Hi I’m back 3.0

What I cannot understand is that Gemara Shabbat clearly modifies takanat derabanan of ner hanuka to put it al shulhano inside.
And people keep on ignoring this clear gemara and [mis]using it to advocate for a purim torah that it is preferable [!] to sleep out of the suka even when all kulot in halacha are exhausted.

No one used Chanukah to advocate for sleeping outside of the Sukkah. That doesn’t make any sense (strawman).

I will repeat my simple question, which no one has been able to answer:
Why do you (Yankel, Daas, etc.) insist on attacking Chabad for davka not sleeping in the Sukkah, while ignoring those who DAVKA don’t eat in the Sukkah on Shemini Atzeres, and DAVKA light the menorah indoors – both of which are seemingly against halacha.

What I cannot understand is that Gemara Shabbat clearly modifies takanat derabanan of ner hanuka to put it al shulhano inside.

Yankel: If you can erase the words “בשעת הסכנה” from your Gemara Shabbos – why’s it so hard for you to accept that the Rama modified the mitzvah of Sukkah to not include sleeping?

Is it backwards that people davka don’t eat in the Sukkah on Shemini Atzeres?
It’s k’neged Halacha, but it’s not backwards.

Daas, be so kind as to explain your deep words to a simple person like me:
Why is the minhag of DAVKA sleeping outside the Sukkah backwards (even though it has *some* basis in Shulchan Aruch), while the minhag of DAVKA eating outside the Sukkah on Shemini Atzeres (with *no* basis in Shulchan Aruch) is not backwards?
[And again, don’t forget to explain why the minhag of DAVKA lighting the menorah indoors, contrary to the mitzvah of pirsumei Nissan – is not backwards. Thanks]