Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Jeans
- This topic has 283 replies, 67 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by oomis.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 4, 2009 2:03 pm at 2:03 pm #664914anon for thisParticipant
frumsatire, you’re kidding about the “jeans can’t be goyishe if a Jew invented them” line, right? Because ****; **** will never be Jewish songs, even though **** wrote them. I do agree that arbitarily calling some clothes goyishe is silly though.
Josh31, I’ve worked in that type of office too. If anyone came in wearing a suit people would ask if he had a meeting with the higher-ups or ask him how his interview went.
Please do not post the names of non-jewish songs. Thank You. Moderator-55
February 4, 2009 2:14 pm at 2:14 pm #664915cantoresqMemberflatbush27
Member
cantor: “I think G-d is glad I came”
so why not on shabbos and yom tov?
Posted 9 hours ago #
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Mostly for social reasons. The schul where I daven tends toward the slightly more formal; at least on Shabbat and Yom Tov mornings. Friday night, I tend to wear a pair of trousers and a sport jacket with a tie. Shabbat Mincha, I lose the tie. By Maariv, which is in a neighbor’s house, the jacket is usually gone too. On a slightly related note, I’m very influenced by the aesthetic of my surroundings. I daven better in a beautiful schul sanctuary. I feel uplifted by seeing a rabbi and other officiants in canonicals or a “hoich tzilinder.” A good chazan and choir brings me closer to the Almighty. It’s rather difficult for me to act and dress formally in a schul lacking aesthetic appeal. I get nothing from a room full of tables and odd matched shtenderlech, and from people at the amud who generally lack good voices and proper nusach. My sartorial choices reflect that attitude.
February 4, 2009 2:46 pm at 2:46 pm #664917SJSinNYCMemberIf you wear jeans just say you wear them because you like them, don’t give an explanation. They are not appropriate attire for religious people as they are a garb of non Jews but hey if you want to wear them go ahead just don’t go on the defense.
I would like to know where you get that its not appropriate for religious people. Is it that its casual? Because then women would not be able to wear jean skirts and I never heard of them being outlawed (frowned upon in some communities, but not outlawed). SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY WOMEN CAN WEAR JEAN SKIRTS BUT MEN CANNOT WEAR JEANS (pardon my yelling, but I broached this before in this topic and no one answered).
Also, everyone talks about dressing for our King – yes we do. But there is also a level up to dress. We generally save our fancier attire for shabbos/yom tov and then even fancier attire for weddings. If you wear it all week, then on shabbos its not a special garment! So yes, I see nothing wrong with being less formal during the week.
February 4, 2009 3:58 pm at 3:58 pm #664918anonymisssParticipantmy last post should say you’re on the last line not your.
Moish, I posted that before I saw your post. I guess you know what I mean.
~a~
February 4, 2009 7:06 pm at 7:06 pm #664921enlightenedjewMember“If you wear jeans just say you wear them because you like them, don’t give an explanation. They are not appropriate attire for religious people as they are a garb of non Jews but hey if you want to wear them go ahead just don’t go on the defense.”
Jeans are comfortable, and they take a lot of abuse. They’re great to wear casually.
As far as appropriateness, well, there are jeans and then there are jeans. Regular Levis. if you don’t wanna wear them, OK! If you do, also OK! But, once you start sifting through the fad brands and styles, ripped, logos, etc, then I’d be hard pressed to say those are NO PROB and also be intellectually honest. Plus I think regular ol’ Levis look way better. Full disclosure – I do wear jeans, weekends and Fridays.
February 4, 2009 8:22 pm at 8:22 pm #664922cherrybimParticipantI think if you’re going or coming to work and you wear jeans to work, then it would be acceptable, b’d’eved.
But, otherwise, it seems disrespectful to me to come so casually dressed (and certainly not in rumpled/soiled white shirt; jacket; slacks) to G-d’s house and to beseech Him in prayer (it only takes a few minutes to change from casual/comfortable to appropriate attire).
February 4, 2009 8:52 pm at 8:52 pm #664923frumsatireMemberrumsatire, you’re kidding about the “jeans can’t be goyishe if a Jew invented them” line, right? Because ****; **** will never be Jewish songs, even though **** wrote them. I do agree that arbitarily calling some clothes goyishe is silly though.
Josh31, I’ve worked in that type of office too. If anyone came in wearing a suit people would ask if he had a meeting with the higher-ups or ask him how his interview went.
Please do not post the names of non-jewish songs. Thank You. Moderator-55
Moderator exactly what is a Jewish song?
It seems that if a frum artist illegally copies a non-Jewish song and makes the lyrics yiddish thats ok – but if someone like Paul Simon creates his own song that its not Jewish. Seems a little strange dont you think
February 4, 2009 9:22 pm at 9:22 pm #664924gavra_at_workParticipantfrumsatire:
A jewish song is one “Jewish” people listen to, whomever “they” define as being “Jewish enough” 🙂
Also business casual does not allow Jeans (even w/o a suit).
February 4, 2009 9:37 pm at 9:37 pm #664925areivimzehlazehParticipantfrumsatire- wrong topic
moish- i’m going to have cardiac arrest! You can’t do this to me. I will personally come and take that gun if you even THINK of DREAMING of taking that yarmulka off your head. Do you hear me loud and clear?
My stomach is in knots- please tell me you didn’t take it off…
February 4, 2009 10:42 pm at 10:42 pm #664927moish01Memberchill. i’m not changing anything that quickly – for the good or for the bad. i just made a comment – you didn’t even hear the point in what i said. what’s the difference if i took it off? i haven’t left my house since friday anyway. no where to go even if i wanted to.
and anyway, why is that the biggest deal? you don’t freak if i say i smoked pot, but you have a flip attack if i sound like i might take off my yarmulka??
February 4, 2009 11:43 pm at 11:43 pm #664928Itzik_sMemberBS”D
It depends who you are and what you do. If your community allows them and they are clean and respectful then so be it. If you are wearing them as a sign of rebellion, then you will be treated accordingly.
However, many haimish contractors, repairmen, building supplies dealers, food preparers/butchers etc wear jeans to work and I do not see how they can change for mincha in the winter nor would they be expected to.
February 5, 2009 12:31 am at 12:31 am #664929ChanieEParticipantNot having anything even appropriate enough to wear next time I meet the Queen of England, I guess I should stop davening because the King certainly outranks the Queen …
February 5, 2009 1:23 am at 1:23 am #664930flatbush27Member“SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY WOMEN CAN WEAR JEAN SKIRTS BUT MEN CANNOT WEAR JEANS”
because how are jean skirts goyish. goyish women dont wear jean skirts (usually). goyish men wear jeans.
February 5, 2009 1:58 am at 1:58 am #664932kapustaParticipantre jeans: its a sensitivity in the “gray” area, meaning you can be a wonderful person if you wear jeans and you can be a…not so wondeful person and have never touched a pair of jeans in your life. jeans are not indicative of who you are as a person. its unbeleivable to me that we as frum jews have come to the point where it’s worth bickering with anonymous people about something like clothing that probably wont change the world anyway.
SJS good question wish I had an answer for you
February 5, 2009 1:59 am at 1:59 am #664933SJSinNYCMemberbecause how are jean skirts goyish. goyish women dont wear jean skirts (usually). goyish men wear jeans.
Many goyish women wear jean skirts, especially in the african american communities. Why do you think many main stream stores sell them? Whenever I am looking for jean skirts, I find them at regular stores (I don’t shop in Jewish clothing stores that often because of the price).
I was under the impression its the material thats the issue. After all, there are many mens pants made out of non jean material that follow “jeans” patterns and many pants made from denim that are made with a tailored look. So, is it the material thats the issue or the pattern? If its the material, then women wouldnt be able to wear jean skirts. If its the pattern, then tailored jeans should be appropriate. Please clarify.
I very much agree with Itzik’s post above. I would just add that no one should look down on someone who comes from a community that allows jeans, just accept that its not something you would wear.
February 5, 2009 2:04 am at 2:04 am #664934moish01Memberflatbush, you know that doesn’t make any sense.
we already said that they aren’t assur per se, but people tend to avoid it because of the “look.” so if jeans have a “look” why don’t jean skirts? it’s made out of the same material. you think they make jean skirts for the frum community?? no way. they make jeans for the world at large. trust me, gucci doesn’t have anyone in this levi’s doesn’t have anyone in this coffeeroom in mind when they’re designing anything.
and wait, i just saw a new jacket in the brooks brothers magazine. can’t buy it because it’s made by goyim, for goyim? that’s NOT the reason people don’t wear jeans.
February 5, 2009 2:04 am at 2:04 am #664935asdfghjklParticipantmoish01: you are a real member of the cr gang, we all care about you!!! just the idea of you saying what difference does it make if i take off my yarmalka-you wouldn’t ever know i was a jew w/o it!!! moish moish moish-we care so so much about you, it hurts us when you say such things like that!!! you are a yid, a yid-all yidden are different!!! in my heart, i just know that one day you’ll be this amazing person, one that we all would be so proud of!!!(i gatta say this has got to be the toughest cr day, with ames’s & squeak’s departure-i’m just in this mood of saying what’s on my mind!!!)
February 5, 2009 2:16 am at 2:16 am #664936Josh31Participantflatbush27, how does looking “goyish” translate into assur? We are dealing with a material that is being used because it is robust and suited for real work, not because it glorifies idolatry, violence or immorality. Are you going to declare that farming is not “Minhag Yisroel”?
February 5, 2009 2:40 am at 2:40 am #664937oomisParticipantbecause how are jean skirts goyish. goyish women dont wear jean skirts (usually). goyish men wear jeans.
WHAT????????????? ALL types of women wear jeans skirts. I am surprised you think otherwise.
February 5, 2009 3:43 am at 3:43 am #664938mw13ParticipantSJSinNYC, of course on shabbos you should dress more formally than during the week. So on shabbos wear a suit, and during the week wear dress shirt/pants (assuming you’re male). However, you still shouldn’t be dressed informally when davening during the week.
moish01, yarmulkas aren’t just about halacha. In the times of the gemara, only the rabbonim wore them. But today, a yarmulka is a statement. It says, “I’m a jew, and I’m proud”. Once you take off your yarmulka, you’re saying you don’t consider yourself to be a jew. And once you do that, chances are you’re not coming back.
February 5, 2009 4:42 am at 4:42 am #664939asdfghjklParticipantanyway this thread could get an update???? thanx mod72!!!
February 5, 2009 5:14 am at 5:14 am #664940moish01Membermw13
that is not true. at all. i’m being very honest when i say this: i don’t always wear one. there are times and places where i feel like it’s inappropriate. i won’t go into details but you can use your imagination.
February 5, 2009 5:21 am at 5:21 am #664941kapustaParticipantasdf I just noticed something very wierd (well maybe not so wierd but funny anyway) the older threads were updated but the time satyed the same only the username was changed. the consequences of not having a mod on for several hours.
February 5, 2009 5:47 am at 5:47 am #664942asdfghjklParticipantkapusta: yeah like i said earlier, wacky updates!!!
February 5, 2009 9:53 am at 9:53 am #664943NobodyMemberJeans are goyish – some denim skirts are also. But, as there are so many other materials available why go for denim if you know it’s not appropriate? As I said if you want to wear jeans – fine wear them because you like them but don’t say they are appropriate attire – cos they’re not.
Jeans have become a symbolic form of clothing of “Hey, I’m really cool in how I dress, I’m in with the in crowd”
The way a person dresses says a lot about him/her. When I interview someone I always look at how they are dressed – it says something and very often gives me an insight into their character. Taste does not come into the equation here it’s what lies behind how they present themselves that talks to me
February 5, 2009 2:28 pm at 2:28 pm #664944Itzik_sMemberBS”D
ChanieE – considering that the Queen of England is but the matriarch of the world’s most famous dysfunctional welfare family, I would have no problem meeting her while wearing jeans – if I actually had a pair :).
February 5, 2009 3:15 pm at 3:15 pm #664945SJSinNYCMemberAlso business casual does not allow Jeans (even w/o a suit).
Where I work, jeans are acceptable business casual wear in certain departments (such as mine). The reason this is allowed is so that when you are called out to the field (power plants, steam plants, substations etc) that you can still go without changing much (just changing into safety shoes).
SJSinNYC, of course on shabbos you should dress more formally than during the week. So on shabbos wear a suit, and during the week wear dress shirt/pants (assuming you’re male). However, you still shouldn’t be dressed informally when davening during the week.
Where I live, many men come to shul in khakis and a sports jacket on Shabbos. They will show up to shul in jeans, because its what they wear. I don’t have a problem with it, so long as the jeans arent the ripped/torn ratty looking ones. I do understand that others want to always be more formal, which is fine, but sometimes what I see men wearing to shul (although the material may not be denim) is the same level of casualness as jeans, just in a different color (for example, casual black pants).
Jeans are goyish – some denim skirts are also. But, as there are so many other materials available why go for denim if you know it’s not appropriate? As I said if you want to wear jeans – fine wear them because you like them but don’t say they are appropriate attire – cos they’re not.
Please clarify – is it the material that is goyish or the style of pants? If its the material, then no jean skirts would be ok for women.
I have no problem if you think that you wouldnt wear them, but calling saying they are inappropriate attire across the board (IMHO) is a misnomer.
Jeans have become a symbolic form of clothing of “Hey, I’m really cool in how I dress, I’m in with the in crowd”
In certain crowds this is true (and Itzik referenced this nicely above), but in my community jeans are normal attire. So wearing them is not a statement in any way. Walking into a yeshivish shul in jeans may be (depending on the situation) making a statement.
February 5, 2009 4:44 pm at 4:44 pm #664946NobodyMemberSJSinNYC
What I meant was that denim in itself is now connected with goyshe forms of dress.
However, I will stress there is denim and denim. Some denim is washed out and looks worse than other denim. I should also like to add that denim skirts should be avoided whereever possible.
You also refer to style. Style of clothing is another matter entirely and people should not need to be told that the style they are wearing is appropriate or not – they should know better.
You mention that in your community jeans are enormal attire, please do forgive me here but that is not normal attire unless the person does not know that there is or should be a dress code for shul.
I do not like confrontation or offending anyone and as I do not know you or your community I will refrain from commenting further to you.
February 5, 2009 6:00 pm at 6:00 pm #664947Feif UnParticipantNobody: denim is not connected with a goyishe form of dress. I don’t know where you get that idea from, but it’s wrong. Many people where denim, both Jewish and non-Jewish. I’ve been over to my Rebbe’s house and saw his wife wearing a denim skirt.
Wearing ripped, frayed jeans made especially that way is a different issue – not because it’s goyish, but because it doesn’t look presentable. You can look presentable in a normal pair of jeans.
I usually wear jeans on weekends because I do some work around the house. Jeans are comfortable, durable, and wash out easily. Do they get faded? Of course, all clothing does. The difference is that with other pants, as they fade, the material wears out also, so they don’t reach a point where they’re really faded. Jeans last longer, and can reach a stage where they’re extremely faded out.
February 5, 2009 6:04 pm at 6:04 pm #664948charlie brownMembermoish,
as far as taking off a yarmulka if one goes to an inappropriate place, I think I remember that Rav Moshe has a tshuva on that and says its better to leave it on. Does anyone else know if my memory is correct on this?
February 5, 2009 6:29 pm at 6:29 pm #664949anon for thisParticipantActually the only clothing I’ve seen Jewish people wear that I connect with goyishe forms of dress are certain plaid skirts, as I’ve stated above. It seems to me that this type of clothing is nevertheless considered acceptable for Jewish girls’ school uniforms simply because it’s convenient for the students to be able to buy from larger suppliers, and because there really is nothing inherently wrong with plaid skirts. Many people view wearing jeans the same way.
February 5, 2009 6:34 pm at 6:34 pm #664950moish01Membercharlie, you gotta be kidding. even if that’s the psak he gave, i wouldn’t be able to. waaaay too hypocritical for me.
February 5, 2009 6:40 pm at 6:40 pm #664951SJSinNYCMemberWhat I meant was that denim in itself is now connected with goyshe forms of dress.
I understand where you are coming from, though I disagree with you. You probably would have been part of the groups that ridiculed German Jews for wearing “short jackets” when they started, which is part of mainstream society now. We can agree to disagree on this point, because there are many things that I would put as “goyish” over denim. I am glad that at least you are consistent and think women shouldnt wear denim either.
As for style – there are MANY subjective areas of style as to whether or not its kosher, and this is often on a Rav by Rav basis what is paskened as ok or not. The point I was asking for is just to clarify if its the denim material, rather than the casual style of the pants. People seem to be jumping back and forth here and not really saying one, the other or definitively both. Nowadays, many jeans are made in trouser styles so that they are much more formal.
You mention that in your community jeans are enormal attire, please do forgive me here but that is not normal attire unless the person does not know that there is or should be a dress code for shul.
We are definitely going to have to disagree here. Many of the men who come to shul in jeans, usually on sunday, because that is their day to do things. This includes mowing the lawn, taking the kids to the park, hiking etc etc. Constantly changing clothing all day long just doesnt make sense. Also, they don’t wear ripped/stained/dirty clothing to shul, just more casual. And they need the casual clothing for their activities of the day.
You don’t have to worry about offending me (or my community) if you want to respond. As long as you speak nicely (as you generally do), its OK to disagree with me. I am generally the minority here, and have no problem with that!
February 5, 2009 6:54 pm at 6:54 pm #664952myshadowMemberSJS, I didn’t have time to read through this whole thread so I might be repeating other ppl.
As far as I know it all depends on the “minhag hamakom.” Obviously, if someone would wear jeans in boro park they would be making a statement, even if unintentional. However, I’ve been in many out-of-town communities where the men wore jeans and they were all frum ehrlich ppl.
February 5, 2009 7:58 pm at 7:58 pm #664953flatbush27Membermoish: then why dont some wear jeans if not for my reason
February 5, 2009 9:06 pm at 9:06 pm #664954moish01Memberdepends who. sounds like the people on here who do wear jeans wear them because they’re easy and comfortable and they have no reasons not to. if it’s not a stigma in their community, why not?
home don’t ask me why i wear jeans. NOW i just do because why not. it’s cool and comfortable. but yeah, when i started i thought my mother would freak. happens to be, she didn’t say a word. i’m still wondering who coached her on that one 😉
February 5, 2009 9:35 pm at 9:35 pm #664955AnonymousInactiveTo YW Moderator-21: Please check your sources. “Dungarees” comes from one of the Indian languages (i.e., the subcontinent of Asia, not “Native American”), and may have nothing to do with dung.
Does a Jewish laborer, chef, carpenter or mason have to wear a black suit and white shirt on the job? I do not think so.
February 5, 2009 9:41 pm at 9:41 pm #664956SJSinNYCMemberthen why dont some wear jeans if not for my reason
Flatbush, there is a big difference between saying you CANT wear jeans and saying that its not how you want to present yourself.
Many people (as said above) don’t wear jeans because they think they are too casual. This is a far cry from “I think a male Jew who wears jeans would be not be following the above said halacha.” Do you understand the difference?
February 5, 2009 10:14 pm at 10:14 pm #664957oomisParticipant” In the times of the gemara, only the rabbonim wore them. “
So what did the rest of the guys put on their heads? Guaranteed there were no Borsalinos in those days.
People have correctly posted that jeans were invented by a Jew, Levi Strauss.
People have also pointed out that chassidim adopted the garb of the Polish non-Jews, and looking at them today, one would never know that their levush is non-Jewish in origin.
So which form of dress is goyish and which is not? When the chassidic garb was adopted, it was during “modern” times for those chassidim (though it is the past history for us). So they actually were wearing modern-day non-Jewish clothing. AMAZING! And yet, when someone points out that the subject of some 135-140 posts were actually invented by a Yid, there are people who adamantly refuse to admit that this is so. And the argument that certain winter non-Jewish hioliday songs were written by Jews shows that that does not automatically confer Jewish status on something, is misleading. Those songs clearly and absolutely are defined by their non-Jewish holiday content. Unless I see a tzeilem or some other clearly non-Jewish icon on those jeans, I have no reason to follow that same line of thought as the music issue provoked. Clothing made by a Jew is Jewish clothing, unless there is reason to think otherwise. whether or not one chooses to wear it, is that person’s personal preference. it can be a matter of taste or the feeling that it is more religiously decorous, but it is not something that should be referred to as “goyishe clothing,” in my opinion.
February 5, 2009 10:18 pm at 10:18 pm #664958miamimiamiMemberMaybe you can help me. Is it better that I wear Jeans and a hat to a minyan or daven at home in PJ’s? (Moderator please post!)
February 5, 2009 10:21 pm at 10:21 pm #664959moish01Memberyou wear jeans and a hat?? wow you’re more confused than i am!
February 5, 2009 11:03 pm at 11:03 pm #664960kapustaParticipantmiami whe you wear pjs do wear your tzitzis sticking out?
February 5, 2009 11:09 pm at 11:09 pm #664961moish01Memberwhat a question!
February 6, 2009 12:25 am at 12:25 am #664962beaconParticipantmiami – funny 🙂
February 6, 2009 1:15 am at 1:15 am #664963anon for thisParticipantoomis, by giving that example I was trying to say that an invention or idea isn’t inherently Jewish simply because a Jew thinks of it, nor is it inherently “goyish” if the inventor/ composer/ writer isn’t Jewish. Is the theory of radiactivity (discovered/ studied by Pierre & Marie Curie) somehow less Jewish than the theory of relativity? I wasn’t trying to be flip, just giving an example to make my point, which is that even if jeans were invented by a non-Jew that in itself doesn’t make them goyish. And if plaid skirts aren’t considered goyish just because they’re worn by Catholic schoolgirls, surely jeans aren’t goyish either.
February 6, 2009 1:53 am at 1:53 am #664964JosephParticipantsomething made by a frei yid, or a yid not in line with the Torah, is not a Jewish thing.
February 6, 2009 2:32 am at 2:32 am #664965SJSinNYCMemberJoseph, maybe, but it doesnt make it treif either.
I agree with Anon – if we allow (and often require) our children todress like catholic school girls, maybe we should reevaluate whats “goyish”
February 6, 2009 3:01 am at 3:01 am #664967Josh31ParticipantBut for something to be prohibited because of “Chukas Akum” (literally acts / customs associated with idol worship) it has to be associated with idolatry (even acts of idolatry that are only prohibited to Jews), immorality or violence.
When use of an item or material has a clear cut practical reason (such as economy or comfort), that is evidence pointing away from Chukas Akum.
February 6, 2009 3:08 am at 3:08 am #664968moish01Membernot everything in this world has to be a “jewish thing”
February 6, 2009 3:20 am at 3:20 am #664969asdfghjklParticipantmiami: ha real funny!!! on behalf of the cr board & the cr gang, we welcome ya to the cr!!! head to the new members thread so everyone could give ya a proper welcome!!!
kapusta: wow ha ha ha!!! i think that should be the post of the day!!!!!
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Jeans’ is closed to new replies.