from Iraq ) and my friends ( Bukharin Jews ). The Jewish music at their simchas is totally different than what we are used to but it doesn’t make it not Jewish.
Differnt generations have differnt tastes; it doesn’t make it right or wrong. I have a friend who lives in Har Nof and has been at chareidi weddings where the musicians are baale tshuva. Often times the people don’t realize that the tunes they are dancing to are taken from the band’s former life and applied to their current one. Good music is good music.
August 13, 2008 3:34 pm at 3:34 pm #642586torahis1Membernothing Jewish about Music?!
that is absurd!
how about the leviim in the bais hamikdash playing the harps etc.?
what about david hamelech playing for shaul?
August 13, 2008 5:01 pm at 5:01 pm #642587lesschumrasParticipantLet me claify. There is no one type of music that is can be defined as “Jewish” music to the exclusion of all others
August 13, 2008 6:19 pm at 6:19 pm #642588cantoresqMemberI posted these comments on another thread:
On this topic, there is only one form of authentic Jewish music, nusach, which is based upon the trope systems used in reading from the Torah, the Prophets and the Megillot. But even that music, which is essentially the pentatonic major and minor scales, from its literal inception in the First Temple era assumed the structure of the prevailing music of the day, the Greek tetrachords. Indeed Jews modified those tetrachord patterns to fit the pentatonic nature of their music. But trope and it’s extension, nusach are the only true Jewish forms of music. Leib Glantz demonstrated how the ever ubiquitous “freigish” nusach, or Ahava Rabah, as it is technically termed, is in fact one the most recent additions to our musical system probably coming from the near east well after the destruction of the Second Commonwealth. But since we’ve so completely incorporated it, it is definitively Jewish. Even Nusach and also chazzanut, the natural development of nusach, has been subject to secular influences over time. The pentaonic scales and the tetrachords of old became subject to major and minor systems of scale structure. The sonata, the minuet, the waltz, even the fugue, have been incorporated into our sacred music. Sadly, oh so sadly, even rock and roll and cheesy folk music styles are now heard in our schuls. But it’s silly for anyone to ever believe that there has been no outside influence on our musical heritage. the trick is in knowing what’s hitorically Jewish, and what isn’t.
August 13, 2008 6:51 pm at 6:51 pm #642589WolfishMusingsParticipanthow about the leviim in the bais hamikdash playing the harps etc.?
what about david hamelech playing for shaul?
Can you reproduce them?
I think it’s safe to say that he was referring to the Jewish music that is available today. There is nothing “inherently Jewish” about that. He obviously wasn’t considering the music you brought up becuase it’s not available to us.
The Wolf
August 13, 2008 6:59 pm at 6:59 pm #642590YusselParticipantIn view of the posts from lesschumras and cantoresq, my question remains: Perhaps our “neshamas” would benefit more from Bach or Beethoven than from Shwecky or MBD.
August 13, 2008 8:16 pm at 8:16 pm #642591Mayan_DvashParticipantI find myself drawn to the music of the albums that came out in the late 70s and early 80s. I think it’s because there was less technology then so when one produced a song there was substance as opposed to SOME (not all) songs today which are hollow shells surrounded by technology. [Another reason might be “Girsa D’Yankesa” — that a person has more of a kesher to things and events in his younger years.]
August 13, 2008 10:19 pm at 10:19 pm #642592rabbiofberlinParticipantcantoresq…your posting begs the question…Which trope do you accept as nussach? The litvishe trope? the German trope? The Galitzianer trope? The Yemenite trope? (Probably the most authentic one)
In truth, none of us even how what they sang in the Bais Hamikdash and what was music two thousand years ago. And nussach changes all the time but them, we have argued over that in another posting….
August 13, 2008 10:43 pm at 10:43 pm #642593abcd1234ParticipantWhen “the big event” was banne one of my techers handed out several articles about it and spent time discussing music, she mentioned how a girl was texting her friend and mentioned that she had a certain disney song and since the ban she was debating if she should listen to it and was asking for her friends “two cents” her friend replied that she should listen to it if the music would bring her closer to Hashem and make her a better person in any way… the sole purpose of music is meant to bring us closer to Hashem. just because a song does not originate from a jewish source if it will someway somehow improve your yiras Hashem (i know this is highly unlikely, but i guess anything is possible) than i dont see the problem with it. Bear in mind that still today there are singers, composers who are writing completely new tunes that did NOT originate from a goyish source.
August 14, 2008 1:12 am at 1:12 am #642594cantoresqMembercantoresq…your posting begs the question…Which trope do you accept as nussach? The litvishe trope? the German trope? The Galitzianer trope? The Yemenite trope? (Probably the most authentic one)
In truth, none of us even how what they sang in the Bais Hamikdash and what was music two thousand years ago. And nussach changes all the time but them, we have argued over that in another posting….
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Firs of all, I really am limiting my comments to ashkenazi nusach. I’m not very well versed in the development of Sephardic chazzanut much beyond a very superficial exposure to the makamot. But to answer your question, first off, there is remarkably little difference between say, the Lithuanian trope system and the German one. Secondly, I refer you to the seminal research of Leib Glantz and Abraham Idelsohn before him into the origins of trope, their relation to Greek tetrachords, the distintcly Jewish adaptations of those terachords, the expansion of trope into nusach, with the addition of additional tetrachords, and the expansion of nusach into chazzanut. Indeed we do not know precisely how the shira sounded. That tradition has been lost to time. But we do know the basis for that shira and can trace how that basis developed into Ashkenazi chazzanut. For a good book on the topic, I suggest you read the recently published The Man Who Spoke to G-d; festschrifft puvlished by Jerry Glantz in tribute to this father Chazzan Leib Glantz.
August 14, 2008 2:17 am at 2:17 am #642595Think BIGMemberI am not going to say that this kind of music is ideal. Music is a complex subject about which much has been discussed among the gedolei mussar. Music affects your neshama, that’s for sure, and so some will go so far as to say that even composers like those you mentioned, their neshomos went into their music, and it affects yours if you listen…(I have certainly heard that in regard to Yanni)
But i want to give you a perspective to consider, and if you don’t like it, just chuck it. abcd mentioned the big event. Lipa was recently interviewed and he made a point that I thought was interesting. He said, (something to this effect) “people nowadays want what’s new. I am giving them what they want. It doesn’t make sense to deny them that because they will just go somewhere else for it.”
While I definitely see that that line of reasoning is basically being metaher the tamey, and excusing themselves for it, the fact is that many young people struggle with the nisayon of listening to non-jewish music, which is infinitely worse (imho) than shwekey or mbd. If you give them kosher (or at least “jewish” entertainment that has beat, that will get them dancing to jewish words rather than non-jewish words, I would think there is merit in producing these albums.
Having said that, if you think or feel that listening to these albums effects your neshama badly, dont listen to them.
btw, how many of you out there do not listen to Shwekey??
August 14, 2008 12:47 pm at 12:47 pm #642596cantoresqMemberWhat’s a Shwekey?
August 14, 2008 1:55 pm at 1:55 pm #642597lesschumrasParticipantto Think Big,
I agree with you. No two people are the same. If the music moves you to Hashem , listen to it, if it affects your neshama badly, then don’t. By the way, the assumption I’m making here is that regardless of the beat, it’s been adapted to Hebrew lyrics/themes.
August 14, 2008 7:22 pm at 7:22 pm #642598Native IsraeliMemberspeaking about music
if any of u listen to nachum segal
they played yesterday a new song from a new singer yossi mayer—-i’ve got to say it sounds niceAugust 14, 2008 8:09 pm at 8:09 pm #642599FIDY23MemberI personally listen to goyish music. What I have noticed is that many “Jewish” songs sound very similar to the songs I frequently listen to. One specific example is the famous simcha song “mitzva gedola” from Piamenta, which is the EXACT music as a kol isha song. I don’t know who copied who, but I do find it hard to dance to that song at a simcha when the other lewd lyrics play in my head.
August 14, 2008 9:35 pm at 9:35 pm #642600eichnafluMemberto abcd123,
Even if todays composers do compose their own songs, they are still very much influenced by the non jewish music world.
August 15, 2008 3:09 am at 3:09 am #642601jphoneMember“Jewish Music (is it either)?”
I’m not sure of the answer, but I am sure of one thing, whatever it is, it is certainly loud.
August 15, 2008 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm #642602Mayan_DvashParticipant…it certainly is loud. There are bands who do listen to your request (especially if you’re the baal simcha) to tone down or lower the volume.
August 18, 2008 2:36 am at 2:36 am #642603Shalom_SParticipant@FIDY23: The version you refer to is not original either; Stella Soleil adapted/translated it from a song originally performed by one Tarkan Tevetoglu, who is male, so Kol Isha doesn’t apply. (I’ve seen a translation of the original Turkish lyrics, and while not exactly appropriate, they weren’t quite as rude as the ones Ms Soleil sang. See wikipedia d.h. “??mar?k” for the list of cover artists, including Piamenta. No, there aren’t supposed to be dots above those i’s.)
August 19, 2008 3:51 pm at 3:51 pm #642604The Big OneParticipantMuch of what masquerades as “Jewish Music” these days, is neither Jewish nor music.
April 14, 2009 8:17 pm at 8:17 pm #642607SamownMemberWell my 2 cents (before inflation) is that there are 3 types of ‘Jewis Music’:
1)”Music for Jews”- not necessarily Jewish Music but Kosher enuogh for
Yidden to listen to.
2)”Jewish Music”- Good, Geshmake, Yiddishe music
3)Secular influenced “Jewish Music”- Basicly Goyish nigunim with replaced
lyrics
April 14, 2009 8:38 pm at 8:38 pm #642608seeallsidesParticipantit’s actually pretty funny – you spend years singing asher bora – and then once you’re listening for traffic and the news fades out with the tune you always thought was jewish – with using english songs and making new lyrics – it’s like the more obscure the goyish song is, the less chance you have of being ‘busted’ – so you just have to make sure not to use english songs that kind of made it to the jewish world – if it’s english and no one heard of it – you’re probly safe – so i guess it’s not such a black and white science – halvay we should have R’ Dovid Hamelech with his harp, and the Levi’im – true pure music that is one with the neshoma! b’mheira b’yamenu!
April 17, 2009 6:19 pm at 6:19 pm #64261122OldGoldParticipantMusic affects the soul. So listening to Beethoven is probably better then listening to Matisyahu. I think Achar or someone in the Gemara that became an apikorus, was because he always was singing Greek songs. If he was such a big talmud chacham and music affected him so much then Kal V’chomer us.
But do the words make a difference? Like if it’s a Pasuk that is being sung to the tune of a Beetles song, is it better to listen to the original or the Jewish version?
April 17, 2009 7:39 pm at 7:39 pm #642612just meParticipantSamown, define “good, geshmaked Jewish music”. Chazanus sounds just like opera. I guess you can’t call THAT ggJm. About 50% of negunim from davening comes from R’Shlomo Carlbach. Many people don’t call him fit to listen to either. Many old Chasidic negunim come from goyish influences. I have to tell you that the traditional Chasal Sidur Pessach really sounds to me like a drinking song.
22OldGold, I beleive Achar became an apikorus after learning kabala when he wasn’t on that level. I don’t remember learning that music had anything to do with it.
April 17, 2009 8:14 pm at 8:14 pm #642613JosephParticipantInappropriate music undoubtedly negatively affects the soul.
April 17, 2009 8:59 pm at 8:59 pm #642614an open bookParticipant22oldgold: why do you think beethoven is better than matisyahu? (not arguing, just wondering what the reason is)
April 19, 2009 1:42 am at 1:42 am #642615cantoresqMemberJust me you have either listened to very little chazzanut or very little opera, maybe very little of both. But you don’t know what you’re talking about when you say Chazzanut sounds like opera.
April 19, 2009 1:44 pm at 1:44 pm #642617just meParticipantCantoresq, while I am not a great fan of either opera or chazanus, I think that there is a similarity to them. Not all the operatic songs, but some of the great arias definatally have the same elements are chazanic music. Yossele Rosenblatt was offered a job in the Metropolitan Opera and refused it for obvious reasons but the voice control that he had is what would have made him a star tenor. Chazanus is different than opera, but it is more similar to opera than any other type of music.
I hope you don’t feel that I am knocking chazanus with this comparison, but you have to admit that the ability to hold notes is what makes both type of singers great. You don’t usually find this type of singin in other music forms.
April 19, 2009 7:00 pm at 7:00 pm #64261822OldGoldParticipantan open book – I’m not sure but it just seems that way. Why do you think otherwise?
just me – I’m not sure if it was Achar. I don’t remember who, it was someone’s Rebbi, but it’s said because of “Tzemer Yevani”, that it never left his lips and he was always reading Greek literature.
April 19, 2009 7:34 pm at 7:34 pm #642619April 19, 2009 7:40 pm at 7:40 pm #642620an open bookParticipant22oldgold: do you mean because beethoven has no words? because you said music, not lyrics. & the difference between the music is what? one is by a christian (does that make it better?) & the other isn’t?
April 19, 2009 7:49 pm at 7:49 pm #642621moish01Membershe’s right. there are a few reasons and that’s one of them.
April 19, 2009 7:53 pm at 7:53 pm #642622an open bookParticipantmoish: i’m confused – who are you agreeing with??
April 19, 2009 7:55 pm at 7:55 pm #642623April 19, 2009 7:58 pm at 7:58 pm #642624moish01Member22OG. he was the one that was reading greek books.
he also became and apikores because of the story with his bris and because he was on of the four to enter pardes and because he saw a boy die after listening to his father and doing shiluach hakan. (did i get them all??)
April 19, 2009 8:07 pm at 8:07 pm #642625moish01Membermy question is, i’m sure he wasn’t the only one to read greek literature. you don’t think rambam did? and a whole lot of other rabbis?
i guess i could answer that and say that the other things all come into play. but then why are we commenting on his reading greek stuff altogether?
April 19, 2009 8:08 pm at 8:08 pm #642626an open bookParticipantmoish: ok thanks. i wouldn’t know, i only know of the last story. & i never heard of this guy before either.
April 19, 2009 8:31 pm at 8:31 pm #642627SamownMemberAch you guys got it all wrong, in Mesachtos Kiddushin Daf Lamed Tes (I think) it says that Achar became an Apikores becuase he saw a boy doing two Mitzvos that the Torah promises a long life (Sheluach HaKan and Kibud Av) getting killed.
Another reason is that he saw the tongue of Chutzpas HaMaturginin (a big tzaddik)
getting dragged on mud by the Romans (when they murdered him). So Achar said “The tongue that says pearls of Torah gets dragged on the mud!” So he sinned.
Check it up I think I’m right.
Also arent we getting a bit off topic?
April 19, 2009 8:40 pm at 8:40 pm #642628moish01Membersamown – there are a million reasons. how about his bris?
AOB, you never heard of acher?? rabbi meir’s rebbe (even after he became an apikores)
his real name was elisha ben avuya.
April 19, 2009 8:48 pm at 8:48 pm #642629April 19, 2009 8:49 pm at 8:49 pm #642630an open bookParticipantmoish: not that i remember…could be i about him but didn’t remember his name. is that whose talmid said about him “i ate the sweet inner fruit & threw away the bitter rind” or something? or am i mixing that up with someone totally different?
i did hear about the long life thing, but it was on its own, he was not mentioned nor were the other reasons.
April 19, 2009 9:41 pm at 9:41 pm #642631moish01Memberkapusta, news flash: i learned less gemara than you did “historia”
AOB, yeah so his talmid was Rabbi Meir. and yeah it says that about rabbi meir.
April 19, 2009 10:03 pm at 10:03 pm #642632kapustaParticipantmoish, I wonder, in class maybe but actually internalizing (like paying attention) probably not.
April 19, 2009 10:07 pm at 10:07 pm #642633moish01Memberha really? ok, maybe that could be true. when you learn gemara you can’t do that.
April 19, 2009 10:07 pm at 10:07 pm #642634an open bookParticipantmoish: ok, so that’s about all i know about him.
but historia includes lots more than the time period of the gemara, so you probably learned more from that time. also probably more details.
April 19, 2009 10:09 pm at 10:09 pm #642635moish01Membermaybe yes, maybe no. I know random things and i don’t remember everything.
April 19, 2009 10:10 pm at 10:10 pm #642636kapustaParticipantAOB, historiah is a LOT more boring than I imagine gemarah would be. Do you pay attention to it? You’re better than me…
April 19, 2009 10:23 pm at 10:23 pm #642637an open bookParticipantkapusta: it depends on the year & the teacher but usually not. but a few years ago my parents gave me sand & stars – this big 2 volume book of historia that i read once or twice. also sometimes interesting facts stay in my mind – like that thing about the bitter rind – i remember it but not who it’s about.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.