Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Soccer role model
- This topic has 42 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by sirvoddmort.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 21, 2014 5:52 pm at 5:52 pm #613966lamud vov tzadikParticipant
Who’s your favorite football player ie the one you look up to as some sort of role model?
October 21, 2014 6:03 pm at 6:03 pm #1066454☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantShlomo Veingrad
October 21, 2014 6:03 pm at 6:03 pm #1066455👑RebYidd23ParticipantFreddy the pig.
October 21, 2014 6:04 pm at 6:04 pm #1066456zahavasdadParticipantThe Goq
Shlomo Veinrgad went from being a Tackle for the Green Bay Packers and Dallas Cowboys to becoming a Baal Teshuva and now does Kiruv for Lubavich especially with his football backround he is a sought after speaker
October 21, 2014 6:14 pm at 6:14 pm #1066457TheGoqParticipantI admire the skill of high level athletes and i cheer for the ones who play for my team I in no way look at them as role models.
October 21, 2014 6:29 pm at 6:29 pm #1066458lamud vov tzadikParticipantI don’t think shlomo veingrad plays anymore there was an big article about him in zman yet he’s defintely a good one to chose.
October 21, 2014 6:36 pm at 6:36 pm #1066459TheGoqParticipantI know who he is ZD and i admire him for what he has accomplished after his football career not necessarily during but maybe thats just cause i hate the packers.
October 21, 2014 6:47 pm at 6:47 pm #1066460screwdriverdelightParticipantI look up to all football players, no matter what, and I don’t think we should pick favorites.
October 21, 2014 6:51 pm at 6:51 pm #1066461lamud vov tzadikParticipantMy favorite would most probably be Lionel messi as I think he’s got the most talent of any players out there also liverpools striker this season made a big shout of himself what’s he called suarez I think, he’s is the best player in the English premier league.
October 21, 2014 7:39 pm at 7:39 pm #1066462jewishfeminist02MemberI would say Tim Tebow. It’s always inspiring to see a major athlete hold on to his faith and abstain from indulgent behaviors despite tremendous peer pressure. Even if his is the “wrong” faith, I still admire him. I wouldn’t say he’s a role model for me per se, but for all the little boys out there who do hold up athletes as role models, he would be a great one to choose.
October 21, 2014 8:05 pm at 8:05 pm #1066463zahavasdadParticipantLionel Messi is a Soccer player not a Football player and he is an Anti-Semetic player at that
October 21, 2014 8:56 pm at 8:56 pm #1066464sirvoddmortMemberLionel Messi is a Soccer player not a Football player
Football – A sport played by kicking a spherical object, a.k.a a ball, with your foot. Hence the name football.
American Football – A sport played by throwing an oval object, with your hands.
And before some pedant begins harking on about Soccer being called such by the English, or any other of the inhabitants of this planet who have the good sense to recognize a beautiful game when they see one (this excludes those of the American persuasion), the name soccer comes from Association Football, meaning the original, and true name of the beautiful game is, and always has been, football.
And if anyone wishes to persist in erroneously referring to the less exciting version of rugby with the moniker ‘Football’, please preface it with the words ‘American’, allowing all of us not of that persuasion to recognize the poster’s nationality, give them a wide berth and allow them back to discussing their far inferior form of ‘sport’.
October 21, 2014 8:59 pm at 8:59 pm #1066465sirvoddmortMemberAnd before someone bothers to mention that the official name of rugby is Rugby Football, that is only due to it’s being an offshoot of true football. American Football, being a further offshoot, certainly cannot claim the name ‘football’ to the exclusion of the original, true game, as recognized by the world’s thinking inhabitants (everywhere except the US of A).
October 21, 2014 9:07 pm at 9:07 pm #1066466sirvoddmortMemberAnd to sum up, the game of Football (or Soccer according to our linguistically challenged cousins), whilst interesting and enjoyable to participate in and watch, is generally played by the sort of character you would not wish to meet in a dark alley, or a brightly lit road for that matter. They are certainly not worth emulating in any fashion.
I can only assume the partially hidden one who started this thread is attempting to make a joke, or at least incredibly misinformed. This being due to several factual inaccuracies. Firstly, Luis Suarez has thrice bitten other players on the field of play, repeatedly cheats and abuses others, and is currently serving a lengthy ban, and, on top of that, plays for Barcelona, not Liverpool. He is probably one of the most reprehensible human beings alive today. And Lionel Messi, despite being an excellent player, is not a role model by anybody’s standards.
And as regards American Rugby Football, whilst I am not particularly knowledgeable regarding this subject, I can only assume they too are anything but role models. At least if OJ Simpson is anything to go by.
October 21, 2014 9:27 pm at 9:27 pm #1066467FriendInFlatbushParticipantPeyton Manning
October 21, 2014 10:02 pm at 10:02 pm #1066468YOSSI151ParticipantTyler Clutts from the Dallas Cowboys. How can you not like a Clutts?
I tell my kids, even a Clutts can play football. Wow – How inspirational it is.
October 21, 2014 10:16 pm at 10:16 pm #1066469👑RebYidd23ParticipantLanguage evolves. The word football means American Football in the American language.
October 21, 2014 10:17 pm at 10:17 pm #1066470BTGuyParticipantAny of the great champions of the past and present can be fantastic role models for their dedication, perseverance, working as a member of a team, and getting back up to win after failure. Specific names may vary from fan to fan.
October 22, 2014 12:12 am at 12:12 am #1066471sirvoddmortMemberLanguage evolves. The word football means American Football in the American language.
‘The American language’? Last I checked, you didn’t have a language of your own. The day you’re able to come up with one by yourselves and not butcher someone else’s, you can call your parody of a sport whatever you want. And, as I said, if you wish to have an ‘american football’ discussion, please call it by it’s full name, so that the rest of us (i.e. everywhere except America) can understand. Oh, and the initial poster, the partially hidden one, whilst misinformed, meant real football, hence Lionel Messi.
Oh, and to reiterate, none of them are role models.
October 22, 2014 1:55 am at 1:55 am #1066473Sam2ParticipantThis thread is a D’Oraisa violation of Lo S’chonem, right?
October 22, 2014 3:41 am at 3:41 am #1066474showjoeParticipantas i pointed out elsewhere, most cr posters are american, therefore stam football=american football
October 22, 2014 3:43 am at 3:43 am #1066475☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantNot all of it, I hope, Sam.
October 22, 2014 10:17 am at 10:17 am #1066476sirvoddmortMemberPerhaps most CR posters are American, and feel free to use the words sidewalk instead of pavement, pants instead of trousers, or whatever corruption of the english language you think of next. The rest of us will accpet that.
But when the topic is started by somebody who very obviously means real Football (or Soccer), it is too much to expect that the significant minority of non-American posters must have to conform.
Judging by the number of posts last Friday, and the Friday before, not to mention the numerous obviously non-American posters, a sizable number of posters are not from the USA. A bit of common courtesy could be extended by those of the American persuasion, and calling the name of your game by it’s full title would help immensely.
Besides, I was perfectly content to not be moicheh when you were discussing the matter of american ‘football’ between yourselves without specifying, even though this is not what the thread was about (see the thread starters later post). But when an attempt is made to prevent everybody else from referring to Football (Soccer) by it’s proper name, it is too much to assume that we must refer to it as ‘soccer’, as opposed to it’s real name.
So if everybody could please call both sports by their official names, as recognized worldwide, this would avoid confusion and keep harmony between posters on this international frum forum.
October 22, 2014 12:05 pm at 12:05 pm #1066477zahavasdadParticipantFYI Soccer IS the real name and it comes from Britain not the US
The real name of “European Football” is Association Football, which got shortend to Assoc , which became Soc and now soccer. It was the British who made up the word Soccer, not the americans
October 22, 2014 5:43 pm at 5:43 pm #1066478sirvoddmortMemberYes, we made up the word, as I said before, but it is only a slang word for football. Worldwide, the sport is known as football, and as that is what it has always been called, it shall remain so. I am not asking you to call American football gridiron or whatever. Football is, as you yourself have pointed out, the true name of soccer. Everyone calls it that, and, seeing how it more accurately describes our game than yours, and that we got there first, and that we invented the whole language, in an international conversation respect the facts.
October 22, 2014 5:49 pm at 5:49 pm #1066479sirvoddmortMemberAnd the ‘Association’ part of Association Football refers to the fact that the rules are codified. The key part of the name, as most people recognize is Football, and first come…
October 22, 2014 6:04 pm at 6:04 pm #1066480BTGuyParticipantFootball = NFL style play
Soccer = What those other countries do chasing and kicking the ball to each other.
There is no term “American Soccer” so by default it is best to use football to mean the oblong pigskin, and soccer to mean that round black and white ball kids use around the world.
Also, sirvoddmort, America does have a language of it’s own. It’s called Spanish. But before Spanish hit the mainstream, EVERY language was borne of stock that predated the language anyone speaks now.
Thank heaven, the Americans do not speak the “Kings English”, to a large degree.
Ironically, sirvoddmort, America still is heavy on ounces and pounds, etc., while kingly influenced countries have moved to metric.
October 22, 2014 6:14 pm at 6:14 pm #1066481👑RebYidd23ParticipantThere is an American language. It’s called American English, but it’s really not English. It’s American, which makes it a thousand times better than English.
October 22, 2014 6:36 pm at 6:36 pm #1066482screwdriverdelightParticipantMy ears hurt from such a thread. After so much arguing, one forgets the inherent beauty and values of the sport. Just calm down and remember what the thread’s all about.
October 22, 2014 7:15 pm at 7:15 pm #1066483zahavasdadParticipantI think the mods changed the title of the heading to the proper title
The English dont even know how to spell
Kerb instead of Curb
Tyre instead of Tire
And please tell me what a Car Park is supposed to mean, Is it a Park for Cars? The correct term in PARKING LOT
And how about a Lift? whats up with that, Lift is a verb not a noun, correct term is Elevator
And please explain to me a “Flat” , A flat is something a car Tire gets when it loses air, not someplace you live in, the correct word is apartment
October 22, 2014 8:32 pm at 8:32 pm #1066484zahavasdadParticipantEnglish is the one language where nobody decides what a word is
All other languages have a consortum that decides what is and what is not a word in that language
And most new words come from American English
October 22, 2014 8:35 pm at 8:35 pm #1066485sirvoddmortMemberThere is an American language. It’s called American English, but it’s really not English. It’s American, which makes it a thousand times better than English.
I could refute every single one of these slights against the English, and may indeed do so at some future point (definitely deserves it’s own thread). But for now this will have to suffice.
‘American’ English is merely a simplified version of what you would call ‘The Queen’s’ English. Case in point, ‘sidewalk’. Whilst the original language recognizes that describing a concrete noun (pun intended) with the term pavement is perfectly understandable, and is a natural progression of language, coming up with a name for unique objects. The Americans, however, seem not to grasp this, and require a seperate name that describes the function of a pavement, hence ‘side-walk’, something on the side upon with you walk.
And you have the audacity to castigate original English for the noun/verb balance, when sidewalk is guilty of precisely that fault.
But instead of deconstructing the faults of the American corruption of the English language, I will sum it up as follows. If we invented it, we decide how to use it, how to spell it, and how to define it. The day our colonial cousins learn to come up with their own language, they can ruin that. And I’ll leave you with this quote from Her Majesty the Queen, in conversation with the late Steve Jobs (before he died, obviously),
“Dear Mr. Jobs: There’s no such thing as ‘American English’, just English…. and mistakes”
October 22, 2014 8:59 pm at 8:59 pm #1066486zahavasdadParticipantFYI you forced english on US, just like the Spanish forced spanish on Latin America and Portugal Forced on Brazil and the French forced french on their former colonies
October 22, 2014 9:35 pm at 9:35 pm #1066487👑RebYidd23ParticipantA thing done intentionally is not a mistake. And “slights” in the plural is incorrect in the context in which you used it. (And you did not personally invent the English language.)
October 22, 2014 10:33 pm at 10:33 pm #1066488sirvoddmortMemberA thing done intentionally is not a mistake.
It is if the intention is to do that which one has neither the right nor the ability to do, then intending to do it is a mistake. And seeing how most ‘Americanisms’ (a much better term than ‘american english’, seeing how the differences are minimal and Americans speak regular English – or try to – in virtually every respect) are borne from Hollywood or corruptions over time, I think mistake is not too strong a word.
FYI you forced english on US, just like the Spanish forced spanish on Latin America and Portugal Forced on Brazil and the French forced french on their former colonies
And?
We still invented it, developed it and are, right now, by far the best at using it. You still call a sport involving very little foot action ‘football’. And no-ones answered that one yet.
October 22, 2014 10:36 pm at 10:36 pm #1066489sirvoddmortMemberAll other languages have a consortum that decides what is and what is not a word in that language.
Please google OED, or Oxford English Dictionary.
October 22, 2014 10:42 pm at 10:42 pm #1066490sirvoddmortMemberThere is no term “American Soccer” so by default it is best to use football to mean the oblong pigskin, and soccer to mean that round black and white ball kids use around the world.
The fact that there is no term ‘American Soccer’ is completely irrelevant. The fact that you (plural) chose to misname your sport after ours, despite the fact Gridiron is much closer to Rugby than football, is none of our concern, and does not mean we must stop calling our sport what we’ve always called it to make way for your mistakes.
It’s a bit confusing attempting to conduct the same argument over two threads, so I’ll focus here on the English language, and regarding the Football/American Football debate, in the Soccer thread (the changing of the title made me lose any confidence I might have had in the moderators).
October 23, 2014 4:26 pm at 4:26 pm #1066492ChortkovParticipantSirvoddmrt – I just noticed this thread; I am backing you all the way! ENGLAND!
The only thing I disagree with you about is the Moderators. Our moderators are an excellent bunch, with great senses of humour, and there is no reason to complain.
Stop being so nationalistic, voddmart. Forgive me if I’m wrong, but I get the impression that you have more pride in your country than you have in being a member of the Jewish nation.
Firstly, take everything sirvoddmart says with a pinch of salt; you wait until you him arguing the other side of the coin!
And if you look, there was no pride at all, it was simply pointing out that we invented the language. And you haven’t heard him talking about Jewish nation either.
I think your attempt at a slight on sirvoddmrt’s singlehanded defeat of the CR American Contingency, and you owe him an apology!
October 23, 2014 10:20 pm at 10:20 pm #1066494Letakein GirlParticipantYou’re right, Yekke.
Voddmart, I’m sorry about my precious post. I judged you by one thread, and not judging people is something I am passionate about, so I really feel bad. Dunno what happened to me there. I have asked the mods to remove that post.
October 23, 2014 10:52 pm at 10:52 pm #1066495Letakein GirlParticipantOh dear!
It’s not precious, it’s previous. Now my whole post sounds sarcastic! :'(
October 23, 2014 11:26 pm at 11:26 pm #1066496sirvoddmortMemberYekke, thanks a lot for the support. Glad you approve. Still, I was kinda enjoying the whole ‘one man crusade against the devaluing of the English language in particular and sport in general’ thing.
And LG, ease up. What you preciously posted (I think you mean previously) was neither mean nor judgmental, and is probably one I would make, and probably have at some point made, especially when faced with perceived excessive nationalism. Although yekke2 is right, my argument did not stem from nationalistic pride, simply supporting my point as regards the language.
But it is worth keeping one thing in mind. I don’t actually really care about what I argue about, as regards essentially pointless issues such as language or nationality (except football, I’ll defend that to the death), I do it for the love of arguing. If I am ever scharf, it is for comic effect, not because I mean it. This is probably an even bigger fault than the one you pointed out but, well, there it is.
Duke
October 29, 2014 12:35 am at 12:35 am #1066497BTGuyParticipantsirvoddmort, with all due respect, you could not be more wrong. Making a declarative statement that something is irrelevant does not serve as a proof.
The fact remains, aside from your clouded emotional outlook, that football as played in America and Canada, even on the professional level, has no other name associated with it other than football.
Soccer, wants to be known by two names: soccer and football. Sorry, only one name per sport. Stop hogging up two names; one of which refers to another sport entirely.
No more ambiguity. Soccer will retain soccer and leave the term football to football. With the new rules in effect, there will be zero confusion as to what soccer is and what football is.
Cased solved!
Thank you for you attention to this matter.
March 26, 2015 12:36 am at 12:36 am #1066498sirvoddmortMemberI am going to dredge up this old thread for the purpose of answering a question put to me in a recent thread.
And because I would like to have the last word on this matter.
BTGuy, I don’t know if you are still active in any respect, but I seem to recall answering this question on a separate thread. I will quickly repeat that for your benefit.
Having two names does not make either of them lose their legitimacy. I have no objection to Americans referring to Soccer within their own country, as they have [mis]appropriated the word Football to refer to their inferior form of Rugby, a game that incidentally has no ‘Ball’, which the dictionary defines as being round or at least almost round, and which has no use of the ‘Foot’. But never mind that, amongst themselves they may use whichever term they fancy.
It is when Americans seek to impose their misnomer onto the rest off the world, i.e. the civilised portion who recognise Football/Soccer as a better, more skilful and more enjoyable pursuit, that I take umbrage.
‘Soccer’, as has been pointed out, is a word that stems from the official name of the sport, Association Football. It is basically a slang term for Football. The name of the game is Football, the Association part refers to the particular set of codified rules. So the name actually is Football, and it can also be referred to as Soccer. We choose to refer to it as Football, as is our right both as the ones who got there first and the majority. American Football’s official name is Gridiron Football, the Gridiron referring to the field it is played on, and therefore can be referred to either as American Football, Gridiron (as I have heard it called by Americans) or, amongst Americans, as simply Football.
So your point about Football/Soccer hogging both names, whilst AF only has Football as it’s name, is nonsensical for two reasons. Firstly, as I have said above, even were it true, so what? Why would we change the name we invented, and that is used by the vast majority of the inhabitants of this planet, and got to first, in order to accommodate a country that not only can’t come up with any good sports, it can’t even name them properly. And secondly, your point isn’t correct anyway. AF/Gridiron has plenty of names, more than Soccer/Football even, and therefore can bow to the inevitable and use them when in an international setting such as this forum (if the website wishes to refer to itself as Yeshiva World News then it is only fair it should be international).
And I will not claim for this to be the last word, as you did, to avoid confusion if you are in any way unable to answer.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.