I need help with homework

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee I need help with homework

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2022932
    tunaisafish
    Participant

    If on daf vov (or some daf) of baba metziah the gemara brings 3 cases of Choshid amomoina lo choshid ashvuosa why does rashi still say choshid amomoina choshid ashvuasa?

    #2022975
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    Why are you asking me?!?

    #2023032
    aposhiteyid
    Participant

    OMG tunaisafish
    It was disscused in class!

    #2023058
    tunaisafish
    Participant

    ,

    #2023059
    tunaisafish
    Participant

    Rashi follows abaye

    #2023110
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    Abbayai over there answers that those three cases, the reason why he’s not choshid is because we’re chayish for sofek malve yeshana. And, if not for that, we’d say choshid amomoina choshid ashvuasa.

    Your kasha was Tosefus. My asnser is Ramban.

    P’nei Yehoshua defends Tosefus: if we’re always chayish for sofek malve yeshana, then the bottom line is he can never be choshid ashvuasa.

    #2023322
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    tunaisafish, (uch, I wish you had a better screen name, I hate tuna, how about ‘icecream’?)
    Did you get 100 on the homework. Remember, you’re supposed to say b’shem amro: amar Little Froggie b’shem the heileger Ramban…

    #2023336
    tunaisafish
    Participant

    Thankyou little frogie. i wrote on bottom of homework “b’shem amro: amar Little Froggie b’shem the heileger Ramban” I havent got results yet.

    #2023800
    5TResident
    Participant

    Check the Artscroll

    #2023834
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    In SA CH’M 92,3 says that if we have witnesses that he stole, then we don’t let him swear as milva yeshena does not apply.

    #2023842
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    Did you? He doesn’t answer Tosefa’s Kasha.

    #2023889
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    R E, Were discussing Choshud, not kofer or eidim.

    #2024415
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Little Froggie, I think that the SA answers all questions. Abbaye’s view is accepted when possible but a safek does not undo a vaday, so normally we are not chashud but if we know for a fact with eidim that he steals even rabbinically as playing cards, we are chashud and no shevua is placed on him.

    #2024433
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    R E. Exactly. That is why Tosefus asks on Rashi. And The Ramban answers. And the Pnei Yehushua answers for Tosefus.

    Because here all cases are not vaday, still we’re concerned for choshid amamona choshid ashvua

    #2024471

    Froggie, please appreciate that Reb E went to yeshiva when Jack Kennedy was still alive. Learn as well.

    #2024546
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    ‘not vaday, still we’re concerned for choshid amamona choshid ashvua’. Froggie, I don’t know what you are saying. Only if we know for sure he did an aveira even a derabonon are we choshud as the words of the SA.

    שולחן ערוך חושן משפט הלכות טוען ונטען סימן צב סעיף ג
    וכל מי שחשוד ליקח ממון חבירו, {ט} חשוד על השבועה, (ח’) ודוקא שיש עדים שלקח ממון חבירו, {י} ו’] ג’) אבל
    בלא עדים אינו חשוד, (ג) ד} דשמא ({יא} ו
    [ב] ספק) ד’) ד) מלוה ישנה יש לו עליו שבשביל כך (ח*’) תפס אותו

    #2024545
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    Amar Reb Yaakov Kennedy?

    #2024665
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    R E

    I’m afraid you’ll have to refer to the opening post, do the Gemarah and Rashi. You’ll see his question. And the conversation here.

    #2024671
    tunaisafish
    Participant

    LITTLE FROGY I GOT A 100!!!!! Thank you

    #2024680
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Little Froggie’s best topic is actually Hilchos Ribbit.

    #2024673
    tunaisafish
    Participant

    “In SA CH’M 92,3 says that if we have witnesses that he stole, then we don’t let him swear as milva yeshena does not apply.” in tosfos D’h Choshid amomoina choshid ashvuasa we say that vadai ganav is choshid ashvuasa midirabanan.

    #2024779
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    DY, I had to read that three times till I got it!!!

    #2024855
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    When it comes to Ribis, it says lo yechetzu yemehem. Explains the Ben Ish Chai that Yitzchak Avinu said that half of time people are sleeping so they should not be punished as they are not sinning. However, one who takes ribis, even when he is sleeping his money makes money, so the days cannot be divided in half, but vaani evtach boch, I trust you, so I don’t take ribbis and my days will be divided.

    #2025510

    I need help with another question. on daf zayin how can the husband claim that he gave kesubah if he passed away? Frogie, Reb eliezer, Common saychel?

    #2025659
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    In the case where he passed away (נתארמלה), it’s referring to the heirs who are paying the Kesuba (יורשי הבעל).

    #2025657
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    I think the yesomim claim that the kesuba was returned to them after she was paid and they lost it and she claims that she lost it before it was paid.

    #2025694

    So she gives the heirs the kesubah?

    #2025757
    Little Froggie
    Participant

    That is the question of the day, they claim it was paid, she claims it wasn’t who do you return the Kesuba to? Because if you return it to her, she’ll use it to get her money (perhaps a second time). The heirs (or the husband the case of Gerusha) have no use for it other than to prevent the woman from getting hold of it.

    #2025759
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    I think so in order to be paid as no shover is written.

    #2025812
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    To whom do you return the kesuba to? There are both muchzakim here. The heirs the money and the wife the kesuba. Could be that since the kesuba is out of her hand here, she is not muchzak on it any more, so we say they paid it and she cannot collect the kesuba.

    #2026283
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Explains the Ben Ish Chai

    Who explains the Ben Ish Chai?

    You see, Yiddish and English aren’t the same. Pay attention to well written Torah in English.

    #2026284
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    The way I understood that Rashi on 3b is that he isn’t referring to the Halachah of חשיד אממונא, but rather the logic of it. Since we are delving into a טעמא דקרא this problem is dealt with as well.

    #2026339
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    HaLeiVi, you like better the Ben Ish Chai explains? By me they have the same meaning. I did not put a subject in the front, obviously I mean the subject is the Ben Ish Chai. If someone else explains, I would have said, the Ben Ish Chai is explained. Why don’t you criticize the exchange of who and whom, the subject and the object?

    #2026346
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    In yeshivas, translated from Yiddish, hold is used instead of up to as where do we hold and asks the gemora and answers the gemora but I learned gemora in Yiddish.

    #2026425
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    There is a joke where someone knocks on the heaven’s gate and he is asked, who is this? He answers, it is I. He is being retorted, another English teacher.

    #2026556
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    I understand how it comes from the Yiddish, but it’s much worse than using a certain word in a localized way. This is just not an English sentence. That’s just not how verbs connect to subjects.

    #2026698
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Why don’t you look and substance? Don’t be tofas hatafel unaniach kaikar as language devolves. Impacted in place of affected was frowned upon but now it is part of regular speech.

    #2026727
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Again you are referring to the usage of a word. But that is on no way similar to the basic sentence structure. Let me rephrase that.

    Referring you are again to the usage of a word…

    #2026729
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Why do you assume I didn’t understand the substance? Are you expecting a gif of my nodding, or should I post: “Aha. Mm Hmm. Very nice vort”?

    Now, surely language can eventually adapt to include what became widespread. But that is hardly an argument to speak incorrectly now, whilst hoping it will one day be part of normal language. Speaking unclearly has no benefits. It doesn’t help your own thinking, either, as we find in Eiruvin 53.

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.