- This topic has 311 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 3 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
Ubiq -“I get that your access-a-ride job doesnt pay much. But getting paid for commenting on YWN sadly isnt a thing (unfortunatly, otherwise based on this absurd thread alone, we’d both be rich!)”
I never said I wanted payment for any of my comments on YWN.
But I did say if you want me to prove that I’m correct, we can go to a third party, nothing to do with YWN. I’m proposing that, but your obviously scared!
“Comment for conversations’ sake. Have a discussion like a mentch you made an assertion. either back it up, say its private and you dont want to discuss it furtheror admit you made it up. Charging money isnt a thing”
Actually you have no knowledge of Mentchlikite! I made a comment and you started that it must be not true, unless I can prove it by posting that proof on YWN! Your thought processes are illogical!
“LOL! Btw, What protocol did I make up?”
this one :
“In any car crash, even though there’s the possibility of a medical cause, it’s Not probable!
But in 1 car crash, it has to be treated as a medical call, along with trauma.”
from this classic thread: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/treatment
“That is a line from somebody who doesnt know anything on the subject.
The subject of medicine!”
Ok, I’ll bite. How so? I’d love to here how a say allergist who spends two years basic sciences (NO EMS protocols there), followed by 2 years of basic roations w/ electives where s/he may not choose to do EM (No EMS protocols there. Follwoed by 3 years Int med in a program (like most) that fudges the EM requirement or has a bare minimum of 2 weeks (No EMS protocols there) followed by 2 years fellowship in aLLErgy (NO EMS protocols yet again. At what point does that physician encounter EMS protocols?”
“I never said I wanted payment for any of my comments on YWN.”
amazing stuff!
Here are some examples
“Tutoring costs money! Here’s one freebie:”
“Also I would have given you the information about my court case for free, but now that I’ve experienced your posts about me – it will cost you two million dollars for that information!”
“I was nice enough to get you started. If you show me that you’re trying, I’ll help you out. Even if I don’t get any money from you!”
“I made a comment and you started that it must be not true, unless I can prove it by posting that proof on YWN! Your thought processes are illogical!”
thats quite logical to me. you made an amazing comment, and cant back it up seems logical to doubt you. Especially given your track record.
The rest of your post is yet again repeating my silliness. Dotn do that if you cant reply I get that just leave it out and ignore as you usually do. Reposting it w/ no reply is distracting.
feel fre to answer though
At what point does that physician encounter EMS protocols?”
Ubiq – “I never said I wanted payment for any of my comments on YWN.”
Here are some examples
“Tutoring costs money! Here’s one freebie:”
“Also I would have given you the information about my court case for free, but now that I’ve experienced your posts about me – it will cost you two million dollars for that information!”
“I was nice enough to get you started. If you show me that you’re trying, I’ll help you out. Even if I don’t get any money from you!”
You just proved that I didn’t charge anyone! Not even you!
All that changes if we go to a third place. And you already know how much it will be!
I made a comment and you started that it must be not true, unless I can prove it by posting that proof on YWN! Your thought processes are illogical!”
I only posted that to you and it was dripping in sarcasm!
Almost nothing you post is true!
“At what point does that physician encounter EMS protocols?”
I really can’t answer your questions about EMS! Like I posted previously then I’d have to charge you!
One thing I’ll do for you – to show how illogical your posts are!
“(No EMS protocols there) followed by 2 years fellowship in aLLErgy (NO EMS protocols yet again”
How do you treat anaphylaxis? Allergists give Epi.
What do you think the protocol is in EMS? They give Epi.!
Since you never learnt medicine, I’d have to charge you to teach you medicine!
Health, is everything ok? You ended a sentence with a period instead of an exclamation point. Just wanted to check up on you and make sure you’re ok!
I’m making popcorn for everyone.
first off, thanks for renaming the thread. aseems more appropriate for the subject matter and warns those who may have expected a semi normla-conversation about Trump v. hillary to stay away.
Health
“You just proved that I didn’t charge anyone!”
how is this not charging “it will cost you two million dollars for that information!”
Granted, the other examples you diditn actually charge, but the insinuation that you deserve money for sharing your thoughts is absurd.
“I made a comment and you started that it must be not true, unless I can prove it by posting that proof on YWN!”
no it must not be true because after spending an embarrasing amoutn of time looking for it, it doesnt come up. There are a finite number of SCOTUS cases that took place in 2006. none of them are about the subject at hand. Thus you lied. Seems logical to me.
“then I’d have to charge you!”
Wait, I thought you dont charge?
“How do you treat anaphylaxis? Allergists give Epi.”
by EMS protocols we were talking about triage and managing accident citims based on the number of cars involved. Of course there are some things All physicians know.
I assume you have a driver license, does that make you profecient in EMS protocols because they also know how to drive? (hint: no it doesnt)
All Physicians were at soem point in their careers ACLS certified, that doesnt mean they know EMS protocols
“I’d have to charge you to teach you medicine! “
no thanks, i’m good. Id rather get a degree from Trump University. At least there they probably wouldnt utter the silly sentence “Its a molecule not a macromolecule”
BTW here all all the SCOTUS cases from 2006.
Is your case on this list?
BP America Production Co. v. Burton No. 05-669 December 11, 2006
Carey v. Musladin No. 05-785 December 11, 2006
Toledo-Flores v. US No. 05-7664 December 5, 2006
Lopez v. Gonzales No. 05-547 December 5, 2006
Ayers v. Belmontes No. 05-5966 November 13, 2006
Purcell v. Gonzales No. 06A375 October 20, 2006
Clark v. Arizona No. 05-5966 June 29, 2006
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld No. 05-184 June 29, 2006
Beard v. Banks No. 04-1739 June 28, 2006
League Of United Latin American Citizens Et al. v. Perry, Governor Of Texas, Et al. No. 05-204 June 28, 2006
Sanchez-llamas v. Oregon No. 4-10566 June 28, 2006
Arlington Central School District Board Of Education v. Murphy Et Vir. No. 05-18 June 26, 2006
Kansas v. Marsh No. 04-1170 June 26, 2006
Randall v. Sorrell No. 04-1528 June 26, 2006
United States v. Gonzalez-lopez No. 05-352 June 26, 2006
Washington v. Recuenco No. 05-83 June 26, 2006
Burlington N. & S. F. r. co. v. White No. 05-259 June 22, 2006
Dixon v. United States No. 05-7053 June 22, 2006
Fernandez-vargas v. Gonzales No. 04-1376 June 22, 2006
Laboratory Corporation Of America Hold-ings, Dba Labcorp, Petitioner v. Metabo-lite Laboratories, Inc., Et al. No. 04-607 June 22, 2006
Woodford v. Ngo No. 05-416 June 22, 2006
Davis v. Washington No. 05-5224 June 19, 2006
Rapanos v. United States No. 04-1034 June 19, 2006
Samson v. California No. 04-9728 June 19, 2006
Youngblood v. West Virginia No. 05-6997 June 19, 2006
Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. Mcveigh No. 05-200 June 15, 2006
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co. No. 05-128 June 15, 2006
Hudson v. Michigan No. 04-1360 June 15, 2006
Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust No. 05-409 June 15, 2006
Hill v. Mcdonough No. 05-8794 June 12, 2006
House v. Bell No. 04-8990 June 12, 2006
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. No. 04-433 June 5, 2006
Mohawk Industries, Inc., Petitioner v. Shirley Williams Et al. No. 05-465 June 5, 2006
Whitman v. Department Of Transportation No. 04-1131 June 5, 2006
Zedner v. United States No. 05-5992 June 5, 2006
Northern Ins. Co. Of N. y. v. Chatham County No. 04-1618 May 30, 2006
Garcetti v. Ceballos No. 04-473 May 30, 2006
Brigham City v. Stuart No. 05-502 May 22, 2006
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno No. 04-1704 May 15, 2006
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. Of Environmental Protection No. 04-1527 May 15, 2006
Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. No. 05-260 May 15, 2006
eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L. L. C. No. 05-130 May 15, 2006
Arkansas Department Of Health And Human Services Et al. v. Ahlborn No. 04-1506 May 1, 2006
Holmes v. South Carolina No. 04-1327 May 1, 2006
Marshall v. Marshall No. 04-1544 May 1, 2006
Hartman v. Moore No. 04-1495 April 26, 2006
Jones v. Flowers No. 04-1477 April 26, 2006
Day v. Mcdonough No. 04-1324 April 25, 2006
Jeffrey Jerome Salinas v. United States No. 05-8400 April 25, 2006
Gonzales v. Thomas No. 05-552 April 17, 2006
Georgia v. Randolph No. 04-1067 March 22, 2006
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit No. 04-1371 March 21, 2006
United States v. Grubbs No. 04-1414 March 21, 2006
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. No. 04-1329 March 1, 2006
Scheidler v. National Organization For Women,inc. No. 04-1244 February 28, 2006
Texaco Inc. v. Dagher No. 04-805 February 28, 2006
Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. No. 04-944 February 22, 2006
Dolan v. Postal Service No. 04-848 February 22, 2006
Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. Mcdonald No. 04-593 February 22, 2006
Oregon v. Guzek No. 04-928 February 22, 2006
Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc. No. 05-379 February 21, 2006
Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna No. 04-1264 February 21, 2006
Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficenteuniao Do Vegetal No. 04-1084 February 21, 2006
Lance v. Dennis No. 05-555 February 21, 2006
Ministry Of Defense And Support For Armedforces Of Islamic Republic Of Iran v. Elahi No. 04-1095 February 21, 2006
Central Va. Community College v. Katz No. 04-885 January 23, 2006
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-eckrich, Inc. No. 04-597 January 23, 2006
Rice v. Collins No. 04-52 January 18, 2006
Will v. Hallock No. 04-1332 January 18, 2006
Gonzales v. Oregon No. 04-623 January 17, 2006
Brown v. Sanders No. 04-980 January 11, 2006
Evans v. Chavis No. 04-721 January 10, 2006
United States v. Georgia No. 04-1203 January 10, 2006
Ubiq -“Health
“You just proved that I didn’t charge anyone!”
how is this not charging “it will cost you two million dollars for that information!”
I thought you understand English?!?
If you want the court case from me, it will cost you 2 mil. I’m not going to give it here on YWN!
Post your email if you’re interested and we’ll do the deal!
If not, so long!
“Granted, the other examples you diditn actually charge, but the insinuation that you deserve money for sharing your thoughts is absurd.”
Mister it’s not my thoughts that I’m charging for, but my court case or my medical knowledge!
“no it must not be true because after spending an embarrasing amoutn of time looking for it, it doesnt come up. There are a finite number of SCOTUS cases that took place in 2006. none of them are about the subject at hand. Thus you lied. Seems logical to me.”
No, you couldn’t find it, because you’re incompetent! But I posted this already to you!
“then I’d have to charge you!”
“Wait, I thought you dont charge?”
I don’t charge here on YWN! Do you have a problem understanding English?!?
“How do you treat anaphylaxis? Allergists give Epi.”
“by EMS protocols we were talking about triage and managing accident citims based on the number of cars involved. Of course there are some things All physicians know.
I assume you have a driver license, does that make you profecient in EMS protocols because they also know how to drive? (hint: no it doesnt)
All Physicians were at soem point in their careers ACLS certified, that doesnt mean they know EMS protocols”
We talking about triage & MVA’s in the other topic, not here!
“I have NO knowledge about EMS protocols”
The above post isn’t from s/o who practices or did practice medicine!!!
This includes protocols about allergies!
Ubiq -“BTW here all all the SCOTUS cases from 2006.
Is your case on this list?”
No clown! Where did you get this list from?
Now you proved that you’re incompetent in medicine and in legal matters!!!
health, you make me laugh!
All the name callings can easily be redirected at you, in fact you prove to be the uneducated and childish silly posts.
As proven numerous times, you would be paid NOT to teach or share your thoughts.
“I thought you understand English?!?”
I do this : “If you want the court case from me, it will cost you 2 mil” is called chargine. When you said “I dont charge” that was yet another of many many lies you have told.
“Post your email if you’re interested and we’ll do the deal!
If not, so long!”
I’m not I wouldnt spend money for a real court case and certainly not for a fake one. goodbye.
As 2scents put it so well “”As proven numerous times, you would be paid NOT to teach or share your thoughts.” Your thought are nonsensical, illogical and often contradictory, and your “facts” are wrong and/or made up. No wonder you like trump.
“I don’t charge here on YWN! Do you have a problem understanding English?!?”
I guess so. I understand this : “Mister it’s not my thoughts that I’m charging for, but my court case or my medical knowledge!” as charging.
and no neither are worth anything.
“We talking about triage & MVA’s in the other topic, not here!”
what other EMS protocol where we ever talking about?
“This includes protocols about allergies!”
what? that isnt an EMS protocol. If it is then yes I guess I do no some EMS protocols. Im ACLS certified too, that wasnt what we were talkign about either. Sorry if that wasnt clear.
“No clown! Where did you get this list from?”
Everywhere I looked. Sadly I dont have access to secret supreme court cases
It’s finally confirmed! Hillary is a robot!
She short circuited and now she overheated!
In human language we call it being dehydrated, computers overheat
2scents or No sense -“health, you make me laugh!”
And your posts are very sad!
“All the name callings can easily be redirected at you, in fact you prove to be the uneducated and childish silly posts.”
Does this post apply to you also, or only to me, Mr. Hatzolah?!?
From the topic called -“Treatment”:
2scents -“Mr Health, you are a big fool! since you are using personal insults as a response, you have no clue who I am or if I have any degree in medicine.”
“As proven numerous times, you would be paid NOT to teach or share your thoughts.
So to answer your question, Why I think that you have no experience in emergency medicine, that is because you have established a fact, pushed everyone to the ground and resorted to personal insults YET ARE UNABLE TO SIMPLY POINT TO THE SOURCE!!
Btw, whoever mentioned narcan for AMS, really doesnt know emergency medicine, assuming that the only presenting medical is AMS the patient should NOT get narcan, as long as the patient as a patent airway and spontaneously breathing with no cardiovascular compromise”
Are all the Hatzolah guys also so incompetent like you?!?
From WikiEM (from Harbor Medical Center):
Not just guys who play on ambulances!
“Altered Mental Status:
Treatment
Patients with focal findings may have surgically treatable cause
Coma cocktail
Glucose, thiamine, naloxone
Treat underlying cause”
Should I take the time and effort to respond to your copy/paste??
would it satisfy you if I can kneel down to your level and explain it to you while providing real literature, not just copy paste tidbits of information from a website?
Ubiq -“”If you want the court case from me, it will cost you 2 mil” is called chargine. When you said “I dont charge” that was yet another of many many lies you have told.”
I posted many times that’s on YWN only!
Obviously you don’t understand English!
I also posted this:
“All that changes if we go to a third place.”
“No clown! Where did you get this list from?”
“Everywhere I looked. Sadly I dont have access to secret supreme court cases”
Like I posted before – you can’t find it because you only asked a student!
I’m not going to discuss my court case anymore, but to show e/o who’s the liar around here – I’ll say this:
Almost all the SCOTUS case numbers that you just posted start with either 04 or 05, not with 06!
Mister – Stop with your lying – it’s Elul!!!
“you can’t find it because you only asked a student!”
And like all your comments this too is wrong.
As I said earlier I asked 2 lawyers too. Besides, student are better at searching (arguably) , since that what he does all the time.
All agreed you were a liar (and not a good one at that)
“Almost all the SCOTUS case numbers that you just posted start with either 04 or 05, not with 06!
Mister – Stop with your lying – it’s Elul!!!”
Easy with the ignorance, this isnt basic science that we know you know nothing about. This is basic checking dates You said the case was decided in 06′ those are the cases I posted.
As an aside I checked all cases argued in 06 too even if decisions delivered later (which isnt what you said). None of them are about the topic at hand either.
Are you sure it was the Supreme court, Are you sure it wasnt imaginary?
2scents -“Should I take the time and effort to respond to your copy/paste??
would it satisfy you if I can kneel down to your level and explain it to you while providing real literature, not just copy paste tidbits of information from a website?”
I’m not sure what your implication of “real literature” is!
I assure e/o WikiEM from Harbor Medical Center is real and that’s the way they practice medicine!
If you have an opposing opinion from a reliable source, surely you can post it! I’m not the one who is resorting to lies to defend themselves!
Ubiq -“”Easy with the ignorance, this isnt basic science that we know you know nothing about. This is basic checking dates You said the case was decided in 06′ those are the cases I posted.
As an aside I checked all cases argued in 06 too even if decisions delivered later (which isnt what you said). None of them are about the topic at hand either.
Are you sure it was the Supreme court, Are you sure it wasnt imaginary?”
Unfortunately your ignorance is a big joke! I’m not going to explain to you how they post their decisions! You can continue to dream on!
I already told you how you can get my case and how much it will cost you!
You can stop asking me questions – I’m not going to respond anymore to your delusions!!!
Dearest health,
“I’m not going to explain to you how they post their decisions!”
Thanks for sparing me. If I wanted wrong information I can make it up on my own
“I already told you how you can get my case and how much it will cost you!”
And I already told you I dont pay for fake information. Especially not to someone who claims he doesnt charge in the first place
“You can stop asking me questions – I’m not going to respond anymore”
Lol, you haveent been responding to dozens of my questions. But I get they where hard questions. Like getting you to reconcile all your dozens of contradictory opinions
Health,
That’s not a source, it’s not even a complete sentence!
You can just copy paste a few words without the context, this does not warrant a response. You fail to respond with any logic or sources to your claims, you put in so much time and effort in your foolish posts, yet whenever asked for a follow up logic to back your claims, your response is that you will do it for money.. Not even funny anymore.
Ubiq -“Dearest health,
“I’m not going to explain to you how they post their decisions!”
Thanks for sparing me. If I wanted wrong information I can make it up on my own”
You’re right and you do! Why does the truth bother you so much?!?
I know because you can never be wrong! So I hurt your ego – Nebach!
“And I already told you I dont pay for fake information. Especially not to someone who claims he doesnt charge in the first place”
And that was at the beginning, when I didn’t know how obnoxious your posts could be! And for the umteenth time, my case went to the Supreme Court! And I’m not giving it to you for free!
2scents -“Health,
That’s not a source, it’s not even a complete sentence!
You can just copy paste a few words without the context, this does not warrant a response. You fail to respond with any logic or sources to your claims, you put in so much time and effort in your foolish posts, yet whenever asked for a follow up logic to back your claims, your response is that you will do it for money.. Not even funny anymore.”
OK Fool. Here’s the whole protocol:
Btw, I didn’t charge you any money!
But I want to know is every Hatzolah guy as incompetent as you?!?
Maybe you’re the best they have to offer?!?
From W-EM:
“Altered Mental Status
Background
Alteration of arousal or content of consciousness or both
Both cerebral cortices or brainstem must be affected
Delirium vs dementia vs psych
Must quickly determine if coma is from diffuse or focal impairment
Peds
Most common causes are toxic ingestion, infection, and child-abuse induced trauma
Clinical Features
Depends on cause
Diffuse brain dysfunction – lack of focal findings
Focal brain dysfunction – hemiparesis, loss of motor tone, loss of ocular reflexes
Differential Diagnosis
Altered mental status
Diffuse brain dysfunction
Encephalopathies
Hypoxic encephalopathy
Acute toxic-metabolic encephalopathy (Delirium)
Hypoglycemia
Hyperosmolar state (e.g., hyperglycemia)
Electrolyte Abnormalities (hypernatremia or hyponatremia, hypercalcemia)
Organ system failure
Hepatic Encephalopathy
Uremia/Renal Failure
Endocrine (Addison’s disease, hypothyroidism)
Hypoxia
CO2 narcosis
Hypertensive Encephalopathy
Toxins
Drug reactions (NMS)
Environmental causes
Hypothermia
Hyperthermia
Deficiency state
Wernicke encephalopathy
Sepsis
Primary CNS disease or trauma
Direct CNS trauma
Diffuse axonal injury
Subdural/epidural hematoma
Vascular disease
Intraparenchymal hemorrhage
SAH
Infarction
Hemispheric, brainstem
CNS infections
Encephalitis
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis
Neoplasms
Seizures
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus
Postictal state
Psychiatric
Acute psychosis
Malingering
Diagnosis
AMS Workup
Point of care glucose
CBC
Chemistry
LFTs
UA
CXR
Utox
EKG
Head CT
?Blood and urine cultures
?Ammonia level
?Tylenol/Aspirin level
?LP
?Serum Osm
?Coags
?Cortisol
?ABG/VBG
Treatment
Patients with focal findings may have surgically treatable cause
Coma cocktail
Glucose, thiamine, naloxone
Treat underlying cause
Disposition
Most frequently admission, unless of a chronic and known etiology
See Also
Toxicology (Main)
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Altered Mental Status (AMS) (Peds)
AVPU Scale
Brain Death
References
This page was last modified 19:09, 16 December 2015″
“Why does the truth bother you so much?!?”
What truth are you talking about?
“I know because you can never be wrong!”
Haven’t we been over this?
Incidently, that was one of the dozens of questions you have yet to answer. Namely, why do you keep repeating that when I amoved occasionally (though rarely) wrong?
“And for the umteenth time, my case went to the Supreme Court!”
Got it, sorry I thought you meant the US Supreme Court, I didn’t realize you meant the supreme Court of the land of make believe.
” And I’m not giving it to you for free!”
OK sold! I’ll give you 2 unicorns for the fake info
Ubiq -“What truth are you talking about?”
That I had Court case that went to the US Supreme Court!!!
“Haven’t we been over this?
Incidently, that was one of the dozens of questions you have yet to answer. Namely, why do you keep repeating that when I amoved occasionally (though rarely) wrong?”
You admitted that you can be wrong, but I was talking whether I had a case to SCOTUS! You should stop posting to me pretending that you’re an imbecile! You knew exactly what I meant & what I was referring to, when I said “never”!
“Got it, sorry I thought you meant the US Supreme Court, I didn’t realize you meant the supreme Court of the land of make believe.”
Stop with your stupidity! See above!
” And I’m not giving it to you for free!”
“OK sold! I’ll give you 2 unicorns for the fake info”
I said two million dollars for my real SCOTUS case!
You’re too chicken to bite!!!
“That I had Court case that went to the US Supreme Court!!!”
You dont make any sense. Why would that bother me? (You had asked “Why does the truth bother you so much?!?”) I want it to be true. I have been trying to get hints from you to get you to help me find it, I asked friends to help, I skimmed through all cases from the year you claimed the decision was handed down in an effort to find it. I have spent an embarrassing amount of time searching for it and an even more embarrassing amount of time discussing it with you. Why would it bother me if the case existed? IT would have been a success on my part. sadly after exhausting all of the above, the case simply doesn’t exist. Real SCOTUS cases aren’t this hard to find. We arent talking about some obscure court. The supreme court is the highest court in this country (at this point i the conversation I cant be sure you know that), cases they decide are not secret.
I still hope I turn out to be wrong, it means I wouldn’t have wasted my time and this interesting court decision actually took place. Sadly though I am now certain that this isnt the case.
” You should stop posting to me pretending that you’re an imbecile!”
Hey, thats not nice rmeber I’m senile! (I guess I’m not the only one…)
“You knew exactly what I meant & what I was referring to, when I said “never”!”
i’m still not sure. you said it several times, and claimed that you havent said it. Can I sometimes be wrong or not?
“You’re too chicken to bite!!!”
More chicken than the guy who refuses to back up his claim with the court case he claims happened? And besides Im offering something better than 2 million dollars, namely 2 unicorns (each is worth 5 million dollars which in the land of make believe equals $64 million)
Ubiq -“want it to be true. I have been trying to get hints from you to get you to help me find it, I asked friends to help, I skimmed through all cases from the year you claimed the decision was handed down in an effort to find it. I have spent an embarrassing amount of time searching for it and an even more embarrassing amount of time discussing it with you. Why would it bother me if the case existed?”
At this point you definitely don’t want it to be true! It’s your ego at stake! And since I put a very expensive price on it, I doubt you’ll get it from me!
“You knew exactly what I meant & what I was referring to, when I said “never”!”
“i’m still not sure. you said it several times, and claimed that you havent said it. Can I sometimes be wrong or not?”
Yes, you can be wrong, but my point to you is you put so much invested that I’m in the wrong regarding my SCOTUS case, you’ll never admit it!
Since I’m almost sure you aren’t going to get from me, since I’m charging a little fortune! But good luck on finding it! My advice to you is to change the lawyers (liars) you’ve been using so far!
“At this point you definitely don’t want it to be true!”
Not quite At this point Ive realized it doesnt matter anymore what I want or how long I look. I simply doesnt exist. Think of a guy who spends time looking for the Loch ness monster after looking for a while and turning up empty he gives up .It would be nice if the monster suddenly showed itself even if he couldnt find it, since at least he didnt waste time on something nonexistent.
At this point it is far more likely that the loch ness monster exists than your court case.
“my point to you is you put so much invested that I’m in the wrong regarding my SCOTUS case, you’ll never admit it!”
You expect me to admit im wrong when I and several lawyers and law students cant find it? Does that make sense?
” But good luck on finding it!”
Ill pass,My search is complete. Ive skimmed all cases from 2006 I can state with more certainty than the loch ness monster not existing, that your case doesnt exist.
“My advice to you is to change the lawyers (liars) you’ve been using so far!”
Lol! I tried that.
Besides, you dont need lawyers to find a supreme court case. Especially when you narrow down the year
Does anybody other than the two participants read this thread any more?
sigh… yes
Sorry, I forgot about the poor moderators who are obligated to read every post. My sympathies.
thank you
I also sympathize with them.
Say, I could help out by relieving you for a couple days and volunteering to do your modding while you can relax.
So maybe mods since this isn’t getting anywhere you give it a rest. Someone’s blood pressure levels may be at stake.
Or maybe they’re both actually enjoying it and it’s keeping them from stressing about other stuff? Can you two perhaps enlighten us?
“Does anybody other than the two participants read this thread any more?”
I hope not (aside from the mods). The title offers plenty of warning.
As for the mods. Thanks for your time and patience. I guess I never thought of it from your perspective. If it poses a burden I’m done. I assumed these posts just required a quick skimming, as other than an insult here and there it is a pretty pareve discussion.
Regardless, thanks for letting me have some fun
Or maybe they’re both actually enjoying it and it’s keeping them from stressing about other stuff? Can you two perhaps enlighten us?
Gladly! I find it fascinating when someone can be so clearly wrong yet insist he is right. Those are strangely my favorite discussions. A discussion about say, Hillary vs Trump isnt as clear cut (if we are being honest. Both have plusses and minuses. If we are being honest it is a bit subjective as to who is “better” even if you are sure you are right,there is room for doubt and healthy disagreement.
however something black and white like whether a Supreme court decision took place, whether there is a difference in existing protocols between number of cars involved in MVA and management of pt, or whether mRNA is a macro-molecule. It amazes me that people can actually argue about it.
Its why I enjoy listening to talk radio. So much of what they say is demonstrably false, but it doesnt matter they are so sure of themselves and they need to fill air-time so they spew nonsense. I find it fascinating.
Though admittedly. my fascination with this thread as worn off, and at this point it is mostly just pathologic as I seem to have trouble just letting it go.
Ubiq -“however something black and white like whether a Supreme court decision took place, whether there is a difference in existing protocols between number of cars involved in MVA and managements of pt, or whether mRNA is a macro-molecule. It amazes me that people can actually argue about it.”
Regarding the court it is black and white, and you and your buddies are incompetent! Actually at this point I really don’t think you asked any real lawyers!
As far as MVA’S, you yourself admitted that you don’t know EMS protocols.
As far as biology goes, I admitted I made a mistake.
When are you going to admit your two mistakes regarding SCOTUS & MVA’s?!?
Ubiq -“Not quite At this point Ive realized it doesnt matter anymore what I want or how long I look. I simply doesnt exist. Think of a guy who spends time looking for the Loch ness monster after looking for a while and turning up empty he gives up .It would be nice if the monster suddenly showed itself even if he couldnt find it, since at least he didnt waste time on something nonexistent.
At this point it is far more likely that the loch ness monster exists than your court case.”
Your posts are getting more ridiculous as time goes on; actually they’re pathological!
“You expect me to admit im wrong when I and several lawyers and law students cant find it? Does that make sense?”
I already told you if you really had real lawyers try to find it, get different ones!
“Ill pass,My search is complete. Ive skimmed all cases from 2006 I can state with more certainty than the loch ness monster not existing, that your case doesnt exist.”
Obviously not, because you didn’t find it!
“Lol! I tried that.
Besides, you dont need lawyers to find a supreme court case. Especially when you narrow down the year”
Yes, you do because you don’t know what’s posted and what’s not!
I never have met such a haughty person as you!
And btw, my offer still stands – for 2 million dollars, you’ll have my whole court case!
Thanks Ubiq for your detailed reply.
“Regarding the court it is black and white, and you and your buddies are incompetent! Actually at this point I really don’t think you asked any real lawyers!”
you dont need to eb a lwayer to find a SCOTUS case. HAvent we been over this. You may not know this, but SCOTUS is the highest court in the land. They hear (relatively) few cases and they are readily available and easily searchable
“As far as MVA’S, you yourself admitted that you don’t know EMS protocols.”
Yes, and you admitted and retracted that you made that one up.
“As far as biology goes, I admitted I made a mistake.”
Amazing! I know how hard that was for you Im so proud. Though my point was why I enjoyed discussing it. Once you admitted you made it up I stopped discussing it (you continued by mixing in this thread saying I “never” admit when wrong)
“When are you going to admit your two mistakes regarding SCOTUS & MVA’s?!?”
The second I find the case you claim exists or the EMS protocol you claimed existed.
“Your posts are getting more ridiculous as time goes on; actually they’re pathological!”
Agreed. but not for the reason you think.
“I already told you if you really had real lawyers try to find it, get different ones!”
I tried that already.
“Yes, you do because you don’t know what’s posted and what’s not!”
all SCOTUS cases are published. Secret supreme court cases arent a real thing.
“I never have met such a haughty person as you!”
you should meet this guy :
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/organic-chemistry-and-or-a-and-p/page/2#post-625518
“And btw, my offer still stands – for 2 million dollars, you’ll have my whole court case!
As does mine, 2 unicorns for the case
Ubiq -“you dont need to eb a lwayer to find a SCOTUS case. HAvent we been over this. You may not know this, but SCOTUS is the highest court in the land. They hear (relatively) few cases and they are readily available and easily searchable”
They are not all available for any imbecile to find!
That’s what I keep telling you, but you’re too stubborn to listen!
As far as MVA’S, you yourself admitted that you don’t know EMS protocols.”
“Yes, and you admitted and retracted that you made that one up.”
This line is the clincher! You posted previously that you nothing about EMS protocols! So why don’t you admit this with MVA’S?!?
“When are you going to admit your two mistakes regarding SCOTUS & MVA’s?!?”
“The second I find the case you claim exists or the EMS protocol you claimed existed.”
No you won’t! And that’s because that will tarnish your tremendous Ego!
“I already told you if you really had real lawyers try to find it, get different ones!”
“I tried that already.”
Didn’t your Mommy ever teach you Not to lie?!?
“As does mine, 2 unicorns for the case”
I’m not interested in two old Shofars, that you’re passing off as unicorns!!!
“They are not all available for any imbecile to find!”
Wrong, you are confusing secret supreme court with the US supreme court.
“That’s what I keep telling you, but you’re too stubborn to listen!”
Just becasue you keep saying it doesnt make it true. It was a lie 6 pages ago and is still a lie.
“This line is the clincher! You posted previously that you nothing about EMS protocols!”
Still true. I dont, and neither do you. Driving around an access-a-ride doesnt make you knowledgeable about EMS protocols
” So why don’t you admit this with MVA’S?!?”
. the discussion was whether there existed a difference between 1 and 2 car MVA’s. You claimed there was a difference but couldnt source it. I said I do not know, but it sounded strange. however once iot became clear that no such protocol existed, You dont have to know about protocols to know that when you made up that it existed you were lying. (You addmited this at one point in th thread, but were spewing so much nonsense you forgot you addmited it, much like you forgot that you agreed with the US suprme court in your “case”)
“No you won’t!”
Yet another lie from Health.
“Didn’t your Mommy ever teach you Not to lie?!?”
she did, but Im senile so I forgot. Remember?
“I’m not interested in two old Shofars,”
Ah but these unicorns have 3 horns each so it is 6 shofars for your imaginary case!!!!!! (one exclamatiion for each shofar!!!!!!)
BTW for the sake of reality
Section 701J was ammended by Congress in 1972 (not by the court ass you indicated at one point)
Earlier I wasnt sure when this amendment was added and conceded that it wasnt present in the original law passed in 1964
You eventually agreed that regardless when added it was present when your alleged case took place. so this doesnt really change anything
here it is again:
apologies for raising the intellectualness of this thread ever so slightly
Ubiq -“Wrong, you are confusing secret supreme court with the US supreme court.”
FYI, there is no secret court, just something that you made up in your delusion!
“Just becasue you keep saying it doesnt make it true. It was a lie 6 pages ago and is still a lie.”
Stop talking to yourself!
” So why don’t you admit this with MVA’S?!?”
“the discussion was whether there existed a difference between 1 and 2 car MVA’s. You claimed there was a difference but couldnt source it.”
I’m not interested in trying to explain it, because it’s a waste of time!
You nothing about EMS protocols, your words, not mine!
I’m sure you have to go now, because it’s supper time in the nursing home!
BTW for the sake of reality
Section 701J was ammended by Congress in 1972 (not by the court as you indicated at one point)
Earlier I wasnt sure when this amendment was added and conceded that it wasnt present in the original law passed in 1964
You eventually agreed that regardless when added it was present when your alleged case took place. so this doesnt really change anything
here it is again:
apologies for raising the intellectualness of this thread ever so slightly
“I also sympathize with them.
Say, I could help out by relieving you for a couple days and volunteering to do your modding while you can relax.”
I’ll help! As long as I don’t have to read through the boring threads like this one and all the science, legal and political ones.
“FYI, there is no secret court, just something that you made up in your delusion!”
I made up?
“Stop talking to yourself!”
Cant its part of my condition
“I’m not interested in trying to explain it, because it’s a waste of time!”
good.
“You nothing about EMS protocols, your words, not mine!”
Yes Ive said that many times, and neither due you. However our discussion there wasnt about eMS protocols. It was about whether you made them up or not. and since you couldnt provide the source. IT is rather clear that you made them up
“I’m sure you have to go now, because it’s supper time in the nursing home!”
Oyyyyy supper was at 4:30 Ive been having so much fun with you I completely forgot. Or maybe its my senility
Ubiq -“”BTW for the sake of reality
Section 701J was ammended by Congress in 1972 (not by the court as you indicated at one point)
Earlier I wasnt sure when this amendment was added and conceded that it wasnt present in the original law passed in 1964
You eventually agreed that regardless when added it was present when your alleged case took place. so this doesnt really change anything
here it is again:
You really don’t know the meaning of reality! Finally at the end you admitted that you don’t know anything about the discrimination law! The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!
Next time, remind me, when I see one your SN’s to stay far away.
That’s right you don’t know anything, except molecule and macromolecule!
“apologies for raising the intellectualness of this thread ever so slightly”
Don’t worry, you could not possibly raise any intellect on this thread, because from the beginning to your very last post you have demonstrated that your knowledge about every subject (except macromolecule) is so minimal, it’s pathetic!!!
Oy more lies 🙁
” Finally at the end you admitted that you don’t know anything about the discrimination law”
Ive admited no such thing. This too is a lie.
All I was adding is that earlier while I did not know when it was amended I found it now.
On the other hand you had said the supreme court amended it (wrong thats not what the court does), after your case (wrong you claim your case was 2006 this was in 1972 which in the real world is before 2006, though perhaps the world of secret supreme court, time works differently).
Of course you also didnt know what gave the court the right to interpret the law. SO I find it amusing when you claim someone else is lacking in knowledge on the subject.
“The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!”
This discussion was about 30 different things. And yes OVer the course of >200 posts Ive educated you somehwat on the subject and you have hopefully learnt a few things along the way (like the role of the court for example) We were Mostly focusing on how you so obviously make things up and think you are fooling anyone.
“Next time, remind me, when I see one your SN’s to stay far away.”
Nooo but we were having so much fun, and youve learnt so much. And besides , sigh I’ll probably forget to remind you becasue of my senility
“That’s right you don’t know anything, except molecule and macromolecule!”
Ah but I also knew mRNA was a nucleic acid which you didnt know. and of course I ve taught you much about how the legal system works including the role of the court and that there is no such thing as secret supreme court cases. And finaly I also know that your Case never took place
Anyone who ever had a thought that being a Mod is a cakewalk, should stumble onto this thread. Like I just did.
The problem is obvious:
They both want to have the last word. And will no way allow the other guy to have the last word.
I humbly offer the Mods a possible solution:
Close the thread after you post this post. Since it’s impossible to satisfy both parties by giving them both the last word, your best bet might just be giving neither of them the last word.
You’re welcome.
Sage advice, as always, but honestly it isn’t bothering me. Better a bicker between two posters than jabs and insults to factions of Jews, ya know?
😉
Kol hakavod!
Lol Golfer, I see you too want the last word
“Close the thread after you post this post.”
Though I dont get why this bothers anyone.
Granted its one of the stranger threads in this forum , but the title offers plenty warning.
If it bothered the mods (And while I do appreciate the forum, I dont see why it should bother any mod all they need to do is skim the posts all of which have been posted already several times), they know they can close it. Why mix in?
Thanks mod 29.
Ubiq -“”Ive admited no such thing.”
Sure you did! You can’t be that senile that you don’t even remember the post from a few lines ago!
“This too is a lie.”
What is a lie? Remember only you’re the liar around here!
“On the other hand you had said the supreme court amended it (wrong thats not what the court does), after your case (wrong you claim your case was 2006 this was in 1972 which in the real world is before 2006, though perhaps the world of secret supreme court, time works differently).”
Stop confusing yourself! Did you forget to take your Aricept today?!?
“Of course you also didnt know what gave the court the right to interpret the law. SO I find it amusing when you claim someone else is lacking in knowledge on the subject.”
The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!”
Really – so if any of your lines is a smidgen true, it wouldn’t have gone past the first federal court! It would have been thrown out as frivolous!
“This discussion was about 30 different things. And yes OVer the course of >200 posts Ive educated you somehwat on the subject and you have hopefully learnt a few things along the way (like the role of the court for example) We were Mostly focusing on how you so obviously make things up and think you are fooling anyone.”
Oh you educated me a lot about yourself! Pity though – I once thought you were smart!
Mods – you don’t need any more of his Shtus!
I know some of the posters here hang onto your every word – like it’s from Har Sinai!
Stop manipulating them!
Btw, I really want to thank you, because I haven’t searched for my court case in a long time, but because of you I did it again.
And I found out they study it in law schools!
Too bad your (make believe) friends don’t go to the famous ones!!!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.