Home › Forums › Shidduchim › Getting the other to say no
- This topic has 86 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 4 months ago by 🍫Syag Lchochma.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2013 1:33 am at 1:33 am #972108popa_bar_abbaParticipant
I don’t think you even understand the objection. You keep talking about honesty, when that isn’t the problem at all.
The problem is bein odom l’chaveiro. It is a mean and horrible thing to manipulate people for personal gain, especially in such an emotionally sensitive area.
I am even more troubled that you say you won’t do it because you want to be honest. Honesty is still about yourself–you are still only thinking about yourself while interacting with other people.
I’m not kidding here; I think you need to think about this, especially inasmuch as you are considering getting married. You need to interact with other people while considering what is going in their life–not only how the interaction can help or hurt you.
And it has nothing to do with shidduch dating. I’ve done way more shidduch dating than you have (I can guarantee that one, with AAA rating). I am intimately familiar with the dynamics you are referring to.
And even DY is only arguing in terms of degrees–he agrees it is unethical. And even he is thinking about the other person–he thinks sometimes the other will be less hurt this way.
I think you are a good person, but you have been very misguided in this area of personal interaction.
January 25, 2013 1:37 am at 1:37 am #972109OneOfManyParticipantNevertheless, I wouldn’t do it because I believe shidduchim come from Shamayim and my hishtadlus is to always tell the truth and not mislead people. In this case, this would cause me some wasted time, but that’s worth it for me to be a person who is honest.
But I agree with DY that it is not really unethical, and I wouldn’t judge someone else who did this.
Dishonesty is inherently unethical, unless you have a very good reason for it. If shiduchim are all from shamayim, etc., then why would lying to facilitate them be justified?
It’s interesting that there are two distinct groups of responses here. My hypothesis is that if you ONLY do shidduch dating, you think that this is an okay thing to do.
I am not yet dating, but I plan on using the shidduch system exclusively when I date.
January 25, 2013 1:40 am at 1:40 am #972110OneOfManyParticipantand I agree with popa that dishonesty is not at all the issue here.
January 25, 2013 2:15 am at 2:15 am #972111Torah613TorahParticipantNot disagreeing with him is also manipulation in terms of leading him on.
Say I and my friend are very good at the conversation part of dating and enjoy making people enjoy themselves, and this is a frequent result.
The purpose of dating is to see if they’re right for us, and if it’s obvious they’re not, we’re ‘damned if we do and damned if we don’t’. If we continue being our sweet easygoing selves, which is the way we are to those we like and we do behave that way at home too, the person thinks we want to date again and will be very disappointed when we say no. Again, this is the pure shidduch system and anything we do will be reported to at least 3 people.
We already discussed the other option.
I agree that it is unethical to manipulate someone purely for personal gain. But this gives him fuller freedom of choice, I am not limiting his choices in any way.
I apologize for my poor writing and expression recently, my brain is being overloaded in mathematics and my verbal skills are taking the blow.
January 25, 2013 2:31 am at 2:31 am #972112popa_bar_abbaParticipantNow you’re just changing the circumstances to annoy us. You certainly didn’t read my remarks as telling you to be dishonest in order to keep him and then be the one to say no.
Gentlemen, we have been trolled. I probably deserved it.
January 25, 2013 2:37 am at 2:37 am #972113Torah613TorahParticipantOf course I am changing the circumstances. It’s a hypothetical situation and can therefore change to suit my imagination.
Anyway, I am proud to have successfully, if inadvertently, trolled the great Popa Bar Abba.
January 25, 2013 2:55 am at 2:55 am #972114OneOfManyParticipantI think she is little misguided, and too given to blindly justifying what she is used to. I don’t think she is trolling.
January 25, 2013 3:00 am at 3:00 am #972115OneOfManyParticipanttorah613: Being nice to people you don’t necessarily like isn’t manipulative – ostensibly, you should always be nice to people, whether you like them or not. It would be unreasonable to expect someone to be rude in order to make the other person aware of their disinterest.
January 25, 2013 4:22 am at 4:22 am #972116☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantT613t,
I did not say it was ethical (my previous post was facetious, in response to popa). I think it is UNethical.
I was only disagreeing with the degree to which it is wrong, assuming the other person wasn’t being hurt. Still, I think it is a lack of respect for the other, unless the motivation is purely to save them from hurt feelings (which it isn’t). So although I disagree with it, I don’t think it defines the person as selfish.
If the other person is being hurt, I think it’s a horrible, selfish thing to do.
January 25, 2013 8:03 pm at 8:03 pm #972117oomisParticipantOh, and let’s flip the story.If I found out a guy had done this to my sister–I would round up my brothers and hunt him down and give it to him the old fashioned way.And tell everyone in the world. “
See, I told you GUYS TALK!!!!!!!!
January 25, 2013 9:10 pm at 9:10 pm #972118supermeMemberYeh just be straight out it will be better in a long one. Guys and women just talk and talk so it can get spread around then your name might not be the greatest. Hatzlacha
January 27, 2013 1:39 am at 1:39 am #972119Torah613TorahParticipantWell, I recently had such a situation, and I said no. I really appreciated it the one time a boy said no to me on a date, I thought it was very honest and direct.
January 27, 2013 1:46 am at 1:46 am #972120OneOfManyParticipantoomis, superme: Surely you don’t think the only reason you shouldn’t do such a thing is because people will talk?
January 27, 2013 2:37 am at 2:37 am #972121OneOfManyParticipantActually…after reading your earlier posts, oomis – I take that back. Sorry.
January 27, 2013 3:32 am at 3:32 am #972122supermeMemberOne of many- no that’s not the reason but that is one reason to be careful. There are many more and peoplewere all talking bout other people talking about it so thats why I said that but there are many other reasons to if u want I can tell you..
January 27, 2013 3:57 am at 3:57 am #972123OneOfManyParticipantlol I am with you on that. I just think that the main reason is that it means you are a callous (or at the very least, unthinking) person, which is something to be very concerned about…
January 27, 2013 5:14 am at 5:14 am #972124oomisParticipantThe main reason, is that it is not acting like an adult to not be honest and forthright with another person. It is worse to deliberately act in such a way as to make that person think negatively about you. No one is putting a gun to your head to go out with the person. As I said previously, there will be many such moments with which you are faced in life, where you will want or need to say no about something important and it may even be a really uncomfortable situation. This is part of adulthood.
(It’s why I am so against the whole “let the shadchan do the asking out and breaking up for you,” deal) If you are old enough to date, you are old enough to UNdate, as well. And yes, if you act in less than a menschlech way, people WILL talk about you.
January 27, 2013 5:34 am at 5:34 am #972125supermeMemberOne of many- I 100% agree with you
January 27, 2013 6:15 am at 6:15 am #972126☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe main reason, is that it is not acting like an adult to not be honest and forthright with another person.
Be careful with that. Mutar l’shanos mipnei hashalom. You certainly wouldn’t expect someone to be honest and forthright if they didn’t want to continue dating because one found the other unattractive.
The most important thing to take into consideration is the other person’s feelings, which is actually a very good reason to use a shadchan.
January 27, 2013 11:44 pm at 11:44 pm #972127ShiraTobalaMemberyes
January 28, 2013 12:06 am at 12:06 am #972128supermeMemberThat’s true
January 28, 2013 12:06 am at 12:06 am #972129supermeMemberBut normally after like 3/4 date you drop the shadchan
January 28, 2013 1:33 am at 1:33 am #972130Torah613TorahParticipantSuperme, that entirely depends on the dynamics of the relationship. Honestly, there can’t really be rules after the 3-4 date. Sometimes one party is less enthusiastic, and the shadchan becomes even more important.
January 28, 2013 2:02 am at 2:02 am #972131supermeMemberThat’s true but I’m only sayingthis bec DY made a comment on shadcanim so I said right but they got dropped sometimes… But thankyou for clarifying it torah613613torah
January 28, 2013 2:38 am at 2:38 am #972132☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe shadchan often stays involved until the end. Often, “dropping the shadchan” only means that the boy asks her for another date on his own, but the shadchan still works to try to keep things smooth.
January 28, 2013 4:13 pm at 4:13 pm #972133y meMemberHere’s a compromise: Try telling the truth – that you frequently post in YWN’s coffee room – that’s sure to get him to say no. Oh, right – you still want to preserve your good name in the shidduch world so maybe you shouldn’t mention YWN posting.
August 23, 2013 12:01 am at 12:01 am #972134yoyaMemberbump:)
August 23, 2013 2:00 am at 2:00 am #972135popa_bar_abbaParticipantI changed my mind. I agree with Torah completely.
August 23, 2013 3:24 am at 3:24 am #972136☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI changed my mind. I agree with Torah completely.
August 23, 2013 5:39 am at 5:39 am #972137commonsenseParticipantDY please explain
August 23, 2013 12:48 pm at 12:48 pm #972139☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI am showing exasperation that he changed his mind, as a spoof of his exasperation with me, earlier.
I don’t take his “change of mind” seriously, though.
August 25, 2013 5:59 am at 5:59 am #972140commonsenseParticipantgot it. thanx
August 25, 2013 2:10 pm at 2:10 pm #972141ObstacleIllusionParticipantSay no to say yes.
August 25, 2013 8:46 pm at 8:46 pm #972142midwesternerParticipantI just re-read this. Wow! Very interesting watching it all develop!
August 26, 2013 6:32 pm at 6:32 pm #972143popa_bar_abbaParticipantFor the record, I still don’t agree with DY though.
August 26, 2013 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm #972144midwesternerParticipantNot nearly as important as the other way though.
August 27, 2013 3:45 am at 3:45 am #972145🍫Syag LchochmaParticipantDoes bring up a few questions.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.